yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] helfrez:
No just the standard Tab A 8.0. I picked it up using the Best Buy upgrade program about a month back. They would give you $100 off with the trade in of ANY working tablet. I took in a 1st Gen Kindle Fire lol, they accepted it and I was able to purchase the Tab A for $129. At $229, not so great, at $129..helluva device. It can clock 10hrs screen on time without breaking a sweat.

I will try this odin one first and report back in a moment. Anything else you guys need from me pull/test?

---------- Post added at 05:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:13 PM ----------

Locking up the tablet still. The openrecovery.tar wouldn't flash, the recovery.tar would flash but won't boot. I may try flashify with the image itself. Do you guys want me to just dd backup all of the partitions and upload them?
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] sub77:
for me there is no need for a dump. , but please tell me, you got the wifi or the lte device?
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
sub,

looking into the platform archive included in the official source release for the sm-t350/355

it appears that we may also need to compile sources for dmverity hash/signature binary for the image

to be bootable/functional

[MENTION=464186]helfrez[/MENTION],

can you request a device forum for this line of devices please?

i'll keep working it here but, this thread is meant for the galaxy tab 4.

thanks.

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] remotehugger:
you guys are awesome !!!!

from my rooted Tab 4 10.1

5.0.2
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
R,

hey so you're good ?

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] remotehugger:
I haven't tried it yet - lol - I don't have a stock rom to revert back to if something goes wonky - I was just saying that cuz you guys are doing all that work for the t350 models and stuff and its just really cool of you guys - ???✌

from my rooted Tab 4 10.1

5.0.2
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] Upstreammiami:
can anyone post a mirror for the t330 please ...android filehost is locked on my job
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jaleroca:
Any word on having a recovery for the t337t, T-mobile variant of the tab 4
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] rob_z11:
any version for ATT T-337A variant?
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
No, there will never be a version for ATT models. ATT blows bubbles.
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
Locked bootloader, sorry, unfortunately impossible
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
T,

have you heard anything on a safe-strap covering ATT devices with identical specs?
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
M,

I'm sorry I have not. I was under the impression development on safe-strap had ceased. Maybe [MENTION=2753063]jaleroca[/MENTION] should try Flash Fire if they want to make backups and flash things?
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
T,

Oh well, i wish i had one of those ATT tabs, i'd love to take a crack at it.

As it is i think i'm trading in this tab for a bottle of vodka and some lawn darts ! :silly:

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] nishu_nisarg:
not able to flash recovery

right now i am having sm t230 nu.i am not able to flash recovery it shows md 5 error.what to do.
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
N,

hi, just remove the .md5 extension

meaning rename the file from

blah-blah.tar.md5

to

blah-blah.tar

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] maine_fungi:
Hey, have you made any headway on this. I have the 8" wifi version.

Thanks!
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
M,

hi,

if anyone with deep-pockets wants to send me the device, then i'll get back to it , but otherwise it doesn't look good.

there has to be a strikingly similar device with a "compatible" recovery somewhere. :confused:

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] maine_fungi:
Yeah, sadly my pockets aren't that deep. :o

None of the stock recoveries over at this thread will help you?

http://xdaforums.com/android/development/root-samsung-galaxy-tab-9-7-sm-t550-t3126827
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] Dark_Cristian:
Hi where i can found the Phil's recovery for a sm-t231? Thanks
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
It's the first link in the OP...
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] Dark_Cristian:
Sorry for my ignorance but if i flash this one and supersu can i get the root acces?
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
Yes as long as you boot directly into recovery after flashing it
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] Dark_Cristian:
Thanks i try before with odin and TWRP and have pass sign but when I reboot into recovery isn't see the TWRP recovery just the stock recovery. I hope i can root my tab with this one
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
You have to disable the "auto-reboot" option in Odin, sorry I forgot to mention this
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] Dark_Cristian:
Awww ok thank you for the hint
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jazzespresso:
weird, I could not able to flash SM-T330/NU/31 Philz 6.58.9 on 5.1.1...hmmm...strange...says error on updater binary in zip...ok I guess need to get updater binary in the zip..
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
What the heck are you talking about ?

xD
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] myheroduane:
Hello will any of these versions work for the sm-t533 UK tab? Thank you in advance.
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] xdagee:
SM-T337A support request

It seems SM-T337A is missing from the OP Thread. O_o
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
That model has a locked bootloader which means no custom kernels or custom recoveries. Same with all the other AT&T and Verizon specific models
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] xdagee:
:eek: This is not looking good at all.
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jdscott666:
I apologize in advance for a potentialy stupid question :)

Does the expanding list supproted by Philz includes Samsung galaxy v g313?

Thanks!
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
I believe you have the wrong forum. You might want to check this thread
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jdscott666:
Been there. Just wanted to check if i can use philz cos i prefer using it than the other 2 recoveries. Thanks anyway :)
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
yeah it does suck, :( folks at att have head crabs. it's not likely the att and verizon tabs will ever be unlocked either.

Hi it's not that i don't appreciate your interest but, this forum is for the galaxy tab 4. But, if your devices specs are largely similar then it's like you can modify any of the tab 4's past and/or present developers trees to conform to your device so you can get a build. The biggest pain in the butt is getting set up and getting the kernel source from opensource samsung without the download tanking and having to start over. see the getting started link in my signature for a brief tutorial on getting set up with a mostly complete listing of required packages for linux.

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] Dark_Cristian:
sorry i can't flash for ODIN because my PC got the Windows 10 upgrade, could you make a .zip flasheable please?, SM-T231 here. TIA and regards
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jazzespresso:
does anyone having issue restoring the tablet using the backup done with Philz Advanced Recovery?
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
I've seen another question in a similar vein with respect to my kernel package for the sm-t330nu TW LP 5.1.1 and similar projects in the past,

I always respond the same, these are the builds I use and have used on a regular and intense basis, believe me you really have no idea, xD

Check your process with respect to what it is you are trying to accomplish, you have very likely attempted something that comes outside the intended function of the product, or made some error or oversight earlier back which is resulting in your issue.

The question, "Is anybody having problems with ____?" invites every dunderhead who doesn't know anything about what they are doing to chime in while supplying no actual information as to what the issue is. User error should always be your first port of call.

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jazzespresso:
thanks for response...
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jazzespresso:
[MENTION=5864662]moonbutt74[/MENTION]

just one suggestion if you don't mind making, when you backup using this recovery, backup names like 2014.02.09.xxxx, it does not gets current date and time.

this is especially confusing when you have multiple backups...
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
Jazz,

hi, i post the sources for other users to compile their own projects to suit their needs. I compile things for my own needs only. If they function as intended as per my needs, i share them with sources linked. I pushed out the other recoveries at the time because there were no other stable/reliable builds avaiable and i attempted to cover as many devices as possible. My undertaking to that end is complete. It is on the user requesting features or modifications/fixes to acquire the posted sources and get cracking. This is XDA. ;)

I pushed out the other builds to also get development moving by owner/developers of the respective devices. This has largely not happened, which is unfortunate.
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] jazzespresso:
understood :rolleyes:
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] bbwarfield:
Hi, Moonbutt.

I checked that URL for T330NU and there are 7 files:

CF-Auto-Root-milletwifiue-milletwifiue-smt330nu.zip

sm-t330nu-Philz-6_58_9-milletwifiue-recovery.zip

sm-t330nu-Philz-6_58_9-recovery-final.img.tar.md5

sm-t330nu-Philz-6_58_9-recovery-final.zip

sm-t330nu-Philz-6_58_9-recovery-milletwifiue.tar.md5

sm-t331-Philz-6_58_9-recovery-FINAL.tar

sm-t331-Philz-6_58_9-recovery-FINAL.zip

Which do I use? Sorry for what may be a stupid question.
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
Use one of the tar files, install with Odin
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
bbwarfield

okay, fair,legit question.

use this version sm-t330nu-Philz-6_58_9-recovery-milletwifiue.tar.md5

https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95887005526787722

I haven't yet been able to reorganize my recovery releases.

This is NOT an invitation to spam my thread with hand walking requests. I have been following

your posts. :cyclops:

m

ps. if i can get an updated recovery functioning with the LL kernel source i will likely update the sm-t33x builds.
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] LenAsh:
Thread closed for now...
[Galaxy Tab 4 Android Development] :
Update. Temporary build for the sm-t533

Temporary build added for the sm-t533

Despite the cortex a53 armv8 64 bit jazz advertised, the cake is a lie !!

See OP for details and make sure to keep a copy of the LP 5.1 release's stock recovery on your sdcard.

This is a 32 bit build all around. no noobs.

[MENTION=3830277]LenAsh[/MENTION]

Thanks. Can you close again please?

Is that a horse ?

m
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TigerDNA:
Explain Life I'm 5: Besides CM acting like a$$hats, why do we care if they don't support the OPO anymore? Will we not continue to have every single Android update on Slim. PA, crRom and all the other awesome ROMS out there? I haven't received my OPO yet so I'm just trying to keep up while I patiently wait at the mail box everyday hoping to get it before the new year
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Heisenberg:
If CM do decide to completely stop supporting this device, dropping CM11S/CM12S and CM11/CM12, you can wave goodbye to pretty much every custom ROM too because they basically all rely on CM at some point during their development. That isn't likely to happen though.

If CM decide to just drop official support for this device (CM11S/CM12S), it means there's some kind of a breach of contract happening because this phone was guaranteed to receive updates from CM for at least two years. Many people decided to go with this phone because it has CM on it, because it runs a ROM that's much more customisable than any other stock ROM on the market. It's like buying a Mercedes only to be told after six months that they're switching the AMG engine out for a Kia engine, nobody would be happy about that.

Transmitted via Bacon
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TigerDNA:
Obviously I'm no dev, but could a CM based ROM be compiled independent of CM just by having the source code. I just assumed in my few years of flashing crap that how it worked. As long as you had the source code from Google/OEM you could compile what ever you needed. Again, I have never tried to develop anything.
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Satorikn:
OnePlus is reportedly working on a CM-free version of a ROM for their phones, including their flagship, the One.

About the independent developers, yes, they are basing their builds on Cyanogen "base", but wouldnt be the end of the world if CM would stop developing their version, since Cyanogen is actually basing on a base Android ROM too, this means that somebody would take over the same features and develop them from scratch or even base from some of the open source from Cyanogen since, Android is Open and most of their developemt community is open too, and who knows, while it would take time, maybe will come with something better, not that i believe CM is bad.
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] amd-dude:
Come on Oneplus, employ the guys over at slim roms or PA, let them make the roms for the phone if CM wants to be jackholes. My only concern is that, is it now possible that CM would push crappy updates to the phone just to be dicks, full of bugs and problems or worse, brick some phones?
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Heisenberg:
That isn't the case. There's so much stuff that relies on work done by CM, I'm not sure you're quite grasping exactly how integral to development CM are. It isn't just a base. It's the kernel, it's the device trees, the list goes on and on. Yes, if CM were to disappear there would still be development, but there'd be a massive hole to fill.

Transmitted via Bacon

---------- Post added at 01:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:34 PM ----------

You're not serious are you?

Transmitted via Bacon
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Satorikn:
I do, i am aware they its just not putting a base rom and skinning it, there's a lot of hardware architecture and software architecture (kernel) involved. But in this era, and open software, it would be a matter of time before somebody else can take charge, would not be the end of the world.
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] amd-dude:
Kinda, I mean it's not impossible for CM to be childish and push bug filled software (after all their responses toward oneplus have not exactly oozed trustworthy)
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Heisenberg:
Honestly, it's a pretty ridiculous notion. The fact that they've had a falling out with OnePlus doesn't even for a second suggest that they'd take it out on the end user, and that's all they'd be doing.

Transmitted via Bacon
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] amd-dude:
Well by screwing the end user they would screw oneplus, I honestly won't put anything past any company these days in the pursuit of money.
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TigerDNA:
I really don't know how much we rely on CM. I just think of it like, CM is free, once they release their stuff, anyone can take it and do what ever to it.
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Heisenberg:
They have no reason to do so though. They would not benefit from it at all.

Transmitted via Bacon
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] paniro187:
I rather plain nexus like experience any cm is just too buggy and has been on every device I have owned and ran with their roms
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] QA Bot:
Q&A for [ROM][All-F2FS] SlimKat with All-F2FS support [02/05/14]

Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.

Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [ROM][All-F2FS] SlimKat with All-F2FS support [02/05/14]. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.

Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FLONE:
new version for slim f2fs

Hi, sorry for my stupid question, I'm newbie.

There is a new version for F2FS other than Slim-grouper-4.4.2.build.4.8-WEEKLY-3876-F2FS.zip?

On slim website is Slim-grouper-4.4.4.build.8.10-WEEKLY-7760, but without F2FS.

If I install 4.4.2, can I update from ota to 4.4.4 without problems?

thank you in advance,
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FLONE:
ASUS NEXUS 7 3G with 4.4.2 update to 4.4.2 with f2fs / slimkat (Slim-grouper-4.4.2.build.4.8-WEEKLY-3876-F2FS.zip)

after update running well, but I discover two bugs:

1. No 3G after update (only WiFi)

2. I try to update from ota with fail (as was expected), but every time after restart/power on, it downloads the update

How can I solve the two issues? Get the 3G part and stop download the update.

Thank in advance
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FLONE:
anyone?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eesadroid:
Find out how to root your device (tilapia), and then find out how to do a clean install.

Sorry not much info. I use the nexus 7 wifi (grouper) so things might be different :)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FLONE:
it was a clean install, i wll do it again
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FLONE:
my fault, I install grouper, not tilapia
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FLONE:
Can anyone guide me how can I do a stock nakasig-ktu84p-tilapia-4.4.4 with All-F2FS?

I make a build, but I'm missing something, because after flash doesn't start. Can someone look into it, if I will put to a host?

thanks
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Thoandroid:
Just to say this rom 4.4.2 and the faux123 kernel just scored 24107 on antutu 5.5, something I have not seen around yet. Thanks for your work.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pxtl:
New to custom ROMs

Hey all, this is my first experience with a custom rom. First off, thanks for resurrecting my dying Nexus 7! Works like a dream now.

Same question as above, I'm getting notices of updates from SlimKat and Google. I assume I should ignore/disable those - anybody know a good guide for disabling that stuff? I should get the newer SlimKat+F2FS updates direct from the Legolas thread, right?

Second, I've found out that my device is no longer compatible with some stuff - mostly Rovio games. What gives?

Thanks for any help you can give.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AleOF:
Doesn't have keyboard

'Hi, I flash this rom but it doesn't have keyboard to enter wifi password, it's only have google text speech. What can I do?

Regards.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] androidluverz:
hello,

is there a way to do this on a mac? i have cm11 on my device and it is fully rooted. can i copy it over cm11 or must i wipe cm11 out of it? thx.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] androidluverz:
Hey , have you convert the slimkat rom to the f2fs partition system?

without that you can not boot it (same on my nexus7).

After converting the rom all is fine and the rom will boot.
[G3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] karlos65:
This might come as a shock to some people but primarily I use my G3 for calling people at work.

I have entered about 8 new contacts in the last week or so and these were lost when I flashed 20E.

This is because when entering a new contact with the G3 the default contact account is the phone so you have to manually change each contact to google as you enter it.

So my question is can I change the default contact account to Google and if so how?
[G3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DelBoy:
There was a discussion about this and the conclusion was you cant.

Maybe some 3rd party dialer would solve the problem.
[G3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] karlos65:
Oh well, thanks.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DNedry:
Hello,

Decided to finally jump into this last night. I've rooted older Samsungs before but never my S2. I have Virgin Mobile.

My problem is that I've tried several different custom roms and no matter what I use my Wi-Fi/Mobile Data will not work. Bluetooth seems to be able to see my devices at least. The home button doesn't seem to work either. Camera and everything else work great.

Currently trying to stick with CyanogenMod 11 (cm-11-20140804-SNAPSHOT-M9-i9100) (Android 4.4.4) for the i9100 but I have also tried AOKP, CM10.1.3, C-Rom. Maybe a couple others I have forgotten when I deleted them in a rage.

I tried a few different modems before I read that doesn't really affect the w-fi.

I would really appreciate any help figuring out how to get this fixed.

Thanks for reading.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Saber:
There must be an incompatibility with android 4.4.4 and your phone. Try flashing different modems (try xxms4 modem) and report back. If that doesn't work, you will need to use an android 4.4.2 based rom or stick back with jelly bean(4.1.2)
[HTC One Max] QA Bot:
Q&A for [ROM][OFFICIAL][CandyKat][t6_ALL_VARIANTS]

Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.

Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [ROM][OFFICIAL][CandyKat][t6_ALL_VARIANTS]. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.

Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :)
[HTC One Max] marctrad1:
Great ROM ! Thanks !
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Fringo:
Hi all,

Long time lurker, first time poster. I have enjoyed my 8125 and when I upgraded to the 8525, I ritualistically came here for all the answers. However, there is one issue that I have experienced that is not echoed by anyone else.

I have ROM version 1.34.502.1 and have the following apps installed:

Eten Dialer

Phonealarm

PQzII

TomTom 6 Navigator

TCPMP

Google Maps

Live Search

The problem is that when I freshly boot the phone and place a call, I can manipulate the in-call volume via the scroll wheel. Up, down, no problem. However, when I exit out of the dialer screen and return to it a few hour later, I find that I can no longer turn the in-call volume down via the scroll wheel--only up works.

If anyone can shed some light on this matter, I sure would appreciate it.

Thank you!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Fringo:
Anyone have any insights into this matter?
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] MikeChannon:
Not much help, but just an observation. The behaviour shown by your scroll volume is certainly not normal. I tested this out on mine. What I did notice was that there is some lag in the response of the scroll volume - so long in fact that it can appear to be non-responsive. It seems the device "remembers" the number of clicks up and keeps trying to raise the volume even though its at maximum. So even if I then scroll down it can take a few seconds for it to complete trying to raise the volume before it begins trying to respond to my down scroll. In fact this behaviour can make it appear as if when scrolling down it actually is raising the volume - but I think this is only due to laggy behaviour in my case?

Mike
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] zim2dive:
I found that the E-Ten dialer disabled my scroll wheel short-cut to call history and quick dial. When I removed it these functions came back. Shame, I like the big buttons.

Mike
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Fringo:
Thank you guys for your responses. It wasn't a huge annoyance for me. I just don't like it when functionality just evaporates away from my phone inexplicably. Hopefully, it can be resolved somehow? I will look for further responses.

Thank you all in advance.