yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Hi all,

next maintenance update for CM14.1 Boeffla Kernel:

Version 6.0-beta2

30.11.2016

Update: Updated with latest official CM kernel commits as of 30.11.16, 3pm CET

Change: Update with latest anykernel commits (credits to Osm0sis)

Change: Internal cleanup and improvements

Enjoy

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] 69gm:
I am having problems with the config app. I can't install it. I keep getting some parsing error. What am I doing wrong?
[ONE Original Android Development] Fenvarien:
Thanks for your hard work and your ongoing support for the OnePlus One! :good: :)
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
just wanted to ask if BOEFFLA recommend using F2FS with his KERNEL...

obviously more and more people use it but mostly the comments are that there is no segnificant change in speed.

i wonder if there is a change at all (in the rom flashing process, installing apps, battery time)?

thanks.
[ONE Original Android Development] infatality:
You can try to use as it's not totally related to kernel.. Speed wise.. You won't actually see or feel the difference between ext 4 or f2fs.
[ONE Original Android Development] firenxe:
Give the "package installer" app storage permissions. It should work afterwards.
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
if speed wise i won't see any difference, why people are using it?

are you sure it is not kernel related what so ever?
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
It is most likely a permission issue.

Put the apk to /data, install from there and then remove again.

Or do a fresh install to fix storage permissions...

You are welcome. I cannot see my ling-term baby dying at all ☺️

Argh... Even stated in the op.

I really do hate f2fs, as much as I hate xposed.

I will never recommend to use it.

It is hyped, that's it.

Giving better benchmark figures that mean nothing in real life.

And I read too often people using f2fs having all sort of issues up to complete data loss.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
nice to hear that i am not the only one...

what about android 7.1 and your new beta 6 version...

any changes in performace/battery life VS previous versions?

(looking for a reason to make full wipe :) )

thanks!
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Kernel is in maintenance mode, ie I only implement cm changes.

Don't think there is a big difference in battery life / performance...

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
thanks!
[ONE Original Android Development] LTMendarynas7:
Hello. Couple of questions about this (Im old in the custom rom stuff, but never had used custom kernel.)

1.Does it work with Tuga N?

2. If this kernel gives better battery life then stock kernel?
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
1. this kernel gives support for CM only roms.. it might work, but no support here.

2. this kernel gives many features... many gives more battery life.
[ONE Original Android Development] 69gm:
Giving package installer app storage permission did the trick! Thanks!!!
[ONE Original Android Development] LTMendarynas7:
Well Tuga is based on CM so it have to work. Any suggestions how to tweek kernel? I don't play games only using apps like 9gag, facebook, xda etc. I just need good standby and bit better SOT then stock kernels
[ONE Original Android Development] shrey7:
Does this kernel work with Resurrection Remix 7.1 ROM? Plz help.. Thanks.
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
there are battery saving profiles for this kernel.

use the "Boeffla-Config" app to use them.

BTW, for FACEBOOK alternative i would use "slim social".

it should work.
[ONE Original Android Development] shrey7:
Thanks buddy.. Sorry to ask but can u point a link?

Can I flash CM 14.1?
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
link to slim social? in the google play store.

cm 14.1 is not supported in the

KERNEL

thread but in the CM14.1

ROM

thread.
[ONE Original Android Development] shrey7:
I just flashed it.. Works fine. Not much improvement.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Can you explain what you mean by "not much improvement"?

And also what your expectation was? (seems you have wrong expectations when you expect miracles)

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] LTMendarynas7:
Just flashed Boeffla kernel on TugaPower N8. Everything seems to work. Made some tweeks (added screenshots) maybe some suggestions for tweeks from more experienced players in tweeking stuff. My goal is to get better battery (standby and SOT) with not losing or at least with very small loss of performance.
[ONE Original Android Development] shrey7:
My expectations was obviously better battery life, that's all but not miracles like u assume..

Miracles on phone? really :p lol..
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Read q1 here, and follow the link at the end of q1:

http://www.boeffla.de/index.php/support/faq

Kernel influence on battery life is not big.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] kryshnakishore:
Does slow charging effect the battery life? I reduced to 1000ma. Will there be any difference if I slow charge or charge under default settings?

P. S yes it does change battery calibration so I will never touch stock charging settings.
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
slow charging usualy produce less heat. better for you battery.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Slower charging might make your battery living longer even. So it is a good thing if you have enough time.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] cs_official:
What's the best profile for fast charging and ultra slow discharge settings????
[ONE Original Android Development] j1po:
you can select preset in boeffla config app menu

I use batt friendly predet for daily use, quite smooth and battery friendly
[ONE Original Android Development] cs_official:
And do we have to flash the kernel zip everytime we flash a new update zip of the same ROM?
[ONE Original Android Development] j1po:
yes, flash rom will replace boeffla kernel with ROM kernel
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
That is why (when you have the donation version of Boeffla-Config), you can do the whole flash in one automated batch.

I do an update of the nightly + installing Boeffla afterwards + doing a full nandroid backup before every day with a few clicks.

So it is not really in issue anymore, due to the automation.

But yes, the answer was right - every rom flash usually replaces a custom kernel by the stock kernel again. This is intended as such.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] storm119:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]

Please take a looks at this commits on current CM14.1 (7.1.1) its break the tethering. Upstream patches Fixed this issue and the fixes are within the kernel level...

Commits

Review/Patch

TIA
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
These are rom commits, no kernel commits?

So nothing for me, I am afraid :)

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Hi all,

new CM14 kernel update:

Version 6.0-beta3

08.12.2016

Update: Updated with latest official CM kernel commits as of 08.12.16, 4pm CET

Change: Update with latest anykernel commits (credits to Osm0sis)

Enjoy

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] storm119:
hmmm...i did ask my rom dev regardless this issue and he replied to me...

he also provided the boot.img to flash which included the fixed...but i'm afraid if i were to flash boeffla kernel it will break the patch..???
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
The commit you pointed me to is no kernel commit.

Whatever the rom dev told you about it... but this commit (https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_system_netd/commit/9232260ad1acb2915906f2814488a26bacaf4606) is not going into kernel code.

If your rom dev says differently, write me his name and I will get in touch with him to educate.

You can try if flashing Boeffla breaks it. No idea.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] storm119:
ahhh...okay i will try to flash the latest boeffla kernel and see how it goes...???

btw...thank you for your prompt replied...
[ONE Original Android Development] siddardha21:
Thank you so much for constantly keeping up with the CM kernel changes!! ?
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
No problem. You are both welcome.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Arte:
Hey guys I've a question, I'm trying to flash this kernel on the lastest cm14.1 official nightly but I keep getting a zip verification error in twrp even if md5 test is successful with both beta 2 and 3
[ONE Original Android Development] mp3deviant721:
I usually just disable the md5 check in recovery. Just use an app to verify the md5 before you flash.
[ONE Original Android Development] LTBooster:
How'd it go? Did the latest Boeffla kernel fix tethering?
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
I am not signing zips anymore, as some recoveries are too stupid to handle signed zips.

Sad, but true. You have to disable that.

Why should it? I have not put any fixes in.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] storm119:
Like andi aka lord boeffla said to me...the commits i mentioned before got nothing to do with the kernel side...meaning the commits should merge onto roms side. The good news is most roms i tested this 2-3 days had this commits/patch merged (CM tree sources). So no worries use CM or CM based roms after 10-11th onward and you should be fine... ;)

Ps: correct me if i am wrong...:D

HTH
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Hi all,

security updates for the EOL kernels for CM13 and COS13.1.

Same change log for both:

Version

5.4 stable -- final

14.12.2016

Fix: Security vulnerability CVE-2015-8966 fixed

Fix: Security vulnerability CVE-2016-8655 fixed

Enjoy

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] rHn7113:
I don't think is there any difference between stock and custom kernels!!!M I r8?
[ONE Original Android Development] bdwilk:
No. You are wrong. Read more please.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
????

I do not understand your question.

Why should we create custom kernels when they are same as stock?
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Let's keep it simple guys.

When he asks a proper, serious question - we answer.

When not - we ignore.

This is how it should be handled.

And now back on topic.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] SynisterWolf:
Thread cleaned,

Out of the respect for Developer and the community the OT needs to stop. Disrespecting developers will not get you anywhere but a one way ticket out of here. If you want to contribute to the development of the kernel then please post logs, commits, ect. but if you want to come in here and say "there is no difference between this kernel and stock why make it?" then leave those post out of here.

Thanks

Wolf
[ONE Original Android Development] KenjiHannya:
Look this

https://plus.google.com/+JPKenji/posts/Y4f36ASPM37
[ONE Original Android Development] Gawd:
Not being disrespectful at all, but the first 10% are mostly inaccurate.

Have a look here : http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=9777867#post9777867
[ONE Original Android Development] shail00:
Is this kernel compatible with official 14.1 nighties??
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Yes, and only with official ones.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] shail00:
Thanks man. But am not able to find stable download link on your website.
[ONE Original Android Development] shail00:
Installed the beta version...thats good...do you have profiles to share as well??
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
There is not yet an officially labelled stable version.

There is a dedicated profile sharing thread here on xda. Just do a quick search.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] KenjiHannya:
Tested with stock kernel and Boeffla

https://plus.google.com/+JPKenji/posts/Y4f36ASPM37
[ONE Original Android Development] Fatsodonkey:
Does this still work with the latest cos?
[ONE Original Android Development] shail00:
Actually i did find the thread for the profiles but i believe none of them have provided any feedback on the implementation on cm14.1
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
All CM13 profiles also work on CM14.1. There is actually not much difference in the kernel code, thats why.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] shail00:
Thanks and is there an way to uninstall the kernel??
[ONE Original Android Development] Pablo.x:
Reflash the ROM
[ONE Original Android Development] shail00:
If i update to the new cm nighlty then it would reset the settings??
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
If you update to latest CM nightly without flashing Boeffla later, you have anyways CM stock kernel.

Otherwise, Boeffla settings will survive when you flash Boeffla later again.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Pezmet:
It seems that the next nightly has a bunch of kernel commits.

Just a heads up.

Have a nice day. And thanks for your work!
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
CM14.1 kernel update:

Version 6.0-beta4

19.12.2016

Update: Updated with latest official CM kernel commits as of 19.12.16, 15:00 CET

Fix: Rare CPU scaling issues are fixed

Enjoy

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Pezmet:
Wow that was fast! Thanks
[ONE Original Android Development] suvam69:
Not only CM Nightlies but I successfully flashed Boeffla Kernel over Tuga and LegendRom :)
[ONE Original Android Development] DON2003:
some questions from a flashing noobie,

am planning to go Nougat via either Resurrection Remix Nougat or official CM14.1 nightly, can't decide between the 2, can anyone here recommend?

battery life is most important for me, will flashing Boeffla kernel helps improve battery life? just flash or need to configure or tweak? no knowledge yet on kernel tweaking,

thanks in advance for all helps
[ONE Original Android Development] bdwilk:
Use AICP ROM and flash Boeffla. Yes you'll need to tweak but there's plenty of people who will help you.
[ONE Original Android Development] j1po:
I use RR-N and boeffla kernel with preset : battery friendly

battery life increase than stock kernel or stock setting and I feel no lag of performance with my current application
[ONE Original Android Development] DON2003:
a big difference on RR-N stock kernel and boeffla kernel? what I means is difference in battery life
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
When will people understand a custom kernel cannot make miracles and battery life will not be significantly different?

http://elementalx.org/the-truth-about-kernels-and-battery-life

I have only one tip for you all, based on many years experience:

Just USE your phone instead of trying to squeeze another 1 or 2% battery life out of it. It is not worth the efforts as you cannot control that a lot (apart from uninstalling stupid apps that produce lots of background traffic and cpu cycles).

So to answer your question: It is expected to be very minor.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Sadeed:
How do i uninstall the Kernel?

Any Flashable zips

P.S I know i can flash the rom to get to the stock kernel.
[ONE Original Android Development] gyakusetsu1215:
Your option aside from dirty flashing the ROM would be extracting the boot.img from the ROM zip and flashing it via TWRP.
[ONE Original Android Development] nads555:
Sorry admin my fault didn't check if for Q&A thread.... Anyhow posted in the respective thread.... U can delete this post

Transmitted from bacon
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Dirty flash the rom. This is faster and safer than anything else.

Flashing boot.img only CAN work, but is not guaranteed as this does not copy the modules as well which are under /system/lib/modules.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
Actually, when usin boeffla kernel, i can undervoltage the cpu witch makes my phone last longer and cooler. Big difference!

Thanks Andy
[ONE Original Android Development] sabrefresco:
010111000101011010101011010000101011

Most likely placebo. I used to undervolt (appropriately matching the binning on my SOC), underclock, use custom hotplugging and use battery saving governors aggressively when bacon had updated AK kernels. They made 1-2% improvements in all honesty. The only thing hardware wise that made a difference was switching off cores for good, and that made a difference when at least two or more cores were completely powered off with no touchboost (IIRC). That too, was a mere 10% improvement if not less.

Most phone these days, including the bacon are efficient enough hardware to begin with that there is little to no room for improvement without detrimental decreases in performance. The only workaround would be what is running on it, the software. Try running a ROM without gapps. What you can do is weed out wakelocks, but again that comes at a cost.

Just my two CPU cycles.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Well said.

Undervolting is a left-over of previous days, nothing we still need.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
I strongly disagree! Even in my laptop i use undervoltage and I'm getting 15% cooler temperatures and more battery life!
[ONE Original Android Development] Gawd:
And instability

---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:40 PM ----------

And random freezes
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
Yes, that's why we need to experiment.
[ONE Original Android Development] :
Merry Christmas to you
[ONE Original Android Development] Digo69:
Hello Lord :cool:

I ever use your kernel since my GS3, now I use it with my OnePlus one and Resurrection 5.8.0 (7.1.1).

No problem exept instability when use zzmoove with optimal profile (standard it's ok and very smooth).

But I have a problem :

The audio Hi-Res don't work with PowerAmp alfa v3 704.

It work on Android 6.0.1 no problem.

Can you do something?

Thanks

Sorry if my English is bad :)
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Well, this is a useless debate.

You have your opinion, I have mine.

And I consider undervolting as not required anymore. That is why I also do not allow it anymore on my kernels for newer devices.

Guess, I have very less support work since then. Best decision ever :)

Well, I would have only one quick thing to say (especially as I am not using audio Hi-Res ever myself, so I have no experience with it):

Does it work with stock kernel of RR rom?

If yes, then maybe something is tweaked there. If not, you are out of luck as I am not trying to fix errors on that old devices for things I do not use. But if so, you could maybe trust LineageOS would one day pick it up and fix it.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
No my opinion, but a fact. I am an electrical engineer and i am talking from my experience. Yess undervoltage makes your device less stable...
[ONE Original Android Development] :
your fact is incomplete!
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Ok, we are on par: I am electrical engineer too :)

But theory and reality are not the same. I do not know how old you are, but I am an old chap, I learned that over the centuries.

So I talk about experience, not school theory.

Can we just end this debate now, we will never align on the same opinion.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Fatsodonkey:
Will you support Lineage OS when it hits?

For the undervolting i can vouch for lower temps that will stress your components less. For instability it is the users fault when someone undervolts. Easy way to make these people not report problems is to have disclaimer.

When i used OPX stock it was practically unusable, but with uv i got enough juice for day and had way lower temps. Same goes to any device. This is a known fact for years to anyone who has done overclocking/underclocking/overvolting/undervolting.

There is nothing to debate. :)

Battery life increase depends a lot from device to device. Some get good some bad. In smartphones display is still the one that consumes most of the battery life.

My laptop had a 11c lower temps when undervolted and it is prime95 stable. :) If that is not a useful feature i don't know what is?

With smartphones there is a lot of heat sources so the more some of those can be decreased the better.

I have years of experience about it and of course with a user that is not good with oc/uc/ov/uv should not do it, because they will most propably just suffer instabilities. More advanced users have nothing to worry about and can take the benefits from it.

That is why i have Android and not Iphone, because i have chance to improve my device and it is not only in the hands of the manufacturer.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Yes, I will support LineageOS as it is nothing else but continuing CM as is.

And about the undervolting - yes, there is nothing to debate. You guys have your opinion. I have mine - which is contrary.

And I decide what I do based on my opinion. Game over :)

BTW I refuse support for people doing undervolting, overclocking, using xposed etc. for years already. This all is in the OP for long time + in the support conditions on www.boeffla.de, which are the only valid conditions anyways.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
The difference between the two of the profiles (with/without undervoltage) is about 10%. So maybe this is not relevant for you.

But some app are working (with no need) on max mhz cpu frequency and if we cap the cpu frequency we can save more.

Anyways, i surely want stability over battery.

Lets wait for the new battery technology... ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] rHn7113:
How to flash this ROM with CM 13 Stock?
[ONE Original Android Development] bdwilk:
I think you have the wrong thread son.
[ONE Original Android Development] Nichie:
Ignore the troll
[ONE Original Android Development] TareqA:
Hey im new to kernels... If i flash and forget will i get better battery life? Or do i need to modify something?
[ONE Original Android Development] se7enlyn:
Depends. Like the lord said, use the phone as it is. By tweaking a bit, you will most likely get a slightly better battery than the stock kernel. For me, it's a bit better than stock, like 30 mins to an hour extra.
[ONE Original Android Development] bdwilk:
I've read all the latest posts by Lord Boeffla and I'm sure he knows way more than I do but I've tested my setup many times with and without this kernel and my tweaks. (I won't give numbers because that's only relevant to my personal usage) I will say that with only minor tweaks I've doubled my standby and SOT over stock and it's definitely not placebo. Stability has never been an issue and I couldn't be happier with it.
[ONE Original Android Development] TareqA:
Okay without tweak will i see a difference? Thats my last question. Thanks for replying

Through research i found out kernels allow u to tweak your phone functions like voltage and freq.
[ONE Original Android Development] bdwilk:
No. You will not see a difference.
[ONE Original Android Development] mustang_ssc:
Can anyone report this "user"? He is spamming numerous threads. I cannot do it through phone.
[ONE Original Android Development] thedamager:
I reported him a couple of minutes ago.
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
confirming that this kernel (CM) works on lates LINEAGE OS 7.1.1 on the oneplus one
[ONE Original Android Development] Gawd:
UNOFFICIAL* LineageOS
[ONE Original Android Development] chenrp:
yep.

i know that BOEFFLA won't support it but i wanted to let everyone else know.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Why not?

Once LineageOS is official, it is nothing else than the continued Cyanogenmod.

And my kernels will run on Lineage as they were on CM in the past.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Kundan Wadkar:
Require help with the config app it doesn't seem to work shows kernel pending the kernel flashing was proper but stuck on this can someone plese help how to get the config app working
[ONE Original Android Development] nightfireblaze8:
I'm sorry for the silly question, but does swipe2wake and swipe2sleep work? They don't seem to do anything for me.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Read installation instructions and troubleshooting section on www.boeffla.de.

Yes, what a silly question. If it would not work, I would not have it in the kernel.

So the answer is: Of course it works.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Kundan Wadkar:
Finally it woked but now it shows this popup