yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] Deleted member 307775:
Guys

I have been using shoguns rom for while now and keep checking for a final one..

However since this rom i have seen threads about 3.2 and all the gods shogun,molski,DrP ,faria,risidoro are working on roms and i am totally confused.

But its beenok as i know eventually i will read a thread saying " this rom is fantastic and works on my G4" then i can just use that one.

Problem is since yesterday my perfect shogun machine has been playing up.

I didnt receive a txt all day assumed that all my friends have deserted me.

But whats happening is that my txts are not getting thru.

after testing I have worked out that if someone sends a txt then my phone lights up but nothing arrives.

If i remove my 2gb then txts get through as normal

If i remove my 2gb al ong time after someone sends the txt then they get lost in the ether .

What ever the issue is ( installed skype and agile the day before and now removed them again) i need a working phone.

I am expecting a text from sandra bullock saying she cant stand to be without me and wants to have my babies, and i really dont want to miss that txt

anyone with knowledge of this problem ?

or anyone using the latest roms with G4 ( locked)?

help would be appreciated.

Also
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] baarod:
How far overclocked is your G4? The tmail.exe app has known problems with overclocking corrupting the mailstore. In my case I get notified of mail sometimes and then when I go to look at it, there's no mail there.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] Deleted member 307775:
Im set t 240. just tried downing it to 162 and reseting etc but no change.

I think short of a new G4 rom I need to reset , wipe my 2gb and reinstall the apps one by one.

~Damn

I was really hoping for good new rom to be here by now.

bhayani
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] Deleted member 307775:
after lots of searching i have sorted it. i deleted the inbox folder on the 2gb and it all works again. damnn!. i went to tell my brother and he said " yeah i did that last week. sorted it out straight away arghhhhhh.

bhayani
[General Topics] DrRuckingFetard:
Hi all,

Not sure whether everyone knows this yet or not, but in one of the recent PS4 firmware updates it added a pairing function to the DS4 controller so it could be wirelessly paired with a Playstation 3 as well.. Turns it out also works with Android too (I've tested with my N7 2013 and N5, both running PAC rom 4.4.4) and it works straight away WITHOUT the need of a third-party app :D

- When the DS4 is off, press and hold the Share button and the PS Button and it enters pairing mode

- Search for bluetooth devices with your phone/tablet and it should come up straight away as Wireless Controller

Just thought i'd post this incase anyone didn't know about it and wanted to try it out on their device too and see if it works :good:
[General Topics] liltitiz:
on which device and version of android? I could not pair my DS4 with my Minix x7 android 4.4.2
[General Topics] DrRuckingFetard:
... seriously? read my post again and you'll have your answer.
[General Topics] Farlo1:
I'm trying to pair my DS4 and rooted (but otherwise stock) N5 but it doesn't seem to work. I put the DS4 in discoverable mode (Share + PS buttons) and"Wireless Controller" shows up in the list of available devices, but when I try to pair them it just sits there "Pairing..." forever. It's been at it for almost 10 minutes now and nothing's happening. I tried restarting the phone and waiting like 20 minutes for the controller to restart but I've run out of ideas. Any suggestions?
[General Topics] sambarnes90:
Same Issue

I'm having exactly the same problem [MENTION=4856145]Farlo1[/MENTION].

I did read somewhere that the early DS4s don't work using this method.

But those released after a certain date do.

I've got 2 DS4s but they're both from launch, so neither of them is working with this. The only way I've seen to use the DS4 is to invest in a cable, which I don't really want to do...

Let me know if you spot anything different!
[General Topics] julienrl:
Hey, I had my DS4 working flawlessly in my z3 compact, but since I have a GS5, the mapping is all screwy. I tried installing sixaxis and it just added a massive 1+ second lag, with only part of the button press registering, and then it goes all crazy and scrolls everywhere. This gets even worse in PPSSPP, where as soon as I touch the analogue stick it goes haywire... but it was flawless with my z3!

Anyone know anything about this?
[General Topics] shibin331313:
doesn't work for playing

I connected everything and started ninjumb dash(game) but the controller(ps4)didn't turn the colour blue and it is not working

pls tell me what to do next

---------- Post added at 02:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:59 PM ----------

if u have ps4 ,remove socket of your ps4(otherwise when u press ps4 button it will turn on and automatically connect your controller)

and then press(ps4+share) to turn on Bluetooth(ds4)and search in Bluetooth and connect(wireless controller.
[General Topics] bearzi:
same problem

sorry for bringing this post back...

but i'm suffering with this exactly problem!!!

tested with a galaxy s7 edge and a nexus 5.

any workaround? fix?
[General Topics] Netrogen:
Hi my DS4 connect to my phone normally but it works little bit slow and I don't know why ?
[General Topics] Aid777:
I know this is a really old post. Never mind. I am able to connect DS4 to my Android phone (using share and PS button), and play games (such as Final Fantasy from the play store), however the buttons are not configured correctly (X is cancel, O is confirm!). Is there any app that will remap the buttons. I have used Sixaxis for the PS3 controller, but would prefer to use the DS4. However each time you switch to Android gaming and PS4 gaming you need to reconnect the controller to each device with OTG cable which is a pain . I have tried Tincore app, but cannot get it to work as don't know how it works!
[General Topics] sky.walker:
I was surprised at how easy this was, but yes seems to have some input lag,

I found this on reddit

"Now after about 30sec, and for some unknown reason, you will run into input lag. To fix this you will need to download an app called Bluetooth Auto Connect. Once installed goto Advanced Options - Connect Now. Once you push Connect Now the input lag should be gone."

I haven't had a chance to try this yet but seems promising
[General Topics] straitjacket525:
Ds4 controller syncs fine to my LG Aristo but it doesn't actually control ****, any game that uses a controller does not see the Ds4. I can use my ds3 with the sixaxis app but I can't do a thing with this Ds4.
[Xperia Z1 Compact Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rebecker:
Any suggestions for an app to rotate the lock screen? Regular rotation works; not the lock screen. Thanks.
[Droid Ultra Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AFResearcher:
Hello,

I do cellphone research for a company that processes 100,000s of cells each year. Currently, we are re-examining these 2 models. From my research, the only real difference without using a scale is the ROM size. The Maxx having a 32 and Ultra having 16. At one point back in March, both model names were the same: Droid Maxx.

My problem comes when presented with several the last few days that in the model name area say Droid Ultra but have 32 as ROM size. I am totally perplexed and wonder if anyone here could provide some insight into this at all. We have to properly identify every unit that comes through and this is proving to be a conundrum.

Thanks for reading.

AFResearcher
[Droid Ultra Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] akellar:
The Ultra has always been 16GB. Maxx was originally 32GB however they relaunched it with color options a few months ago and at the same time lowered it down to 16GB. No Ultras are 32GB.
[Droid Ultra Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Orion575:
Two weeks ago I bought a heavily used Droid Ultra with 32Gb memory from Swappa and I was surprised, because I never seen an Ultra with 32Gb
[Droid Ultra Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] akellar:
Sorry but there's zero evidence of a droid ultra 32gb existing.
[Droid Ultra Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rlmesq:
Where do I sign up for a "research" job that pays me to post to online forums?
[Verizon Galaxy S 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jpcalhoun:
I have TiBu on my Dev S5 and TiBu reports 3.09 GB of system memory (ROM). The official specs on the Dev S5 says 2GB of system memory. Anyone else getting the same reading?
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
There is a new security vulnerability in town, this time labeled "Fake ID" (Google bug 13678484).

The bug allows malicious apps to pretend to be signed by trusted providers and be loaded as extensions in several contexts such as NFC access, browser plugins and others.

An excellent explanation can be found on this article by Jeff Forristal from Bluebox.

Checking if you're vulnerable

It appears to currently affect all devices, to a lesser or greater extent depending on which extensions each manufacturer included in their ROMs.

You can use Bluebox Security Scanner to detect if your system is vulnerable.

Installing the fix

Fetch the package from the Xposed repository: http://repo.xposed.info/module/tungstwenty.xposed.fakeidfix (it is also available on Google play)

Install as usual and make sure that you enable the module on the Xposed Installer and reboot.

There are no configuration options. There is a simple information screen which can be accessed by tapping the entry on the Installer's module list (you won't see an icon for this on your launcher).

Fix details

For the tech savvy, here's an explanation of what this patch does.

The JarTools class has an API for grabbing all signature certificatates present on an APK / jar. That API doesn't however check if *all* certificates form a valid chain, where each certificate is properly signed by the next one and so on, and not additional certificates are present that don't belong to that chain. It is therefore possible to insert additional certificates in that list, and *certain* callers of that API might be fooled if they assume that just because a certificate is on that list, the party to which it belongs did in fact sign or trust that code.

This behavior could not be blindly changed to enforce checking the chain validity, as apparently it would create compatibility issues on some legitimate callers of that API that rely on that behavior, and Google opted (see this AOSP commit) to include an option to both of the behaviors, keeping the old "insecure" one for code that doesn't bother specifying what it wants, i.e. all existing code.

I haven't spotted any other commits that rely on this new behavior, but from my analysis it seems that the identified vulnerability vectors all go through the getPackageInfo(..., GET_SIGNATURES) PM API.

Therefore, so as not to cause the compatibility issues that Google seems to be cautious about, I have chosen to modify the behavior of JarTools.createChain() only when it's being used by the PM service. This will stop the possibility of using malicious apps impersonating NFC extensions (e.g. Google Wallet), Adobe web plugins, etc.

Additionally, and since Bluebox Security Scanner does a more direct check (in order not to require installing a malicious / proof-of-concept APK in order to then ask the PM service about its signatures), I also included code specific to this scanner so that it reports the bug as not present.

Source code

Available on Github

If you appreciated this fix, consider donating with Paypal.

Thanks!
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
Version history

1.1

(2014-08-10)

Support for Xposed Framework 2.2 (bridge v30) and above

Support for Gingerbread 2.3.3 and above

Reduced potential for compatibility issues by patching only the system services but not other apps that might be using a private API

1.0

(2014-07-31)

Initial version
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
Reserved 2
[Xposed Framework Modules] lion7718:
thanks for the quick fix.
[Xposed Framework Modules] toxic-hero:
THANK YOU!
[Xposed Framework Modules] chw9999:
Works on ICS, thank you very much.
[Xposed Framework Modules] starbase64:
Bug is fixed in android 4.4.3.
[Xposed Framework Modules] debernardis:
Wow, yesterday I asked for it in the xposed ask-for-module thread, and now here it is! Thanks, I am donating asap.
[Xposed Framework Modules] defim:
[MENTION=4322181]Tungstwenty[/MENTION]

After a quick look I think it is better to not fake return args for Bluebox if the rom is fixed and this module does nothing to fix it

boolean romAlreadyFixed;
try {
XposedHelpers.findMethodExact("org.apache.harmony.security.utils.JarUtils", null, "createChain",
X509Certificate.class, X509Certificate[].class, boolean.class);
romAlreadyFixed = true;
}

...

if (romAlreadyFixed)
hookSuccessful = true;

}

...

public void handleLoadPackage(LoadPackageParam lpparam) throws Throwable {
if (!hookSuccessful) {
// Hooks not installed, don't report success to the activity nor the Bluebox scanner
return;
}
..
// Change the reported "createChain" method signature to Bluebox Security Scanner so it marks the bug as fixed
[Xposed Framework Modules] Ja_som:
Thank you...

Fake ID is fixed on my Moto G GPE with Android 4.4.4

But I installed this module to Nexus 7 2013 with Android 4.4.4

Sent from my tablet./Odoslané z môjho tabletu.
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
I agree, and in fact it's not messing with Bluebox if the ROM is already fixed :)

if ([B]result.length == 2[/B]) {
// Simulate that the method receives a 3rd parameter, boolean
...
}

But your comment is perfectly valid since in fact it's not evident from the code; I'll change it to use 2 different booleans on init so it becomes clearer.
[Xposed Framework Modules] defim:
Oh, to quick look :)
[Xposed Framework Modules] rahimali:
no it's not. i'm using 4.4.4 on maguro and bluebox still shows vulnerable without this fix installed. Thanks [MENTION=4322181]Tungstwenty[/MENTION] for the quickfix :good:
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
Does NOT work on my device (SGT P6800, ICS 4.0.4) (:

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
Sorry, I left my crystal ball in the other jacket. :rolleyes:

Could you provide some information? Like: what you did, what's the status of the module / what does it report, are there any errors in the Xposed error log, what do you see that makes you say "it does not work", etc.
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
thx for your quick reaction! :)

Xposed framework: 2.6.1

After installation (reboot) my tab froze totally

I can't install 2.7.1. message: you need bridge v. 52 or higher. No other error report.

I really would impreciate your tipp/help.

Thx in advance!

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk

(Kernel: Linux version 3.0.15-P6800XXLQ2-CL834397 (se.infra@SEI-46) (gcc version 4.4.3 (GCC) ) #3 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 4 18:06:40 KST 2012

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; de-at; GT-P6800 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30)
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
The minimum version of the bridge required for this module is 52.

If you have Xposed 2.6.1 installed and active, you should have version 54 (see this post) which is enough.

Please post a screenshot of the "Framework" tab of the installer (the one with the active/bundled numbers in green or red)
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
so sorry (ashamed) how to bring the screenshot in here?

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk

---------- Post added at 09:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:09 AM ----------

Screenshot you wanted

Again sorry: Xposed 2.5.1...

When I tried to install 2.6, message after reboot: Xposed Installer stopped.

So what is to do?

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
What version is reported on the About tab of the Xposed Installer?

anyway, you'll need to update it to a newer version, but I doubt that you indeed have version 2.6.1
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
Please look above... I've made a mistake... sorry again

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
I saw it, but I'd also like to check which "readable" installer version is mentioned in the

About

tab (e.g. Xposed version 2.6.1, 2.7, etc.)
[Xposed Framework Modules] marbulas:
Works good on galaxy note 3 kk :) Thx
[Xposed Framework Modules] juancarlos5:
thanks for the fix

work great in note 3 - rom dynamickat v4.2 - KK 4.4.2
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
Did you mean this? [emoji54]

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] rahimali:
just to provide feedback, i have xposed 2.6.1 on two devices and it works just fine on both

to elaborate

motorola razr m xt907 official cm v10.1.3 (v4.2.2)

and

samsung galaxy nexus paranoidandroid 4.45 (android v4.4.4)

no issues whatsoever
[Xposed Framework Modules] AndroTech:
The screenshot clearly says you have 2.5.1 and the latest version of exposed is 2.7.1 Experimental.

1. If you want to upgrade to 2.6.1 Tap on the "Xposed Installer" section. It will open the Xposed Installer page go to the 2nd tab and hit the Download button under ver 2.6.1.

2. Once you have installed 2.6.1 go to the Framework Section in the first screen and click on Install/Upgrade and reboot the device when it ask to reboot.

3. Install this Xposed module, activate this under Module tab and reboot the device

4. You are good now :)
[Xposed Framework Modules] Cyclu:
It's not Click Downloads on the top left and in the list choose About here you will can found the version of Xposed.

AndroTech You have right it's also here.
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
I tried to install 2.6.1 but after reboot my tab froze totally.

Thats why I don't know what to.

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
You should try 2.7 experimental also.

Failing that, follow the appropriate steps to troubleshoot that framework issue, e.g. reading this subforum: http://xdaforums.com/xposed

Make sure to read the FAQ and search for posts / threads mentioning your device.

Meanwhile I'll also check if the minimim version required by this mod can be lowered without any impact for other users, if so I'll publish an update which would work for your version (2.5)
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
with 2.7 the message: Xposed stopped.

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk

---------- Post added at 07:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:28 PM ----------

Thx a lot for your help!

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
Finally I got it[emoji2]

Thx again for your patient help!

Enjoy your weekend[emoji41]

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk

---------- Post added at 06:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:43 AM ----------

It works[emoji2] thx!

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] darren1:
Any plans to release a Gingerbread version? I can confirm it works on Gingerbread as I lowered the minimum sdk on your apk and it installed fine. Bluebox Scanner shows FakeID patched.
[Xposed Framework Modules] chandu72:
Sir how you put speed meter in notifications bar and the hd voice icon.
[Xposed Framework Modules] defim:
That's no evidence, as the module changes bluebox
[Xposed Framework Modules] frankgreimes:
Thank you so much for this
[Xposed Framework Modules] djmax81:
Lol bro u do not need this on note 3 touch wiz based roms at all especially android 4.4.2 its already patched :p
[Xposed Framework Modules] marbulas:
Are you sure?

I tested with bluebox's security scanner and found FakeID was not.

All of android has Fake ID issue. Check them out properly plz.
[Xposed Framework Modules] yeeahnick:
So people know my official 4.4.2 rom for galaxy S3 (sgh-t999v) had this patched already but my official 4.4.2 rom for note 8 (gt-n5110) did not. Thanks for this module it works perfectly!
[Xposed Framework Modules] frankee207:
Works great, thanks you dev !
[Xposed Framework Modules] liontari:
Thx a lot for the fix!

Gesendet von meinem GT-P6800 mit Tapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
It only changes bluebox as long as the hooks on the system code that fetches the certificates without the chain validation were already hooked.

Anyway, this detection based on the presence or not of the mentioned AOSP commit is not enough.

It only provides the *alternate* API for strict validation; for the fix to be enforced it is still required that the appropriate places do use that stricter mode.

I'm trying to setup a proof-of-concept APK including extra certificates to truly check if a system is properly filtering them out or not, regardless of the presence of this AOSP patch. I'll keep you posted.
[Xposed Framework Modules] Magissia:
Hello, are Gingerbread devices affected and do your fix work on Gingerbread ?

Thanks for all your awesome work as always.
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
As mentioned before, the APK I posted was compiled for ICS and above (4.0.3+).

But I have looked at the GB code (2.3.1 to 2.3.7) and the same logic applies, so compiling the module with GB support should be enough.

Once I'm able to create a sample APK with invalid signatures I'll ask you guys to test it out to truly find if your devices are vulnerable, and depending on the results we'll see if any further adjustments are needed. At that point I can lower the min version for this module so it can be used directly on GB.
[Xposed Framework Modules] PiggyFlooper:
Will you please make this compatible with Xposed Framework 2_4_1?

Sent from above using Xparent BlueTapatalk
[Xposed Framework Modules] Tungstwenty:
Request for tests

I'm asking for your feedback because I'm not completely certain that even if the current detection methods report ROMs as safe, they are indeed safe.

I have the impression that even if the AOSP fix commit is included in your ROM, that doesn't mean it is in fact protected. Please read below to test it yourselves.

Here's an app that will truly check if your system is vulnerable to FakeID or not, irrespective of having the "AOSP commit" built into your ROM.

This APK includes extra signature info (dummy, don't worry) that should be stripped out on a safe system.

When launched, it will display:

- whether the AOSP "fix" commit is included in your ROM or not (this is the detection done by the Bluebox scanner, I think)

- list any packages that have more than 1 certificate in the signature information

- for those, indicate whether the chain is valid or not

On an unsafe system, it should display itself (package "tungstwenty.fakeidcheck" as having incorrect signature info, as in the attached screenshot.

Notice the text: "Signed previous key: NO !!!"

On a safe system, it should state that there aren't any packages with multiple signatures. Or, if there are, "Signed previous key" should always say YES.

Please try it out on your devices and let me know the results.

Make sure that you perform the

installation while the FIX module is not active

(disabled and rebooted). Otherwise the extra signature will be stripped out during installation and even after disabling the module it will still not be reported even after reboot, unless a new installation of this checker is made.
[Xposed Framework Modules] claytonjn:
Developer Edition Verizon Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900V with stock KOT49H.G900VVRU1ANE9. I previously had FakeID fix installed on NCG because BlueBox reported vulnerable, but I have since done a wipe of /system and /data before flashing NE9 and BlueBox reported it patched so I didn't install FakeID fix. Curiously, tungstwenty.fakeidcheck is not displayed at all.
[Xposed Framework Modules] claytonjn:
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.0 GT-N8013 with OmniROM 4.4.4-20140802. Previously had FakeID Fix installed, but uninstalled and rebooted before installing FakeID check.