yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Reinaldo33897:
Seems it's easier for Chainfire to root lollipop and get SuperSu working. I know it's the Nexus but we are a step closer.

http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...gn=Feed:+xda-developers/ShsH+(xda-developers)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] fbauto1:
I'm at work right now but can you try adb pushing supersu?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] natboy:
It's because he could unlock it via the fastboot command. Just like the t mobile is unlocked thus gets root.

I'd say the biggest news out of the article is that he made a compatible 64 bit version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] harritaco:
I will give it a shot when I get home from school. I'll let you know what happens later this afternoon.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] harritaco:
Tried pushing SuperSU via ADB and received the same results.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] chronicaust:
So a kallsyms is basically a list of commands the phone is taught to understand? So if you can hijack one of these commands to push su binary you have root? Am I understanding correctly?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] pr0cl1v1ty:
I also would like to become more knowledgeable on how root is generally achieved. So this is interesting.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] harritaco:
It's something that has been of interest to me as well. I suppose if we did some digging we could easily find out.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] soraxd:
just passing this along to you guys
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ShrekOpher:
What thread was that from?

Edit: NVMD found it***************************
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] FiniteTime:
For anyone else new to the forum you click on the orange right-pointing icon next to a username in a quote to go to the post in the thread.

Surge1223 is so awesome. I really hope he gets it (and the bounty money :p).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ShrekOpher:
Device maker is enabled on the note 4.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_mapper

Vulnerability: http://www.itsecdb.com/oval/objectr...345bc448a29e896&dispn=device-mapper-multipath

This last link is just to help educate. This is a great post about DM, and how it is implemented on Android.

http://nelenkov.blogspot.com/2014/05/using-kitkat-verified-boot.html?m=1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] DamageSource:
Not to sound ignorant or anything but I have no clue if this is a good or bad thing. I read the articles and even Googled some other sources and I'm still confused if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Can someone explain what this means having dm-verify on?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] HAVOK83:
Starting to get excited
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ShrekOpher:
Start by reading the Wikipedia page, in very simple terms DM injects code into the Linux kernel.

Then go to the second link I provided and you will see that DM has a known un-patch vulnerability.

Thus it could possibly be the open door to root access. No promises yet but if Chainfire things its got a good shot then its probably our best chance right now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Tikerz:
DM-Verity that Chainfire mentioned info here

https://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/wiki/DMVerity
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ShrekOpher:
Good info, looks like it could still be a problem for root on this device. Basically it opens up a vulnerability, but might require modifying the boot loader to get the device to boot correctly. Similar to what is going on in Android L.

Basically a root script (like CF Auto) will have to unlock and root with the same code injection.

It's beyond my skill. But it's not all bad, I would say half good, & half bad. It means a root method is possible, and may even work after 5.0 update, but it may require an unlocked boot loader, right now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Drewsdad:
Possible root???

I was reading some earlier posts that were saying if a root was found for the Verizon note it could possibly work for ours. I was just on chainfire's sownl9ad page and saw this. I checked build numbers and it appears to be the non developer edition. Any thoughts?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Kyuta Syuko:
Apparently it's for the Dev edition just using the wrong model number? If you read above the download list it states "If you have locked bootloaders, flashing one of these will probably brick your device."
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Drewsdad:
Damn

I figured it was to good to be true. I know flashing the wrong zips with these phones will usually brick them. I'm just hoping against hope right now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] FiniteTime:
A question brought up by this thread over in the Q&A section has me thinking:

http://xdaforums.com/note-4-att/help/note-4-ar-unchained-t2941842

What's stopping us from flashing a vulnerable kernel (and other vulnerable parts) from a T-Mobile image? (Since I think that's the closest to our device type, since it's also CDMA.) The Verizon users might be able to flash vulnerable stuff from a Sprint image. There's probably an obvious reason why it won't work but... What is that reason?

EDIT: Oh wait, is it because the kernel isn't signed for the AT&T device so flashing isn't possible. DANGIT.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] basicmods:
Also - AT&T isn't a CDMA carrier (verizon and US Cell are). T-Mo and AT&T are GSM/UMTS carriers (like most of the world).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] FiniteTime:
You're totally right. Typed that just before bed. I wanted to mention that T-Mo/AT&T are GSM and Sprint/Verizon are CDMA, making each pair similar. Hm, well here's hoping it doesn't take too long for a privilege escalation kernel CVE to come out.

EDIT:

Just saw these very informative posts from the Verizon thread:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ShrekOpher:
Good news today

https://plus.google.com/113517319477420052449/posts/K7n4e1q5SMD
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] brittoking:
I don't fully understand the implications for our device (on 5.0 it looks like it could certainly benefit us possibly) but it sure seems like a big step in the right direction for keeping root going for a lot of people using a stock kernel etc
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ShrekOpher:
Before this was figured out, the only way to get root on an Android 5.0 device was to modify the kernel, which requires and unlocked Boot Loader. Since on the AT&T version of the Note 4 there is basically 0 chance the boot loader will be unlocked, especially since the bounties are all focused on root, this can give the users who want root, but don't care about an unlocked boot loader some hope that even if the AT&T Note 4 gets Lollipop before it gets root, they can still get root in the future.

However judging by the fact that no one has found root for the device yet, it makes me think that even with the bounty where it is right now, it may not be enough to attract someone to get root. Seems like most of the devs just picked up the T-Mobile version and are working on custom ROMs, etc, and not working on finding root for the AT&T version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] fbauto1:
Bounties are joke. (Please note I signed up for the bounty to help devs).

We could have $10,000 in bounties. I bet only $500 will be paid. Devs are not stupid. They know bounties are never real. Just my .02
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] pr0cl1v1ty:
Fbauto1 ...this is the exact reason I started to collect the bounty. But apparently it is against the rules to do this.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] tampaboy1984:
I feel like devs are giving up on us At&t users and our devices. I should've just bought the Note 3
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] JasonJoel:
You can always sell the note 4 and just buy something else...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] whoamanwtf:
Yeah, just wait for the Nexus 6 stock to stabilize and then sell your Note 4 and get a Nexus 6.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] deathshead:
Guess you weren't privy to the S5 bounty?

Devs aren't stupid, but what IS stupid is sitting an an exploit if you know someone might beat you to it.

Sometimes its not about the money either but all in REP. that REP opens up many doors.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] RaptureVeteran:
im just flat out buying a nexus 6 over the note 4, doesnt seem like finding root for this thing is motivation to devs all of a sudden, probably doesnt help that nexus 6 was released within the same time span of this phone. refuse to be stuck on touchwiz and ive spent a lot of time lurking on here waiting for some root news to be released by friday but reality is, its not coming, no one is finding root on this device
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] holywhitebread:
If you look through the other threads and the Verizon Dev threads, users are actively seeking root. You guys act like it should happen over night...chill out and let the people work without giving them flack. Good luck with the Nexus 6 and no SD card option, BTW.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] fbauto1:
Exactly. That's why I said bounties RARELY matter.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] mircury:
Ya, to be honest until the bounty here gets to well over $60k no hackers with original work will take a second look at this. They would be stupid to divulge their work specifically for this bounty or even a group of them. In 2012 exploits for android sold for around $30k-$60k on the gray market (Governments/Intelligence org's/Mafias/Cartels). With advances in Linux/Android security as well as Android's popularity this is most likely much, much higher now; probably closer to what iOS commanded in 2012 ($100,000 - $250,000).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] mr64fixit:
srsroot report a lot of fake roots, definately not root N910AUCU1ANIE, waste of time.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] vw671:
I don't care for the Nexus 6, rather have a Note4 so I just bought an unlocked Tmobile Note4 no Swappa to replace my AT&T version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] FiniteTime:
Uh-oh, thread necro. All the action is going on in this thread:

http://xdaforums.com/note-4-att/general/galaxy-note-4-root-progress-t2961974

Lock please!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Stryke_the_Orc:
Locked at request of the op.
[Amazon Fire Phone] SnoopyII:
I searched here and didn't find a list. I think I will experiment and see how much bloatware I can freeze.

Anyone else willing to experiment and post their list?
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mitsosJL:
Hello guys

Which sd card do you use and which one would you recommend me ? (32gb, and with high speeds)
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] electrash:
I use Sony 32GB -10 UHS-1 class.

It's fast like hell.
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sucker for sony's:
Dont use a scandisk 64gb they get to around 40gb full and then they die, ive just killed mine with 54gb of data on it. I think upto 32gb uhs are good but the 64gb sdxc and upward cards seem to be having teething problems.
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mnsk:
I had used transcend 32gb class 10 card without any problems. Now using 64gb one without any issues yet.
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jacker60:
I have a 64 GB adata class 10, it works very good and so far i dont have any problem with it
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jasonsc1:
Hello Guys,

Any Help or Links to Related Threads will be much appreciated.

I have a Verizon NOTE 3, JB 4.3 SM-N900V MJE. I got it back around March 2014 I believe. I almost immediately Rooted it via Kingo. I do NOT have a Custom Recovery (although I would Love to install Safestrap) I also Froze the SDM app (updater app I believe) & Knox Notification app via Rom Toolbox.

Here is my Question, Since I still have Not upgraded to Kit Kat (although I want to via SexTape/Hashcode version) will I be able to Upgrade to Android L, Lollipop? Will I need to Upgrade to Kit Kat 1'st before Updating to Lollipop? I have been Real Nervous about taking the Plunge to Upgrade to Kit Kat (My old Razr got stuck in Boot Loop, Never got it out) but I want to have Android L at some point. If I Defrost the SDM & take the Verizon Update to Android L, I'm pretty sure I will lose Root,

I basically want to know What do I have to do to get to Android L, Lollipop & keep Root with my Note 3 still running Rooted JB 4.3 at this time?
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Afro Samurai:
Android L is not an option right now and who knows what Big Red has in store for us once they release it. Knowing Verizon I'll have a new phone by the time it gets released for the Note 3. But if you want to go to KK see this post here....http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=55241731&postcount=2 and here....http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2787627
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jasonsc1:
Thanks for the Reply, I already have the Link saved in my Favs, I'm just to scared to take the Plunge for fear of a Boot Loop.

I know that Android L is not an Option YET, but I've read on other Android sites that it should be released late November. Even if that doesn't pan out I want to have a Plan in place or at least know How or What my Options are as to getting it. I'm starting to Wonder will it be Better to Not receive the OTA when it does come out & wait for the Wonderful Developers here to make their own Version with Root, because I'm guessing if I did take an update I would lose Root & it will be a while until someone achieves it through Lollipop.
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] donc113:
It is ALWAYS a good idea to wait for the good guys (the developers) to get and trst any new release.

And just because Google says lollipop will be out in late Nov doesn't mean we'll ever get it on the VerizonNote 3.

Until both of the above mentioned are true, no sense planning on anything.

And if you're scared to go to KK I'm not sure why you wouldn't be even more afraid to go to L. Just saying.
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jasonsc1:
Yeah that's kinda what I was thinking. As far as Verizon releasing Lollipop, I've been reading about Verizon Note 3's & Android L on several Android sites, Android Central, Android Authority, etc. I know that we probably wont get the update as soon as I've read. Verizon is usually the Last service provider to release the updates. I did do a lil more searching & now I'm reading that it may be April, May, or June for us Verizon Note 3 owners. As far as a Plan, what I mean is I want to at least know what I will need to do or what my Options are to get Android L when it does come out. Which is why I'm asking so early.

#1 Can you go from JB to Lollipop? or Do you have to upgrade to Kit Kat then go to Lollipop? Or does everyone just Not know right now because it hasn't been released yet?

Oh & Yes I am scared to Update to Kit Kat right now but

I will do it

. I am going to. I think I'm looking for some encouragement that nothing will go Wrong. LoL. I will do it though. Its just I've never actually flashed any ROMS or anything. I had a Razr I rooted & I rooted my Note 3 almost immediately but as you know that process is not that hard or complicated. Did you Flash your Note 3 to Kit Kat? If so, How was the process for you? Any kinks? Setbacks? Any OE on it?

I do have another question you may be able to answer now that I am on the subject. Should I do a FDR before Flashing to Kit Kat??? Will that make the process more likely to succeed? Also I installed the Xposed Framework a couple months ago, will that have any effect on Flashing the Kit Kat? Do I need to uninstall it before going to Kit Kat & if I do flash Kit Kat will I still have the Xposed Framework if I do Not uninstall it? Also Do you have a Link to just install SafeStrap? I want to go ahead & get it installed & play with it a little before flashing Kit Kat. I'm gonna search for a Thread on it now. Dont worry about posting a Link I will find something. If you could help me with those other questions I would really appreciate it. Thanks for your replies. I'm a Semi Newb wanting to further my knowledge on this. I love this stuff. lol :D Thanks a lot!
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] donc113:
#1 no on knows at this point.

If you're going to restore to factory....then simply take the OTA to update to KitKat and then use Towel Root to root it.

All the answers you need are in this section of the forum....and guides are in the general section.
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jasonsc1:
I didn't say I was going to do a FDR, I'm asking if I did would it increase the odds of Nothing going wrong if I Flashed the ROOTED Kit Kat version that is on XDA. BUT I also didn't know it was Possible to Root Kit Kat. Back when I rooted my Note 3, It was Not possible to Root Kit Kat. NOW I'm curious, I thought if you do a FDR that you would NOT Lose Root? True or False? Because I'm thinking if I didn't lose Root, Did a FDR, accepted Verizon OTA TO Kit Kat, that Knox might would Trip. I don't know but I think it might. Do you know? The only other Negative to performing a FDR & accepting the OTA is I could Never go back to JB, & the SD card Problem Verizon Kit Kat was having but XDA version did Not have. Although they may have fixed that issue by now. I think it's just Best I dig back in there & do a lot more reading since I last did because so much could have changed since then. Thanks & Sorry for all the Questions. Again I said I'm a Newb
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jasonsc1:
Hey, I've been thinking about what you said. The accept the Verizon OTA Update for Kit Kat, then Root with Towel Root. If I was to do that Right now & I'm Rooted would Knox Trip?

In order for me to do that, Would I have to UnROOT 1st?

If I do a FDR would I lose ROOT? I don't think I would but I'm not sure.

Accepting the Verizon Update & Rooting afterwards sounds easier than, Installing SafeStrap, & Flashing KIT KAT. I'm not sure if it would be, but it does sound easier.

Which is Better? Verizon Stock Kit Kat vs XDA Kit Kat version???

Thanks
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] donc113:
All the information you want is in this forum and the general info forum.
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jasonsc1:
Ok, I'll see if I can find anything
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ZPaul2Fresh8:
I found this over at the general Note 4 forum.

Looks like a service menu where you can enable HD voice or VoIP on LTE.

I know AT&T is rolling out their HD voice network starting soon so the people in those areas might find this very useful.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] ericshmerick:
The APN is "nextgenphone" as well. That's new.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Jspex:
Link?
[Android Apps and Games] Unknown_Games:
Build the highest tower of tetris bricks!

Try to build a tower of tetri bricks as high as you can. Move and rotate falling bricks to build the highest tower. The bricks obey realistic physics laws, so be careful. Do not let your tower fall over!

Get it on Google Play:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dunknown.tetritower

Screenshots:
[Android Apps and Games] Unknown_Games:
Game was updated to version 1.0.1

- Fixed crashes on Main Menu screen

- Fixed crashes on Game Over screen
[Android Apps and Games] Unknown_Games:
Game updated to version 1.1.1

New features:

- Leaderboards. Compete with your friends!

- Achievements.

- Share your results with your friends in Facebook, Twitter, Google+ and Vkontakte.

- Bugs and crashes fixes.
[Android Apps and Games] cuartas:
looks nice, I'm gonna try it
[Android Apps and Games] TomBayley1:
Nice app, i like the graphics
[Android Apps and Games] Unknown_Games:
Game updated to version 1.1.2

- Bug fixes

- Achievements progress now saves offline
[Android Apps and Games] Doninn:
nice game
[Android Apps and Games] MattdwGames:
Nice game, its like reversed tetris :)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zuaro:
Hi, I own a nexus 5 since February and the last 2 months it sometimes reboots itself or gets stuck in a bootloop. I can fix it most of the times by simply plugging it into my pc or a power source but it is quit annoying while i'm traveling.

- I run the latest franco kernel build

- I'm rooted on 4.4.4

- I'm using xposed for some small statusbar tweaks.

The problem existed before I flashed franco as a kernel so I don't think that would cause the problem.

Does anyone have experience with this problem?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
Sometimes power button does get stuck buy also sometimes software causes issue.

Try and flash back to stock. If it still occurs, likely its hardware. If not, software
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zuaro:
Going to try that tomorrow morning!
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blakeslee14:
if it's hardware, flash back to stock, unroot, and lock bootloader. Call google, they'll have a new phone out to you the next day. then you just have to ship yours back. very speedy!
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Burrid:
I've seen a lot of N5 phones with a powerbutton problem, mine included. I've been so stupid to tell on the phone I opened my back to try to fix it myself, and now I have to buy a new nexus 5. I did eventually buy a new one but it has a yellow screen and now I have to RMA it. Not really pleased with the N5 quality anymore..

Don't want anything bigger than 5 inch, and don't feel like buying non-stock phones. So I have to buy it again, even though I fear it's another 400 euro down the drain in a year. sigh...

Would try iphone 6, but 800 euro is just too much :/
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
What is a non-stock phone?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Burrid:
Something like samsung with touchwiz and physical and capacitive buttons. Or htc with a big logo bar taking screen estate and sense. Motorola is ok, as it it close to stock. Sony is meh because of software and not that big of a community.

So apple is also a stock like experience with large community, but don't feel like spending a huge amount of money on a phone.

But I've just went on another nexus 5 forum and also the latest post is about a sensitive power button. Every nexus 5 forum I go to has a lot of power button issues in the top posts. Seems like the N5's lifespan is just about a year. And that holds me back from buying a new nexus 5. Because even though it's only 400 euro here, if it breaks after a year I could get a phone of 800 euro and hold it for 2 years, and then sell it...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
Oh, you mean vanilla.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Burrid:
Ah yes, sorry.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
No worries. I hear ya on that score.
[T-Mobile HTC One (M8)] bonsuego:
Hey everyone, I'm having trouble completely understanding the process of installing a custom operating system on my phone.* There's already one custom OS installed which was on there when I got the phone from a friend.* It's running Android HD Revolution, but when my friend installed that OS the wifi on the phone stopped working.* I'm confident it's just a software problem, but I need some help getting started on this.* I want to install ViperOneM8

This phone is already rooted, and the android version is 4.4.4.* What firmware do I need to be running in order to install that ROM?* How do I know what firmware I'm currently using?*

Thanks in advance,*

HTC User
[T-Mobile HTC One (M8)] Tigerstown:
You need to boot to your bootloader an there you will see what os your running plus hboot,radios,etc.
[G 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] macaumen:
I saw the Moto G EXT on Consumer Cellular website.

https://www.consumercellular.com/Info/PhoneDetails/619

It looks exactly the same as Moto G (2014). Doesn't anyone know the exact model number on it? Is it the same as the XT1064? Thanks.
[G 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] diamondjoker5:
Just got my moto g ext today. I can confirm that the model on the back reads xt1064 , fcc id IHD56QB2 type: M0FBB
[G 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GaryP2:
Hi diamondjoker5 - does that Moto G EXT from Consumer Cellular have much bloat on it?

I'm a new Consumer Cellular customer and was thinking about getting a Moto G 2014 for my wife. I'd like to ensure timely Android updates and was going to get an unlocked phone directly from Motorola. I don't know if Consumer Cellular will slow down that update process or not.

The only Consumer Cellular app that I'm aware of is My Consumer Cellular, which is actually pretty useful for their customers.