yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Original Android Development] :
Fair enough!

Enviado desde mi A0001 usando XDA Forums
[ONE Original Android Development] zando2712:
Franco is Focussed
[ONE Original Android Development] amst3l:
I'm currently running cm-12.1-20150901-SNAPSHOT-YOG4PAO236-bacon which i downloaded here. But when I try to install the kernel it just get stuck in boot. Any help?
[ONE Original Android Development] DerRomtester:
cm12 is not cm12.1
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
Kernel does not work with android 5.1 yet.
[ONE Original Android Development] pranayberry:
Hey Franco can we get any news about franco.Kernel for OnePlus Two.
[ONE Original Android Development] playya:
Guys simply check Op last set of posts to see if he is as you guys ask "still alive" also you may find a response in there on what he is doing or not doing as well. Happy hunting and I assume you know how to review someones posts :good:
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
He's posting more stuff over at his G+ profile than here.
[ONE Original Android Development] playya:
I hope people understand why so many XDA developers are on G+
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
Actually, no. But I honestly don't care as long as it's good for the development.
[ONE Original Android Development] playya:
ok? do some reading up in here and other threads and you will see and as far as good for development I guess it would depend on how you look at things. You take it easy :good:
[ONE Original Android Development] Lidor167:
Main differences between AK's and Franco's please?
[ONE Original Android Development] NickosD:
Ak is compatible with the newer roms. What else?

Sent from my bacon!!!!!
[ONE Original Android Development] Raagh:
Ak features diferent hotplugs governors and special features. Franco is more like a flash and forget kernel. Also ak kernel suports 5.1.1 while franco doesnt
[ONE Original Android Development] vicky2131:
franco kernel doesnt need any extra tweaks. It will optimize itself wrt cpu's.

Ak is like a trail and error method. You need to find your own tweaks and settings and might change from user to user(like it has all the tweaking a kernel should have) even franco has but franco's kernel is pre tweaked ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] superiscch:
Biggest: AK is still active on OPO...
[ONE Original Android Development] rzrv8:
Franco...? :(
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
He's active on XDA, just "too busy" to reply, or simply not willing to say goodbye.. It takes two too many seconds of his time.. But hey, free development for a while..

Bye [MENTION=1810311]francofrancisco[/MENTION]
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
Lol. Chill. He just updated the Nexus6 kernel to Marshmallow. He already told on his G+ that he WILL update the Oneplus One kernel.
[ONE Original Android Development] joefso:
yes he told that also 3-4 months ago about L, but not to ask for ETA´s ofcourse loll! Best to move on. Most major custom roms are ditching CM anyway and are moving to CAF AOSP, meaning the derivate kernel images will most likely not be compatible. Franco never seemed happy with CM anyway and called them morons after CM decided to put the midle finger to everyone and mix AOSP with CAF in the most obsene way possible. So not to worry a lot of good things are coming.

Bit OT, but we as a community need devs to collaborate more. Everyone is doing his own thing and that is fine but having everyone work on the same problem together is better than each working soley on it, this has more cons than pros
[ONE Original Android Development] S4turno:
I don't think it's right to criticize developers like this for not updating the content they give us for free.

Yes, it's annoying when there is no updates, when bugs don't get fixed, when new Android versions are not supported, but again... we are not paying for anything. If you don't like or aren't too happy, just move to another kernel, develop your own, or go back to the old and buggy software provided by Oneplus. Easy.

I'm not a developer, but if I was, I would think two times before releasing something to the public. It's like you have the responsibility to update, add functionality and provide support 24/7, all for free. This is not good and probably it's one of the reasons for some devs not helping more the community.
[ONE Original Android Development] svnhvn:
Exactly like my thought.
[ONE Original Android Development] gparmar76:
Not that I care if Franco updates this kernel or not, I'm sure there are people who paid him via his kernel app to support him...and now are **** out of luck...so I have to agree with those who are looking for updates.
[ONE Original Android Development] :
I'm sure there are people who paid for his Kernel as well, "franco.Kernel updater" app in play store, doesn't come for free.
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
Holy ****, that's more like a donation. Also, you can use that app for other kernels too
[ONE Original Android Development] :
Yep we can, the design is pretty cool and very easy to use, but there are free stuff too like Kernel Auditor for example, which gives all the goodies and for free. For me, I'm using boeffla kernel for about a year now, and never had I felt like using anything other than boeffla config app. So, my point is, if people have paid for it, either there should be an update or they should have an option to refund, though I'm not their lawyer, shouldn't poke my nose on that, but it just makes sense to me.
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
This is wrong, it's "buying" an app, not a kernel. You donated for development, granted, but there were no promises made. The app itself also had a free version, just like Boeffla has a donate key as well.. We get frustrated to see something we love go away, definitely, but it's not fair to developers to say they owe anyone anything. This is a hobby, free time donated for us to enjoy.
[ONE Original Android Development] svnhvn:
$5, for two year (using Mako) and now you ask for refund? Whoaa.. That's a new level of act cheap.
[ONE Original Android Development] Nichie:
Writing in to Microsoft nao to demand refund for win2k and winxp since they stopped updating it.

And also all the handphone companies that didn't update the roms on their phones.
[ONE Original Android Development] hitardo:
If you paid, you paid because you liked the development that was in place at that time.

Not because you expect more and more development.

Besides, how much did you paid? How much do you imagine he got (after taxes, Google's cut) for all the app purchases?

Is that enough to pay rent, food and live?

He is like us: he needs money to live a decent life.

So, I will assume this is not his main job, just because he needs money to have a normal life.

Of course I am disappointed this kernel is not updated regularly, and it sure looks like it is abandoned.

But I do not have the right to demand support for the rest of the phone's life or CM's support for this device.

Just because he did not sign a contract with me, nor promised me support for life.

So... Chill :)

Otherwise, look for another kernel.

Or even do what I did: look for other options.

I kept stock kernel and installed the XPosed framework and use Performance Profile module to adapt the system to my use.

Of course franco.kernel is better.

But I already lived before knowing him and his work...
[ONE Original Android Development] superiscch:
Why is this topic getting bumped every time with the same discussion. It's clear Franco has stopped on the OPO.

Just leave this topic to sink away.
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
Yeah. I'll survive with 5.0 on my OPO until his next device.
[ONE Original Android Development] AmyClaraRose:
Franco hasn't stopped if you check his g+ he posted on it about kernel few days ago

---------- Post added at 19:21 ---------- Previous post was at 19:18 ----------

https://plus.google.com/+FranciscoFranco1990/posts/iqSVxQimKm8
[ONE Original Android Development] hitardo:
To sum it up:

"One Plus One: Support for the COS 12.1 will be added sometime from now up to the next 2 weeks. Same priority as the Nexus 5"

"Nexus 5: FK for this device will be released sometime from now up to the next 2 weeks"

"Kernel work has been kinda secondary lately, which is normal considering I've been doing it for lots of years and I needed a little break from all the things Root."

in https://plus.google.com/+FranciscoFranco1990/posts/iqSVxQimKm8

Cheers!
[ONE Original Android Development] FloorFox:
Brace yourself. New version of fk is coming!
[ONE Original Android Development] superiscch:
Not the first time I read this...

Would be nice it there was M support and not only cos12.1
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
M support would be reliant on a COS build of Marshmallow, as he only supports official ROMs..
[ONE Original Android Development] kewinhdorff:
how is this kernel :) ? there is not much in the OP to read hehe.. like features and stuff like battery and all those kind of things
[ONE Original Android Development] Mayex:
Sultan is the new Franco for opo
[ONE Original Android Development] zarrar@live.in:
xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/development/ported-miui6-version-5-5-17-based-color-t3113217

i am on miui7 rom from this link. is the kernel compatible with it?
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
You're incredibly lazy. I don't even know how to define, my words are lacking
[ONE Original Android Development] ghul21:
Some good news

https://plus.google.com/+FranciscoFranco1990/posts/QSDABfWU2q6

Wysłane z mojego ONE A2003 przy użyciu Tapatalka
[ONE Original Android Development] fgaurano:
Nice! I thought he already left us :o
[ONE Original Android Development] sneakerspark:
About time I switched back to COS 12.1. :p
[ONE Original Android Development] yot2703:
Kernel is dead?
[ONE Original Android Development] NickosD:
Yes

Sent from my bacon!!!!!
[ONE Original Android Development] Vekhez:
no?

https://plus.google.com/+FranciscoFranco1990/posts/d54hgv5S6Hw (in comments)

there is supposed to be an update (doesn't specify CM13, COS12.1.1, etc) within the next 24ish hours.
[ONE Original Android Development] grilopt:
Was it 240ish hours?! :rolleyes:
[ONE Original Android Development] Vekhez:
Who knows, he said that he would release one before the first week of 2016 is over, and it's been much longer and people have called him out on it and [MENTION=3292224]franciscofranco[/MENTION] is just "choosing not to reply". Might be due to the bring-up from CM12.0 to CM12.1, or CM13, or maybe even the conversion to CAF (although I seriously doubt it)..
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
At this point in regards to [MENTION=3292224]franciscofranco[/MENTION] no one really knows. He usually makes kernels for Stock ROM only on all devices he makes kernels for, so I would expect a release for COS12.1.1. I've also been waiting for his kernel cause I purchased his app ages ago and it works best with his kernel but we'll just have to wait till he decides to release and hope he stops procrastinating or whatever he's doing when it's been like a year since his last kernel.
[ONE Original Android Development] Vekhez:
Yeah but then he also started releasing Lollipop builds for the CM12 nightlies on the OPO when it was still on official CM11S.. so he may do a CM13 kernel based on that regard, who actually knows.
[ONE Original Android Development] hitardo:
I sincerely think that making a kernel for CyanogenOS 12.1 is a mistake.

And I doubt that francisco.franco will do it.

He must be messing with CyanogenMod 13 nightlies for the OnePlus One and testing it.

The release of the kernel will be dependent on the release of CyanogenOS 13, and later the proper adjustments and testing of the shift between CyanogenMod 13 and CyanogenOS 13.

This is my opinion, because this is what I would do in his situation.

So, we have to keep waiting.

Besides, the phone is very good, stable and battery friendly.

The touch problems are gone.

Of course franco.kernel would be awesome, and I am here waiting for it.

But, I prefer a good and lasting option, than a fast and soon old one.
[ONE Original Android Development] Galaali:
[MENTION=3292224]franciscofranco[/MENTION] where are you? I miss your kernel. It was a beast on CM11s and CM12s...
[ONE Original Android Development] Kausthub:
Is there any build for cm13 and derivatives???
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
No. That's why most switched to Nexus phones, where he still develops his kernels.
[ONE Original Android Development] Gurkex3:
Any news you can share with us Franco?
[ONE Original Android Development] NickosD:
If you are buying a phone just because you want to use a developer's work, then you are stupid.

Sent from my bacon!!!!!
[ONE Original Android Development] acuicultor:
Stupid why? Everybody is free to spend his money on whatever he wants. I personally never use stock roms although sometimes they are the most stable but thats my way and because of that im stupid?? I usually have various devices and enjoy to try new roms always and never will buy a device with closed sources.

Enviado desde mi A0001 mediante Tapatalk
[ONE Original Android Development] hitardo:
Strange comment coming from a person that visits the XDA forum.

Yes, there are many people that buy a phone just because of development.

Nexus is an example, OnePlus One is another, Samsung has its followers, like Sony, HTC, LG among others.

Or, for example, people that will buy the same phone as DorimanX, just because his kernel is awesome, with plenty of support. Just see its thread on XDA

here

, with the LG G2 kernel, and you will see why: he debugs each logcat sent to him and fixes the problem if it is kernel related.

My LG G2 is faster than ever.

So, be careful when calling "stupid" - or any "bad name" - to some one else.

Just because it can back-fire you.
[ONE Original Android Development] Spl4tt:
Not really. I feel my phone is pretty useless without proper development. I always stick with the phone where my favourite devs are.

Development for me is more important than the hardware of the device.
[ONE Original Android Development] Gurkex3:
Any news due to COS 13 release next week?
[ONE Original Android Development] joefso:
forget about franco kernel for opo
[ONE Original Android Development] Gurkex3:
Naaaa..he cleary stated big news for the Bacon are about to come up a few weeks ago. *nervously rubbing my fingers"

LET ME LIVE IN MY DREAM CASTLE
[ONE Original Android Development] joefso:
cool. :cool:

After reading your last sentence I imagined what it must feel like for a parent to tell his young childeren that santa does not exist anymore.

But there you go... cheers!
[ONE Original Android Development] Raagh:
I really think that he is probably waiting for cos13 which is gonna be released in march. It is a waste of energy start working on a kernel for 5.1.1 right now
[ONE Original Android Development] Vekhez:
Maybe Cyanogen got him to make the kernel for COS13, now that's a far fetched idea.
[ONE Original Android Development] Raagh:
https://plus.google.com/+FranciscoFranco1990/posts/GS5vVZMDcx6

i was wrong. 5.1.1 kernel almost ready :)
[ONE Original Android Development] Bobbi lim:
Guess we will be seeing a 5.1.1 kernel but until then, I'm staying on 5.0.2 :p
[ONE Original Android Development] Galaali:
It is recommended, to stay with an old version without stagefright updates? I think i stay with jgcaaps CM13 rom till franco releases his kernel :p
[ONE Original Android Development] Bobbi lim:
Honest, I understand how "dangerous" stagefright can be but honestly, which android user has been affected by it yet? Furthermore, just to prevent me from being vulnerable, I just have to be careful :p
[ONE Original Android Development] agstn.tanmay:
whats the current status of franko kernel for oneplus one???any update??any new build for android 5.1 for one plus??
[ONE Original Android Development] DerRomtester:
1. dont ask for ETA

2. check google plus
[ONE Original Android Development] atulclassic:
no update and never will be since franko is not interested anymore in OPO development
[ONE Original Android Development] Vekhez:
Clearly you aren't keeping up with Google Plus, while there isn't a build up and I wouldn't be waiting for one, Franco has released screenshots of it and said that it is coming and when he is done with it he will release it. And yes, his name is franco not franko.
[ONE Original Android Development] atulclassic:
that he is saying since ages..keep waiting
[ONE Original Android Development] svnhvn:
Just get out from this thread if you don't have something's beneficial to say man.
[ONE Original Android Development] Hzu:
A lot of people are just being paranoid over nothing.

Back on topic, does the current kernel works on CM12S? Still going through the thread but would be very helpful if someone could just tell me.

EDIT: Just realised there's COS12.1, is there? So COS12 should work with r43 just fine, yes?
[ONE Original Android Development] atulclassic:
this shows your frustration of waiting..:laugh::laugh::laugh:
[ONE Original Android Development] Vekhez:
There is COS12 which is 5.0.2 based, and r43 works with that. r44 is going to work with COS12.1.1 (5.1.1) but hasn't been released yet.
[ONE Original Android Development] Hzu:
Yeah, noticed that. That's the only reason I'm coming back to COS. I'm glad Franco is still working on this device. Probably not gonna see a 6.X kernel anytime soon until COS13 is officially released for this device.
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
Actually you seem to be the one whose frustrated and felt the need to resurrect this thread to whine ? sorry bro its gonna be ok [emoji23]
[ONE Original Android Development] svnhvn:
This is me showing my sickening of your behaviour. Hhh.. Kid with Internet.
[ONE Original Android Development] FloorFox:
End this pointless discussion. This thread is dead.
[ONE Original Android Development] Gurkex3:
And who are you to put your self over Franco himself, who clearly stated an update on his personal G+?
[ONE Original Android Development] superiscch:
More reason to acknowledge that this THREAD is dead. ;)
[ONE Original Android Development] Vekhez:
If you've never looked at this Google+, it's where sends most of his updates and such. He talks about all his supported kernels and devices. Probably just a more streamline way to talk about whatever since he doesn't have to jump from thread to thread for different devices and apps.
[ONE Original Android Development] agstn.tanmay:
dude just check the G+ community,franco posted his kernel update supported to android 5.1.1,i know its awkward,becauseits marsmalow time but still makes a sence,and i think its abest kernel too (y)
[ONE Original Android Development] tankhood:
Just flash other kernels
[ONE Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
Here's r44 for CyanogenOS 12.1.1 (latest build). It should also work in any Lollipop custom rom based on that tree.

http://kernels.franco-lnx.net/OnePlusOne/5.1/anyKernel/

Flash it on your recovery. I also updated the OP.

Before you ask:

* Yes, I'll update it to COS 13.0 when it's released. I won't take 1 year to do it this time

* No I won't release anything for CM13.0

* No I won't release anything for DumbOxygenOS

If you're a FKUpdater user you'll probably have to update to a newer version (sometime today) to allow for auto-flash.

Sorry for taking this long.
[ONE Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
It was just an issue on my server file name, FKUpdater is now downloading just fine.
[ONE Original Android Development] deepaklunked:
thanks a lott [MENTION=3292224]franciscofranco[/MENTION]. this shows you havent forgotten the bacon users. will definitely install cos12.1.1 just to use your kernel..
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
You changed format from boot.img to any kernel.. Was this for comparability?.. Any loss from not having your ramdisk?
[ONE Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
For compatibility and less ****ery for the end-user. No loss at all, I can still apply ramdisk changes with anyKernel2 format by [MENTION=4544860]osm0sis[/MENTION]
[ONE Original Android Development] Gurkex3:
OP delivers. Thank you so much Franco. Holy damn..
[ONE Original Android Development] DerRomtester:
Is your source already online?

is your thermal driver inside?

Are all cores online by default like on nexus 6 ?
[ONE Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
1 - source is online of course

2 - nah, using the default thermal core. thermal-engine is heavily customised by CM, I didn't see the need for using my simple thermal algorithm. Unless someone tells me the defaults throttle too soon or too heavy, but I leave that feedback to you users to tell me

3 - nope, it's using the default mpdecision (also heavily customised by CM) - I liked how it behaves so I didn't touch it. Unless there's complains about it I don't see the need to **** with it
[ONE Original Android Development] sash89:
Francooooooooooooo
[ONE Original Android Development] inzaghi89:
Not sure that this is only me but I'm unable to create a backup in fku.

Can someone share with their configuration for Franco kernel?

Wytapane na Oposie.
[ONE Original Android Development] Setting.Out:
Reboot while watching YouTube..
[ONE Original Android Development] Bobbi lim:
So no Mako Hotplug but Mpdecision instead? O.o

Won't our battery life take a hit?
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
Why don't you test it out a couple days before jumping to conclusions? There's per app modes in FKU its working perfectly at the moment
[ONE Original Android Development] Bobbi lim:
As stated by Franco "3 - nope, it's using the default mpdecision (also heavily customised by CM) - I liked how it behaves so I didn't touch it. Unless there's complains about it I don't see the need to **** with it" just the previous page and anyone can infer that it doesn't sound like Mako Hotplug is being used but it's CM's Mpdecision instead and I'm not jumping to conclusions yet as I haven't tested the kernel and thus my question was if its using Mpdecision instead of Mako Hotplug, won't battery take a hit?
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
Exactly you're trying to make a judgement call on battery life without giving it a try, Mpdecision can still be modified and I'm sure Franco has tested it thoroughly. I've been using it a couple hours with per apps for games so can't give you a definitive answer but I'll update this post later if you're interested for some stats. But even if I get great battery life might not be the same for you so best answer is try it and you'll know
[ONE Original Android Development] Stroky:
But interesting is that franco uses the same behaviour like the Nexus 6 on the Nexus 5 and on the One he decided to use the stock solution.
[ONE Original Android Development] Bobbi lim:
Franco knows his kernel best and thus the question was directed at him plus I'm quite curious to find out why he chose to stick with Mpdecision instead of Mako as I got quite impressive battery life on Mako hotplug :D Kudos to you Franco! 7hrs of SOT + 30+hr of standby is no easy feat!
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
https://github.com/franciscofranco/one_plus_one/commits/cm-12.1

Here's a link to his changes if you're curious. It's performing wonderfully. Also you can't specify the number of CPU cores for per app modes now cause of Mpdecision but it still works well, not noticing heat during games
[ONE Original Android Development] DerRomtester:
How can you modify a closed source binary file?
[ONE Original Android Development] Renosh:
No idea flar2 managed to do it and make some interesting changes on N5 elemental kernel
[ONE Original Android Development] MBurns2:
sorry guys but what is "cos 13" ? it is different from cm 13 roms here on xda ?

Thanks a lot
[ONE Original Android Development] NickosD:
It's the official stock rom. CyanogenOS 13
[ONE Original Android Development] merothh:
I'm sorry for slight ooftopic but still..I thought I saw a January cm12.1 snapshot for bacon..but now I can't find..does something like that exist ??
[ONE Original Android Development] Bobbi lim:
This kernel does not work for CM12.1 snapshot. It works only on COS12.1.1 for the latest release of the kernel ;)