yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ryanalan82:
Lesson here is don't use xposed unless u do 5 minutes of reading first on how to use it with this phone. Been using it correctly since launch day, why...... cause I didn't just install it, I read what was suppose to be done before and after it is installed. Sorry just really sick of seeing the countless posts about this. There should be a sticky about xposed, but people would still fail to see it.

Before you even install xposed you should:

1. With titanium backup, freeze health service, private mode, and s health. Wipe data for those apps as well.

2. Edit build prop:

ro.build.selinux to 0 if you have a permissive kernel or want to flash one.

ro.config.knox to 0

ro.config.tima to 0

ro.securestorage.support to false

3. Reboot

4.install xposed, install framework, reboot.

5. Install Wanam 3.2.5,( do Not install newest 3.2.6 as there is something wrong with it, causes reboots while hanging at the startup system update process), go into security hacks and tick disable secure storage, and reboot.

6. In titanium backup, unfreeze health service, private mode, and s health.

7. Reboot and enjoy

I've even done this with skipping some of the reboots and been fine, but just to make sure you have no problems, do everything as written. And yes I know I edit other things in the build prop which is really overkill.

---------- Post added at 12:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 AM ----------

So u uninstalled xposed and are not installing it again because u don't want to do a lil bit of work after a fresh install, despite all the pluses it brings? I find it so useful that I probably won't upgrade to 5.0 until xposed is compatible unless xposed will never be compatible.
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] willcor:
.................................................................

So u uninstalled xposed and are not installing it again because u don't want to do a lil bit of work after a fresh install, despite all the pluses it brings? I find it so useful that I probably won't upgrade to 5.0 until xposed is compatible unless xposed will never be compatible.[/QUOTE]

hi

thanks for you input ,

No ,i think maybe you "misinterpret" my last post ?( I did read up and follow correct Guidelines availeable .)

I stated that i know Xposed quite well and have installed Xposed all my other devices ..no problem etc .

On my Note 4 I have installed Xposed "on and off " since October (maybe 3 or 4 times ? i don't really know .)

Overall Xposed work well, no problems ,its just "sooner or later" an app would break !

eg . after using Xposed for a while( week or so )my Play store " broke"..could'nt install and have to apply fixes /patches all over again ( freeze S health / Install Xposed again /clear Shealth data etc etc )

other instant was using Xposed for a while my 'Samsung store " app broke .......!

Had to apply fixes/patches all over again ....!

I had my Private mode working in most of these cases ,but lost interest in hiding apps ..for what ?

I don't keep no "sensitive " stuff etc. on my device ,so don't really have any need for it .

As i am looking more forward to flash "Lollipop" onto my device ,i am not so "interested "

to keep Xposed on my Note 4 .( for every now and then ,for something to break and then apply fixes , after a while that was my experiences .)

Also i believe Xposed is not fully "optimised " for our Note 4 ..as i stated(/reason) , in my previous post above.

So if you chose to have Xposed on your device ,happy with it ,its your choice . (,i have no problem with that )

( i am also overall a " fan/supporter " of Xposed )

its just that my Note 4 is tweaked / running ... very smooth and i have no complaints/issues about... ..battery /lag or anything in paticular .

Good luck
[Nexus 6 Accessories] WinDroidGuy:
Hoping that Rev. 3 is the final version, it's getting better; but still 1-2mm off on the edges. Overall a good product for $6 :)

[YOUTUBE]pZKomtxreJ8[/YOUTUBE]

If you'd like to see my other videos, consider subscribing by hitting the image below

​
[Nexus 6 Accessories] bradputt:
There's only 2 revisions until now, yours is the first???
[Nexus 6 Accessories] WinDroidGuy:
That's correct
[Nexus 6 Accessories] jhk0215:
Wait is that the revised version?

Also I read that every screen protector has a slightly different amount of curve which makes some glass protectors perfect for some people and too big for other people
[Nexus 6 Accessories] bradputt:
He said it's the first. Yes It's really depends on your luck.

If you want a edge free from bubbles, get the orzly one. It's much further from the curvature of the screen.
[Nexus 6 Accessories] AceKingNYC:
I bought this and am going to return it. They shipped in in a non-padded envelope so of course it came in shattered. :(
[Nexus 6 Accessories] jhk0215:
I already have the Orzly one and I don't like how it barely covers the screen. Also I'm pretty sure he misunderstood your question because he wrote "hope that revision number 3 is the final version" which implies that he had the revised version.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] haydent:
So I ended up working out how to get a CM11 hltespr nighty running on the n9005 via TWRP via Odin.

Problem is i doesnt really connect to the carrier network, just momentarily then drops out for some time. Tried right in town, gets full signal for like 1 sec, then no carrier for a bit, then repeats.

Have tried with correct carrier settings, any suggestions ?
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] haydent:
what it ended up being was the wrong rom. in my confusion from TWRP not installing the hlte rom recommended cyanogen mod becasue it said it was a hltespr, i installed the hltespr nightly which seemed to work apart from this. but then i read this "Previously, Note 3 (qualcomm devices) builds were separate, but now they are unified. So, hltespr, hltetmo, hltevzw, htlexx are now all in one build: hlte." http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2616162

And it got me thinking maybe i needed to try hlte again, but use this trick here so TWRP would let me install it: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=49570736&postcount=9
[General Accessories] andreichere:
Hi,

Does anyone know were I can buy Primary Camera module 12.6MP for BLU LIFE ONE M smartphone?

Thanks.
[HTC Excalibur] yaboc:
does WM6 STANDARD (smartphone edition) supports network browsing as opposed to its predecessor WM5?

thanks
[HTC Excalibur] maximr:
No, it does not, but there are apps that would allow you to do that, like Total Commander.
[HTC Excalibur] yaboc:
ok what i meant is if it's ABLE to browse through local network. if OS supports that i can do it with any app. but from ur reply i assume that u have WM6 device and u can browse through network shares is that right?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lil Geeky:
i just got Dual USB Drive and its great but i cant mount it in TWRP recovery "i tried philz and it working in philz " i tried every twrp build since 2.6.3

till 2.8.0.1 and i plug it and check the storage no Usb otg where to mount it and i just need to plug it ? no need to check anything in setting also please if you got it working in twrp tell me your version

Thanks
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lil Geeky:
No body is here to help?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rp158:
Can't answer your question. But try 2.8.3.0 and look at the changelog.
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] baptisedeskimo:
Hey Guys,

I got a bricked Moto G from a friend of mine. The device boots untill it gets to the m logo and then reboots. Device doesn't boot into recovery or doesn't do a factory reset. But i can get into fastboot.

I'm familiar with nexus and samsung devices so I already tried a lot of things but nothing seems to work.

I unlocked the bootloader but no change, tried to reflash stock firmware (RETAIL-BR-SS_4.4.4_KXB21.14-L1.40_42_cid12_CFC_1FF_SVC) via mfastboot but no change.

I tried the hard bricked tutorial found on this forum but my device shows up as fastboot falcon s in my device manager and is not detected when i use the driver for "Qualcomm HS-USB QLoader 9008" it keeps giving me waiting for device when trying to execute the clean flash bat.

I tried to brick the bootloader with the Bootloader bricker but it still shows up as fastboot falcon s.

Any ideas?

The device info for this device is (i deleted serial, there was no imei):

Quote:

(bootloader) version: 0.5

(bootloader) version-bootloader: 4113

(bootloader) product: falcon

(bootloader) secure: yes

(bootloader) hwrev: 0x83C0

(bootloader) radio: 0x1

(bootloader) emmc: 8GB Sandisk REV=06 PRV=07 TYPE=17

(bootloader) ram: 1024MB Samsung S4 SDRAM DIE=4Gb

(bootloader) cpu: MSM8226 CS

(bootloader) serialno:

(bootloader) cid: 0x0007

(bootloader) channelid: 0x00

(bootloader) uid: 5EE000020F000000000000000000

(bootloader) unlocked: yes

(bootloader) iswarrantyvoid: yes

(bootloader) mot_sst: 3

(bootloader) max-download-size: 536870912

(bootloader) reason: Volume down key pressed

(bootloader) imei:

(bootloader) meid:

(bootloader) date:

(bootloader) sku:

(bootloader) iccid:

(bootloader) cust_md5:

(bootloader) max-sparse-size: 268435456

(bootloader) current-time: "Wed Sep 10 18:59:52 UTC 2014"

(bootloader) ro.build.fingerprint[0]: motorola/falcon_reteu/falcon_umts:

(bootloader) ro.build.fingerprint[1]: 4.4.4/KXB21.14-L1.40/36:user/relea

(bootloader) ro.build.fingerprint[2]: se-keys

(bootloader) ro.build.version.full[0]: Blur_Version.210.12.40.falcon_umt

(bootloader) ro.build.version.full[1]: s.EURetail.en.EU

(bootloader) ro.build.version.qcom[0]: AU_LINUX_ANDROID_LNX.LA.3.5.1_RB1

(bootloader) ro.build.version.qcom[1]: .04.04.02.048.020

(bootloader) version-baseband:

(bootloader) kernel.version[0]: Linux version 3.4.42-gb89c9dd (hudsoncm@

(bootloader) kernel.version[1]: ilclbld54) (gcc version 4.7 (GCC) ) #1 S

(bootloader) kernel.version[2]: MP PREEMPT Fri Jun 20 05:33:52 CDT 2014

(bootloader) sdi.git: git=MBM-NG-V41.13-0-gdc5aeaf

(bootloader) sbl1.git: git=MBM-NG-V41.13-0-g683cb0c

(bootloader) rpm.git: git=MBM-NG-V41.13-0-g71b1aae

(bootloader) tz.git: git=MBM-NG-V41.13-0-ga27c415

(bootloader) aboot.git: git=MBM-NG-V41.13-0-g7dc8e78

(bootloader) qe: qe 0/1

(bootloader) ro.carrier: unknown

all: listed above

finished. total time: 0.057s

Press any key to continue . . .
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BobDiaz:
Like I've said in the other topic, try this:
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] baptisedeskimo:
Hey bobdiaz,

I didn't see a reply on the other thread from you but this didn't happen when downgrading. It has always been a 4.4.4 but i wil try the things you suggest!
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] baptisedeskimo:
Oké the explanation you gave me does not resolve my problem.

But i'm pretty sure the brick doesn't come from a downgrade from version 5.

Any other suggestions?
[Xiaomi Redmi 1S] as9333:
Hi xda

Can anyone upload latest version of cm for redmi 1s

As i am trying to port SLIMKAT for our device

I need cm 11 as base rom

Cm removed our device so the link given in android development is broken
[Xiaomi Redmi 1S] dewri21:
https://s.basketbuild.com/dl/devs?dl=Kra1o5/Xiaomi/armani/cm-11-20141201-UNOFFICIAL-armani.zip

Link's broken? Works well on my phone.
[Xiaomi Redmi 1S] as9333:
help needed

Hi xda

I am trying to port slimkat from moto g to our device , it is in bootloop stage

I cannot take a logcat system shows it is offline

Dalvic cache contain bytecode of framework but it is not loading bytecode of app

Any suggestion ? Uploading the entire rom will solve any problem ?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] faux123:
Here's Nexus 6 (Shamu Kernel)

Source:

https://github.com/faux123/Shamu/

file: (Encryption is optional)

http://faux.romhost.me/shamu/lp51/

changelog:

http://faux.romhost.me/shamu/lp51/changelog.txt

Enjoy :D
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] faux123:
reserved 1
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] faux123:
reserved 2
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] freddienux:
Yeah buddy! ?

Nexus 6>Validus>TeamBlackout
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] marcadam:
Nice to see working on the Nexus 6 ?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] NOUFELP:
Here it is! The legend joins the party ? ☺ ?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] stebomurkn420:
Flashing now :) thanks faux... Heads up to everyone, this kernel forces encryption by default ;) just remembered faux was the one posting those r/w speeds with encryption. Will report back in a couple days of my experience...
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Blaze420916:
Hell yes time to flash
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Drefsab:
nice to see you on the nexus not used your work since the htc one x days :)
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] poczynek:
Oh been waiting for this! Hmmm so I'm not encrypted - so if I flash it will encrypt?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Drefsab:
Just wondering about this, I know faux has done lots of work about making FDE work without speed impact but it would be good to know if it forces it or not.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] MONKY_1:
It forces encrypt :/
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Drefsab:
:( I guess I wont be flashing this then for now. Don't get me wrong I think the idea of having encryption as an option is great especially if faux has reduced the performance impact but for me it gives no benefit so I don't personally want to have my device encrypted as anything taken away from performance is a loss for no reason to me.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Xileforce:
Epic, love your apps and kernels!
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] v3n3:
Same for me, encryption should be an option and not be forced :-/

What happens if I use this kernel, when my storage is not encrypted ?

Will everything be overwriten / deleted ?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] MONKY_1:
no everything will still be there but if you want to decrypt then your data is lost.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] brizey:
Going to try this. I use an otg for twrp and titanium, and sugarsync to automatically back up my photos... So I am just a quick check of my downloads folder away from a no impact wipe. If you guys can, I really recommend this route...I like having my backups off the phone, too, in case I ever soft brick.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] cupfulloflol:
When you aren't encrypted, and flash a kernel with force encryption enabled on boot it will encrypt your device. Nothing will be lost (well a bit of time I guess as it encrypts), but if you were to want to disable encryption by flashing a different kernel you will have to format again.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] plasticarmyman:
YESSSSSSSSSS

finally i can use my FauxClock app for the kernel it is meant for!

wait...is it compatible?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] rebretz000:
Sweet..... Faux Kernel and it's Encrypted.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] El Nino1977:
Ha me to, what are benchmark apps ?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] jfcooley:
I usually keep my mouth shut but I'd like to offer something.

Benchmark apps offer a little besides bragging rights. If I use one its only to compare one kernel to the other for glaring performance differences. I keep all settings the same as I'd have day to day. Usually there's nothing to see, but over the years I've had one kernel perform better than another, and benchmark confirmed it. Really though, they have little use after that.

As for paying for the app, I think you should be embarrassed to imply anything about a a refund. These guys put out kernels for various devices for free. There's work involved through research, personal time compiling, and don't forget troubleshooting for everyone (even the entitled users who demand something). I've bought numerous apps tied to kernels in the past few years that I ended up not using. The app was a luxury, the money I spent was to support further development and as a kind of "thanks".

My 2¢
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] plasticarmyman:
+1 to all of this :good:
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] EniGmA1987:
Benchmark apps are important because how else would a dev test a change they made to see how it affects things for the better or worse?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] aoaleman:
Really awesome kernel! Thanks, Faux!
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] ScumDroid:
By testing the device themselves? Benchmarks wont tell you if theirs a bug in the code lol.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] EniGmA1987:
I realize it wont do bug checking for you, but that has nothing to do with what I said. So... good job? Maybe you dont know just what kind of changed kernel developers can make? Faux ran benchmarks extensively in the development of this kernel and probably still does. How else would he have been able to improve encryption R/W speeds?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] ScumDroid:
Im talking about antutu and quadrant, toy apps that give you a different score everytime you run them.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] ChaosMinionX:
Theres a reason benchmarks are taken with a margin of error, computations wont be 100% identical every-time, and a multitude of factors could affect the outcome of a benchmark. Would be a much larger discussion of what goes on in benchmarking, but the same thing happens with benchmarks for a PC. They still give you a synthetic baseline to derive performance gains from a computational level, it may or may not translate into an enhanced user experience, and it may be due to some "hacky" code being introduced that causes the benchmark to perceive something as being faster and thus giving a better score ,end of the day they could still be a valid item to say "this is faster than this".

Processors have been getting faster and faster; instruction set optimizations, architecture optimizations, etc. Can you actually "feel" the difference between the Snapdragon 801 and the 805? Probably not, and if you say yes, its your brain tricking you into perceiving it as its a newer product and all the enhanced "power/snappiness" that comes with it. The same holds true in the x86 processor world, there hasnt "really" been a huge leap in performance in the past 3-4 generations of Intel Processors (speaking from my main hobby), and no real discernable difference in day to day observable performance, but benchmarks and subsystem tests lead us to the conclusion that "yes, this processor is much faster than the last"
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] ScumDroid:
Good post man. Cheers
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Hereisphilly:
Guys, check Faux's G+ , official recommended setting for the N6 have just been posted!
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] faux123:
Kernel 002 is out in case you don't know it yet.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] flyinj54:
Just double checking the above post shows encryption is now optional is that correct?

Edit: read channelog and shows no more forced encryption. Thanks! kernel runs very well even with recommended settings for battery life. Very quick and looking and adjusting the settings I am figuring on great battery without the loss of much performance Will report back in a few days and see how it goes. Thanks for the update.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] hackahero:
So how do we change the color values?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] lainemac:
Should be available in Fauxclock
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] journeyman73:
I'm really digging this kernel & the recommended settings. Very fast & smooth
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] HellPie:
Is this kernel compiled with the Linaro/Sabermod toolchain and the various optimizations?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] piit79:
I'm facing a weird issue. When I flash this kernel and boot up, my navigation bar only has the "back" button, the other two are missing... Also, my swipe screen lock is disabled.

No idea how this could be kernel related, anybody has any idea? Anyway, it's fixed by flashing CM12 kernel or LeanKernel...

Also, I'm hoping this kernel will get double-tap to wake support :) Strike that, I hear that can be enabled easily.

---------- Post added at 12:00 ---------- Previous post was at 11:47 ----------

[MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION], I was just reading through the FrancoKernel thread and some people there had the same issue with their home and recents missing from the navbar after flashing the kernel.

It was pointed out there that the following commit needs to be included to fix the issue: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...mmit/287f796c58c77292b7911a3b73fa1a39bc95f24f

Thanks for your work, looking forward to using the kernel! Can't wait to get rid of mpdecision :)
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] ryanbg:
To be honest, you wouldn't notice a major difference between the prebuilt arm-eabi-4.8 and arm-linux-gnueabihf linaro toolchain. In fact, I rarely use Linaro or Sabermod because some of the optimizations require fixing various pieces of the kernel or rewriting some code all together.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] faux123:
Kernel 003 is out with latest thermal drivers
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] 12MaNy:
How are you not a Recognized Developer yet? You're a kernel legend around here and you have over 30k thanks. Wtf is up with that?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] faux123:
XDA politics. I was one of the original rd when they first started the program a while back. I don't care about XDA politics or status.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Circaflex:
[MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION] bought your app last night, 003 is running great so far. Digging the apps material looks, very polished.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] 12MaNy:
Oh, ok. :) Sorry, wasn't trying to open a can of worms. I honestly didn't understand why.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] faux123:
don't worry, the can of worms have long died and several generations of new worms have already spawned and died as well :D

bottom line.. I don't care about the status/title etc :D

Have fun!
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] micmars:
Tell me about it. In fact, don't, I have my own. Not worth it.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] piit79:
Unfortunately, build 003 still doesn't work for me with CM12 - broken navbar and disabled lock screen... Could you have a look at that when you have a minute? It would be great to have a kernel to go with my FauxClock tuning app ;)

Thanks a lot for your work!
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] razor lk8:
Lowest undervolt settings? Any one who try it.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] rignfool:
I was stable at -60 across the board on 002...

Buuut... I can't get the kernel to boot with any undervolting on 003... Still stable at -60 though

Sent from my Nexus 6
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] pyrobo0by:
After flashing the decrypted version whenever my screen brightness is on its lowest, there's seem to be like there's some line going up in down like then old retro TV...anyway how I can fix this?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] rignfool:
Turn up the brightness?

Sent from my Nexus 6
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] pyrobo0by:
Yeah did that, happens only like the first couple minutes, I thought it was just the kernel settling down but its okay now
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Circaflex:
Edit nvm
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] _OverKill_:
x how do I get this application?
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Sleeepy2:
Play store
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] nttdemented:
I'm also having issues using this kernel on CM12. I love your kernel Faux! Are youbworking on correcting this? I use FauxSound and FauxClock a lot, especially since I use high end headphones to watch movies and proper FauxSound eliminates the need to use an external headphone amp.
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] drivel2787:
Tell that to PS4 fan boys lol. They will argue with you all day
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] matheus_sc:
is possible for kernel works in moto maxx (XT1255)? its same hardware of nexus 6 only same more battery and 5.2 screen
[Nexus 6  Original Android Development] Circaflex:
No, this is for the nexus 6.