yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Zwulf:
https://plus.google.com/104403662984367760234/posts/j2S6YaQxNvB

Tapagetalkt via Mahdi ROM vom i9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Lukijs:
Use liquidsmooth if you want those features
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Horoscope:
guys which app do i need to use to diable touch buttons backlight
[Galaxy S III Android Development] aldus320:
Liquidsmooth breaks themes, mahdi doesn't
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andjeomilosrdja:
You can read at least the page you are writing on.

You need custom kernel.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Pug123:
Deleted....
[Galaxy S III Android Development] grafenberg:
how come i never get any camera issue on this rom?

so far everything works just great...

thanks dev....:good::good::good:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] wlting:
after i try clear camera cache, it work fine... and so far this S3 kk custom rom unexpected - STABLE... :cool:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] pankycool123:
rom is just excellent all i can say...... only one FC i m facing is when i clicked in notifications options in setting FC message is coming. any solution.

rest is awesome........
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Zwulf:
Does anyone know how to get the default wallpaper (black stripes) as a file? Would like to use it on my PC, too... Thanks in advance. :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andrewwright:
Pull it from the drawable-nodpi in framework-res
[Galaxy S III Android Development] bigadicking:
I cant disable navigation bar. I am very frustrated. I use mahdi's android l theme
[Galaxy S III Android Development] grafenberg:
Maybe you accidentally enable it on some xposed modules...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Sale_:
Hey CFI great work my friend [emoji106] [emoji106] Keep it up
[Galaxy S III Android Development] bigadicking:
May be I couldnt disable it though I disabled it from both on gravity box and on settings. Everytime I restart the device it was coming back :) Tne only solution was to make do a factory reset
[Galaxy S III Android Development] lsalamun:
The only camera issue is when trying to change storage to external sd, this gives cannot connect to camera issue, other than that, very good.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Nabeel_n85:
I can't see hardware button settings in the settings menu. Any idea??

Sent from S3 powered by Mahdi 4.4.4
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gtsfreak:
External SD card not working not even showing mount option how to fix it???????:p:confused:

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
But final means that there will not be newer versions?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Vivek_Neel:
Lollipop
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Nabeel_n85:
Anyone care to answer plz.

Sent from S3 powered by Mahdi 4.4.4
[Galaxy S III Android Development] S1ay3r666:
There are no Settings for that. Use a custum kernel like boeffla to disable it!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] lsalamun:
Works perfectly fine for me, full wipe?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gtsfreak:
Yes full wipe still no luck will flash again

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
just try out today, performance is no doubt! NO DOUBT!

for those who really knows temasek rom, this is the only 1 over performance vs temasek, i aren't blaming temasek anything due to he is always try to help us S3 user, most of the time are blind build... im very appreciate him much, i change rom for only 1 reason, he is quite S3 because of no device with him... anyways, this rom has the responsive of ori android had, the feedback speed of opening app, the animation fps... truly nice...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
no doubt on battery life too, 1st 50% over 10hours gave me over 2h screen on... will having full list after next charge...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] wlting:
waiting your battery life report... also want hear from other user how this battery life compare to stock rom?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
Oh damn... i forgot that im taking result, i charged awhile because of later will be out side whole night... will take another result tml.

anyways, wifi on 80% of the time in my this cycle charge.

Discharge from 5am until now 5pm, 12Hours discharge, 3hours 40+min screen on, left 18% battery. this 18% should be enough for me stay 8～10hours standby.. my standby drain ～1.5% per hours get reading from morning.

edit: again, browsing with chrome(～1Hour), facebook(～15min only), xda(～1Hour), world war(over then 1 hour)... roughly to be like that... btw, a lot gmail notification lol...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] wlting:
for ur current experience, is this rom battery life better than other stock rom? for me I feel slightly higher usage than other stock rom...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
btw, i didnt mention any stock rom here, stock sammy for S3 always a piece of s***. the most screen on time is roughly 2hours below 3hours for sure, my best result on stock is below 12H discharge, ～2.5H screen on, ～2.5%/h standby battery drain. but this is with old modem with new* phone on stock, only aosp can make our phone more balance between power/battery friendly.

my best record on cm11 was roughly to be like my current reading i post above..., which i try to get best reading, so i stop gaming, because gaming give a lot different story.

anyways, my best battery reading was a year ago, that on *temasek unofficial cm10.2*, i able to get 5Hours on screen over 16Hours discharge, 0.5%/Hour battery drain. temasek can hit 7hours and more over 1 cycle charge, his standby drain is 0.15%/Hour, so he has totally a flat line over 7hours sleep time, ss shown over 20hours discharge with 3hour 43min screen on, battery left 50%. But it just a history now...

p.s. i remember that time was archi start time join in xda, and learn a lot from temasek, so he start make his own S3 history, and he also manage to get those crazy battery reading... they all posting ss for proving. CM10.2 truly battery friendly a lot, but a lot micro lag flying around, and snippy～ so i guess its true to get that snippy because sammy release until android 4.3..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] AngelusPT:
Torch toggle? Where is it? Also videos being black bug is in this rom also. Other than that is very good rom. Congrats
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
haven't seen any video playback problem, try use mx player
[Galaxy S III Android Development] AngelusPT:
its not whit user videos, its example, facebook feed videos play in black, and youtube videos also.

to be able to see them i need to put in fullscreen.been hapening since temasek latest versions..:(
[Galaxy S III Android Development] grafenberg:
try this --> check "disable hw overlays" under developer options....

works for me... :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] aykutaykut128:
Nice
[Galaxy S III Android Development] AngelusPT:
Now my chrome is acting weird, opens windowed always.. :/
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
that because u updated to latest chrome, as i know, its version 39. i just use titanium restore my old chrome... currently no solution...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] AngelusPT:
Yep confirmed. Weird that theres no fix...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
actually there a reason for that, i read it but forgot which thread i read... anyways, it seem due to google chrome is including the function for further use on android 5.0 for whatever reason(i forgot).i think will be fix if quite number of people report to them.

But i suggest you stay at v38 chrome, its more less ram handle with smoother i can see... the best part is it wont open in window mode...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
here my battery reading in this ROM

ROM version :-

MAHDI 2.9 final

Kernel setting(personal setting, don't follow):-

Boeffla Omni V2.4 Beta 7 with minimum 500mhz running frequency, -75～-100mV on CPU, own self GPU setting on 233～440mhz running frequency with -75～-100mV, and also some tunning over governor (force 4core running when screen on).

enable Frandom.

Some Others staff/setting:-

tick on force GPU rendering and Disable HW overlay.

force 16bit transparent and allow purging of asset.

sign out for unused Google+, hangout.

Although i sign in 3 Google account but i only sync which needed on devices.

GPS on all the time.

here are my screen on

i could have better standby if i found better modem for my phone...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ebrahem khedr:
Best rom

thank you for this awesome Rom :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gtsfreak:
How's your nav bar recents button working as mine isn't showing nav bar recent button???????:confused:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MD500:
Know bugs???

Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
got get setting under setting, button... i just change inside... u need to enable it to show.

erm... currently i have no bug...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gtsfreak:
I don't understand I'm getting back nav button menu nav button but no recent nav button can u help me to fix it???????
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
im sure you are a lazy person, you should go explore yourself before asking...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gtsfreak:
See I'm not getting recents tab:rolleyes:??? I did whatever you said still same error

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
i willing to help out, but if u don't give good feed back, i cant help at all.

what you mean by *see you are not getting recent, you don't even post a screen shot, what should i see?

and what did i say as error? i don't get what you mean.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] shaawjee:
Hi Bro,

May i know which kernel you are using.

thanks in advance.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
Boeffla kernel latest beta release

PS: btw i change back to Temasek ROM already... if you want know more, just try PM me or talk at temasek thread~
[Galaxy S III Android Development] grafenberg:
I guess this build is not for flashoholics out there... :D

The ROM is final version. Currently have no bugs. With archi kernel the battery life is 9 to 10 hours.... :thumbup:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MD500:
Any know which are working and not working incluiding know issues in this ROM? I heard that google chrome ,youtube,facebook are not working properly and camera is having issues(cannot connect to camera)i will consider this ROM as beta release(no stable release)...and this ROM uses r4p0 sources and hwcomposer working? Thanks for readme and appreciate any constructive answer!

Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Code124Y:
when i was on this ROM, everything is working as it shuold...

camera working over camera fix.zip

can be found at HERE, download and flash the omni ROM zip
[Galaxy S III Android Development] racky29:
Everything works with this rom

Ive not yet found anything that dont work

And features are amazing

This is rock solid

Im using boeffla 2.4 beta 8 kernel with it, its nice

Finally found a rom that hasent got something broken. Good work here
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Arifcatalyst:
Which Boeffla Kernel ? Omni, Ng or Cm ?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] rashsalmn:
Just installed the ROM. So far it works great. Battery life seems like a concern.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] racky29:
I installed boeffla cm11 2.4 beta8 NG, but some post before said use omni based, but this normal one is working great

---------- Post added at 10:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:36 AM ----------

Battery life for me is excellent. Same as the standard cm11
[Galaxy S III Android Development] racky29:
Which one is correct, omni kernel or cm11 kernel, can anyone shed any light on this

I thought if I'm using the wrong one I should see some negative effects, or it probably shouldn't boot.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Occasus:
Try the Omni one. There was a discussion about this a few posts above yours.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MD500:
Which kernels are compatible with this ROM? (archikernel,agni kernel,arter kernel,boeffla kernel -I think?-)

Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Stevica Smederevac:
You have 4 yes;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MD500:
Hw composer is working?,no problems with camera?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] dreamaddict:
Camera no problems, hwc i don't know
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andrewwright:
No. Hw composer doesn't work on any 4.4.4 ROM for Sammy device's. Devs may have this working on 5.0 but not yet tested fully I don't think.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] racky29:
OK, so I asked in the boeffla kernel thread which kernel edition should be used for Mahdi ROM

I read through this thread and saw that some are using cm11 based kernels and some are using Omni based kernel's

And most seem to recommend omni based

Lord boeffla kernel developer says we should use CM11 based kernels and NOT Omni based kernels. Even though omni kernels will be usable, We should stick to using CM11 based kernel's for Mahdi Rom.

And a person called code124y, said using omni based kernel gave problems tuning Pegasusq governor. And down on responsiveness.

Hope this help's mahdi users
[Galaxy S III Android Development] grafenberg:
Is there a way to turn off button backlights with stock kernel?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] kamikaze702k:
No LTE i9305 support?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] grafenberg:
Bump...
[X 2014 General] Vultorus:
I'm just curious on this one.. because I haven't seen a single rom for this phone yet.

Is it just because the owners feel like it doesn't need it? That's the page I'm on.

I'm just using xposed modules on stock. Just curious what others are doing?
[X 2014 General] shamelin73:
have not received my new 2014 model yet but on the OG X stock was fine. Motorola did an excellent job.
[X 2014 General] eksasol:
I don't recommend it. For one your will lose your warranty. Secondly, Motorola adds many useful features, if you install a custom rom you will lose those features which is what made the phone great. You might as well get a different phone in that case. Also there aren't many roms for this phone, I recommend getting a Nexus if you want to install custom roms.
[X 2014 General] AndroidMilos:
I won't be installing a rom. I have flashed so many different roms on my other Android devices including the Nexus s, 4,5 that I am tired of flashing roms. I am getting the "pure" version which is supposed to be closer to what the nexus has and if so, then I see no sense in romming it. Of course I will miss Gravity box and Exposed modules but from what I have read, Motorola has done a great job is keeping the extra bloat off as well as installing lots of useful stuff. I have ordered mine and am waiting for it now.
[X 2014 General] gotzaDroid:
Not on this phone. I threw CM on my N5 because I didn't lose anything by adding it. This phone, I'd lose all the moto hands free stuff and that's why I wanted this phone.
[X 2014 General] _MetalHead_:
The original Moto X was the very first phone I've owned where I didn't want to flash a ROM on it, its software was already perfect. The new Moto X is even better and I can't really see how anyone can improve upon it. All I've done to it was install Xposed and made a few tweaks with Gravity Box (added quick settings tiles, shrunk the navbar, expanded desktop + pie controls, custom navbar button with application launcher, long press back to switch to previous app). For me, it's absolutely perfect. What I will do if it's possible, is install MultiROM and flash L with it, just so I can see if I like it on the X before I decide to make it my daily driver. I'm an "if it ain't broke don't fix it" kinda guy, which is why my original Moto X is still on Jellybean. So to answer your original question, no I don't think the X needs a custom ROM.
[X 2014 General] erikiksaz:
We don't need roms now, but with Xposed's future being a bit shakey post 5.0, we might need roms then.
[X 2014 General] jeremy702:
There are some things I miss about CM.. expanded volume control, their notification switcher bar options, etc. Little things. The ROM on the X is great, but I want to add more to it and I liked how CM seemed seemless. And I want root (VZW.. sad panda face)
[X 2014 General] Vultorus:
That is my worry. I'm expecting a lot of things to break after Lollipop drops. I'm sure the base ROM will be tight because it's Motorola, but any root apps are going to need a lot of work before they are to the point they are at now. I'm sure most xposed modules won't work anymore since it's a whole new runtime.
[X 2014 General] Sdobron:
Remember Google was looking to buy CyanogenMod, Inc? Maybe they took some of the better features for 5.0. I'm happy with Moto X - flashing all the time gets old...
[X 2014 General] Kallb123:
Whole custom rom seems unnecessary, but unlocking bootloader and root seems like a must to me. So many things aren't present in "pure" Android. GravityBox fixes that though. Excited/Dreading Lollipop... Can't want to try it, but I feel like I'm going to miss Xposed and GravityBox.
[X 2014 General] _MetalHead_:
No Xposed modules will work on L, as Xposed doesn't work on L and the developer doesn't seem to have much interest in updating it. So yeah, once we get L, we can say goodbye to Xposed.
[X 2014 General] Vultorus:
I'm not even sure if I'll be accepting the OTA when it comes out. I'm probably going to wait quite a while. I'm surprised how little talk I've heard of incompatibility. They are changing the runtime, doesn't that mean most things will break? (Obviously Devs have had time to get their apps ready.. but still.)
[X 2014 General] Kallb123:
Hopefully we can make a full backup and then update, I would really like to try Lollipop but I'm afraid I won't cope without xposed :P

That's not entirely true, he is looking into updating it, he's just not giving any guarantees.
[X 2014 General] shock2sys:
I'm with agreement that this phone doesn't need a fancy new rom. It's great as it is. "course, with Lollipop that is suppose to have the functionally of what Moto X has baked in now... A rom that tweaks, improves and/or expands on that functionality might be something to have.
[X 2014 General] Faruko:
No, you only need Xposed if you want some custom stuff, the stock rom mskes everything works, sure some stuff would be cool but thats why xposed is for (hope they updated with ART)

I started to... hat... Not like custom ROMS, in every. Single. One. Of. Them theres a thing that just doesnt work or it dies with the next update

Always

(At least on my experience)
[X 2014 General] durrell12:
Nope. Rooted stock is perfectly fine for me. Last time I ran a custom ROM on an Android device I ended up lost in a city I wasn't familiar with because there was a bug in that ROM with GPS. Never again.

That's why I love Moto devices..no need to flash custom ROMs since I would only flash in the first place to get to "pure" Android.
[X 2014 General] benjamin.j.goodwin:
Rooted stock has been bloody good to me. The only thing I'd like is a stable, decent custom kernel. Something not feature heavy but more of a tweakable stock. ROM wise I don't care, apps help me get round anything I need. I just rooted to remove some apps I hate. And change my font to roboto light.
[X 2014 General] Diesel779:
How did you guys root your Moto X 2014? If you don't mind me asking.

Edit: Just read the only way to root is to unlock the bootloader. I only received my device on Friday and I'm not prepared to lose the warranty on it. If it had some horrible skin on it like Touchwiz then it would already be rooted, but I'd only want to root this device for a few Gravity Box tweaks than I don't consider are worth voiding my warranty for. Especially when xposed won't work for a long time, if at all once L gets released. I'd basically be voiding my warranty just so I could use xposed for a few weeks.
[X 2014 General] Chris Hansen:
You can probably get most of these things via Xposed now. GravityBox offers expanded volume control. And I believe your second feature as well, though I'm not exactly sure what you're referencing.

For those of you on the fence about L/5.0 so far... I've installed it on my Nexus 5, and I am a flashaholic. I would change ROMs every few days, sometimes multiple times a day. Once I installed Lollipop on it, I haven't gone back. It is really, really well done. It could use a few minor things here and there, but overall, I am very impressed with it, and can't wait for it to release. I'm tempted to go back to my Nexus while I wait for the X to get it, because I'm having withdrawals.
[X 2014 General] Kallb123:
Voiding warranty is a bit of a grey area. I've never had actual experience, but it seems obvious that a hardware fault would still be covered under warranty. Unless it's related to having the bootloader unlocked I think Motorola would still be alright with it. I've come from a Sony phone and they seemed sensible with that kind of thing.
[X 2014 General] Diesel779:
Thanks.
[X 2014 General] Kallb123:
Don't blame me if the warranty isn't honoured though :P I'm just saying common sense :)
[X 2014 General] godutch:
Really in doubt, I am getting sick of big ads, I can block them on wifi but not mobile and there are a few cool xposed modules but how long with it take before xposed is ready for lollipop. On the other hand I bought the device from a german retailer, getting warranty is a pain in the ass anyway...
[X 2014 General] matt99017d:
He also said the same thing with KITKAT. At the time he was very blunt and honest with the community. He flat out said if you want to use exposed stay on jelly bean. Looking at history I'd say that he did an excellent job in updating
[X 2014 General] varun.gid:
Seeing the excitement of people waiting to jump on Lollipop am sure Xposed developers will make it happen.

About Custom Roms, Why not. I would prefer a Moto X based custom ROM just like they have with Samsung's Touchwiz. Clean up the ROM keep the awesome Moto features and few tweaks to make it solid than ever.

If not ROMs I hope kernels come out soon, esp since moto has released kernel source now. A good Kernel would definitely increase performance and make battery life better.
[X 2014 General] CUBENSIS:
Unlocking bootloader on the pure edition will not void your warranty. See these two links:

https://forums.motorola.com/comment/805908

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=55476642
[X 2014 General] Johnny Wong:
The Moto ROMs are very good because they are so close to stock. Just have to debloat and done. So as long as you can root, the stock rom is more than enough. Rooting the phone is a whole different story, the easiest is to have an unlocked bootloader, then you have full r/w permissions. As far as custom rom goes, I've played with paranoid's and it is very good. They've managed to add some great functionality that has a stock feel. For me, it is a cleaner solution than having to find a xposed module for every little customization I want done. Gravity box is very good but the option to customize the signal bars doesn't work for Moto phones as an example. Lollipop is going to be a game changer since it seems to incorporates the best of Moto roms, ie. Active display and Touchless. So at that point, I will most likely flash to a custom rom. At the moment with KK, the stock Moto works best for me. Unlocking the bootloader is key and being a Verizon user, my options are limited. I'm not going to pay full price for a phone just out of principles. The upgrades are a part of the cost I pay Verizon every month and I'll use it. I could get a phone off of the upgrade and then sell it to cover part of the cost of a pure edition but that is too much work in my opinion.
[X 2014 General] Faruko:
When people say "debloat" the ROM of the moto x, what do they mean ?

The only extra stuff are the Moto Apps and if you delete them why did you buy a Moto X in the first place
[X 2014 General] OliveJeans:
The bloats are for example migrate, play games, play newsstand, play books. etc.. Just those things you never needed

_____

sent from XT1092