yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
Gapps Update: 8-1-15 -Removed cleaning options of Google apps in /data as it didn't work

http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=banks&device=gapps
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Momovan:
Momovan

How can I disable the navigation bar?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
Delete this Line in the build.prop and reboot

qemu.hw.mainkeys=0
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Momovan:
Thank you very much, I did it! :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Pollie81:
Keep up the great work optx! I'm really loving this rom, i didn't update to the latest though because my phone is running so great right now. Now I'm playing with the latest boeffla kernel which is also awesome. A really nice combo!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] :
My phone has lost 10% of battery while idling for 8 hours. What can I do to reduce the drain? I'm using the built in wakelock blocker.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] JulGer01:
Is that really a serious question? If you want no drain, turn off your phone! [emoji6]
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] :
Well, thanks. If you can't help, don't reply. When I was using TouchWiz the drain was like 3% max.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] -rage-:
Are you using greenify? If not, give it a try...

Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
Tip:

1. delete Facebook and Messenger,

2. delete Hangouts

3. delete Google Plus

4. delete GMail

5. disable sync

6. Turn off the display

7. Turn off GPS an Google Maps or Here.

Helps all not or have you installed any of these apps, you must buy a better battery.

Now seriously, with full use, 8 hours are normal + - 2 hours.

Very much depends on installed apps.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
Gapps

New Gapps:

8-7-15

-Updated Core GApps against Nexus 6 5.1.1 (LMY48I) factory image(arm bits)(Thanks and credits to TKRuzze)

-Updated Core GApps against Nexus 9 5.1.1 (LMY48I) factory image(arm64 bits)(Thanks and credits to TKRuzze)

-Some bored noob script adjustments

### GApps for Android 5.1.x Lollipop by BaNkS

-Dynamic Google Play Services (dpi), Google App (Search), Swypelib, and FaceLock based on cpu architecture (arm and arm64)

-Core Google syncing apks

-Google App (Search) for "OK Google" everywhere feature

-FaceLock for SmartLock feature

-All corresponding libs/files/etc. for the above to work properly

-Nothing more and nothing less

http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=banks&device=gapps
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] nebg:
Any links to kltedv?

Is there any updated versions of kltedv available? The old aicp_kltedv_lp-10.0-UNOFFICIAL-20150730 version had some notification sound cracking issues?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] biglo:
Is the IR blaster working on this rom? Seems to be broken on alot of AOSP roms.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] lucsbran:
I'm new on Galaxy S5.

Is this ROM for the SM-G900F version ???

Is SM-G900F = KLTE or KLTESPR ???
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] :
SM-G900F = Klte.

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 PM ----------

IR blaster is working.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] nebg:
Are we going to have any test builds updated ? (KLTEDV)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Greggd:
I keep losing sound on my ring tone. All other sounds work. It happens here and on Bliss. Even if I change the ringtone I cannot get a ringer sound.

Edit - It's working now after re flash.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] joey jojo:
What are the chances of the developer adding

qemu.hw.mainkeys=0

permanently to the build.prop file to enable navbar?

Personally I use it and have to enable it again after every nightly update.

For me it is personal preference but all other ROMs I have used in the past have at least had the option to use it. I love this ROM and find third the only issue that bugs me.

Thanks in advance.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jujijoog:
AICP Anti-Piracy Service

*WARNING*

DO NOT flash this ROM if you use any of the following apps:

Freedom.apk

Lucky Patcher

Black Mart

The devs of AICP and other custom ROMs such as exodus (a new ROM based on Cyanogen from the vanir devs that is available for klte and kltespr) and others are implementing what is effectively an anti-piracy trojan in their ROMs.

It's a service that runs in the backround and literally blocks you from installing these apps. Not sure why the devs felt the need to implement this trivial and easily bypassed "feature" but it goes against everything I thought the AOSP stood for and frankly disgusts me. While it is easy enough to bypass this using third party apps or a hex editor, I do not wish to support any developers that would stoop to this level of greed because they feel they are owed more. If you want money for your code, I totally understand, but this is AOSP not apple and there is a time and place for everything. Don't take out your misplaced aggression at software pirates on AOSP because although this is just a little bit of code it is the beggining of the end of AOSP. If you compromise your integrity now, it's a short trip from here to bloatware with a monthly subscription fee.

And it doesn't stop there. Apparently there was talk of banning both aptoide and XPOSED in these ROMS. That was voted down but aptoide was still on the table as far as I know. The fact that the idea of banning xposed from AOSP roms to stop its users from pirating is ridiculous and out of control. Its frankly shameful. In a modern internet climate that is becoming increasingly controlled and corporatized, AOSP is a beacon of hope to me. A reminder that technology belongs to the many and not the few. This decision spits in the face of that hope. People will say im being dramatic but this is a huge deal to me and if you care about having the freedom to do wat you want with your phone, which im pretty sure most of you do then this should be to you too. I thought I could trust AOSP devs to do the right thing but apparently they feel that it's their place decide which apps I can and cannot install. I urge you not to flash this ROM or any ROM that would compromise its integrity by adding code that is meant to control its users. This is the kind of thing that made us choose AOSP in the first place. It doesn't even make logical sense in an open source ROM as inevitably new versions of the ROM will be released with this ridiculous code removed. I am seriously disappointed as AICP was one of my favorite ROMs. The devs own this ROM and have the right to do whatever they want with it but as a user you have the right to flash a ROM with a little more integrity.

Don't take my word for it,

READ UP!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/3eo8sj/antipiracy_measures_on_android_custom_roms/

https://github.com/AlmightyMegadeth00/AntiPiracySupport/pull/7
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] UND312DOG:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/3eo8sj/antipiracy_measures_on_android_custom_roms/
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] optx:
Going to make new builds this weekend, been very bussy with rl....

The AICP Team did not say any word to get rid of Xposed, there is just the Anti-Piracy Service....

Are you on klte ? Can enable it in my unofficial if you like.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] lunerceli:
Here's my take on this. I doubt it will ever effect anything to be honest. Until Google actually implements it into their code, it will be easily removed if CM or AICP or any other ROM opts to include it. Android is based on Linux and Linux is open source. That's why 98% of everything for Linux is free. Even if it is baked into the ROM, I am 100% sure someone would release a script or apk that would completely devastate the source of it.

On the lighter hand though, I doubt optx would allow something like that into his ROM.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] joey jojo:
Yeah, klte

I don't mind the fact that I have to manually enable it via build.prop, but it would be less work to do every time I run the update every other day.

I have used a fair few cm12 ROMs and usually its already available in setting (usually disabled by default) of those ROMs.

If its easier for you or anyone who knows how to complile a zip file for me to add and run in the update installer, I'd be happy with that.

I just like to disable the hardware buttons and use the soft buttons. You know what they say... a tiger never changes its stripes lol. :D
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jujijoog:
OK first of all this feature is already implemented in exodus ROM. I found out about it after I was blocked from installing freedom yesterday. So it has already effected me and the problem is if we allow this, then what next? And yes there are already methods of bypassing and an apk is already floating around to handle this but my point is it shouldn't be there in the first place. As far as I understand AICP has already decided to implement this. I could be wrong but I think its the ROM devs that wrote this code (not neccesarily aicp devs). I don't think its coming from Google. That's why its so outragoues to me. And OPTX just confirmed that it being added right above your post!!!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
You can activate the navbar with Gravitybox, if you are using it. ;)

View attachment 3438312
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] lunerceli:
Well, looks like I am either going to be staying on my current build of AICP or say bye bye to it altogether. I don't have any pirated apps, but I do from time to time to see if they are worth buying. If they aren't I just delete it. But this is really a stupid move on any dev who puts this into their ROM. They are truly turning corporate. Not even stock ROMs are doing this type of thing which means that the devs of all these great ROMs are turning into the things they fought against in the first place. It is really a sad day for what they have done with AOSP.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jujijoog:


Precisely. This is some Darth Vader s**t honestly. Straight turning to the dark side because of the alure of power and greed. I'm very disappointed.

OPTX, do you have a choice in this matter? I'm not assuming you do, I don't know how much freedom you have when you compile but what would be the consequences of leaving this code out? Do you not see the danger in something like this?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
Precisely. This is some Darth Vader s**t honestly. Straight turning to the dark side because of the alure of power and greed. I'm very disappointed.

OPTX, do you have a choice in this matter? I'm not assuming you do, I don't know how much freedom you have when you compile but what would be the consequences of leaving this code out? Do you not see the danger in something like this?[/QUOTE]

Well thats it. I am going back to stock cyanogenmod. Theses guys can just keep on using their own roms with this built in trojan.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jujijoog:
By the way this is a very important point you made, not even stock ROM devs do this, in fact not even stock touchwiz ROMs or xperia ROMs do this. Why? Because even huge corporations like Samsung and Sony feel that doing so would be too intrusive. I don't know why there is not more outrage at this, which is why I am trying to spread the word. I would love to hear their justification for this and OPTX, I would love to hear your official position on this. Do you believe that this service is justified or do you simply feel that you don't have the power to question this or at least change it and so you might as well just play ball? Who is pushing this? Do the app devs care what users like me think at all? Is this a politically motivated thing? I'm gonna do some research tonight. Maybe there is an IRC chat where I can contact the devs? This would be a great subject for the XDA staff to cover but I doubt they would cover something so controversial.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jujijoog:
I have learned a lot about what I now know to be called "Project Guard" after some more extensive research. However, because I don't want to hijack AICP's thread with discussion about this I created a new thread over in GS5 general discussion. It includes updated lists on which apps are being blocked and by which ROMS. There is a list for ROMs with the service implemented now and for ROMs that may potentially adopt this code in the future, as well as some other resources. Please join us there if this "Project Guard" is of concern to you, like it is to me and many others.

Here is the thread link:

http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s5/general/aicp-exodus-anti-piracy-service-t3177648

OPTX I know you are busy but I would really like to gear your 2cents on the matter when you have time.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] lunerceli:
So it seems now that the anti piracy bit has been put out there and that AICP is putting it into their roms this forum has become dead?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] mikka06:
Don't want to start an argue with anyone but I agree with the devs. This guys are sacrificing their free time and sometimes their families for the same passion we are all here. I've been an android user since Galaxy S, i bricked phones and unbricked it with the help from XDA. But if buying an app that costs sometimes not even few bucks it's a big financial effort, better stay on stock and use whatever you want to have free apps. I know we are not all gifted with lot of money, I've been into hard times myself, but as long as we're using roms that nobody ask something for it, we should just agree with devs choices.

Seriously, this discussion don't even have to happen.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] lunerceli:
That's not the issue by all means. The issue is that this code is actually malicious as it connects to a server to verify the apps stored on your phone. This code also has full access to your phone and can easily send passwords or other sensitive information from your phone if it is so willed and without anyone knowing the better. That is what concerns me the most. And so it should everyone.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
Tell me an app which does not have full access to my phone,

1, SuperSU and all Google Apps, then Facebook, Whatsapp, Viber and so on.

Each shi... app has access if they want to. Your argument is not an argument.

I'm more afraid of Google + + + and stolen apps as of the Anti Piracy code.

---------- Post added at 04:12 ---------- Previous post was at 04:02 ----------

@lunerceli

many Problems come from Google

http://blog.exodusintel.com/2015/08/13/stagefright-mission-accomplished/

HGT - S5 G900F - ONEPLUS ONE - TESLA TTL7 - Windows 10
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] optx:
Got a new place, where i will upload builds : AICP 5.1.1

I just build devices from now on that are wished to be updated, so if you want a new build, feel free to ask.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
not at the moment, thank you

HGT - S5 G900F - ONEPLUS ONE - TESLA TTL7 - Windows 10
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] optx:
?

Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Just a quick question: I've been running build number 10.0 unofficial for about a week now and my phone has never been so fast, smooth and responsive, so thank you to the dev. My question is: is 10.0 the latest build. I did just follow the devs new link for new builds on the previous page and it did link to 10.0 so I'm assuming I'm running the latest build. I'd just like confirmation that that is the case. And thank's again to the dev for a great ROM.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Pollie81:
What about those tipsy/Tesla builds?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Have you got a link to patch the stagefright bug?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] JARR3DF15CH3R:
I am having a couple of problems with this rom, 1 every third party keyboard i try to use does this after i finish typing, corrects itself if i turn phone to landscape and then back, but really annoying to do that every time.IMG="third party keyboard glitch 2, i have lte turned on as reccomended and my apn is correct but i still get no lte, only h+. 3, does anyone else notice battery life dropping at a decent rate when usuing the phone? i can hardly get 2 hours of screen on time, kernel is set to power save. Thanks in advance.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] optx:
What version do you use ?

I maintain them too :D

But dont know if i will make a extra thread here on xda :confused:

Will also still build for AICP klte, as told if somebody want to have a new version, just ask, i will build new Version :p
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
I thought I knew your username from somewhere. :D btw great job on the tipsy builds. I think you should make another thread that way a lot more people will use that rom too. Now most even don't know that it exists.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Szarko:
What build date did this malicious code start being put into the ROM?

This would.help so we can use earlier versions.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] xAD3r1ty:
What is tipsy and intoxicated roms? And is that for s5? I'm curious and willing to try if it works on 900f, could you detail us a bit more about these roms?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HorstiG:
Have a look:

https://plus.google.com/communities/109330559573276360638
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Do the TipsyOS builds have the same features as this ROM?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] srdempster:
Oops. .!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
No. This ROM is based on Cyanogen mod and includes all of cynagone features along with a few custom ones. That rom is based on aosp and is closest to the Google base with layers theme engine and a few status bar headsup and the like.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Zigie:
I have encountered the following issues:

- Problem with Headset (Micro does not work) when "OK GOOGLE"-"From any screen" is activated. One has to unplug the headphone an plug it in again during the phonecall in order to activate the micro.

- After Soft Reboot, several items are crashing: Bluetooth and settings

- "High touch sensitivity" disables always itself. Further it doesn't have any effect to the Soft Keys (Back and Menu/Recent Apps). The high sensitivity only works for the display, not for the touch keys.

- Occasional reboots when using Xposed Romracer V71 -> so I have uninstalled XPOSED and hope the reboots are history.

Cheers,

Dirk
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Thank's. I think I'll stick with this ROM then. It's been an awesome ROM for me so far.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Pollie81:
Just give it a try..

There are also Tesla builds with boeffla kernel and both are simply awesome.

For me personally this is the best I had so far on my S5. And of course it comes with layers themes which is fantastic!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Thank's, but I'm happy here on AICP. My S5 runs great and I'm running boeffla kernel too.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Greggd:
I've had several random reboots while talking on phone with 8/23 version. Rolled back to 8/21 and all is fine.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jomaca9:
RE: TESLA

Yo, bro! Tesla Running great on stock kernel, but audio.... Boom! Too way high! When I say "HIGH!" I mean it can NOT be turned up above the middle of volume level... Including system volume. It just distort the audio! Damn HIGH!

I'll test the Boeffla version and report back! Anyways, Looking good! [emoji106]

Post data: No need an extra thread if you can run both here...

Tip: People asking/reporting/complaining about AICP, can start with:

RE: AICP

And those with Tesla:

RE: TESLA

LOL Keep it up!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Zigie:
Regarding the issue I have described above

- Problem with Headset (Micro does not work) when "OK GOOGLE"-"From any screen" is activated. One has to unplug the headphone an plug it in again during the phonecall in order to activate the micro.

......

Dirty Unicorns is the only AOSP-based ROM (and I have tried most of them) that doesn't have this bug. But: I do not like DU as it does not fix the issue with the touch keys (no light). Maybe you can get in touch with the developer to check why in DU this problem does not exist.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] schorsch.funke:
RE: Tesla

Hi, optx is the Tesla 2.0rc from August 22, i found on Google+ (Ground Zero Roms), the latest build?

Thanks for building this great Rom for us!

Georg
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
I would actually encourage you to use tipsyos. Its based on the same source and is pure aosp. I personally avoid all roms now that contain antipiracy stuff built in out of principle. I shouldn't be forced to have malware type code in my rom because of a select few pirates.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Pollie81:
No, 2.1 is the latest. It's a few days old. Search on Google+ and you'll find it quite easy. There's a version with and without boeffla kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] schorsch.funke:
I only looked under unofficial roms, so i miss it.

Will install it in a few minutes.

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Exoterik:
Reboot

Hello all , I use this Rom for almost one month I think it's a great job. I come to you because I meet a random reboot issue despite a healthy plant, if anyone has encountered this problem . Best regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jomaca9:
RE: Tesla

Tesla 2.1 High Voltage w/boeffla running awesome! Battery + Performance is excellent!

Yes, I miss a little bit those CM Themes, but the Layers I've found are pretty descents.

Keep it up & thanks! [emoji106]
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] maddler:
Cheers mate! Your work is apreciated!!!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] maddler:
Quick one: is there any relevant difference between your unofficial AICP builds on AFH and the official ones?

Cheers

W.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] mikka06:
My farewell to this amazing rom. Thanks to the devs for their hard work, been using this rom last 7-8 months without problems. Hope to see you around building AICP for future devices.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] optx:
They are equal, i just did some builds with different kernels, thats all.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] maddler:
Sweet! Worth trying.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Hi all!

Is the latest AICP dated August 15th? Or is there a later build? I've searched and the latest build I can see is the August 15th build.

Another question I have RE: AICP and TESLA is: for anyone who's used both ROM's, which do you prefer? I'm still running the AICP build from the 30th of July and it's running great. Although I figure, it's time I updated. I just can't decide between AICP and TESLA. so far AICP has been great for me.

Edit to add: I've just found a nightly AICP build from yesterday on their site. I still can't decide if I should go with that or the TESLA ROM. Any advice would be much appreciated.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] maddler:
I'm perfectly happy with the AICP original build. My suggestion is to give Tesla a try and find yourself.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Thanks. I gave Tesla a brief try, but went back to the latest nightly of AICP. I really like AICP and it runs great on my phone.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] maddler:
Agree, it has everything I want and I'm getting pretty decent battery life too.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] PeanutBR:
hey man which kernel are you using ?

---------- Post added at 09:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:38 PM ----------

Has anyone have a good battery life with this rom ? If yes which version are you using ?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] MarkAndroid.UK:
Yes, excellent life using any recent nightly including 04/09.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Diesel779:
Same here. I'm using the same build and my battery life is great.