yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 5 General] Wakamatsu:
He's talking about images, not the OTA. If you choose to rely on the OTA when you have other options, well, good luck with that.
[Nexus 5 General] alen1901:
Yeah, i really hope they fixed this, rebooting after few days of usage is really annoying, pokes me in the eye and whispers: go back to KitKat, go back to KitKat.

Sent from Pure Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 General] Pastorelli's:
Are you on Vodafone or Ziggo ? There might me a OTA delay by Vodafone Netherlands because of on sms bug found in 5.0.

I did not receive OTA as well on WIFI until i swapped with an old expired simcard from Telfort.
[Nexus 5 General] hayzooos:
Any, ANY possibility this will include wifi calling for T-Mobile users? Maybe, just maybe?
[Nexus 5 General] t0p8uzz:
The Cisco AP bug apparently tested and fixed in 5.0.1 for those struggling to connect to Cisco based APs/Controllers using PEAP/MSCHAPv2 etc in corporate networks
[Nexus 5 General] Rusty!:
Zero.
[Nexus 5 General] dcunited08:
Supposedly, this is the full git changelog: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/3825fc1b5207e543f564
[Nexus 5 General] hayzooos:
Bummer, didn't figure as much. Any idea if this is even going to be a thing? I've seen it talked about, but no one ever seems to have any real idea if it'll happen or not which leads me to no :(
[Nexus 5 General] fooboo:
I'm still on 4.4.4 and feel fine, regarding all complaints I read on

threads. Vanilla, no root.

When 5.0.1 comes up, would I be able to ota it directly? If google

takes off 5.0, I'd have to use a computer, which might prove a

problem, since I use unix, not mac or win. Any idea how it would

be spread across the globe?

Best regards all.
[Nexus 5 General] pcphobic:
hope Android 5.0.1 will solve the mysterious battery drain bug in Android 5.0
[Nexus 5 General] dcunited08:
I'm sure the OTA will be off 5.0, what variant of Unix are you using?
[Nexus 5 General] BRiANj64:
Edit: nvm didn't saw it correctly.

But i have no battery drain problem at all. Maybe it's the Play Services wakelock?
[Nexus 5 General] fooboo:
It is freebsd, and I have one openbsd box.

I'm a bit puzzled. Do I have to install 5.0 ota first to get 5.0.1?

Or google made brand new ota for 4.4.4 -> 5.0.1?

Best regards.
[Nexus 5 General] Yaz75:
You probably have to go 5.0, then to 5.0.1. I downloaded the 5.0.1 OTA for my Nexus 7 and it's only 17.5mb.
[Nexus 5 General] nednednerb:
I haven't read a single thing about T-Mobile's business practices. I don't care about that.

However, real ideas are not possible without really thinking.

For example, it is absolutely certain that MANY providers release special versions of OSes for THEIR version of the devices. With bloatware etc.

It is also absolutely certain that T-Mobile wifi calling is a T-MOBILE specific service. I've no "real idea" about this other than thinking for myself for LESS than a second that T-Mobile DOES at least probably mean T-Mobile.

Therefore, and I stress this isn't or may not be a "real idea"... I'm just using logic and personal cognition here.... But therefore, maybe T-Mobile has to push the update and Google couldn't care less about making T-Mobile wifi calling a working feature for my, umm, Telus Mobility Nexus 5, because, and this is a real idea, it makes no sense whatsoever.

I have ONE question, which answered, will make ideas real. You'll have to think for yourself to answer the question, along with knowing T-Mobile's trade secrets or public announcements which are surely VERY easy to find:

Has T-Mobile even released their version of Lollipop, which is not a Google AOSP generic source build for a general device, but is their self-modified, proprietary ROM, especially modified to include proprietary features such as wifi calling?

This is the most relevant question to provide real ideas about the subject matter of your original question, to which the answer is basically ZERO as another poster said.

I mean I have totally seen provider specific ROMs for various devices and various providers. Just keeping my eyes open I mean.

The above only makes clear and distinct sense to me. Does that make it a real idea?

300 years of argument haven't proven Descartes right or wrong about THAT, but I feel good about T-Mobile getting wifi calling working on their own schedule. I think it's possible!

TL.DR... be patient and/or ask T-Mobile about it.
[Nexus 5 General] asd246810:
any improvement in battery:D?
[Nexus 5 General] Yaz75:
Who knows. I didn't have any battery problems with my N7 and the N5 OTA isn't released yet.
[Nexus 5 General] lasha117:
nexus 7 has received 5.0.1 version :) i wonder when we will get it :)
[Nexus 5 General] wulsic:
Google finally started doing something on the wifi issue that it's connecting and it just disconnects again that was something from cisco ap bug related to version 2 used but it needs 3 or vice versa something like that. I am happy about that, I always had issues with the damm schoolnetwork related to that. [MENTION=2277920]Rusty![/MENTION] And [MENTION=4288306]bliizzz[/MENTION] the almighty 2x will probably have a working lollipop soon :) they came now till bootanimation but they still have to find the problem why it doesn't boot. Bliizzz the 2X was especially a pain in the ass with miui/LG Stock 4.0.4 how many bugs could've been prevented if it also got nicely upgraded to 4.1.2

[MENTION=5622265]asd246810[/MENTION] I've didn't read the whole changeslist but I guess that the battery might get a little Tiny bit improved. But they still didn't do anything about the most important bugs.
[Nexus 5 General] kennonma:
my n5 also no released yet
[Nexus 5 General] grognaz:
Whats that memory leak you are talking about? I had my last reboot about a week ago and everything seems normal
[Nexus 5 General] IVS IVRIS:
I hope I can send text messages again on Vodafone in the Netherlands!
[Nexus 5 General] 1234west:
After a couple of days your N5 will lag a little, then it gets worse and worse, having you to reboot and it'll be normal again
[Nexus 5 General] rayiskon:
So the M7 and M8 Google play edition are getting 5.0.1 OTA. My friend got it yesterday on his MotoX 2014.

Still, nothing for N5/N6, because f*** the nexus lineup. Well played Google.
[Nexus 5 General] wolfen69:
I am having this issue. Sometimes I can only go 1 day before I have to reboot. Also, the notification light doesn't work correctly. Not a good start for Lollipop.
[Nexus 5 General] thesebastian:
Well I personally consider the 5.0 and the 5.0.1 like "nightly builds". I think we need to wait more time.. for a solid android 5 release and more solid nexus 5's binaries and drivers (and even more Qualcomm updates for lollipop).

So I don't complain too much about this...5.0 is fine for me...and 5.0.1 wont change too much...maybe just the mem leak that happens every 3-6 days in my device.

Sent from my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 General] IINexusII:
Yep, this is why i am going back to the GPE devices next year, hopefully with the HTC M9

i had kitkat before the Nexus 4 devices last year with the HTC M7 GPE
[Nexus 5 General] are609:
I had this. Wiped my cache and it fixed it. Apparently in some cases the cache wasn't cleared properly.
[Nexus 5 General] rayiskon:
[

Yup, that's kinda my decision too. I've been with the nexus line for 4 generations, but i think it's time to move on. Anything close to stock like Moto/Oneplus, or GPE devices.
[Nexus 5 General] fooboo:
Imagine someone goes to the store and gets brand new N5.

He comes home and charges it. Then powers it up. He learns

it is 4.4.4. I just cannot imagine that it would stay kitkat, since

there is no ota for the lattest L. It might be, but sounds bad.

Also, if it goes to 5.0, new user will take it as a final and do

his ins and outs and expect no further update immediately.

Personally, I'll wait a bit longer to see battery consumption

on 5.0.1. It is on the very top of my list.

Best regards all.
[Nexus 5 General] rbrenart:
Me too, seems to me it's related to how often I use voice commands. However, that's anecdotal, I haven't done any real testing.
[Nexus 5 General] omricn:
Is flashing only the 5.0.1 system.img using fastboot possible in LP? (I'm stock, rooted, modifications to system - ambient screen enabled - system will be reverted back to to original before flashing).
[Nexus 5 General] McFlypants:
I did this on my n10 and it worked.
[Nexus 5 General] chrisinsocalif:
Doesn't the Google Hangouts dialer use voip using your Google Voice number? Why not use that as a substitute? Just curious.
[Nexus 5 General] omricn:
Nice, TNX
[Nexus 5 General] McFlypants:
I think you have to take a look at the filesizes of the other .img's just to be sure. On the N10 only system.img changed, so it was no problem because all other files remain the same!
[Nexus 5 General] Yaz75:
Bingo. This is what I do.

Only issue I have is when I answer a call, it takes a few seconds for it to sync up. You have to say "hello" a few times before they can hear you.
[Nexus 5 General] omricn:
Thanks buddy, will do!
[Nexus 5 General] cmhjr:
Considering that T-Mobile WiFi calling is kernel level and not ROM Specific then what does a T-Mobile releasing Lollipop ROM have to do with WiFi calling.

http://newsroom.t-mobile.com/news/t...-to-its-data-strong-network-this-november.htm

Since it seems that Google will release an update to the kernel in the future to the Nexus 6 to allow T-Mobile WiFi calling, then quite logically the kernel update would also be available for the Nexus 5.

So the original poster you replied to was justified is asking his question and the answer should have been not yet. It would logically be sometime in 2015 and after the Nexus 6 gets the update to allow it.
[Nexus 5 General] hayzooos:
Exactly why I was asking, thanks for this, very well put.

As for Hangouts dialer using voip, it sure does. Except I don't want to use my GV number, I want to use my T-Mobile number. I know a lot of people use GV number as their primary, I just don't happen to be one of them as I've had the same cell number for literally 13 years.
[Nexus 5 General] cmhjr:
It's a feature I miss also, you may want to keep an eye on the T-Mobile announcement page.

http://newsroom.t-mobile.com/news/

If you happen to be running a custom kernel then the kernel creator would have to update to incorporate it in their kernel when Google releases the kernel source.

You just may have a little patience because Google is taking care of bugs in lollipop first.
[Nexus 5 General] t0p8uzz:
Why is it taking so longer for the factory image to be released? It's been out for over a week on other Nexus devices :(
[Nexus 5 General] :
Maybe because the fixes were meant for tablets and are not relevant or important to the N5.
[Nexus 5 General] t0p8uzz:
What, there is a wide-spread issue on Lollipop connecting to PEAP/MSCHAPv2 Cisco based networks across all Nexus range, it's well documented on here and over on the Google Developers website, most of which are Nexus 5 users.
[Nexus 5 General] :
Was that particular issue fixed in 5.0.1?
[Nexus 5 General] t0p8uzz:
Yes, its the main thing on the change log for 5.0.1 after they got so many complaints
[Nexus 5 General] :
Ah right I wasn't actually aware that that problem also affected N5s because I haven't followed the Google Dev discussions.

Maybe you could try one of the AOSP based custom roms because most of them are updated to 5.0.1? Once the factory image is up you can always just come back to stock :)
[Nexus 5 General] pcphobic:
battery life seems to be better on Android 5.0.1

Perhaps Android 5.0.1 no longer have that mysterious battery drain bug anymore.

I am getting back similar levels like how i used to when i was on Kitkat.

Below is the result of my overnight battery drain test for N5X release 7.0 (Android 5.0.1)

My setup

ROM: N5X rel.7.0 (Android 5.0.1)

Kernel : Code Blue r718

Mobile Data : Enabled

Wifi : Disabled

Gps : Ebabled

Bluetooth & NFC : Disabled

Data Sync : Enabled

Result

After 8 hours of idle, it only drained 4%.

I am glad that Android 5.0.1 battery life has improved over Android 5.0
[Nexus 5 General] SREEPRAJAY:
Great to know Sir.

You have posted this over 9 times in different threads and people have understood this.

Time to stop this now.

THANKS
[Nexus 5 General] nsxalwayz:
i've been on 5.0 now for a while now. BAttery life is so random. great battery life some days and dies when idling other days. Hoping 5.0.1 fixes this and comes out OTA soon
[Nexus 5 General] Didusieq:
Nexus 6 and 4 also have received the 5.0.1. Why N5 is at the end?
[Nexus 5 General] TigerCourage:
Maybe there's more to fix than we think?

My experience with Lollipop is random. I only like the new features, design and animations. Battery life is bad and that memory leak bug gets on my nerves. Also overall the phone loads everything slower. The scrolling is amazingly smooth though.

I hope 5.0.1 improves the user experience.
[Nexus 5 General] nomancoolboy:
???????

Post of the month
[Nexus 5 General] zsocop:
Is anybody knows what is the star next to the wifi signal?!
[Nexus 5 General] tmeader:
It means you've enabled "Priority Notifications". Tap Up or Down on the Volume rocker and switch it back to "All" or "None" if you want it to go away.
[Nexus 5 General] marinierb:
Set to Priority Interruptions only.
[Galaxy S 4 Active Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thisisapoorusernamechoice:
So now that Lollipop has been released for the S4 GPE and various S4 and S5 leaks etc. etc. I know we can obviously pull some system dumps, i.e. the files and folders from /system and decompile things, but my question is, other than copying .png's over from res/xxhdi-drawables and maybe fiddling around with various res/values hex colors, does anybody have any idea for some effective ways to splice some lollipop theming into our SystemUI.apk, SecSettings.apk, framework-res.apk, etc.? Sorry if this is a stupid post, just seeing if anyone like me is too impatient for Samsung's release and wants to get the lollipop feel early :)
[XDA Assist] XDA Visitor:
if it possible without unlocking bootloader.?? otherwise give me your method
[XDA Assist] Negan:
Hello,

You can register and ask your question here if you need support.

Good luck
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] QA Bot:
Q&A for [ROM][PORT][JB 4.2.2][iPhone iOS7 ROM for Micromax A88]

Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.

Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [ROM][PORT][JB 4.2.2][iPhone iOS7 ROM for Micromax A88]. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.

Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :)
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FirmLearner:
[ROM][PORT][JB 4.2.2][iPhone iOS7 ROM for Micromax A88]

Hi SB, its me again, asking your kind permission again to post your great ROM to our FB group page (MyPhone A888g duo). Thank you in advance. Keep up the Good work! :good:
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] raaj2707:
how to see running apps means ram not shown

there is problem sir , i can't able to see ruuning app, so there i can't move my apps to sd, & idon't know also m consumed by your rom
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Micromax User:
Kernel

Sir

I did'n find the link of kernel. You mention to flash the kernel.

How can I download the kernel to flash it ???
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Joshua™:
how?

How can i know if my phone is cwm or twrp
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sml2004:
Answered
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tx_dbs_tx:
They won't delete it. You might as well think of another question and retitle this post so at least it won't be a total waste of space and people's time. LOL
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 84guy:
so. why not have the answer? can you not remove it? takes up my notification area and i dont use it. ive searched and cannot find an answer!
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mybikeisblack:
If you have wanam installed. There's an option under notification panel to disable it. Perhaps more people should reply with useful information rather than badgering someone.
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pdaddy:
If the original question was "How do I remove S-finder and Quick connect" Then this was asked in the right section. I know the answer, but others may not. We were all "noobs" at one time or another. Forum rules 2.3.
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jimmbomb:
pdaddy.....could you please give the answer??

Even IF the OP now knows the answer..

the thread title draws alot of people in..

Some people who would like to know AN answer..

Please give us your solution..

thanks!!!
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cbass15:
[MENTION=2594871]jimmbomb[/MENTION] there's the answer.
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pdaddy:
The answer was was given by mybikeisblack. This is a Q and A section. I have seen plenty of people flamed for asking simple questions. This forum is for all of us to learn. Much like asking what tweezers are for.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2981208

"Tweezers"?? in my NOte 4 box?? why?

Please move on from this. Who knows, the answers you help someone with may end up motivating them to become a hell of a developer, make their day, or just simply make you feel like a good person.

The answer:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ma.wanam.xposed

OP: just put (Answered) in the title of your post.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Heartlessangel2001:
i think i flashed the wrong firmware. would it cause the battery not to charge?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boomboomer:
Flashing a file meant for another model is usually a hard brick or the digitiser blown.

Battery not charging is likely to usually be a faulty battery, charger, lead or motherboard -in that order.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Heartlessangel2001:
Battery chareges but very dlowly usibg wall charger.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RazorMC:
Try changing the charging cable and/or charger.
[Nexus 6  General] garyd9:
So, I accidentally encrypted my device when I booted a kernel that had "force encryption." Ooops. When I rebooted, it immediately started encrypting. (No prompts.)

I tried to decrpyt, but it kept asking me for a password (which I never set up) and then would say that the password was correct (no matter what I typed), but something is corrupted in my data... and that I had to factory reset.

Sure. Bite me, Google!

Steps to recover:

1. Power off

2. Boot into the bootloader

3. Boot into TWRP recovery. TWRP see's all my data fine and doesn't ask for a pw.

4. Backup the phone.

5. Use adb to pull the backup off the phone.

6. Go back into fastboot and run: fastboot format userdata.

7. Boot the phone normally (with a kernel that doesn't force encryption.)

8. (the only reason to boot here is so that android creates the proper /data directory structure.)

7. Back into TWRP...

8. adb again to push the TWRP backup back to the phone

9. Restore the backup made in step 4.

10. Reboot again. Success. Done. Everything works fine and I'm not encrypted.

So much for security, Google. Pfft...
[Nexus 6  General] almahix:
Forgive my ignorance, I am not yet a n6 owner. What, are the disadvantages of encryption?
[Nexus 6  General] EverDawn4:
Read and write speeds are slower as all data is decrypted and then encrypted as it is used.

Sent from my Nexus 7
[Nexus 6  General] Skripka:
Also due to the extra number crunching overhead, more battery burning.
[Nexus 6  General] almahix:
I see how that is a negative. I'm surprised there isn't an easier way to disable encryption. I expect by tbe time I get one early next year some awesome dev will resolve that.
[Nexus 6  General] garyd9:
The point is that encryption has some negatives, but NO POSITIVES. What is the point of it when its so easily bypassed?

Sent from my Nexus 6
[Nexus 6  General] EniGmA1987:
Encryption does have some positives, such as more protection of your data. How you describe and what you didnt doesnt show it as having much positives though

You claim it is worthless, because you could use root access and unlocked fastboot to push and pull data and all that, but can you really do all that so easily and get by the encryption without any root access and a locked bootloader? What about a not yet authorized ADB and you cant get into the device because it is locked and encrypted (in this scenario we are trying to break the encryption, not just go into the ROM and hit accept). I think everything is easier when you already have things unlocked and full system access.
[Nexus 6  General] rlh445:
Seems pretty secure to me. By the time you got to where you wanted to be, all data on the device was gone.

Mission: Accomplished.
[Nexus 6  General] garyd9:
The ONLY requirement to repeat my steps is either an installed custom recovery or an unlocked boot loader.

I'd agree with your argument if google allowed a non-encrypted fs if/when a boot loader was unlocked (which would be simple as /data is formatted on unlock anyway.)

Instead, google forces the encryption unless you swap boot partitions

Who's to say that the boot loader lock can't be worked around by someone determined? We haven't tried yet for the simple reason that the effort seems futile when we can so easily do it with fastboot. However, boot loader locks HAVE been worked around to boot custom recoveries on other devices such as Samsung and LG phones.

Once your in recovery, as I explained above, all the supposedly encrypted data is accessible.

Sent from my Nexus 6
[Nexus 6  General] rbox:
It can be bypassed because you are using the default encryption key. If you set a pin or a password it changes the encryption key and you need to enter that in recovery to access the partition.
[Nexus 6  General] italia0101:
No positives... Lol
[Nexus 6  General] garyd9:
How many "typical" users will set a pin or password? Those same users, if they are concerned about data security, would be manually enabling encryption already.

Google (and Apple) came up with this "great" idea to force encryption on by default (and, at least in Google's case, make it the ONLY choice without modifying the system boot partition.) They claim they did this to protect data. What protection is there if Google allows the "typical" user to use the "default encryption key" and it's so easy to get the data even if "encrypted?"

I think what I'm getting at here is that I was extremely disappointed that it was so easy for me to get at my "encrypted" data using back door methods. I suspect that MOST people won't set up any extra keys/pins, and will allow the default key. They'll see that the device is "encrypted" and feel some FALSE sense of security. In fact, those people are facing a performance penalty of some degree in order to have that FALSE security.

Here's how I think Google should have done things:

1. First and foremost, don't use software encryption. Require the encryption system to have some form of hardware acceleration.

2. Instead of 'forceencryption', the fs manager should default to encryption ON if the bootloader is locked, and default to OFF if the bootloader is unlocked. The result would be that unlocking the bootloader (which nukes the /data partition and causes it to be reformatted) would start with an un-encrypted userdata partition. (The user could still enable encryption.)

3. In conjunction with #2, if there's no encryption key provided by the user, then DON'T ENCRYPT. I honestly believe that a false security is WORSE than none at all, and apparently the "default" encryption key is all but useless.

On the other hand, I hope my first post in this thread helps some user (or dev) who accidentally encrypts their filesystem while playing with kernels. Up until then, it was believed that once the userdata became encrypted, there was no way to reverse it.