yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Justin541:
Hey guys and gals, I'm having a huge issue with my nexus 5. Today I used the stock recovery to clear the Cache. It looked like it had froze so like an idiot i forced the phone to restart. Now it says my cache partition is messed up and my storage isn't mounted. I also show an unknown base-band so I cant use cell service. I can however still boot my phone up and go into the bootloader screen and also boot it up normally. I looked up and attempted to fastboot the cache.img file back onto the phone, but every time I try I get an error message saying "failed : remote not supported in locked device" something or other like that in the CMD screen. My phone is stock, bootloader is locked and I do not have root or anything else on it. what do I have to do to flash this cache.img file and get my phone working again? I looked up all the info so far but I'm at a dead end. I can figure out basic things but im no genius unfortunately. I'm at the point where Ill paypal a reward to whoever helps me. Please someone help me. I en
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MARKOZD15:
How can you use fastboot on locked bootloader? I don't think it's possible
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] geemaan:
Try to clear the cache again.it worked for me.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ben36:
Unlock the bootloader and try
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] simms22:
you can just reflash the cache using fastboot. yes, you can use fastboot on any locked or unlocked device.

---------- Post added at 06:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:23 PM ----------

how did you unlock your bootloader with fastboot when your device was locked when you used fadtboot? yea. any locked or unlocked nexus device.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ben36:
Lol. I guess that makes perfect sense!
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] Blaalad12:
Hi guys. I rang my local store here today and got a price of €420 euro for the z3 without contract which seems pretty good given that the samsung alpha here is €570. Also the z3 compact is priced at being £430 in the uk so not quiet sure why its cheaper here in Ireland as usually we pay more for products then anywhere else ha

Anyways iam tempted to pull the trigger but for some confusing reviews i have read! Most reviews claim the resolution is poor and the screen is not as sharp as the competition, images look washed out and the camera is not as good as you would expect from a 20.7mp camera , color accuracy is way off and images look washed out etc and one review claimed the battery life was ok but not as good as sony claimed!

However i have also seen two reviews that say the opposite and claim the display is the best 720p they have ever seen, the camera is among the best out there and that battery life is incredible!

Can anyone that owns the device give they're impressions?

Currently own a htc one m7 which has been good to me . I often change phones regularly but have kept this for almost 2 years and it works flawlessly and is still as snappy as ever to this day so iam slightly worried about the z3 compact not being a significant upgrade! Ill miss the htc sense widgets and although iam not fan of the sony home screen and lock screen look , Iam loving the specs and the fact i can use the phone comfortable in one hand! Would have got the z3 but see it as being a little too big
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] degraaff:
I'll soon be buying this phone as well. About the resolution, my current phone has the same resolution on a slightly smaller display of 4.3", with a pixel density of 342 ppi and the image is so sharp that I cannot distinguish pixels with the naked eye no matter how hard I try. The Z3 Compact has 319 ppi on its 4.6" display, which really isn't much lower at all. I can imagine the pixels will still be too small to distinguish with the naked eye. Okay, maybe if, for some reason, you use the phone under a magnifying glass or if you hold it flat against your face, it won't look very sharp (duh). But if you just use your phone like normal, I'm sure the display on the Z3C will appear perfectly sharp.

About the colour: ExpertReviews, for example, claims that the whites are white enough (they describe it as "ice white"). They mention the white balance option on the device, but said that they felt no need to adjust the white balance.
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] LastQuark:
With regard to camera quality, most reviews had it in Superior Auto Mode that saves the file about 8MP. Those who own one are saying the Manual Mode is where you can see the pic quality excel. I trust DXO mark more than others. Here's how they rank the phones based on IQ. This is the older generation Z2 that is using very similar lens albeit there is slight improvement on the Z3. Just not sure if the improvement is in the hardware or software. Full review can be found here:

http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Sony-Xperia-Z2-overview-Revised-model-takes-first-place-in-Mobile-rankings

[IMG="DXO Mark Mobile Phones"]http://www.dxomark.com/var/ezwebin_site/storage/images/media/images/chart5/102199-1-eng-US/chart.jpg[/IMG]
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] xShin:
I just got my Z3c today; I've had a M8 until today and a M7 before that. I honestly can't tell that the screen is 720 instead of 1080, and everything, from pictures to videos to text, looks very sharp. I don't see any color accuracy issues, and I'd say color reproduction is the same (as far as I can tell) as on the M8 and M7. I love the size of the device, and it's a great feeling to be able to use my phone with 1 hand lol. I'd say go for it!
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] Cronis:
Uhh they have the Nokia 1020 under the Iphone 5 and s4... that can't be right O.o
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] stormbeta:
First off, 720/1080p means nothing. Pixel density is what actually matters, and 720p at 4.6" is more than high enough to be a non-issue unless you hold the phone up to your eyeballs.

Likewise, megapixel count doesn't mean as much as people think. The sensor size matters more, and at 1/3" it's larger than most. It's not the best smartphone camera on the market, but it's still quite good.

The colors are poorly calibrated out of the box, and it does look bad, but it's trivial to fix in the color settings, so that's not really a big deal.

Battery life is never as good as the manufacturer claims, but it's still pretty good so far. I haven't had it long enough to really tell you for sure though.
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] Dsteppa:
- I'm sorry but any review that complains about the resolution not being sharp enough you can just ignore, because that reviewer clearly has no idea what he/she is talking about...

- Color calibration in terms of the screen can be changed to your liking, most/many people don't like the default color scheme so they did some adjustments.

- Camera really isn't as bad as they say... in some situations it's not as good as the rest, but it's NOT BAD (That's mostly in low light situations)

My tip for you:

Don't get your phone based on other people reviews, because they seem to affect you A LOT! There are more positive reviews than bad ones, but yet you seem to have picked out the bad ones.

Get the phone in your hands (in a shop), play with it and then decide.
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] Why So Serious?:
The display for me is the single most important aspect of any mobile, and I've not bought any of the Z Series because of it (although the Z2 display did look good). For that reason I was extremely judgemental when first using the Z3C.

I don't think you have anything to worry about in terms of quality or sharpness. The contrast is great and the default calibration does indeed produce icy whites (which I personally prefer to warmer whites).

I haven't used the camera yet, but other things that have impressed me are the build quality - especially the finish of the plastic sides, the bezels, which looks smaller in person than the promo photos suggest, and the sheer speed of the device. It's incredibly snappy!

I'm more impressed than I thought I'd be :)
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] degraaff:
[MENTION=3581860]stormbeta[/MENTION], it's a 1/2.3 sensor :)
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] satchef1:
The problem with the 1020 is it's great at certain things, awful at others. It's a really inconsistent camera. DxO's ratings reward consistency - a camera that's pretty good at everything trumps one that's really good at some things. That's why the last few iPhones have scored so high - they do a decent job of most things.

In their element, the 1020 and 808 are unbeaten. Unfortunately they aren't that great as day-to-day snappers.
[Xperia Z3 Compact General] clouds5:
I'm very impressed by this device so far coming from a galaxy s3. The display is absolutely fine. Everyone that says otherwise is just a spec whore (xcuse my language). And you can even tweak the colors yourself!

And the best part: 720p with high end hardware means silky smooth operation in every situation. I have never held an android device this fast. Even turning the screen on is just instant. No lag whatsoever. I'd say this is even faster than iPhone.

Camera? I have no idea about quality but the dedicated button is more important for my use than quality. If I want to make quality pictures I don't use my smartphone anyway..

If you want a high end smartphone in a smaller form factor this is the best device out there. No doubt about it.
[G3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chacho_2me:
can anyone help me with this?

i am on D855 internation version

but sadly, cannot turn on hotspot..just telling me TURNING ON

did sql lite editor, but also cannot manage to find the parameter 564 (tether_entitlement....)

any help is greatly appreciated
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] v941726:
OTG cable and Sd card won't work. Tried several apps and just can't get it to work.
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] jimyv:
umm

We know.
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] v941726:
Oh. Guess it's been tried. What is with that. Couldn't get it to work on my N10 either. That sucks!
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] aaronkatrini:
It should work on n10 with a custom rom
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] v941726:
I got rid of the N10. I have to admit that the Kindle beats it many ways. I like the Fire OS. Although I would like to modify it a little more. Not much info here on xda. Surprised. I guess there aren't too many people that have one. The battery life is too phenomenal to rom it. And it's fast and smooth. And i don't think I even saw a rom for it anyway. Didn't look that hard, but don't think I want one either. With the N10, I could not find anything and gave up as to OTG. Even roms. People said it was hit or miss. You were lucky to just get the right unit. I still find it tough to believe that that is case. But I'm not a dev. Seems like what's more in demand.

For what I do with phones and computers, it usually has to affect me first. Then I come up with a solution. But i'm not a coder. And don't know much about Unix/Linux.
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] aaronkatrini:
The "problem" with the kindle hdx is that the OS is proprietary , and hacking it is illegal and devs are not even trying, only one has been able to hack it (@jcase), but he cannot release it since Dmca does not cover it,

long story short - there is not much you can do with it, unless try some HDX Nexus rom...
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] v941726:
Yeah. But we all void are warranties. That's mostly why we're here. I have ways around that anyway. It's just that this tab seems better than others. I just want to hack it to a point where I can do all the crazy network and server and PC stuff that I do. But keep the Fire OS. Everything can be hacked. And it doesn't hurt anyone. It's mine now. Not Amazons! I know, an age old issue. But it is a good tablet and I think worth the hack. ?. I'm getting there, slow but sure. But there are just a few more things I would like to do.
[Xperia Tablet Z Themes and Apps] genokun:
Anyone can share this theme as apk????????

https://play.google.com/store/apps/d...snoopy.theme.l

Thankssss
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] maxprzemo:
Hi!

So it's new rom maked by CRX Team - CrystalPA (CrystalParanoidAndroid) based on AOSPA 4.x with functions from CrystalPA.

Features is here!

Chanelog is here!

Download is here!

Gapps (recommend

nano

or

pico

)

Full Wipe and Format System

Flash CrystalPA

Flash GAPPS

Reboot

- cr3pt

- eagleeyetom

- OmniROM

- SlimROM

- TeamCanjica

- Rox

- judas77

- Daveee10

- AOSPA

- Zodex

- uberlaggydarwin

- WKD622

https://github.com/CRXTeam
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] maxprzemo:
Reserved
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] mnupea:
Looks good. Does it have any bugs?

Keep it up!
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] Nathanabrahams:
I will try tomorrow, sounds great, any screen shots?
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] acrocosm:
Hopefully this is almost as debloated as AOSPA. I hate it when we get rid of corporate bloat just to be fed with community bloat. No offence to anyone's hard efforts :angel:
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] danny19901:
If this based on PA does this mean it has Card recents and Dynamic Status Bar
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] axljohn:
Take a look at the changelog. From there I'm afraid you might be wrong. I guess we're on the same boat. No offense too devs. :cowboy:

---------- Post added at 10:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:49 AM ----------

@OP why is it in the changelogs that you keep on adding and removing peek/active display? :confused:
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] cocon1609:
thank you very much! great rom . i will try , now :D keep it up!
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] exodius48:
[MENTION=5050926]maxprzemo[/MENTION]

Another KK rom, will try this one.

Keep update this rom, because almost devs abandoned rom for codina. (y)
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] crisis_trustee:
Hi, CRX Team!

Please show us screenshots from your new ROM for Samsung Codina.

Thank you in advance!
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
All cm roms using TC sources will have broken camera, for that reason there are no updates at least from me.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] exodius48:
Could it be solved?
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
Yes but don´t ask me how, i don´t know.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] exodius48:
OK

[MENTION=5050926]maxprzemo[/MENTION] for gaps, which gapss that suitable for this rom? PA gapps, or CrystalPA (if present).
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] maxprzemo:
Gapps

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2397942

select NANO or PICO
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] S.AMU:
Seems to be a great new rom. Will try it out later. I hope it is compatible with chronokernel.

Did anyone already tried out this rom? Are there any bugs or so?

What? does the actual cm11 build have a broken camera?
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] crisis_trustee:
Thank you, CRX Team, for screenshots. ;)
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] Nathanabrahams:
I tried this rom and there are things to like And things to dislike I like how fluid it is and that it comes with a equaliser but I don't like the s4 styled settings and couldn't find a switch to turn it off, also I don't like manual changing dpi if you could add a option to change it i would like it.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] acrocosm:
Yes, what do you mean broken camera? I thought video streaming broken. OK, I miss HDR but that doesn't make the camera broken o.O?

Also, why TC specifically? Don't they use the same code for camera as TN? Sir you confuse me
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] crisis_trustee:
What's the difference between ROM from cpa_codina-CrystalPA-7.00-20140919.zip and ROM from cpa_codina-CrystalPA-7.00-20140925.zip?
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] maxprzemo:
cpa_codina-CrystalPA-7.00-20140919.zip This is the Alpha version . Do not install it.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] crisis_trustee:
Are cwm_6.0.5.0.img.gz and d605_cwm.zip recoveries for Samsung Codina?
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] maxprzemo:
No

This is for LG d605
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
Last commits from CM causes errors, so if you build an actual rom based on CM or with cm framework the camera will not work.

Previus build will work, but try to build a rom with cm base.

Anyone read the last post of BS? You can read camera is not working.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] maxprzemo:
Camera works very well.

There is no reason for concern
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
Only on CM roms.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] S.AMU:
First rewiev of this rom:

Seem to ba an great rom, but there are some little bugs and mistakes::

1) in performance settings you can set "undervolting". We don't need it, because we have NT-app, also there is an typo. Its called "undevolting"

2) when I try to open "vibrator intensity settings" it crashes.

3)I think the stock-recent-app-switcher is better :)

4) swiping down in recent apps don't open floating app

5)I don't like the tabbed settings style

6)in the quick settings panel "screen timeout" is missing? Why?? :crying:
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] judas1977:
I thought that camera bug was fixed long time ago (it's caused by differences between 4.4.3 and 4.4.4 or 4.4.2 and 4.4.3 afair).
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] acrocosm:
Ok, my quick impressions...

I don't like it that settings are split into categories. At least not in the way it's implemented. I need more strokes/taps to get to where I need to go that way. If you definately like it for character in your roms you could at least make it possible to change tab by swiping left/right

I find the dpi settings too dense for my liking. I may be getting old but I have a hard time. 220 is a good value for me and lower than the default that's for older people too. At least I would expect to find a way in settings to change it, but that was missing

You can find "performance" under "crystalpa settings" AND "legacy parts" you should remove one instance

You added features that are not really essential or even usefull and yet you didn't add taskbar brightness, on a device without light sensor this is a must have feature. It's worth to ditch pies, real dark, navigation bars (on a device that already has HW buttons) and all other gimmicks just to add tha single feature

Why would anyone add nova launcher or any similar launcher instead of the open source equivalent is totaly beyond my scope of reality. Unless if you are affiliated with the people developing that particular launcher and get a share from sales, in which case I understand

I had the same problem with the last version of the original PA -> I'm unable to install some apps, they say they are not compatible with my version of android, which is not valid. E.g. "sicksky launcher" and "hunters: episode one"

Are you planing to use paranoid ota for updates? If no then it's redundant and should be removed from the rom

Not really important but the bootscreen logo animation has jagged edges, it doesn't look so good

In any case, i neet to test it further for stability, but so far apart from the issues above it looks promishing and is quite fast too. Thank you for your work!
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
Nope, you can check my last build of BS, and AntaresOne build CM11 for janice and have the same problem.

But it´s caused by a commit/s of cm.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] judas1977:
@up

I don't see that bug on my SlimSaber KK. And don't remember having it on my previous projects...
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] acrocosm:
1) "undervolting" is the correct word. But, who are "We"? I like that feature added there you should speak for yourself ^_^

2) +1

3) +1

...

5) +1 but I'm ok with swipe left/right

---------- Post added at 12:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:33 PM ----------

@batlin instead of posting you should concentrate on next build to fix those few unimportant issues damn it! Although I'm sure you have already fixed them a long time ago and just forgot to post

(Just joking :p)
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
C´mon anybody read "CM base"

Slim is based on AOSP not CM, why no one read that?

Pd:sorry for off topic, but i have to tell this.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] judas1977:
Could you remind me what issues you are talking about? I think i'll release last KK build (there is nothing to do with Slimbean 4.3, altough i said there will be at least one more build;)) before leaving... Actually i'm testing new slimsaber build, but i have random reboots (maybe it's kernel related, i'm testing chrono kernel 1.3 and no reboot for now.

And, [MENTION=5050926]maxprzemo[/MENTION], forgive me that little OT in the name of our long friendship ;)
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
Batlin.

The issues that i´m talking is only in cm based roms or with cm framework, only on that roms (BeanStalk, CM, PAC) camera isn´t working because something in the framework have issues with how OMX work.

And i repeat, ONLY on CM based roms or with CM framework with last commits.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] ChronoMonochrome:
Afaik this feature only works on janice. It won't work on codina due to the fact that there is no support in kernel.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] judas1977:
I was talking to [MENTION=1242317]acrocosm[/MENTION]. You should notice it, as you wanted to teach other to pay attention during reading forum post, shouldn't you?

And as for your problem, maybe it's camera app issue, not the ROM itself (some time ago there was one commit needed to get it work)
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] rol525:
Sorry for that.

Send me that commit i will look it.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] PolishVodka:
Vibration intensity feature isn't related to kernel parts, as I remember this working on Liquid, Slim, Mahdi....this is only time in ms, how long vibrations should be after pressing a key.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] judas1977:
I cannot do it right now. Simple test: try third party camera. If it's working, you'll know where problem is. EOT.
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] ChronoMonochrome:
ah, okay, I mixed this setting with this https://github.com/KINGbabasula/KING_kernel/commit/4a83e7c1a7341be68c320d009c6b0677fd7c2809
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] S.AMU:
" We" are all ace 2 users, and why should we have this option in settings when it is already in novathor-app where you can set the exact value. [emoji2]
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] acrocosm:
Well, in no particular order the only things that come to my mind is:

some kind of charging indicator while powered off

I don't know if that intentional but I miss extended power menu with recovery/download options.

incoming call low volume bug

I think that sums it all. Otherwise it's a perfect, rock-solid KK rom. You did an excellent job there m8

Sorry for off-topic from my part too

---------- Post added at 05:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:55 PM ----------

I regard performance option as a less complicated and safer tweaking app for semi-power users. The NT app is more complex and powerfull and specificaly for undervolting you have to specify the voltage yourself. That means you'll have to dig throught posts and threads to figure out what to do if you are not familiar. This new option is just a tick box, you do not have to think or do any reasearch, you just enable it. Provided that it's safe, it is a nice feature for not so advanced users. That's why I disagree
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] exodius48:
#2 I got it too.

Also font is too small I think.

No option to disable CRT animation and Why still using KTU84P?
[Galaxy Ace II Android Development] needo2:
Pie, Halo, Omni-switch, etc. It's like they come in packs, like if a ROM has Halo you know it has Pie, Omni-switch and etc too, I don't understand like I think Omni-switch is really unnecessary but it's just my opinion, some of these features are useful but when you put them all in a ROM they just become bloatware worse than Samsung's

This comment has no purpose what-so-ever I just wanted to say something that was in my mind for a long time