yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[RAZR HD Android Development] RMarques:
Thanks Z...what a replacement I'm having here!

___________Edit 1__________

Everything went well. It took a few mins to lock to the signal but it finally did!

It was so frustrating that after more than a month I still wasn't able to use L on my HD because it couldn't get network signal!

I'll keep testing it and I'll keep commenting about results here guys.

...as a side note, I'm really in love with Blisspop, it's so good!

--------------------EDIT 2--------------------------------

...and its gone again!

I ran the terminal command again and no luck at all this time...the signal dont come back and sometimes, there isnt even any network icon at all!!

...it sucks big time!

Sent from my LG G3 D855, Rooted'n Bumped, TWRP 2.8.3.0 Dark material design. Still can't decide which Custom ROM to use!
[RAZR HD Android Development] rahimali:
where exactly?
[RAZR HD Android Development] TecknoFreak:
Is at the Atrix HD general forum
[RAZR HD Android Development] SCFirefighter:
Any solution to the missing cellular data? I'm running bliss' 1219 CM12 and restarting the rild process does not work for me.

I'm going to be on the road all day tomorrow and I'm dreading it without data.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
I was just in Calgary (a city 300km away from my city) for the weekend, radio worked perfectly for me. Data, everything. No signal drops, decent battery life considering how much I used it for Xmas, etc. Running CM12-Unofficial 12-24 (last build I posted).

Merry Christmas everyone and a happy new year.

I'll post a build tonight at some point.
[RAZR HD Android Development] SCFirefighter:
Looking for it right now. Thanks!

---------- Post added at 09:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:57 PM ----------

By the way, since philz is 'no more', I want to try TWRP but even that seems to be someone's pet build project for the 926 as its not an officially supported device. Who builds it and where can I find it?
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
I still use PhilZ (the one in my sig) without any real issues.
[RAZR HD Android Development] KC69:
Looking at your sig ,C, Inoticed your baseband is different from mine. I have VANQUISH_BP_100731.020.64.21P . It looks like yours is newer as its numbers go higher. whats the diff?
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
My baseband version changed when I first flashed the CEE KK test soak. It stayed the same after the official Rogers KK update. Perhaps it's region specific versioning.

EDIT: I just noticed you're missing the _U_ which I believe is a XT926.
[RAZR HD Android Development] holipa:
i found solution in other forum.

first and second point repair my data connection on newest dhacker build ;)
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Does it survive reboots?
[RAZR HD Android Development] KC69:
GEE, ill bet thats all it is ,,,,,,DOH!
[RAZR HD Android Development] RMarques:
Sounds more like a workaround than solution...anyway, it's sort of a step forward after more than a month dealing with it! Does it survive reboots?

Sent from my LG G3 D855, Rooted'n Bumped, TWRP 2.8.3.0, still can't decide which Custom ROM to use!
[RAZR HD Android Development] TecknoFreak:
Is lollipop runs better on jbbl and kernel then kkbl ?

Reason i ask is because we dont have any of these issues been reported here.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
cm-12-20141227-UNOFFICIAL-moto_msm8960.zip
[RAZR HD Android Development] SCFirefighter:
I tried a wipe of /system and /cache, followed by a install of dhacker's 1221 and his gapps, while keeping /data untouched. No change.

Will try the same with the 1224 build you posted earlier. I really don't want to have to wipe /data. Wish me luck.

ETA: Problem persists with your 1224 build. Could this be something in /data maybe? Very odd.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Surprisingly, I'm not really having any real problems. I used GPS while I was away, worked great. Didn't connect to WiFi so I relied on mobile data. I've never needed to select which APN to use, it defaults to the correct one for me. I'm home now running the last build I posted, everything is working, radio worked on first boot after upgrade from 12-24

EDIT: Rebooted, had to restart rild but it worked just fine.
[RAZR HD Android Development] holipa:
i dont reboot device. only point first and second
[RAZR HD Android Development] sxg75:
Which Gapps, those from Dhacker? Or those Nano/pico from PA?
[RAZR HD Android Development] vladjs10:
I use from Dhacker: http://d-h.st/xC1T
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Anyone checked combination of bt and wifi? Still broken?

For me battery life is better on lp.
[RAZR HD Android Development] SCFirefighter:
I ended up doing a full wipe (including /data) with CWGSM3VO's build from last night, and still no mobile data.

Then I pulled the sim card out (phone was on), and put it back in. Tada, 4G data. I hate this crap but I'm glad I found something I can reuse and others can try as well.

Time to restore my data before heading out to the family for the obligatory post-christmas get-together! lol
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
C, have you started with optimized builds?
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
I'm using the same one.

---------- Post added at 07:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 AM ----------

No, not yet. I was starting to look into it last night however. CM12 support for 32 and 64 bit builds. Not sure how tough it's going to be to merge in my old changes for this yet.
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Could you build 64 bit for us? :D
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
I don't think our devices are capable of running x64

EDIT: Googling around and found conflicting data -- I'm not sure if it's capable at any rate of supporting x64
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
What do you think why I put big smile at the end? :D

Anyway, changes for optimized build should work. I saw in justarchi's topic that people are already building LP.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Mine are quite a bit different than his. Never was a question of can it be done :)
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
So? I'm waiting :p

I'm still using 12/12 build with hw acc aac. It is stable (except with new business calendar), fast enough, good battery life... But I suppose that you can squeeze more power from it. Till then, most probably I'll stay with current build.
[RAZR HD Android Development] RMarques:
I have gone through this stage before man...believe me, you'll end up loosing network again after a reboot and/or anytime without any reasonable reason!

This problem should be called the "iPod syndrome" because, for more than a month, our cell phones have an unstoppable desire of turning themselves into fancy iPods!
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
One more LP rom available for our devices, paranoid. Anyone tried yet? Know forum link?
[RAZR HD Android Development] KC69:
Im wondering what yall are doing different. I havent had any of those issues. All of ,Cs, roms have flashed fine. No issues that i have found. Data comes up fine. Sometimes i have to reboot, not a dealbreaker for me.

---------- Post added at 01:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:24 PM ----------

Im off to flash pa.pop. alpha1
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Pleqse let us know how pa works, any noticeable difference, etc.
[RAZR HD Android Development] KC69:
Its almost exactly like DH.s AOSP , no frills, just smooth and snappy. So far all ive played with has worked.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/82951/
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
cm-12-20141228-UNOFFICIAL-moto_msm8960.zip
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
I see that commit removes QCOM HW AAC from build.prop but would be nice to get explanations why another commit broke it? This commit cure consequences, not real cause.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Not sure. DH says it's a no-op but it clearly fixes the XT925 (well, it did for me and I just left it in place thereafter until this commit). I haven't tried recording video yet but I'll check it in the morning.
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Could you make backup of your current build and flash earlier with functional QCOM HW AAC? For example this one. As you have xt925, edit micbias in snd_soc_sms if you have whistling sound.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
BlissPop vs my CM12 build is apples and oranges. It would have to be a 1212 comparison of the same. As DH stated, the prop implementation was reverted meaning it's a no-op (there's nothing happening); I assume he means in AOSP vs CM12. Either way, I'll test with my build this morning when I get a chance.

EDIT: Was just looking through the CM12 changelog, there's a lot of telephony/telecomm patches coming down the pipe that are of interest to me (and I mean a lot)
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
BlissPop is basically CM12 with some additional features. I don't like them all but it was more up to date at time I flashed LP. Anyway, most probably CM12 from about the same date has qcom hw aac enabled.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Additional features mean additional variables. Short of going through their git (which is where?) it's still apples and oranges to me. It has to be an equal comparison if it's to mean anything.

EDIT: End of the day, [MENTION=2218140]kabaldan[/MENTION] and DH both agree that it's not used. If BlissPop uses it, perhaps it was (as previously stated) at a point in time where it "worked". Newer CM12 (and thus, BlissPop) will not have it enabled/in-use.
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Damn it. I know that is not exactly the same and that is not enabled in the latest builds. I just wish you or anyone else to test xt925 with older build. Does it work or not? If it does, then what was the reason to disable?!

Question is only for xt925 as I can confirm that works fine on xt926. From my testing, sound quality is the same, it's stable, probably uses less main cpu and drains less battery.

I had exactly the same hard time to convince kabaldan and everyone else here that micbias set to 1 really fixes whistling sound in camcorder. Probably because he/most people have different device and cannot confirm it. Sad is that no one didn't/don't believe me.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
He has an XT925 now. It's disabled in stock Moto ROMs (as previously noted) and I don't believe you're gaining all that much in the end in my opinion. I'm more interested in the new QCRIL commits anyways, it affects far more things :)
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Again, I know that is disabled in stock moto rom... I don't know why I'm wasting my time here again and why some people are so unfriendly to me?! Not exactly you... Maybe I should buy another devices and find more friendly sub forum.

We should work together to make all our msm8960s devices (not only xt925) the best as possible. Why not to use something if it's available? Like hw acc hdr, hw acc aac.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
AFAIK, this particular prop setting is specifically for encoding, not decoding. So unless you're encoding a lot of data (ie; video) I don't see where the gains are especially when it's disabled/not-used in a few use-cases. There's no way to even know your BlissPop 12/12 build is actually *using* it vs Google's AAC encoder library as CM12 does.
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Recording video is already enough battery consuming, which means... I give up.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
I don't understand Z -- if it means that much to you, then do the testing bud. I'm currently rebuilding 12-28 with the new QCRIL (based on 8974 commits) to see if it improves radio. There is no doubt that at some point, someone may loop back to the QCOM AAC encoder but Google's is "good enough" for the time being.

I know you hate flashing/etc but I'm not going to flash a foreign build to validate something that isn't (in the end) equal to what I'm working with now, there's no point in doing so because it's not the same. If I could build a 12-12 CM12 and compare it against say 12-28, sure, I'd do that. I understand that BlissPop is like most of the ROMs out there, it's CM12 with a bunch of bolt-ons to make it "custom" and in the end, it may really just be a glorified CM12 but it's not the same codebase, I can't even find their git so who knows what's been done to it.

If you read further in the commit message, DH states it's a no-op but [MENTION=2218140]kabaldan[/MENTION] points out that it breaks camera recording. Some future commit broke compatibility for whatever reason but until someone actually works on the issue, it's going to stay the same. The entire family is broken on this library, not just ours.

Since I'm no developer (just builder with some basic know-how) I can't test or even fix this issue, I have no idea where to even begin.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
I don't understand how you've confirmed it's working on XT926 or that it's even in use on your build.
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Search my previous posts, it is enabled in build.prop and showing up in logcat. Not 100% sure but in latest builds must be disabled in build.prop to work.

I don't know why I'm wasting your and mine time. Looks like that you don't read what I'm writing. On another hand at least you're answering. Thanks for that.

No, doesn't mean to me that much. It's more curiosity, wish to optimized as much as possible... I don't really understand resistance to that.

Again, exactly the same when was with micbias. I spent very, very long time to convince that it works. Even after I post records here, still was posts that doesn't work. Without my persistence, xt926 users would still have whistling sound in video recording. I was happy when I found and post solution and regret after replies.

As I posted already, the best for me is to give up. You're right, sw solution is good enough and I can stay on current build until buy new device or someone rediscovered hw acc again.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Yes, you did discover the fix for the whistling noise on the XT926 and plenty of folks, including me, tried it. Further investigation into it by [MENTION=2218140]kabaldan[/MENTION] found that the XT926 and XT925 had (iirc) differences in ALSA to do with cap/capless (going on memory here) because the discovery you made only impacted one portion of that configuration and the XT925 was still affected. That's pretty device specific, even in the same tree.

I'm not against it but rather since CM12 is still in less-than-beta stage, it makes more sense to me to get everything working properly and then come back and fix things. This pretty much seems to be the current development model judging by commit history (for example, the Samsung selinux commits, lots of them) with some cm-specific features being added as well. I'd wager CM11, 10 and previous also pretty much worked the same. A lot of the expected features of CM11 we came to know (over time) isn't there yet in CM12, not even close. There's very few "fluff" commits and a lot of platform/userland/etc fixes right now simply to get devices functional on the source L tree they use.

Nobody said "hey, let's abandon it" but rather there is a working workaround/fix/whatever for current builds while functional requirements are being worked on. This would only, in my opinion, impact overall user experience rather than something not working properly.

Nobody is wasting any time here, I'm just not the person to make this particular request work.

my two bits bud. I'm your side.
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Ok, let's try once more :D

It was working with qcom hw acc, otherwise someone would report. Me first. I'm using LP since dhacker first build. Then, recently, stopped and someone here reported. Kabaldan posted solution: disable qcom hw acc.

My original question, probably few pages back, is: why developers changed code to broke hw acc? If it's just merged because of another device, then should be reverted.
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Not to detract...

Booting 12-28 with ril-caf enabled, I believe. I based it off the msm8974 commits using ril-caf and it compiled without issue. Either way, it's booting and I'm going to try it out.

EDIT: Booted with radio right out of the gate.

EDIT: Actually it didn't. No service but at least no SIMcard messges.

EDIT: restarting rild worked

Ah well.

I did notice this in the logcat:

Line 3935: W/TelecomManager( 868): Telecom Service not found.

Line 3935: W/TelecomManager( 868): Telecom Service not found.

Line 4875: I/ActivityManager( 868): Start proc com.android.server.telecom for added application com.android.server.telecom: pid=1687 uid=1001 gids={41001, 9997, 3002, 3001, 3003, 1028, 1015} abi=armeabi-v7a

Line 4875: I/ActivityManager( 868): Start proc com.android.server.telecom for added application com.android.server.telecom: pid=1687 uid=1001 gids={41001, 9997, 3002, 3001, 3003, 1028, 1015} abi=armeabi-v7a

Line 5483: D/Telecom ( 1687): MissedCallNotifier: updateOnStartup()...

Line 6171: D/Telecom ( 1687): ProximitySensorManager: onCreate: mProximityWakeLock:

Line 6185: D/Telecom ( 1687): MissedCallNotifier: onQueryComplete()...

Line 6187: D/Telecom ( 1687): BluetoothPhoneService: onCreate

Maybe that's why there's radio issues. Late-start or on-demand service start? When I restarted rild, I saw:

Line 7633: D/TelephonyProvider( 1609): Preferred APN: -1

Line 7637: D/TelephonyProvider( 1609): dbh.onOpen: ok, queried table=siminfo

Line 7639: D/TelephonyProvider( 1609): dbh.onOpen: ok, queried table=carriers

Line 9337: D/ConnectivityService( 868): Got NetworkFactory Messenger for Telephony

Line 9385: I/Telephony( 1609): TtyManager: updateUiTtyMode -1 -> 0

Line 9477: D/TelephonyNetworkFactory-1( 1609): got request NetworkRequest [ id=1, legacyType=-1, [ Capabilities: INTERNET&NOT_RESTRICTED&TRUSTED&NOT_VPN] ] with score 56

Line 9479: D/TelephonyDebugService( 1609): TelephonyDebugService()

Line 9479: D/TelephonyDebugService( 1609): TelephonyDebugService()

Line 9815: D/Telephony( 1609): TtyManager: setting TTY mode to 0 succeeded

Line 10395: D/TelephonyProvider( 1609): Preferred APN: -1
[RAZR HD Android Development] beefx:
bug?

i’m notice scary noises from my phone when playing some music (not all tracks) or incoming calls.. he screaming very loud :(

on first builds it was ok, but now (BlissPop1.4 official, cm12 by dhacker) i notice that! whats wrong?

WHO CAN HELP ME? :( :( :(
[RAZR HD Android Development] SCFirefighter:
Is there a trick to enable the 'mark as read' text message notification action?
[RAZR HD Android Development] TecknoFreak:
Guys if you guys having so much problems just go back to jbbl and flash our lollipop for jbbl. It barely have bugs and is very stable.
[RAZR HD Android Development] pete355sb:
After I boot I have signal without any trouble but the dialer is slow and my blue tooth connects but doesn't work. If I make a call my audio goes to the hand set. Sorry if this is a stupid question but is that part of the radio issue or is it something entirely different? Love these ROMs and I can't wait to use them as my daily driver.

Edit. I think I found my problem I am flashing with an old version of twrp. I am going to update and try again soon.
[RAZR HD Android Development] Raven2m:
I had similar issues today but with cw, but keeper getting no sim error would temp fix with sim reset.
[RAZR HD Android Development] pete355sb:
I updated twrp and flashed again with the same result. I also had trouble getting into recovery now, I had to use quick boot to get there I'm glad I could down load it and revert back to cm11. Any thoughts? Any help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks.

---------- Post added at 05:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:58 AM ----------

I forgot to mention I have tried every lp ROM I could find. Cm12 unofficial , liquid smooth , blisspop and others I can't remember now (sorry guys). I truly appreciate everyone's work and look forward to future builds. I would love to use this as my daily driver now!!
[RAZR HD Android Development] Thibault1171:
Hi guys, I apologize to ask it here, but is this unofficial CM12 works good or not? Which build is actually the most stable? Is it better to wait a little bit more to use Lollipop daily?

Thanks
[RAZR HD Android Development] Zeljko1234:
Could you make guide for that, please? I suppose, it's about rsd stock jb but moto was always risky with downgrade.
[RAZR HD Android Development] pete355sb:
I reverted back to twrp 2.7.1.0 and I can now get into recovery when the phone is turned off compared to having to reboot into recovery. Strange? Any ideas or thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
[RAZR HD Android Development] lcc014:
Where is the jbbl version of lollipop ? I came across a post in this forum stating that jbbl version of lillipop would be difficult to port. So there would be no plan to do that....
[RAZR HD Android Development] palmbeach05:
You mean where is the user who is known as the "i don't look at the forums for the devices who got left on jbbl" type? Idk, but it might be wise to go look at the ahd threads
[RAZR HD Android Development] lcc014:
Thanks :)
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
Yeah, I looked at the thread for JBBL L and here's a few things that stood out to me:

- it's located within China (baidu)

- the only archive available in the thread is password protected

- the only real support thread is in Chinese

- branded Mokee (why does that name ring a bell...)

- no github that I can find

I see a lot of praise and what not, mostly keeners, but no source. One comment especially, "this guy has done things that even kkbl haven't figured out", I ask, what would that be?

Seriously AHD guys, I know new ROMs are cool and such and you're in real danger of being left behind. But this one I would stay away from unless source becomes available. It's also amusing that all the other ROM "developers" out there are waiting on source release for *this* ROM before they release *their* ROM.

my two bits.

EDIT: Ahh, [MENTION=2218140]kabaldan[/MENTION] found it and noted it's not published and/or private git. Not cool.
[RAZR HD Android Development] TecknoFreak:
Yeah I agree 100% with this statement. Is good news at the same time is bad. Make wonder why they dont have a source available for this rom and kernel since is based on a free source rom as Cyanogen.

Not cool at all.

in the other hand when I said this statement "this guy has done things that even kkbl haven't figured out" is very clear that Im refering to this rom dont have as many issues kkbl rom has. This rom is as stable as any great roms from JB to KK. Im amazed how stable this rom is true it still have few bugs but not to prevent to use it as a daily drive at least for what I have tested so far
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
The only issue I've seen to date is the radio sometimes not connecting properly on boot which is easily resolved (for me anyways) -- speaking of which, I built 12-28 with ril-caf and I noticed I get a SOLID signal once it attaches but noticed I lost LTE. Maybe something to look forward to. I'm currently rebuilding 12-29 without ril-caf as I prefer to have LTE.

As for the JBBL L ROM, it worries me that it comes from China and has no source. There's no way to know what's going on under the hood. These type of situations have a bad history in which data mining/logging has been discovered unknown to the user. Makes me want to steer far away from it (albeit, if I was still JBBL) -- The fact they're clearly using the CM device tree and not making their source available doesn't inspire me either. I'm surprised XDA hasn't jumped all over this being that they require source to be published.

But at the end of the day, assuming everything is all well and good, it's cool someone managed to put it together and get the JBBL guys on L as well.

EDIT: I hate it when my phone makes a liar of me, I do get LTE on ril-caf
[RAZR HD Android Development] CWGSM3VO:
cm-12-20141229-UNOFFICIAL-moto_msm8960.zip

- adaptive playback for certain codecs (avc,mpeg2,mpeg4,h.263)

- CAF RIL

- ADB enabled