yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Gear S] MDANavymom:
Just wondering if anyone else has run into this issue. When I turn on wifi at work, I get an error that says "sign-in not supported". Our work wifi requires a username and password, both of which are used to log into the network. Just wondering if this is an issue with the device or my IT network set up?

WiFi at home with encryption works fine, and public WiFi's works.

I'm thinking this stems from the same issues we having reading and replying to Corporate Exchange emails. My Exchange requires a password on device, although the Gear S has the ability to set a pin lock the whole thing stems from Corporations not being able to have access to wipe the watch.
[Samsung Gear S] Unknown Zone:
Well, you know the wifi work cause you can access internet at home and public places.

I would first ask the corp IT dept if it is ok for you to log in with a unauthorized device first to the corp network. Now days corp IT dept have very strict access to what device and who can access their network due to hacking/virus......etc. If you can the ok, then you can ask if the GS is capable of accessing corp email and how to set it up.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] monkey28rb:
does anyone know where i can find this radio only to download?? thanks
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] mixmaven:
From what I remember there was no discernible difference between 1.33 and 1.34

but YMMV

-mix
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] wpbear:
yes it is on the bottom of the WIKI PAGE OF EXTRACTED RADIO ROMS AS OF THIS MORNING IT WAS STILL THERE. Or it is in my Sig too.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] monkey28rb:
yea its there but when i go to the page to download it, it says Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /hotlink.gif on this server.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] jyavenard:
Will it also change the radio bootloader?

Will it change the radio bootloader to 1.08 ? so you can't change to any other radio version after you upgrade?

JY
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] wpbear:
the bl will be 108 but you canchange the radio with the modified romupgradeut and sspl so it doesn't matter.

I will check the my host tonite but it should be working from my signature.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] monkey28rb:
can anyone send me the radio? since i cant get it off of the wiki!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] eagle 1:
instead of clicking on wpbear's radio version 1.34.10.00 link...Right click and click save target as

or right click on wpbear's radio version and click copy shortcut and paste in to address bar (use IE)

and it works as he says...
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] jyavenard:
This link doesn't work for me either... If I directly click on the link I get an error about a missing file.

If I do what you suggest (right click, save-as) I get a 4kB file

Edit: the 4kB file is in fact a GIF file stating: "This image cannot be linked directly. Please link to the folder containing this image instead"
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] monkey28rb:
nope not working! if anyone has it saved on there comp can they send it to me?
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] jyavenard:
I finally got the file using a different web browser, couldn't get it with Firefox...
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] monkey28rb:
yup i finally got it to work
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] eagle 1:
I notice on everyone's sig line that the radio says 1.34.10.00 where as the file in the download/and pda shows 1.34.00.10 after install...is this the same radio or is there a 1.34.10.00 version?
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Dr@gon:
how can i downgrade radio rom 1.34 to 1.27 back ?
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] wpbear:
Radio Extract Wiki page bottom , NBH 1.27 Radio.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] wpbear:
It was a typo, I did it in mine too whoops.
[General Topics] hallowseve:
Ignorant people. Just because someone has a demo unit, does NOT mean it is stolen. Perhaps it would help to do a little research before pointing the finger. I'm not saying there are no stolen demo units, but more often than not, they are legit.

The stores (Fred Meyer, Best Buy, Walmart, etc.) get these units for display purposes. After their time has run and they are no longer needed, the units go to the stores return center. The return center does whatever it is that they do, and then auctions are held on lots of used electronics. The lots can include new items (shelf pulls or end of season stuff), buyers remorse items, unwanted gifts, damaged boxes, demo units, you name it. Small businesses bid on the lots, win them, do their part to refurb them, then resell them at a discounted rate. This is all perfectly legal and is how a lot of people come in to possession of a demo unit.

What did you think happened to the stuff you returned to the store? They don't just tape it up and put it back on the shelf. Now you know the process.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Ciloteille:
Very simple just as it reads in the title. Sign up.

https://www.change.org/p/at-t-wireless-unlock-the-bootloader-on-the-samsung-galaxy-note-4-910a
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Ciloteille:
Please share this and find friends that will join in on the fight for the bootloader being unlocked.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] sweetboy02125:
Signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] RichMD:
Signed. I don't know if an unlock code could be per device but if so then we could sign a warranty void clause to get our unlock code. I've seen this happen for another device.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] rduncan1974:
Is it possible to add the note edge 915 a to the petition as well please?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] zoso28:
Signed & shared.. Cmon ppl only 7 so far?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Clienterror:
I don't want to be negative, but I've used android since 1.5 and had AT&T since then. In that time I've had a few phones with locked bootloaders and I've seen quite a few petitions to unlock it and I've never seen anyone successfully get them unlocked from AT&T, it's always been boot strapped or some other method for bypassing it. Not saying don't try, but don't seriously get your hopes up. Also even if you got everyone on XDA with an AT&T Note 4 to sign it's probably less than 1% of their sales of the Note 4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] blazablaz:
Signed, sealed, and delivered bud!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] pirateye:
Signed!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Reinaldo33897:
Signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Ciloteille:
Last I checked the reason for mentioning the Motorola atrix 4g was because att released the ability to unlock it, if I'm not mistaken.

Edit: even if people aren't using att phones, it doesn't hurt to support what feels right to them. Does it?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Borgador:
Signed

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] dragunbayne:
Signed!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ryudosama:
Signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Volvogia:
Signed!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] lebertian:
Signing! And yeah, please share since like others said ANYONE can sign this, not just AT&T Note 4 owners [emoji2]
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Ciloteille:
I would be happy if you shared it on like 25,000 facebook pages.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Xak:
Signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] syngiun:
Signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] timmyhawk1983:
seen one of these every year ive had the note .. ATT wont release a bootloader .. ive seen up to 100,000 names before ... if someone wont do it on the side .. it wont be done .. GOOD LUCK ANYHOW !!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
If I buy ATT I won't expect root
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Ciloteille:
Well that kinda goes without saying now

;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
EVER......;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] brittoking:
Thanks?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] JUSMEJOSE:
Not a AT&T Customer but still signed ....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] fbauto1:
Yet another petition?

Good luck :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Android300ZX:
Done.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] spartan07:
Signed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] CB620:
You would think by now ATT users would just go with the T-Mobile model knowing ATT locks their phones down.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ReggieSmith:
only seen this sort of thing (repeatedly asking for something that the other party doesn't want to do and has no real incentive to grant) work once... and that was in a movie (Shawshank Redemption) where a character wanted books for a prison library so he wrote letters once a week for years until they gave in. The message here - he was in prison with nothing but time on his hands and it was a movie.

Seriously folks, this isn't gonna do anything or go anywhere. Carriers are locking phones down to make them more secure and thereby allow them to sell a greater number of phones to the government and companies that are concerned about security. The OEMs are more than happy to do it because the carriers probably commit to buying more.

This petition, which goes to the federal government by the way- NOT the affected carriers, will be as effective as all of the previous ones.

The ONLY thing that will change this policy is a drastic shift of customers to other carriers. Simply buying the handset elsewhere will not do anything as the carriers don't make any money on the handsets. They make money on the service.

I have rooted phones in the past and see the benefits, but that practice is no longer a necessity for me. I am content to stay stock and unrooted- especially on this beast of a phone.

Good luck on your petition. Maybe Santa Claus will intervene.. :) :good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] raduque:
I DO mean to be negative when I say that this petition could be signed by a million+ and nothing will happen. AT&T is not going to unlock bootloaders, because this guy doesn't care.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
THAT'S THE TICKET to the best of all worlds if it works with LTE
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] JasonJoel:
The petition only has like 115 supporters. This thread might add well be closed/die off. Clearly it is going nowhere.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] WizeGuyDezignz:
I agree with you. There could be thousands more and it would still go nowhere. These types of petitions have always been and will always be pointless.

I guess it makes some people feel better or that they are making a difference? I'm not sure but it's not gonna work sadly.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Ciloteille:
It didn't hurt me or anyone else to give a 5 minute span out of their life's to post a signature. Regardless if it's fruitless or it will work, it's not like we stand to lose anything.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] lebertian:
I guess we're lucky having all these smart guys telling us how difficult/impossible is to get the bootloader unlocked, I bet none of us realized that. I now see what a huge waste of time and effort has gone into signing this petition, it probably would have been better not doing anything about it and not letting AT&T know that there's people who don't agree with their practices, because that's how you change (or try to change) things. And of course we have plenty of options to choose our carrier, but we just happen to love AT&T way more than TMOBILE. After all, who really needs good cellphone and 3G/4G signal in their area?

Again, thank you guys, you're the saviors of this thread, please keep on enlightening us with your comments. Happy thanksgiving!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
Well I guess "Hope" is a good thing......Research is better. You don't need an ATT phone to enjoy ATT service and LTE.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] lebertian:
AT&T service yes (after Sim unlocking), LTE that's questionable (I've seen mixed reports). And assuming the above is 100% true, you still need around $900 in cash to get an off contract phone. For many people that's a lot of money, when you can get the AT&T one for $100 (like me) or even less if you have some older phone with better trade in value. I've said this in other threads, of course I prefer being able to root the phone, but with such a great device as this one is I could survive without it. That doesn't mean I won't support causes that will try to get root/unlocked bootloader, it really doesn't hurt.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] UniX1rm:
Signed and for all the people who are just bringing that it will not do anything, it makes AT&T aware that there are some minorities who have demands and esentially are going to switch away from the phones as soon as they get a chance when they are financially a little comfortable
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
$650 on Swappa.com. Worth every penny. LTE is questionable to those who don't know how to make it happen
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] cnote74:
Signed it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] lebertian:
Well yeah, I'm talking official channels, you can get stuff from eBay too, but who knows how that's going to end up. Even so, $650 (or $675 to $700, which is what shows now for a TMOBILE one) is still more than 600% of the cost of I was telling you. Anyways, I don't think tjat is the point of all this, the point is that there's no reason for people like you to come to this thread and post those comments as if we didn't know about all that. People with AT&T phones must have their own reasons, and your comments aren't helping the cause of this thread. You are free to make them, of course, but I'm also free to respond to them.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
Every phone I bought since the Samsung's Vibrant smart phone has been a resale on Ebay and all International versions, Never had an issue. The Note 4 is the first US phone I bought and I bought that used from a member of Swappa. I don't buy contract phones except for the hot iPhone 3GS at the time. Paid $600 for two and sold them for $1400 on ebay, Have not been under contract since.

You want an unlocked device with root and Custom recovery....They are available for less than $700

I am educating the savers here. They don't have to buy a ATT phone and sign a contract. Save some beer money every month and buy a real unlocked device.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] lebertian:
You're assuming a lot of things, but anyways, thank you for educating us, we learned a life changing lesson.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] lyrical1278:
Always easy for those who have to preach to those who have not...

If you can swing an unlocked device, then great, but you can actually get up off your high horses and show some sort of support regardless. It's not about saving money or being able to do so. Because most of you sound like the types who would be quick to quit any situation that appeared to be a losing situation fromt he start.

For those who purchased the device directly from AT&T, keep pressing forward. Sometimes the minority is the group these big companies actually DO pay attention to because we're the more educated bunch. We're the swing votes in an election to be more pointed. When the minority wants information on a purchase, these big companies KNOW the majority will ask someone from the minority.

People swear 115 signatures won't do nothing.... Last I checked, a small company by the name of T-Mobile is slowly changing the game. in terms of pricing. Whether you win or lose, at least you took the time to put up a fight.

5 minutes to sign a petition vs spending $700 on a phone? Yeah, hand me that petition...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
T Mobile is the bottom of the barrel. Anything they do is not copied by Verizon and AT&T who own the wireless market. T Mobile has been giving away the farm for years and still has not made an appreciable dent in AT&T or Verizon. That is why they offer unlocked boot-loaders, unlimited data, on and on and unlocking codes after 40 days. Thankfully they do otherwise those who want a truly unlocked device would have to buy a Euro off Expansys.

If the T Mobile does not work for me with ATT I will sell it and switch to Verizon.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] holywhitebread:
Signed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] JasonJoel:
Just curious... What good would switching to Verizon do? They lock their boot loaders too...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] arjun90:
Signed. This is REAL. ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Tuanies:
Yet AT&T and Verizon are copying T-Mobile's non contract plans and ideas starting with NEXT/Edge, and now line access discounts for those that aren't on contracts. T-Mobile is very disruptive and its working. If it weren't for T-Mobile, we'd still be forced to be on contract plans and still pay the same amount whether regardless of your contract status.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] CB620:
That would be the wrong thing to do [emoji16]
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
If I am going to pay $800 for a locked phone I want it on the fastest LTE network here. ATT says they will get the T mobile device to work although "I won't get the ATT apps" Not worried about those apps..LOL
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] jpasint:
Don't take this the wrong way but this was one of the funniest posts I've seen here on XDA.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] :
signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tbong777:
Thanks for the laugh,.......:laugh::laugh:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] KaiserDB:
I signed. :good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] soraxd:
signed, and bump. should be changed to all Samsung, or att devices tho. point out htcdev program is what we aim for. you could get 300k siggys if you did that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] grmcrkrs:
Signed it. I'm not very optimistic on this one, but a guy has gotta have hope. ..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] kawasaki00:
Signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Scotsman828:
Signed the petition. But unfortunitaly AT&T will be more likely to listen to a class action lawsuit, than an online petition.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ekinnee:
Given that they lock our devices, threaten the FCC to stop improving networks if they are forced to do something, I seriously doubt a few hardcore Android nuts will cry loud enough to make them change their minds.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] btort1:
You guys are better off selling your Note 4 on craigslist and then use that money to buy a t mobile version. The custom roms are awesome! I get 5 to 5.5 screen on time on Dynamic Kat rom

If the note 3 and s5 still have a locked bootloader, I doubt at&t will change their mind about this
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] meanhacker:
signed. hopefully this helps :good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Scotsman828:
I've already bailed on the AT&T Note 4. Purchased a TMobile version on Ebay for $650 new. Cost me $30 at cellunlocker.net for unlock code. Now region unlocked, carrier unlocked, and trying out Cyanogenmod 12. Looks like all my next phone purchases will probably be TMO models if it has the correct LTE bands.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] httuner:
These petitions means nothing, nothing at all. The only way to make this request happen is to AVOID AT&T altogether. By not using their services we might just change their minds.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] pockermj:
Signed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] joe zack:
ilike to sign dont have credit card why no paypal easier ..........................thankx
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Jspex:
Signed but it is up to samsung to unlock the bootloader iirc.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] troycarpenter:
Sighed. ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] sweetboy02125:
Why credit cards and PayPal mentioned here. No idea what yoy meant?

Sent from ♤ Galaxy Note 4 ♤ Please excuse if any typos.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] jpinks:
signed but dont think ATT gives a flying &#iT about its customers
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] TechBSwift:
If you want to be heard, start a boycott against Samsung, about locked bootloaders. If the boycott gets enough attention on the internet, Samsung is more likely to unofficially allow a leak version of the Note 4 firmware to get out, that will allow the unlocking of the Note 4 bootloaders. Samsung doesn't care about locked bootloaders, and they are not going to accept the bad PR, or the lost of more customers because AT&T and Verizon lockdown their bootloaders. We've seen many petitions against AT&T & Verizon about locked bootloaders, and they have never been successful. No one has ever played the angle about boycotting Samsung phones and having people sign a petition. Even if you don't plan on boycotting, the mere fact you signed will impact Samsung business, and they will have to do something. They've already lost so much business in the last year.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] WyldJitt1976:
I work for at&t Mobility and I can assure you the powers that be will NEVER willingly unlock the bootloader for this device. It is a worthy cause for sure, but it just wont happen
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] joe zack:
Was post it wrong side please ignor
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] holywhitebread:
English please?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] slimc84:
He posted it in the wrong thread.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] DroidHelp101:
Yes I am with you. I have seen dozens of these petitions over the years, it will never work...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] bazzar1206:
I can just imagine the suits at at$t having a laughing fit at the petition....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] jasonstackhouse:
So I wanted some clarity on this issue from at&t, called them let them know that my device sucks and without root access its just a slab of crap to me I want to trade this in for the international device or have the boot loader unlocked. The sales rep went to her manager asked some questions and than reported back to me that all Samsung devices sold to at&t are locked, if I wanted an unlocked device I would need to purchase the device directly from Samsung or I would need to finish the last few instalment pays I have on my next plan which would make the device 100% mine, not obligated to at&t through any type of contract or term agreement, once officially owned a request can be submitted to have the device unlocked from at&t. She said it takes 12-48 hours to process the request, at which time an email would be sent to me with instructions and a device specific code to enter into the device that will uninstall/disable the software that at&t sells the phone with.

OK, so if this is true has anyone done this yet? If not will some one try? And just in my personal opinion, if this is in fact a true statement from at&t and the process is in fact valid to unlock the device than this in my opinion is a great place to start working on exploiting the phone. It would mean that with basic prompt comands the device will except a numerical code and uninstall the software locking the boot loader, it would be impossible to make a billion unlock codes so the code for this is going to def have device specific information in it, let's just say for sake of an easy example the last four digits of your imei, and a general unlock code that if technical and not universal would also include your devices reigion, possibly color, anything that it has written to its hardware that identifies the device. So again this could all be BS, but if it is not and some one has done or will try to do this the method they allege could be verified and described to the community and from the sounds of this easy unlock method that can be done right from the handset modified and exploited by the community into a possible method of root. Let me know what y'all think.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] elcanela:
As far as I know, the unlock they referred to is a SIM unlock, not a bootloader unlock. SIM unlocks are more often than not done only when you've fullfilled your contract, which explains why they would tell you that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] nrage23:
The new law is for sim unlock not bootloader unlock. It will not help with root at all.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] jasonstackhouse:
Question answered thank you good sir