yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] reds28heem:
I'm usinf stock everything i just rooted the phone. it ask me to grant root access i select yes, then thats when i get the pop up box with the error. i dont know what file im looking for or how to get it if if font exist.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] elesbb:
Its telling you what file isn't there, which may not be there on a Stock everything. But just get a root explorer and navigate to the root of the phone then to the folder named dev then look for a file named uinput. If its not there you might need to flash a kernel. However, I am pretty certain that file should be there on all linux systems.

EDIT: If you need, i could write a simple app to look and test if the file is there. But it should be simple enough using a root explorer :)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] reds28heem:
OK. What kernel should I flash to get the file there if its not. Also the BT/ Joystick app works fine when I flashed CM11. I'm trying to get it working on Stock though.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] elesbb:
I personally use and LOVE ktoonsez's TouchWiz kernel. However, any TouchWiz kernel found in the T-Mobile Android Original Development thread should work. Also, before you do that, if you really wanna stay truly stock, run these commands in a terminal window:

Note: Every new line means you press enter after the typed text.

su

ls -l /dev/uinput

and then paste the results here. that should tell you everything about the file, including if it exists or not.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] reds28heem:
Ok thanks. I'll have to flash back to stock first. Im currently running cm11.

Edit: I flashed my restored my phone back to TouchWiz stock rom I had backed up. Then just flashed ktoonsez's latest kernel, now it's working. But the file was there when I checked before I flashed the kernel. I think with the stock kernel the app wasn't getting full root access or something to find it.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] elesbb:
That could be possible. Or that the kernel was denying any inputs to it that weren't from the system or something. But glad you got it working!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] reds28heem:
Yes I got it working. But now I'm having the same problem I had with my Moto X where everything works fine then after a minute or 2 il (if that) I can't longer go in to edit mode and none of the mapped touch input works at all. Ex. I start the app, click ime to BT/joystick center turns yellow then I search for controller it finds the controller, I then click JT on turns yellow and everything it's suppose to do. I then back out like it says to do. I'm then able to go into edit mode and set up things as normal. Now here's the problem. Once I set the button I wanted mapped and place it over the the touch button I want it to control it saves and everything but once I go to play it's not even registering anything when I push the controller. Then after a few minutes I can't even get back to edit mode. When I go back into the BT/Joystick center app the JT is now off.

So basically I'm not able to do anything after I mapped the touch buttons to the controller. And then some how the JT turns off by its self. Now one ever helped me when I had the Moto X. Seems the only way for this app to run is with stock. Cause it was working flawless with cm11 on this phone and the Moto X.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] elesbb:
sounds like the app is getting garbage collected. Instead of backup out of it, try pressing the home button.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] reds28heem:
Didnt work ..Ready to give up
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] elesbb:
Tbh, it sounds like poor programming. Never used the app personally though. And you say it always works on CM11? It wouldn't surprise me if the kernel is killing the app due to memory loss or something. CM11 probably uses less memory.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] reds28heem:
Yeah. It sucks. But thanks for all your help. I'll just wait to see if I can try something else.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] elesbb:
If you want to give me the apk i could probably mod it to hold a notificiation while you are using the app, that way it can't get killed. Is the app paid or not?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] reds28heem:
It's paid.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 5] sebanmac:
I am also having the same issue (cannot get access to /dev/uinput). I searched for the file using es file explorer and found that file inside sys/modules/uinput. can i just copy paste that inside dev/ ( i am using paranoid android on one plus one.).
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] litoo:
Hi

I wanna Install Modded Google play on my HTC One Dual SIM but I cant

I try to install with lucky patcher but after reboot there is no change!!!

I try to install it by Google play modded installer (by ChelpuS) too.

but after reboot there is no change,Just like lucky patcher!!!

I dont know what to do anymore!

please help me!

sorry for my bad english!
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bdizzle1686:
From what I understand, discussion and support for lucky patcher is prohibited/banned here on XDA, so u probably aren't gonna get much help here with that...
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] litoo:
I just say that I've try this app too

but if there is another way to install modded google play

I'd be grateful if anyone help me with that!
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bdizzle1686:
What I mean is, it's not JUST Lucky Patcher that is banned here. Any apps such as Lucky Patcher, Blackmart, OR Modded Google Play Store all fall into the same category as they can all be used to illegally gain paid apps without having to actually pay,which in turn screws the developers of said apps, and as XDA is a developers forum, it's pretty strictly prohibited for any support for these apps/programs..
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] coal686:
This thread has been closed due to the reasons given above. Please remember to post according to the rules.

Thanks,

coal686
[General Marketing & SEO] gyuri bp:
It’s a well-known fact that the most important requirement of successful international distribution of an app is to be available on local languages.

But it does not mean that you should localize your app at all!

We developed a plugin for android apps that makes possible to translate the app by its users themselves on the phone. There are always fans of your app who pleasures to contribute in anything regarding your app. They will translate the app. All the other users can download and use these translations through the same plugin.

You can understand it easily by downloading the demo android app which already contains the plugin. (“App localization demo” on GooglePlay)

The plugin is free, you can download here or can see it on GHithub.

Any question and feedback is welcome.
[General Marketing & SEO] gyuri bp:
app translation on phone demo

See the app demo http://www.transround.com/?utm_source=xda&utm_medium=mktglocalization&utm_campaign=goingglobal
[General Marketing & SEO] Kronetgames:
It should be interesting! I am developer from Ukraine, and now we have a problem that localization for about 4-5 lang, what we need it's very costly. I can't beleive that it will work, but i will try it...Thanks for sharing.
[General Marketing & SEO] gyuri bp:
Hello, I downloaded your game, it should work if the app is native and all the phrases on screen use standard android resource handling. In case you have any issue you can contact me directly too.
[General Marketing & SEO] BoyrkMM:
Very impressive, I'm just a beginner. I loved the idea of your game!
[General Marketing & SEO] Netforza:
Will it work with games compiled with Haxe OpenFL?
[General Marketing & SEO] gyuri bp:
Unfortunately this time cross-platform developments are not supported, only Android.

However resources translated on Android version can be used on other platforms as well.
[General Marketing & SEO] gyuri bp:
We prepared a plugin for Android Studio and IntelliJ IDEA to provide automated integration of Nativer SDK. It is available on Github:https://github.com/Transround/Native...android-studio and in IntelliJ plugin repository http://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/7637?pr=androidstudio

In case you use Android Studio or IntellJ, you can make your app translated to 70+ languages and be ready for further translation by your users within a few minutes. Try it – you only risk only 5-10 minutes of your time to discover an exciting and suprisingly effective new technology.
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
I did a little research on the grip shells for the moto g (as i usually do before ordering something) and from others experiences with them it was pretty unanimous that the texture of the back was exactly the same as the black shell that comes with the phone.

Well i received it today and i was disappointed to find that it does differ in texture, the original black shell has a smooth soft texture whereas the black grip shell has an even smoother but tacky texture. The phone just feels a lot cheaper with the grip shell on and feels uncomfortable in the hand due to it's straight edges so i will be returning it

I just thought i would post this up for those of you who are interested in buying the grip shell now and expect it to be the same texture as the original black shell that comes with the phone, the one i ordered was dispatched and sold by Amazon so i doubt it's a knock off and the most plausible explanation is that Motorola may have just changed the design/materials

This is the exact one i ordered http://www.amazon.co.uk/Motorola-Gr...=1411745664&sr=8-1&keywords=moto+g+grip+shell
[Moto G Accessories] didit456:
Yes, i feel the same.

In Indonesia, Moto G only gave a black back cover so i consider to buy the Grip Shell, but not from an authorized motorola seller. Not so expensive, $15. And yes the back material was not the same as doff finishing that i had on the original back cover. i doubt that my new grip shell was a fake. and another funny thing is sometimes i put off the grip shell to clean up my moto G and after 3 weeks, i got my grip shell stretchy. So i'm sure that the grip shell that i buy is a fake. China fake. and the most thing that i regret is the Lazada, authorized motorola seller sold grip shell for $13. i wanna kill myself :( :(

I don't know if amazon did sell the fake one but if you buy the original grip shell, you should get the retail package, like this

[IMG="gripshell"]http://im1.olx.biz.id/l/67/33/67107331_5401600f25ccc.jpg[/IMG]

Just make sure that your grip shell was packaged like that.

Cheers
[Moto G Accessories] Germknoedl:
Same here.

I'm having a blue shell-cover from the german/austrian amazon.

I don't like it. The surface is too smooth (compared to the original cover) and one corner doesn't snap into place. Too loose.

Now I'm using the original cover again.:silly:
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
The packaging is exactly the same as that picture.

I have a theory but i really hope it isn't true. Could it be that the newer black shells (standard shells) have a smoother texture? Others have said that the stock black shell and the black grip shell have exactly the same texture so either the grip shells have changed or the stock shell has changed.

I have also watched videos with the reviewer commenting on the white shell and the black shell being the exact same texture too, i have ordered a white shell and a red shell so i will compare the texture (i really hope they are soft touch too). If they are smoother then it is possible that the black shell has changed which would be pretty annoying if i ever need to replace the current one
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
Yeah i have heard others commenting on the blue shell being smoother.

Is it just me or do the clips on the shells wear away pretty quickly? After 3x of removing the shell and clipping it on again it starts getting looser and starts to creak in the bottom corners.

I'm currently awaiting delivery of the red shell and the white shell, i will update my thoughts regarding the texture on here.
[Moto G Accessories] matmutant:
This is simply 1st gen cover (built late 2013) vs 2d gen cover (built at the beginning of 2014)

1st gen covers have a black logo (for black cover) and take fingerprints a lot

2d gen covers have a silver logo and are much smoother :)
[Moto G Accessories] Germknoedl:
[MENTION=374748]fedor[/MENTION]:

My (stock)black shell is still fitting perfect.

The blue one was loose right from the beginning. Quality control before getting packed and shipped? I don't think so.;)

[MENTION=3816475]matmutant[/MENTION]:

Thx for the info.:good:

My blue one has the black Moto-logo and the date 12/14/13 is printed on the inside.

A carbonfiber-cover would be nice!:cowboy:
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
Hm that's strange, the texture does indeed differ between the 2 colours of the M logo (the black grip shell has a black M and the one that came with my phone has a silver M) but the one with the black logo is actually a lot smoother whereas the one with the silver logo has a more textured rubbery soft surface.

I actually received the red shell today and it looks very nice, i thought it might look a little pinkish from some of the reviews and videos but no it's just plain red. One thing that did disappoint me a little is the texture, while it's not as smooth as the grip shell it doesn't have that soft rubbery feeling of my stock black shell i would put it in between the black grip shell with black M and the stock black shell with a silver M in terms of texture. It has a silver M and it's build date is 01/04/14.

Still it's interesting to know that there is a difference in texture between the black shell with a silver M and the one with a black M, i will be sure to request the silver one if i decide to buy another black shell.

Now i just have to wait for the white one to be delivered.
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
How many times have you removed the black shell off of the phone? In my experience it's 3x or so before the bottom corners start creaking when pressed.

A carbon fiber one would indeed be cool but you could always just buy a d brand skin for the back. I'm in the UK and unfortunately it's unavailable here
[Moto G Accessories] Germknoedl:
About 5 times.:cyclops:
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
I may be doing it wrong then lol
[Moto G Accessories] Germknoedl:
I don't think so... That's a quality related problem.
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
But it's been the same with all 3 moto g's i have had, the bottom corners start creaking when pressed. I took it out today and i found the problem, the little very tiny clips at the bottom are very small compared to the new shells i have ordered, they are around half the size and barely visible. I don't know if this is the size it came with or if it's worn away after a few times of removing it and placing it back on.

Also i got my white shell today, looks great but doesn't feel like the black one either. It looks and feels almost like white chalk but it is pretty sticky when holding it compared to the black shell which means it is grippier but feels cheaper too.

I just have to decide whether i care more about the looks or feel.
[Moto G Accessories] Germknoedl:
I examined my blue shell and found the same problem. The bottom-right clip is too short which makes the shell loose in this area.

It was loose right from the beginning. So I guess it came to me like this right out of the factory.

I'll keep my stock-shell on the phone.

Right now I can only order shells with the black logo. :crying:

If I search for "second gen" shells, I'm getting the shells for the newer MOTO G 2.
[Moto G Accessories] matmutant:
No idea, looks like "2d gen" black cover was given with beginning of 2014 built devices, not sure if they sell some alone, on Motorola Website, looks like some covers have a white/silver logo (raspberry, spearmint and chalk?), some don't...

The best is to find a shop where you can touch before buying :confused:
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
Having now tried the black, the red and the white shell i have to say the black one is far superior IMO due to the material, with both the white and the red shell i couldn't wait to take them off and put the black one on as they just feel wayy too cheap. Add that to the fact that they both creak a little but in different areas i have to say I'm dissapointed with the shells.

My stock black one looks like it's developing creaks in new areas for some reason so i might take it off and place some tape under the cover to make it a luttle thicker so it doesn't creak when pressed
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
I think the black one with a silver logo is the only one with the soft touch rubberized texture (it's a shame that it's almost to find) the red shell i have was manufactured in 2014 with a silver M but it doesn't have the same texture as the black one with a silver M
[Moto G Accessories] Germknoedl:
Maybe we'll have to wait until all of the first gen-shells are sold. :eek:
[Moto G Accessories] fedor12:
You could always try and ask the sellers if the shell you will receive is the silver or black logo, all the one's on ebay have a black logo but they are just generic pictures so it is entirely possible that the one's they actually send have the silver logo.

I found one on ebay, it was an auction and the picture was of the actual shell with the silver logo brand new in box so i bid on it and won it for £3 (i was the only one to bid) with shipping it came up to £5 which is the price they are selling on ebay anyway so I'm happy i managed to buy the superior softer feeling shell. The old one was beginning to creak in all places after only a few weeks of ownership.

This one's going good for now, i only put it on today but so far i don't hear any creaks (unlike the coloured shells i purchased)
[Moto G Accessories] marmotilla83:
So... I have a Moto G 4G with a silver logo on the back. I though Grip Shell be as rubber as my original case, but... no? I am thinking to buy this original one http://www.amazon.es/gp/product/B00...liid=I1HCA7SD4HK0TS&ref_=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl but now I am wondering it isn't going to have a rubber plastic back :(
[Moto G Accessories] Chandresh204:
I bought the original Moto Grip shell for Moto G XT1033 and the texture is not the same as that of the back panel. it is not soft touch but plastic tacky. This prevents any kind of dirt/stain from ever coming on it. And i bought it from the official Motorola Seller (flipkart).
[General Questions and Answers] aussiesausage:
Hi guys.

I recently bought a iPhone 6, as popular as these phones are, I cannot find a forum that's active for them, the iPhone developers looks like it's been dead for ages.

Anyone know of a forum for these phones that's active?

I can't find one on xda either?
[General Questions and Answers] Lanoon:
iphone

why iphone is not included in here
[General Questions and Answers] aussiesausage:
I don't know why. I can't find one?
[General Questions and Answers] Pranav1010:
I think because iphone doesn't offer customization so it don't have this kind of forums.

In this forums most of the threads are for customizing you phone though I think xda should have some threads related to iphone where people can solve some issues and can discuss about iphone
[General Questions and Answers] KidCarter93:
There are a few reasons but one of the main reasons is that we've tried it before.

iPhone developers was created as a place for members to discuss iOS and to develop on the platform. As [MENTION=3011723]aussiesausage[/MENTION] mentioned, that site is barely used and that was the problem. The developer interest simply wasn't there so XDA cut all ties.
[General Questions and Answers] thoney:
me too I can't really find any threads about iPhone..:(
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] usarmy2008:
Im having a big headache here, I have windows vista enterprise edition (the release version) and i downloaded Windows Mobile Device Center from microsoft. My problem is when ever I try to connect the device, windows installs HTC usb sync and after that I get another message saying I need to install drivers for a "unknown device" I went to device manager and sure enough somehow this "unknown device" is related to my phone, It askes to look for drivers and can not find any. Anyway, this is somehow creating a problem because I can not connect the phone with WMDC.

Thanks for your help,

Chris
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Ninja1:
Similar problems here with Vista Ultimte RTM. You can also watch here for some answers.

Ninja1
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] KanosWRX:
A couple weeks ago I tried to sync my Cingular 8525 but had no luck, Vista managed to find and install some HTC drivers, but I couldn't get active sync to work (mobile device center now in vista). But I could browse the files on the device. Then just today I went into device manager and manually told it to look for new drivers online, it did, found some, and installed them, then mobile device center started working and I could sync. Wahoo!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] jasjamming:
This just happened to me today after using wmdc on vista business for 2 months. now my device comes up as "uknow device" in the device manager and then a few seconds later I get a popup window telling me that my USB device is unknown.

Damn annoying. im trying to figure out what happened and if i cant, then ill reinstall windows vista. bloody M$ crap.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] ctho24:
when Vista prompt u for installing the driver, you have to manually select the driver location! Select driver directory to the Windows directory... Then Vista will be able to locate and loaded the device driver... i tried it works...

good luck
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] jasjamming:
it was working fine for 2 months so I assume the correct drivers were installed. nonetheless, i will try update the driver for "unknown device" if I can find the inf file in the windows directory.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] jasjamming:
i tried it,

it says that my "Unknown Device" in the USB controllers category has the latest drivers installed.

this is too funny.

not sure what went wrong here.

Ive also uninstalled wmdc and reinstalled it many times and still no luck.

hrrrmmmmm, i feel a format and image coming up soon.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] jasjamming:
OK, i have solved the problem.

who would have thought I had 2 faulty sync-charge cables. They worked on Sunday and stopped working on Monday.

I noticed this happened after I used WM5torage. This is strange.

Anyways, things are back to normal
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Penske MB:
I have been sync with Windows Vista Ultimate both USB and Bluetooth for weeks. Especially the Bluetooth works great both sync and install software!!
[ONE Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] razer_ins:
Possible port JB dialer on KK rom for OPO ?

thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] HiDEFF:
Hi everyone,

I have a Samsung Galaxy S4 with AT&T. I'm on Android 4.2.2 and my phone is rooted. I wanted to update to Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) so I went to SuperSU and selected the unroot option. Everything appears to be unrooted (apps that require root access no longer work and I downloaded an app called Root Checker which confirmed that my phone is no longer rooted). My only concern before I proceed with the update is that, when I power on the phone, it shows the unlocked padlock with the words "Custom" underneath it. With that said, is it safe to proceed with the update?

Thanks in advance.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] jd1639:
Are you on mdb or mdl firmware I would highly recommend you don't update. You have the ability to flash 4.4.2 roms
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] HiDEFF:
MF3 but I just want to update the device.. I should be okay accepting the update, right?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] trekklee:
I also have the same problem i want to unroot so that i can update

I don't know anything about root

I'm looking in about device and i see my base band and my build number both end in MDL

I'm on android 4.2.2

At&t carrier

Thats all i know