yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Acer Iconia A700 and A510] chris1005:
I have problem with my A511 i cant flash any rom it fails everytime with the error could install rom.zip ... exept of pacman and pa which have a binary error (binary couldnt be executed or smth )

tried several recoverys

any suggestions ?

chris
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] waqasahmed939:
Hallo all!

I've rooted my phone, and I believe I installed clockword mod a while back. I can't remember exactly how I did it, so Ill have to find some guides etc... again

Any way, the phone is becoming a little slow, and battery life is becoming a bit of an issue....

And Im looking at putting a custom ROM on it, that is a balance between battery/power, as well as a suitable kernel - if any one has any ideas?

I guess I want to put Android KitKat on to it, and then Android L at a later date (unless Android L is already available for the nexus 4???)
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Planterz:
The ROM won't have much to do with battery life. The kernel has a bit to do with battery life, but the real culprit is all your apps and how you use your phone. As time goes by, you install more apps. More apps means more crap running in the background. More things that need to sync, check for updates, push annoying useless notifications, etc. I won't tell you not to install a custom ROM/kernel (btw, check out HellsCore), but improved performance will be largely placebo.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KennyG123:
XDA is a development site not a support site. As such members are expected to do the research, read through the development threads and decide what is BEST for them. The only results that would be posted here are what each member has found to be BEST for them by experimentation based on their phone/usage/setup/apps/signal strength. Please take the time to read through those development threads to learn all about the software you are about to drastically alter your very expensive device with.

Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you for your cooperation.
[Google Chromecast] Hyflex:
Hi Guys,

I've got a rather unusual setup for my home-internet where by I have a main router (192.168.1.1) which provides Wi-Fi to one part of the house and a second router turned into an access point (192.168.1.1) by running an ethernet cable from router 1 to router 2.

I've connected my Chromecast successfully to the TV near the 192.168.1.1 router but when I try to use it on the TV near the 192.168.1.2 router if it connects to the 192.168.1.1 router it's extremely laggy as it only has 1 bar of signal.

However, if it connects to the 192.168.1.2 router and then use my phone to try to cast to the TV it works nicely; however the TV has no internet access so it can't stream via YouTube... etc as you can see:

I've given the Chromecast a static IP in both routers so that it has the IP of 192.168.1.115, it's rather confusing because the Chromecast shows that it has the right IP as you can see: http://i.imgur.com/7L2RxUj.png and other wireless devices work like my phone does when it's got a static IP connected to the second router.

Here are some side by sides of each router's settings.

WAN Connection Settings: http://i.imgur.com/TtfrgLZ.png

WAN Bridge Connection Settings: http://i.imgur.com/5iEijHk.png

LAN DHCP/Static IP Settings: http://i.imgur.com/YF4V7Mw.png

WLAN Settings: http://i.imgur.com/4k4Pveu.png

ADSL Settings: http://i.imgur.com/ZGDLL0W.png

Routing (RIP) Settings: http://i.imgur.com/WuNWmUQ.png

Firewall Settings: http://i.imgur.com/hSIWSL0.png

NAT Settings: http://i.imgur.com/jFGzmcd.png

IGMP Settings: http://i.imgur.com/bFz5jkr.png

UPnP Settings: http://i.imgur.com/nvsxBjA.png

Power Savings: http://i.imgur.com/fjUz9Tj.png

DLNA Settings: http://i.imgur.com/lQE4hgc.png

Connection Mode: http://i.imgur.com/2181vSs.png

Does anyone know what settings should be changed / are incorrect?

Any help would be much much appreciated!
[Google Chromecast] Hyflex:
I just messed around some more and it's because the Chromecast auto-detects gateway information.... if it detects gateway as 192.168.1.2 it wont work because of something to do with the router...

If the gateway was 192.168.1.1 but connected to the 192.168.1.2 router it would function correctly..

How do I get round this?

Would I have to do something with the below:

DSL Access types:

http://i.imgur.com/5lLoimL.png

http://i.imgur.com/2WT6wY7.png

http://i.imgur.com/F4lESv6.png

http://i.imgur.com/7qvkFiW.png

Ethernet Access types:

http://i.imgur.com/EsjOskJ.png

http://i.imgur.com/op9nF3Y.png

http://i.imgur.com/43Azjo5.png

UMTS Access types:

http://i.imgur.com/BPQg1Oz.png
[Google Chromecast] muchtall:
Where do you have the ethernet connection from router 1 connected into router 2?

If it's connected into the WAN port, the problem probably is that your WAN and LAN network interfaces both have the same subnet, which just plain won't work. Even if it did, your NAT firewall on router 2 would probably interfere with proper communication between your Chromecast and your phone/browser.

If it's connected to your LAN port (which is how I'd suggest connecting them), you shouldn't have DHCP enabled on router 2.

Good luck!
[Google Chromecast] Hyflex:
Hi,

I have the ethernet connected to the LAN1 port on router 2, I've tried connecting it into the fiber port but don't know how to set it up to allow networking via the fibre port.

So your suggestion is to disable DHCP?

It's weird because if I'm connected to Router 2 on my phone I can still control my Samsung TV via the SammyGo app and also my Sky+ Box that are both connected to Router 1.
[Google Chromecast] muchtall:
Yes. My guess is that the DHCP server on the second router is serving up leases with the wrong gateway (.2). Leaving DHCP enabled on router 2 would allow all of your LAN devices to communicate with each other, but any device that gets the .2 gateway lease won't see the internet.

You should only have one DHCP server on a network anyway, unless you know what you're doing and have some sort of redundant server config set up. But in that case you wouldn't be here talking to me ;)
[Google Chromecast] bhiga:
Exactly what muchtall said.

Connect the two routers LAN-LAN, but set the secondary AP's gateway to the first router's LAN address and turn off the secondary AP's DHCP server.

That way everything should get DHCP from the primary AP/router and Internet traffic will route correctly.

Have had to do this many times to get around silly ISP router/modem combos and use my own router.
[Google Chromecast] Hyflex:
I disabled the DHCP on the second router and it did nothing even with devices and routers rebooted, I then tried to set the LAN Host on the second router to .1 even though I was sure it would just cause a conflict and as soon as I did this the entire network became unstable internet was up then down, up then down... over and over.

I had it set like this: http://i.imgur.com/5Zq8fk6.png

Either I'm understanding something wrong or I'm doing something wrong...

I tried the following: http://i.imgur.com/5Zq8fk6.png but as I said to muchtall, it just made the network incredibly unstable because of an ip conflict I guess?

EDIT #1, To both...

Do I need to do something in static routing: http://i.imgur.com/mBUeYFQ.png

EDIT #2

I think I've got it working... I disabled DHCP, kept it on .2 and changed the WAN settings to the following:

http://i.imgur.com/axPP5tv.png

The LAN cable is connected in LAN1 and I'm using SSID1 (it appears to be working on my phone and chromecast atm)
[Google Chromecast] muchtall:
I might be getting lost with what you are trying, so let's just lay out the ground rules of what you must have configured to make a double wireless "router" network work:

Both routers must be connected together via a LAN port on Router 1 to a LAN port on Router 2

Router 1 should be connected via the WAN port to the internet

Router 1 should have an IP address of 192.168.1.1

Router 1 should have DHCP enabled

Router 2 should have an IP address of 192.168.1.2 (or any other free address, just NOT .1)

Router 2 should have DHCP disabled

Router 2 does not need any routes configured (default or otherwise) since it is on the same broadcast segment as Router 1, and Router 1 handles routing for the network.

If you are still having problems, try a few tests when connected to Router 2 with a computer:

Can you ping 192.168.1.1?

Can you ping 8.8.8.8?

Can you open http://google.com?

(Assuming you are on Windows) Post the output of "ipconfig /all" here (which you can run in a "cmd" window).

Once we know the results of those tests, and the network config of your computer connected to Router 2, we might be able to determine what's wrong.

Edit: Glad to hear you got it working. Looks like your router supports WAN/LAN bridging. That's nice. Not all routers do. It also got me to thinking that one of the problems you can encounter when doing and LAN port to LAN port conection is htat hte ports may not support auto-MDIX (auto-crossover). Basically the RX pairs need to connect to the TX pairs on the RJ45 connectors. If your router's built-in hub didn't support it, you would have had to have made an ethernet crossover cable. Anyhow, hope everything works out in your testing. Good luck!
[Google Chromecast] Asphyx:
Maybe I'm wrong here....

But wouldn't it be better to connect the second router using it's WAN port (connected to LAN Port on main router) and then shutting off DHCP and putting the second router into Bridge mode with the same SSID?

Then it should just act as a repeater and would even stop from having interruptions when switching from one router to another?
[Google Chromecast] Hyflex:
Both routers must be connected together via a LAN port on Router 1 to a LAN port on Router 2 Check

Router 1 should be connected via the WAN port to the internet Check

Router 1 should have an IP address of 192.168.1.1 Check

Router 1 should have DHCP enabled Check

Router 2 should have an IP address of 192.168.1.2 (or any other free address, just NOT .1) Check

Router 2 should have DHCP disabled Check

Router 2 does not need any routes configured (default or otherwise) since it is on the same broadcast segment as Router 1, and Router 1 handles routing for the network. Check

I tried this on my third router which is a D-Link DSL-3780; not a Huawei HG533 and when I try to connect my phone to this router it sits there trying to allocate an IP address but sits there trying over and over and constantly failing. I've tried to use the "DHCP Relay" option too but it does seem to solve the issue either.

If I then connect the third router to the computer and set the TCP/IPv4 settings like http://i.imgur.com/n77Gz3R.png then it connects fine, however if I make it obtain automatically like the Chromecast would then it fails to connect.

Pinging the Router

Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
PING: transmit failed. General failure.
PING: transmit failed. General failure.
PING: transmit failed. General failure.
PING: transmit failed. General failure.

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss)

Pinging Google DNS

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
PING: transmit failed. General failure.
PING: transmit failed. General failure.
PING: transmit failed. General failure.
PING: transmit failed. General failure.

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss)

Obviously unable to access google.

Finally ethernet details (I've changed some addresses & ID's so nothing could potentially be done to my PC...)

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Atheros AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 PCI-E Ethernet Controller
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-24-8C-29-A1-00
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::96x0:df12:e3s2:cb39%11(Preferred)
Autoconfiguration IPv4 Address. . : 169.254.202.137(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : fe80::1%11
DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 236180380
DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1B-89-45-44-00-24-9P-48-A1-DB

DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 8.8.8.8
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

That's what I've done for the secondary router, it works now but my third router doesn't have that. Although not as important.
[Google Chromecast] bhiga:
Make sure the second router's LAN gateway is set to the LAN address of the first router (192.168.1.1) otherwise it won't know where to send packets for its wireless clients and everything will end up in going nowhere.
[Google Chromecast] Hyflex:
Hmm, I can't find anywhere to setup a "LAN Gateway", I would of though the DHCP relay would have done the same thing but it doesn't do anything :/

Internet Setup: http://i.imgur.com/KufkUd5.png

Wireless Setup: http://i.imgur.com/Vqj8x2z.png

LAN Setup: http://i.imgur.com/1mm55I5.png

WLAN Performance: http://i.imgur.com/ATGL7dy.png

Virtual Server: http://i.imgur.com/3i6sJBb.png

Applications: http://i.imgur.com/7hkfG2k.png

Filter: http://i.imgur.com/0UXk2F7.png

Advancaed ADSL: http://i.imgur.com/redgNCY.png and http://i.imgur.com/AQHlo1v.png

Firewall: http://i.imgur.com/km0iXeZ.png

DNS: http://i.imgur.com/YfQ90OO.png

IGMP: http://i.imgur.com/PIuDGgR.png

QOS: http://i.imgur.com/7yBo8yE.png

UPnP & DLNA: http://i.imgur.com/bp2XJ5L.png

Samba: http://i.imgur.com/KXNJgLL.png

Static Routing: http://i.imgur.com/HtR73zu.png

RIP: http://i.imgur.com/F2pVJ5v.png
[Google Chromecast] bhiga:
It would if the wireless clients are getting the primary router LAN address as the gateway, as outbound traffic will go there for the router to determine where to send it.

If the wireless clients are getting a different address, then that device needs to know to send the traffic to the primary router.

Wired clients on the secondary router will have the same issue.

But if your secondary router is connected from its WAN port to the primary router's LAN port in Bridge mode as pictured, no gateway needs to be specified because unknown traffic should route "out and up" through the WAN port.
[Google Chromecast] muchtall:
That's not going to be of any use when the routers are connected LAN port to LAN port. DHCP handles that, and since the networks should be on the same broadcast segment, normal ARP discover handles the rest.

[MENTION=3564095]Hyflex[/MENTION]: DHCP Relay isn't going to be applicable either (since both routers should be on the same broadcast domain of the network), and in fact could interfere with proper operation. What is the current state of things? Is your Chromecast working, or no? If it's not working, do your applicable LAN ports show a link when the two routers are connected?

---------- Post added at 06:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:04 PM ----------

That alone would break the Chromecast functionality. The Chromecast has to be on the same subnet as the phone, unseparated by NAT.

---------- Post added at 06:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:11 PM ----------

Nevermind. Missed the bridge part.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] kettir:
I'd like to set all my volumes (ringtone, system, everything) at the same level. In other words, I don't want separate loudness levels for ringtone, notifications, games, anything. I'm not seeing anything I can set in Volume. Is there a setting, or if not, maybe an xposed module that does this? Thanks to anyone who can advise.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] fbarcenas:
Now that Samsung is going the way with HTC and making KNOX mandatory, CM11 development for future Samsung Handsets are surely going to suffer.

Should we be looking at LG or SONY now for open hardware handsets? So what the next most modable and tweakable brand of phones out there?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] jd1639:
See this sticky and ask your question there

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=55240034
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] rebel1699:
Nexus is ALWAYS the most mod-able and tweakable phones, hands down.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] KennyG123:
As mentioned, please refer to the sticky specifically for upgrading and other phone discussion in General

Thanks

FNSM
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] c00ller:
My gf has HTC One with latest stock T-Mobile US ROM, unlocked bootloader, is rooted, and has TWRP. T-Mobile is about to release an OTA (source), and I am wondering how to go about installing it. AFAIK, stock recovery is required, AND the bootloader needs to be locked again. If this is the case, re-rooting will require unlocking the bootloader and thus doing factory reset? Is there a simpler way to do this?
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yatindroid:
Stock recovery and preinstalled apps needed

Bootloader locked not needed

There are many posts written about this read them first
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] clsA:
relock your bootloader

fastboot oem lock

and run this RUU

http://www.htc.com/us/support/htc-one-t-mobile/news/

instructions / Download are at the bottom of the page

Everything on the Phone will be lost ..Backup to your PC and google first !
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] c00ller:
FYI I have actually tried running an RUU on unlocked bootloader with stock recovery, kept failing until I relocked the bootloader...
[TouchPad Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WooShell:
Hey folks,

I have recently replaced my older Evervolv on the Touchpad with a current Milaq Nightly, and for some reason it doesn't mount the internal SDcard partition (worked fine with Evervolv).

When I 'mount -t vfat /dev/mapper/store-media /sdcard' manually, it works fine and I can see the files in there, so the file system apparently is intact, but Android doesn't seem to recognize it as usable SDcard storage (i.e. no "move to SD" option in the app manager etc). The mount doesn't persist across reboots either, and adding an entry to /fstab.tenderloin is equally pointless.

Any hints on what could it be that prevents my device from automounting this partition?
[TouchPad Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] shumash:
It's not simply a matter of flashing the newer datamedia builds over an older, probably non-DM build. It requires restructuring the internal storage of the TP. Explicit directions are here. Use the newer version of the tool.
[TouchPad Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WooShell:
The Evervolv before already was a datamedia build, and I have adjusted the partition sizes accordingly.

It worked correctly after the EW->Milaq migration about two weeks ago, and broke when I flashed a new Nightly over it last weekend.

(I did the whole cleanup via CWM before flashing the new nightly, just to avoid that question.)
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] dew1989:
Is there a good free way to get your games off your wizard and put them onto a freshly flashed wizard. I'm thinking about upgrading to the latest rom but I want all my games still. TIA
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] Menneisyys:
Please do follow my articles, they're ALL posted to the General forum - I've explained this in the Backup Bible ( http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=278037 ).

In a nutshell, for cross-ROM updates, you can only use Sprite Backup's Device Upgrade mode.
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Packito Foreever Kash:
[ROM][LB/UB][4.0.4]][Packito Foreever Kash] XU Style Android L

Rom Android L

Well Here I leave my most recent work is a Rom Based in Android L,

Many say that if based on Nexus, On Samsumg, Etc.

But So Is A Xperia U, As Amended Version Ami liking me android L.

Since there is not an official version of Android to a L, so I hope you like ... ...

PERSONSALISATION and PERFORMANCE

Android Bootanimation L.

SystemUi With time in the Middle ...

SystemUi amended by Notification My Style Curtain Nexus 5

SystemUi style icon Xperia Z2 Battery ...

Preferences SystemUi Serajr 2013

Framework-res had changed to ke Advance Power Menu. (Shutdown, reboot, CWM, Screenshot, Plane Mode)

Framework-res Customised Applications ke let Transparent

Framework-res Updated To Fix Bug of player buttons in the lockscreen ..

Tweaks in the build prop

init.d support xperia

Themes Modified with Android Wallpaper of L

Icons Changed To ke give the appearance of L2 Android Launcher

Xperia Launcher Stock

Xperia Launcher 1.3.7c

systenui.apk & SystemuiPreference.apk By Serajr

installation (vía CWM):

1º wipe data/factory reset > Yes -- delete all user data

2º wipe cache partition > Yes - Wipe Cache

3º advance

4º> wipe dalvik cache > Yes - Wipe Dalvik Cache

9º install zip from sdcard > choose zip from SD > Rom Android L.zip

10º reboot system now

(Optional for a clean installation, follow the order of 1 to 10)

5ºadvance > wipe battery stats > Yes - Wipe Battery Stats

6ºmount and storage > format / system > Yes - Format

7ºmount and storage > format / data > Yes - Format

8ºmount and storage > format / cache > Yes - Format

Link

Mega - http://goo.gl/2Ngl9I

View attachment 2930987 View attachment 2930988

View attachment 2930989 View attachment 2930990

View attachment 2930991 View attachment 2930992

View attachment 2930993 View attachment 2930994​

The SystemUI that I use is to Serajr Version 2013, What Customize to make it like this at the Rom ..

Icons EstiloAndrid L,

The Manual Istale Mind With A MOD

I created especially for the image to Meter Apk

No Need to decompile APK kada,

Campartire soon as the MOD is still in process Afinarle Details ..

The WallPaper And Themes Were Changed With Images downloaded from Google.

any questions or clarifications can make me

know and we will gladly answer them,

this rom is totally my authorship ..
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Packito Foreever Kash:
Thanks

Thanks brother, to which Yours is Better !!!
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] soga07:
Can not download?
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] bharathbondfire:
just copy link & paste in google u will get it in htc...com
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] dasti555:
Is in this rom Z2 Battery look? If yes it will awesome or if someone help me how to import Z2 Battery to this rom thx.

DOWNLOADING.
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Packito Foreever Kash:
already active link...
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Duchman:
I don't see your sources m8
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Bajanman:
Getting Prime Instant Video On your Android Phone

For those of you outside the US you can use a Vpn to access the service..

Download the Amazon App from the play store.

Visit Amazon Instant Video from within the Amazon App by tapping menu icon, and selecting Amazon Instant Video from the menu.

Find what you'd like to watch, and tap Play-you'll be prompted to make a one-time install of the Prime Instant Video player to enable playback.

Tap Open after installing the Prime Instant Video player and then tap Play.

Two great ways to watch

Prime Instant Video: Amazon Prime members get unlimited access to stream 40,000 movies and TV episodes at no additional cost. If you're not an Amazon prime member, You may be eligible for a 30-Day Free Trial.

Click here to start your free month.

I've added both apps needed to get this working below.

For those that can't download from the play store.

Amazon App

Amazon Instant Video App
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] AnTerNoZ:
Users in Germany can use this to without VPN .... Just get yesterday the update from play store for the Amazon app and than loaded the player from it... ?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Bajanman:
Cool to here y'all getting it to!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
thanks man, works perfectly! :good::good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Bajanman:
Your welcome buddy nice seeing you skimming thru the threads.[emoji106]
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
yeah, I am tempted to get a note 4, so I have been cruising some of the note forums lately..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Bajanman:
Haha lol[emoji106] I'm heading that direction!

Don't go overt the the note 4 forums, lot of confusion/complaining in there. But none of them have to phone, so how do they know anything. You grey what I'm saying. Just to much speculation over there...