yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] catalin22:
heloo

i tried to downgrade from spl 1.06 to 1.04 but when i have to update the radio

i update to a new rom with botloader 1.09 and he blocked

sorry my english...
[TouchPad Development] firepower9966:
Webos Ports has released Open webOS for Touchpad and now has new name of LuneOS.

This be another OS for our touchpad :)

Warning its still early Alpha. I hope it also get some supports

http://webos-ports.org/wiki/Tenderloin_Info

I have data reset my Touchpad and installed android Kitkat via the great Touchpad Toolbox by jcsullins. I like to dual boot between android and LuneOS

The difficult part is to do step 1. of install with no webOS. installed. I have tried but have limited knowledge of android / linux file systems :(

1. Create an ext3fs lvm partition of at least 1GB (use Tailor or Meta-Doctor to achieve this). It must be named ext3fs ! Tailor automatically uses this name for an ext3 partition.

If some dev or android guru's could help by creating a android app or script to create ext3fs partition and allow it to be mounted. (maybe another option for Touchpad Toolbox) ;)

LuneOS is based on android kernel/drivers and even list android version in settings / about.

The future plan is to be able to install on any rooted android device. Currently installs on Galaxy Nexus, Nexus 4, Nexus 7 (2012), and Touchpad.
[TouchPad Development] chris5s:
You could always use the touchpad toolbox to reinstall webos then follow the instructions there…
[TouchPad Development] firepower9966:
I tried it and was lot of work for create one partition, I corrupted my webos boot and the lune.OS image had bug of no WiFi connection.(webos Ports were quick to update new image that worked). Had to data reset and start again. After seeing that lune.OS is android based has to be a easier way for us who now only have android. I don't plan to go back to webos as apps are loosing there support and browser so outdated. Line.OS is using modern browser engine, so even not many apps should be able to use websites apps.
[TouchPad Development] chris5s:
I think atm its a very major WIP, and as such installation etc is for the very hardy lol.

Once more development has taken place then it will become easier to install and use.

Btw, think maybe this thread should be in a different forum?

Anyway, thanks for the info!
[TouchPad Development] shumash:
It should be in the "Other Touchpad Development" forum
[TouchPad Development] Atari-San:
I think what could help you might be this topic : http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1426244

If you try to do something like this, just knowing what are the partition space and name value you need instead for android /data/media and the luna webOS port and you might be able to do something.

General Idea :

#1 : Using the recovery from the link, make the partition you need for luna and make a single partition of android which is the media store line, don't do the other line if you don't need it, they are legacy dual boot value.

#2 : Untar your installing file, you might want to refer to the old Arch Linux installer or Ubuntu Installer, they are pretty easy to code.

#3 : Boot Toolbox and install your android.

I hope for you this Luna WebOS port don't use the old media partition from Android non data/media because it will be a pain to get enough space for each partition to share between the 2 OS.

Edit : Ok, so you really need WebOS... Ok, just follow the full tutorial from the link or use the toolbox by following the onscreen tutorial (toolbox's the better option). I was thinking it was something like the Ubuntu Touch install or other Linux.
[TouchPad Development] blmvxer:
You may be able to set Lune OS and Android on the same /data/media and then set permissions in each OS to only allow each respected OS read its own "sdcard".
[TouchPad Development] alex1301:
Hey guys,

I have two questions.

1. How can I install a new nightly? There are so many different files for one date.

2.Can I replace webos with lunaOs? and how can I do it?
[TouchPad Development] firepower9966:
There are 2 types of luneOS images, one Dev and one non Dev, Dev has a lot of inbuilt logging for developers.

There is now a luneOS forum at

http://forums.webosnation.com/luneos/

The luneOS install has been updated and easier to understand.
[TouchPad Development] firepower9966:
May be able to use this info to install luneOS on data media.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2761381
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] s1t1n:
Hi guys i need help root LG P500 . I tried GingerBreak-v1.20 , z4root , LG_Esteem_Root and SuperOneClickv2.2-ShortFuse but nothing works ...:( ( 2.3.3 & V20g ) .

can anyone help me? where is the problem?
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] Dimmay:
I've been searching but no success in finding Camera app like in Note 3 or S5 flashable zip for the N7105.

I'm searching for the camera flashable zip cuz I don't have any luck when I go through a root explorer. I just f*ck things up. Can someone please tell me or send me a link if it exists?

Thank you :)
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] manuel1992:
I am interested too
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] User9948:
S5 camera app

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=53074743

[INDEX] Galaxy S5 Ported Apps
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] emanuelparedes:
So... First of all, I'm not asking for the best ROM.

At the moment, I'm using ArchiDroid v2.5.2 on my i9300, and it's fast, but... Random reboots, and the camera quality it's not the same as in the 4.3 ROM's.

What I want is a ROM with no random reboots, with the best camera quality and of course, as fast as AOSP or even faster :P

So... Which ROMs (and kernel) do you guys recommend?

I'm tired of switching between 4.4.x ROMs, all of them have bugs. The Note2 ports are laggy (even though everybody is saying that these ROMs are smooth as butter) and AOSP have the problems that I've mentioned before.

Help me, please :P
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gabyif:
Best/Recommend Roms/kernels threads are not allowed on XDA, try them yourself and decide.

If I were to recommend you I would say ArchiDroid or NeatRom

Sent from my GT-I9300 powered by ArchiDroid+ArchiKernel
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] emanuelparedes:
Yes, I know that. But there are SO many ROMs and I've tried lots of them, and none of them are "perfect".

ArchiDroid or NeatROM? JellyBean versions? I've tried both, but the KK version.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andjeomilosrdja:
Yes,Jb versions.

There are no such thing as perfect,you need to make sacrifice
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] emanuelparedes:
I'm going to try ArchiDroid. Is it based on Stock ROM or AOSP?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andjeomilosrdja:
Stock JB
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] broken920:
Try Imperium KK: stable, smooth and pretty fast! This ROM is based on Note2 porting developed by JustArchi

http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s3/development/rom-t2842856
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] emanuelparedes:
Thanks for the suggestion. But I've read the comments and "everybody" was talking about FC and bugs.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] broken920:
Try Imperium 29 based on 4.3 stock deodexed ;)

http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s3/development/rom-imperium-v26-0-v13-6-t2135852
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] emanuelparedes:
First I will flash ArchiDroid V1.7.18 and if I don't like it, I'll flash this one. Thanks!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tkkg1994:
Stock debloated

I would use the stock Android 4.3, root it and than remove all the Bloatware from Samsung, install Googy Max2 and you got a pretty fast phone :P
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Simone98RC:
Abort the Samsung laggy and almost useless world, choose AOSP roms.

I can propose you the only AOSP rom tried: CyanogenMod 11.

Download the latest M release (more stable than nightlies).

Note that there are some minor bugs, a 4.4 "perfect" system for S3 actually doesn't exist.

Then... the better kernel is BOEFFLA, useless to say [emoji6]

Download the related app (the latest BOEFFLA Config-v2 apk), choose zzmove or pegasusqplus as governor, while as scheduler choose sio.

To boost your phone, have fun with all the kernel parameters, CyanogenMod is considered the better rom, all other AOSP roms are based on CM source code, useless to change os.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hundred_miles_high:
This ↑

A wildly sweeping and inaccurate statement if ever there was one.

There are some exceptional stock based ROMS out there, with very good performance, good battery life and stock features that you don't get in AOSP which many people like to have (also from what i've seen, the stock Camera app gives better pictures too)
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Simone98RC:
I tried Android Revolution HD: at first was moving better than stock rom, but when I began to use hardly my device... too many lags and terrible slowdowns.

Caused mainly by the unremovable TouchWiz.

Using another launcher, the heavy TouchWiz works ever, for different reasons than the simple use of launcher.

You can remove all the bloatware, make lots of optimizations... but TouchWiz will "eat" your RAM (only 1 GB on I9300 and lots of its variants) and never you'll be able to quietly use so many apps as in AOSP roms.

On CyanogenMod, Trebuchet can be completely replaced by other launchers, unthinkable thing on a Samsung rom.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hundred_miles_high:
You tried one other stock based ROM and made your conclusion from that alone?

Each to their own, but I've used enough versions of CM on enough devices over the years to know the pros and cons, and personally on the S3 I can get a most satisfactory level of performance and battery life from a stock derived ROM whilst not losing any of the additional functions.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Simone98RC:
A Samsung rom is useful only for a better compatibility with Samsung devices and the 2-way call recording support.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hundred_miles_high:
Enough said, this is going off-topic and is not helpful to the OP, and as we both agree on your statement of 'A Samsung rom is useful for better compatibility' that's reason enough on it's own to recommend a stock derived ROM like Imperium as it will address the OP's original request of:

:cool:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Simone98RC:
Totally agree with the first thing, then you told a bull****, you based your "fictitious reason" on a my partial citation at your leisure.

To prevent misconceptions and "abuse" of what I said in the topic, [MENTION=4459146]hundred_miles_high[/MENTION] forget to explain that according to me, the stock roms "compatibility" is limited only to Samsung devices.

With BubbleUPnP and similar (you should know them), stock roms become completely useless... or you need the 2-way call recording? [emoji6]

OP dislikes (as everyone) forced reboots, and need a good camera quality. If the suggested rom is poorer in any other term respect to AOSP systems, it doesn't matter.

Is this your reasoning?

With CyanogenMod 11, the terrible 10.2 camera experience was aborted.

Stability is guaranteed, also if the releases are snapshots, more than 6 months of developing.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hundred_miles_high:
Why would a Samsung ROM be compatible with anything other than a Samsung phone? This is after all the SAMSUNG S3 forum isn't it, thought it would be pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain the context it was used in.

I don't understand your ramblings about BubbleUPNP but Bubble and Sempervid links work fine on my stock derived ROM - I use them regularly with youtube/tubemate , streaming web content and media on my other devices to play direct to my TV (or xbox or nexus 7 for that matter) through my S3.

Ran out of interest with rest of your post due to your rudeness, but maybe you should check the CM11 M9 thread in regard to complaints of poor sound quality in the camera app...........
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Simone98RC:
Yes, I was a bit hard in my answer, because you hurted me with your presumption and falsity to report properly my citation.

"This is after all the Samsung S3 forum"

With this stupid aforism you have damned lots of users who run a different rom.

I propose you to browse with brain (I dubt you know how use it, almost in this context) any S3 support forum, and see how many people use, speak and receive support about CyanogenMod, SlimKat, PacRom, etc.

And you are the first user who compare, even consider better a stock rom than AOSP... in terms of performance.

I hope you are joking.

"Ran out (...) Samsung devices"

You won't recognize the mistake (if not intentional) when you reported partially my famouscited my famous citation.

The truth is that you braved me since replying my first post: this is a topic where OP required "suggestions" (do you know this term?) from each user, not debates, nor topic wars.

Reread the topic, reflect about and get out, you told enough.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hundred_miles_high:
Who the hell do you think you are telling me to get out?

Just because I pointed out that it is the Samsung S3 forum (in response to your ramblings about Samsung ROMs better compatibility with Samsung devices) does not imply the use of only stock ROMs and nowhere have I even suggested that.

By performance I assume you mean speed, which I have said nothing in my posts about - you are the only one to mention it.

As absolute speed versus battery life impact each other so much I deliberately did not mention it, choice of kernel and user config can massively affect both for stock and AOSP. If you mean functionality then give me stock based any day....

I DID suggest a ROM several posts back, if you'd bothered to read the first part of post #13. it was you who started the debate after I disagreed with you when you implied that AOSP was better in every respect calling stock derived ROMs 'almost useless' which is inaccurate and misleading to the OP.

I am not wasting anymore time on you, or taking this thread any further off-topic.

END.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] broken920:
keep calm and buy an S5

My opinion is: AOSP are better in terms of performance and Sammy based for camera quality.

emanueleparedes wants a ROM with no random reboots, with the best camera quality and fast as AOSP or even faster :P.

I don't know a ROM fast as AOSP which takes photos like stock but only:

- AOSP: fast and good camera quality (improved with Boeffla)

- Sammy based: good performance and best camera quality

:highfive:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Simone98RC:
Simply greatful.

I forgot to say that CM 11 hasn't a real stabilization as in Samsung rom, so captures in AOSP (for both camera and camcorder) are more moved than ones in stock rom.

As I said yet, TouchWiz is unremovable and critical for RAM consumption, so never AOSP performance, also because it's a "totally cleaned" system, except for a "replaceable" launcher.

Now, I can get out myself, [MENTION=5583010]broken920[/MENTION] have spoken for me [emoji6]
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] konohanz:
can't wait for new release ArchiDroid 2.5.x today :p
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jiggajigga88:
go for cyanogenmod. they have the best features included in my opinion
[Xposed General] hamzahrmalik:
I'm hooking a static method within class A

Class A contains a Context, mContext

i need to get the mContext

cannot use Xposedhelpers.getObjectField because i can't get param.thisObject so have nothing to pass to it

And i cant use

Class<?> clazz = XposedHelpers.findClass(LockPatternUtils, lpparam.classLoader);

Field f = clazz.getDeclaredField("mContext");

f.setAccessible(true);

c = (Context) f.get(what to pass here);

because i cant use the

field.get()

method, because i dont know what to pass

help is appreciated, thanks
[Xposed General] GermainZ:
You can't access non static fields from a static method. You'll have to find an alternative way.
[Xposed General] hamzahrmalik:
OK, thanks
[Nexus 5 Accessories] kirov37:
I got this phone 2 days ago, and I have noticed that the USB that came with it, has something like 2 little teeth at the bottom (I guess they are made to hold in the USB better)... But I kind of have to force the USB to come in, and I am afraid that I will damage the port. So is this USB safe to use and can it damage the port? Should I get an USB from another phone?
[Nexus 5 Accessories] Elluel:
Should be fine, I never had issues with it. :/
[Nexus 5 Accessories] ethantarheels123:
its fine. it's just new and needs to be broken in some. I would make an analogy to something else, but don't think it would be appropriate on xda :p
[Nexus 5 Accessories] kirov37:
So, I don't have to swap it? Could the port get damaged from this USB?
[Nexus 5 Accessories] republicano:
Its fine, 2 little teeth on the flat part, good usb cables will require some effort and may make a click sound.

My 3rd party usb have smaller teeth which makes the connection flimsy and insecure which is worse over time as it can bend the connection in the phone.

you shouldn't worry, you could use a Qi charger, what's worse is dust and lint blocking up the port being in your pocket which requires a clean
[Nexus 5 Accessories] bblzd:
The cable will ware out before the port on your phone does. That's why it was designed that way, I believe.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] mytopazjr:
I believe this wont damage your device
[Nexus 5 Accessories] techboy411:
Broken in like a car!
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GFXi0N:
Since day one, I installed cyanogenmod on my flo. I also have a nexus 4 with the same setup.

The main pros of cyanogenmod are profiles and incorporated usb otg.

Lately I have been experiencing a couple of issues that seem have no solution, or I'm the only one experiencing them.

Now, I'd like to know what is most people running on their Nexus, regardless of model.

I'm even thinking about rooted stock with xposed. I don't see many advantages on roms, and cyanogenmod and it's profiles are useless for me on this device.

So, what's your advice?

Thanks.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheLastSidekick:
On my Nexus 5 I use Rastakat Rastaboost and on my Nexus 7 I run Rastakat as well. I'm not saying either is better, you need to find what works for you. I had many problems with other roms especially on the grouper but Rastakat has yet to fail me.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wtherrell:
On my grouper, Paranoid Android.

CM & Titanium were incompatible on my N7 and my SGS4. Hyperdrive on my s4.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Prof Peach:
Carbon rom is working well for me atm.

I've also run paranoid android and paranoid saberdroid quite happily. Each has its own feel/look but carbon and niva launcher feels lighter for me.

Sent from my Galaxy S5 running NeatRom 0X0
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GedBlake:
Hi, GFXi0N...

Rooted stock with xposed (and GravityBox) is (IMHO) a pretty good option. You get all the stability of factory stock AND the additional functionality of most Custom ROMs... Extended Power Down Menu, Configurable Nav. Bar, Configurable Notification Bar, Configurable Quick Settings 'Tiles', Configurable PIE settings. And that's just with GravityBox!!

And it's (relatively) easy to revert back to pure factory stock in the event of an imminent OTA update.

Further, xposed framework modues like GravityBox are APKs, and are installed in much the same way you would sideload any app. Which means they can be easily backed up by Titanium. So in the hugely unlikely event of a seriously buggy release of GravityBox (for example), you can just 'roll back', via Titanium, to the previous release.

Xposed and perhaps a custom kernel, like Franco, work well together, and provide a good middle ground between pure factory stock and some of the more adventurous (but arguably less reliable) Custom ROMs:).

Anyway... just my thoughts...

Good luck in whatever you choose.

Rgrds,

Ged.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GFXi0N:
This is the kind of advice I was looking for. A lot of kernel dev even use stock rooted, they don't want complications. I grew a bit tired of every rom out there. Some of them have few active developers, some others lack some features, and some others, like cyanogenmod, has a couple of things i don't like, like cyanogenmod account, and a couple of extra apk that I don't use. Then comes the compatibility problems that, at least, you find using cyanogenmod on nexus 4.

I think i will try stock rooted with xposed. There is a lot of intensive development in that area and you can get the best of every rom, enable whichever feature you want and keep the system stable at the same time.

Thank you very much.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] didoop:
Hello !

I have again cracked my display on s3, but whitout shattering glass this time -_-.

Last time i bought replacement display for 110$ (with postage) from hong kong, but the screen was somehow smaller, there were bigger spaces between frame and display. Also colors were more white-ish. One word - not genuine.

Is it possible to buy a genuine replacement this time ? Any suggestions (ideally ebay link) ?

Thanks
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boomboomer:
A genuine display assembly will cost more than a second hand phone, buy one with a dead emmc and swap the display over.
[Samsung Galaxy S II Plus] ahmed elsery:
Hello i've Galaxy S ll Plus GT-l9105P .. and i want to flush firmware on it cuz i've 4.1.2 android and there is another firmwares with 4.2.2 but when i check sam website i didn't find any firmware that match my country (Egypt) so how can i know which firmware is suitable with my Country ? :/

if anyone can help me i'll be thankful :):)
[Samsung Galaxy S II Plus] rs tony:
Try update via OTA or Kies and then ask again.
[Samsung Galaxy S II Plus] ehsan.gdrzi:
no difference

you can download any 4.2.2 and if it doesn't have arabic, you can download it by phone in Setting/Language and Input/Language

4.1.2 roms don't support downloading languages
[Samsung Galaxy S II Plus] BECKHAM 7:
Install Latest NEE Firmware It's The Better And It's Fully Support Arabic

( I'm From Egypt Too )
[Samsung Galaxy S II Plus] ahmed elsery:
Thanks Guys For Your Help all ;)

Thanks bro i'll try it and if something went wrong i'll come back and post a replay =)

Thanks Again ;))
[Samsung Galaxy S II Plus] BECKHAM 7:
You Are Welcome Bro ?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mohamadreza:
Hi

Is there any stable ported S5 rom for S4 i9500?

There is some rom with S5 theme but i want a rom that ported from S5 rom.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] bartosz77s:
hi after replacing touch screen my wizard wont chang screen orientation when open to qwerty, any help please !!!
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] rkwhyte2:
Who did the work? You or somebody else.

Kirby
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] bartosz77s:
disasembling myself soldering servis guy, using htc service manual, unit was in parts for a month waiting for new screen, could that affect yhe magnets, where are they any way, apart from that everthing works fine,
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] rkwhyte2:
I think that you are stuck with taking it apart again to see what you missed. Not sure where the magnets are located I have scanned thru the manual but haven't given it a real good reading yet.

Good Luck,

Kirby
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] bartosz77s:
i've done it 3 times already, every screw is in place, nothing is missing, could that be a software problem, or keybddr.dll problem, ?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] rkwhyte2:
Whoa 3 times you are an expert at taking the thing apart at this point. I don't have any other ideas but with any luck somebody will give you an answer. Sorry i couldn't be more help.

Kirby