yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Android Development] zvezdasss:
Which version is for cm 13 nightly ?? And what is u541 u621 u700 ?

Послато са A0001 уз помоћ Тапатока
[ONE Android Development] laura almeida:
Read people, READ!!!

This is not a support forum!!
[ONE Android Development] Shadowghoster:
Laura you know that it's not worth the effort telling it again and again even though you're totally right :D

Just to answer the question: u stands for Uber Toolchain and the number behind it for the version 5.41, 6.21 and 7.00. Besides that which version is for which ROM just look at the OP as Laura said: everything is there you need (even an explanation about what uxxx etc. means)
[ONE Android Development] laura almeida:
You know I don't make appearance in xda.

I rarely do.

It's just lately I have been seeing a lot of these same kind of questions, I am just fed up with these people.

xda used to be great, but now a days, people just come here to make their phone "cool"

This is a kernel development thread for developers and people are coming here asking what does 'U' stands for ?

Do you know how stupid that is ?

Lately I have been sick and I didn't had much leisure time to be on xda, when I do make time and visit my fav threads to see what's going on, I have to go through 30-50 posts of these kind!

And YOU, why do you always find the need to spoonfeed these people ?

I have seen you spoon feeding a lot in other threads too like in R.R thread!

Why do you do that ?

You know you are encouraging them, right ?

Btw, I am blabbering here only because this is my friend's thread. And I know he don't mind me being a drama queen! He is probably used to that by now!
[ONE Android Development] thecoolkid:
Hey [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] :)

Can u do 5.2 stable from 16.09? :)

It supposedly decreases average load by 10%, I bet it's good for battery ;)
[ONE Android Development] Shadowghoster:
[MENTION=5331708]laura almeida[/MENTION] as I said I totally agree with you. I sometimes spoon-feed because those guys never stop and ask again and again (just look at the RR thread) and when you say something about using the god damn search either some folks cry after you gave an more or less harsh answer or the lazy guys in the thread get pissed off and spam about how poor and uncomfortable they feel with this kind of answers and "attitude". Spoon-feeding isn't good (especially in kernel threads) but sometimes it just prevents unnecessary OT **** talk by others. Last time I raged a bit after reading the same question 5 times over 5 pages and it produced tons of OT comments about me being rude. It's just the mass of people without the knowledge (or just lazy) nowadays posting on XDA who more or less force people to just give the answer. They don't want to search they more likely flame on the thread about why nobody answers directly and spent time on this instead of actually taking a look on the answer they got.

Sorry for long OT post [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] I hope you don't mind. Thanks for all your effort ;)
[ONE Android Development] laura almeida:
[MENTION=5368959]Shadowghoster[/MENTION]

10 Points for Hufflepuff
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

well this time i wasn't sure if i even can do all the builds because there were troubles (hence the delay and not all builds yet), anyway

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.2-CM13.0-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-5.2-COS13.1-bacon

OOS version follows soon...

...uploaded

Changelog:

- l541 (l531 exchanged), l494 images now build with the more recent 20160912 version of "Uber-Linaro" (thx to [MENTION=5169465]DespairFactor[/MENTION] for the pre-builded tc!)

- u700 graphite optimization removed (bootloop fix) and still build with 20160421 version as still no-boot situation with 20160912.

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] coloured_chalk:
Hello!

I just wanted to figure out how really `cafcam` boeffals kernel version has ported color os camera drivers.

I tried to see commit logs, and compare branches, but no luck

[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] Hm.... did you ported color os camera, or that changes were by Lord Boeffla?

may be... do you remember, in which version color os camera drivers were ported on boeffla kernel?

P.S. `color os camera drivers` === `cafcam`

P.S.S This? https://github.com/zanezam/boeffla-...a2b/drivers/media/platform/msm/camera_oppo_v2
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes changes r done by me. this is a product of helping [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] a bit with porting (i fixed some little things for the port)

so this version is mainly ment to be for his rom and was only tested with his rom:

http://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-cm-12-builds-t3045053

and yes changes r in this branch right:

https://github.com/zanezam/boeffla-kernel-cm-bacon/tree/boeffla_v5_cm_u541_cafcam
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.2-OOS2xx-bacon

...uploaded

Changelog:

- Uber Images build with recent 20160912 versions.

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] thecoolkid:
Hi [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION], thx for the builds!

I have a following issue: after flashing build u700 or u621 the "Vibration strength" option disappears from system Settings. It works just fine with official Boeffla kernel 5.2. Isn't this option supported by your builds? I'm using ResurectionRemix ROM.
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
hmmm dunno if there is a problem im not removing stuff but i might break stuff with my builds. i have to check that.
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Nethunter Pack!

Hi Guys,

i just want to inform u about that i uploaded a updated nethunter pack (20160922_223608) as of 22.09.16

Changelog:

packed with recent installer/app versions from 22.09.16

possible solution for app "removed" and subsequent install problems after manually installing any of the pack included apps

(thx to [MENTION=5331708]laura almeida[/MENTION] for coming up with the solution!)

added atheros ath9k module loading helper scripts (located in /data/local/nhscripts)

description HERE

have fun!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
I still need to help you on the other project...
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
thx mate meanwhile i actually think that there is no need to do any rom integration directly

with the installer we can put all the needed things in every rom and r more flexible when it

comes to updates and deciding what u want to install. just my actual 2 cents. ;)
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
Hmmmmmm what project? Do tell ??
[ONE Android Development] Fataldose:
Hey [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] I did install your kernel 5.2(cafcam) on jgcaaps latest build. Everything is okey but camera not works. I thought cafcam works with jgcaaps cm13. am I do something wrong?

---------- Post added at 01:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:49 PM ----------

Jgcaap
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
It should work.. I've used caf/cam before without issue.. Though possibly an older version?
[ONE Android Development] gianton:
Here it is with original kernel.
[ONE Android Development] NeGriTa79:
Why am using the same settings ... My frequencies used are these?
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
most the time it's up to 729, while deep sleep and 300 are the most used states.

touch boost frequency is also used a little and the max freq... but overall its mostly at or below 729...

that looks a bit weird... maybe an app running uses so much power?

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] gianton:
If it's after a reboot give it some time till it settles down. Mine is the same after a reboot.
[ONE Android Development] NeGriTa79:
No I restarted the phone ... But I had to reset the frequency to date ... And now ... To see which frequencies used me now ...
[ONE Android Development] SaschaKH:
Do you really want to compare his results with probably more than 1 hour DoT with yours of not even 3 minutes?

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
just had a random reboot, here is my last kmsg

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Beta 9?
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
yep, linaro build... last kmsg says that no errors were detected...

is it normal that the system tries to take down core 0?

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Actually not that's the problem :) but I think I saw such a problem in recent posts in ak's thread and he reverted something but I would have to check what it was and if it's even relevant here.
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
phone was in screen-off idle state when the reboot occured. noticed it by having to type my pin again...

here're my cpu states after the reboot:

==========

CPU States

==========

2,46 GHz (): 59 s 1,1%

2,27 GHz (): 26 s 0,5%

1,96 GHz (): 28 s 0,5%

1,73 GHz (): 27 s 0,5%

1,57 GHz (): 24 s 0,4%

1,5 GHz (): 1 m 53 s 2,0%

1,27 GHz (): 20 s 0,4%

1,19 GHz (): 18 s 0,3%

1,04 GHz (): 11 s 0,2%

960 MHz (): 9 s 0,2%

883,2 MHz (): 12 s 0,2%

729,6 MHz (): 3 m 32 s 3,8%

652,8 MHz (): 1 m 54 s 2,1%

422,4 MHz (): 1 m 36 s 1,7%

300 MHz (): 5 m 20 s 5,8%

Deep Sleep (): 1 h 14 m 8 s 80,2%

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Which hotplug profile and which governor did u use?

Btw. the problem I saw in ak's thread was related to scaling so nothing we can "use" here :)
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
optimized / zzmoove optimal

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Exactly my setting and no problems yet on cm11s. One thing is for sure this time we can exclude zzmoove as it doesn't hotplug. :)
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
was my first and only random reboot since using boeffla kernel :D so it doesn't mean that it was even kernel related :)

just wanted to let you know..

phone was just idling around for an hour (+-10m) and then i was requested to input my pin again.. didn't even notice that it rebootedvin my pocket :D

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One

---------- Post added at 15:45 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ----------

just had another reboot while using chrome... same config: zzmoove optimal, Optimized hotplug, no oc, uv@-25mv,linaro build... will test, if the sabermod build has the same problem for me, as beta8 linaro worked flawlessly :o

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
But please without uv! ;)
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
cannot live without linaro-smoothness anymore :D

ok i undo uv (no probs in previous kernel versions o.O) and enable kernel logger for the next time :D

testing linaro again.. sm is too stuttery at ui transitions for me...

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] vikrant82:
Had similar reboot on sm build beta 8. Posted in main thread.

Sent from my A0001
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
i'm still on linaro beta9 (cm11s-44S) but haven't got a new reboot after i enabled kernel logger before updating to 44s..maybe it's the update that magically fixed everything, or the next random reboot will follow :D i'll report back if anything weird happens

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One

edit: one small weird thing to mention: very small ui micro-laggs i haven't had before updating to 44s...
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
random reboot, again. nothing changed. kmsg incoming.

Gesendet von meinem 1+ One
[ONE Android Development] Fataldose:
I did flash last one from OP. Not works. I did restore stock boot.img for camera. Do I need flash jgcaap's kernel before flash caf/cam?
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Did you try any kernel before this?..
[ONE Android Development] Fataldose:
Nope I didnt just stock jgcaap
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
I'll test..
[ONE Android Development] Fataldose:
Okay waiting for your results
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Confirmed.. :(
[ONE Android Development] Fataldose:
Thank you. I think 5.1 version of this kernel works but i cant find, ZameZam removes old versions i think.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=457095661767098726

I'm pretty sure this one worked.. Tested it about a month ago..

http://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/de...-kernel-linaro-sabermod-t2910357/post68247441
[ONE Android Development] Fataldose:
Well you are a life saver man thanks. It worked :)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
nope i actually keep a lot of the old ones as stated in OP :

https://www.mediafire.com/#185txa9mcwp5d

and btw i cant say if jgcaaps did change anything regarding the cam in his rom/kernel, it worked back then when i tested

and i think for some good time after my test but i don't use his rom atm so i can't say anything.

[MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION]s can u shed some light did u change anything regarding the backported camera? is there the need to change anything in the kernel?
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Your previous version still works, perhaps something changed in the new one?

Sorry for posting a mirror, I didn't find the older version, but had the copy still on my SD..
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
interesting have to test again. no problem about the mirror mate u helped out thx ;)
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Your mediafire links don't seem functional, I get directed to just the website..
[ONE Android Development] storm119:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]

Not sure if this typo...i just noticed this

I flashed the 5.2-CM13.0-bacon-u700-2016-09-18-202627 but Boeffla-Config + About phone reporting my device used 5.2-COS13.1-bacon-u700..?. But good thing is my phone had no issue since the last 2 days using this kernel and for the record flashing on clean system (RR rom) no other custom kernel before...(screen attached)

Thank you for your great works
[ONE Android Development] thecoolkid:
Hey [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]

New beta was released fixing "Dirty Cow" vulnerability: http://www.boeffla.de/index.php/downloads/current-kernel-versions

Could you make your versions with updated code? :)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
sure i'm on it but had to fix some build related issues. new version soon... ;)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes seems like there is a naming issue. related to a typo maybe yes. will check that i anyway have to do builds for all flavors as lord released new versions for all his active kernels ;)
[ONE Android Development] storm119:
ahhh....okay thx mate

Transmitting via Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] laura almeida:
You are slipping..!! :D :laugh: ????
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.3-beta1-CM13.0-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-5.3-beta1-COS13.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-4.3-beta1-OOS2xx-bacon

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
no girl my script was tripping! :)
[ONE Android Development] storm119:
Flashing....its seems the naming/typo get fixed on this build.

Thank you...
[ONE Android Development] thecoolkid:
Thank you sir :)

Can u tell us which versions we're built with updated TC and which with older versions? Looking mainly at u700 and u621 for cm13 ;)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
ehm if i don't add a changelog the last one applies which means same toolchain used as last time. in this case 20161012 versions were used even

though yah newer ones are available meanwhile. so next time there will be such a changelog again i really had no time to update them for these builds ;)
[ONE Android Development] thecoolkid:
Ok, thanks :good:

PS: Just noticed this info is available in the Boeffla config app, sorry for asking ;)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Nethunter Kernel and Installer Pack!

Hi Guys,

new updated nethunter pack (20161111) as of 11.11.16 is available.

plus a new kernel build with a little fix:

Boeffla-kernel-5.3-beta1-CM13.0-nethunter-V2-bacon

Changelog:

Kernel: switched to more recent and open ath9k htc firmware (fixes possible kernel crash when disconnecting usb device.)

packed with recent installer/app versions from 11.11.16

added realtek rtl8187 module loading helper scripts (located in /data/local/nhscripts)

description HERE

have fun!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.3-beta2-CM13.0-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-5.3-beta2-COS13.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-4.3-beta2-OOS2xx-bacon

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-6.0-beta1-CM14.1-bacon

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] Mecca EL:
I just updated to CM14.1 woohoo!!! Thanks [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
Why don't I see theb14.1 in the OP? Am I that blind?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
nope I did forget, thx :)

Gesendet von meinem ONEPLUS A3003 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
OK, I'll check back for them later. Thanks
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
now added to OP, enjoy! :)
[ONE Android Development] habylab:
Ignore!
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.3-CM13.0-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-5.3-COS13.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-4.3-OOS2xx-bacon

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-6.0-beta2-CM14.1-bacon

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
Thanks for the build, but noticed I didn't see u621
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
now it is, thx again :)
[ONE Android Development] storm119:
I've been waiting for this...thank you ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-6.0-beta3-CM14.1-bacon

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- u494,u541,u621 images build with recent 20161201 versions.

- u700 still build with 20160421 version due to usual issues with newer versions.

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] NiSt3R:
I have Oneplus One with Resurrection remix (Android 7.1) whats is the kernel I need?
[ONE Android Development] storm119:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]

Any plans to support cafcam for CM14.1...?

TIA
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
no actually not, but i even tried and it didn't work the easy way by merging in stuff

(which i did cherry pick back then) so there is need to invest time and work

for re-doing it. opo is obsolete for me (+never actually used caf based roms *g*)

hence i'm out. ;)
[ONE Android Development] suvam69:
Can i use the mm kernels on omni mm?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
don't think so (this knowledge is old i think back then on the Galaxy S3 the ramdisk was the main difference with omnirom - now with anykernel-method that problem would be gone - maybe!) but u can always try and tell us if u did a backup beforehand ;)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.4-CM13.0-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-5.4-COS13.1-bacon

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-6.0-beta4-CM14.1-bacon

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- u494,u541,u621 images build with recent 20161216 versions.

- u700 still build with 20160421 version due to usual issues with newer versions.

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] jdogzilla:
Could you run a poll to see how many people are using which version of the build?

---------- Post added at 08:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 AM ----------

Sorry I meant which version of the tool chain?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
thx [MENTION=3284060]jdogzilla[/MENTION] for reminding me, wanted to do that since long time :)

Hi Guys,

just want to let u know that i installed a permanent poll with which we can find out

which kernel builds we actually prefer. please visit OP and hit your choice.

thx for voting, cheers!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] rolarocka:
I used to use u700 on cm13 and cm14 but on 7.1.1 from tugapower l541 is insane with interactive governor and the battery profile from boeffla app. No underclocking and the battery is the best I ever had. No lags while using the phone obviously because of interactive and tripndroid. GJ zz

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] aojc1992:
Pardon me, newbie here.

Theres so many variants. Which is the most widely used?

Boeffla app does not work for the Uber v6 latest on CM 12.1.

Help please...
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
u can use the recently installed poll to decide which one is used most. beside of that u can try to use all of them by just flashing over the different versions and use it for some time to see what u like most. however I can suggest u541 or u621 versions. but that's only my preference u might like linaro versions more (the ones named with "l494 or l541)

don't be confused about all the variants its all the same kernel just build with different toolchains and flags.

boeffla config not working? well beside of knowing that u use a preeeetty outdated rom we would need to know what exactly "not working" means.
[ONE Android Development] aojc1992:
Hi Sir,

Thanks for the advice, I truly appreciate it.

I'm using unofficial CM 12.1 which is this

http://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-continuing-cm12-1-builds-patches-t3288460

For the kernel I'm using the CM 12.1 U600 kernel.

When I open the latest boeffla config app, it says there's no supported kernel.

Thanks again
[ONE Android Development] aojc1992:
Sorry for the stupidity. There was something wrong with the flashing process.

After reflashing the boeffla app worked. Thanks zz
[ONE Android Development] sid21:
Hello [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION], flashed new rom and installed your build but this time the boefella kernel app says kernel not supported with the app.. App got updated today itself.
[ONE Android Development] storm119:
Sorry no problem here....Boeffla Config Apps 2.4.26 + ZZ 6.0-beta 4 + AiCP roms (20170106) :good:
[ONE Android Development] sid21:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] and [MENTION=5939389]storm119[/MENTION], never mind i forgot that not all roms have Selinuxmode as permissive for the boeflla app to work, changed it through terminal and now it works just fine. Using zephyr rom.
[ONE Android Development] storm119:
hmmm...are you serious about the SELinux...?. Why should boeffla config app need SELinux to set to permissive to get it works...?..AFAIK boeffla config apps can run on which ever SELinux you're on...(see ss attached Permissive vs Enforcing).
[ONE Android Development] sid21:
Just now searched the thread.. Even [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] is aware and he told the same thing that boeflla does give problem and doesnt work with selinux set to enforcing..

Now the problem is through terminal i can do that permanently but after a hard reboot it gets back to enforcing thus giving the app again a problem at startup.

[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] can you please elaborate and let me know if there's any work around?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
ehm well i only can say there are no selinux problems with cm/stock roms atm (for which the kernels are made for) so you literally have to expect troubles when using it on "not meant to work on it - roms" ;)

beside of that i did not change anything significant so it's still a boeffla-kernel with all it's compatibilities and non-compatibilities. anyway ok u actually found already the workaround by disabling selinux, maybe u can make it stick via a init.d script which might get executed before boeffla config app (u could add an boot delay in the app in addition if u need that), just an idea. did u already try to disable selinux in boeffla app?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-6.0-beta5-Lineage14.1-bacon

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- u494,u541,u631 (new, exchanged with u621) images build with recent 20161229 toolchain versions.

- u700 still build with 20160421 version due to usual issues with newer versions.

enjoy!

ZZ