[ONE Original Android Development] jgcaap:
hello my friend. sorry for the delay but today i had lunch of family and i went after to work. So during the work i've done many tests which i hope is informative as also is helpfull for our analisys. As i am happy that after you reverted Wifi and applied patches it made up a stable build which worked for me. And since, i would like to be with your kernel, i am insisting on some issues which led me to believe that i found a solution, but after so many tests i come up to unconclusive answer (what i mean i am problably wrong), but in hope that we can try come up with some conclusions in what is causing our phone to get lower performance than it should.

All the tests Screen shots:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dtjmwz86wzqiuq8/AAC5ztXFhJN7z2WeMy_T9IiCa?dl=0

I'll try put here in order since i was doing this while working.

First during lunch, first test done with Default CM kernel for reference:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v6nbasdplp3qdmt/Screenshot_2014-11-02-13-35-34.png?dl=0

As its respective graph:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/d3cc4ge6qolsgc4/Screenshot_2014-11-02-13-35-49.png?dl=0

So that we might know what would happen between tests.

Now i started testing AK kernel, and decided to start with consistency:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xpe5jhxwbzuy8f9/Screenshot_2014-11-02-19-56-11.png?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/io123as9t0ffexr/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-02-27.png?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3f5r61vx6p0ffkj/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-08-43.png?dl=0

As you can see, results are not consistent.

Respective graph: https://www.dropbox.com/s/si71gmj6q8be6c1/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-09-03.png?dl=0

Now i started the analysis with the tests that AK requested.

First test was with this configuration:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9i7a4tfa7qyzabt/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-25-01.png?dl=0

Which led to:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/50s6en0fpsmb7yv/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-28-44.png?dl=0 (which is the supposed "normal" for our chip)

And from analyzing the graph:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/bmo9vaecyqlc5ox/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-28-53.png?dl=0

it didn't respect the temperature which we defined. According to what i understood AK, in this situation i am working with thermald.

After this test two with intellithermal: https://www.dropbox.com/s/78jc63v9yxhjsop/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-38-38.png?dl=0

Results: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oqlgfyidbqy9hcb/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-38-22.png?dl=0

Graph shows it respected temperatures :

https://www.dropbox.com/s/60zzaipmrgybo45/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-38-51.png?dl=0

For Test Three I changed the configuration where i turned thermald mode on: https://www.dropbox.com/s/gxcj2twkijcx6uo/Screenshot_2014-11-02-21-00-01.png?dl=0

Firstly gave me this results:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/klcawtrmnoresd7/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-47-18.png?dl=0

And the phone was lagging alot, without touching anything it changed frequency to the minimum 268Mhz and Maximum 268Mhz (i dont even know how he completed the test LOL)

I changed to minimum : 268Mhz and 2457Mhz as Max

And Test four result was: https://www.dropbox.com/s/m4bjli05z9os5s6/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-55-16.png?dl=0

Graph: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7sa6lkbjs96jxyh/Screenshot_2014-11-02-20-55-32.png?dl=0

Decided to test again with same configuration:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/10c4m06nsxu21pp/Screenshot_2014-11-02-21-07-48.png?dl=0

And its temperature:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nfemt9fexbnit0q/Screenshot_2014-11-02-21-07-58.png?dl=0

Now with intellithermal ON: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a5h17u5xsenr4mi/Screenshot_2014-11-02-21-08-07.png?dl=0

Result: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4rfx0zzlcuijnkn/Screenshot_2014-11-02-21-53-51.png?dl=0

Decided to run again: https://www.dropbox.com/s/med92zwf5dm4cw9/Screenshot_2014-11-02-22-00-03.png?dl=0

After benchmarking many times, decided to try CM kernel again and check if i damaged anything on my phone :

https://www.dropbox.com/s/7mianb5ee1el0tb/Screenshot_2014-11-02-22-12-38.png?dl=0

As you can see the result is very similer to the first one and consistent.

Again i flashed AK:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/4ka05rgv6a6ckm4/Screenshot_2014-11-02-22-32-24.png?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/dxlk58etqjawqk1/Screenshot_2014-11-02-22-38-20.png?dl=0

Graph:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ydq830n43bx4ey4/Screenshot_2014-11-02-22-42-38.png?dl=0

Decided to lower frequency of CPU to 1.9 GHZ:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/g2kg30qs11r7blz/Screenshot_2014-11-02-22-47-52.png?dl=0

As you can see, in order to prove my point, and this is not to bash AK, on the contrary, is to create an evolution of this kernel to something better, SOMETHING is cutting performance of AK. I point on the thermal code, as i believe that it is doing Throttle at the temperature. But, as i said in the beginning, tests are inconclusive.

---------- Post added at 12:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:12 AM ----------

For that you can always underclock...

But in order to situate my point. We are speaking here on actual performance that is not consistent, and before we got lost on this kernel, on whats ok and whats wrong, we should review what is being done. I'm no expert in C, been studying it, but i see that compared to this kernel is for me still a bit hard to read up the code. But that didnt stop me of trying to find an answer as i also learn with it, as i'm sure AK learns as everyone else.

Also, the phone behaving as it is now, will tear down battery faster as it'll do the jobs "slower", also to add that, can damage the circuits easier because, if you are taking lower time doing a job if is "stress full" will take more time at higher CPU levels, which means hotter phone.

Cool phone, Good battery profiles, and efficiency thats my philosophy, and is what i seek. As before, to many of you got a good battery profile, which keeps the phone cool and fast. If we discover what cutting the power and giving this inconsistencies to our device, believe me, AK kernel not only will be "famous" as all other kernels will "copy" his findings.