yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Whistler1813:
I'm with you guthrien on your earlier post of how this will be your last Samsung phone or tablet.

No anger or fanboy rage here. Just disappointment that Samsung put out a heck of a fine piece of hardware and then barely acknowledges its existence after a few months.

If it were just an isolated issue with this tablet I'd be more forgiving but unfortunately in skimming other Samsung tablet and phone forums I've found it to be the norm with many of their devices. I'm the worst kind of customer though. I don't complain to the company...I just don't buy their stuff anymore.

I shouldn't have been surprised though. In 2013, when this tablet was released, there were no fewer than 16 tab and note variants also released in 2013. I'm not even counting the regular smartphones and their variants they released in 2013.

With that many variants, often with SoC and CPU differences within the same "model", no one should be expected to keep up adequate support for all of them. So I'm going to do my part and help Samsung by giving them one less customer to support. :p

For the past year or so I've been flashing several custom ROMs found in XDA and elsewhere; e.g. Hyperdrive, xKat, Hydronium, Temasek, LiquidSmooth etc. They all have their strengths and different takes on customization.

I'm currently on the BrokenOS ROM found elsewhere (just Google it) and I'm really enjoying the speed, customization, and the fact there's no overweight CM theme engine. Theming by layers (BrokenOS) just seems more direct, simple, and less of a "workaround" feel you get with the CM engine.

I still hope Samsung will at least release one 5.1 update before it's totally forgotten. It would help the ROM devs immensely.

I'll continue to use this tablet until it dies or until the 3rd party ROM development dries up. It still amazes me what this almost two year old tablet can do...and do well.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] gilvbp:
Samsung already release sm-p901 and sm-p900 5.0.2 firmware.

Just need someone to port like already did with sm-p905 and sm-p605.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] edthesped:
I hear you... I'm pretty much done with Android in general and have started migrating to Apple products, something I thought I would never ever do. My move started with the wife when the hospital she works at supplied her with an Ipad, then the kids school moved all of their textbooks and curriculum to the Ipad, something I'm still not sure I agree with,. When it was time to get them new phones they got Iphones and though they say they miss some things about their old android phones neither would consider anything but an Iphone as a replacement. I'm the last holdout in the family but see an Iphone in my future. I don't see moving to a mac anytime soon as there isn't a version of the software I use for Mac which I find a bit odd being that the software was originally designed to run on Unix and was later ported over to Windows, I digress... In any case, in playing with my families IOS devices I'm finding IOS to feel more polished than Android.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] murigny64:
To port a rom, you have to compile a lollipop kernel for P600 :cool::rolleyes:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] gilvbp:
Just that?

and the rest, after compiling the kernel.

What else i need to do?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] murigny64:
If you're able to compile a kernel, you're able to know what to do for the rest.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] kornelius1982:
Yeah, compiling kernel is 90% (and the hardest part) of the job , rest is just a makeup.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Shawn5162:
Did the P905 port of lollipop use the Note Pro 12.2 kernel ?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] murigny64:
Don't know. Touchscreen, lcd are not the same, so many variations on ramdisk and perhaps kernel.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Orion116:
Glad you are enjoying BrokenOS?

Third party ROMs have just been made possible and I have no plans of ever giving up my Note.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] GaresTaylan:
Is there a list somewhere of the devices it supports? I found their G+ page but for the life of me cant find an easy way to tell if my 10.1 wifi is supported.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Orion116:
P600?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] JTH182:
I second a vote for BrokenOS. If anyone here is wanting Lollipop on this device, I say go flash it ASAP. It is very clean and highly customizable. I'd say its much better than stock Touchwiz that Samsung would give us. Couldn't be happier.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] GaresTaylan:
Yep
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Orion116:
I am the maintainer for BrokenOS for the p600.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] gilvbp:
Hi can you port 5.0.2 (sm-p900/901) to 600/601

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Orion116:
I stick to AOSP ROMs so probably not.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] lynx2k50:
Can you make BrokenOS available for the P605?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Orion116:
Probably not since I don't own one or know of any of the issues it has.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] ToastyZ71:
I'm content to wait for either stock Lollipop or a Lollipop TW based ROM for my P600. One of the things I do with the tablet is watch Tivo recordings, and the Tivo app doesn't seem to work on AOSP ROM's. Can't really complain too much about this tablet, either - bought it on Ebay with the dark screen issue and opened it up and fixed it for under $200 for a 32GB unit :D.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] GaresTaylan:
Ive been using BrokenOS for a few days. Its lightning fast. Unfortunately I doubt I will be using it if we get official lollipop. Ive grown too accustomed to TW for some of the simpler tasks and my wife shares the tablet once in awhile as well.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Stevethegreat:
The problem with AOSP in this tablet is that it neutralizes some of its selling points. That is to say multi-window and proper Pen support. Without them this is another Android tablet.

By the way I'm not telling those so that to downgrade the work done by AOSP developers, it's excellent and so far as I have tried their roms, they actually turn this tablet into a top of a line tablet even by 2015 standards.

But the killing of those two main features is what makes them seem mostly a novelty and not a serious contender when compared to TW roms. I means as much as I hate Touchwiz and it's the first that I remove from any Samsung device, (un)fortunately it uses well the main features of this tablet (screen real estate, pen, plenty of ram).

To make a (very) long story short a proper AOSP rom (for this tablet), as in a proper contender to TW roms, would be one that also includes (at least) the most basic TW features. I know that that's not AOSP's point. AOSP's point is to have as clean and as lean as possible software ... but one can dream.

Having said that that's a great rom and it would be(come) even greater if its future iterations is/are being developed side by side/with valexKernel (<- that's some of the goodies that we do not get on TW roms)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Orion116:
Actually AOSP ROMs S-Pen support is better then TW. It is Air Command you miss. As for multi-window it is a mute point because stock android is getting in M. As for kernels there are two custom ones the one you mentioned and BrokenNote.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Stevethegreat:
Not air command per se. The ability to cut certain parts of the page and then "share it" with my email app. The ability to start notes with double tap of the spen, "write on screen". Some of them are doable with 3rd parties but in a less ergonomic manner.

Same is true for miltiwindow. I've tried M's offer and TW's is miles ahead. For example I can drag and drop text from one window to another (very useful, use it all the time), completely hide a window (very useful to play youtube on the background), 4 simultaneous windows + a dozen floating ones.

For better or worse many of Samsing exclusives have become 2nd nature to me to the point that I feel like going 5 years in the past when using a tablet lacking those. If I was less of a power user of a tablet (it's my maiin device by now) I would probably choose AOSP .

AOSP is amazing for core use (for example all my phones run aosp). In fact I love AOSP so much that I dream for the day that an AOSPish version of Samung's exclusives is released so I can finally move there.

Btw I've tried your rom and I think it's top work. Keep it up ;)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] icemanscion:
I had read that 5.0.2 was coming to the SM-P607. If that actually does happen what are the odds we can get a version for the p600? According to T-mobiles official software updates page

Manufacturer Development

Software Version: Android 5.0 "Lollipop"

T-Mobile and the device manufacturer have agreed to support a new software update.

This is for the SM-P607.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Vasishtha:
The absence of multi windows has always been a deterrent for me to avoid aosp roms on this tablet.

But recently the sluggishness of the TW roms has pushed me over the edge. I was able to tolerate some delay in the ui, but the in app experience of some vital apps just sucks . To much lag and to little flare.

I hope to use the slim recents function (Tamesek's rom) as an alternative to multi window, although it's a far cry from what I need.

All these Samsung experiences has turned my gaze opon the surface 3;windows 10 of course but also console OS(native android on the device complete with floating and splitscreen wimdows)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Stevethegreat:
My "kind of" solution for the slugginess is to use custom TW roms which are completey lean (only the necessaries) and when in MW (that's *critical*) never let two apps running on the same window. It makes everything absolutely sluggy. I know it's a serious bug (who said TW multiwindow system does not has serious faults, it's still milles ahead of the others though), so whn I feel handling the windows becoming sluggy (a serious delay is added) there is an option (from the multiwindow pop-up icons when one presses the blue orb) that lets you deal with the different apps thqt may be open on each and every *single* window. I simply only let one app running on each window (at all times), if not for that MW gets unusable real fast, real soon).
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Vasishtha:
I mean in app lag in general, whether its in splitscreen or not.

Do you mean that you make sure the 2 apps you're using are the only splitable apps in your recent app history?

I've had several very clean and optimized TW roms in the past; the recent one being eNOTEX V2+xluco-kernel-v6b2+Nitro optimizations (an eNOTEX included script).

Even with all the optimizations I grew tired of the different kinds of lag. I may go back and compare AOSP with TW, but right now I'm flying(with AOSP) and I don't intend to land just yet.

For now I won't be missing splitscreen because I'm using my laptop as a second screen.

I hope TW lollipop will bring great improvements, but I assume the battery drainage will be inherited from all non galaxy s6 devices. And no way in hell that this tablet is getting 5.1.1.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] ¿Will-it-Blend?:
I'm using the Tab S ROM and I've found it to be pretty fast and smooth even in multitasking. I do hope that Samsung will update this tablet, but I'm still greatly enjoying mine as is. AOSP just doesn't do it for me and I've tried pretty much every AOSP ROM.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Vasishtha:
Do you mean Hyperdrive?

I removed it because is has a splitscreen resizing lag, but right now Im willing to live with it.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Stevethegreat:
A alright. Yeah, like the user above Tab S based roms did it for me too. They seem generally smoother.

As for split window situations, I didn't mean completely killing the oher apps per se, merely not letting them run on split window too. There is an option that lets you leave only a single app on each window of split/multi window :good:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] ¿Will-it-Blend?:
No an actual port of the Tab S

http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-note-10-2014/development/rom-note-s-10-1-2014-rom-beta-t2859040

Been running it for several months now.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Vasishtha:
Oh I know that one. But I also removed it because of some serious battery drain issue's.

Are those issue's solved?

Oh as in not 3way or 4way split?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] ¿Will-it-Blend?:
The dev didn't package a kernel with the ROM so it gets flashed with whatever kernel you were previously using. This can be the cause of those battery drain issues. So after I flash the ROM I flash the stock NJ1 kernel from Xluco's thread and call it a day. I usually average about 24-30 hours of battery life with 4-6 hours screen on time.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] chevdor:
Hello,

I am fighting since yesterday to get the OTA update to install so I wanted to share my current steps and hopefully someone can suggest how to move on.

I have a GT-I9505, initially 'samsung version'. I installed TWRP in order to install the GPe edition. My phone is rooted.

I used to have TWRP 2.6.x

A few days ago, I got like many the OTA update for Lollipop. I let the phone download it and reboot. That´s when things became a bit more complicated.

After reboot, it went to TWRP where no update happened. If I reboot, I get back to be GPe version 4.4.4

I tried upgrading TWRP to a recent version without better results. I tried with TWRP 2.8.1.0

I have read in several places that the issue is that the OTA update expects the stock recovery.

Unfortunately so far I did not find a stock recovery for my S4 that does the trick.

I tried using the "Miustone_stock_recovery-flash-GE4.3". I could install the recovery.

I did save the OTA zip but I don´t know how I can skip the download and use the OTA zip... so so far I do it the 'lazy-lengthy' way and I wait for the download.

After flashing this 4.3 recovery, I get a slightly better result (but nothing better than I got using TWRP): After downloading the OTA, the phone reboots, goes to recovery and it tries to install the OTA update but it fails with the following message:

​

mmc_test.ko has unexpected content... Status 7

Can anyone suggest a way to easily install this OTA? I guess using a correct recovery could help... if I could find it.

Any hint appreciated.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] justda:
if your rooted, you cannot OTA update.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] chevdor:
Are you saying the recovery is NOT the issue and if I unroot (I guess this is possible) it would work ?

As an update, I just tried now using Miustone_Stock_Recovery-flash-XXUBMF8.zip and I get the same result.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] justda:
I have seen alot of people complain about the 7 error, i even got it when i attempted to update. Everything i read states you cannot update with the OTA .zip if your phone is modified with root and/or a custom recovery.

My advice is use one of the 3 or 4 GPE roms from the 9505 thread. But if you want to totally factory reset your phone have fun, to each his own. :good:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] chevdor:
Hi Justda,

First of all, thanks for your time and answers. My expectations are fairly low actually :) I installed the GPe version thinking it would make it simpler.

I was happy to get the OTA thinking I could upgrade in a click...

I realize from your answer that the OTA I am getting on my I9505 is actually meant for the I9505G and thus will not work whatever I do (correct me if I am wrong).

I will follow your advice and pick up one of those ROMs. Do you recommend a specific one?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] justda:
iBastid or Danvh are my go to guys. Both are active and have a large following of users.

Danvh is straight up no aroma install, you mod it yourself.

Bastid uses aroma to give you more initial choice with his customizations.

But its up to personal preference right now, GPE is still to new for a lot of ROM pimping...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Kushan02:
I would suggest you to use antaresone's lollipop rom

link here http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s4/i9505-orig-develop/rom-cyanogenmod-12-t2943934
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] franzyroy:
Questions, it's not here, ask to move this thread in the good section... Q & A
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wakkaday:
there was an app made

that could send your exisiting installed apps over to the amazon fire tv

what was the app called?

thanks
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Freediver:
If your intent is to side load and install an apk to the FTV from PC, then you're looking for the Amazon Fire TV Utility App.

There is also AGK Fire that lets you side load and transfer apps directly from your smartphone.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] simondo22:
I use an app called caze
[ONE General] Ritij:
I'm having an OPO Global invite. It expires soon so if anybody wants one, contact me soon
[ONE General] katichachere:
is it still available?
[ONE General] Gamm86:
There's a dedicated thread for that: http://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/general/wishing-invite-soon-t2825090/page638
[ONE General] sreedhar.bu:
Hey can you please share one with me? Thanks in advance!
[ONE General] shirengg04:
global invite

will expire in 9 hours if you want mail me on shishir.malviya04@gmail.com
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] fone4u:
Hi,

Anyone in Ireland? I recently bought a new O2 speak easy sim card in RoI, and I also got a O2 XDA IIs.

I needed to configure the GPRS connection manually but I had some trouble getting the correct settings. I tried to configure with following settings but it didnot worked any more.

Access point name: pp.internet (speakeasy) *

Username: gprs

Password: gprs

Domain: leave blank

Press Advanced button, leave first page as is. Press the Servers tab,

tick the option "Use specific server address" and enter the following:

DNS: 62.40.32.33

Alt DNS: 62.40.32.34

WINS: leave blank

Alts WINS: leave blank

Press Ok then Finish

Could anyone give a hand?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] abdelrahim:
Access point name: pp.internet
[General Questions and Answers] ReggaeDude99:
I've unlocked my Moto G $g. I want to undo my actions and return the device to its original state: unrooted and locked. What is the easiest way to do this?
[G 2014 General] vikasb32:
Very useful information [emoji106]
[G 2014 General] WhiteWolf:
u forgot the default scheduler of g2... Row.. :)
[G 2014 General] StariX37:
Oops :p I m going to add it and Let u Know .
[G 2014 General] gnubash:
The inner intricacies and mechanics of digital systems never cease to amaze and excite me, as an engineer. This is what it's all about - beyond the gloss and the polished glass, under the hood, deep down at the transistor & gate level. What an amazing time we are living in :)

Thank you for posting this, God bless you. Happy Christmas. :D
[Moto G General] Malyaj:
First of all don't panic. :laugh: There is a solution for your soft bricked moto ;)

NOTE- This method is used for soft bricked moto g.

Soft Brick- When your device is in a bootloop and it can boot into bootloader or fastboot.

Hard Brick- When your device is complete gone and it doesn't even boots.

Now flash the Brazilian Kitkat 4.4.4 using this way :-

NOTE- Dont flash or restore your previous backup of 4.4.2! It will brick your device!

Brazilian kitkat 4.4.4 link- http://www.mediafire.com/download/5...4_KXB21.14-L1.40_38_cid12_CFC_1FF_SVC.xml.zip

Download mfastboot - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4PT9WP-u_z9NXRBWF9EV2lGcWs/edit

Extract mfastboot and the brazilian 4.4.4 in the same folder and open command prompt in that folder. ( press ctrl+shift+right click- open command line here)

Connect your moto g to pc in fastboot mode.

In the command prompt flash 4.4.4 using the following commands :-

mfastboot flash boot boot.img

mfastboot flash recovery recovery.img

mfastboot flash system system.img_sparsechunk.0

mfastboot flash system system.img_sparsechunk.1

mfastboot flash system system.img_sparsechunk.2

mfastboot flash modem NON-HLOS.bin

mfastboot erase modemst1

mfastboot erase modemst2

mfastboot flash fsg fsg.mbn

mfastboot erase cache

mfastboot erase userdata

mfastboot reboot

Remember- Flash using the following commands only as they have skipped bootloader and partition table file of kitkat or you would HARD-BRICK your device.

Now let it boot. The screen would be flickering after the boot. Dont panic :p . Now after the boot has finished. Transfer moto g brazilian update to your phone and reboot into recovery. Place in on the root of your sdcard.

Link - http://www.mediafire.com/download/w...sion.210.12.40.falcon_umtsds.Brasil.en.BR.zip

Now reboot into recovery and apply update from sdcard. Wait for 10-15 mins.

Congratulations! You have unbricked your moto g!! :highfive: :laugh: :D

If i helped you. Please be Kind Enough to press the Thanks Button. ;) Not just say thanks press thanks. ;)
[Moto G General] windylawyer.1712:
this is used when xt1033 get soft brick! i think u should give more detail about kinds of brick :D.
[Moto G General] Malyaj:
Thanks mate! :D I will mention it in the guide! :)
[Moto G General] stechiocca:
Hey man I followed step by step the first part of the guide but after that I went into a boot loop with the google logo ... what can i do?
[Moto G General] Malyaj:
Tell me more? was your device on soft brick? and was it on 5.0/5.0.1 of Brazilian firmware?? If yes... can it boot into bootloader?
[Moto G General] stechiocca:
r

http:// xdaforums.com/moto-g/help/xt1032-bricked-please-help-t2980601/post57727675#post57727675 here is the thread that i started to ask some help, try to understand something beacuse it's a long story :D merry christmas by the way :)
[Moto G General] Malyaj:
Same to you bro... Merry Christmas :) and bro i have moto g xt1033... not google play edition... or single sim variant and bro its clearly mentioned in the guide that it is for XT1033 not Xt1032.... Sorry bro.. cant help.. dont know XT1032 :(
[Moto G General] stechiocca:
I finally could solve that problem, i just had to "mfastboot flash partition gpt.bin" at the beginning of the flashing process ;) thank you so much, now im correcly running android lollipop! :)
[Moto G General] Malyaj:
Anytime man :D ;)
[Moto G General] androidxt530:
million thanks,,

you save my moto g,,

tow days am trying to boot

but i cant

after read your post my phone return to life:laugh:
[Moto G General] Malyaj:
Happy to help mate! Enjoy!! :D
[Moto G General] EJRAS:
XT1033 still bricked

Hi

I've got a rooted and unlocked XT1033 (brazilian retail), and after tryed lollipop for a few days (5.0) I decided to get back to 4.4.4 using XT1033_RETAIL-BR-DS_4.4.4_KXB21.14-L1.40-1_1_cid12_CFC_1FF.xml. The first problem was in gpt.bin, it shows FAILED, saying couldn't access DATA, and the same thing happens with motoboot.bin. Everthing gone ok until I tryed to boot the phone, it got stucked in "Warning Bootloader Unlocked" message.

I've tried everthig again, I change the gpt.bin with the one from lollipop (Blur_Version.210.12.40.falcon_umtsds.Brasil.en.BR) and it works, but motoboot still gives the FAILED message and the xt1033 doesn't work. I've tried adb push/fastboot misc, cwm and philz touch and, with this one, I noticed that the sdcard doesn't mount (perhaps the reason why the "data error" had appeared the first time.

I've tried everthing I know, except from a fresh lollipop ROM (not update) simply because I couldn't find one.

XT1033 still bootlooping...

Any help?