yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] LuckySwitz:
I live in Philippines and I think ebay is the most convenient for you.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Jiimmy97:
What's you do for status bar control xposed or its in the rom ??
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] ItsMeShouko:
Thanks a lot!
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] LuckySwitz:
Xtouchwiz. :laugh:
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] txordi:
Downloading the Marshmallow ROM as I got tired of little unstabilities of AOSP ROMs :'(. Let's come back to Touchwiz again after more than a year!! Any recommendation after the installation? :)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] pepe100:
The only advice is enjoy now the stability and the good battery life
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
I have now RR(M) and now i want to flash this rom with magisk

I must only flash it?or i must flash modem and bootloder?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] txordi:
Flash it as it is and you will be fine
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Have you read the OP? -> _alexndr wrote:

Just follow what the OP recommends - easy.

It should work also without updating bootloader/modem but don't complain in case of any issues afterwards.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
is that the actually version:

BL_G900FXXU1CRA2.tar.md5

CP_G900FXXU1CQK3.tar.md5
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Just read, everything is explained:

https://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=75512771&postcount=7782
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
Thank you

i have now magisk is it possible to flash a correct xposed?

and does it have a dark theme?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MysteryIII:
Magisk v15.31 beta is the last version passing SafetyNet on Stock S5, best you stick to stable 15.3. Systemless Xposed v87.3 SDK 23 is the last TouchWiz compatible Marshmallow version. Using Xposed you can't pass SafetyNet (same goes for using Adblocker)! However you can at least pass ctsProfile with No Device Check Module for Xposed. For some Apps (f.e. some banking Apps) it's enough.

You can always deactivate Xposed (and Adblockerr) to pass SafetyNet it just needs a longer restart as cleaning Dalvik/ART-Cache is needed for (de)activating Xposed.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
However you can at least pass ctsProfile with No Device Check Module for Xposed. For some Apps (f.e. some banking Apps) it's enough.

does pokemon go working then? now i have magisk and xposed but safety failed :(
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Hi,

Hmm ... interesting ... I am using adblocker and have no problem with passing SafetyNet check.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MysteryIII:
I have no idea, just try it or look into the dedicated thread.

Then you probably don't block google ads. They are part of SafetyNet Check, see here for detailed information (especially the SSL part).
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] ogremount:
A real 8500 mAh capacity battery should last 12-15 hours absolute minimum SOT on S5.

I still get 3-3.5 hours with my 4 year olds battery and 4.5-5.5 with my new OEM from RAWPower. That's from 2800mAh

Do the maths
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Only info about ad-blockers from your link I found in "SSL_redirect" part - in short it says that SSL_redirect module checks connections to some hosts including pubads.g.doubleclick.net attempting to check if an ad-blocker is installed. In theory if this host was not reachable the SafetyNet check should fail but it doesn't fortunately for me - in my case whole doubleclick.net domain is blocked by my active ad-blocker but still SafetyNet check passes successfully.

It seems that either SafetyNet service doesn't perform properly for ad-blockers or my ad-blocker is hidden well ;)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] LuckySwitz:
Why don't you buy one? :D

Then do the math you said..
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MysteryIII:
Most probably the latter one. Standard blocker like MoAB and Adaway block the connection globally to chosen addresses. You can't make exceptions per App but only per connection once again global. I guess your Adblocker works in another way, blocking connections on App base instead global. So which one are you using?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Strange, I'm using AdAway 3.2 in standard configuration.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Dr.N@:
For me the Rom lags

I used lastes Version 4.6 odex with magisk
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] pepe100:
I am using AdAway too. Not problem here :)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Then we both have no problem :)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] sk1887:
You can always try out GoodLock from samsung. Only bugs are the fingerprint lockscreen not working
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MysteryIII:
You are both right. After further testing I found the real problem: systemless hosts file!

In the moment I activate it in Magisk settings SafetyNet Check will fail, same goes if I just push hosts file into Devbase folder. So the real problem is not the blocking of Google Ads just the systemless linking will be detected in any case.

So in fact the method that was integrated to not mess with system partition, so we can hide root, is a real troublemaker. Thanks for your feedback, I wouldn't have tested it otherwise.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
is that possible to active the mass storage?

I'm talking about the old usb mass storage mode not the slow mtp mode
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Yes it is, but only for external SD card and unfortunately not for internal. You can do that from TWRP recovery or if you have Boeffla kernel - from Boeffla config app.

For more info on this topic read this article:

https://twrp.me/faq/datamedia.html
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
can u show me where that is on boeffla kernel. I can not find it

---------- Post added at 02:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:22 PM ----------

TWRP recovery

how is that possible??
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
From Boeffla config app: "Action > UMS mode"

From TWRP Recovery: "Mount > Mount USB storage"
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
Thank you its working. DO you have any good settings from battery life(on your boeffla kernel/settings) if yes can u share it
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Nothing special - I am using currently zzmoove governor with "Battery Plus" profile and sio scheduler, the rest settings - default.

I am not crazy about battery life (-> balance between battery life, stability and performance is more important for me) but still getting quite good results with these settings.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
delete
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
1) if the sun is shining i can not really see my screen. is ist possible to make the brightness higher?

2) do anyone have good boeffla kernel detting between battery life and can share it please
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] pepe100:
I see you have problem with battery I was having problem too. I changed my battery with a new one and the problem disappeared. This ROM is awesome in battery with stock kernel.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
how many screen on time do u get
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] LuckySwitz:
I'm getting this results with Zerolemon 8500mah battery using boeffla kernel with quite boosted performance settings.

Haven't tried with stock battery.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tangoman99:
Apologies wrong thread
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
csometimes i get the message

com.osp.app.sigin stopped

what is that and how can i fix it
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Roborootomat:
Magsik doesn't Remember Superuser-Apps

Hey there,

I've got Magisk Manager 5.5.5, Magisk v14.5 installed.

SavetyNet Status is OK.

But Magsik doesn't remember the Apps, that I gave permanent ROOT permission.

I tried a new Version of Magsik Manager, but the App crashes every Time it starts.

I tried a higher Magsik, then SavetyNet fails.

You may give me a Hint to grant root permissions for Apps permanently?

When I open a App I point at Permanently permissions. Then I open Magisk Manager, but there ist no App with #Superuser

Thanks and Greetings from Germany!
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
Always I charged to 100%. And used music, internet...

then after 10-20min it go to 99% That I never had.

But after 99% it lost very fast battery alwaxys 2-3Min, 1%

At last I get only 3-4hour screen on

Andy boeffla settings that a user have, that give me more battery life
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Jiimmy97:
It's from latest bootloader and modem I think but with stock kernal i see it's normal i switch now custom rom RR and it lasts 100% for 3 4 hours idle and 30 min when heavy use its not normal and finished too fast so I switched to before latest BL and CP modem.

Regards
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] profet11:
will it work on g900k?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] rabbitoor:
Has anyone tried this ROM with Multirom?

I can install it (with supersu) without any problem but when I want to boot Multirom crashes.

I had this great ROM once installed (but as main ROM) and want it again as battery saving ROM
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Hi everyone!

Recently I was playing a little with different versions of Magisk on DevBase4.6.

Here is my short summary:

1. Magisk 15.3:

-> SafetyNet Check - Passed

-> systemless devbase -> Working properly

2. Magisk 16.0 (latest official):

-> SafetyNet Check - Failed

-> systemless devbase -> Working properly

3. Magisk 16.4 (latest beta):

-> SafetyNet Check - Passed

-> systemless devbase -> Doesn't work

[MENTION=5150393]_alexndr[/MENTION] could you please confirm that Systemless Devbase is not compatible for some reasons with latest Magisk beta ver. 16.4? Thanks
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _alexndr:
It is possible... I have abandoned work on systemless devbase since I bought N8/S9+ and realized that it does not make sense anymore. In changelist for Note 8 you can read:

I do not remember exact Magisk build where it has been removed, but at the moment there is no init.magisk.rc file in the kernel's ramdisk patched by Magisk, so my post-fs-data script probably exits on checking whether Magisk is installed or not (I used this file as a condition)

Also "/magisk" (symlinked) directory has been removed so it fails also at paths containing it in script

At the moment, as a workaround, you can try to edit manually my "000000devbase" post-fs-data script and change conditions of existence "/init.magisk.rc" file to e.g "/sbin/magisk" and change all paths from "/magisk/.core/..." to "/sbin/.core/img/.core/..."

NOTE: It is still possible that I missed something in above thoughts :D
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Thanks for the info and hints. Already edited your script and applied with changes over Magisk 16.4.

It looks like the combination of DevBase14.6(CRA2) Rom + Magisk 16.4 + adjusted SYSTEMLESS DevBase v2.1 works fine now :D
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] lollazzo:
If I want to full debloat the rom, is there an automatic tool?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
Hey guys i test al lof of combination with governor/scheduler and apps but nothing helped really i get only 3:30 Screen on

anyone who have a good setting between battery life/performence
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Dr.N@:
Since the last Bootloader update and Modem to the newest my device turn off between 20-1% after restarting my device has more % and it turn off again. It seems that the bootloader has an error [MENTION=2174044]Many40[/MENTION]
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] pierrebe:
My wife had this problem with her phone. Disappear after the purchase a new battery!
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
My phone have always a wakelock its called

android.core.apps

can anyone help
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xn0live:
i get only 2 hour screen on can anyone see the BBS
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Dr.N@:
[MENTION=5150393]_alexndr[/MENTION] did we get also version 5.8 of your DevBase like Note 4
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] doubledragon5:
Let me see if I get this straight. If coming from a pure stock rom, with latest bootloader, modem.. Do a data wipe only, in stock recovery? What about after installing TWRP.. Do you still wipe system cache delivk/cache?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Everything is described in OP:

1. This rom needs a custom recovery (e.g. TWRP) for installation

2. If you are coming from a stock rom or previous release of this rom you don't need to wipe anything.

3. If are however coming from a custom rom or you insist to perform "clean install" then you should do a factory reset from TWRP.

4. Any other/additional "superwipes" are not recommended.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] lollazzo:
Is it possible to debloat the rom before the flash?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Dr.N@:
Problem sloved i downgrade to Devbas 4.3 QCI6 and now i dont have any power off until the Phone reach 1-2%. The Problem was the CRA2 Bootloader
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Hi,

Very weird. I am on the CRA2 bootloader from the beginning and had no battery issues at all.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Dr.N@:
I read in a Forum that some people has battery issus and other not
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Maurice315:
Hello!

I have a problem with Samsung Browser: it doesn't let me use private mode. Everytime I try to set a password for private mode, it kicks me out.

Anyone with the same bug? Is a problem caused by modded Samsung Browser? I did not install https://xdaforums.com/s7-edge/development/samsung-systemless-devbase-encryption-t3517178 .. if this could be the problem.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] shortcut333:
The best custom rom!
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] j1gga84:
[MENTION=5150393]_alexndr[/MENTION]

New base was released:

BTU -> G900FXXU1CRH1

PDA: G900FXXU1CRH1

CSC: G900FOXA1CRH1

CHANGELIST: 14131106

BUILD DATE: 06.08.2018

Android security patch level: 01.08.2017

https://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/...U1CRH1/233034/

regards
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] lollazzo:
What are the changes?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _alexndr:
OK, I will make CRH1 DevBase v5.9 (yes... many things has changed in the meantime - for more information - see changelist in any of my other device's thread, e.g. here https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=75924773&postcount=3) :cool:

Could somebody confirm if the newest Magisk 17.1 works well with CRH1 build?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
What? No! Samsung, what have you done to me? I am really disappointed. I thought that you stopped stock firmware updates at CRA2 and there will not be updates provided any longer ;) :D.

I stayed quite long time on Devbase 4.6 and spending a lot of time on making dozens of mods which finally met my requirements/expectations but then I became bored so decided do switch to something new -> LOS 15.1 (Oreo 8.1).

And what now? Probably time to switch back to Devbase5.9 (CRH1). Sorry for OT :)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Elcondef:
Please have someone upload the ROM to the mega server ;)

http://live.samsung-updates.com/details/135344/Galaxy_S5_Snapdragon/SM-G900F/BTU/G900FXXU1CRH1.html
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MysteryIII:
Use SamFirm for download.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] noxcrate:
Hello, currently i am using RR Rom. What i should do to change to this rom? Thank you :)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Hi,

You need a clean install.

1. Back up all your important data. There are many ways to do that. You don't need to back up your files in your internal SD card as it will stay untouched.

2. Perform Wipe data/factory reset.

3. Install Devbase 5.9

4. Restore your data.

Remark: Make sure you have corresponding/latest bootloader and modem. If not, you need to flash them from odin in order to avoid any future issues.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Ranniel:
when I was going to install version 5.9 I got an error for the mobile version, in version 4.6 I let it install it in my g900v but it does not let me
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _alexndr:
Model detection works in slightly different way (more accurate) - it checks BL prefix (first 5 characters -> so normally it requires G900F*** model).

... but don't worry - I left a way to flash it in other G900*** models - if you add "skipblcp" string in the ZIP file name (force to skip slashing BL & CP) - detection will be also less accurate (shortened to first 4 characters -> so it will require only a G900*** model) :cool:
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] noxcrate:
How should i know the corresponding/latest bootloader and modem? What is the latest one? Thank you :)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Hi,

1. Install Phone Info app and you will know

2. Don't you mind reading OP before asking? Please see post no.3

Regards
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] oinkoff:
DevBase v5.9 it's any option to install this rom and have 0x0?

I downgrade to 4.4.2

Install root

Install Mobil Odin Pro

Edit file options.prop

root=noroot

xposed=false

And install from Mobil Odin Pro G900FXXU1CRH1_DevBase_v5.9.zip?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Yes it is but under condition that you don't need root. It is not possible on android 6.0.1 to have root with know 0x0.

If you do what you proposed you will have this rom installed with Knox flag untouched but you will lose root at the end.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] oinkoff:
I don't need root. Only 0x0. When I choose OTA / Update ZIP

This is not an OTA/ Update ZIP file ! ZIP file containing partitions are not supported.

It's any option to unstall this rom from Mobile Odin or FlashFire?

EDIT

I install zip in FlashFire and BL_G900FXXU1CRH1.tar, CP_G900FXXU1CQK3.tar in ODIN. After this clear cashe and Wipe data. And phone stuck with blinking Samsung logo.

EDIT2

I installed again BL_G900FXXU1CRH1.tar, CP_G900FXXU1CQK3.tar without wipe and phone go on. I'm testing.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] HJarausch:
Many, many thanks Alexndr. It works just fine with Magix 7.1

Helmut
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] hardalexport:
Many40

And it remains in the old:

Case 1 (default) - install the ROM with Magisk & MagiskSU as root solution

(just flash ZIP file "as it is")

Case 2 - install the ROM with SuperSU as root solution, without Magisk

(place "supersu" string anywhere in the ZIP file name, e.g. "G900Fxxx_DevBase_v5.x_supersu.zip")

Case 3 - do not root device (NOTE: you will get unmodified ROM!)

(place "noroot" string anywhere in the ZIP file name, e.g. "G900Fxxx_DevBase_v5.x_noroot.zip")
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Sorry but could you explain what do you mean by that? :confused:
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] hardalexport:
Many40

This Rom can be renamed as before, that is, for example, only with magisk or supersu or no root? Magisk is installed by default as root solution?

Alexander always had this line, after each of his Rom:

Case 1 (default) - install the ROM with Magisk & MagiskSU as root solution

(just flash ZIP file "as it is")

Case 2 - install the ROM with SuperSU as root solution, without Magisk

(place "supersu" string anywhere in the ZIP file name, e.g. "G900Fxxx_DevBase_v5.x_supersu.zip")

Case 3 - do not root device (NOTE: you will get unmodified ROM!)

(place "noroot" string anywhere in the ZIP file name, e.g. "G900Fxxx_DevBase_v5.x_noroot.zip")

Now why doesn't he write it like he used to. Or I don't understand something.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Hi,

1. Yes,

2. Yes,

3. It is still written in the OP (post no. 1)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] hardalexport:
Many40

Thank you very much for your reply.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] knojap:
Is there a chance to install it on G900T(3)?

Thanks
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] hardalexport:
Many40

And you don't know why alexndr no longer makes SYSTEMLESS DevBase?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Many40:
Yes, I know why - read alexandr's answer to my question which I asked some time ago: https://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=76542508&postcount=7930

By the way, even he stopped making systemless devbase I am still on it :)
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] bbsc:
Why not? But you'll have to strip system.img a little. See the first screenshot.

It's the previous Alexndr's ROM version, I have no time at the moment to prepare the latest for SM-G900T.

@Many40

As far as I remember, we argued with you whether SM-G900T is able to operate on the European LTE bands with this ROM and native firmware.

The answer is on the second screenshot. It's on the B3. And almost the same on B7.

Moreover, SM-G900V operates on B3 as well but obviously it cannot use B7.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] bbsc:
The ROM does not contain bootloader and modem. The third question is answered by Alexndr a page or two backwards.

Simply get an empty system.img from "T", extract Alexndr's system.img, mount both in Linux and copy all the files.

(empty system.img from "T" is attached, be careful, it's highly compressed)

Unmount the images and replace Alexndr's system.img in the ROM's zip-file with your new system.img.

Replace the kernel image (boot.img) too.

That's all, if I remember correctly.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] knojap:
Don't have Linux an hope i will be satisfied withe the above solution...

Thanks

---------- Post added at 11:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:36 AM ----------

Doesn't work with G900T3???

Followed this solution:

... but don't worry - I left a way to flash it in other G900*** models - if you add "skipblcp" string in the ZIP file name (force to skip slashing BL & CP) - detection will be also less accurate (shortened to first 4 characters -> so it will require only a G900*** model)

But:

So, now i can install,l but at the end TWRP says:

Failed to flash system.img -> /dev/block/mmcb1kop24

Error 1

Failed to mount "/system" (Invalid Argument)

So there is no system partition anymore!

So i have to restore my TWRP Backup...

Any help?
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] bbsc:
I don't know how to explain better....

The size of system partition in SM-G900F is 2621440000 bytes.

The size of system partition in SM-G900T/T3 is 2597322752 bytes.

The size of the system.img in Alexndr's ROM is definitely 2621440000 bytes because it's made for the "F" variant.

Writing a bigger image to a smaller partition damages the filesystem of your phone and you have to restore it from a backup or flash a stock fw.

That's why you should make the system.img in the ROM a little shorter. It's possible because there's enough free space on that partition.

But you definitely have to use linux.
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] knojap:
Is there a way to expand the system.img, remove some bloatware, and built a new system.img in windows?

Thank you...
[Galaxy S 5 Android Development (Snapdragon)] bbsc:
Definitely.

Just install VMWare, create a new virtual machine and install Ubuntu on it ;).