yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] adomad:
Hallo,

also ich würde einem neuem Rom auf Deutsch auch sehr positiv entgegen stehen.

Wenn irgendwo Hilfe benötigt wird, bin ich gerne dabei.

Gruss

AdoMad
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] MythDuck:
Deutsches Black 2.5

Also das Black 2.5 in englisch von jj ist super und wirklich nicht schwer zu verstehen in englisch.

Jedoch wäre es in deutsch für uns deutsche super, allerdings könnte man die anbieter spezifischen einstellungen wie gprs sms mms weglassen, damit sich jeder seine eigenen einstellungen drauf machen kann.

kann man ja hier runterladen: https://shop.dangaard.de/files/Qtek/Qtek.htm

Könnte auch helfen wenn hilfe gebraucht wird.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] tadzio:
Ein englisches ROM einzudeutschen ist nicht empfehlenswert. Ich habe das probiert, die obskursten Effekte gehabt und schließlich aufgegeben.

Viel besser funktioniert's, wenn man als Basis bereits ein deutsches ROM nimmt - zum Beispiel das, was bepe in seiner Kitchen mitliefert. Das kann man dann modden, bis es wie ein Black (oder sonstwas) aussieht, und man kann versuchen, verschiedene Programme gegen neuere Versionen aus einem englischen ROM auszutauschen (was aber immer ein try-and-error-Verfahren ist, denn das geht nicht mit allen Apps).

Also: bepe's Kitchen runterladen und am enthaltenen ROM schrauben anfangen! So ähnlich habe ich's gemacht, und mein Trion läuft bombig stabil!

Cheers

tadzio
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] MythDuck:
Kochen

Wenn mir jemand deutsche tipps gibt, wie man z.b. ein vorhandenes ROM in deutsch umwandelt/schreibt, hätte ich auch genügend zeit dies zu tun. Welches Programm mann dazu braucht wäre schon mal ein anfang und ich könnte behilflich sein zum erstellen, testen oder einfach nur zu helfen.

Was benutzt jj für Tools um black 2.5 zu erstellen, vielleicht bekommt man hilfreiche tipps um ein ROM in Deutsch zu erstellen ??
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] Chatty:
Hmm, du hast es also schon probiert? Aber die Builds unterscheiden sich ja inzwischen schon extrem.

Meine Idee war natürlich schon ein aktuelles, englisches Build zu nehmen.

Wäre nett, wenn du deine bisherigen Versuche und deine Vorgehensweise hier mal dokumentieren könntest.

Eigentlich sollten alle (Kommandozeilen-)Tools bereits in Bepe's Küche vorhanden sein. Schau mal rein ;-)
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] ELenz:
Aber es gibt doch schon ein deutsches WM6-ROM von bepe:

http://www.ppc-welt.info/community/showthread.php?t=107144

Inwiefern soll das neue denn "besser" sein.

Könnte man die Diskussion auch unter obigen PPC-Welt Thread weiterführen?
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] pf:
Ich wäre schon sehr an einem deutschen Rom interessiert, da ich keine Zeit mehr für stundenlanges Lesen und Probieren habe.

Wichtig ist für mich, dass das Rom absolut schlank und providerfrei ist. Man kann ja vielleicht ein Basis-Rom machen, dass alles normale zum Laufen enthält und dann ein Extended-Rom, aus dem sich jeder installieren kann, was er will. Denn für mich ist nur eines wichtiger als viel Hauptspeicher: Noch mehr Hauptspeicher.

Die individuellen Providereinstellungen berühren mich nicht -sind schnell von Hand gemacht. Aber mich darum kümmern, wie das deutsche Hardware-Tastaurlayot wieder geht wäre mir ehrlich gesagt zu viel.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] ELenz:
Aber es gibt doch schon das deutsche WM6-ROM von bepe. Wieso tun hier alle so, als wenn es das nicht geben würde. :confused:
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] Reso9:
es gibt zwar schon ein deutsches rom aber das build ist ja auch schon sehr

veraltet.

Also ich würde es auch sehr gut finden wenn z.b. der neuste build von dopod eingedeutscht würde. ich habs auch schon versucht aber ich krieg da nichts anständiges auf die reihe:(
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] gerald_s:
Bepes Rom ist gut, keine Frage. Aber probier mal zum Vergleich Black 2.5 oder Dutty's 2 aus, der Unterschied ist deutlich bemerkbar. Die beiden letzteren beruhen auf aktuelleren Varianten des Roms und sind meines Erachtens schneller und auch stabiler.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] Hektopascal:
Das sehe ich genau so. An den momentan kursierenden ROMs schreckt mich immer ab, dass dort teilweise unheimlich viel "Kram" drin ist, den ich nicht brauche.

Außerdem hat doch jeder andere persönliche Wünsche, was er installieren möchte. Nur mit einem absolut schlanken ROM kann man allen Wünschen gerecht werden, denn jeder kann sich ja dann nachinstallieren, was er möchte.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] schlenzie:
Hallo, ich habe letztens auf das WM6 Premium v2 draufgespielt (WWE) und anschl. das Rom von bepe...

Leider ist die Version recht alt und im Vergleich zum Premium echt leer !!

Eine komplette Übersicht über die bereits existierenden "deutschen" Rom´s wäre echt der bringer !!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] chrisnux:
Eine deutsche Version von jj's Black 2.5 wäre wirklich toll.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] tomli:
WM6 in deutsch

Hallo,

habe auch die deutsche Version von bepe drauf, läuft soweit sehr gut.

Ich hätte auch nicht's gegen einen neueren Build und vor allem BIG-STORAGE Unterstützung (fehlt leider beim bepe-ROM, sonst wäre es perfekt)

t0m
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] tadzio:
Ernsthaft, die fehlt? Würde mich doch sehr wundern, weil in bepes Küche eigentlich meine modifizierten Tools enthalten sind. Wenn aber wirklich kein big storage drin ist, lässt sich's aber ganz leicht nachrüsten - bepes Kitchen runterladen, checken, ob meine tools wirklich drin sind, zur Not runterladen und installieren, dann das ROM nochmal bauen.

Cheers

tadzio
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam ROM Development] Lordsnake:
Die Frage ist, lohnt sich der ganze Aufwand. Wird es nicht in nächster Zeit ein ofizielles Rom geben. Ich meinte gehört zu haben das es Ende Mai kommen sollte.

Lordnake
[AT&T LG G3] cables2590:
Don't get me wrong, I really do enjoy my LG G3. I cant help but to want the new HTC One M9. I was debating between the G3 and the M8 earlier during the year, but went with the G3 because of the better camera. The M9 camera should be up to par and the material they use are much better. What did you guys think of the phones released today? Im just curious and wanting to start a new conversation.
[AT&T LG G3] DigitalUnderground:
The deal breaker for me is the HTC logo strip between the bottom speaker and screen. I know it's trivial, and first world problems, but it's so ugly and unnecessary. One selling point of the g3 was the small bezels and the maximum screen space efficiency. The m8 was a better device IMO... But the g3 was a close second with slightly better specs and a better screen
[AT&T LG G3] cables2590:
I agree having the bigger screen and less bezels was a nice addition... At first I didn't think having a bigger screen was not going to make much a difference, but I am a little worried, now, about thinking of going back to a smaller screen... Unless the G4 comes up with something that completely wows me I think I'll get the m9... Everything I look at the pics or videos of the m9 I drool, like eye candy lol...
[AT&T LG G3] DigitalUnderground:
It is super sexy... That's for sure
[AT&T LG G3] eortizr:
I had the M8 at launch. But could not get use to the bezel to screen ratio. And the HTC bottom band feels so unnecessary.
[AT&T LG G3] TemporaryTester:
I'm liking the look of the S6's internals, and it's good to see Samsung making a return to chart-topping specs (well, except the battery life) after the G3 stole the spotlight last year and Samsung released the utterly mediocre S5. Of course I'm bummed about the non-removable battery and lack of an SD card, but it's about time that they made a more premium-feeling device. My S4 is the first smartphone that I've owned that "broke", with the chrome trim coming off everywhere (ew, white plastic), and enough flex that my power button got jammed in.

The M9 looks absolutely awful, not cosmetically, but specwise. No 1440p, (another) lacklustre camera (though not as bad as the ultrapixel trash they were using before), and they don't have the uprated RAM from the S4. Pretty much the only thing this has over the S6 is battery life, as I'm really skeptical whether the DDR4 and 14nm Exynos in the S6 will be really as efficient as they allege. After getting used to the LG's phenomenal (albeit dim and power-wasteful) screen, there's no way I'm backtracking, especially since one year of development should have improved battery efficiency.

I'm eager to see what LG will churn out in the G4, since it seems like my hopes of an Xperia Z4 phone aren't going to be fulfilled.
[AT&T LG G3] cables2590:
We would have to agree to disagree... As it is nice to see Samsung come out with something decent for better competition, I don't think know it's better than the m9... The QHD or full HD won't make a difference in a small 5" screen, but it will make a difference in battery life... The design of the s6 is lack luster from pics, and touch wiz is still 5 steps behind sense...
[AT&T LG G3] TemporaryTester:
Oh no, I fully agree with you on the battery life aspect. I'm just not interested in moving back to 1080 after the G3, and I'm likely upgrading to a phablet after this phone.

I think the S6 looks mediocre, but the Edge looks really nice. Based on my previous experience with TW, Sense, and the G3, I've found OEM skins to have become genuinely more palatable, so I'm not too concerned. Sense is a hell of a lot nicer, but regardless of skin, deleting the launcher (for Nova or GNow, depending on your inclination) removes 30-40% of the skin, and almost all of the lag, if any exists in the first place.

I am keen on seeing the RAM, Exynos, and design improvements on the S6 line. I remember my old Wolfson DAC powered SGS, and want to see how far the Exynos has come since then. Especially if the M9's 810 is as prone to heat as the G3's 801 (and the subsequent battery life and performance drops), I'm a tad wary. Though, I can't believe they removed SD card support, which legitimately annoys me.

My biggest issue with the M9 is that it looks exactly like the M8 (save for the Duo Camera eyesore), which looked worse than the M7 right before it; the way I see it, S6<M8<M9<M7<S6E. As someone who trialled and traded an M8 for my G3, that doesn't have me enthused. Also, reviews have allegedly been against the new camera setup, still panning it relative to its flagship competitors (though not as bad as the Ultrapixel Duo trash), especially for its lack of OIS. Its spec sheet also is perfectly mediocre for what it is, with the only real gain over our G3 being the 810 v. the 801.
[AT&T LG G3] cables2590:
OK I see your point... The design is not for everyone... I am excited to see what LG has in store... My biggest problem is that I'm impatient... But even though the edge really intrigued me when I first seen it, then I read that the edge only shows time and notification... That was a disappointment to me because now I feel like all its going to do is drain the battery... They could have used that edge to be more practical... Idk I think I'm still going with the m9 bit I'm really trying to wait to see what LG has in store
[AT&T LG G3] sic0048:
There is little gained by always chasing the latest and greatest "thing". Sure the new phones are arguably better than the G3, but is it really worth the cost? I really doubt it. Trading for a new phone every 6-12 months makes as much sense financially as trading in for a new car every 1-2 years....... Ride the G3 for at least one more cycle of flagship phone releases and then consider getting something new. Just my 2 cents....... :good:
[AT&T LG G3] GroovyGeek:
I was a big HTC fan, absolutely loved my One XL and even the Aria. Tried to like the M8 but could not get over the stupid logo strip. Not only are the aesthetics weird but it gets in the way of using the phone. Touching the logo strip generates the equivalent of soft button actions but the behavior is very inconsistent.

At the time I was told that the logo strip is there because they need the room to cover up some of the hardware that drives the speakers. Which brings me up to another objection - those damn speakers that make the phone much bigger and heavier than it needs to be. As far s I am concerned a phone needs to have just enough of a speaker to produce well audible beeps and buzzes. Anything more is pointless, that's what headphones are for.

Got the G3 because of the near non existent bezels. The power and volume buttons on the back are pure genius for a phone this size. The launcher is fugly but the first thing in do with any phone is put Nova on, so that does not matter. And once you root and get rid of crap there is hardly any lag. Battery life has proved to be decent despite the QHD screen.

Which brings me to my biggest complaint about the G3 - the QHD screen. 1080p would have been perfectly fine and the battery life would have improved. What a waste. Unfortunately I can't see the G4 coming with a lower res screen from a purely marketing point, and now that Samsung has gotten on the bandwagon HTC cannot be far behind. Pitty. Maybe a motto X is in my future.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] QA Bot:
Q&A for [G800F][ROM][5.0.2][LRX22G] CyanogenMod 12.0 for G800F [Alpha 01/03/2015]

Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.

Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [G800F][ROM][5.0.2][LRX22G] CyanogenMod 12.0 for G800F [Alpha 01/03/2015]. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.

Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kazache:
I can install this rom on my SM G800M?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] martynasmck:
No, you will brick the device. It's only for F
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] okano12:
Great work, dude!!

I bought the Galaxy S5 mini 2 weeks ago and was wondering that until now there were no ROMs for that phone. So I will ntest it too, and will give you feedback as soon as possible.

So Thanks, anyway!!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] basic086:
Really nice release :D And nice timing as well, your post came out exactly at the same time as the Galaxy S6 Launch haha !

Keep up the good work and good luck for the upcoming update to these builds :)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] User_99:
The devices are similar. Both are Exynos CPU, but cellular network (other frequencies for GSM/UMTS/LTE) are different. Means network could work or not
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] slimshady94:
will the microphone be fixed??

---------- Post added at 08:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:29 PM ----------

will the microphone be fixed??

thanks!!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EmilioGO:
ROM is running perfectly; the problem are mic (incoming call) doesn't work[emoji24] please you can fixed it soon? Thanks For the great job!!! [emoji1]
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tapptapp:
Many thank for the great work.

The mic works for me by incoming calls, but i can't hear the voice of the caller and the hands free calling doesn't work too.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EmilioGO:
For me, the mic of my phone doesn't work, but i yes can hear the voice of the caller.... I'm too confused for this problem
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] martynasmck:
Could someone post some screenshots of this ROM?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hennymcc:
I am not sure about the G800M. I did not see any reliable information on this so far.

Maybe you want to complete the overview of the S5 mini variants here:

http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s5-mini/help/attention-please-4-versions-galaxy-s5-t2854134

If you would post the results of CPU-Z there it would be great.

If it is Exynos3470 based then there is a chance that it works with this ROM. But you will probably rather soft-brick your device. Although this is not that bad as the recovery and download modes still work, it would be better if you only do it, if you have some experience with it.

If there is a developer who wants to work on this, he is welcome to contribute to the ROM. It is rather unlikely that I will work on this.

---------- Post added at 10:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 PM ----------

Here are two screenshots:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=58712385&postcount=6

As CyanogenMod 12 looks the same on all devices, I think this should be enough.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EmilioGO:
Hennymmc When you will fix the mic problem ?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] atego:
This Rom seems to be promising, for the moment I go back to stock because I need my phone for my job so I need the mic LOL....:)

GREAT JOB, you're the first in the world who create a Rom for the 800F !
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MitchDeathKills:
S5 mini cm12

Can't wait for one to work on my g800y good job
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] martynasmck:
How many versions of this phone are? :D
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EmilioGO:
G800F(Exynos);G800H(Qualcomm) and G800M (I don't know the processor)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] _LiT:
can someone tell me if the bug happen even with earphones? cause it's my private/working phone...
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stiffmeister75:
Hi, the bug still is there Even when earphones are connected.

Br
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 99henk99:
root

I already rooted my device, is this going to be an issue?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hennymcc:
I posted a list with the models here.

G800H and G800R4 are Qualcomm based and will not work with this ROM.

G800M and G800Y are Exynos based and even the internal device name is the same as that of the G800F (kminilte). There is a (not so little) chance that the ROM will also work for those devices. You can try my ROM, but you may risk to (soft-)brick your device (which can be undone in most cases by flashing the stock firmware again).
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MitchDeathKills:
1st attempt flash to g800y "E: Unable to mount '/system' " soft bicked :( will check downloads and try again soon
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kirikill2015:
Who already established cm12 can lay out its screenshots please!

Angel Angel
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MitchDeathKills:
reflashed to stock rom, rooted then flashed twrp try flashing cm12 again "E: Unable to mount '/system' "
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ElegyD:
Wow, really good job!

Once the few bugs have been fixed, I'll surely flash the ROM.

I'm looking forward to new updates!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] basic086:
Hey do you guys also get that bug where the capacitive keys' light bleep for a few seconds while the screen is off ? Just wanted to know if it was a bug everyone was getting or just me :)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] martynasmck:
I'm having this bug on stock and this rom :/
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hennymcc:
No, does not make any difference.

---------- Post added at 10:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:35 PM ----------

At least the partition assignment is the same for G800F and G800Y.

Could you just flash the recovery and boot the recovery mode?

Select "Mount", Select "System" and press the back-button. Open the file-manager (Advanced/File Manager) and check if you can browse "/system".

Also in the file-manager check if you have this file:

/dev/block/platform/dw_mmc.0/by-name/SYSTEM

If not check if you have the "/dev/block/platform/dw_mmc.0/by-name" directory.

Also start Advanced/Terminal Command, select the directory "/dev/block/platform/dw_mmc.0/by-name", type the command line "ls -l" and press "Go". What does the entry for SYSTEM say?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hennymcc:
Now it is possible for all to post in the original thread.

Please post new messages there and not here.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MitchDeathKills:
Was able to browser system.

file:

/dev/block/platform/dw_mmc.0/by-name/SYSTEM. Is there!

Open Terminal Command and selected "/dev/block/platform/dw_mmc.0/by-name"

Typed "ls -l"

"21 Mar 4 01:08 SYSTEM -> /dev/block/mmcblk0p18

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root"

hopefully this helps cheers
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MitchDeathKills:
G800Y nz verison

Has anyone had success flashing to the 800y? i was able to flash gapps but not cm12 =(
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] User_99:
Wrong device? Only for 800F!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kerode:
has any progress been made as far as installing this rom or cm12.1 onto the g800y?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] InteliDroid:
Thanks bro!!! Really appreciate your work ??
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] HC4Life:
You're a Master!!! :D
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] serignebambasylla:
link ?

link's not working
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Evren35:
Hi Mate not work aryamod forceclose.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] youcef29:
Not work aryamod 4.0 forceclose.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] thereassaad:
For all who's want a try this cam on another tweaked roms like AryaMod or Echoe etc just backup ur old cam & deleted from system/app & flashed .. this working fully on TWEAKED Rom okay

World Is Full Of Nice People. If U Can't Find One, Be One.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Evren35:
Mate am using aryamod v4.0

Deleted system app scamera2 and scamerafilter.

After flashed its same forceclose...
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] maprovrs:
nice work thx [MENTION=2229782]g00h[/MENTION]
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] InteliDroid:
This doesn't work on Temasek's CM12. I just get FC's everywhere. If you have flashed and want to get rid of it just re-flash temasek's rom + gapps and clear dalvik/cache.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] g00h:
[MENTION=5603639]moustafasadek11[/MENTION] mate the Touchwiz camera app generally has never worked on cm (None Touchwiz) roms its only for Touchwiz Lollipop ROMS at least i can confirm fully working on my N4 ported rom
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] InteliDroid:
Yep I understand. As you said just to try and see if it would work on other roms hehe. I thought it would be best to test it and report back so others can see it doesn't work on non-tw roms instead of them going "what have i done wrong" etc etc.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] quartz88:
Your the best...
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] dj_ooms:
Thanks

I can confirm that it works perfectly on g00h's own tweaked N4 ROM. Thanks. Appreciate the great work. Keep it up. :good:
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] patriksuade:
Thanks g00h for your hard work ! Its working good on Norma lollipop Note4 v8
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] InteliDroid:
What rom? I haven't Heard of Norma Note 4 v8 before.

---------- Post added at 12:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:04 AM ----------

I've been looking everywhere and still can't find the norma rom xD
[General Questions and Answers] Xeardon:
Hi Guys, I got a tablet - GoClever Tab S73, it's all like Dropad A8 or Herotab C8, but one is other - my tab got 3 touchable keys (screen below)

i.imgur.com/aUToCI8.jpg

Is there any custom ROM for this tab? I tried few CWM's but I just can move up/down in menu :/
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] englishmale:
With qualcom quick change coming out, I'm wondering if it's possible to port the battery settings from the Z3 to work with our Z1's. Would it just be a case of copying from a Z3 rom or would it need tweaking? If at all possible.