yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta14-CM12.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta9-CM12s-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta9-OOS12

Enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] nick2013:
hey guys is this kernel supported with broken os?

last time when i tried faced bootloop
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
then u got the answer for your question already, no support for such roms ;) and no there will be no support unless lord boeffla includes that. this rom is based on aosp so I think there even has to be a complete dedicated kernel for it. but that's just my 2 bananas :)
[ONE Android Development] Spaulding89:
Sorry for OT but as I read bananas I have to post this:. [emoji23] [emoji23]

Sent from my slimmed Bacon
[ONE Android Development] brisac:
idk for u guys, but since 2-3 last moths, the battery seems to be lower than on 5.0. is that cus 5.1 isn't still in full development or ?
[ONE Android Development] abhibnl:
It's totally because of 5.1.1. I still can get good battery life on Cos12 but not on all the 5.1.1 roms. The ideal drain is terrible even on airplane mode. I'm afraid google fuked up again.

Sent from OnePlus One
[ONE Android Development] smint86:
In my opinion the battery life is quite decent. 4-5 hours SOT with stunning performance and most up-to-date features is more than enough for me.

Besides that, I had a random reboot after a very long time without :). I think it's the first with all 4.1 betas.

Last_kmsg: https://www.dropbox.com/s/keo39qi9z7gz1ul/last_kmsg?dl=0

4.1-beta14-CM12.1

zzmoove gov, optimal profile

i/o sio 2048kb

native default hotplug

boeffla sound activated

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
It is good, but some of us like me used to get 8 plus hours of SOT with that set up but 1467 instead of that high over clocking. Now I have to use exposed, greenify, power nap to get 7 hours of SOT. Back then I could not use it for 8 hours and have 100% battery, but now end up with 96%. To get close to the old SOt, you would have yo keep using the phone because idle itself will drain it. Also a lot of it has to do with the mobile radio battery drain. It's not the devs fault who provide is these amazing kernels.
[ONE Android Development] smint86:
Got another strange happening. Same setup as above, but this time device froze while listening to Spotify. Music stopped and device didn't respond to any actions (power button). Notification LED was still blinking though. I then tried to activate the display with plugging the charger in. Then it rebooted but I think soft reboot. Maybe these logs help anyway.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ice8oo4ncy9lva9/last_kmsg2?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/h4wxsrywk5e249d/boeffla-debug-03.08.2015-12.12.46.txt?dl=0

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk

/edit

Striked out the last_kmsg2, as it is the same as I posted in the previous report. This is because the second one was only a soft reboot, creating no new last_kmsg. But maybe there's something in the debug log this time, doesn't it have the most up-to-date logcat included? If not, maybe you could advice me how to create better logs. Anyway, I hope I could help with this and would be interested in feedback for the two reports.
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
hi smint86,

ok now i had a bit time to checkout the logs. yeah there were indeed the same 2 crashes in "__sys_trace_return" i think when a cpu wants to enter its idle state

there are two things (actually three): if i analysed that right u are using xposed and u are doing light undervolting. can u avoid both? :) as u know uv is always risky

and xposed for 12.x is far away from stable. about the soft reboot ehm if there was one then its anyway not relevant here so we don't need that ;)

the third would be temaseks rom, i think i saw such a crash previously in a thread but don't nail me down i can't remember where and what it was related to. :) but

maybe u can find something if u search for it. beside of that u can try to use another build from here or even official build from lord boeffla and/or maybe change

governor for some amount of time. due to fast scaling and suspend restrictions zzmoove might provoke unstabilities in some setups

(even though i personally never faced one

without UV and on stock or original CM roms

)

hope that helps in any way ;)

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] smint86:
Thanks for the answer, I'll try to investigate further ;). Besides that, I don't use any UV. At least, I didn't set anything concerning UV in Boeffla-Config. UV profile "none".
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
hmm then try to use "no undervolting" "none" is for manual usage maybe u got here some values left. I compared them with my values und they seem to be lower about 25mv ;)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta15-CM12.1-bacon

Enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] sathish804:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] : What is the Linux Version of the Kernels built by you? For Lords kernel I see it as 3.4.107 but for u600 kernel I see it as 3.4.67.

Is there any advantage if the kernel built with higher Linux version?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
hmm very unlikely as lord boeffla removed upstream changes quite some versions ago in all his kernels (as they produce more issues than advantages in terms of functionality and further updating sources)

hence the versions here also have no upstream changes included anymore.

with which version of official boeffla kernel did u see that? sure u were using a recent version?
[ONE Android Development] sathish804:
I saw it in COS12 kernel log posted by other user on the Lords kernel thread.
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
OK must be an older info/Screenshot then ;)
[ONE Android Development] andip71:
That is already quite a while ago when I removed all Linux upstream.

For COS12 kernel it was since Version 3.1-beta1, 08.06.2015.

Why no upstreaming anymore?

http://www.boeffla-kernel.de/index.php/faq

(2nd question)

Andi
[ONE Android Development] NeGriTa79:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] when will be released the new version 4.1 beta 16?
[ONE Android Development] andip71:
Ouch... golden XDA rule - never ask for an ETA !
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

now ;)

mmmmhm!

ok here we go:

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta16-CM12.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta10-CM12s-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta10-OOS12-bacon

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] smint86:
Unfortunately I had another two random reboots. UV profile changed to “no undervolting“, so this can't be it. Still using xposed, so this would obviously the next I have to merge out. Maybe the logs are useful anyway.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/eaxk0nwnv6wzzya/last_kmsg.log?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/vrp668cu37huj2a/last_kmsg2.log?dl=0

First one was after a pretty long uptime, while typing a sms. Second was shortly after booting up again, I think while screen off.

Switched settings a little:

- zzmoove gov, relaxed profile, native hotplug

- i/o sio 2048kb

- no undervolting

- boeffla sound on

- rest stock

/edit:

Using Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta16-CM12.1-bacon-u600
[ONE Android Development] kantjer:
I'm also having reboots when using zzmoove native hotplug. Switching to default fixes it.

Sent from my OnePlus One
[ONE Android Development] andip71:
For sure useful information for ZaneZam.

On top, if you use zram... Disable it. I found out it is causing freezes and reboots, see my main thread.

Will remove zram in the next kernel updates.

Andi
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
I guess I'm pretty lucky. I'm using the battery save preset with no issues on latest Zane U511 and or Lords kernel. I've used both.

Which version are you running?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
hmmm you got no kernel crashes in these logs and yes for the xposed thing, back then when i was still using it i got such reboots too., often out of nothing at suspend.

since uninstalling xposed, no such reboot happend again. it might also be related to one or a combination of used modules and not xposed per se ;)

do u have a las kmsg log or can u provoke that crash again and generate one? i would be interested in having more infos about your problem ;)
[ONE Android Development] kantjer:
I will enable zzmoove hotplug again and post the kmsg log if/when I have a reboot.

FYI I'm not using xposed. Running SlimSaber, used your source code with only the needed ramdisk change and the kernel build with Uber 6.

EDIT: still no reboots :fingers-crossed:
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta17-CM12.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta11-CM12s-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta11-OOS12-bacon

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta18-CM12.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta12-CM12s-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta12-OOS12-bacon

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] MojoManagement:
o3 and fast math for compiler
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
i read about that the music problems still accure yes but never faced them here on opo and could fix them (by just lowering readahead buffer) on my Galaxy S3. it's a combination of many things: used governor (on the S3 not only with zzmoove *g*) used player (and their settings/decoding engine) used readhead buffer and scheduler, how many cores are online at suspend/when playing music, and especially with zzmoove if there is a sleep freq limit active or not (usually it is in all profiles) and so on.. but yes it appeared that increasing min freq helps for sure regardless of the things i mentioned ;) u can also try to disable the freq limit in zzmoove by giving freq_limit_sleep the value 0. but at the end i have to repeat it depends on your useage/system. the fix in beta2 shouldn't change here anything it was related to a rare kernel chrash. btw. i will do some tuning to all zzmoove profiles so stay tuned... ;)

its an compiler optimization flag available since gcc version 4.6:

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.1/gcc/Optimize-Options.html

in short it optimzes the generated kernel image to a maximum. and that's good

for performance and as long as it stays stable its also good for us... for now it seems so... :)
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
On your latest linaro, I can't get WiFi to then on. First time ever having this problem with this phone.
[ONE Android Development] f100cleveland:
What ROM are you using? If cm11 variant, it needs to be one that's newer then Nov 1st due to a WiFi commit that got reverted by cm.
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
Crap I didn't know that. I'm on crDroid. Did it say that in the instructions and o missed it?

---------- Post added at 07:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 AM ----------

Went and read a few pages back. Geez. Lol.
[ONE Android Development] f100cleveland:
Its been randomly mentioned. I'd assume most ROMs should be updated pretty soon, if they haven't all ready.

I can attach beta 7 if you still need it?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
good u found it :)

u can also find it in the obsolete download folder from here https://www.mediafire.com/folder/185txa9mcwp5d/bacon ;)
[ONE Android Development] NeGriTa79:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] That uses settings with 2.0beta8 ...

I tried the zzmoove ...

But how do I set it ... he uses his higher frequency ...

That's why I want to know what settings you use ...
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Atm. I use (the actually pretty old!! *g*) optimal setting as it feels the best on my system. But as I'm testing a lot of stuff it change often. But when I'm not testing I always come back to optimal.

You want to know how you can change tuneables in boeffla config? well u would have to spend some nickels for the Lord by purchasing his donation app and gather pro state with it in the config app ;) after doing that you have a governor profile called "tuneable" in the governor profiles list by choosing this u can set tuneables then ;)
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
what's the main difference between moderate and optimal? 'cause i' m used to moderate since my gs3 days and on my opo i don't feel much ofva difference between these two...
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Yes u had the right feeling moderate is based on optimal and was especially made for a "2 core mode" for the S3. as we have here no hotplugging in the governor any more on that platform it's actually obsolete. I think I will merge these settings in one of my next tuning sessions ;)
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
btw: best shed ever used on any device so far! never been so impressed :)

much smoother and more performant than interactive while still being battery friendlier! amazing work.

and thanks alot for the Ofast linaro build - now even the smallest ui stutters are completely gone!

also great thanks out to [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] for this amazing kernel. loved your kernels on my gs3 and now on my opo i tried every popular kernel out there and have to say: boeffla is the best!

franco and ak both seem to have something weird baked into their kernels that cuts off performance (scrolling laggs, fps drops in games, stuttering animations...) only yours doesn't have those issues :)

only complain:

OC doesn't work for me, even with raised voltages for the oc steps.. 2572 works pretty stable, but everything above make my one sudden reboot.. that problem wasn't exsisting in ak kernel but i don't worry that much as i dislike overclocking anyway.. just wanted to test and give feedback ;)

greetings from germany [emoji4]
[ONE Android Development] vikrant82:
Nice! A Linaro build! You don't need to cook yourself on this device. Great support all around. Glad I got this device. I tend to favor Linaro (at cost of stability), but in this case SM being on 4.8.4 0 I will give SM build a go.

Bootloops with Linaro 4.8 as well ? I build for another device and got bootloops with 4.9 but 4.8 Linaro has generally been rock solid. Solid means just a few modules broken like exFAT etc.

Can we also try O3 ?

Thanks again!
[ONE Android Development] Aavion:
-Ofast is better than -O3 :)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Thx glad u like it [emoji4]

You mean if I got bootloops when trying 4.8? No not entirely as the sm484 builds provided here are showing :) but yes with all 4.9 toolchains and yes also with 4.8 linaro toolchains ;) so this is at the moment the maximal possible combination without much changing the original source from our Lord :)

Yeah might be and we actually have that already in all builds here [MENTION=3282465]vikrant82[/MENTION] [emoji4]
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
Too bad I can't use the latest build. I'm on crDroid and would love to know about this 03 and Ofast and try it.
[ONE Android Development] _Beni_:
Had epic battery drain this night

OnePlus One CM11S with Boeffla-Kernel
[ONE Android Development] merikgvr4:
Tried to search and can't find anything. How to install boeffla config? Thanks in advance.
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
why not? does beta7 or beta7a (needed since CM11 nightly 01.11.14 - dunno what's the newest crDriod version is based on) work?

i started to build with Ofast with this versions

sry can't say much never had such a thing but as always most properly not directly related to kernel ;)

but to be sure try the official builds too to exclude some side effects from the buids here, assuming that u are using

a linaro/sabermod build can't see that in your screenshot ;)

download it from here

http://boeffla.df-kunde.de/bc/

and install this 2.1.52_boeffla-config-v2.apk

done ;)
[ONE Android Development] _Beni_:
Using linaro v8 built with zzzmoove optimal, i tried fiops, maybe this Scheduler has a problem

OnePlus One CM11S with Boeffla-Kernel
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta19-CM12.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-beta13-OOS12-bacon

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta20-CM12.1-bacon

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ksss:
Hi.

One nob here. How can I change zzmove profile in synapse? In old synapse it was quite easy but during my time off from synapse the layout is changed. I can see available profiles, but how to pick one?

Br ks
[ONE Android Development] andip71:
Not at all.

Boeffla-Kernels are not designed to work with Synapse app, and never will.

You need to use the Boeffla-config app that is tailored to allow full control over the kernel + has lots of more benefits.

Find and download it from the official homepage: www.boeffla-kernel.de

Andi
[ONE Android Development] deepu458:
Hi [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION], i have started using this CM12.1 Uber 511 Boeffla Kernel on my OnePlus One with RR Rom from the last half day. I think the time to wake the screen for an incoming call is too high(i guess somewhere between 7-9 seconds), so is there any setting i can tweak so that i can reduce this time. Currently i am using CPU Governor ZZMove and ZZMove Battery Plus.

Sorry if it was a Newbe Question.
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
hi, yes this is a known effect when using zzmoove with almost all zzmoove battery profiles, as they have quite "slow" settings (sampling rate etc.) and many restictions at sleep to save more power. try to use one of the other profiles like optimal and especially "relax" which has 2 cores online all the time and has no restrictive sleep settings. this should fix your delay. beside of that i will release a change in zzmoove which will make things better in general, should be available in upcoming versions of boeffla kernel then. ;)
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
We apprciate all that you do. I have been using the same zzmove profile for months and until recently have I had issues with unlocking to answer calls. Can't wait for an update. Thanks
[ONE Android Development] deepu458:
Thanks [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION], we will wait for your update and hope everything works smother.
[ONE Android Development] kantjer:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] if you have time can you look at the latest Uber 6 TC

Tried it today but it's giving build errors, I guess an other fix is needed.

arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:45:37: warning: result of '57088 << 16' requires 33 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Wshift-overflow=]
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
oh new tools to play with, will take a look ;)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
and about the error try to use the flag "-Wno-shift-overflow" either on complete build in kernel Makefile or with an extra flag in arch/arm/kernel/Makefile ;)

it seems to be a new feature which was added to warn about bit left shifting overflows: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02261.html

to fix that in code and if that is even necessary we would need "some" more advanced knowledge (at least i would need that *g*) so this is just disabling this forbidden warning

to get ur build up, but i have a feeling that its ok doing it like so :)
[ONE Android Development] kantjer:
Thanks. I tried adding "EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Wno-shift-overflow" but it didn't fix the build error.
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
OK that's not so nice and in kernel makefile for the whole build it also doesn't work?
[ONE Android Development] kantjer:
adding "-Wno-shift-overflow" to KERNELFLAGS (line 357) in the kernel Makefile fixed the build :good:

Haven't flashed yet but the build is OK now.

Edit up and running now
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-CM12s-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-CM12.1-bacon

Boeffla-kernel-3.1-OOS12-bacon

Uber ones build with newest toolchain versions

enjoy!

ZZ

PS: new mirror available : http://renderserver.net/?dir=devs/ZaneZam/linaro/ (credits and thx to Render Team!)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-beta2-CM12.1s-bacon

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] gershee:
:beer::beer::beer::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
[ONE Android Development] andip71:
Yes, in fact both naming conventions are possible.

I call it COS12.1, ZaneZam calls it CM12.1s.

But it is the same.

[MENTION=289444]Zane[/MENTION]: Maybe would still make sense if you change that from CM12.1s to COS12.1 as well, to avoid confusion. I changed it to COS12.1 starting with this new kernel.

Andi
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Yes cm12.1s = cos12.1 it's the old naming convention but I consider to rename it in the future to "unconfuse" u but today it's still called so :)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Again almost crashed during posing my friend :)
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
I was wondering the same. I've never flashed the COS12.1 roms before until the latest one just came out. I'm not sure which kernel to use. I think it's the 12.1s kernel correct?
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Yes correct the little "s" makes the difference to the other build.
[ONE Android Development] abhibnl:
Hi zane! Quick question: have you updated the uber toolchain from 511 to 521? Also, which one of the three, 4xx, 511 and 600 is stable toolchain?

I don't know what sorcery CM has done with this COS version but it's insanely smooth and battery efficient.

Sent from OnePlus One
[ONE Android Development] dwaipayanray95:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] A stupid question! But which one of the compiled kernel would provide a better battery life, its okay if the performance is a lil weak! UberTC provides better battery but which one of them? there are like so many of them and idk the differences!

Kindly point me in the right direction as well
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
Yes I did update to recent uber versions. For what I know the 4.9.4 and 5.2.1 are the "stable" ones and the 6.0.0 is still at experimental state. Yeah the new Rom runs very well actually also my impression.

There are (almost *g*) no stubit questions! :)

But honestly i can't answer your (actually even good question *g*) as I never did a comparison. I use to use only u600 on every device here. Sry but u have to find that out by yourself but I think there is not much difference between them. Especially because I'm using the same optimization flags for all three uber builds. One thing I consider to test is reverting from maximum optimization back to stock one (at least partially) . got a report that bat life was good noticeable better than with the stock flags on the S3. It's actually already known that full optimization often doesn't have only benefits. But let's see if that makes any difference here too at the end.
[ONE Android Development] abhibnl:
Thanks for the answer Zane. :)

Also regarding battery life, I always use the 5xx series kernel and they work pretty well for me with no issues at all. Battery life is reasonable considering i'm on 2G/3G 95% of the time. I'm using 1957Mhz as the max frequency from day one and honestly, i have never faced any "performance degradation". :cyclops:
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-beta3-COS2.1-bacon

this time (and in the future) with the new naming convention "COS12.1" ;)

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] suaverc118:
Thanks for fixing that. Appreciate it
[ONE Android Development] brisac:
So are these for cm12.1 or what haha I'm still confused :P
[ONE Android Development] infatality:
Cyanogenmod OS 12.1. Stock official rom for oneplus one.
[ONE Android Development] brisac:
guys, how's your SOT in two days of usage. i get 6h max, but i used to get higher before on 5.0. don't know if that's up to rom or kernel? btw, anyone have a new good kernel config? mind sharing thanks:)
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.2-beta1-CM12.1-bacon

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

just uploaded builds of

Boeffla-kernel-4.2-beta2-CM12.1-bacon

Changelog:

in all builds -> changed back to stock -O2 optimization to fix boot issues after introducing f2fs support

all uber builds -> updated to recent toolchain versions as of 01.09.2015

enjoy!

ZZ
[ONE Android Development] Hilmesh:
hello. downloading