yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ArthStyle:
Thank you! Finally. One guy told me my phone's motherboard was broken. So yeah i went nuts and asked almost every forums.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] buell47:
Lol [emoji2]

Every Device with a CPU goes warm. If this is a issue , so my TV, Laptop, PC and so on is broken ;)

All devices have a aktiv or passiv cooling unit, just Mobile Phones don't have. 43°C is under this circumstances a good result.

Hope you understand my bad English and you know what I try to told you? :)

Gesendet von meinem SM-N9005 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ArthStyle:
yes. I understand. :D thanks man.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] buell47:
[emoji106]

Gesendet von meinem SM-N9005 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ArthStyle:
can i ask what is your normal idle temp? (cpu)
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Someguyfromhell:
Idle seems around 40 as well for me, today is quite a hot day here (+31 C, not very usual in my region)
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] buell47:
Mistake, I told you my Battery temp

Here are both in idle, wifi on and Facebook in background :)

Gesendet von meinem SM-N9005 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ArthStyle:
[MENTION=424849]someguy[/MENTION]forhell

the normal temperature here in the Philippines today is 37c i think that's also a main factor why im getting 40-48 idle.

[MENTION=517028]Buell[/MENTION]

thanks man!
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] raied115:
Try going up to 70C° while playing games.....

Now that's not normal!

In your case, it's absolutely regular to have this kind of temperatures. Don't worry about it. If you notice the phone is getting hot(not warm, but really hot), then it's not normal...
[Galaxy S III Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Kobro:
Is there imperium rom for s3 mini?
[Galaxy S III Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GXGOW:
No, but you could try to ask a developer to port one to our devices.

Sent from Tapatalk on my GT-I8190 running Novafusion's Carbon 4.4.2
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] CJNYC:
OK, I've had the i-mate JASJAM ROM installed on my TyTN for a little more than 24 hours. As you probably know, this device was just released this past week, much later than the TyTN. The ROM build seems to be signficantly better based on speed and maturity of the drivers. I have now installed the 2GB microSD card all the software I was using before, including...

1. SPB Pocket Plus

2. WorldMate Pro

3. Verichat

4. PIE Plus

5. Virtual Earth Mobile

6. TCPMP

7. SlingPlayer Mobile

It would seem that i-mate has fixed the issues I was having with the audio/video drivers. When using SlingPlayer Mobile with the original TyTN ROM, the stream would play successfully for a minute or so and then begin to stutter badly whenever I got an email or the device did anything else, which I believe was due to the audio driver. With the i-mate ROM, the issue is completely gone. I can leave SlingPlayer Mobile open indefinitely without issue. Additionally, I find the device significantly more responsive. While it is still slightly slow to turn on from standby sometimes, switching between applications and the overall responsiveness is much better. Now, whenever I press the envelope button, it switches to Outlook instantly while before there was a definite lag. Additionally, I'm getting significantly fewer momentary system hangs and the keyboard seems a bit more responsive, with very few skipped keystrokes. Lastly, battery life seems modestly better.

You can get the ROM over at xda-developers.com, but be sure to read carefully about installation. To get MMS properly installed again, you need to install that CAB from the original TyTN extended ROM.

That being said, I still can't get MMS to work through Cingular :(
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] lpsi2000:
The Cingular MMS Server Settings are:

Server Name: Cingular MMSC

Gateway: 66.209.11.61

Port:9201

Server Address: http://mmsc.cingular.com

Sending Size Limitation: 100K

Wap Version: Wap 1.2
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] nickcerda:
I use:

# Server Name: Cingular MMS

# Gateway: wireless.cingular.com

# Port number: 80

# Server address: http://mmsc.cingular.com

# Connect via: MEdia Net

# Sending size limitation: 300k

# WAP Version: WAP 2.0

This is right from cingulars support page for use with the wizard. I have tested this on the TyTn and it does work.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] CJNYC:
OK, here's my problem. I'm using the isp.cingular APN to connect via the following settings...

Access point name: isp.cingular

Username: WIXDC001@W5.MYCINGULAR.COM (case sensitive)

Password: ZXY203DC9K0402 (case sensitive)

Believe it or not, I can not get the wap.cingular APN to connect for some reason! Do you have to be using the wap.cingular APN for MMS to work?

Thanks!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] nickcerda:
Don't know why dont you try these settings, test MMS, then we'll see from there.

Configuring the Cingular 8125 for Pocket Outlook e-mail and/or Wi-Fi access:

1. From the "Start" menu select Settings.

2. Tap the Connections tab, select the Connections icon.

3. Select the Advanced Tab.

4. Tap Select Networks.

5. Select My ISP from the dropdown and tap Edit.

6. With Cingular GPRS selected tap Edit.

7. Verify the following setting and press Next:

* Enter a name for the connection: Cingular GPRS

* Select a modem:Cellular Line (GPRS)

8. In the "Access point name" field enter wap.cingular and select Next.

9. Verify the following profile settings then tap Advanced:

* Username: WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM

* Password: CINGULAR1

* Domain: Blank

Verify the following settings and tap ok:

10.

* Use server assigned IP address: Selected

* Use specific IP address: Unselected

* Use software compression: Unchecked

* Use IP header compression: Checked

11. Tap Finish.

12. Tap Ok.

13. Attempt an internet connection.

If problem persists, please contact Cingular Customer Care.

NOTE:

APN: Access Point Name
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] mrvanx:
Hey people, If i did install this new ROM onto my TyTN (removing the origional HTC version) what things would i need to do to ensure the TyTN is working just as it was before the new rom (3rd party apps and things like MMS) ???
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] gravejoker:
What are the benefits of the iMate JASJAM ROM as compared to the original HTM TyTN ROM?

-JoKer
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] mrvanx:
Just to add, ive began using the imate ROM and im experiencing MMS problems with O2 UK also..... update soon when ive tested further
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] mrvanx:
...it seems that having installed the .cabs from the HTC ext rom it messed up MMS?! I reinstalled the imate ext rom by copying the contents from the wiki page in this file to the unlocked ext rom folder, then running the autorun file. It once again prompted for my carrier (to which i selected O2 UK contract) ....and (lol) again it froze when installing the IMEI restricted cabs.....a soft reset cured this. Now testing MMS and its working correctly.

(wiki page updated to warn of this effect)
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] mike.bradshaw:
Wifi problems after installing the JasJam ROM on a TyTN

I agree with the first entry on this thread that the imat eROM seems to perform better than the HTC version, however I do not seem to be able to get the WIFI to connect.

The Comm Manager shows it switched on but when you go to WIFI Settings, the screen does not show any settings and it is not possible to refresh a netwrok list to force a search.

Does anyone have any ideas? Is this an Extended ROM install that I missed?

Thanks

Mike
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Daryan:
MMS a definite issue

I upgraded my TyTN to the i-mate ROM today after extensive research on line to see the effects of a move like this. It all worked fairly well and I agree with the original post that the i-mate ROM seems to improve performance and overall 'feel' to the device but I hit the MMS problems same as everybody else, despite trying to use both the i-mate MMS cab file and the HTC MMS cab file (and the MMS worked prior to flashing). I am now putting the TyTN ROM back to see if I screwed up somewhere along the line and maybe start again. I have seen advice saying use the HTC cab and advice saying use the i-mate EXT ROM in it's entirety so not sure where to go next.

(one thing I did do was to run the i-mate MMS cab prior to running the HTC MMS cab without a hard reset in between so this may have played a part)

Will keep you all posted....
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Daryan:
Okay, the HTC ROM is back in place and MMS working fine - same connections settings etc. so there is def a compatibility prob with the JASJAM ROM on the TyTN. BUT..... having put the HTC ROM back the performance really, really does suck so I reckon I am going back to the i-mate option and will screw around with the MMS some more. If I get a definitive answer I will post here.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Daryan:
Finally.....

Ok, it turns out that I am something of an idiot as every time I tried to test the MMS I was typing in the connection settings incorrectly (one of those hand eye things, or the lack of!)......

In summary the JASJAM ROM works superbly on the TyTN device. There are one or two apps that will not run due to vendor locking (as most of you will already know) but on the whole it works perfectly.

To set the record straight (after all of you have looked at my recent posts and despaired) I have put together a custom EXTROM package that will install the necessary onto your device after you have flashed the JASJAM ROM onto it. In order to use it you need to flash the ROM and then soft reset just before the device runs the EXTROM (when it says 'Customizing in 3 seconds') and then unlock your EXTROM (see the wiki for details). Once you have unlocked your EXTROM put the contents of the zipfile into it and either run the Autorun exe or perform a hard reset (I prefer the Autorun option but it is up to you).

I HAVE tested this but only once or twice so pls use it at your own risk. On one of the occasions the MMS was not installed correctly so this was resloved by running the MMS CAB file from the EXTROM.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] daddyo:
Daryan - good work

what cab files are included in your attachment?

I have had a lot of trouble with the MMS settings myself

I installed the relevant MMS cab file and it worked ok but on a soft reset the settings had gone!!

I left it overnight last night with the mms settings installed and when I came to it this morning, they remained after a soft reset!

I did a hard reset and reinstalled the MMS settings via the cab file and again they had gone after a soft reset!

For a final time, I did hard reset, reinstalled MMS cab, left for about 20mins, did soft reset and the mms settings remained.

Elsewhere peple on other devices have mentioned the need for the mms settings taking several minutes to be written to device memory. This appears to be true with my experiences with the tytn mms cab file.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Daryan:
The only cab files that are present are (and some of this is general presumption rather than accurate knowledge) the imate generic stuff such as audio / video drivers etc., the smartdialer, vendor specifics and the MMS install (expand the zip file for specifics)

This is not something that I experienced so can't comment but what I can say is that if you let the standard JASJAM EXTROM install after a flash or hard reset then the MMS feature is not installed straight away. You can get it to work by running the MMS CAB from the extended rom but this also allows the vendor locked cab files to attempt to run and this is an unknown variable. I recommend perform a fresh install (or hard reset) and stopping the EXTROM running by performing a soft reset after initial configuration (see above). Doing it this way seemed to go well.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] gmatharu12:
This is very interesting results! I still haven't got a Vario II yet, but its something I will definitly be pestering my mum for, for a long time lol.

Anyway...

1. I see you use TCPMP, is there a good improvement in playback on this ROM ?

2. What version of the JASJAM ROM is this ?

3. Does the device freeze due to recharging like reported alot ?

4. Lastly... Does the normal stuff work.. Wireless, Bluetooth, Calling, etc...

Thanks v.much in advance!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] Daryan:
Interestingly, I haven't had a chance to test the playback much even tho this is main reason I looked into switching the ROM! When I get a chance to play I'll let you know.

It is a cut down from version 1.18.255.3 07/22/06 (EXT ROM 1.18.255.106) which is the latest WWE version as far as I could tell

The answer to 3 is a no, not that I can tell at the moment.

The 'normal' stuff is all fine. I did quite a lot of research before moving to this ROM and the only probs I found mentioned were MMS (which I spoke about above) and WLAN which I have found to be working fine.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] gmatharu12:
Thats great! Thanks!

Cool and let us all know how TCPMP does when your free, much appreciated!
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rattymon:
Hello friends,

My aim: to run 240dpi kitkat rom with a decently sized keyboard.

What I currently have:

What I would like to have (or something similar):

As you can see mannyvinny's keyboard is half the size almost. Much more compact.

I am running supremekat rom v1 and have used texdroider to convert rom to 240dpi. As the keyboard on that rom won't work at 240dpi I have looked elsewhere and have found only one working 240dpi keyboard which is the one I have shown a screen shot of. This is the work of cocolopes on this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2717866

The trouble is the keyboard is huge, it's like I have a 240dpi rom with a 320dpi looking keyboard.

Does anyone know:

● of any other 4.4 240dpi keyboards that work?

● if I can use 240dpi keyboards from older posts somehow? I have tried manually pushing keyboards to system folder but it never works. I have also tried flashing older zips for 240dpi keyboards but I am just faced with constant FCs.

I would really appreciate any help. Thank you!
[Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500] RatchetHacked:
This is the best tweak that i found on xda threads : PurePerformances™X

For Info , Install Instructions and download here : http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2360670

I'M USING IT ON KK SPEED ROM AND ITS BLOWING MY MIND !! :laugh::laugh::laugh:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rhd-android:
I recognize that this issue is really with Chrome and not specific to my Nexus 5, so if this should have been posted elsewhere instead, my apologies in advance.

The problem -

I am finding that increasingly Chrome's "request desktop version" option is unable to get me out of mobile site versions. When the site doesn't have its own mechanism for changing between the two, this glitch can become annoying.

I know that site designers probably have a role in breaking this functionality, but at the same time, it seems to me that all browsers must be able to appear as a desktop if they really want to, because browsers determine what header information / system specs to communicate to the site. So why are there an increasing number of sites where I can't escape the mobile version using this menu item in Chrome?

In the past, I've solved this by using Dolphin, set permanently to desktop mode. However, a couple problems with this work-around exist:

- I've now run into sites that even Dolphin can't force to go desktop version.

- I don't particularly like Dolphin, and it's a pain to switch to it for one-off uses.

Any thoughts?

It seems like a great idea to make a browser whose sole selling point is that it returns the exact system / browser info that a vanilla desktop browser would, and provides no indication to the website that it's a mobile device. There are just so many sites with horrible mobile versions :(
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chaosdefinesorder:
From my experience, this is because sites are basing which site to display on the resolution of the device rather than the user agent. In the case of the N5, whether you have Desktop mode or Phone mode enabled, you're still reporting a 1080x1920 resolution (note the order). No desktop computer will have a screen width of 1080px (desktop monitor in portrait notwithstanding) thus it concludes you're on a 1080p mobile, therefore mobile website for you!

it is utterly infuriating and I share your pain...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
Is there a site we can test that on? Flip to landscape...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rhd-android:
Engadget is an example, and flipping to landscape doesn't solve it.

So it must be detecting something other than screen resolution and user agent.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zepius:
probably detecting the OS and forcing it that way.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
Yeah I found engadget and npr.org in another thread and landscape didn't fix it. Maybe as [MENTION=3877185]Zepius[/MENTION] says
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zepius:
looking at engadget's source, they use the service optimizely. which looks to be a website optimizer for mobile. i bet it checks the OS to determine how to display the webpage.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rhd-android:
Maybe this is a silly question, but why can't the browser lie about that too?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zepius:
because its querying the system every time there is a request for the OS.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rhd-android:
Sorry, I should have phrased that differently, my response wasn't very clear -

If Chrome actually wanted to "request desktop version" feature to works, wouldn't they want to tell websites that the OS was Windows? In other words, if "request desktop version" spoofs in a user agent from a desktop browser, why wouldn't that feature also spoof the OS when asked by the website?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zepius:
because thats not the way the app is coded. the websites are hard coded to ignore user agents (i believe) and to go based on the OS to tell if its mobile or desktop. you would need a browser or a mod to fake the OS name/version.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Charlus97:
Well. In reality, websites can't really determine that you're using Android as chrome removes this information when you're using the "desktop version" checkbox. Here's an exemple of the useragent sent by chrome with/out the checkbox :

Without the "show desktop version" : Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Nexus 5 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.117 Mobile Safari/537.36

With the "show desktop version" : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.117 Safari/537.36

On a real chrome desktop (windows) : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.114 Safari/537.36

So, there's not really any information (just the Windows NT 6.1) that could say to the website is they need to show a mobile version of their website.

Maybe the website is coded to adjust itselft automaticaly to the screen resolution (responsive design) or, maybe they just put a cookie when you go on the website without the "show desktop version" and, when you enable it, cookie is still present, and they continue to display the mobile version ? (So, try to clean cookies, etc, before checking the box :) )
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rhd-android:
I cleared cookies - that didn't help.

In fact, I also just tried an app:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appo2.ua

It launches an instance of Chrome with the user-agent already changed (no clicking "request desktop version" required). I launched an instance as IE 10. I went to a user agent site to confirm that the UA was changed (in fact, I already felt pretty confident because the google search results were full desktop size/scale). UA was confirmed. Cleared all cookies, cache. Set my phone to landscape. Visited engadged by typing the ULR fresh (not a bookmark or anything). Boom, still goes to the mobile version :(

Doing some googling, I ran into some techniques for detecting mobile browsers. I'm betting that Engadget (and others where this occurs are using a CSS based technique similar to #5 or #6 here:

http://designm.ag/resources/8-techniques-for-mobile-retina-devices-detection/
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Charlus97:
Hm.. What's the exact URL of the mobile version of the site you're redirected to ?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rhd-android:
The URL just stays at the engaget root URL (www.engadget.com).

I've observed something interesting though. When I visit this site in Chrome on Android:

http://www.whatismybrowser.com/

... it actually lists a very low screen resolution (376 x 557)

On that basis, I can see why sites (engadget, etc) show the mobile version. The question is why Chrome would report a lower screen resolution.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Charlus97:
Well, chrome doesn't seems to send the information itself. Maybe a JS script detect it. 'Gonna check that

---------- Post added at 09:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 PM ----------

Yep, whatismybrowser.com detects screen size with a bit of JS

Not sure that we can change it even on a real desktop browser..

---------- Post added at 09:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:17 PM ----------

So, of course, engadget.com too.

It detects screen resolution changes and adapt his style to the resolution. You can check it easily :open the page on a real desktop browser and resize the windows of the browser : same style as mobile version.

And there's nothing we can do about that :/
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] j'vai:
can't even do a *about:debug* in the addy bar anymore..

when pressing go, chrome hits the web, with the addy bar reading chrome://debug/ -
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] j'vai:
check this out -

Brandon Arnold 4 months ago

With mobile first design you don’t need a site switcher, because it’s the same site. There’s nothing on the desktop layout that you don’t see on your mobile, but its better formatted for its screen. The Chrome option you're mentioning is a legacy thing, thats taking actual mobile sites (non-responsive) and requesting to remove the M-dot from the domain. This is necessary because most mobile sites offered a limited amount of content that differed from the desktop. Even the Google Chrome Responsive website, when viewed in the chrome mobile browser has that option to switch grayed out.

With that said, you can try some javascript solutions that change the viewport, like this one*

http://https://github.com/chrismorata/Responsive-View-Full-Site

*Note: This has not been tested with F5

in response to:

I know it's been asked before in the forum but he thread is closed so I can't add anything. I'm aware of Foundation's mobile first principle but it's not mobile ONLY.

Is there an elegant way to give people an option to view a desktop version?

Both Android's default browser and Google Chrome mobile has options in the menu so I don't think it's a minor feature.

...it stalemates there, with an added;

Thanks for your replies. I'll checkout the javascript solution posted above.

It's just that some users really prefer seeing what they're used to on a desktop. I know it's the same content but the truth is some visitors just want to see what they're used to.

.. looks like for now, android chrome has gotten a gnome d.e. thingy effect..
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Themes and Apps] wmfaiz:
Nice one

It make me to come back to jb
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Themes and Apps] bobfrantic:
Happy to read that :D LOL