yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Android Development] TheWilkieWay:
If anyone is getting BBS showing something keeping their phone awake but there are very little wakelocks actually shown, try making sure you're on the latest Super SU beta (v2.44) as I believe chainfire made some changes down the line for CM12, I was previously on the stable version (v2.40). It worked for me so I thought I might as well share, thought I remembered some users mentioning some rouge wakelocks at some point. I've attached the wakelock I spotted in Wakelock Detector.
[ONE Android Development] katinatez:
I updated my device sources and now I cant get to boot, have to revert my commits on device, and start over. Will work on bringing 2.8.4.0 tonight or tomorrow.
[ONE Android Development] mak725:
If they work in V4.7
[ONE Android Development] gnan10:
Omg these screen animations in temasek spareparts are BEAUTIFUL..???
[ONE Android Development] diopskill:
Will we be able to convert to f2fs/ext4 etc thru this new twrp?
[ONE Android Development] Zekene:
Whats the speed dailer bug? The dailer in lockscreen?
[ONE Android Development] katinatez:
You could read op, & continue conversation here.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2981495
[ONE Android Development] fjsferreira:
No. If you go to the dialer app, contacts are invisible.

Someone could try to copy the dialer.apk from other ROM and try it or even from 4.7, but I doubt this will work...
[ONE Android Development] nicholaschum:
Actually. Dialer.apk is not dependent on anything. You can just port it over.
[ONE Android Development] molonad:
Hi just some warning about new version of boeffla beta3,dont flash it on this rom, you will get bootloop ?

---------- Post added at 06:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:28 PM ----------

just for now :) i think on next update everything would be fine :-O.
[ONE Android Development] Genericxx:
Running Temasek 5.0 with Boeffla Beta 3 without any issues
[ONE Android Development] molonad:
ok i will try again and report back , some people on boeffla have this issue too

---------- Post added at 06:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:50 PM ----------

i tried again but again bootloop , and iam not alone :( i will wait for next rom or boeffla update
[ONE Android Development] Genericxx:
See this Post at official Boeffla Thread.
[ONE Android Development] jasonsaw96:
still getting signal drops

i have flashed the modem given but no luck...any idea? my screen on time is less than 2 hours though...its draining my battery
[ONE Android Development] molonad:
tried didnt help i left feetback
[ONE Android Development] black.ic3:
What do you recommend? Linaro or Sabermod? What is the best for this rom in stability and performance?
[ONE Android Development] mak725:
V4.7 Sabermod
[ONE Android Development] :
V4.7 Sabermod

---------------

Admin Note: this thread has a dedicated questions and answers section which you can access here -->.[/quote]

try both its personal :)
[ONE Android Development] chenrp:
I have 4.9 and i have a bug. When i receive a call and it ends, i still see the except or reject option even when the call has already ended.
[ONE Android Development] Nagasaky2x:
Anyone noticing WiFi slowdown on 5.0 Sabermod? Although I get over 20Mb/s on Speedtest it's like slower than before, taking more time to start the transfer.
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
Honestly, I mean this with utmost respect to all devs involved with Sabermod, but I noticed all sorts of slowdown with it. I thought it was just me at first, but everything from the UI to transitions seemed to be slower and laggier than the standard Linaro version for me.
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
I'd go with linaro, and don't go flashing any external kernels. Stock temasek has proven to be far, far more stable than ak or boeffla. EDIT: This is just my experience, I guess to clarify I meant to say it's proven to be far more stable for me. Feel free to make your own decision.
[ONE Android Development] nadavar:
I'm experiencing the same. I get better experience with the linaro version.
[ONE Android Development] godzulu:
try both its personal :)[/QUOTE]

Same here - V4.7 Sabermod awesome!
[ONE Android Development] nicholaschum:
It's Wednesday and I have nothing to do....

Is anyone running 5.0 or the speed dial thing bothering everyone so much to not update?

Can I expect a 5.1 today or should I theme 5.0... >.< (This is not an ETA, more like, thinking ahead for theming :))
[ONE Android Development] truth77:
the reason why the saber mod feels slower to you then linaro version is because Linaro toolchain produces a smother effect than saber mod. so if you've immediately flashed one and then flashing the other you're going to notice a difference. if you never use Linaro and only use saber mod it wouldn't be that bad. That's why I personally have been waiting for this ROM built with Linaro. other than that I would suggest maybe clean flash or disabling scrolling cache A's or changing animation speed.
[ONE Android Development] pratikp16:
Finally decided to update from Mahdi and it's been pretty smooth so far. Just have a couple of things i'm wondering about. firstly, does the ROM have the option to allow arrow keys in the navbar that control the cursor, can't find it so far?

Finally, is the Guardian news app crashing for anyone else? Tried uninstalling and also clearing data but it just crashes on startup and was just wondering if this was happening for anyone else as i have nothing to compare it to.
[ONE Android Development] Nagasaky2x:
I'm having some problems with link bubble it crashes sometimes on 5.0 for me but otherwise it's working great.
[ONE Android Development] katinatez:
I would wait v5.1 was going to come out with speed dial fixed. Temasek ran into a problem speed dial bug still there,probably will be fix soon.
[ONE Android Development] orangerot.:
Where do you see any instabilities with boeffla? It's perfectly stable without any issues. Also its whole development is based on a close-to-stock philosophy to avoid issues. And in my opinion it's worth to use it (in terms of performance, battery life and stability).

PS: I don't want to do any advertising, I'd just like to know how you came to that conclusion.

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] nicholaschum:
Okay alright! I'll have an exception for the OPO branch this week for the theme.
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
"It's perfectly stable without any issues".

I've heard that many times about ak and boeffla, but I also know that random reboots and lag has plagued both, and I've experienced it personally on both. Not once have I had an issue on temasek on the stock kernel, and honestly, there's a ridiculous "no stock" mentality that a lot of "crack flashers" adopt where the moment they flash a ROM they simply must flash a custom kernel otherwise they're somehow "missing out". All due respect to ak, but the stock kernel isn't "terrible" by any means. You shouldn't feel like you're missing out and apart from plumping up Antutu scores, I haven't really found any noticeable performance or battery differences on either.

If you want to genuinely use and enjoy your phone, well, the less you try to squeeze out of it the better your long term experience will be. I have been on Temasek now since 2.8 and the moment I stopped trying to immediately flash ak was the moment I started to really enjoy and depend on the ROM. I wasn't clean flashing every day or troubleshooting random reboots.

You should try stock before jumping to custom kernels. Back on the Nexus 5 I used to use custom kernels because the default kernel of my ROM of choice never had DT2W, but now all ROMs have this feature on this phone.
[ONE Android Development] orangerot.:
I'm using the Rom since the very beginning and never clean flashed. Also I never ever had any random reboot not lags with a custom kernel. I'd say in 99% lags or reboots are happening are the users fault. (setting wrong values etc) if a reboot is caused by the kernel and its reported in a proper way (with logs) it gets fixed.

And I don't care about benchmarks, they're quiet unless. But I care about the real use of something. If you flash a custom kernel, and you know what you're doing you'll definitely can get a better performance/battery life and tune everything for your personal needs.

So in my opinion its wrong to curse custom kernels in such a general way. If the user doesn't know about the tunables etc it might be better to stick with stock or don't change any values in the custom kernel, as it might cause random reboots/lags(but what's the point in using a custom kernel then?)

Also I never said, that the stock kernel is bad. It's just wrong to say stock is better than custom, cause that's not true.

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
You can't just say 99% as though it's fact. That's your experience. My experience says otherwise, and you were asking about my experience. They're not comparable, but I can assure you, seeing as I don't "configure" kernels after flashing them, that it was not user error.

In theory, my friend. In theory. What is "performance" to you? Is it UI framerate? Is it how long it takes to get from one app to another? Is it "loading time"? I've seen people convinced that a ROM is much "faster" than another ROM entirely because they sped up the animations in Dev options to .25x or even less. These are ridiculously powerful processors we are talking about. I highly doubt that most kernel enhancements are actually giving end users noticeable performance results. Perhaps different CPU govs might be useful to improve the UI framerate and scrolling performance, but apart from that? I don't know how much I believe people when they say they're getting "better performance". These aren't OEM-skinned pieces of bloated garbage. The OPO is essentially a Nexus.

Battery life, I can admit, is something that can be tweaked by custom kernels. But I think people think they know more than they really do here; the ones that underclock and undervolt just to squeeze a bit more out of their devices are usually this category.

I didn't "curse" custom kernels. I explained my experience, as you asked me about what my experience has been. That includes my opinion. I mean this with respect, but I could not care even slightly less than I already do about whether or not you think I'm "wrong" or why you're "right". Several times when trying both the popular custom kernels, I have had random reboots. I decided I was done with spending more time watching my splash screen than I was using my phone. For people who are seeking stability, I can vouch for the stability of the stock kernel. I will continue to recommend people use the stock kernel and you are welcome to continue to recommend whatever xyz kernel you prefer. Isn't that a great thing that we can have our own experiences?

This is getting stupid. Not once did I say that you shouldn't use stock kernel. You asked me why I feel the way I do and I cited my experience. You're getting rather defensive about this and I'm really not interested in continuing this.

Cheers.
[ONE Android Development] Mrj0to:
Totally agree
[ONE Android Development] orangerot.:
It is really getting stupid. You said it's proven that stock is more stable, but there is no prove. It has the same level of stability if nothing is changed excessively.

Also tweaking your battery with the kernel is not only changing the clock, but also messing with the governor/hotplug parameters.

But, well, everyone should use what he/she wants.

I'm out.

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
Wow, okay. Just for you, since you had issues understanding what I was saying, I went back and edited my post to make it clear that I was just saying it for me. Hopefully that's satisfactory for you (and now I really am done with this pointless tangent).
[ONE Android Development] orangerot.:
Sorry if I somehow offended you, but if somebody says proven it sounds like there are tests or whatever which actually prove that something is good/bad. In this case it was confusing as I understood it as a fact you made, without any proofs. I totally accept that you have your own opinion about that topic (and your edited post is much better to understand now). Sorry to start that discussion, I might have understood your post wrong.

Although I still don't understand where those reboots came from ^^

And just a tip (not to be meant offensive), if you ever decide to come back to custom kernels and such a thing happens to you, grab the log file and post it in the kernel thread. I'm pretty sure the error will be sorted out.

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
If anyone is looking for an alternative to lockscreen notifications, the ever-popular AcDisplay recently updated with full support for L, including material design.

Set it as a "lockscreen" in the settings and it works well. Heads up though, it might get a bit wonky if you use a pin/pattern.

http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/01/14/acdisplay-3-0-rolling-lollipop-support-material-influences/
[ONE Android Development] niko2931:
As I've understood the Sabermod toolchain is a more up to date version of Linaro, is this true?

Or are there more to it than that? If there are what?

Oh and i read the post on this thread saying Linaro has more smoother animations is this true?
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
I won't pretend to know exactly what Sabermod is, but I can at least confirm that after several trials, I've noticed transitions and animations are laggier with the sabermod build (this is all stock kernel of course, and out of the box with no extra modifications). A few more people have confirmed this.

"Performance" wise I don't think there's a difference. I stopped using the Sabermod build simply because I liked smoother transitions and I didn't really benefit from SM optimizations in any way that I could notice. The Linaro build has been wonderfully smooth for me., and I would recommend it over the SM at this point.
[ONE Android Development] Criton30:
linaro v5 build has the same issue with speed dialer?
[ONE Android Development] dickenam:
yerp, Temasek currently working on it. Hopefully soon, only thing keeping me on 4.7 SM :good:
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
As far as I know, the toolchain doesn't have anything to do with the speed dialer issue.
[ONE Android Development] Criton30:
I read and see that linaro is little smoother then sabermod, I would test it, but the speed dialer issue is still there, then I will wait.

As I see on [MENTION=2332422]temasek[/MENTION] twitter page, v5.1 has the speed dialer issue too..... :(

Which is the latest stable (no speed dialer issue) linaro version? 4.7?
[ONE Android Development] orangerot.:
Check the second post, there's a link which explains the differences.

Sabermod is not a more up to date version of Linaro. They're two different things. Sabermod is closer to Googles toolchain, while Linaro has more changes. Everything you need to know is here (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MvSvXWTXCSGiHUzYJv-bWGwH2-zDWC8H87Y_a8s5nTE/mobilebasic?pli=1)

In my opinion Linaro is a bit smoother. (had some lags with Sabermod which are gone on Linaro)

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] niko2931:
I did read that.. I guess i misunderstood it.. Well sorry all for my stupid question/noob question..
[ONE Android Development] vpxf:
My post was clearly lost in conversation. Could someone, or the dev please address my post so I know whether or not to expect resolution or changes?

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=58166740&postcount=5393

Thank you.
[ONE Android Development] dickenam:
Only one I can address is Imgur, works great for me.

Sent from my A0001
[ONE Android Development] CrashTestDroid:
recent commits on github show progress on an expandable volume panel.
[ONE Android Development] vpxf:
Really? Mine crashes on every swipe. The mobile website works fine but not the app.
[ONE Android Development] dickenam:
Yea man, I saw your post this AM I think. I looked at it for a bit then and 0% problems. Sorry for not letting you know then.

Sent from my A0001
[ONE Android Development] gyggyty:
Does anyone else get occasional split second buzzing noise when playing music? Is this issue related to this ROM or Android 5.0 in general. Any solutions?
[ONE Android Development] LiquidSolstice:
Yes, it should. Blame Google. CM/other developers are trying to uncluster!@#$ the mess that they turned the volume settings into.

Sorry, can't replicate.

They way those apps call the quick-settings page is probably only meant for KitKat and below right now. I would wait for your apps to update. Also, for your second point, swipe down from the right side of the status bar to go directly to the quick tiles. When you swipe up, everything slides back up again (notifs and quick settings)

Imgur is working okay for me? Is there something specific in the app where you can't get it running?
[ONE Android Development] vpxf:
The official Imgur app seems to crash at every swipe after picking an image from the gallery. Perhaps I'm just unfortunate. I've done everything I could think of. Fix permissions, uninstall, clear cache.

As far as the background data issue, I'm using Tasker and Secure Settings to manage those. Could be an issue with most likely, Secure Settings. Sorry, that was my mistake.

Swiping down from the right side is a temporary solution for the quick tiles but I enjoy the swipe up from anywhere on my home screen so I don't have to reach up to the top of my phone. Suppose I'll have to wait for the apps to update for that one. Also, swiping up from the right doesn't make it collapse all; swiping up from the bottom does (just discovered this).

I'm glad to hear something is being done about the volume controls :)

Thank you for your time.
[ONE Android Development] mammenj:
Yes, it's an age old issue in lp for bacon.
[ONE Android Development] kaibosh99:
I am one of many people sitting on the newest Mahdi and waiting for the right Lollipop build to jump onto. Having run various forms of Slimkat on my Note 2, a Temasek variation sounds like a good way to go. I haven't read through every page of this thread but it looks like I should wait for the 5.1 release. Time to bust out Titanium Backup for my seven million games I guess...
[ONE Android Development] jasonsaw96:
frequent signal drop

did anyone still having signal drop issue frequently after flashing alpha modem or cm12 nightly? its still the same for me and it drains my battery...please help....
[ONE Android Development] raja_mastana:
I tried this, but did not work for me.

Deleted old dialer.apk

Added apk from 4.7 sm

set permission to rw-r-r

clear cache and dalvik
[ONE Android Development] phierce:
Yup wait for 5.1 as i am on 4.7 which is smooth and stable
[ONE Android Development] Brouss:
I tried also. Used temasek sm-4.7 for the dialer apk. No change in invisible speed dial.
[ONE Android Development] gyggyty:
Is there a fix for it?
[ONE Android Development] reyradi:
Problems

i cannot flash 5.0 SM build , it freeze my recovery. im on TWRP updated 2.8.3.0 by katinatez.

any help?

Edit: flash fhilz touch 6.59 and flash ok...
[ONE Android Development] phermey:
it is all of the above. it is how long does it take to go from stand-by to lockscreen? how long to unlock? how long to load/reload an app from the time i touch the screen, to the time i can focus in and get something done? how long does it take for the keyboard to load? all of these things come into play...and more. i am one of those that sees each and every hiccup, every touch latency issue, every single thing. the stock/franco/other battery saving kernels just don't do it for me.
[ONE Android Development] pgarza:
Has anyone tried both AK and boeffla kernels? Which offers better battery saving/sot?
[ONE Android Development] raycaster3:
If you want my (or anyone else's) personal opinion, maybe via pm would be more appropriate... Otherwise it's all usage dependent. For me, it may be ak, for you boeffla... You know? I've used both and had a positive with both of them. Both devs known what they're doing, and approach things slightly differently, but you really can't know for sure for your device until you run both for an extended period of time.
[ONE Android Development] chenrp:
Any one?
[ONE Android Development] pgarza:
thanks thats what i was looking for... il try both out!
[ONE Android Development] Criton30:
as I see temasek work on v5.2, but no news about the speed dial issue.... somebody has a new info?
[ONE Android Development] expiredd:
IMO we should wait for new release and stop spamming the same bug reports over and over. Wait for next build and read what [MENTION=2332422]temasek[/MENTION] and [MENTION=3814731]katinatez[/MENTION] have to say.

Personally, I'm still on 4.7 SM. I read this post all the days, and I'm just here happy sitting for a new release. However I'm not spamming the same bug report other users have already reported multiple time. Devs are aware and will fix them release by release. However if you prefer to flash every version that comes out, please read this topic and be aware of reported bugs and fixes.
[ONE Android Development] chenrp:
three bugs found:

1.speed dial.

2.I have 4.9 and i have a bug. When i receive a call and it ends, i still see the except or reject option even when the call has already ended.

3.proximity sensor is not working in a call. i can't get the phone end in the middle of the call.
[ONE Android Development] tobitege:
Please read post #2 - General Tips for 3). Speed dial is known and fix in the works.
[ONE Android Development] katinatez:
v5.2 coming in 7 hours going to sleep.
[ONE Android Development] slave2007:
Good Morning,

I have another noob question... I always loose auto-sync data enabled in setting/account. It is simply not permanently activated, what I have to do?
[ONE Android Development] expiredd:
I guess it's time for a clean flash :D
[ONE Android Development] chenrp:
link for zip file not working.

anyone has a link for the latest cm12 modem that will fix the proximity issue?
[ONE Android Development] Neo3000x:
My LTE/3G connection often goes into "connection loop" where it tries to connect, but never gets a connection - I have to reboot the phone for it to work.

I have two OPO's and both does this.

Do I need to flash some other radio or something?

Please advise, thank you in advance :)
[ONE Android Development] tobitege:
These should work: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=19647
[ONE Android Development] fjsferreira:
Does the same here, but I've noticed it happens only when I'm in the local supermarket... I think it's just specific cell towers that do that. And it happened with cm11 also, and with different radios. :(
[ONE Android Development] bundysoat:
I get a bootloop with Boeffla kernel beta 3....not understand...

Enviado desde mi OnePlus One.
[ONE Android Development] tobitege:
Try Beta 2 then.
[ONE Android Development] bundysoat:
Yap, but beta 3 in theory is little more "stable". In the download say that continuously experimental instead of highly experimental. I wait to 5.2. I try install boeffla to try solve the crash on locked screen.

Enviado desde mi OnePlus One.
[ONE Android Development] NikoZBK:
Beta 3 only works with ROMs built on or after 1/14. Use beta 2 until v5.2 is out
[ONE Android Development] bundysoat:
Thanks!

Enviado desde mi OnePlus One.
[ONE Android Development] Neo3000x:
Well it's only happening to me on CM12, comes and goes, usually when I leave a WiFi area where I've been for a while and it tries to connect to LTE.
[ONE Android Development] NewKindOfWorld:
I'm on 4.9 SM, just noticed in OP that now PA Gapps are recommended, can I just dirty flash PA Gapps over old Slim Gapps ? Issues to expect ?

Thanks for the great work !
[ONE Android Development] dragoi90:
[MENTION=5063315]NewKindOfWorld[/MENTION] read the OP second post!

Sent from K't'inga Battlecruiser!
[ONE Android Development] NewKindOfWorld:
Thanks for pointing out that I'm so dumb :D

Cheers
[ONE Android Development] dragoi90:
[MENTION=5063315]NewKindOfWorld[/MENTION] no worries man!We all have been there!

Sent from K't'inga Battlecruiser!