yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] atonparis:
is it juste rom radio ?

here

http://rapidshare.com/files/18091910/RUU_Radio_Only_1.34.00.10.exe

is it juste to flash radio rom ? i think yes but when i try it say that it will install

rom 1.23.163.5 ??.

normal ?
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] wpbear:
Yes that is mine. It is Radio only 1.34 using Des SSPL. I must have not changed the text file so SSPL reports 1.23, but after install the Radio ROM reports correctly and IS 1.34
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] atonparis:
is it true ?

Is 1.27 still the 'prefered' radio rom?
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Sleuth255:
I prefer the 1.35.00.11 myself since its the absolute latest radio code available fttb. GPS functionality means that if the hardware mod works then this radio will control GPS as well.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Jygar:
Hi Guys

NEVER FLASHED THE PHONE BEFORE.

I am not really sure what I need to do up update my Vario 2 (UK) to the latest radio ROM 1.35.00.11, never done it before and really want to enable the GPS.

Hopefully if I get that done I will flash up to WMXL 0.10

Cheers for any advice.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] simple:
If I flash 1.35.11, would my BL level change from 1.07 to 1.08?

Would I lose the ability to flash radio roms using mtty?

Simple
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TamaleJohnson:
My friend had a rooted M8 which was completely stock up until yesterday afternoon. He received the OTA update and I told him not to install it until we looked around on here. Well long story short, we ended up flashing SkyDragon 2.0.1 over a completely stock and I'm assuming S-On device. It acted funny for a little bit but ultimately booted up into SkyDragon. Now he has absolutely no data, but that isn't our biggest concern. We have tried 3 PC's and a Macbook, none of our devices or ADB seem to detect the phone. I just want to help this guy restore this thing to 100% stock and be done with but I seem to be completed stumped. I have tried so many different Unrooting/Stock methods in the last 24 hours that my head is starting to hurt. Can anyone please help us out with this situation, I feel foolish that it reached this point because I've rooted numerous devices over the years and I've never had this problem. Thanks in advance.

T-Mobile HTC M8

Unlocked Bootloader

S-On
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] clsA:
If you have no data the APN settings are missing

to get adb to recognize the phone turn on developer options and usb debugging. and/or install htc sync and then uninstall it and leave just the drivers

If you want to return the phone to stock use the correct nandroid posted here >> COLLECTION of Stock backup's

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2701376
[General Omni Discussion] pulser_g2:
Well, it's time to make the announcement - the first build of OmniROM, based on Android L, has now booted.

In the spirit of "pics or it didn't happen"

This is running on the N7 2013 (flo).

Hang fire on syncing though - we're still getting everything sorted to bring an amazing experience with Android 5.0. There's a few bugs still being sorted out, so you will need a fair few patches and tweaks to get builds going.

Just thought I'd let everyone know that "it's happening" :) A big thanks to [MENTION=2162789]XpLoDWilD[/MENTION] for doing all the ninjamerging of the new repositories.

Contributing to Omni

As a reminder, devices without an active device maintainer won't be receiving L, as the core Omni team are currently working beyond capacity. We'll be adding more folks where possible to do this, but this is where we need *your* help - this is the time to try to encourage your device maintainer to get involved. We've struggled by with keeping Android 4.4 going, and without more contributors, it will take a lot longer to get to where we want to be with Omni.

We've got a huge roadmap of ideas and features, much of it on our wiki, but without contributors, much of it gets nowhere. Omni is a ROM inspired by what YOU want, but we can't make that happen without contributions from people like YOU. :)

We're looking forward to getting Android 5.0 out and in the wild as part of a custom ROM, as soon as we can, but this needs a lot of hard work, and more hands always help! Interested developers can find us on #omni and #omnirom on IRC.
[General Omni Discussion] [AltaiR]:
Great news! Why am I the first one replying?

I've read your article on the homepage about the poor quality/buggy state of Lollipop. Now we all know how Omni is about good, clean code and stability rather than being the first to release something that isn't ready for prime time(for eg Theme engine/multi-window) using hacks or "fixing" stuff by simply treating the symptoms, not the cause (pardon the analogy).

What is your opinion/solution about this issue?
[General Omni Discussion] Vlad Paul:
Great. ;)
[General Omni Discussion] UPSS !!:
GREAT !!

happy to hear that ! keep going guys !!! :D:)
[General Omni Discussion] dhiru1602:
Is that Omni with a prebuilt kernel? Or is it just an AOSP build with edited build.prop?
[General Omni Discussion] TuxDude:
Way to go guys! :)
[General Omni Discussion] claptraw:
Great job! Looking forward to lollipop on GT-I9300
[General Omni Discussion] dvm84:
Omni with prebuilt kernel I believe!
[General Omni Discussion] [deXter]:
It's easier to type L than Lollipop. Did you also complain when people were talking about ICS and JB?
[General Omni Discussion] akahroba:
very nice, keep supporting geehrc please. Waiting for Lollipop ^_^
[General Omni Discussion] anshmiester78900:
Nice to see it guys. Are you also working on one for Nexus 5 ?
[General Omni Discussion] MadL1fe:
Moto G 2013, Please!
[General Omni Discussion] itouchables:
Great jobs guys, what devices are you planning on porting first ? :D:cool:
[General Omni Discussion] manuel1992:
note ii, note ii, note ii, note ii, note ii, note ii, note ii, note ii, note ii, note ii
[General Omni Discussion] pianistaPL:
You wish ;) <Nexus devices>
[General Omni Discussion] itouchables:
Pshh.. Moto g :D haha
[General Omni Discussion] MadL1fe:
Moto g 2013 first!

nexus alredy heave 5.0.
[General Omni Discussion] justkiddinghere:
Congratulations

Note 2
[General Omni Discussion] Malaach2:
\m/

Congratz ... cant wait to flash in Note 2 T0lte
[General Omni Discussion] mutaman:
Pshh..... galaxy s3
[General Omni Discussion] raymondhani00:
omni rom lollipop

woww i have to tryy itt :DDD
[General Omni Discussion] Christendom...:
I definitely agree.?
[General Omni Discussion] ilfrick:
Whooooohooooooo!

Thanks [MENTION=3878813]jakew02[/MENTION]
[General Omni Discussion] noonecanhide:
Great news, jake! Is there any chance of omnirom for samsung galaxy S4 Mini (international version with Snapdragon 200)? I tried to get omni running using CM as example, but seemingly they did a lot of ugly CAF stuff...
[General Omni Discussion] avinash1011:
Any chance for LWW?
[General Omni Discussion] omerjerk:
Omni 5.0.x for Nexus 5 ?

Hi,

I'm an Android developer. I was just going through the Nexus 5 forum but couldn't find Omni 5.0 build for Nexus 5.

Can I release one myself ? :)
[General Omni Discussion] Testraindrop:
Check in the 4.4 Omni thread, there are some homemade builds.

I guess you simply can publish yours there too ?

Using such builds myself since December as daily driver, no problems so far on the nexus 5.

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 5
[General Omni Discussion] Chosen_on184:
Forgive my naivety, is the T-mobile he considered a part of this as well
[General Omni Discussion] Gandalf:
yes, all QUALCOMM variants of the galaxy s4 will be updated once I finish the note 10 tablet.
[General Omni Discussion] omerjerk:
Btw, just asking, is there a rule or something that we are not allowed to release one directly inside the forum ? :confused:
[General Omni Discussion] Testraindrop:
As far as I know there should be no problem if you release it in Nexus 5 Android Development Section (not "Original") with the Tag "Unofficial" in the title.

As Omni is open source you can compile and distribute it, just mention your source and changes if you have some compared to current Omni state.

Btw. if you are Android Developer, you might want to contribute to Omni directly too... Nexus 5 always needs some love :)

http://omnirom.org/get-involved/

http://docs.omnirom.org/Contributing_code
[General Omni Discussion] rskyline:
Anyone knows why ghost doesn't have omni support!?

Enviado desde mi XT1060 mediante Tapatalk
[General Omni Discussion] omerjerk:
Thanks. This is helpful.
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
ghost? what are you talking about? Some sort of app?

If there's an app that works on CTS-passing Android devices but fails on Omni that's a problem. (Since we should be fully compatible with Android and our maintainers really should be running CTS checks more often...)
[General Omni Discussion] rskyline:
Oh sorry, i meant Motorola Moto X (codename ghost)

Enviado desde mi XT1060 mediante Tapatalk
[General Omni Discussion] DC07:
By ghost he means Moto X 2013
[General Omni Discussion] jvnanu:
http://docs.omnirom.org/Lollipop_De...for_devices_before_they_can_become_nightlies:

Is the Nexus 5 an oversight on there or is there no maintainer? Or has the maintainer not updated that page? Sorry if this has been answered before... did a search on this thread for "Nexus 5" and couldn't find an answer. Thanks for all the heard work!
[General Omni Discussion] Jens1969:
Shamelessly copied from https://plus.google.com/u/0/115526355605398943780/posts/cNwVLmcFLYK, comment #9 (by Andrew Dodd) :

An oversight, partly because we want to line up a proper maintainer who daily-drivers the device.* Nearly all of the team have hammerheads (and in fact it's one of my primary devices for testing the above commits I linked), but we don't daily-driver them.* The end result is that sometimes issues go un-caught for far longer than we'd like (mako camera issues for a month or so last year as an example) and I'd like at least one person with maintainer status to be daily-driving the device.

We'll probably let it be one of the few exceptions to the "must have a primary maintainer" criteria since it's a Nexus and we have so many people who can secondary it in an emergency.﻿
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
I don't think any of us have a device.

Oversight for the most part
[General Omni Discussion] Bingoig11:
Thanks for this link, can see that Manta, Flo and Shamu are mostly ready! :D
[General Omni Discussion] Jens1969:
Wow! I just noticed that my beloved Xperia Z Tablet has changed it's state from "droped" to "droped but may". :D
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
Yeah. Not sure, other than my general burnout/absence/lack of time, why my alarm clock was listed as dropped. :)

It's so close to the other fusion3 devices there's not much reason to kill it unless I've been missing something due to my absence lately.

Main issue I see with it is that I don't think it's the primary for anyone working with it. Also, I'm not sure about the 3G pollux, as opposed to pollux_windy - I only have windy.
[General Omni Discussion] Jens1969:
Thanks for answering to my post. I really appreciate, how you and the omni team respond to the community. And the incredible amount of time and work you guys are putting into OmniROM.
[General Omni Discussion] TheeWolf:
I see that in the list the Nexus 4 is under "Done, pending testing" but there are no maintainers... What does that mean? Will it receive nightlies? The wiki page also says that for a device to receive nightlies it needs a maintainer so I'm confused.
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
Nexus devices which are still supported in AOSP tend to be a special exception since they're so easy.

We potentially have someone to do "maintainer" work on that device, but worst case we have a few backups. The issue with Nexus 4 is not one of time to put into keeping the device alive, but in terms of at least having one developer who uses the device routinely and pays attention. For example, some core camera commits screwed up mako's camera for over a month a year ago and there weren't any developers using the device routinely enough to notice.

Hopefully the pace will pick up in the coming weeks. Some changes are happening at my day job that should help reduce my stress levels (which have been so excessive lately I've gotten almost nothing done outside of work) starting a week or two from now, and one of our other core team members will be finishing graduate school which has been using a lot of his time the past few months.
[General Omni Discussion] Pump Ac7i0n:
So, ive been trying to build for omni 5.0 for ls990 (sprint g3) and ive been hit with mostly hardware/qcom/media errors. Is there anything that i can add to my tree to get it to build properly?
[General Omni Discussion] ryancell:
At the time of officially launching omnirom, will it be mostly just a stock port of lollipop at this starting point? Or has it already been customized to some degree? I have a stock Nexus 6 and haven't touched it yet, still stock so I wondered. Thanks
[General Omni Discussion] Bingoig11:
Have a look there:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=57392123

I'm running this Omni build on my N6 and several customizations are already there (not that much but the ROM is rock stable)
[General Omni Discussion] martin1984:
I'll try this ROM once I get my phone back! :rolleyes:
[General Omni Discussion] I.P:
Hi,

I've compiled it yesterday for my mako as I was curious to see it running. Is it expected/a known bug to have the "Interface" tab empty in the settings ? Or did I miss something ?

Thanks for all of your hard work !
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
I think that's a work in progress and/or it may be something that's a bug on some devices. We're focusing on 5.1 now since it seems like it's not a huge transition for the devices we already had up with 5.0 - except for CAF devices where it looks like we need to wait for Qualcomm to push code.

I wasted most of the past two weeks on the disaster that is Layers, so I've missed a lot... :(
[General Omni Discussion] I.P:
Ok thanks, I'll wait 'til you're done then.
[General Omni Discussion] hemibat:
Omni on Xoom

to the Omni development team, I look forward to having a lollipop version on my Motorola Xoom. can't wait. Keep up the good work team and thanks for all that you do.
[General Omni Discussion] rockambole:
don't know if this is ROM-related, but the trusted places (smart lock) is not working on 5.1 on hammerhead

wiped everything and started from scratch, also flashed the new radio and bootloader from factory image

however, I didn't try flashing the factory image to test, only tried with Omni.
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
Not sure if we still have a Xoom maintainer.
[General Omni Discussion] jdelano:
building for hltespr?

Hi there [MENTION=591147]Entropy512[/MENTION],

I've been building PAC Kitkat and Lollipop for nearly 5 months. Of course they make it quite simple with they're setup so I've been insulated to the steps says building CM needs.

They have official maintainers now, I was building unofficial builds, for S5 and Note 3 on Lollipop 5.0.2. So now I'd like to build OmniROM for my device.

I've been looking for a tutorial and have found some sporadic things here and there, like Porting Omni To Your Device and then posts like [Q] Breakfast Problems: Grouper

I created this roomservice.xml

Here is a text file with the terminal info file

where do I create the omni_hltespr.mk file that its looking for? (when I bunch hltespr)

for pac you make the mk file in vendor/pac/products

Any assistance would be much appreciated, Thank you
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
That would go in the device tree itself.

PAC actually has device tree stuff in vendor/pac? That's horrible...

You might want to look into the work jakew02 has been doing on lt03lte - also someone was on IRC last night asking about hlte bringup, you mgiht want to coordinate with them.

Just as a warning our CAF device support is very bleeding-edge and difficult to work with at the moment. One of my weekend projects is round 2 of ifdef hell... Right now you have to sync a different branch of frameworks/av and native for CAF devices - which prevents you from working on non-CAF devices.
[General Omni Discussion] jdelano:
Thank you replying,

OmniROM is at the deeper end of the pool :eek:

Yeah, you create a <device>.dependencies file in vendor/pac/dependencies, your pac_<device>.mk file in vendor/pac/products, edit vendor/pac/vendorsetup.sh with add_lunch_combo pac_<device>-userdebug then run getdependencies.py <device> then build-pac.sh <device> and away it goes.

I'll take a look, I was a software dev for 30 years before becoming disabled, so I can at least kinda follow the bread crumbs. :laugh:

Thank you for all your work in creating and making Omni available to the masses. :good:
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
Yikes... Well, I guess ONE benefit might be the ability to use AOSP trees with no modifications potentially, but other than that... All of those should be within the device tree on Omni.

Possibly take a look at android_device_sony_leo for an example of an AOSP tree that was very recently "omni-fied", although the kernel build process there is rather nonstandard thanks to Sony's annoying no-recovery-partition weirdness.
[General Omni Discussion] Pump Ac7i0n:
What branch would one want to sync for the frameworks/av & native? Been trying to build for a g3 for quite some time now.
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
Currently, for a CAF device (nearly all Qualcomms except for Nexus devices and now the devices based on Sony AOSP) - android-5.1-caf
[General Omni Discussion] gbman54:
great job guys and please support some of huawei phones ex(ascend mate7,g750 u10):good:
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
As usual, needs a maintainer. Personally, it's going to be a LONG time before I ever touch a Huawei device. I've owned one (IDEOS S7), and the experience was far worse than even Samsung, including constant GPL violations, which from the looks of it, they've continued with for many devices.
[General Omni Discussion] SiriusCybernetik:
How about the x86 architecture? Do you happen to know if someone from the Omni team has his eyes one of the Asus Zenfone 2?

I heard that they already published their kernel code one week after the release in TW.
[General Omni Discussion] hutchjim:
wondering if your going to make one for m7 verizon? just asking
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
Both of you should read the FAQ
[General Omni Discussion] Pump Ac7i0n:
Been trying to get a complete build all weekend and its almost finished i think, about 16 gb in the out folder. Ive ran into a halt. Its complaining about chromium org, mostly about WebKit. If anyone can provide a little help or where to look for it, it would be greatly appreciated. And if you wanted to see the errors. > http://pastebin.com/HwRVk0DK
[General Omni Discussion] xtremeprince:
Thanks best rom
[General Omni Discussion] Aayushya:
Guys, I'd like to compile for Moto G. I am new to ROM compiling, but I am eager to learn. Could some one give me heads up from where to start? I already have Ubuntu 14.04 on my Laptop, with 200GB partition. Would be great if someone could teach me! :)
[General Omni Discussion] _that:
Start reading here:

http://source.android.com/source/building.html

http://docs.omnirom.org/Index

http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Development
[General Omni Discussion] fritzcola:
I hope the lg p880 get it soon!!
[General Omni Discussion] midan:
Thank you to all the Team Omni for the speed that you had to release lollipop. You are Cool!!!!!
[General Omni Discussion] jamal2367:
Hope the hlte become lollipop ...note 3 - sm-n9005
[General Omni Discussion] NexusGTS:
awsome work guys :D . I hope the i9100G will get the android L
[General Omni Discussion] Furrydaus:
Are you that childish? Sheesh...

Anyways, will be taking a look at Omni as another platform to work on in the future. Congratulations on the successful build! :)

Omnirom came faster than I could get my hands on android L on my nexus.... Lets way for omni then :P
[General Omni Discussion] dastane:
very nice job!! good luck
[General Omni Discussion] angel7501@live.com:
Heres to hoping the G2 gets some love from its respective maintainer! Glad you guys got this rolling, looking forward to the possibilities
[General Omni Discussion] gtsfreak:
Moto E And I9300 !!!!!!!!!!

Sent from my GT-I9300
[General Omni Discussion] dajoro:
Support and thanks

Just wanted to add my suppot and thanks .. long time omni user on my phones and tablets .. looking forward to this version and ready to help with testing when you guys are ready :D
[General Omni Discussion] Entropy512:
Prebuilt (l-preview?) kernel, since the flo l-preview source is ancient

Google hasn't posted kernel source for devices that haven't received OTAs or factory images yet.

maxwen has made a lot of progress on find7 albeit with a pretty nasty frankenbuild and I don't think it's booting quite yet - using straight CAF frameworks/native (we're likely to reset fw/native to AOSP soon and then merge in CAF stuff)

Moto E is unlikely (very little developer interest) and I9300 is pretty much not going to happen. It hasn't had an active maintainer in over 6 months - so it's going away with L until someone competent starts taking care of it.
[General Omni Discussion] retiredtrebor:
HTC Sprint M7?
[General Omni Discussion] Bhaskara Rao:
Congrats!
[General Omni Discussion] ahmedelhofy:
Which one of these posts am I supposed to belive ?
[General Omni Discussion] u_know_me:
any chance for Xiaomi Redmi 1s running Android 5.0 ? :p
[General Omni Discussion] ir4indr:
Grand Quattro

Hope Grand Quattro Will Get Android Lollipop Soon.. :)
[General Omni Discussion] fix-this!:
My m8 awaits.
[General Omni Discussion] gnhuy91:
Awesome! my Moto g (XT1032) is ready :D
[General Omni Discussion] hyewiz:
+1
[General Omni Discussion] PineappleOwl:
Nice one (Y) been waiting for this :D
[General Omni Discussion] jacobnoori:
1401

Why doesn't SM-N900T get any love? = /
[General Omni Discussion] nekuy:
from eclair to lollipop

A legendary journey on gt-i9000.:angel:

We need it:good:
[General Omni Discussion] DG|Buu:
Flo Release

Awesome One.Now Release It For Flo. We're Waiting. :D
[General Omni Discussion] thewisenerd:
I tried booting Omni(android-4.4) on armani, but failed because of hwcomposer issues (something related to an IOCTL missing). Unless we get our hands on the kernel sources, and know what hackery Xiaomi has done, we can't get Omni to boot ( I might be mistaken too, yet....) What are we 'work-around'ing? liboverlay. I cannot possibly explain what it's importance is (someone else might), but as long as this isn't being built from source, things aren't going to be in sync.
[General Omni Discussion] abhiparab23:
note 1

any hopes for note n7000?:confused:
[General Omni Discussion] yasxc:
Awesome! Thank you guys! Can´t wait to have it for my p880.
[General Omni Discussion] shsagnik:
Do make a rom for tab 2 7.0
[General Omni Discussion] nikozzzzzz:
Best news I read in the morning
[General Omni Discussion] Muhammad Rihawi:
Great :)

Please developers make Custom Rom to Note 3 Neo :(

there is no custom Rom to this device :(

Please help us we really need you :)

My device model is Note 3 Neo SM-N7505
[General Omni Discussion] FunkyMuse:
Can't wait to see omni rom for my 2012 N7
[General Omni Discussion] feeq13:
Oneplus one please
[General Omni Discussion] beton87:
When Entropy512 wrote that Find7 is being prepared it means the same for OnePlus 1 :)
[General Omni Discussion] Sandivisi:
hope this build will arrive on moto g (2013)
[General Omni Discussion] Mnt-XDA:
When find 7 QHD and 1+1 will get omni lollipop love...?
[General Omni Discussion] ATMOSF3AR:
NIce, good things incoming :D
[General Omni Discussion] alisabki:
Nice... Very nice... :D
[General Omni Discussion] Lukijs:
resize that signature for the love of god
[General Omni Discussion] arismelachrinos:
is this going to be available for xperia z - yuga ????