yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Smart Unlock] etiii:
True. But I bet that they didn't mean to screw this app.. There will be a fix out soon.. I hope :)
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
Of course it has not been intentional, but it is normal that these things happen when a software depends on other. I hope also that there is any solution.
[Smart Unlock] Tatsch:
Is it true, that you use the Keyguard on/off in your app?
[Smart Unlock] hazex:
Yes, it is true.
[Smart Unlock] cramu:
How did you manage to avoid the black screen then, a lot of people experience when they try to disable keyguard with apps like Tasker?
[Smart Unlock] Aruarian:
04-04 update of Chroma fixed the issue for me, app is working flawlessly again.
[Smart Unlock] Nimueh:
Working fine here on Resurrection Rom 5.4.0 (LP 5.1) and the previous one too :)
[Smart Unlock] etiii:
They probably didn't implement the security fix.
[Smart Unlock] DFault:
Superb app!

Loving the app, I used the Google smart lock before but because I live in a building where I get very poor GPS signal the unlock at home wouldn't work properly. Using the Wi-Fi is a great solution! So basically, your app is better then Google! ;)

All in all, this is a great app. You guys deserve all the help you can get. Using a Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE (i9505) with Ressurection Remix (CM12 based ROM) with Nova Launcher. I just installed the newest version of the ROM. This is based on Android 5.1 and the app continues to work perfectly, as it always has for me. Also decided to buy the app, mostly in support of you guys, though having the option to add more devices doesn't hurt either ;)

A suggestion I have: I get the choice to have the need for manual unlock the first time after connecting. I could do without and just have it unlock. Maybe it could even go as far as chosing per trusted device if it needs the first manual unlock? Because Wi-Fi is less secure than say my bluetooth carkit. (simple proximity vs the need to have the car running)

Alternative suggestion that would work perfectly for me: Keep the phone unlocked while connected to any of the trusted devices. To clarify: Imagine a situation like this: I am connected to the Wi-Fi at home. I get in the car (still connected to the Wi-Fi) and connect to bluetooth. I then arrive at work (connecting to the Wi-Fi there) and turn off the car (and bluetooth). Meanwhile I have always been connected to at least 1 of the trusted devices. I would say that in this situation, the phone could remain unlocked. But if I visit clients, go out, visit friends, go to the forest or beach etc... (or the phone gets lost/stolen) it would lose this connection and should lock.

I have no idea if this is technically possible and if this would be something that you would want in the app, I would be happy if you did!

Another suggestion, especially for us using custom ROMs: since I do a new install every now and then (different ROM but also most updates are better with clean installs) it would be great to have the option to backup my trusted devices in a file I can put on the external SD card, so I can restore these after an install instead of needing to be near the trusted devices again and remember to add them...

So in conclusion, these suggestions are nice to have, the app is great as it stands! I am a very happy user and will probably continue to use the app for a long time!

PS. I have sent you a PM about possibly helping with translating.
[Smart Unlock] ojukiyo:
Instalada en Z2 lollipo 5.0.2 + root

Probando estoy.

La aplicación se cerró dando un mensaje de error en la instalación inicial...:confused:

Pero parece que funciona bien.

Os mantendré informados.

Saludos.
[Smart Unlock] Nimueh:
Post in English please ...
[Smart Unlock] GadgetAvi:
WOW thank you so much for this application!

I've been looking for something to work on Android 5.1, and since No LockHome module for Xposed doesn't working on 5.1, I discovered your App! I'm so happy, even without root? Awesome!

10X! :good::fingers-crossed:
[Smart Unlock] jane.h:
Pebble :(

But not too much happiness before trying :(

For example It is not working with my pebbles :( I think when BT device is connected but not visible, then this app doesnt unlock the phone...

Dont anybody know if it will improve soon?
[Smart Unlock] hazex:
Delayed lock BETA

New Smart Unlock Beta (with delayed lock) 10 April - 2015

New Beta that respects Delayed Lock if configured in your android.

Delay only apply if the phone goes to sleep by timeout (no with hardware buttons). This is the normal android behaviour

[MENTION=832590]TheDannemand[/MENTION] [MENTION=5884954]silvertrain78[/MENTION] [MENTION=5275541]merovingian_a51[/MENTION] [MENTION=4794801]Remix22[/MENTION] @latino147 [MENTION=3091901]mastroalex[/MENTION] @landale
[Smart Unlock] hazex:
Delayed lock BETA

New Smart Unlock Beta (with delayed lock) 10 April - 2015

New Beta that respects Delayed Lock if configured in your android.

Delay only apply if the phone goes to sleep by timeout (no with hardware buttons). This is the normal android behaviour

@landale [MENTION=832590]TheDannemand[/MENTION] [MENTION=5884954]silvertrain78[/MENTION] [MENTION=5275541]merovingian_a51[/MENTION] [MENTION=4794801]Remix22[/MENTION] @latino147 [MENTION=3091901]mastroalex[/MENTION]
[Smart Unlock] Bushman87:
Does it work with CM 12? Or still the same problem?
[Smart Unlock] hazex:
No changes have been done in our app for Cm12 compatibility.

The problem is pointed here and I guess the only solution is to compile CM12 without this change.

CM12 could be re-compiled without this change but this must be done by the ROM developer (or the CM team).
[Smart Unlock] alexbelgium:
Thanks for this app, it works great on i8190 with omnirom 5.1.

Only quirk : when booting, it also suppresses the request for SIM card pin code if I am connected to a trusted device.

Couldn't the app be configured to ignore SIM card code requests?
[Smart Unlock] TheDannemand:
Awesome! Thanks a lot for addressing this :)

Incidentally, my Nexus 5 is at a repair store right now to fix a wonky power button. But as soon as I get it back, I'll be testing this immediately.

The Android Security menu has both a Lock after... setting and a Power Button Locks Immediately option (again, I don't have my phone right now so the names may be wrong). I think you're saying if I turn off the screen with the power button, Smart Unlock will still lock immediately, regardless of that latter setting. Is that correctly understood?

I keep that Power Button Locks Immediately option disabled, so even when I manually turn off the screen, it still won't lock until after two minutes. Saves me a lot of unlocking when I use GroceryIQ while shopping, where the phone goes in and out of my pocket all the time.

If there is any way you can make Smart Unlock respect that setting, it would be my ideal.

Thanks a lot again. This is a great app and you give great support!
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
Mmm, sorry, I can't find that option in android stock(Power Button Locks Immediately). Perhaps you were using a custom rom?
[Smart Unlock] TheDannemand:
Hmm... I am indeed on Cataclysm, but it stays very close to stock, with all options gathered in the Cataclysm Settings menu. Thank you for pointing it out. I'll check stock when I get my phone back.

[MENTION=545079]hazex[/MENTION]: I apologize if I reported a non-stock feature there. Update to follow later.

Edit: Oh, wait, you're the other Dev right? So apologies to you as well. And thanks to you as well :)
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
No problem :good:, there are so many roms out there, that is hard not get wrong. Thanks for testing, any information is useful for us.
[Smart Unlock] TheDannemand:
I picked up my Nexus 5 from the repair shop today where they had replaced the power button. They'd also cracked the frame in no less than six different spots when they opened it :crying: They ordered a new frame and promised to replace it when it comes in, but it still sucks.

Before restoring my Cataclysm backup, I flashed the lmy47d stock factory images to check that Security menu. And there is indeed an option called Power button instantly locks. Once again, I keep this one disabled so that, regardless of whether the screen times out or I turn it off with the power button, the phone won't actually lock until 2 mins after. Se attached screendumps.

After restoring my Cataclysm, I'll test the new Beta. Look forward to that. Thanks again for all your great work :)

Edit: I just now notice that I actually took the screen dump while Power button instantly locks was still enabled (after a factory image flash). Again, I keep it disabled -- and should have made the screen dump that way. Silly me :silly:

Edit2: Good news: The Beta works PERFECTLY: The locking is delayed, even when I turn off the display with the power button, assuming Power button instantly locks is disabled. It looks like you nailed it. This was my only gripe about Smart Unlock -- and even then just a small one. I cannot think of anything I would change in this app now :)

Thanks again. You guys are are doing a great service to the XDA community.
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
Yes, I see that option now, thanks. Only is visible if you are using pattern or PIN, and I'm using slide to unlock :)

The behavior is as you described; if the option is disabled, it will lock instantly by pressing the power button ignoring the delay. If this option is enabled it will respect the delay lock of the phone even when you press the power button.

Sorry about the misunderstanding ;)
[Smart Unlock] TheDannemand:
Thank you. You posted just as I updated my post. See my Edit2 note above. For me it works PERFECTLY with Power button instantly locks disabled: When I turn off my trusted WiFi (Smart Unlock goes into locking mode) my phone still doesn't lock until after the specified Lock Delay, even when I turn off the screen with the power button. Exactly the way I like it :)

I think that's what you're saying too, except you say it will respect the delay when the option is enabled -- it's actually when it is disabled.
[Smart Unlock] weinbers:
Not working for me... Nexus 6 rooted but stock 5.1. Smart lock not active, not running any of the incompatible apps, bypassed for hibernation in Greenify. Using pin to lock.

Wi-Fi router is set as a trusted device (checked for all networks with same name - both 2.4 and 5 gaze use same name).

Thoughts? Suggestions? Does the new beta add any code changes other than the delay feature?

Thanks...
[Smart Unlock] mmonaghan34:
Works perfectly on android kitkat 4.4.2, but would be nice if there were some way to have the screen not unlock for a few seconds for switching user, other than that, great app :)
[Smart Unlock] Eru Ilúvatar:
It's fault of the security fix, see here: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=59768059&postcount=474
[Smart Unlock] weinbers:
Thanks, but I'm not running a CM ROM, just stock. That post said it works with stock.
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
We have no nexus 6 for testing, but the application has been tested on Nexus 4 and nexus 9 AOSP android 5.1_r3 (last build used on n5 and n6) and works fine so should work on nexus 6. The changes that have been made are not big. We need another N6 user that confirm if works.

Regards.
[Smart Unlock] Eru Ilúvatar:
It seems that has been merged in AOSP as well... but I really dunno.
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
nope, they have not made any changes. At least in our testing devices with the latest version of android, the application continues working as expected.
[Smart Unlock] xtract47:
I really think you should start considering listening what the users tell you. I bought the app more than two months ago because I really like its functionality but I haven't been able to use it most of the time. I am sorry, but whatever system uses now will stop working in the near future for all android versions. The fix has been merged to ASAP, as the developer of the ROM I use says :

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=60060320&postcount=7741

I know it easier to say it's not your fault but when users buy your product you should care about them a little bit more.

BTW, it used to be a fantastic app, thanks for the few time I was able to use it.

Xtract47
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
This is the latest stable version of android published, 5.1.0_r3.

https://source.android.com/source/build-numbers.html#source-code-tags-and-builds

As I said before, we have compiled and installed it on multiple devices and the app works.

In the latest version published in the android SDK, version 5.1.1 that doesn't even have branch in the AOSP, we have tested the application with the emulator forcing unlocking/locking and is working properly.

True, it has applied the same change introduced in the latest versions of CM12 in the branch "master" of AOSP three weeks ago, but it is unclear when they will apply these changes to the stable public branches, if these changes will remain over time, or if will affect in the same way that CM12.

The master branch is not stable and even these changes could be reversed any day.

We do not say we can not do anything because it's easy. We must stick to the "rules" of the operating system if we want to keep the application without being root.

If an application uses a function of external code, as in this case a important function of the operating system, and eventually the content of this function is changed from OS side, from the developer side we can not do anything, especially if the new only alternative that is given to developers to disable the keyguard is not compatible with a service that is the case of Smart unlock.

If over time the application is not running with the latest versions of android and there is no choice, we will program any solution that would involve the obligation to have a rooted device. And although we have root access does not mean we can do anything in a transparent way for the user that does not involve device configurations and others.

Since we have notified that the app is not working with latest versions of CM12 we have been looking for solutions. The best option seemed to us is the Xposed module, because it would allow us to modify the function of the OS by eliminating the keylock change. But xposed recently it has only support for android version 5.0.x and is alpha. So for now, we can only wait regarding this.

I'm surprised you say that I don't listen to users. If you have any problem with the application, you can contact us in many ways. If you look at the thread you can check if we listen and help users. You can also contact us through our support address.

Anyway If you are unhappy with the application we can offer a refund. Send me your your purchase ID by PM.

Regards.
[Smart Unlock] latino147:
yeah, I'm surprised too, because what you are stating is 100% true! :good:
[Smart Unlock] xtract47:
I am not the only user that can not use the app anymore because of this. Lots of people here at xda have custom roms installed, and most of them are cm12 based (or aosp). I think you should really offer a solution, because I am not the only one that has complained about the fact that it is not working anymore, and for sure I am not the only one that has bought it.

Is it really that difficult to offer a version here in xda that actually works everywhere? With or without root, at least you would show compromise with the users of your app.

Anyway, thank you for your response and Smart Unlock, nice app for those who can use it.
[Smart Unlock] xenonism:
If I can contribute my two cents... If it's true root would instantly solve this issue, I guess it make sense to create a root-only version of the app and then try to make the standard app work around the problem. I can't see a downside in that.
[Smart Unlock] latino147:
I agree. It might fix it for me too on my stock LP rom in which it also doesn't work anymore ?
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
Being root solves the problem, but we need to use Xposed module to work. Without Xposed we can't make it work although we have root access. Xposed was not compatible with android 5 until recently. And actually xposed is only compatible with android versions 5.0.x. and is alpha version. Lollipop has introduced many changes.

This means that Xposed is not compatible yet with the latest versions of android published for nexus 5 and 6, that are using android 5.1.0, so we are back to the starting point.

As I explained in my previous post, we have to wait until Xposed it is compatible with android 5.1.x. Once this happens we can offer a solution. At least the positive side is that we can offer more functionality to the application as root that otherwise we could not do.

My native language is not English and it may be that I'm not explaining well, if something is not clear ask whatever you want and I will try to explain better.

Regards.
[Smart Unlock] latino147:
I saw a topic on xda with a 5.1 compatible alpha of Xposed.

Another issue is that Xposed doesn't play nice with Touchwizz yet.

But offcourse you can always start with root support for all the 5.0 people to practice with?
[Smart Unlock] Dovidhalevi:
Question for all this debate: Does not Lollipop have this functionality built-in? This app gives it to the rest of us ...
[Smart Unlock] KBanause:
Yes, Lollipop does have the Smart Lock feature. But unfortunately it doesn't work with wifi SSIDs but only with bluetooth or geagrphical location.
[Smart Unlock] xenonism:
Thanks a lot for your reply and the insight. Your English is certainly clear enough for me. :)
[Smart Unlock] DFault:
Changes

I must say I dislike the changes Google has made that now stops the app from working... I really like the fact that the WiFi unlocks, I really like how the app works now but I would also like to move to newer ROMs without breaking this. And maybe it's because I don't know how it works or what it could do for me, but right now I feel that having/needing Xposed is not something I want.

Would there be any way to have the fuctionality in newer builds without adding the need for Xposed? Needing root would be fine in my book. Or maybe I should look into Xposed more...

I'd also like to comment on the statement made by Xtract47. Though I share the idea that a solution needs to be found because this problem will probably not go away in a new build of AOSP I really disagree with his statement that you guys don't listen. I think you are really doing a great job, being present and active on the forum and responding to most if not all posts!

So keep up the good work, hope you guys can come up with a solution that would work for us. And please don't give me a refund, I am still happy to support you ;)
[Smart Unlock] vaze:
F*ck... not working on CM12 OS (the official ROM for the Oneplus) either.

I was really hoping it was solved in this update, but I have just tested it and... no luck.

[MENTION=2738303]KuRouZu[/MENTION] A xposed module would work for me! I really think you should publish a version for the rooted users.
[Smart Unlock] latino147:
Don't fear Xposed! It's a great tool that offers you the ability to change some inner working of your device without having to flash a custom rom or a specified mod for something to happen.

You could use xposed with one single module -> the one that gives Smart Unlock the ability to do it's work.
[Smart Unlock] DFault:
Well, if you put it like that... Ok, if Smart Unlock would work with Xposed, that could be a reason to try it. And I guess I'll be reading up on Xposed then, because I do love my costumization. Thanks!
[Smart Unlock] Nimueh:
Xposed has always broken more then it's fixed, like themes etc.

Personally I wouldn't install it unless on a vanilla stock rom that has no other options. Xposed is evil :D
[Smart Unlock] waver1967:
why xposed ? I don't want a extra app on my phone.

can't you just make a rooted and non rooted version ?
[Smart Unlock] DFault:
Well, I'll keep hoping KuRouZu and HaZeX get it working without Xposed. I would prefer root over Xposed anyway. I don't really care if it does or doesn't require root, though. Just as long as it works. :)
[Smart Unlock] Kbzj:
I prefer the root option too. Installing Xposed means no ota or dirty flash, especially with block updates for lollipop.

And having a separate app seems like a beautiful solution to me.

Thanks for your work so far, I've enjoyed it on CM11s. Cm12s has called a timeout ;)
[Smart Unlock] easyfly:
Hi today I update smart unlock from Google play ....and now I cannot come back I try deleted data and reinstall xda version but its wrong..
[Smart Unlock] patwang0311:
Any news on this 2 bluetooths bug?

Basically when a second paired bluetooth device is connected, the first one is greyed off from the trusted device list (even if the second paired device isn't in the list). Greyed off bluetooth device cannot turn blue again even if others are all disconnected unless it is disconnected and reconnected again.
[Smart Unlock] rockafellor:
Same here, having Google play update. Also after installing new beta
[Smart Unlock] hazex:
We have just updated XDA version with same version than Google Play. Please reinstall from the opening post or the link below. :cowboy:

Download Smart Unlock XDA version - HERE - (max. 3 trusted devices) Last updated 15-april-2015
[Smart Unlock] rockafellor:
you're fast as hell :) thanks m8!:good::fingers-crossed::cowboy:
[Smart Unlock] easyfly:
Wow so faster!

Thanks
[Smart Unlock] DFault:
It works!

I dont know why, but I now have a ROM that states it's a 5.1 and Smart Unlock works like a charm!!

I have this installed on my S4 (i9505): http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s4/i9505-develop/rom-aicp-8-0-lp-5-0-2r1-official-t3026904

Alot of other versions available here: http://dwnld.aicp-rom.com/

No idea why it works, haven't tried any prior version of this ROM so not sure if Smart Unlock has ever stopped working on this or if its back. FYI: the thread title/link is not really accurate, it states an older version then actually available..

If I can supply any more info, let me know!

[IMG="Screenshot"]http://i59.tinypic.com/66i74p.png[/IMG]
[Smart Unlock] de.er:
Works for me on BlissPop 3.1 as well (it's Lollipop 5.1).
[Smart Unlock] DFault:
Ok, thats cool. I thought it'd stopped working on any 5.1 because of the Google source, guess I was wrong then... Good to hear it is still working on different places though!
[Smart Unlock] latino147:
Good to hear! :)
[Smart Unlock] TheDannemand:
I've been on 5.1 with my Nexus 5 since shortly after 5.1 was released, and Smart Unlock never stopped working for me, both with stock ROM and Cataclysm 5.1.

It's as [MENTION=2738303]KuRouZu[/MENTION] described a few pages back: Even though these changes were added to AOSP, no factory images have included them yet. Thus, they affect AOSP based ROMs (notably CM) but not ROMs based on factory images (like Cataclysm).
[Smart Unlock] dfyoung:
Results on HTC One M8

Hi, trusted Wi-Fi unlocks as advertised but unfortunately (and the reason I installed the app in the first place), I don't find it to be true that "if you press the power button to wake the device, you're immediately shown your home screen." I still have to swipe up to get out of the notification screen to the home screen, even with the "Don't show notifications at all" setting.

I also expect you know this but BLE-connected devices cause Smart Unlock to display that the phone is unlocked even though it's not since you currently don't support BLE devices.

I've experienced these results while using a HTC One M8 running CM12 (April 9th nightly).
[Smart Unlock] vaib:
Does not work on Xiaomi MI3. I am using pattern lock and on lollipop 5.1. The lock does not get disabled.

Edit:

Does not work along with proxydroid. Works when proxydroid is off.

Edit:

Sometimes does not even work without proxydroid.
[Smart Unlock] the_Calen:
Hello, I really like your app and it's working well but one thing is a little bit annoying. When I'm not in a trusted network smart unlock forces always my unlock patten even when trusted faces is enabled,is there a way other than disabling the app to use trusted faces or locations without being forced to enter the pattern?
[Smart Unlock] waver1967:
working again on htc one s latest cm12.1
[Smart Unlock] KuRouZu:
yes, they seem to have reversed the changes on CM12.1:

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/92879/

hopefully also will reverse in the master branch of AOSP over time.