yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 6  General] BhosxTris:
I'm here also at ph.. i already change my battery... Not a stock one but same specs.. my nexus6 works again without any issue except 15% early shutdowns idont know why... But the battery is quite good.. possibly due to changes on the software.
[Nexus 6  General] shann0ns:
Where did you get your replacement battery from?
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Q&A for [SCRIPT] Mallory Engine 'V3' Final - Keep battery life and speed together

Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer. Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :smile:
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ignaciodnb:
__
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kryptonite bob:
May i know how uninstall this script..?
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IvsomEmidio:
Delete /System/etc/init.d files in this folder
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IGorMcLven:
Works fine for me.

Thanks for the script, I have not noticed a big change, but so far it works fine.

Regards.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] QA Bot:
[Q&A] [ROM][XXUFNG4][19Sep]Omega v30 ●►Android 4.4.2 &amp; 4.3 &amp; 4.1.2◄&#

Q&A for [ROM][XXUFNG4][19Sep]Omega v30 ●►Android 4.4.2 & 4.3 & 4.1.2◄●Omega Files◄●►Themes◄●►

Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer. Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :smile:
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kshishar:
Bluetooth problems with v30

Hi,

Are there problems with bluetooth with v30? I upgraded and bluetooth range degraded drastically. Came back to v29 and everything is good.

Please advise.

Thanks,

k****ij
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zion18:
Bluetooth on Omega V30

Was about to flash this ROM but i read the latest reviews which states that it has issues with Bluetooth. Since i'm all day bluetooth user, will wait for a fix on that one before flashing this one. Untill then, Keep up the good work guys. Good Going.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kshishar:
Bluetooth problems with v30

There are bluetooth problems with v30. It has to do with the latest kernel from Samsung where bluetooth stops working if the distance between the bluetooth headset and phone is more than 50cms.

Be on v29 and wait for v31 where this problem will hopefully be fixed.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ToxicSerpentz:
wifi issue on omega v30

I have faced this problem both with omega v29 and v30 on my note 2. If WiFi is on and I restart the phone, WiFi automatically turns on once the phone boots up. The issue I am facing is that when I make a call, I am unable to hear the ringtone through the internal earpiece speaker or the back speaker as well. Further, while the display shows the phone is ringing, the name of the person does not change to green when they pick up the call. I am unable to hear their voice as well although they can hear mine.

On a separate note, I have noticed that my phone loses network and shows 'not registered on network' (happens once in blue moon) despite excellent cell reception. I am unsure if this is related to the previous issue.

I have tried *#7353# each time to check if there is a problem with the speakers itself, but they are fine.

When migrating from v29 to v30, I wiped clean and factory reset the device, but the issue did not go away.

A workaround I have discovered is to switch off WiFi and disconnect the device from charging before restarting the device, thus WiFi does not turn on automatically on boot, and if I wait for 5 to 10 minutes, calls work fine.

I am assuming WiFi is the culprit here but do not have enough information to diagnose what is wrong and how to correct it. I have googled this issue but did not find a solution.

Sorry if this is a bit long winded. Thanks for your time.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jpvanpolanen:
Hello guys,

I came from 4.3 and flashed v40 today. After the installation that went fine, it reboots and then i get stuck on the bootanimation (Omegadroid walking). After shutdown en restart, i can't get into recovery or download mode. Every time it boot straight into boot animation.

Any pointers?

---------------
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mubeenshahid:
I have flashed v30 and i have experienced 3 random boots.What can be the problem
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelda0079:
There is a issue in this ROM.

When I choose Full wipe options, the device will not be able to reboot normally.

I must choose No Full wipe.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kutch2001:
Greetings,

Great ROM, I truly enjoy it. Downloaded V31 couple days ago (direct using link) and it works great with everything installed, with exception of one item, mobile cell data. I can connect to wifi after applying that boot menu patch file with Odin. Am on the AT&T Network and have a SIM card and data doesn't function.

Switched from Cyagenomod to this one on my Note 2 (N7100 version) directly. I live in the US so this could be my issue? Cyagenomod everything worked great, with exception of camera which was funky.

Did full wipe, cleaned Delvik, and all that other stuff prior to installing this ROM.

Looking in About Device section:

Model Number: GT-N7100

Android Version: 4.4.2

Baseband version: N7100XXUFNG1

Kernel version: 3.0.31 -3569041 ... DEC 12 20:16:40 KST 2014 (abbreviated for my sanity)

Build number: Omega v31 - XXUFNL1

Under status shows following info:

Mobile network type: HSDPA

Mobile Network State: disconnected
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kutch2001:
First a little rant.. Guess this is the "throw away" thread for all those "new" users who don't know sunny side from dark side...... Was impressed with this ROM but unsure if will go back due to lack of answering my noob question.

On to fixing this.

Since still had no response did a quick search on the internet and came across this thread on xda developers:

That thread guided me to the APN settings for my phone. I'm on straight talk, in the US, and they use custom settings. Once got into this area immediately recognized what needed to do and that is to choose the specific Straight Talk APN settings (instead of defaulted AT&T LTE setting). I didn't really remember setting this up. Hope my memory loss helps other people facing same problem.

For now switched to the Team UB rom. It's nice enough for now, maybe it'll grow into me.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thyranet:
I thing omega rom it's stable rom
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] edisp:
can i used this rom for my device..? now i am using custom rom phantom v13 , and spec my note 2 :

- ANDROID VERSION :

4.4.2

- BASEBAND VERSION :

N7100DXUFNI1

- Kernel : Agni kernel pure stock 3.0.101
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nic88:
ANT+ support

hello guys is there a way to enable ant+ property on this rom? Thanks in advance...
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] specdf:
Screen Mirroring Hardware Problem v31

Hi Folks!

Omega Rom V31 as always... the best! My only.. big problem is that i am always getting the "hardware problem" when i tried to conect to the the tv via screen mirroring. I really need it working... can anyone help me with that or knows anyone a fix/solution?

Thank you all!
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] comena:
CWM touch recovery v 6.0.4.3 cant mount sd

Dear friends, sorry for my interference, im having CWM recovery v 6.0.4.3 on GT N7100, i used to flash omega ROM 4.3, with note 3 mod everything went well until one day i got stuck on Samsung log and the phone did want restart, i decided to go on CWM recovery, stunned with this message

E: Can't mount /cache/recovery/command

E: Can't mount /cache/recovery/log

E: Can't open /cache/recovery/log

E: Can't mount /cache/recovery/last_log

E: Can't open /cache/recovery/last_log

But still I can go on download mode, i flashed official rom from summobile 4.2.2 with odin3 v 3.09 , but once i gone to stock recovery it takes me to last CWM touch recovery v 6.0.4.3 where i can not mount sd or formate anything, i than tried twrp i tried twrp 2.8.0.4, same thing stuck with CWM recovery....

how can please resolve this problem, ? any help please
[XDA Assist] fastgeared:
It seems that no one is able to help regarding the solution for rooting the phone. Though its a relatively new model , but i expected someone would atleast come up with the guide for rooting the karbonn titanium octane.

Anyway, a bit confusing part with the camera is that, at the back of the phone it says "13 mp camera" , while in the camera settings , the maximum Picture size is 6mp :confused:
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vehvariya:
Now that we have the nexus devices announced and source code to be revealed in the coming weeks. Is anyone planning to build a ROM for our tab2 community?
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dablakmark8:
I second that:D
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] PanchoPlanet:
We ain't done with our Kitkat yet.

Too fast and you get a stomach ache.

Pp.
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iosasu:
It will be interesting if they could the Lollipop on the Tab 2
[Nexus 6  General] raazman:
https://plus.google.com/photos/+DuanDao/albums/6070583356055960369
[Nexus 6  General] bartolo5:
They don't look very impressive to say the least... Pictures were taken in Irvine CA. I wonder who has access to a Nexus 6 this early down there? :confused:
[Nexus 6  General] msal:
How do we know these pictures were taken with a Nexus 6?

As far as the pictures go, they are very hit or miss. There are a few decent ones, but the majority of them don't look very good. :eek:
[Nexus 6  General] PhantomGamers:
I guess it could be faked but:

In photo details.

This is quite disappointing, Nexus cameras aren't known to be amazing but for $649 I'd surely expect more than this.
[Nexus 6  General] raazman:
Click on the posters image. He had the nexus 5 test device.
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
The colors look oversaturated, which I guess is typical for cell phones (except a handful of the older flagship Nokia phone cameras).

Anyway, preproduction devices often do not have fully calibrated cameras, so I wouldn't put too much stock in how these images look. This person is also clearly not a professional photographer. I don't think any meaningful judgments can be made until reviews come out from some of the better sites for photography in phones.
[Nexus 6  General] ericerk:
The good ones were sadly made w/ an iPhone.

Underwhelmed to say the least.

650+ Should buy a high end everything, especially camera. They could of at least out sourced the camera for that price.
[Nexus 6  General] msal:
How can you tell it's from an iPhone?
[Nexus 6  General] ericerk:
The Photo details button. It's on the right of the picture.
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
I don't understand what you're talking about. Motorola doesn't make camera sensors. Neither does Google. Just about every phone manufacturer outsources the camera and there are only a handful of companies that actually make camera sensors for phones. The Nexus 6 has a Sony IMX214 Exmor RS sensor. The Sony sensors are in a lot of phones these days. The Sony sensors aren't bad. And it is absolutely absurd to make any conclusions about the Nexus 6 camera based on a couple random photos, from a bad photographer, on a pre-production device.

That aside, what do people expect anyway? The Nexus 6 has a 1/3 sensor like basically every other phone out there these days (including the iPhone) and that just makes for a mediocre camera. They are all more or less equally mediocre and there's no reason to expect anything different from the Nexus 6. It's not about megapixels, its about the actual physical size of the sensor. Phones have not changed from 1/3 sensors for a long time (because they can't do it and remain thin). Only the OIS is an interesting feature on the Nexus 6.

If you want a good camera, get a Nokia 1020 or Nokia 808 and just deal with the operating systems on those phones. They have huge sensors that are far superior to anything and everything else. Even five year old Nokia cameras, like in the N86, have much larger sensors than every phone out there. The only single exception is the Galaxy S5, which has a 1/2.5 sensor like the five year old N86, but the S5 is still nowhere remotely close to the 1020 or 808.

Those are your real choices. Everyone else has just thrown their hands in the air and excepted "good enough" cameras, because they'd rather make the phones super thin, than put good sensors in them. Superficial numbers and specs change, but phone cameras really are not progressing anymore. (Even Nokia has dropped the ball, now that Damian Dinning, the person behind the great cameras at Nokia like the 808, has left the company and the cell phone business.)
[Nexus 6  General] ericerk:
What you're saying is fair, but It's not just random bias. I haven't seen a wonderful camera on a Moto phone since.... EVER.

I'm not getting it for the camera, I had the M8... I just want something that has a good camera. Something that doesn't shoot duds. I don't want a potato cam.
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
I know a lot of people think the Moto cameras recently have been mediocre, but I really think, for the reasons I said, it's making a big deal out of relatively small differences. All of these phones have mediocre cameras with various limitations. The difference between good mediocre and medium mediocre is not that meaningful to me.

Like I said, if you want the best of the middle of the road cameras, get a Galaxy S5. If you want a truly great camera in a phone, get a Nokia 1020 or Nokia 808. Everything else is splitting hairs.

That said, I think the Nexus 6 (and Moto X) will be fine. As noted, it has a 1/3 Sony Exmor sensor, the likes of which can be found in perfectly respectable phones like the iPhone 4 and 5 and the Galaxy S4. It's not one of the newer generation Exmor RS sensors, but the advantages of those sensors has been overplayed. They're mostly still 1/3 sensors and so, whatever. A 1/3 sensor is never going to make for a great camera. But it is the status quo these days so it's not going to be subpar either (like for example the Nexus 4 that has a tiny 1/4 sensor).
[Nexus 6  General] ericerk:
If you'd like to chip in on the 700+ I have to put into this phone, I feel the right to have my own opinion on it.

I like a decent cam in the device.

I want to to be up to my standards, now yours. We don't know if this is the final hw version of the camera. We'll see that in a few weeks.

I want a nexus, w/ a non moto esque camera. The N5 was good enough. Except able.

For example the moto X took decent pictures... but they were really bad, and grainy and had weird artifacts. There was grain, and distortion in high light.

The moto x 2014 is crap in low light, the light ring isn't really conducive to light up anything.

The nexus 6 has the same set up, which makes me nervous. The camera is in theory the same as well.

All I'm saying is their track record is bad. Googles been talking about making better cameras on their flag ship devices for ages. So we're hoping w/ this one it's a home run

They weren't restricted in price in this variation. They put in very high end spec, and components. If the camera isn't just as good as the Galaxy S4 I will be upset. Very upset.

The S4 had a wonderful camera.

That's my bench mark.
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
You have the right to have your opinion but that doesn't make it a thoughtful opinion.

If you think the Nexus 5 was good enough, with a Sony Exmor IMX179 1/3.2 sensor, than it makes zero sense to think that the Nexus 6 with a newer technically better Sony Exmor IMX214 and slightly larger 1/3.06 sensor is worse, and it makes even less sense to think that the 2nd Gen Moto X with a newer generation Sony Exmor RS IMX135 and also slightly larger 1/3.06 sensor is worse.

People make all these subjective judgements about the cameras in the phones and don't realize that they all have more or less the same sensor in them from Sony.

What's more you based your initial judgement about the Nexus 6 camera on a couple random poorly taken snapshots linked to in the OP, from a pre-prodcution Nexus 6 that may not have even had the same sensor in it as the final production unit.

So yes you have a right to your opinion. But it is a very poorly reasoned, jumping to unfounded conclusions opinion, based on a misunderstanding of the actual sensors in these phones. Wait for a good site, like Dpreview to test the camera in the Nexus 6 or Moto X and then maybe you will have a basis for coming to some sort of conclusion.

But in the end, with the 1/3 sensors, these phones are still going to all be in the same ballpark. People can make a big deal out of minor distinctions, if they want to, but it's silly and not meaningful in real world situations. The reason to spend a lot of money on a phone like this is not for the camera.
[Nexus 6  General] ericerk:
My opinion is based off of the moto x 2014. Nothing concrete has been released about the camera internals that I've seen.

I'm buying this phone even if it doesn't have a camera (That's a lie)
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
As I note above more than once, the Nexus 6 has the Sony Exmor IMX214 sensor. That information is readily available online. See: http://www.devicespecifications.com/en/model/617b3011. This is the same sensor as in the OnePlus One, a phone for which the camera has been praised a lot and the OnePlus One doesn't even have OIS.

That being said, the 2nd Gen Moto X, as I said, has a Sony Exmor RS IMX135. This is the same sensor as in the Galaxy S4, making it completely silly that you're so down on the 2nd Gen Moto X, but hold up the Galaxy S4 as your minimun standard that a phone camera has to meet. The IMX135 can also be found in the LG G3, the LG G2, the Note 3, amongst many other phones, further putting the lie to the idea that there are big differences between the cameras in these phones.
[Nexus 6  General] DirgeExtinction:
Doesn't camera software also play a role in how well a photo is taken?
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
To some degree yes. But it's relevance is pretty minor. Sometimes there are problems when a phone first comes out that are later corrected in software updates(colors being off one way or another). A lot of phones favor oversaturated colors, instead of more realistic colors, which is something determined by how the image is processed by the phone after it is captured. Some phones apply more sharpening effects, which at first glance make an image look, well, sharper, but actually eliminate some detail in the image (though you will only notice if you zoom all the way in to the pixel level--which is not what most people are doing, most people are downsizing images to send to people and therefore eliminating most of quality of the image to begin with). But again, this is all fiddling around the edges to compensate for what are essentially very small sensors that are simply physically limited in what they can do.

Also, these software effects are pretty much all things that can be changed in post-processing on a computer, so they are not ultimate limitations to the images that can be produced with a particular phone. But the sensor is such a limitation, there is no getting beyond what it is or is not possible with a paritcular sensor.
[Nexus 6  General] PewPewK:
Looks like we're gonna get another mediocre camera in a Nexus device, nothing abnormal here. I don't mind too much, I rarely, if ever, use my phone as a camera. If I anticipate taking photos, I'll bring a real, decent camera with me. Otherwise the mediocre shots from the Nexus'll be just fine.

Was kind of hoping that they'd get the camera right this time, though. I would have been nice, especially for others who rely on it more, but it seems they put their money elsewhere.
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
Did you look at my posts above? The Nexus 6 has the same Sony camera sensor as the OnePlus One, which a lot of people have praised for it's photos. Plus it has OIS. Yes the Nexus 5 and especially the Nexus 4 had subpar cameras, by today's standards. But the Nexus 6 is pretty much on a par with all other flagships out there. It should be a step up (on a par with the LG G3, iPhone, Galaxy S4, etc.).

That being said, as I've argued above, all of the latest flagship phones these days have mediocre cameras, because of their 1/3 sensors, so in that sense the Nexus 6 will be no different. The only truly good flagship phone camera is the Galaxy S5, which has a larger 1/2.5 sensor. And the only phones with what could be called next generation, big step forward cameras, are the Nokia 1020 and the Nokia 808, with huge 1/1.5 and 1/1.2 sensors (respectively), mechanicals shutters, and other advances way beyond anything else.

But I think there's no reason to be down on the Nexus 6 for it's camera. It's keeping up with the pack.
[Nexus 6  General] jineshpatel30:
1. Exactly :)

2. I don't knw why nexus 6 doesn't perform good in low light...with 2 flashes it should perform very well may be it's due to ring on flash tjat shatter it :(

3. Note 4 night pics are really nice but in light it doesn't capture colors very well , they become over saturated or cool , and iphone 6+ crops image while recording video so i don't like it.. it perform most things very well but all of them depends on software render so sometimes image lose it's original charm ;)

(For mpre detail review you guys should check " some gadget guy" YouTube channel he gives gr8 camera review...i'm waiting for his nexus 6 camera review)
[Nexus 6  General] cb474:
I guess I would say the same thing to you. You look at the images posted here and seem to see the opposite of what they actually show. You even confused the white balance being off on the Note 4, for over-saturated colors.

As far as the low light Note 4 image goes that I posted, I still don't see your point. Is it perfect in a very difficult lighting situation? No. Does it just hands down crush the Nexus 6 which produces unusable crap in the same situation? Yes. There's no other releveant point to make, insofar as comparing the low light capacity of the Nexus 6 to the Note 4 goes. And my only point, anyway, was just to demonstrate the advantages of having a sensor larger than the mediocre 1/3 sensors that are in just about every phone (the only exceptions are the S5, Note 4, the unfortunately not so great Z2 and Z3, and the stellar Nokia 808 and 1020).

Anyway, I leave it to others to look at the images and judge for themselves. I peronsally think that those who cannot see that the Nexus 6 produces classically over-saturated images are wrong. People like the overdone colors, but that doesn't make it accurate or a good camera.

I think the Nexus 6 camera seems to be fine and way better than previous Nexus phones. But people who are getting all excited and declaring it one of the best cameras out there, at least in daylight, are, well, getting a little over-excited. I suppose I shouldn't expect anything else in the Nexus 6 part of the forum. And we should be happy that the Nexus 6 is more or less in the ballpark of current flagships. But it really is not the best at anything. If the camera is your number one concern, you're better off with a Galaxy S5 or maybe iPhone 6 Plus or Nokia 1520. And if you really want a great camera, then there's only the Nokia 1020 or Nokia 808, but those are older phones and one with a defunct operating system.
[Nexus 6  General] eep2378:
I'm optimistic about the N6 camera after reading through a lot of this material. Its disappointing that google didn't calibrate the screen as well as it could have, but same thing happened with the N5. Based on the amount of development presence Nexus devices get, I'm sure it can/will be corrected.
[Nexus 6  General] gtg465x:
At least with the N5 they tried to calibrate the screen properly, even if it wasn't perfect. With the N6, it doesn't even look like they tried.