yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Ashutos1997:
https://mega.co.nz/#!c4twBSIC!uQY-9MNhe1d79pAwEvfJAHeg2pZ6fuwbfs3ABHx3Pks

Thanks to Carlos Manuel : http://xdaforums.com/member.php?u=4022928
[Samsung Gear 2 Neo] best97:
Hi,

Today I bring you a video tutorial that I did for those of you who need it. Video showing how to Root Samsung Gear 2 and Gear 2 Neo:

[YOUTUBE]2SMRRTmaVOY[/YOUTUBE]

ALL credits to the member fibs for the tutorial and his post:

Fibs' post

If you like the video you can subscribe to my channel for more Gear 2 videos!

TM Videos
[Samsung Gear 2 Neo] scrappydoo26:
unroot

would be excellent hi thanks good video of a video unroot ta we can not be modified by this update is the message that I get with loso check for updates ...
[Samsung Gear 2 Neo] JimSmith94:
Just reinstall a stock ROM with Odin to remove root.
[Samsung Gear 2 Neo] scrappydoo26:
ok thanks very true.: Bueno:
[Samsung Gear 2 Neo] Acedooncoon:
Now that we have root...how do i change my ringtones and notification?
[Samsung Gear 2 Neo] Pattyhuff:
Installing App Problem

I installed one app and mine started doing the same thing. I deleted the app and reset the watch and all is well. I only install one app at a time now.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] belle_lune:
Someone can tell me how can i install WM5 for Qtek 2020

Qtek2020

Version ROM 1.66.02FRA

Date ROM 02/23/04

Version radio 1.10.00

Version proto... 1337.18

Version ExtROM 1.66.142

Now my Qtek use WM2003 FR version 4.20.0 (Build 13252)

I don't hack anything...

I'm noob...

Plz help step by sept... thx so much....
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] belle_lune:
Nobody can help me?????????:confused:

Plz....!!!:( :( :(
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] dotfred:
When you download a rom upgrade, you will find a text file read_this_first.

Well read it first! :p

Then ask questions for parts you didn't understand well.

And read this too:

http://buzzdev.net/index.php?option=com_phorum&Itemid=125&phorum_query=read,26,6594,page=1
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] belle_lune:
Thx! But i can't to find the mode bootloader. Can u help me :confused: . If it need download, plz give me the link... i searched but not found.

thx u so much!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] Rudegar:
he knows

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=280119
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] belle_lune:
ok, it donne right now... thx so much ;)

But i cant connect by ActiveSync. It need drive. I have the CD install original but i cant find drive in this. Someone can give me the drive for Qtek 2020, WM5.

Thx!!!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] Rudegar:
it dont need the pda cd if it needs a cd it would be windows
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] belle_lune:
But i can't find on the Internet... Can i help me... Plz:(
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] dotfred:
Can you tell us what happens when you put the pda in its craddle?

Do you see any error message about an unknown device ?

Be more specific about the problems...

Cheers,

.Fred
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] belle_lune:
I get it ... thx so much everybody...... ;) ;) ;)
[Galaxy Tab S General] rodrigorajao:
I was quite surprised to learn that the Tab S series of tablets ships with the aging Snapdragon 800. I find it's a bit out of place on a tablet where all other specs are top notch. The reviews I read specifically say the tabet can be sluggish at times when more CPU power is required.

I guess I hold out on my upgrade a bit longer then...
[Galaxy Tab S General] meboy:
Only the LTE versions come with the Snapdragon 800. Wi-fi gets the Exynos 5420.
[Galaxy Tab S General] Buckster76:
how is the 5420 ?

I'm kind of disappointed the UK versions have the 5420 - I find my Snapdragon 800 in my Note 3 phone super quick

is the 5420 just as snappy ? Looks such a good screen on the 8.4 and 10.5 Tab S
[Galaxy Tab S General] meboy:
Reviewers are saying the 5420 wi-fi versions are noticeably faster than the 800 in the LTE. I believe benchmarks show the same.
[Galaxy Tab S General] xRevilatioNx:
The 5420 is amazing. Uses all 8 cores at the same time if needed now. They fixed the memory dump issue found in the previous iteration as well.

The only thing I'm bummed about, is the 5433 ( coming out soon)destroys Snapdragon's 805 SoC .... In benchmarks. I wish that processor was in the new Samsung flagship device. Ugh.
[Galaxy Tab S General] harsaphes:
According to all the reviews I have read the opposite is true and they are recommending the processor in

the LTE version as the faster of the two.

I have to run to work but quick google search..Engadget ( which I hate) has this to say..

"If it's any consolation, the as-yet-unreleased LTE models are supposed to use a Snapdragon 800 chip instead of the Exynos 5, so maybe performance will be snappier there."
[Galaxy Tab S General] ncguy68:
Snapdragon seems to get the most development too.
[Galaxy Tab S General] metaldood:
Anandtech clearly said Samsung made a poor choice with Exynos. They should have gone 801 or 805.
[Galaxy Tab S General] Buckster76:
oh well - and 16gb too for UK version - grrrr

still prob going to get one though

maybe it will handle streaming video better than the Snapdragon (well the implementation of it on the Note 3) - after lots of updates, I still can't get smooth streamed video on my Note 3 - youtube, netflix, Sky, Iplayer etc - yet download to phone first (latter 2) - or play local content and smooth as silk
[Galaxy Tab S General] Caelrie:
There probably won't be a 32gb version. Samsung said there'd be a 32gb 8.4 pro and there never was.
[Galaxy Tab S General] arbiskar:
I can confirm there are LTE versions with Exynos processor, at least mine is so, bought in Spain (10.5"). I could change it for a snapdragon version though, but I'm not sure if it is worth it.
[Galaxy Tab S General] Freakstyler:
Thanks for your confirmation arbiskar.

It was rumoured the Tab S would be 5420 for WiFi, and 5420 + Intel LTE Modem for LTE models, that seems to coincide with the reports such as yours, that the LTE models is Exynos based only.

I doubt that Snapdragon based LTE models of the Tab S exist, if the LTE model you purchased is 5420, I'm going to assume they all will be...

Model numbers other than the T700, T705, T800 and T805 would need to exist for Snapdragon variants, so I don't believe we will see Qualcomm chips in any of the Tab S models.

Thanks.
[Galaxy Tab S General] Svendrae:
Hi,

I ordered a LTE Tab S, in germany it will release on friday the 11 July. Before I ordered I thought all versions will have the Exynos 5 Octa and perhaps an optional LTE Modem. After my order I saw that the LTE version will be a QSD 800 :(

Now you say thete will be LTE and Octa. Is it real? Do you know what version Samsung will sell in germay? I think I have to wait a few weeks before I get my tab S because I bought it with a LTE Contract and the Provider cant give me an info when they get the hardware from Samsung.

Now I don`t know if I should cancel the order and buy me a wifi version because the octa is better or will the QSD 800 ok too?
[Galaxy Tab S General] simacca:
The sd800 is slightly better than the octacore, so I wouldn't worry.
[Galaxy Tab S General] rankman2004:
is it confirmed the LTE version in US is also Exynos processor instead of snapdragon 800? Thanks
[Galaxy Tab S General] simacca:
No. Lte is Snapdragon only. Samsung only announced today a new exynos processor with Lte for future products.
[Galaxy Tab S General] Mithrandir007:
Apparently, some people here have the LTE version with Exynos, so I'm not so sure.

They announced a new Exynos processor with LTE integrated for future products, but that doesn't mean there isn't a LTE chip in addition to the Exynos SOC in the Tab S LTE versions.

It would be nice if someone could confirm.

I'm also waiting to see if there will be a 32GB.. and which version to get ;)
[Galaxy Tab S General] simacca:
Would like to see some proof of that. Check out link below.

http://www.gsmarena.com/exynos_modap_is_first_samsung_chipset_with_integrated_lte-news-9006.php
[Galaxy Tab S General] BarryH_GEG:
Someone from Spain said s/he has an Exynos/LTE device. The Spain Samsung site also has the LTE version listed as Exynos.

The announcement yesterday was for a quad-core chip with integrated LTE, not the 5433 next-gen big.LITTLE chip everyone was expecting. Without knowing the GPU of the chip announced yesterday it's hard to say where in the fold it fits (high-end, low-end). There's nothing that's ever prevented Samsung from using Exynos with a stand-alone modem it's just that S-800 with its integrated modem is cheaper. Maybe that's what they're doing in Spain. That or it's a typo and the aforementioned owner "thinks" s/he has Exynos LTE. Everything I've read indicates the S' are using the same S-800/5420 architecture of all Samsung's previously released high-end tablets. So I'm going with typo until someone posts a CPU-Z (available in Play) read out which will say specifically what chip a device is using.

We know there are S-800 SM-T805's because reviewers have tested them. It would be extremely odd that Samsung would give the same model number (Spain's SM-T805 also) to two devices with totally different architectures. They never have before. At a minimum they'd append a letter to it (EG: the N10.1-14 LTE with 700MHz bands sold in Latin America is the "P-SM605M."

As for S-800 being long in tooth, it's not really. The CPU is more than adequate for the workload. Here's a slide from Qualcomm saying 85% of apps don't use two cores better yet four. And the majority of apps never leave the A7 core on 5420.

The challenge is the enormous amount of pixels being pushed on large QHD tablet displays. S-801 uses Adreno 330 just like S-800 so until some SoC with a more powerful GPU is released (released = shipped in a production product) Adreno/Mali is the best we've got and the differences between them performance wise aren't that significant (Mali's about 10% weaker than Adreno when maxed out).
[Galaxy Tab S General] pentsi:
New member here.

Received today my Tab S 8.4 LTE (SM-T705) sold here in Finland. And it is indeed an Exynos 5420.

I don't have a Micro-SIM card for it yet, but it certainly is the LTE version. Does someone know how to check the LTE chip version?

Took captures with CPU Z, but I can't apparently post outside links yet. See them here: pentsin.portaali.org/samsung/ along a photo of the box also claiming 1.9GHz Quad-Core + 1.3GHz Quad-Core.
[Galaxy Tab S General] BarryH_GEG:
Thanks for that. It really is odd that Samsung would move the LTE S' to Exynos - it's not like there's a performance benefit. In addition to the higher cost for a non-integrated modem there's the issue of packaging and heat. I guess the latter two don't matter much in a tablet. But they could have gone this route starting last November with the N10.1-14 if they wanted to. Maybe they didn't want to have to support the AMOLED display on two GPU's (Adreno and Mali) or there was some benefit Mali presented (to AMOLED) that Adreno didn't? I guess we'll never know for sure.

Thanks for sharing the pics...
[Galaxy Tab S General] Freakstyler:
The new chip is integrated on die, the LTE on the Tab S is an Intel Cat6 modem, but not on the same die. Intel have been pushing there modems to Samsung very cheaply in the last 6 months.

Samsung have been wanting to ship more Exynos chips in there own products, cut down on the reliance of Qualcomm.

So it's a Win, Win for Samsung.
[Galaxy Tab S General] rankman2004:
seems it is confirmed that the Galaxy Tab S LTE model outside north America is samsung Exynos processor, but it is strange that it show the galaxy tab S LTE using the Snapdragon 800 Processor in qualcomm website

http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/tablets-pcs/samsung-galaxy-tab-s-105-lte#

Hence I still doubt if the LTE model in US will use the S800, seems no one here can confirm this
[Galaxy Tab S General] AndreiLux:
The Qualcomm versions are the T807 and T707 and are exclusive to CDMA carriers like Verizon.
[Galaxy Tab S General] dmunjal:
That's the real reason why Samsung is dependent on Qualcomm for the US. Only Qualcomm does CDMA for Verizon and Sprint.

I wonder if the new Intel LTE chip supports AT&T and TMobile bands.
[Galaxy Tab S General] BarryH_GEG:
Tablets are probably sold 70% Wi-Fi/30% LTE. High-end phones are sold probably about 70% LTE/30% not. Samsung sold 89M smartphones in Q1 and 11.2M tablets. To substitute Exynos for S-800 they had to introduce another architecture, develop a new PCB, and stock additional parts in their service centers for repairs.

Here's the BOM for the SGS4 in HSPA and LTE form.

Even if the LTE modem for Exynos was the same price as the HSPA version the BOM costs would still be the same or close. And if this decision were purely financial or to pump up sales at Samsung Semiconductor they would have made a volume device like the SGS5 Exynos/LTE. I have no idea what prompted the switch but it doesn't (at least to me) seem as simple as saving a few bucks; especially on such a low volume product.
[Galaxy Tab S General] AndreiLux:
Those numbers are estimates and not factual prices. The Exynos is cheaper.
[Galaxy Tab S General] BarryH_GEG:
Even more reason to have done what they just did (Exynos/LTE) in a high-volume device like the SGS5 rather than a tablet (8.4/10.5 S w/LTE) that'll probably sell 10M units (optimistically) in a year. It's interesting that the CDMA devices are still using S-800. Even though they'll sell in far fewer quantity it's still a reason to have left the S' on S-800 and not have to tool for and support another model.

What's your take on this?

When processing pictures or multimedia from memory to display panel, the Mobile Image Compression (MIC) function inside the newest Exynos 5 Octa family successfully lowers the total system power. Through this feature, you would experience the maximized usage hours of mobile devices with a high-resolution display such as WQXGA (2500x1600), in particular when browsing the web or doing multimedia application requiring the frequent screen refresh.

http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/minisite/Exynos/products5octa_5420.html​

​

There was an interview with a Samsung SLI engineer that I can't find again where he talked more about it. In addition to battery savings (which the S' need desperately on whites) he talked about greatly improved screen refresh rates. He discussed it as a big advantage over Snapdragon. Maybe (finally) there's something in Exynos that the higher demand (guess) big AMOLED display's benefit from. I guess we'll see when the North America S-800 LTE devices come out whether there's any performance or battery life differences compared to their global Exynos/LTE brethren.

The change could be financial as some of you guys are saying but I'm not quite there yet. Samsung LSI (the chip group) generated $4B in revenue last quarter. The mobile group generated $33B and 50% of the Samsung Group's profit. Samsung Group could have told the mobile division to favor Exynos (to boost overall Group sales and profits) year's ago but never did. Why now? And why on tablets that make up 30% of 25% of the sales volume of Samsung's phones? We'll probably never know for sure.
[Galaxy Tab S General] Freakstyler:
Samsung could likely not produce anywhere near enough Exynos chips to satisfy demand of a large global flagship rollout, like the S5.

When they have the capacity and ability to use their own chips, they will.

I believe it's the Intel XMM 7260 modem.
[Galaxy Tab S General] dmunjal:
From the datasheet it looks it's global LTE.

http://www.intel.com/newsroom/kits/mobileworld/2014/pdfs/7260_factsheet.pdf

Does anyone know a vendor who ships to the US who has the S LTE?
[Galaxy Tab S General] Nutsonfire:
For what it's worth, I have both the Tab Pro 8.4 and 10.1 and I find that with the stock ROM the 10.1 runs better than the 8.4. The 8.4 might be a little snappier but the 10.1 feels smoother, less jittery screen etc. Both with Google now launcher and lots of Samsung apps disabled.
[Galaxy Tab S General] AndreiLux:
Snapdragons need to run a double width display interface to be able to run QHD screens, the Exynos doesn't. Don't have numbers, but this affect power consumption, it's correct.
[Galaxy Tab S General] fjpadilla:
tab s sm-t805 lte with exynoss

I bought my tablet yesterday ( Spain ) and can confirm that this lte has exynoss octa

I used cpu-z to check it, but I don't know how to post images
[Galaxy Tab S General] TheGoD:
Could also just be that the yield-rate for the Exynos was worse when the S5 decision was made compared to the Tab S concept phase and / or the already secured a stable pricing from Qualcom than the projected cost per Exynos SOC.
[Galaxy Tab S General] enaybee:
I have US WiFI 8.4 with Exynos chip and I can tell you with no issues that no matter what the benchmarks are saying. But stock TW runs like crap on this chip. There is stutter, jitter, lag everwhere. Chrome is almost useless because scrolling is pre-gingerbread style. TW ate all the butter KitKat had to offer. I am sure it would be same on Snapdragon 800 too.

Hence the reason I put BLCK CM11 on it and its like day and night. Now I can say that this is smooth and I love it.
[Galaxy Tab S General] kenkiller:
I dunno. I see TW running pretty smoothly on SD based phones like S4/S5. Even the QHD S5 Prime runs good.
[Galaxy Tab S General] Sam K:
I went to a Samsung Experience store and downloaded and ran Antutu benchmark app on both the Galaxy Tab S 8.4 with an Exynos 5 Octa and 3gb RAM and the Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 with a Snapdragon 800 and 2gb RAM. The Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 with the Snapdragon scored much higher than the Galaxy Tab S 8.4 with the Exynos. I wish I had written down the scores or taken screen shots and emailed them to myself.

Anyway, I want to buy a Galaxy Tab S 8.4 with the Snapdragon 800 (which as someone pointed out is listed on Qualcomm's website) but I can't seem to find it at any online store. Does anyone know if there was a version of the Galaxy Tab S 8.4 with the Snapdragon 800 ever released? If so, what's the model number and where can I get it?

(On a side note Samsung should have used the Snapdragon 801 instead of the Snapdragon 800 in the Galaxy Tab S if it actually exists because from what I've read the 800 can be easily swapped out for the 801. Since the Galaxy Tab S was released after the Galaxy Tab Pro and is supposed to be better than the Galaxy Tab Pro then they should have included the newer Snapdragon 801 processor.)
[Galaxy Tab S General] ap27:
I believe only the Sprint/Verizon LTE versions of the Tab S have the SD800
[Galaxy Tab S General] Sam K:
Yeah but I want the 8.4 not the 10.5. I believe they're only selling the 10.5.
[Galaxy Tab S General] dannstarr:
UK lte version here, with exynos
[Galaxy Tab S General] Sam K:
I'd love to see how the Antutu benchmark of the Exynos 5 in Galaxy Tab S compares to a device with a Snapdragon 801, 3gb RAM and a 2K display like LG G3. The score difference should be even larger.
[Android Auto General] sykozylot:
Hey folks. Apologies if this is in the wrong area. Now that Android Auto is announced (http://www.android.com/auto/), I know there are lots of folks with Windows CE-based car headunits. I'm wondering if we could start a conversation about getting Android Auto set up on those head units. I have no idea what would be involved, but I want to see if it's a possibility for discussion.
[Android Auto General] Pilz:
I would also be interested in this if it is possible to port it to other windows or Microsoft based systems.
[Android Auto General] benmeroff:
Yeah I'm bumping this for sure - I've got Microsoft Sync in mine, but it's the non-touch version, so I'm not sure if Android Auto could be configured for that hardware...
[Android Auto General] BTW lover:
You can pretty much forget about this idea right now guys. Even the most advanced and most recent CE head units use hardware that is so outdated that even 1st gen android phones look cutting edge in comparsion (typically 400-800mhz single core processors and 128-256mb of ram). Even if it was somehow done it would be a serious pain in the behind to use.
[Android Auto General] silent_bob52637:
Simply put no it will not happen

99.9 percent of windows ce devices are armv6

Only first gen android runs on that and android 5.0 requires atleast armv7

Ot would require a complete rewrite of android from the ground up and thats 2-3 yrs work if you can find a team of about 30 devs all willing to give up their day jobs to do it for free

90 percent of all android head units available already will not see auto at all just like all the android watches that will mever receive wear
[Android Auto General] tbkdan:
That's assuming that Android Auto is running full-blown Android. My understanding is that the phone is doing all of the heavy lifting and the head unit is effectively a "dumb display" similar to MirrorLink. If that's the case, then the head unit doesn't need to do much and they are probably using some pretty low-spec hardware already. Now, if you're trying to get Android 5.0 on these systems so you can run Android Auto without a separate phone, then I agree - most headunits will not be able to handle that with their low specs :)

Anybody have any info on what the head unit is actually running on an Android Auto system? Does Google provide anything as an example, or is it strictly APIs and left unto the car/HU manufacturers to figure it out?
[Android Auto General] silent_bob52637:
Android 5.0

Android wear

And android auto are all the same os

Need the same type of specs just look at the moto 360 and lg watch

Way to powerful to have on a windows ce device

The watches are also nothing more then a notification mirror on a digital watch with specs of over 1ghz cpu and 512mb ram the most powerdul windows ce device is the htc hd2

Which runs a 1ghz cpu and 512 mb of ram in the eu model
[Android Auto General] tbkdan:
www . androidcentral . com/all-you-need-know-about-android-auto

The head unit is not running Android (although I suppose it could). The head unit is running whatever OS the manufacturer wants and interacts with the phone, acting as somewhat of a dumb terminal to display information from the phone. The phone is running the meat and potatoes of the Android Auto solution.
[Android Auto General] azq8ooz:
gf
[Android Auto General] bbc0:
Does anyone know of a car infotainment system that has been rooted? I am thinking of installing one in my 2005 Subaru Outback and am hoping to have something that I can install my preferred apps on. I know I can use my Nexus 7 to do it but I'd prefer more of a 'drop in' unit.
[Android Auto General] mikereidis:
http://xdaforums.com/android-auto/android-head-units/4-4-2-kitkat-head-unit-newsmy-carpad-t2865525

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2660662

:)
[Android Auto General] rvbeppler:
That's not android auto for Windows CE, but this app Easyconnected allows you to mirror everything from your Android phone through usb cable. Just activate usb debugging on developer options.

I know it's in Chinese, but nothing that Google translator couldn't help.

http://www.carbit.cn/
[Android Auto General] rewen:
Good link. Now if someone could get it running on their own HU
[Android Auto General] rvbeppler:
I've got to run it on my Hyundai OEM navigation, made by Motrex. It works perfectly, but I had to use an old version to change the language to English, hacking the zip file with languages, I've exchanged the file name with English phrases to the Chinese file name.

In the newer versions, this zip file has a password and I didn't find another way to exchange the language from Chinese.
[Android Auto General] rewen:
Can you elaborate on how you got it working? I've got a 2013 Santa Fe Sport (Limited; nav) and would kill for this. I've been searching junkyards for 2017 head units lol