yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] fbs:
Have anyone tried it with Mahdi? does it work? :cool:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Omer89:
If you read the OP you'll figure out that it's only for AOSP ROM :) , for now
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] fbs:
Well it's not that simple.. I think Mahdi is CM11-based, but CM11 itself is AOSP-based, as everything else, soooo.... :rolleyes:

VanirAOSP even has "aosp" in its name. PA is AOSP-Based, at least it says it is. Oh well.....
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] coffeecore:
You said it right; It's based
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Omer89:
[MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION]

I said (for now) not (ever)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] KINGbabasula:
r4!

To make it clear: by AOSP I mean the rom by J-Team. If it works on other roms, then good

Inviato dal mio GT-I9070 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] I.P:
Thanks fort this new release !

Did you have time to check the link provided by [MENTION=2047451]R_a_z_v_a_n[/MENTION] ?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Toni5830:
That thread is about optimizing whole ROM, and its author, JustArchi, wrote this: (second part of message)

Sent from Italy using Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] dudik9910:
You may say what you want, but with the lastest build of kernel by King the phone is super fast, even faster than on previous builds. So it makes difference.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jfreak27:
So I was updating Kernel for RC 4. Something must have gone bad. At 54percent KK Manager suddenly told flash successful consider rebooting. I rebooted but now couldn't get past SGSA logo screen. Also can't go to recovery. Only download mode. Any Solutions please???
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] :
Nothing to do. Flash firmware with Odin.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jfreak27:
Flash stock JB right???

No other way???

---------- Post added at 07:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:46 PM ----------

Flash Stcok JB right???

No any othe way???
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] :
AFAIK, no way but Odin. Maybe you can just flash with Odin old kernel that used before. But I don't know it will be working or not, you should ask shut_down or Kingbabasula.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jfreak27:
well i do have stock aosp kernel. can I flssh it using Odin??
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
You can't flash *.img file with Odin. I doubt that you can tar boot.img and use it with Odin too, probably you can just flash kernel.bin inside of a tar with Odin. So you can do this, take stock firmware, remove md5 extension, open it with 7-zip or WinRAR, remove all except kernel.bin.md5. And flash that with Odin. You will have stock recovery then, and you can install CM11 over it.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jfreak27:
Can I use this

xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2281287
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
I am not sure because I never tried it.

P.S. We have recovery and kernel on the same partition. So you can't flash just recovery. You might creade Odin flashable for kernel with recovery. And I told you how to do that.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jfreak27:
So I extracted boot.img from aosp (JTeam) which I had earlier, then got boot.tar through this tool. Now can I use It to flash through odin??
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
Like I told you. I am sure that you can do this:

For that I am not sure if it will work. I will not push my luck with that if I were you... I am not sure how Odin recognise files inside of TAR.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jfreak27:
Ok I guess I should not take unnecessary risk. Instead I will just flash stock and root and recovery all over again. Will I need stock fw of specific region or can I download any???
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
If you remember on what fw you was, use that one.

Just do not flash I9070P on I9070 phone, and I9070 on I9070P phone - that will hardbrick.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jfreak27:
KK Manager BUG

hey [MENTION=5093942]KINGbabasula[/MENTION] I think you should change the setting of KK manager app which automatically flashes kernel as soon as it is downloaded ( even if download is incomplete due to some problem). It flashes the kernel instantaneously when downloaded. It happened to me KK manager flashed kernel automatically but it wasn't completely downloaded, which caused flashing of corrupted kernel soft bricking my device. BTW kernel is best!
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] ngr.hd:
Any steps how to flash kernel using temp. CWM?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
No need temp CWM, root your phone, install Universal kernel flasher and some root explorer. Copy kernel to phone and install it with Universal kernel flasher.

NOTICE: This kernel is for AOSP 4.4.2, it will softbrick your phone if you are on STOCK JB.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] ngr.hd:
It says device not supported. I'm currently on PA 4.4.2
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
Well in the first post it says that this kernel is made for AOSP 4.4.2. I am not sure if it will work on PA.

P.S. You did no read this: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=52554347&postcount=3
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] KINGbabasula:
r5 released!

Now you can tweak vibration intensity changing value in sys/vibrator/pwm_value between 0 and 60

Inviato dal mio GT-I9070 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Stevex26:
The download from the link in OP is the file boot.txt instead of boot.img. How to solve it?

[EDIT]: Solved by downloading it from laptop. ;)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9070 con Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] KINGbabasula:
r6

Inviato dal mio GT-I9070 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Toni5830:
Janice now boots with a kernel built with gcc4.7?[emoji15][emoji15]

Damn I'm really curious to know if it works, but I'm on Miui

(Commit for those who are curious like me [emoji16] https://github.com/KINGbabasula/KING_kernel/commit/45320602ac9eb570c2eb80c62a37f1b8cb854226 )

Sent from Italy using Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] KINGbabasula:
Yes it boots with gcc 4.8 too but i'll build it tomorrow with it

Inviato dal mio GT-I9070 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jadega:
Plz king make it for stock rom too
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] hastalafiesta:
Cocafe will surely do it if it also works on 4.1.2
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Theyonut:
The vibrator value goes on 10 (default) after a reboot. I solved that making a file in init.d folder with the term command posted by KINGbabasula in the op. Remember to set the right permissions ;)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Paul L.:
[MENTION=5093942]KINGbabasula[/MENTION] hey, why you don't add this? https://github.com/android/kernel_common/commit/92189d47f66c67e5fd92eafaa287e153197a454f

The changes are pretty simple to add a tunable that Android can access to free some memory when needed. This is the kernel used for, well, Nexus devices.

And I merged this on cm-11 kernel, pretty simple commit too.

https://github.com/alin23/render_kernel_falcon/commit/1d46e9351ae2331ee52115867e6f90c9e425f869
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] tasosf:
Wifi refuses to turn on since I installed v. 6 (latest). On J-team AOSP...
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] KINGbabasula:
Becaus I didn't even know that commit exists :silly: I'll add it now, thanks.

Here it's working without problems
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Toni5830:
So we should edit this line

int extra_free_kbytes = 0;

and writee there how many kbytes we want the kernel to free? so until it's 0 this commit has no effect, right?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] KINGbabasula:
No. That's a sysfs interface. When it's declared that way in sysctl.c it will create the file declared in .procname in /proc/sys/vm . As .procname is "extra_free_kbytes" you will get this file /proc/sys/vm/extra_free_kbytes where you can edit the value
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Paul L.:
Well, *supposedly* is for Android to ask the kernel to free some memory when needed; but you can also put a static value if you want.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Theyonut:
wifi not working with AOSP 4.4.4. With previous build works fine :)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Alberto97:
Impossible, it shouldn't works also with the "After Final" build, caused by the new kernel...
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] gonxsster:
This kernel works on 4.4.4 AOSP?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] KFelix:
Will this kernel work for 5.1.1? Would really like to increase the vibration level. Missing some calls because of it :/
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] sanathxda:
Will it work on cm12.1 5.1.1 plz tell me
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Cassiusss:
Obviously not.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] Hnk1:
Hello

I have a official nexus charger with ratings 2.0 A. My Phone was charging a bit slow so I tried different chargers with Nexus/phones to check the mA ratings with this application.

Current Widget : Battery Monitor

I am getting about 1000 mA from Nexus charger of 2 A while 750-770 mA from my phone charger which is 0.850 A.

Do you think I have a problem with my Nexus charger ?

Can anyone use the widget (drag from widgets to home while charging and set update interval at 1s) and share results what are you getting ?

I would be very thankful!

Update : My new nexus charger has 1.35 and gives 1.1A while my phone charger of .850 A gives 750mA.

Nexus 7 2012 gives 1.7-2.0 A
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] douger1957:
Did you try your experiment with a dedicated charging cable?

If I understand the issue correctly, using a sync cable for charging redirects some of the charging current for other purposes.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] Hnk1:
No, I havenot. Just the official Nexus cables and Xperia Cable. Xperia has built in fast charging as far as I know
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] LinearEquation:
What those cords do is short pins 2 and 3 together allowing your tablet to command more current which will charge the battery faster if you have a charging brick with more Watts (power.) Bricks like the Asus and Amazon fast chargers for instance. More Watts means more current can be supplied at the same voltage. (P=I*V)

That said, you don't want to heat that battery to much. 700mA - 800mA is a great charge. I charge my tablet in 4 hours or less with that. You can also open your brick and short the pins but the cord is cheap enough.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] milleringer:
But try to charge N7 in car while using GPS with 700mA-800mA car adapter. You will get discharging, not charging, so you must use 2000mA. I recommend to use 2.1A for car(I am traveling a lot and never got disappointed), and normal 2.0 for AC charging.(5.0V)
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] LinearEquation:
The OP did not specify with GPS in the car. But for that I use this in the car while storm chasing http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0088U4YAG/ref=oh_details_o04_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 20 Watt 4.2 Amp. I use GPS all the time and the Asus and Amazon bricks charge just fine while using GPS.

Still the tablet has to command the Amps it wants. This is decided in part by the Watts in the charging adaptor/brick. You can have a power supply with all the current capabilities in the world and it won't mean a thing without Power, Voltage and demand for Amps from said tablet/phone.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] douger1957:
I don't believe that's possible. It's my understanding that charging circuits are "smart," in that they'll "take" a voltage and current that tends to maximize battery life and endurance, with thermal limiting to guard against overheating. I think the profile is for the current and voltage to taper off a bit as the battery reaches full charge. Some devices do this better than others, but that's the basic principle.

The charger itself is regulated. The regulator maintains a set voltage, in this case 5.0 VDC. As the device's power requirements increase, the decrease in voltage at the regulator allows an increase in current to maintain the set voltage. Once the device's draw reaches the capacity of the charger, the battery takes over, because the charger can no longer maintain the required voltage. In other words, a 2 amp charger isn't constantly shooting 2 amps to the device unless the device is demanding that much current.

On the subject of chargers, we're not talking about laboratory grade here. Your 2 amp charger may or may not be able to actually produce 2 amps, much as the actual output voltage may not be exactly five volts. It's also important to note in the discussion that device batteries aren't rated at five volts, but something less. 4.5-4.7 is a common range.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] arkolbus:
Are you sure your Nexus charger is 2.0A? I think the 2012 charger was rated for 2A out, but my Nex7 (2013) charger lists 1.35A output on its nameplate.

Either way, could be that the 2013 Nex7 is configured not to draw a lot of current, generally this is for thermal management.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] Hnk1:
First of all,I didn't realise I was using new nexus charger (1.35A) and I thought it was the old charger (2.1A). So that cleared the doubts if my chargers were faulty.

I did few tests, asked my dad who is an Electrical Engineer and came to the following conclusions.

When I'm charging my phone/tablet ; say I'm using 1A, the power given would be around 850-900mA . The power be always less than rated.

If I'm using my phone and charging with same 1A charger, and the power used by my phone is 500mA, I would only see 350-400mA power given to battery as net because the power given would be subtracted from power being used.

Using a 2A charger would charge the battery more quicker, about 2x but it would reduce the life span of battery as well and may damage the device.

As more battery is being charged, more amounts of electrons would be present inside battery so the flow of current would start to decrease slowly . (So it would take more time to charge in the end.)

If charge power is less than usage of device, you would see discharge of device. In this case using a high power charger would charge the device but still it would damage the battery.

Basically, there is a safety factor of a device/battery. So if more current flows into it, lets say it can withstand 1.2 A and came with 1A charger. Using 1.3A or higher would damage the device/battery nonetheless.

I hope this helps and thank you for all your opinions and suggestions
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] arkolbus:
Glad we got to the root of your issue.

There are a couple of misconceptions though:

All things being equal, you are correct that charging at higher current will produce more heat and will generally reduce battery lifespan. It is not likely that you will damage the device by using a higher-capacity charger (unless it is some cheap knock-off charger, but those are dangerous regardless of capacity). The charger is not "constant current", meaning it does not always supply the full current, only what the device requests. Some of the supply current gets used to power the device, and some goes to the charging circuit.

The charging circuit limits the amount of current going to the battery based on how full the battery is (fast charge up to a certain charge % or cell voltage, then slow charge to ~100%), the battery temperature (if temperature is too high, reduce charge rate), and some maximum current (depending on the charge circuitry, battery ratings, design decisions, etc). edit: If you use a (quality) 2A charger, one of two things will happen: either your device will charge faster and you may reduce your battery lifespan, or the charging circuit will still limit the current to some lower limit (like 1.35A), and nothing will change. You are not really at any risk of causing device failure.

Also, there are not "more electrons" in the battery. The number of electrons stays the same, since current must flow in a loop. What changes is the energy state of those electrons. When slow-charging (constant voltage charging), as the battery is charged its voltage rises towards the constant charging voltage. The difference between the charging voltage and the battery voltage drives the amount of current, so as that difference gets smaller the amount of current decreases towards zero per ohm's law.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] douger1957:
I think that would be true... if there weren't a charging profile built into the unit. That profile has the most "juice" going to the battery below a certain charge state. It tapers off as the battery reaches the fully charged state. On some newer devices the batteries contain electronics that help things along. There is certainly thermal limits built in, and at any rate, on higher quality devices at least, only so much current is used for charging. It'll charge at whatever current level the manufacturer has designed and no more, even if more current is available.

And you're correct in that while the device is charging, some current is used for charging while surplus current, if available goes to the running device. Once the device's battery reaches a full charge, the full charger current is available to run the device. If the charger is capable of providing the current needed to serve the device's needs, life is good. Otherwise, the cycle begins again.

Generally speaking, so long as you're not flogging your device by taxing the CPU and or GPU, a 2 amp charger should be sufficient to run say, a music program and a nav program using the GPS. Plug an OTG cable in and start hanging peripherals off of the dongle and all bets are off.
[7" Kindle Fire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Raziel992:
I tried to remove the ads from my KFHD 2013, and only found out later, that the tool I used was intended for the 2012 version only.

My kindle is now stuck in a boot loop. Can you help me to fix it? I'm not sure which tool I can use, for the guides here in the forum usually don't mention which version they require.

The fastboot mode is still working, however the adb driver seems to be unable to find my device.

thanks!
[7" Kindle Fire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stunts513:
Adb commands don't work with fastboot mode, only fastboot commands work with fastboot mode, like

fastboot -i 0x1949 getvar product

There is a utility that will reflash your system to stock in the general section. Don't use kffa with your device though.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2685090
[7" Kindle Fire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Raziel992:
Thanks, but the tool is unfortunately not available. The website doesn't exist. Is there another option?
[7" Kindle Fire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LinearEquation:
Leave a post in that thread. Gran PC is the one who made the tool. As updates come things have to be changed. He's the one who can get you to the right tool for your Soho.
[LG G Flex] dcamposjr:
Hi experts

I have a new LG G Flex LG-D958 in Brazil and basically I have 4G working in my home with full signal, but if I move to a place where there is no 4G, (only Edge) the band will never go back to 4G automatically, even when I move back to a place where the 4G signal is full. Is like my phone goes down in the bandwidth but never goes up again.

I have to manually go to config the Network Mode and change from Automatic to 3G, and then Automatic once again to make it works back in 4G.

Is there a correction for it? Sounds like a issue with the Baseband. Is there a software or something I can install to make the phone try to move from EDGE to 3G/4G automatically?

Thanks experts.

Daniel Viana
[Galaxy S III General] Aries25au:
Hello to all members,

I am starting this petition for the sake of all members who actively follow and enjoy the work of both

Ricky

and

SkywakerZ

with their Revolutionary S5 V3 rom. I honestly believe that the continual asking of ETA is a rude and disrespectful manner, no matter what the feeble excuse is given, as the work and time that these guys put in to produce the rom is in-valuable. A good suggestion would be maybe a moderator could delete any reference to ETA.

I believe that the work these guys do is superb and them ceasing it would be a loss to all who strongly follow and support their work, due to the stupid and thoughtless actions of some.

PLEASE

guys dont stop what you have been doing for the sake of some simple thoughtless actions of others.
[Galaxy S III General] kunal1540:
Don't start another thread.. A similar thread is present I don't know for what reason..

Plz do read the rules yourself on xda before teaching it to others...

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] Aries25au:
Sorry just got home and found that that this is posted , yet I posted it early this morning before I went out,

If mod wants to delete please do so.

:)
[Galaxy S III General] Jonny:
Thread closed as there is already one about this.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] marsmarg:
I have the O2 Trion and have had very few issues, apart from not waking up from sleep mode about twice a week, however is there anyone out there who can help with a feature that I would like to do:

I would like to use the front Video Cam with Skype.

Any feedback would be great.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] goestoeleven:
I think we'd all like to do this... probably will require a special/new version of Skype for the Hermes...
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Moskus:
... or the Skype team needs to find the WM5 SDK. ;)
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] vijay555:
I don't know anything about this, other then to say that from what I understand, the normal photo camera (back) is accessible through API, but the front camera (self portrait) isn't. But that's only a hunch based on the Universal.

V
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Moskus:
Ah! I think you're right about this...

Well, hopefully Skype finds a way...
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] research12:
skype support for hemrems coming up in september: http://www.ateksoft.com/de/download.html
[Sony Xperia M] benn_seiei:
please help,

my phone suddenly dead after i went for pee (but i did't grab it when i take pee) :p

now, my phone can't start, can't charge, can't connected to pc,

i tried to solve it by pc companion, SUS, and flashtool,

but there is no sign that my phone detected by those tools,

and there is no led indication when i connected to pc,

what i suppose to do?
[Sony Xperia M] Shazam_strikes:
If your phone isn't even going into flash mode than better try pulling out and reinserting the battery or try another one, and if that not works than take it to service center, no matter if you have rooted it they won't notice unless you have unlocked bootloader.

But mostly I think it's a battery problem so try another one from your friends or anyone. Good luck.

Hit thanks if I helped
[Sony Xperia M] paper13579:
Wow, this is strange. As the comment above mine said, i also think it is a battery problem
[Sony Xperia M] benn_seiei:
i've tried to pull-insert battery, but nothing happen

then i tested battery with a led, and it's lighting

so i think it's not battery problem

do you think it's hardware problem guys?

thanks for your replies

:)
[Sony Xperia M] dunc4n88:
I've seen this problem before with a work colleague, he got a c1905 for his daughter and within 2 weeks it did the same just turned off and wouldn't turn back on or do anything so he got a new one thru warranty pretty sure its a hardware problem on the board
[Sony Xperia M] benn_seiei:
unlucky me

my waranty is void, because white-mark on my phone turn into red

:(

maybe i must look for new phone

thanks for your info