yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Battery display issue on some custom roms

Ok, some more news on that. Could not resist to check what they have done there.

The issue is:

Both Bliss as well as Temasek rom changed the battery handling in the health daemon to something new.

My kernel comes with the healthd daemon of official CM, which is not compatible with the one in Bliss and Temasek.

I tested it with a quick test build where I put the one from Temasek in. Then battery display was fine on Temasek.

However, this is not a solution as it does not work at all on official CM (CM shuts directly down after booting up).

So - I will not have a solution for you guys until either

- Bliss/Temasek revert the incompatible stuff again

- CM also changes healthd accordingly

Of course you can always rebuild my kernel with a changed ram disk.

Just I will not do that, cannot spend time on all the various custom rom flavours not following the standards.

At least it is clear to me now what happened (across all devices btw).

It is CLEARLY an incompatibility invented by the mentioned roms, nothing else.

Thanks for understanding

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
Wow thank you. I hate using kernel tuners not named boeffla. They are so annoying.
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
Looks like the Temasek ROM has a fix so your kernel is compatible
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Interesting. Source?

Thanks

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] katinatez:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=63149801
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Yaayyy. Thank you.

That should fix it.

Thanks

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] ranjib:
I didn't read all of this, but is there a fix for the distorted audio in loud situations already? A long time ago Lord Boeffla stated he needs documentation for the qualcomm chip. Did he ask Steve Kondik?
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
No solution to that.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] kantjer:
Could this be a fix for that issue?

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/110690/
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Maybe, this is a patch on rom side, not kernel.

So by nature I cannot comment a lot on that.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] kantjer:
I know it's a ROM patch, but not every issue is a kernel issue ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
That is so true :)

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] cloudx720:
Hey andi after some testing with gpu overclock I can say it does absolutely nothing in terms of performance. At stock and at 657mhz step, the numbers stay exactly the same :( #mydreamsaredestroyed™
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Do not be sad and do not wine, performance is good enough also without overclocking GPU :)

I will wait for some time, maybe someone pops up who can prove the opposite. But if not, I should consider removeing it mid-term.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] cloudx720:
Noo I'm not whining :( i just love pushing my hardware to the limits of performance [emoji1] I know its already fast enough but still [emoji8]
[ONE Original Android Development] ricardowec:
You can sit and wait forever. I am not trying to be pessimistic, but recent story tells us that they care very little about our devices
[ONE Original Android Development] ranjib:
@ audio issues: even Mr. Kondik says

Quite embarrassing, isn't it?
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Indeed. And then I am not surprised when we "small devs" get no hold of the documentation ever.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
New betas

Hi all,

what do you think, time for some experiments now? I guess yes.

I have compiled with some increased toolchain optimisation (O3) this time. Let's see how that behaves.

So please find two new beta kernels for COS12.1 and CM12.1.

COS12.1 -- Version

4.0-beta5

07.10.2015

Built with O3 compiler optimisations and removed size optimisations

build script enhancement to support proprietary modules

CM12.1 -- Version

4.2-beta6

07.10.2015

Built with O3 compiler optimisations and removed size optimisations

build script enhancement to support proprietary modules

Ramdisk updated to official CM12.1 nightly of 06.10.15

Enjoy

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Pank9j:
Thanks andi.
[ONE Original Android Development] drdexter1989:
Dear [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]

I really like your kernel, liked so much on COS12.1, all improvements and features.

Now i'm giving a chance to MIUI 7 but I feel something missing in this rom.

I've read a reply and an answer to The reply from you. But I insist, you should port this kernel to miui, this is The source code on github.com:

https://github.com/X-s/patchrom_miui_oneplus_bacon

The boot.img is located in "others" folder.

Tried your kernel 2.10 cm11s but it doesn't boot correctly.

Thank you, and waiting for your reply...
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
It is simple, I am not doing that for two reasons.

1. I contacted miui team long ago to work together and let me know what is required. They never responded, so I lost being interested.

2. I have no use case for miui myself, sorry. I am not a fan of that rom.

Thanks for understanding

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] KaszasM:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] good morning :) the new release running fine thnaks for the upstream.. just 1 small thing in the main screen in hungarian translation the memory use is reverted it should be : használt = used, szabad =free thats all thank you

didnt chkd on other languages srry :)

edit: nothing wrong, was to early [emoji109]
[ONE Original Android Development] The Dork Knight Rises:
It seems to be correct. You have 2770MB used and 104MB free. It shows similar values for me. (I'm guessing this includes all cached memory too)
[ONE Original Android Development] vicky2131:
Working great on cos12.1 ;) Have tried almost all kernels and i always end up on Boeffla's ultimate kernel. Thank you Andi :)

All ak users should once try this and use it for a week wherein they will know the difference(Not for people who need only kernel customization :)

PS: its just my opinion mates!
[ONE Original Android Development] KaszasM:
yourrright just checked in apps, counts all together
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
I've also tried almost all the kernels around. Boeffla kernel gives me the best mix of performance and battery life. This was already suggested but these settings:

Governor: zzmove

Profile: zzmove relax

CPU Max: 1728

Hotplug: zzmove native default

Touch boost status: off

Its smooth as butter and phone never heats up. I play games, Skype, instagram etc and have no visible slow downs. Try it :D
[ONE Original Android Development] vicky2131:
Yes im on same setup now but with zen i/o and cpu max at 15xx ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] Pank9j:
Could you guys share the complete profile [MENTION=5588551]vicky2131[/MENTION] [MENTION=5972963]Renosh[/MENTION]
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
Exactly as I've stated in the quoted post everything else stock. You can use lower GPU frequency too I'm testing out 330 MHz and its still great
[ONE Original Android Development] Pank9j:
Oh. Thanks :)
[ONE Original Android Development] vicky2131:
governor- zzmove-relax

i/o- zen

cpu max 15xx

gpu max-330

touch boost off

kernel logging off.

edit: i have a doubt [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] . Is there a separate stable version for the 7-10-2015 snapshot release? if no then which dated kernel would be fine with it?
[ONE Original Android Development] Fossxp13:
will try this settings need better battery and lower temp
[ONE Original Android Development] ashutoshmn:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION], Please do a CAF version of your kernel, I can't tell you how much I love this kernel. Have high hopes from you, great work!
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Sorry, but I made that point clear already a while ago.

No caf kernel from me for many reasons.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] ariadnejro:
Sorry to hear that. I have recently moved to a caf rom and battery life is awesome.
[ONE Original Android Development] cloudx720:
imo battery life isn't better on caf based ROMs...I'm on cos12.1 with boeffla kernel and I get over 7+ sot moderate to heavy use.
[ONE Original Android Development] ariadnejro:
imho moving from BlissPop to Temasek unofficial caf rom has led to a significantly improved battery life.
[ONE Original Android Development] magnamentis:
you're totally right, some people like to jump to conclusions. i've seen one guy stating that after he installed an app his power button broke LOL pure coincidences.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Caf is primarily just a hype. Not better or worse than anything else.

Fact remains: I don't have the time for another kernel variant. Especially not when I see no value in doing it myself.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
I agree, I don't seen any difference in the time I tried out CAF.
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
Good morning Andi! I've noticed lately a pretty good battery drain on the latest kernel but using Zane's U511 version of yours. With WiFi off over night and on 3g I have no battery drain. On WiFi either at work using their myfi and at my home using 5ghz, it drains faster. So I posted a dump in the battery thread and [MENTION=1071347]vaisakh[/MENTION]7 mentioned its a kernel issue. So I'm posting a dump here so you can look at it. I appreciate all you do and your help. Thanks.
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
Also look at all the wakelocks.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
I don't have any battery drain caused by wifi.

Wifi drivers are not changed by months, so I highly doubt myself it is something with the kernel. Especially as wifi drivers are even full stock.

Test with official kernel instead of the special kernel, this is what I would recommend.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] sathish804:
In BBS under Kernel wakelocks even I see the same wakelock and I am on the u521 build. Will try with other builds and will see what is causing the drain.
[ONE Original Android Development] Crazy_Oni:
Maybe you should check with an wake lock detector app what is the reason for that. It's not the kernel ?

Send from my OnePlus One with Tapatalk
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
If its not the kernel then what could it be? Well I had to upgrade to get kernel stats in wakelocks detector so I have nothing to show for now. It only shows since I upgraded.

---------- Post added at 09:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:39 AM ----------

Would it make a difference if I was using Optimized hotplug vs default? I've been using zzmove battery yank as well, but always have been doing this gov. Thanks again
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Kernel wake locks are usually triggered by userspace apps and processes.

It would not make any sense when the kernel itself holds a wake lock.

The challenge is to find the app or sync process causing wifi to be used a lot.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
Well that seems hard lol. Right now I've been on LTE all day and I'm on pace to get 8 hrs of sot vs leas than 7 recently. Not sure what it is.
[ONE Original Android Development] sathish804:
I enabled the Scan Always available option in the Wifi Advanced settings which was causing the wakelock I mentioned earlier. After disabling the scanning always option that wakelock almost gone.
[ONE Original Android Development] suaverc118:
That's off in my end.
[ONE Original Android Development] Droidalok:
From your earlier logs it appears greenify is the only thing that was using the network. Maybe something is broken in that... or maybe I just read it completely wrong lol. Apologies if I did. It is definitely not the kernel!:laugh:
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
cm12.1 kernel update

Hi all,

after being back from my short holidays, here we go for a pure maintenance update of the CM12.1 kernel.

Version

4.2-beta7

16.10.2015

Ramdisk updated to official CM12.1 nightly of 16.10.15

Enjoy

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Pablo.x:
What about the new COS12.1 OTA? Seems to be just bug fixes and some security patches...

I think lastest COS beta version will work [emoji14]

Sent from my Bacon con huevos. Euphoria/COS12.1 + Boeffla
[ONE Original Android Development] erorcun:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]

Have you ever considered adding profile quick setting via CM SDK? It could be awesome.

Thanks for this awesome kernel btw.
[ONE Original Android Development] cloudx720:
What update lol?
[ONE Original Android Development] michaelg117:
When using the newest beta(any beta) I don't get any media sound from music players, this isn't a problem when running 4.1

This was also happening on the AK kernel.

Running latest CM 12.1
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
What new cos12.1 ota?

I did not get one and kernel code is unchanged for more than 20 days.

No. I d know exactly what you mean.

Can you elaborate a bit?

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Pablo.x:
This https://forums.oneplus.net/threads/cos-12-1-yog4pas2ql-update.386525/page-5#post-13683488

But as you see, it seems that lastest beta should work fine

Sent from my Bacon con huevos. Euphoria/COS12.1 + Boeffla
[ONE Original Android Development] ricardowec:
Sad to say Lord, but I had to move to unoffcial Blisspop CAF build and hence resing your awsome kernel.

Hope we can meet again soon,

R
[ONE Original Android Development] kurtextrem:
lol.. came today. I guess this is from the latest Play Store version.
[ONE Original Android Development] vicky2131:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] latest cos12.1 doesnt work with beta5(cos12.1 kernel)

Issues: No more live display, quick settings not available inside settings(will add more if i see mate)
[ONE Original Android Development] jokermithun:
It works great with COS12.1 ....what ru talking about:confused:
[ONE Original Android Development] vicky2131:
Have you tried with the ota which came out today?
[ONE Original Android Development] jokermithun:
which OTA ???? im on COS 12.1:confused:

can u post a screenshot???
[ONE Original Android Development] erorcun:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]

I'm talking about that: https://www.cyngn.com/developer-blog/introducing-the-cyanogen-platform-sdk

Changing kernel profile from quick tile would be awesome.
[ONE Original Android Development] cloudx720:
What ota lol? I'm getting nothing, post screenie :D
[ONE Original Android Development] vicky2131:
Check here---> http://cyanogen-ota-bacon.somee.com/

the file from above page doesnt work, but i have the official links

OTA Incremental Update: http://builds.cyngn.com/incremental/bacon/cm-bacon-7be76f9310-to-49d90510ef-signed.zip

Full update zip: http://builds.cyngn.com/cyanogen-os...bacon/49d90510ef/cm-12.1-YOG4PAS2QL-bacon.zip

Fastboot zip: http://builds.cyngn.com/cyanogen-os...90510ef/cm-12.1-YOG4PAS2QL-bacon-fastboot.zip

No screenshot, i reverted back since it didnt work with beta 5 of cos12.1.

If suppose your flashing--->(twrp doesnt flash the 600mb file also ,so dont try. but you can fastboot previous build and do a manual ota via cm recovery which i did and then flash twrp and then beta 5 and then had those issues and reverted back)

Lord sorry for the off topic!
[ONE Original Android Development] cloudx720:
Nice! Thanks.
[ONE Original Android Development] OberstGrausam:
Works with newest temasek V155. Hail to you lord boeffla , #deutschegründlichkeit.^^ Considering my donation, I'd say: money well spent :good:

Anyway, I think it's a pitty that cm reverted those commits because wifi takes now significantly longer to connect.
[ONE Original Android Development] Chillz88:
seems that the cm11 version doesnt work with the new mahdi... i couldnt boot it anyone else tried it on the new 10/30 mahdi rom?

updated- it does work.. my bad..:)
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
Reflash your rom and use beta 6 or 7, not 7a as the rom isn't up to date yet with that kernel..
[ONE Original Android Development] f100cleveland:
Are you using beta7 or beta7a? Sorry its a dumb question but beta7 is the one you need on that build.
[ONE Original Android Development] acuicultor:
Saw you posting same question on various kernel threads, instead of spamming the threads, why you dont read the OP? There you have your answers.

Sent from my Crispy Bacon
[ONE Original Android Development] mumaster20:
Dont know if this is supposed to happen, but after turning on the 'optimized' setting in the hotplug settings the phone goes in to single core mode. (see screenie)

Even when going into antutu benchmark to stress the cpu it stays in single core mode. Also the 'default' option for the hotplug settings locks the phone to single core.

Is this supposed to happen boeffla? i've read the beta 6 changes and couldnt find it locking to single core on the optimized setting.

Edit: Running latest Mahdi rom (30-10) with the beta 7 boeffla kernel
[ONE Original Android Development] orangerot.:
It's intended to lock the phone to one core when it's in idle to safe up battery. If you're using the phone the normal hotplug should kick in and depending on the usage more cores should go online. On default there are 2 cores online even in idle (as it's on stock)

If your phone is on one core all the time I guess you'll get lots of lags.(you're getting them or is everything fine while using the phone?) Maybe the monitoring app you're using is displaying something wrong. Maybe try a different one?

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
In optimized mode in idle the phone uses 1 core.

With load it scales up to 4 cores.

At least this is how it should work and it is like that for me.

I check with Chainfire's perfmon.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Looks like mpdecision process is not running.

Don't know if in Mahdi rom this is maybe disabled?
[ONE Original Android Development] mumaster20:
Ill try it later with another rom! will report the results.
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
If you look, you'll see i was wakelocked by the OS, but still am super impressed by these results.. I had no issues with all cores working when needed... I was using a performance based setup, but with the optimised option selected, normally I only get 24hrs (4+ hrs sot) with this setup.. There is a definite improvement.. I did notice a noteable performance drop though, but overall it was still more responsive than many kernels using a similar setup.. ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] TiVON:
Wow, dude. That's a very nice result with wakelocks. I wonder what it'd be without those :). Do you need help fixing them or are you happy with these results?

Maybe I should flash Boeffla too reading this!

Verstuurd vanaf mijn One A0001 met Tapatalk
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
I can manage them, I just didn't pay attention until I checked the stats.. ;)

I'm sure I could squeeze another hour or two of sot without these wakelocks... But even with them, I am very happy.. ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] doctor78SI:
What kind of ROM kernel combination are zou using?
[ONE Original Android Development] skodaslx:
Just had a reboot. Here is the debug file. Just remove the .zip.
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
That was with the 10/25 saber carbon and beta 7... Slim/row speedmod/optimised and various other small tweaks..
[ONE Original Android Development] ZaneZam:
fix is on the way, stay tuned!

meanwhile switch to another governor than zzmoove ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] striked0wn:
had the same problem too (used stability test and perfmon); was ok after reboot
[ONE Original Android Development] cerealguy:
Anyone have problems with video recording? I'm on 02/11 Liquidsmooth nighlty and Boeffla beta 7a.... When I try to record a video, after 3 seconds it stops! With liquismooth stock kernel, there are no problem.... :confused:
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
No problem.

See you soon again.

Yes, Google once again... Like already a year ago.

It is of course complete nonsense.

Who knows what they consider malicious here, especially all of a sudden.

Everyone can check my app everywhere (try virustotal.com and upload the app to get it checked by 56 scanning engines), the result is always negative.

Ok. I need to check that out one day.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] infatality:
I believed it's because your apps had the ability to change selinux mode thus Google thinks it's an melware.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
This might be a good point.

I will try to obfuscate the code in that area with the next app version. Maybe that helps to not get it detected by Google.

Very sad I have to deal with such a crap (thanks Google, I know why I took the right decision to leave play store 1,5 years ago again, you just confirmed it). This is time I could use for some useful development instead of having to cheat Google again. Sad sad sad.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] Pablo.x:
Ramdisk it's different in lastest COS12.1 cause sometimes my screen doesn't wake up with beta 5.

Guys, for more settings: About Phone > Advanced Mode

Sent from my Bacon con huevos. Euphoria/COS12.1 + Boeffla
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Unfortunately I am not able to download the files (access denied).

Somebody has them already?

Very suspicious, no big deal was made by OnePlus for the update. Usually you see it popping up everywhere...

Thanks

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] kurtextrem:
I've downloaded, but didn't flash yet.
[ONE Original Android Development] infatality:
Yup.. Quite a fair bit of apps on play store that has the ability to change selinux has been taken down automatically and no question asked or anything.. Namely > kernel auditor, elementx kernel apps etc.. And create a fuss on the relevant thread on xda, when user has to pay the apps again when it's taken down. Sadly I'm one of it who's affected when I'm in nexus 5...[emoji36]
[ONE Original Android Development] Pablo.x:
I downloaded it from this link: http://builds.cyngn.com/cyanogen-os...bacon/49d90510ef/cm-12.1-YOG4PAS2QL-bacon.zip

Sent from my Bacon con huevos. Euphoria/COS12.1 + Boeffla
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Fully understand this frustration.

And this is exactly why I decided to not rely on Google for my apps anymore. To especially never have users running into that situations.

Everyone who donated gets a life time code for the app, and the app can be used whatever Google does.

And yeah, I read about the fuss in some other threads. Confirming my decision around 1,5 years ago was right.

Ok, thanks. This link works for me too.

Will look at it latest on Monday and replace ramdisk (no other code changes I have seen in their repo).

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
App version 2.2.05 is out, just pushed it.

So, let's see if that was enough code obfuscation to cheat Google for some time again :)

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] infatality:
Now Google is detecting your website as malware.. [emoji33]
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Yes, someone else reported that already.

I asked them for scanning it again to remove that bull****.

Can take around 24 hours.

Just use a browser that does not use any Google sh**t.

They are f***** bast***rds !!!

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Just curious... which browser were you using?

All, I changed the links to speed up Google's clean up process.

So, please visit www.boeffla-kernel.de in order to do the downloads instead of using direct links which are not existing anymore.

Andi
[ONE Original Android Development] molonad:
No i think Mistr boeffla wont support caf in future, i tried caf too and i Wasnt excited with it, i didnt see any battery improvements and performance was disgusting i think i Will Never use it.
[ONE Original Android Development] andip71:
Correct. Caf is not interesting for me at the moment.

Andi