yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[YU Yureka Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mahesh gaonkar:
http://xdaforums.com/xposed/modules/mod-xhalofloatingwindow-v2-38-movable-t2419287

This I tread but not working ouer Yu

I things xposed installer is not actived profally

But plzz give me working link that's you all using

Thank you thanks you

:) plzzz
[YU Yureka Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] barshan23:
Can you tell the exact problem you are having??:confused:
[YU Yureka Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pravanjan:
Xposed installer

Try this link :

http://repo.xposed.info/module/de.robv.android.xposed.installer
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] liorh42:
Hi i have the galaxy note 4 sm-n910h and i want to Flash a stock fm of sm-n910c will it trip my knox or will it work
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RISHI RAJ:
stock file of samsung will never trip knox
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] liorh42:
Ok but will it work if not the same modal but the same hardwere?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RISHI RAJ:
It will work,there might be a problem with network due to different modems coz 910h is 3g only whereas 910c is lte
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] liorh42:
Ok ill try it but it wont brick my 800 $ phone right?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] liorh42:
tried with odin its a fail

what should i do ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sephkateno:
If you're trying with a stock rom of n910c from samfirmware with odin I guess it wouldn't work but your best bet is to root your phone put in a custom recovery and search the exynos forums for a rom i think i saw some people saying that they installed roms for the n910c to the n910h with no problems but i can't be sure which roms in any case its your phone your choice
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mjrshark:
Be sure the file you downloaded is full , maybe some files is broken check md5 to be sure before flashin , and check witch version of odin you should use.

Am talkin from old experience not with note 4
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RISHI RAJ:
flash stock of your 910h through odin
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kratos9500:
So i was installing new rom and in recovery by mistake i wiped out all... and now when i m trying to copy rom data using adb sideload . My phone is not getting detected on pc . Trying using Otg pen drive . Copied rom into it, went into recovery and even otg pen drive is not showing there.

I got no idea why both r not showing up

Using TWRP ...

Any solution?Please help!:confused:
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NWKENT:
I wonder, if the format on your "pin drive" has been corrupted somehow.? probably not..but just a thought..

Also..reboot your computer, to refresh the drivers, be sure your device is unplugged from USB when you reboot..

Maybe reflash TWRP..wonder if something went wrong there also..

Just suggestions..

sent by my: SandStone Black (#2) 1+1

"The FlagShip Killer"

"Praise Jah" YOU people.!
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grimsonfart:
Hi. I'm trying to flash my TF300T to the latest stock ROM. I'm currently on 4.2.1 and bootloader 10.6.1.15.3. Reason being i can't flash TWRP 2.8+ to install lollipop because i get splitscreen issue, so i'm trying to get the latest bootloader by getting the official one...

Ok, now to the problem. Fastboot is setup and working properly. ADB commands work, fastboot commands work.

Problem is, when i try and flash using this command "fastboot -i 0x0B05 flash system blob" (i have placed the blob file in the fastboot directory), it renders my computer practically useless, in other words everything is super slow. In CMD after entering the command nothing happens. It's almost like it's working insanely hard, yet nothing is happening. The first time i let it go on for about 30 mins because i didn't want to interrupt it if it was flashing, but i decided to hard shutdown my computer. Nothing had been done and the tablet turned back on as normal

Any help would be great...
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] das chaos:
Wrong command!

You can't flash whole ROM blob on 'system' (i.e. OS) partition because ROM blob contains bootloader, partition table, recovery, kernel, system and userdata, which are to be flashed to other partitions.

Therefore our Transformers have a 'ramp-up' partition called 'staging'. On reboot bootloader flashes the 'sub'-blobs of blob (blob.EBT, blob.SOS, blob.LNX, blob.PT, blob.USR) to their respective partition.

Use:

fastboot -i 0x0b05 flash [b]staging[/b] blob[enter]
fastboot -i 0x0b05 reboot [enter]
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grimsonfart:
Really?? you see, i have been following a few tutroials on doing this on this tablet, and all of them gave me that command. Thanks a lot anyways, will try :)
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] das chaos:
This should work! However it will last along time. When tab reboots, you will see a blue progression bar, which sometimes seems to freeze. Let tab restart by itself.

If you don't succed, you might have a corrupt blob, either by downloading or by unzipping with an outdated winrar (suffered that myself).
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grimsonfart:
Well, no luck first time. Exactly the same thing happened when using that command in CMD. Not sure if it's a problem with my PC or what... Going to re-download the files from ASUS.

Not sure what you mean with that blue progression bar? (really long time since i have messed around with my tablet) You mean on the tablet? When i'm in fastboot and trying to flash nothing happens, i see the same rck, android, whipe data and all the writings on top left is the same.

I am doing this one a really old computer though (no access to mine atm). It's windows XP SP3, 1gb ram and intel celeron 1.8ghz i think. Not sure if it has anything to do with this but anyways.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] das chaos:
When you flash to staging, bootloader copies blobs to their partitions after reboot, while this happens, a blue progression bar is visible on ASUS Screen not on bootloader screen.

As you report it, you are probably not in fastboot mode.

Try to follow:

1. Press power + vol down -> bootloader screen appears with icon RCK blinking. Now you are in fasboot mode.

2. Connect tb to pc; tab should show up in Win's device manager as ASUS fastboot device(o.s.). If warning sign appears or 'unknown device' label, install proper drivers.

3. Open terminal window with admin permissions in fastboot folder.

4. Type

fastboot devices [enter]

-> device should be shown; if not: type

fastboot -i 0x0b05 reboot [enter]

tab should now reboot into OS; if not, fastboot doesn't work.

5. Try procedures 1. to 4. with every single USB port available. If no success try different pc (normally WINXP is no deal breaker, Win 8.1 sometimes might be).

6. Report.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grimsonfart:
It worked now :D. I just had to wait for about 20 minutes then it started sending "staging". Aftr that it all went fine. I guess it was just the computer being a ****.

Succesfully booted into android too. Everything working fine. +1 for your help anyways man. Cheers
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] das chaos:
Glad to be of any help.

You might add to your OP tag [Solved]
[General Questions and Answers] optimusodd:
[Q]Tried possible fixes still "Error dwnloding app frm mrket.Insufficient space..."

Fixed the problem by reflashing the Stock Firmware.No idea what was causing the problem.

If you are facing the same problem,read it (what "Dark3n" suggested ) before proceeding for a reflash.

Hi guys,the Infamous "Error downloading app from market.There is insufficient space on the device."problem is back to haunt.I am unable to find a solution even after an intensive research and troubleshooting :confused:

When I am trying to install the applications from the Google Play Store, I am getting this error.

While I have sufficient space (500 MB) in the internal memory.I can’t even install the small apps like Root Checker.ASUS apps are also not getting installed.

I have faced the same error in the past on my previous devices but that got resolved after wiping the cache partiton via CWM Recovery.But this time the problem is so persistent.:rolleyes:

Things I have tried :

>Cleared cache using Clean Master and CacheMate.

1.Checked and if there's any “ .odex file” in “/data/app”.NO .odex file there.

2.Wiped cache partition via recovery.

3.Force Stopped “Google Play Store” and “Google Services”.Cleared “Data” and “Cache”

4.Force Stopped “Google Play Store” and “Google Services”.Cleared “Data” and “Cache” and uninstalled “Updates”.

5.Stop the market app.Then clear the cache from inside the task manager according to this post.

This error is annoying the crap outta me and I am at my wits end on this one.:eek:

P.S. Yes,I know,I can use "FolderMount" OR use "Link2SD" to link the apps to SDCard,I just don’t understand the point of wasting 500 MB space.That’s beyond comprehension.

[Asus Zenfone5 A501CG] [Rooted] [Android : 4.4.2] [Build :ASUS_T00J_WW_user_2.21.40.44] [Stock Recovery]

(Updated to 2.21.40.44 via OTA.Do I need to "Factory Reset" my device ?)

Ever faced the same issue ? Any clues ?

Any help on this problem would be greatly appreciated!!!

Thank you!!
[General Questions and Answers] Dark3n:
Could be a permission issue, or preexisting files that fail to be overwritten.

Try SD Maids CorpseFinder and enable all extra filters in the settings, that should find issues with preexisting files.

Make sure that you have enough space specifically on /data/data.

If you can record the failed install in a logcat there might be more specific information.
[General Questions and Answers] optimusodd:
Thanks for the response buddy.I had already fixed the problem by flashing latest firmware by the time I checked your post.

You are right,that could be a permission.I have been using SD Maid for a long time and no doubt it's such a wonderful must have utility,unfortunately I didn't think about the preexisting files :rolleyes: Anyway,it might be useful for othere users.

Thanks again for your support and developing such a wonderful app :)

Really appreciate that.

Regards
[General Topics] spybld:
Hi!

I'm in the market for a phone, I like the HTC ones. I would like to do the following with it at the minimum:

GPS nav via bluetooth & playing mp3's in the background at the same time.

Be WM5 at least

The rest I think all pocket pc's will do (like syncing with outlook etc)

But the main thing is are the HTC wizards powerful enough to do the GPS + Music at the same time without hiccups? If not, are the Hermes?

(this is going to get use in the car if you haven't guessed ;-) )

Thanks!

-spy
[General Topics] Rudegar:
trinity c
[General Topics] spybld:
thanks! I really , *really* like the trinity. It would be ideal

But I've not mentioned.... price is a factor... and that phone is $500+!

-spy
[General Topics] spybld:
Anyone with a wizard tell me if GPS + mp3 is possible?

-Thanks

-spy
[Sony Cross-Device Development Themes and Apps] Curst:
Sony has decided to release a beta version of the Theme Creator for our Xperias.

Go get it at https://developer.sony.com/develop/smartphones-and-tablets/theme-creator/
[Sony Cross-Device Development Themes and Apps] gregbradley:
Please search before posting

http://xdaforums.com/crossdevice-dev/sony/theme-creator-beta-sony-t3044141

Thread closed
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mannysroot:
Hi

I have tried a couple of lollipop ROMS and its the same on both. The vibrate seems to be significantly weaker than my previous ROM.

Is this a ROM specific issue or is there any other way to improve it for notifications and calls?

Thanks

Manny
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rhoban:
Probably through the STweaks app that comes with the kernel.

I saw that some have a vibration intensity setting.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] UnixCRoot:
I have fixed. 3Q
[Sony Xperia E3] angelofhope:
Hi,

Is anyone using a headset/headphone (with mic) with working inline controls (volume/ next/...) on their Xperia E3?

Hoping someone can share their experiences...

Thanks!
[Sony Xperia E3] ielle227:
I'm bought Sony's MDR-XB50 Extra Bass IEM which I find really great because of the sound quality you get for an affordable price.

I have tried Bose, JBL, Audio Technica, Philips, etc., but this one's the best in my opinion. :)

Link:

http://store.sony.com/extra-bass-earbud-headset-zid27-MDRXB50AP//cat-27-catid-All-Headphones-Earbuds
[Sony Xperia E3] angelofhope:
Those look like decent ear-buds, however, at the moment I am looking more towards solutions with active noise filtering.

I often ride my bike to visit family and friends (more ecological/economical) and like enjoying an audiobook while riding (off course not when in traffic). But noise from nearby auto-routes and just wind makes that I often turn it louder than it should be, so that's why I'm hoping to find some good (economic ;) ) headphones with active noise cancelling.
[Sony Xperia E3] zuppysurja:
M using dis product of Skull candy from last 8 months. And trust me its great in sound & quality. Specially the bass effect is too good. And it has all the features u mentioned.

It has Mic with controls like next track, previous track, play, pause. Skull Candy Ink'd 2.

Press thanks if it was helpful.:p:good:

Here is the link. Have a look at it.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Skullcandy-...-Chose-from-7-Colors-New-In-Pkg-/251832557351
[Sony Xperia E3] cnagr:
I don't think there many economic headsets with active noise canceling.. I am using SBH20 bluetooth stereo headset, which doesn't have active noise canceling but does a good job though, having keys for the control of the player up (previous/next, play/pause etc...). It is sold 19,90€ in my country.

Here is the link of the product: http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/products/accessories/stereo-bluetooth-headset-sbh20/#tabs
[Sony Xperia E3] silv3rfox:
Search no more. Xiaomi Piston 3.

http://www.gearbest.com/earphones/pp_169225.html.
[Security Discussion] snapper.fishes:
Just bought a new Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Wifi and I have been debating whether to enable full disk encryption. I know that the stock android implementation of encryption is entirely software based, but Samsung mentioned in their documentation that their ODE (On Device Encryption) system supports hardware accelerated encryption. However, information on the topic is scarce, and I cannot confirm which models actually support acceleration.

Does anyone know of a list of android devices that supports hardware accelerated encryption?
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
Go to Settings/Security and if it says Storage Type-Hadrware Backed, then your device has crypto module. However, big warning here: if your master encryption key sits in hardware (like in Iphones), there is nothing easier for a sophisticated attacker to get the key directly from there. If, like in Lollipop, the master key is salted on hard drive and crypto module holds another key used to sign the master key, that provides an additional layer of protection against brute force attack. In other words, someone can take an image of your entire hard drive and then brute force your password offline or in the case of Iphone, just get the key from hardware. In lollipop, it is impossible. So, sometimes google does good things (by mistake)...
[Security Discussion] CHEF-KOCH:
Android disk encryption is based on dm-crypt, which means it's at the block device layer. The encryption algorithm used is AES-128 with cipher-block chaining (CBC) and ESSIV:SHA256. The master key is encrypted with 128-bit AES via calls to the OpenSSL library. New Lollipop devices encrypted at first boot cannot be returned to an unencrypted state.

The unlock PIN/password is used to derive the AES disk encryption key which is stored in the volume header. As from 4.4, scrypt is used to derive the keys in order to make brute force attacks a little harder, but using a strong password instead of a stupid PIN remains highly recommended. On certain Nexus devices, the key is hardware-protected (likely TEE).

Nothing is impossible but's harder:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31765672

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-apple-and-google-users-researchers-discover/

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31729305
[Security Discussion] bastei:
What have these news to do with Android encryption?

Seriously, there was a clear question by the OP and you didn't even try to answer at all. Instead you copy and paste text fragments from other websites and post irrevelant links...
[Security Discussion] CHEF-KOCH:
[MENTION=842726]bastei[/MENTION]

And how your post helps here? I explained very well that FDE is vulnerable with several attacks. It isn't worth to use it, especially on such hardware, because it costs a lot of performance for nothing.

FDE isn't secure to use, especially if you have a mobile device which allows the attacker to get physical access to it + the mentioned attacks.

But to answer the question:

Hardware accelerated encryption is dependent on which hardware (needs to support special flags like AES/AES-NI/AVX) you use and if your os supports it (minimum Android 3.x) or not. And no there is no list, because all new hardware after (and some of them before) Android 3.x comes with support for it, the Tab S uses AES 256-Bit Encryption according to the specs.

It's Samsung On-Device Encryption (ODE) and not on Risk ...
[Security Discussion] snapper.fishes:
Yup that's a typo. Going to check the settings when I get home today.
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
With all due respect, but your explanation is wrong. If encryption is properly implemented, you reduce vulnerability to virtually none. Users just have to understand how encryption works and what it is designed for. Contrary to popular beliefs, disk encryption is not designed to protect the device that is live/running, it only prevents access to your data, when your phone is off. By the way, the term "full disk encryption" , as it applies to Android, is highly misleading, because unlike in Linux, Android only provides for data encryption.

However, Android allows to implement encryption in a way that it is virtually impossible to break. You can have separate passwords short for screen and long/strong for boot and encryption. In addition, Android Lollipop provides an extra layer of protection by putting a second key, which is used to sign the master key in crypto module (hardware). This is much better than in IOS (iphones) where the master key simply sits in hardware crypto module and therefore could be easily obtained by a sophisticated attacker (think back doors in crypto module and weak hardware assisted random number generation).

Let me give you an example with my Sony Xperia Z1 running custom lollipop. I have enabled 256 bit encryption; I have increased the length of various keys, as well as the number of iterations for random number generation; then I have disabled in kernel hardware based weakened random number generator and enabled all other methods inactive by default (thanks to google and sony for making it easier to break for spooks); I then disabled hardware overlay option, which causes slow down, so, now, there is no visible difference in performance with unencrypted device. And finally, I have encrypted the phone via adb shell by using a long pass phrase, so that screen pin was not used in encryption in any way, including its salted traces on the device. By the way, when you encrypt lollipop via adb shell, you don't input your raw passphrase, but rather its hexed version, and guess what, I hexed it on my computer, as opposed to the phone. So, when I turn my phone off, I know that no sophisticated spook can get access to my data even if they take an image of all my partitions and try to brutforce the password off the phone. They simply can't. No one can break properly implemented 256 bit AES encryption. That is why the spooks need backdoors in hardware and weak random number generation (the latter is disabled in kernel on my Z1).

So, properly implemented encryption (and Android Lollipop provides for that) does not visibly slow down the device and can make it impossible for spooks to break. .
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
I agree with you regarding weaknesses, but they all are rellated to improperly implemented encryption or user's misunderstanding. You have acknowledged that if the phone is off "they are stuck." That's what I call properly implemented encryption, and no tool can help including their super fast computers. By the way, if they do it on the device, in lollipop, data will be erased after 10 attempts, not to mention that there is a slowdown mechanism to prevent brutforce. Stealing online: yes, this is true, but again, it is possible to restrict any app from contacting the internet (afwall that was recently updated for lollipop and Xprivacy). On my phone, only web browser, mail client and sip client (all non google) have access to the internet; and since I have no Gapps, there is no "phoning home" Google's servers. Performance: it is true that encryption degrades performance somewhat, but again, if it is properly implemented, human's eye wouldn't notice. By the way, I think the reason Google is back pedalling on default encryption is that they have realized they really created something that is difficult to crack. Hence, they'll "modify" it soon to help their sponsoring spooks.

"Nobody use a strong password (eg 20 chars) " I use a boot pass phrase that has over 60 characters. This one was used for encryption, as opposed to a screen pin. You can only do it via adb shell.... Again, it is all about implementation. And by the way, most of the time I use soft reboot, which does not require me to use the long phrase at all.

A lot of people over-estimate spook's abilities. Despite the recent revelations: they can't do magic, meaning breaking encryption and they know it. That's why they are colluding with everyting that "moves" to put backdoors, weaken number generation, force weaker ciphers and so on.
[Security Discussion] SilentEYE:
May I ask you if using an xposed module is a risk for the whole system itself? It shouldn't be too hard to abuse it and to bypass xprivacy itself and the Android firewall.
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
Don't use any xposed module that is not open source

Use Afwall built in iptables binaries, as opposed to system ones or better move builtin iptables into your system

Prevent any xposed module including xprivacy and xposed framework from internet access

---------- Post added at 04:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:50 PM ----------

GAPPS vs. Google encryption: I can't examine or modify GAPPS, but I can Google encryption, which is open source

Xposed modules: Xposed framework needs root once only during installation. After that you can revoke root permission

Attacker use of ADB: no matter what attacker does, he can't mount Data. Even on a live device, if pings are disabled, as well as all incoming connections, there is no way to reach the system over the internet. Now, I am not talking about baseband or simcard exploits, but if you face that kind of an attacker, then you don't use cell phones at all. The point stands: if your phone is off and it is properly encrypted, there is virtually no way to get the data. And I say virtually only because of baseband/simcard exploits.

Erasing data: If you look at lollipop's /system/vold/cryptfs.c and .h, you will see that erasing data is implemented after 10 unsuccessful attempts (the number could be reduced).

Low end devices vs. high end; regular user vs. advanced: you can't have a product that will satisfy all. You can't lower safety standards to satisfy the low end regular user. 2015 Mercedes is safer on the road than 1976 Honda. If you have advanced knowledge, you'll benefit more than a regular user. And if that user refuses to help himself, he will have to face the consequences.. That's the way Linux (and Android is its ugly daughter) is built... :)
[Security Discussion] bastei:
You already mentioned some of these things over at unclefab's "How To Secure Your Phone"-thread. Any chance to get some more detailed steps or even diffs of your changes?

Thanks!