yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Desire 601] Jopix408:
I want it to try CM11,but never mind now i cant install cm11 becouse reicovery says that my device is zara CL and its not
[HTC Desire 601] luxlun:
tester

ill be a tester for the zara ul for cm/aosp also what is multirom and how to install it on the zara ul
[HTC Desire 601] patrik.KT:
I only need tester for CL. I have the UL model. And with multirom you can boot two or more roms, which is not really usefull for now, since we dont have so many roms. I only built it to myself so I can test CM.
[HTC Desire 601] luxlun:
oh ok what is the difference between build 1 and 2?
[HTC Desire 601] patrik.KT:
http://xdaforums.com/desire-601/ori...11-htc-desire-601-t2807340/page7#post54569782
[HTC Desire 601] luxlun:
any progress on the sound part of the port?
[HTC Desire 601] tomaset22:
Zara CL or UL

Where I can find or how I can recognize that my Zara is CL or UL?

THX for all :)
[HTC Desire 601] patrik.KT:
Boot into bootloader by holding volume down + power button. On the top of the screen it should say zara_ul or zara_cl.

Odoslané z môjho HTC Desire 601
[HTC Desire 601] Diamondtron4:
if the sound was working i would genuinely use this as my daily driver, its so smooth on my UL. Keep up the good work!
[HTC Desire 601] Hedied4me:
I agree. I so badly want to ditch bloated Sense and I cannot afford a new phone for quite a while.

Sent from my cdma 4.4.2 Virgin Mobile HTC Desire 601 zara_cl
[HTC Desire 601] khaliqsaleh5:
TEST

IDK
[HTC Desire 601] MadeInNewYork87:
Cyanogenmod is this phone's only chance of surviving.
[HTC Desire 601] TerrorToetje:
Thanks

I just wanted to say thanks for the work some people are doing here!
[HTC Desire 601] TerrorToetje:
Tester

None
[HTC Desire 601] khaliqsaleh5:
Is cm12 in desire 601?
[HTC Desire 601] Hedied4me:
I did not realize there are alpha builds up already. I've never been a tester but I'm willing to try it when I get free time. How do we look for bugs/errors? I'm guessing just play around with the menus and different apps.
[HTC Desire 601] patrik.KT:
Exactly :)

Sent from my Desire 601
[HTC Desire 601] alatnet:
so im trying to build zaracl CM12 and im getting an error when running breakfast zaracl.

I'm using this guide, accounting for zaracl, to get it build: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Build_for_mako

This is the error im running into:

build/core/product_config.mk:239: *** _nic.PRODUCTS.[[device/htc/zaracl/cm.mk]]: "vendor/htc/zara/zara-vendor.mk" does not exist. Stop.

Any help is appreciated.
[HTC Desire 601] patrik.KT:
git clone https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_htc -b cm-12.0 vendor/htc

...and build one more time, it should work now :)

Sent from my Desire 601
[HTC Desire 601] alatnet:
So... I now have this:

alatnet@alatnet-VirtualBox:~/android/system$ brunch zaracl
including vendor/cm/vendorsetup.sh
Looking for dependencies

============================================
PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL
PLATFORM_VERSION=5.0.2
CM_VERSION=12-20150222-UNOFFICIAL-zaracl
TARGET_PRODUCT=cm_zaracl
TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=userdebug
TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release
TARGET_BUILD_APPS=
TARGET_ARCH=arm
TARGET_ARCH_VARIANT=armv7-a-neon
TARGET_CPU_VARIANT=krait
TARGET_2ND_ARCH=
TARGET_2ND_ARCH_VARIANT=
TARGET_2ND_CPU_VARIANT=
HOST_ARCH=x86_64
HOST_OS=linux
HOST_OS_EXTRA=Linux-3.16.0-30-generic-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-14.10-utopic
HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release
BUILD_ID=LRX22G
OUT_DIR=/home/alatnet/android/system/out
============================================

============================================
PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL
PLATFORM_VERSION=5.0.2
CM_VERSION=12-20150222-UNOFFICIAL-zaracl
TARGET_PRODUCT=cm_zaracl
TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=userdebug
TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release
TARGET_BUILD_APPS=
TARGET_ARCH=arm
TARGET_ARCH_VARIANT=armv7-a-neon
TARGET_CPU_VARIANT=krait
TARGET_2ND_ARCH=
TARGET_2ND_ARCH_VARIANT=
TARGET_2ND_CPU_VARIANT=
HOST_ARCH=x86_64
HOST_OS=linux
HOST_OS_EXTRA=Linux-3.16.0-30-generic-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-14.10-utopic
HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release
BUILD_ID=LRX22G
OUT_DIR=/home/alatnet/android/system/out
============================================
Checking build tools versions...
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `src': No such file or directory
find: `telecomm/java': No such file or directory
find: `rs/java': No such file or directory
find: `security-bridge/java': No such file or directory
find: `telecomm/java': No such file or directory
find: `rs/java': No such file or directory
find: `security-bridge/java': No such file or directory
build/core/base_rules.mk:66: *** Module name: platform.xml
build/core/base_rules.mk:67: *** Makefile location: frameworks/base/data/etc/Android.mk
build/core/base_rules.mk:68: *
build/core/base_rules.mk:69: * Module is attempting to use the 'user' tag. This
build/core/base_rules.mk:70: * used to cause the module to be installed automatically.
build/core/base_rules.mk:71: * Now, the module must be listed in the PRODUCT_PACKAGES
build/core/base_rules.mk:72: * section of a product makefile to have it installed.
build/core/base_rules.mk:73: *
build/core/base_rules.mk:74: *** user tag detected on module.. Stop.
[HTC Desire 601] patrik.KT:
repo sync && make clean && brunch zaracl

Sent from my Desire 601
[HTC Desire 601] alatnet:
nope... didnt work. same error.
[HTC Desire 601] alatnet:
ok, so i got it compiling fine now. probably missing stuff with repo sync or something.

anyway, how complete is the cyanogenmod rom?

I.E. what works and what's broken.

EDIT:

It's like the world is conspiring against me...

My VM keeps screwing up when trying to compile the rom...

EDIT2:

My VM hates compiling android roms... This is the second time that this happened where something caused the root partition to switch into read mode...

EDIT3:

[IMG="HeadDesk"]http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs51/f/2009/299/3/f/Head_desk___Forkke_by_NeoSlashott.gif[/IMG]

I give up... stupid VM... Im willing to be a tester if i know what is working and what isnt on the rom as this is my primary cell that i use.
[HTC Desire 601] JaxaPRO:
Release cm12 soon?
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
06 DEC 2014

Here is new Meterial Design Youtube 6.0.11

https://mega.co.nz/#!TopUiBqb!Pzo2JxLOgejhL6YG7j6K9dRu09pGyahgoLngJ9pQ0QA

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k397jk5w...ogle.android.youtube_6.0.11_60011301.apk?dl=0

02 NOV 2014

New Calendar 5.0

Here is new Android L Calender

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4Jn0ppWJ6VpR2VFTTRHM0pBYlk&authuser=0

https://mega.co.nz/#!Dox2FaQD!97-nBtMRtW0pPPwzngqH25tt9OMIvTYs_EtIPm5r-ws

Credit goes Here

http://gappsearly.com/google-apps/go...-calendar.html

==================================================

So Here is Google Finally Release Gmail 5.0

Just Install as a normal Apk

https://www.dropbox.com/s/8pjl4i3h764edw2/gmail_5.0_1520254.apk?dl=0

https://mega.co.nz/#!W1R3lBAR!LMPH2Wlal50ehr6unX04pf8oPQM3nlwi2z_ejvlC1ck

Credit Goes To

http://www.androidpolice.com/2014/1...-support-material-design-landed-apk-download/
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] *elmo*:
Why new thread? First was here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2924943
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
New Google Calendar 5.0

New Google Calendar 5.0

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4Jn0ppWJ6VpR2VFTTRHM0pBYlk&authuser=0

Link in OP also
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] ragz:
Thanks, just when you thought Gmail could not get uglier.. Lol

SM-G900W8 / 0x1
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] brhoomy101:
thanks

loL :D nice
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] stangdriver44:
Any mirrors? Dropbox can't handle the traffic. Try to upload to androidfilehost or dev-host maybe
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
link updated...

let me know if this work

Mega Link Included Also
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
Meterial Design Youtube

New Youtube Meterial Design 6.0.11

Link Updated In OP
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] syed.osman1992:
It is asking to Enter a Decyption key for Youtube in Mega.co.nz

It is asking to Enter a Decyption key for Youtube in Mega.co.nz

Kindly Fix it.
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
link updated in op thanks
[X 2014 General] AK47ita:
Hey guys, please watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dweww9_RF2E&list=UUB2527zGV3A0Km_quJiUaeQ#t=442

what do you think about???

This is the frame!

[IMG="moto x 2014 (2nd gen) battery"]http://i59.tinypic.com/24dhizb.jpg[/IMG]

:confused::confused:
[X 2014 General] godutch:
it was the same with the moto 360, they'll have the same explanation
[X 2014 General] shamelin73:
This looks like what they did on the Motorola 360.
[X 2014 General] Audioboxer:
What did they do on the 360/what was the explanation?
[X 2014 General] godutch:
Or their reply
[X 2014 General] Cheeseraid:
According to this app on my Moto X 2014
[X 2014 General] shamelin73:
2160 minimum and 2300 typical

same issue that the Moto 360 had when that looked at the battery.

not a big issue and not getting cheated.
[X 2014 General] Shadowdancer123:
Motorola has shown the minimum spec since the first Motorola phone I bought, the Motorola SLVR.

Honestly, this is the more honest approach, as everyone has a min/nom/max tolerance on batteries.

Difference is, only Motorola display this on their batteries.
[X 2014 General] _MetalHead_:
Do you feel cheated? I get amazing battery life out of my X, I couldn't care less what the actual rating is.
[X 2014 General] Jack Sparrow xda:
As stated by [MENTION=2422269]Shadowdancer123[/MENTION], I have also seen that they publish minimum and normal capacity on the battery of their devices. Currently I have Atrix 2 which has 1735/1785 marked on the battery.

There are some cheap Chinese phones which claim to come with 4000, 5000 MAh batteries. I have seen one such phone which started delivering only one day backup after few months of usage. Atleast this doesn't happen with Motorola, battery keeps performing consistently for much longer period of say 2.5-3 years or even more.
[X 2014 General] AK47ita:
I love my Moto X and I don't care about battery life because I have juice until the end of day.

Inviato dal mio XT1092 utilizzando Tapatalk
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] chico83:
Hi everyone

I was told that the bootloader is comparable with a bios on a pc mainboard.

that's why I'd like to know the whole changelog from version 1.00 to the latest 2.01.

Does anyone know that? is it worth to upgrade? does anyone know how to upgrade?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Midget_1990:
you really dont want to do that, unless you want a brick.

bootloader 1.xx is for g3 phones

bootloader 2.xx is for g4 phones

put the wrong one on and you have a brick.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] filippodisvevia:
If you look around on this forum you'll be able to find every answer.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] filippodisvevia:
That's no so right.

One friend of mine put bootloader 2.01 on mda/qtek 9000 and pda stuck on splash screen.

Using mamaich code suggestion (with mtty: task 28 55aa) the brick is again a pda
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] chico83:
thanks for reply. if so, what is the latest release for g3/g4 phones and their differences from the 1st version? why new bootloaders?

there must me any improvements/changes aren't there?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] chico83:
trust me, i was already looking around this forum before putting this new thread.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] filippodisvevia:
If I'm not wrong 1.2 for g3.

Anyway is'nt important from version 1.0 above.

There was problem between btl v.0.56 and Aku 2 because were uncompatible.

From version 1.0 there are not problem.

If you loock for radio stack on wiki page you can find more explanations
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] imatrix:
hi guys,

just wondering, is it necessary to have latest bootloader to load either AKU3.5 or WM6?

Cheers,

imatrix
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Midget_1990:
you need 1.xx for aku 2.2+ (or 2.01 if you have g4)

only 0.XX are not compatable
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] SpyderTracks:
Question... what's the difference between g3/g4? Is it hardware related?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] tailazoom:
How can i check bootloder version of my jasjar?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Midget_1990:
Yes it's hardware, i think its the ASIC3 chipset version.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Wiz:
Nice, and since just about nothing about the ASIC3 is documented .....
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] SpyderTracks:
O2 just sent me a replacement phone, its a g3 whereas my previous was a g4...

Is the difference worth me chasing them for a new handset? (I'm thinking YES?)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Jorgee:
Yeah, What's a G4 Phone? From what I read it is supposed to be a revised format of the ROM so it has a different format of nk.nbf file. I'm probably wrong... not sure
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Wiz:
I know some people would argue that the G4 version of Universal is faster and more stable, but I would like to see some evidence for that first.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] ady:
G3 and G4 are both the version of the DOC (disk on chip) in the universal. It serves as the main flash memory on which the OS and the Exteneded ROM resides.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] robbie76:
G3 vs G4

How does one see which version the device is? Im experiencing random hang-ups om my Uni, running helmi's 1.1 and radio 1.14.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] captainsensible2002:
Good luck with explaining that to them!
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Wiz:
So basically no added value ...
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] SpyderTracks:
ROFL! Yeah... like they'd have a clue what I was talking about lol... my unborn neice has probably got more training than a lot of o2 tech support I've dealt with ;)

P.P.S.... hope I haven't offended anyone on this site by that statement... anyone visiting this site is too good to work for those kinds anyhoo :)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Midget_1990:
well i have both, with the same rom the g3 is unstable, slow and generally a pain to use, the g4 has none of the above problems.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] SpyderTracks:
Settled then... that's enough for me! Thanks Midget_1990!
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] chico83:
less hangers in version 1.01 than 1.0??

has anyone already checked if there are less hangers in version 1.01 for G3 than 1.00?

what reasons can you tell me for upgrading from 1.00 to 1.01???? it's not really clear in this forum...everyone is talking about upgrading but no one knows the differences?!!!!

if you look in this thread of the universal wiki http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Upgrade bootloader from 1.00 to 1.01 it says how to upgrade...but not why!!!!
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] darkjedi:
I know there's a way to find out what version Wizard you have, but what about a Universal? I don't see that on the Wiki. I'm sure I have a G3 Uni as my bootloader was 1.0.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Midget_1990:
put the device in bootloader, read the number at the bottom of the screen (hard - no backlight)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] darkjedi:
My bootloader is now 1.01, it was 1.0 before I upgraded it.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] Midget_1990:
then you have a g3 :)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] N1TeSH1FT:
I have Bootloader 0.60 but I could upgrade my Uni with every released rom till Crossbow from PDAVIET. No Problems which I could track back to the BootLoader.

The only thing is, that my Uni is slow as hell, since the very first day I got it.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] tailazoom:
According to i-mate Italy, bootloader 1.01 came in respons to problems that several users had upgrading to aku2 with bootloader 1.0
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] SpyderTracks:
I've been testing this G3 I now have quite thoroughly to see if there are any noticeable differences on same radio and rom as G4 I had previous, and I have to say, it is slower on general use. Stability seems ok, but it's only been a few days.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] techswim:
I am looking for a good bluetooth headset to use with my Nexus 5, which I love. Does anyone have a bluetooth headset that they love running in with their Nexus?
[Nexus 5 Accessories] frigidazzi:
I'm curious too. I've tried several of amazon, but they all are either too small for my big head or fall off when running.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] Steve.99:
http://m.bestbuy.ca/?lang=en#/catalog/productdetails.aspx?ajax=true&sku=10260793&lang=en-CA

Been using those. Sound is OK. Battery life kinda suck but if I charge em every 2 runs it's OK.

Also they are probably cheaper on Amazon or eBay.
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Gamer4Life:
hello my friends, i have xps 4.3 207 lbl, and wanted to install a 4.4.4

i found therare many version of it and couldnt decide which rom to use, also note ths is the first time i will try to install dfferent rom on my phone

here are the roms :

paranoid nexus

http://xdaforums.com/xperia-sp/development/paranoid-nexus-t2827011

[ROM][LBL] CyanogenMod 11 weeklies

http://xdaforums.com/xperia-sp/development/cyanogenmod-11-locked-bootloader-users-t2868398

XperiaSP Locked Bootloader (LBL) Cyanogenmod 11.0

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2735975

XperiaSP Locked Bootloader (LBL) Slimkat

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2735841

also what do you think of this one

[ROM][JB][LB]MasterRom V5 WHITE & BLACK[207][Rooted/Deodexed/Zipaligned/Recovery]

http://xdaforums.com/xperia-sp/development/rom-t2837166

im complete noob, and don't want to keep tweaking bugs and fixing stuff, and installing tweaks, i have no idea :/

i want to just install a nice rmo and enjoy good performance, and stability, also good game performance ( read that many kitkat roms have bad game performance)

thanks for your time .
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] matekovacs:
I recommend OMNI Rom to you! :D

http://xdaforums.com/xperia-sp/development/rom-collection-nexus-roms-lbl-kk-4-4-4-t2908366
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TechnoSparks:
I would recommend

if you like the basic CM functionalities.

Regardless of that, testing multiple ROMs is recommended as that will give you a clearer outlook on what's better. :)
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Gamer4Life:
thanks, but i couldn't find any description about the omni rom

and@technosparks :

thank you i will install that rom after i buy a new sd card in the next few days, bcuz now i have only 1gig sd card, and that rom forces you to have a big sd card, beceause it uses sd card as internal as a new feature , and i don't like that feature
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Vinay_FXG:
My Opinion

Here's what I think about the different ROMs out there!

CM11 - Great support, lots of MODs, very stable. But tends to get laggy very soon.

AOSPA - Some great unique features, great Audio, better touch sensitivity ( All the [MENTION=4350492]neXus PRIME[/MENTION] ROMs have these features.

PAC - Loaded with all the goodness from all the ROMs, but had some random reboots but that might be my problem only!

OMNI - The ROM which is the most close to AOSP. Almost the pure android experience.

AICP - Loaded with features and honestly, overloaded. Gets very laggy, really soon.

AOKP - I'm not an AOKP lover, had random problems with AOKP.

Vanir - 4.4.2 version was absolutely brilliant. It was THE fastest and most responsive ROM out there. With 4.4.4 came lots of bugs.

CM 11s - A very nice ROM. Stable and good battery life upto an extent.

Stock Based - They are really stable and provides improved functionality over the Stock FWs. But no KitKat love for them!

Out of all these I personally prefer the OMNI ROM. :)

P.S : All these are my opinions and may NOT be how the ROM works out for others. I respect all the developers who worked behind them :)
[Android General] electech13:
As we all know Knox has been here a little while now on Samsung phones and is here to stay.

It comes under the blanket of "increased phone security" and a "benefit to corporate users" ..which is true in a general sense but we all know one of the BIG reasons and downside is its ability to detect when a phone has been rooted or modded thus protecting the carriers and manufacturer of covering warranty claims.

I'm a strong believer (as most are here in these communities) that heck, if we buy something, it's ours and we should be able to do whatever we want to it..good or bad in any way shape or form..

Now with that being said, I do understand that manufactures should have "some" rights and protections against people doing things to their phones "that push a devices hardware outside of limits for which it was intended"..this only makes sense. Why should they cover a warranty claim if I mod my phone and over clock or over volt it and fry the board!? This, I believe most of us can understand and agree on...but it *should* stop there..and doesn't.

You simply want to install alternate software for a different look and feel "of your own damn device" that you paid good money for and this voids the warranty!? Come on Samsung...

Can you imagine buying a computer and having Linux installed on it and not having root SU access? LOL...that's what we get here...it's crazy.

What I'm curious is if there is a way or maybe some foreseeable future where there is a more specific type of Knox implementation that trips a counter or warning for ONLY hardware limitations?

So something like a trip counter that only goes off if the hardware is tweaked to allow the cpu/chipset/gpu to be over clocked...or if the voltages are modded..or the speakers are modded to go louder then spec...stuff like this. Because this is stuff we can all understand makes sense to be "you do this and no warranty coverage" but to simply allow for install of root needed apps or customs roms or recoveries and that's it..it's over? That should be illegal.

I know this is more of a rant but heck it's true..there is a viable solution that is a "fair" compromise and I'm sure could be implemented if wanted..even like the new e-fuse stuff they put in some of their phones..trip something..it goes and no going back..but only for harware limitations..

Just wondering if you see a time of something like this or a company that would do this or does this even makes sense? A pipe dream probably but only seems fair because what it's turning into know is just getting ridiculous.

Sent from my *ROOTED* Note 4 SM-N910W8
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
Latest Update

Google Play Store 5.3.6 APK

Old One

Google Playstore 5.2.12

Credit Goes Here

http://gappsearly.com/google-apps/p...-google-play-store/403-google-play-store.html
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] *elmo*:
Why new thread? First and main is here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1996995
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
Latest 5.2.12 Link Update in OP
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Umair Ahmad:
Google Play Store 5.3.6

Link Updated in OP
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Rayman96:
You do not seem to undestand what elmo told you. I requested the mod to put this thread to thrash.
[Galaxy S 5 Themes and Apps] Perseus:
Duplicate of [APK][11-MAR-2015] Google Play Store v5.3.6 ~ Newest version, unmodded

Thread Closed.
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] doking23:
I flashed two custom kernels on my xperia sp, and now I am stuck on but animation.I rooted my phone using towlroot and unlocked bootloader successfully. First i had flashed http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2646193 this kernel and then this one http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2404452 but with no success. Is there a way to solve this problem ?