yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Lodix:
28mobile.com confirmed to me that the model they are selling use 800/850/900/1800/2100/2600 for LTE, like if it was a international model.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] hung2900:
Actually Mali T6xx showed a very bad result in fill rate, results in bad performance in high-res. In 1080p it's almost the same as Adreno 330, but much slower on 1440/1600p. However, the new Galaxy Alpha with Mali-628T shows a noticable better on-screen result than Adreno 330 in Z3c (in fact nearly equal to iPhone 6, haha)
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Andrewtst:
Note 4 editions:

- I found from China forum.

SM-N9100(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[China]------{SIM1:TDD-LTE+FDD-LTE+WCDMA+TD-SCDMA+GSM;SIM2:GSM}

SM-N9106V(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[China Unicom]------{TDD-LTE+FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N9106W(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[China Unicom]------{TDD-LTE+FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM;SIM2:GSM}

SM-N9108V(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[China Mobile]------{TDD-LTE+TD-SCDMA+GSM;Roaming:FDD-LTE+WCDMA}

SM-N9108W(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[China Mobile]------{SIM1:TDD-LTE+TD-SCDMA+GSM;SIM2:GSM;Roaming:FDD-LTE+WCDMA}

SM-N9109V(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[China Telecom]------{TDD-LTE+FDD-LTE+CDMA;Roaming:WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N9109W(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[China Telecom]------{SIM1:TDD-LTE+FDD-LTE+CDMA;SIM2:GSM;Roaming:WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910A(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[USA AT&T]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910C(Samsung Exynos 5433)------[Asia-Pacific]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910CQ(Samsung Exynos 5433)------[unknown]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SCL24(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[Japan AU]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+CDMA+GSM}

SC-01G(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[Japan Docomo]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910F(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[Europe]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910FD(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[United Arab Emirates]------{SIM1:FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM;SIM2:GSM}

SM-N910FQ(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[Turkey]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910G(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[Google Play Edition]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910H(Samsung Exynos 5433)------[unknown]------{WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910K(Samsung Exynos 5433)------[Korea KT+]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910L(Samsung Exynos 5433)------[Korea LG+]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910M(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[South America]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910MD(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[Brazil]------{SIM1:FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM;SIM2:GSM}

SM-N910P(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[USA Sprint]------{TDD-LTE+FDD-LTE+WCDMA+CDMA+GSM}

SM-N910R4(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[USA US.Cellular]------{FDD-LTE+CDMA}

SM-N910S(Samsung Exynos 5433)------[Korea SKT]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910T(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[USA T-Mobile]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910T1(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[USA T-Mobile]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910U(Samsung Exynos 5433)------[HongKong,Taiwan,Australia,New Zealand]------{TDD-LTE+FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910V(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[USA Verizon]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+CDMA+GSM}

SM-N910W8(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[North America]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}

SM-N910X(Qualcomm Snapdragon 805)------[Demo Test]------{FDD-LTE+WCDMA+GSM}
[Galaxy Note 4 General] tvlerizle:
xxx

really very nice comments.Illuminated me
[Galaxy Note 4 General] :
I'm sorry but that is clearly incorrect as the GS4 still suffers from some bugs on AOSP and prob will never have a fully working CM, even while having devs working on it for 2 years. Snapdragon was and will be more dev friendly than Exynos.(just bc Samsung doesn't really care about development on their phones)

for your other comment - I won't go to say it's incorrect, however thousands of people flash ROMS - and on every forum on XDA you can see that. saying that nobody cares about ROMS is completely ignorant.

On a personal note I never understood the people that choose to have only one option, instead of choosing the option to have more option available later on.

If this case will be the same as the S4, there is no reason it won't - most devs will get the snapdragon edition(either by preference or just by plain location) and the people that do care about flashing AOSP or other ROMS will most likely would like to chose the snapdragon version.

as I said- it's the same phone, but one will provide you the option to have other option available later on. everyone can choose whichever they like. As I said from past experience- I'm going for the snapdragon one.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] arjun90:
Android is indestructible. :p
[Galaxy Note 4 General] iba21:
It's a completely different os..

and it's unlogic to compare those os.. with android you can do ALL..

With ios.. all what apple permit you to do.. stop
[Galaxy Note 4 General] gekkehenkie11:
Good points. And indeed, those are valid reasons why you need way less RAM on ios. Somebody said before "Note 4 is so much better cause it has 3 Gb ram and the iphone 6 only has 1 gb'. But people forget (or dont even know) about the points you just laid out, which explain why Iphone needs way less RAM.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] arjun90:
So True. You need a brain to understand how to utilize Android. :D The same applies to Windows when we compare Windows to Apple's Mac OS X.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] AndroidAP123:
Questions

Just ordered the SM-N910C from Handtec. Just have a few quick questions:

1) How is the battery life with the exynos compared to the snapdragon? I heard the 20nm fabrication and the new architecture should make it more efficient but apparently the 3G/4G modems consume more power and are not intergrated like Qualcomm SoC's (Correct me if i'm wrong) .

2) Will there ever be official support for Gear VR on SM-N910C

Thanks.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] JNetwork:
1. Dont think the Snapdragon 805 SoC have integrated modem either but it's paired with modems from Qualcomm whereas Exynos use Intel, Ericsson and Samsung modems

2. Also want to know this, could maybe come with Lollipop update eventually?
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Fuzzi99:
The VR compatibility for Exynos models is the AOA1 update which most recieved jan 21st

Sent from my fabulous Note 4 Exynos
[Galaxy Note 4 General] AndroidAP123:
The phone arrived on Tuesday. Loving it so far:D. Installing the software updates as we speak.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] midreestaj:
Below article states that Exynos 5433 has been re-badged as Exynos 7410 - is it true? are they the same soc or different?

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/01/13/the-big-samsung-galaxy-s6-question.aspx
[Galaxy Note 4 General] jvtrigo:
Exynos 5433 and 7410 are the same.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] AndreiLux:
They're not.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] jvtrigo:
Wiki
[Galaxy Note 4 General] AndreiLux:
Now take a good guess who edited that entry in the Wiki.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] jvtrigo:
AndreiLux

Would you mind share what is the difference?

BR,

JVT
[Galaxy Note 4 General] midreestaj:
AndreiLux you were making a document on Exynos soc where is it still not out yet?
[Galaxy Note 4 General] aydink_1903:
Wiki is not a trusted source. But

According to Samsung soc labelling, third number of soc is ARM'S variant number.

5433 has "variant 1 part 3335 revision 0", therefore 7410 seems good calling.

Best regards
[Galaxy Note 4 General] AndreiLux:
It looks that it's going to be published Monday.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] tmac31:
Yes but probably stay 32bit

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1815503
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Sn0blikat:
I still don't get how Exynos cores get theyr numbers. Someone throwing dices?
[Galaxy Note 4 General] more2come:
After spending some time with both versions of the device, my conclusion is quite clear. The Exynos variant of the Note 4 performs way more efficient than the Snapdragon. In day to day usage, it packs more punch than the Qualcomm counterpart and just flies through the bloated TW-Interface, the Snapdragon already struggles there. It's worth mentioning that the Snapdragon is not to blame here, it all comes down to poor optimisation from Samsung. Nevertheless, the Exynos SoC handles the bloated UI quite well and delivers a satisfying experience.

Gaming in 2K brings the Qualcomm SoC to its' limits, I experienced some weird hiccups during gameplay as well, frametime is not smooth at all. Again, here is where the Exynos/Mali Combo absolutely shines. Smooth framerates, even at highest settings.

The efficency per clock cycle of the Exynos CPU is impressive. Thanks to lower clock speeds and smaller manufacturing process (equals lower power consumption), the SoC produces way less heat compared to its Qualcomm counterpart. I did alot of testing, the N910C did never throttle on me, whereas the Snapdragon heated up quickly and throttled quite frequently. Again, Samsung should have thought about a better heat absorption solution for the international version.

The Exynos SoC is a wonderful 64 Bit allround-performer, the only downside is the poor hardware documentation.

The Snapdragon 805 is a solid high-end SoC, but tries a little too hard to lead the field. But the hardware documentation provided by Qualcomm is still a big win here.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] AndroidAP123:
I agree, after playing with the Snapdragon version in the UK and and also using snapdragon version in Best Buy when I went to the US I noticed the UI was not as fluid at is could have been and was dissapointed. After doing significant research into both versions I decided to pull the trigger on the Exynos version hoping that the lag/microstutter would be much less noticeable. I knew I was giving up developer support by going for the international version but I have not looked back ever since. The UI is noticeably more fluid than what I experienced with the snapdragon versions and I am very happy with my purchase. The one thing I am concerned about is battery life on the exynos version, I have heard stories about people getting 6-7 hrs SoT on snapdragon while I an struggling to get 3-4.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] POLO_i780:
The battery life between Snapdragon and Exynos is interesting, at a local SA Forum most of us have the N910F (Snapdragon) and a few have the N910H (3G only Exynos) and N910C (LTE Exynos). Every single N910F user is reporting incredible batt life, we are all getting between 6-7hours SOT easily without even trying, yet the few Exynos users are boggled by this, one of the most frequent contributors with a N910C is not even impressed with his Note 4 batt. life vs his Note 3 Snapdragon, he says they are about the same, yet the N910F owners who came from Note 3s are experiencing quite a decent jump in batt life.

Is the modem in the Exynos really so power hungry?
[Galaxy Note 4 General] tmac31:
All snapdragons are same and generally local option for that country. So they are same. And passed local tests by samsung and network providers.

Exynos users on us and europe mostly has imported devices. Didnt pass any test for that country. So people can report different scenarios it can differ by local operators cuz they use different 4g frequencies. If exynos isnt what samsung offering in your counrty its not guaranteed it will work properly.

You cant just say exynos has power hungry modem cuz 910c has cat4 ericcson modem 910u has cat6 intel modem , 910s has samsung cat6 modem all are different and all for different places. 910u and 910c doesnt support same country.

I was using s800 note 3 and was getting 5-6 hours sot and its been 4 months since im using 910c note 4 im always getting 6-7 hours sot and 48 hours standby(pedometer always active too) . Its stock and i dont even close my recent used apps and im always on mobile network even at home. Its definetly better than my other phone iphone 6 plus too.

Exynos battery life can be differ more than snapdragon devices cuz there is alot of exynos variant too. Im not saying this better than that but battery life comparision is worthless. I can get 6 hours sot with my s3 with 3000mah battery too.it was definetly better than my s800 note 3 always
[Galaxy Note 4 General] POLO_i780:
Here in South Africa Vodacom (Vodafone ZA), sells the N910F, MTN and Cell C sell the N910C, and Telkom Mobile sell the N910H, so none of the units I am talking about are 'untested' down here, ICASA and the networks tested and are selling the units that best fit their frequencies here.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] tmac31:
Hmm thats another story then and a unique situation.it can be about provider too. In my country signal strenght can be changed alot by provider and it effects battery alot. But if some1 getting 6-7 and another get 2-3 there must be a problem with it. Cuz im mostly using my phone for browsing if im doing something on my phone im generally using network and its mobile network mostly. Problem cant be just a power hungry modem for other people there must be a software problem in somewhere. This just need proper testing in same usage.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] shinasurada:
http://xdaforums.com/note-4/general/explanation-horrible-note-4-battery-t3004274

This is why the battery on the n910c sucks. The WiFi not the cellular radio.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] tmac31:
Nope im getting even better battery with wifi like this thatw why i never said i can even get more than 7 hours cuz i generally dont use my phone with wifi.

And its been 4 months with note 4 this isnt just my 1 time stats. Im getting this stats constantly everyday.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] sPEADy:
Battery is extremely good on SD international version have a look at this.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] SeCKToR:
Battery is great on my 910C too.

P.S.: Stock ROM.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] lktakimoto:
Seriously do you think the Note 4 Snapdragon 805 better? Please bow down to the king! N910C Exynos is the best of all! :)
[Galaxy Note 4 General] sPEADy:
I don't want to discuss this further you have used your phone for some 31 hours, I used mine almost about 48 hours you can guess what screen on time I would had with the usage on 31 hours. Have fun.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] exclass:
Yeah stock battery *cough*. Stock rom/kernel *cough* *cough*.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] POLO_i780:
My N910F a few weeks ago

10h16m SOT with 21% battery still left, no Root, no mods. A day of checking emails, watching series, web browsing, playing music via BT in my car, playing music via headphones etc... Thanks to the power cuts down here.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] hashcheck:
This reminds me of Intel vs AMD or Nvidia vs Amd
[Galaxy Note 4 General] exclass:
Very interesting. Some posts before you said you could achieve 6 to 7 hours of screen on time. Now you come up with ''no mods'' with 10 hours 16 min screen on time and still having 21% battery left. People are so pathetic. Bragging online to random strangers about something that's not even true. Not to mention 12 hours non stop with the phone. Just wow.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] shinasurada:
May I ask which country's ROM you are running?
[Galaxy Note 4 General] michelino159:
Super my friend and which country's ROM you are running? I have BTU rom and 8 h sot.

Thanks!
[Galaxy Note 4 General] POLO_i780:
I always say I get on average 6-7hours, even in the batt thread, as DAILY thats what I get, do you understand what AVERAGE is? and said that I got the above a few weeks ago mainly due to watching series, we are having major power cuts down here in SA so my phone and iPad get heavy usage, some people are so pathetic as they simply can't read. I don't have any mods, if you don't like the above results just say so, don't come here with insults due to the fact that you don't understand.

I'm using the German unbranded ROM, I think its DTB or something along those lines? I used BTU and also got great batt life, I went to German as it got the NK4 update 1st.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] bala_gamer:
Peeked in to read some good info, ended up reading some my c*ck is better than yours argument for pages, wth.

Texted from Note 4
[Galaxy Note 4 General] midreestaj:
Gamebench v1.3 analysis of Asphalt 8 game play - Device: Note 4 Exynos

Please find below 6 images attached in the numbered order for your reference

I would also request Note 4 SD users to upload their data in comparison

[1] Summary.jpg (88.7 KB) - Play duration 3 min 26 sec

[2] FPS.jpg (133.7 KB) - Median 60 fps, max 60 fps, min 57 fps

[3] CPU-Load.jpg (142.5 KB) - Peak 20%, min 14%, median 15%

[4] CPU-Frequencies.jpg (219.8 KB) - All 8 cores active while playing, A53 @ max 1.3Ghz, min 0.5 Ghz, avg 1Ghz & A57 @ max 1.6 Ghz, min 0.5Ghz, avg 1Ghz

[5] GPU-Load&Frequency.jpg (143.2 KB) - Peak 100 %, min 74%, median 78% of the frequency that did not exceed 420/700 Mhz, Averaged @ 350 Mhz

[6] RAM-Usage.jpg (126.8 KB) - max 156 MB, median 139 MB
[Galaxy Note 4 General] iba21:
Simply all can do 10h or more if they don't use the phone

if you look at the graph the consuption is absolutely costant.. what it means? He put the phone in min backlight with screen always on, cpu goes to minfreq since there aren't any workload and the only min consuption is the screen and a min of cpu usage

That's not a common use

I don't think why all of you needs to do 10h of screen on in 1 day.. i live in italy, here it's difficult to find work, we have 30% of unemploied and, i can't do more than 3h in 1 day, but, not with all the battery, but i can't use the phone more than 3h since i have a real life!

And i work with the phone!!

Well.. thats what andreilux sad..

It's unusefull to post battery screen, he could do 12h of screen on usage with his s4 octa..

So...
[Galaxy Note 4 General] more2come:
I easily can get through a whole day with moderate to high usage on the N910C. With dynamic screen brightness set to highest, I had about 3h of screen on time (playing Sky Force, Royal Revolt 2) and had still 33% after about 15h. That totally works for me!
[Galaxy Note 4 General] SeCKToR:
Brazil - ZTO ROM.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] POLO_i780:
No.

Screen brightness sat at 30%, and watching season 1 of 'The 100' hence why my Mediaserver is high, also due to listening to music quite a bit.

Quite entertaining to read people's uneducated conclusions though :D

The Note 4 sips power when watching vids, each episode was HD1080P @ 30fps, with each episode at around 40mins and 12 episodes, the fact that I say I was watching series was a DEAD GIVEAWAY of how the phone managed 10H SOT. ;)
[Galaxy Note 4 General] midreestaj:
My intuition is telling me that coming Lollipop will improve two things at least if not anything else; performance penalty on SD and battery endurance on Exynos. Samsung is well aware of these issues and they are fixing them as first priority. They will not let their Note level device alone.

And this IMO is the reason of a longer fine tuning on Note 4 Android Lollipop update more than anything else. Moreover, IMO SD805 is right up to the task of handling a QHD device very well however problem roots from the half cooked drivers for the same (from Qualcomm) and issue gets worse when non-conformant/less optimized code (by Samsung) of TW meddles with it. In its full goodness SD Note 4 will be at least 95% of performance that guys with Exynos Note 4 will get on Lollipop :highfive:
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Bruce lee roy:
Due to sd805 occupying nexus 6, I predict SD will outperform Exynos after lollipop releases. That being said, my stock sd in kk has zero lag/stutter/fr drop outside multi button and battery is on par or better than n2. I've played ton of games, gear vr, and countless apps almost without a hiccup. Perhaps radio compatibility with region has something to do with negative reports.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] tmac31:
So it means it will outperform 2015 devices too... Seriously do you believe it?
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Bruce lee roy:
No just Exynos 5433. This largely due to optimization. Fragmentation has long been a major setback for android. This time around, n4 sd shares soc and screen resolution with Google/Android development platform device; giving edge to sd. If Samsung developed their own os, optimized for in house chip (Exynos), that would be another story.

Of course this is all conjecture since lollipop has yet to drop.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] midreestaj:
So did the note 3, it shared specs with nexus 5. History is just repeating and I too hope SD805 Note 4 will catch up with Exynos. And when it is said; it means GPU and memory wise as Adreno 420 is not delivering in the real world application as it should and so is the data move around capabilities of SD805 are lacking in comparison to Exynos.

However CPU wise it will not be able to match Exynos and that is not required too for the seamless user experience in UI, apps & games. The Kraits will do the job just enough and good with a margin to go even beyond. Exynos with its 8 cores has way too much grunt which is not even fully exploited. Not until we have a bigger battery at least.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] tmac31:
I guess its 3rd year there is a nexus device and another company device out there with a fully matched hardware. Dont expect more optimization. Cuz touchwiz is nearly another os running over android. You get whatever samsung gives so forget about aosp android advantages etc. If samsung ****s up everyrhing you can even live with gingerbread running over lollipop. So if samsung optimize touchwiz you can get better performance android 5.0 itself just cant bring more performance for a skinned device.

Sd has advantage for aosp custom roms dont expect something about touchwiz. They can only slow down exynos like they are removing 64 bit from it. There is a raw cpu power advantage like 20-30%. Samsung is mostly limiting exynos 5433 performamce to match s805.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Lodix:
Android is not optimiced for an specific SOC, it doesn't matter if the Nexus 6 has the SD805.

Indeed the the Exynos is almost pure ARM SOC, so it will be more optimiced.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Bruce lee roy:
An interesting read:

http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/samsung-tizen-os-features

On paper, Exynos has long been the more capable chip. But without optimization and development support raw power becomes a mute point (at least for most of us on xda). All this, combined with even the slightest edge in gpu power, my prediction that sd outperforms Exynos on Lollipop still stands.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] Lodix:
On paper ?? You can ser it in real life.

They are both equally optimized, if not being the Exynos even more cause it is pure ARM architecture. Can you please stop saying that the Exynos doesn't have development ?? Yes, it has.

They have a very similar GPU performance, but Exynos is better for OpenGL and runs the games better.

And tell me why with lollipop the SD will outperform Exynos ??? Indeed if it brings 64bit capabilities... The Exynos will lead even more.
[Galaxy Note 4 General] -Sweeper_:
I wonder what kind of optimization the SD supporters are talking about. Krait is dead and most of this year's flagships will use ARMv8 Cortex A57/A53 chips (Qualcomm included). If anything Exynos will perform even better in Lollipop, and if the same A57+Mali T760 combination is present in all (or most) Galaxy S6 models like rumours suggest then support should be great for those planning to keep the phone for 2+ years.