yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] gaww:
If you are rooted and on TW 4.4.2, it should work fine,

---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:23 PM ----------

Thanks - saved me the time in trying it out myself. There are a number of kernels on US M919 forum for TW 4.4.4, but nothing as developed and this one - which is why I was interested.

I am also staying with 1.1.7 here (Imperium v12) for now - it is running pretty good including battery life even while using some healthy OC. The combo is really fast.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nicke85:
I don't agree, seems that you didn't formated the whole device to f2fs maybe. F2FS is rules and future standard for all mobile devices,

F2FS > EXT4
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mystique:
I will be more interested in f2fs when it is a present standard.

Nothing against f2fs or the people asking, it simply seems to be very dependent on many variables some of which are confusing.

Having limited time, the kernel and occasional ROM seems to be the most gain for the investment of time or energy.

When are we getting xfs or btfs..

?

Seems to be a similar argument that could always be made..

The answer is when I do it, or when someone else does it..

Fighting with my son over the garbage seems to be something that could be won occasionally and I could do myself.. Fighting with my son over painting the house.. Sounds like f2fs..

Nothing I want to do and will never be able to convince him to change his mind..

My 0.02, YMMV
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
the only reason why f2fs is a must for me: i cant install any rom on my device when i dont reformat internal sd to ext4 because otherwise ill get the message encryption unsuccesfull at every boot no matter what rom. im just afraid to be disapointed after formating my internal sd and using googy max. so i would need to reformat it again when i want to go back to f2fs using alucard :/
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
Well if that's the only reason why you feel googy should include f2fs in his kernel, then sorry, not gonna happen. It's an extremely silly reason to pester a developer to add a feature, sorry about the extremely blunt manner in which I'm putting it.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
so you think its a silliy reason because its a big effort for me each time im changing my kernel. no comment... while adding the function is much easier and has no harm to any user in !!!"ANY"!!! case. i think to you it seems simply silly because you dont need it. i takes ages till i got a usefull backup of my internal sd. the only kernels which dont support f2fs is chronic, googy and cm. even liquid smooths stock kernel has f2fs and i dont think alucard is silly because hes kernel supports f2fs....
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Jsilver73:
Errrm, yes I did format all partitions and spent over a month messing with it, in fact I was one of the first to jump on the f2fs bandwagon.

And anyway, don't listen to me, listen to very experienced devs like Alucard and KT - and I quote ' really not all that wow after all!!'

Now perhaps we can stop the off topic and go back to discussion of development of kernel, what do you all think????
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Guys, please. Don't trigger a thermonuclear war because of f2fs. For me, f2fs is not worth the effort !

And please create a dedicated thread to compare kernels which I don't want to exist here that way ! I don't permit to anyone to break the big respect between me and the big alucard!!!

Ps: [MENTION=2698640]nadejo[/MENTION] : can you imagine that this kernel is mainly for my daily use and I enjoy sharing it with the community (and you) ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] dclarkg:
If you need F2FS then look for a kernel that supports it and stop bugging devs, this is the 2nd thread where I see that people gets annoyed by your endless uneducated DEMANDS and silly reasons on why you need something.

Asking a feature over and over again because you need it IS silly and you already got your response: It will be done when the dev feels it has to be done and it won't be made anytime soon so deal with it. You can read so stop posting requests already answered.

If you don't like the kernel then go do your homework and create your own personal kernel
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] satshow:
Just installed the kernel at my stock rom. See a lot of settings in the app.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
You made the decision to move to f2fs yourself. No one forced you to do so. Take a gander at what I wrote earlier again. I never said that the f2fs feature was silly. I said the REASON why you want the developer to add the feature is silly. Just because you don't want/are too lazy to move your stuff back to ext4 format, you decide that its easier for googy to implement it. It is easier, for you and only you. Googy is wayyy too polite and nice(he's been asking me to tone down) but you need to understand that asking for something multiple times is annoying and this needs to stop. Stop comparing kernels and kernel developers, or if you want to, do so in that little thread you created. Just don't do it in the kernel threads And sow discord amongst the kernel developers.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] olskar:
I still have this bug :/
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] vt0r:
[MENTION=1897326]googy_anas[/MENTION] & [MENTION=2698640]nadejo[/MENTION] - Just wanted to let you know I reformatted from F2FS just to try this kernel out, and I'm really impressed with its speed. Bluetooth seems to work very well for me, even with Wi-Fi enabled, which was the biggest problem for me before the latest fixes were synced from CM kernel sources. Other than further fixes on the CM side planned for wireless, this kernel plus the latest CM has my phone in a nearly perfectly functional state.

I've only noticed one problem so far, and that's when setting the governor to nightmare. Upon reboot, the phone loops at the boot animation after the kernel takes over. Since I can't get the boot to complete at that point, I'm not sure if I can get the necessary logs, but I can test again and try grabbing kmsg, etc from ADB, assuming it will allow me to connect during this phase of bootup. I'll test again later to verify, but if the logs from a clean boot are useful, please let me know which ones to provide, and I'll send them along.

Thanks for the great kernel and for your work on it!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
If you're using twrp, just use the file manager, delete googymax folder and reboot. Unless you're using another app to tweak the parameters of nightmare, that may pose as an issue.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Me Gusta:
Yup.. I also get bootloops while using nightmare.. Those were not present on the previous version, so I'm flashing back

Me Gusta!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] vt0r:
Yes, sir. This is exactly what I did to get it to boot again earlier. In the mean time, I'm just using Intelliactive. I'm going to try again later to see if I can get some logs at the time of the issue (at least kmsg and dmesg), and I'll post back with results.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] TLK3:
Performance is slightly better (for me) using F2FS, but it's very situational and not enough to make a fuss over. Having support in the kernel would be nice though. It's not any more trouble than any other file system - except when it's unsupported.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
[MENTION=1897326]googy_anas[/MENTION].

After a day of installing the CM 1.1.8 kernel googy max ,I have big trouble when needs restart of the phone (normal or recovery) the phone gets stuck on the splashscreen of the Rom or get stuck on the screen updating applications bootanimation! no problem obviously with the latest kernel alucard! I had no problem with the 1.1.6 kernel cm. can you consider this for a fix as soon as possible? Thank you
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
What rom are you using ? If cm, which nightly ? Do you have any conflicting init script ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
Slimsaberkat v20141014 : the last release of course. So, I noticed that, with the same kernel settings than googy max kernel 1.1.8, the phone is more smoothly and responsiveness
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Please ensure you do not have any unneeded extra init script and retry with default gmax settings
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
[MENTION=5451244]vt0r[/MENTION]

thank you , finaly a usefull post :) ill try it. did you notice any difference to alucards kernel?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
You really don't need F2Fs.. You actually need FFS more.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Conito11:
1.1.8 is working on Phoenixrom 9.4?

--

Believes in Christ and you and your family will be safe of the Great day of Jehovah's wrath

I9505 Powered with Phoenix Rom v9.4 - Tamirda

GoogyMax Kernel v1.1.5 - Googy_anas

Philz touch Recovery - Philz

S5's S-view Cover service - Karkasss

Jehovah's Thunder Bootanimation - Pas2001

Bootanimation sound - Me

A lot of mods and stuff - Xda community

Thanks to all of you...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
How to know if they is unneeded extra init script on the Rom? In fact I had never touch this before
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
[MENTION=1897326]googy_anas[/MENTION]
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Just take a look at your init.d folder or look for the script cleaner in i9505 folder
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] kofe:
I'm having the same problem as bruno mentioned before. I'm also on SSK. Kantjer just released a new version, i will try that and see if it solved the problem.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
[MENTION=1897326]googy_anas[/MENTION]

I don't find script cleaner? Where is i9505 folder?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Oooops my bad. I meant i9505 forum
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Here

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2492144
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] kofe:
So i flashed the 20th build of kantjer's SSK rom and then the 1.1.8 kernel.

1st i had no GSM signal, and when i tried to enable airplane mode the phone just got stucked, and stayed like this like 30 seconds, and then something FC`ed and i ended in lockscreen. After the unlock the phone started to get hot, and it became unusable, it was laggy as hell, and finally got stucked on notification drawer. I had to force power off, and then again got stucked on bootloop.

Entered recovery, flashed alucard kernel, and it`s all good. I have GSM signal, airplane mode toggle works as it should, and no lag at all.

I can`t give u any log because the phone got unusable, and it was getting really hot, so i panicked :(
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] S2_fa_007:
1.1.8 runs well, smooth and battery-friendly here
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] bluflight:
i did some test now. Seems issue is only when you select nightmare. Phone work but when you reboot phone stay in bootloop.. I'm on cm nightly (13/10) and in init i've only what have cyano. First cleaned with my cleaning. If you keep default values from stweaks reboot work fine

EDIT:

to be able to start phone must flashed cleaning and after kernel, if i flash only kenrel not boot because stay old .googymax folder in data i think
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mystique:
[MENTION=4961334]kofe[/MENTION]

Sorry to hear that.

Have you tried standard slimkat for your device?

I know that kantjer has moved on, in terms of devices..
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] kofe:
I don't want the standard slimkat. SSK has few features that slimkat hasn`t (like lockscreen notifications).
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mystique:
[MENTION=4961334]kofe[/MENTION]

Acdisplay?

;)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Nhawk:
I'm running Danvdh's GE ROM, and 1.1.7 was the first out of many Googy's kernels that didn't vibrate on boot.

Vibrate came back in 1.1.8

Just wanted to mention, since it may give a clue as to the reason, given that Googy knows what changed.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] kofe:
I don't want a 3rd party app. I like the one build into the rom. Thanks anyway.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mohamad.Jo0:
1.18 runs well here

battery friendly

PVS=3
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
ok, i wiped evrything and still had encryption unsuccesfull. so i flashed latest stock (nh8) using odin, now flashed cm11 and all is fine, thank you googy for the amazing kernel. back on ext4. i've never seen such a smooth device. not to much kernel functions. and easy to navigate with stweaks. i love it
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] bossarts:
I can't find vibration intensity setting in Stweaks. How can it be changed? I use latest googymax with latest Slimkat...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Welcome aboard !
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] w3nZ:
1.1.8 works like a charm on cm11 nightly 16/10. Much better performance and batterylife than with the stock cm kernel.

Great work!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
[MENTION=1897326]googy_anas[/MENTION] .I have no worries going under smarthass3. shame because nightmare seemed more fluid!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] stanguay:
Under Misc in Stweaks for me. TW 1.1.8

Envoyé de mon SGH-I337M en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] troullis2004:
I believe that irda does not work.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] misterblonde:
in the ge edition the irda work well with this app https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tv.peel.app
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] troullis2004:
Well in slimkat beta 8.6 it does not work. I'm trying Samsung TV remote. I thought it was kernel related. It could be the rom. Anyone who's willing to test?

---------- Post added at 04:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:15 PM ----------

My device is not supported when trying to download this app? Why?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
stweaks still doesnt support all cores governor stick. on alucards stweaks u coul even set all cores individualy. using device control from playstore i can set the governor to all cores correctly. nightmare gov still causing random reboots. and i miss the toggle for core controll. i can disable it using device control.

hint: download device control, use tasker and set the following:

screen on, cpu max to max

screen on cpu governor intellidemand,

screen off, cpu max to min

screen off cpu governor powersave (because wiht other governors usually it will keep all cores on)

screen on, gpu max to max

screen off, gpu max to min

then go to extra, thermal and set core control off.

go to device controll settings and choose at boot settings all and enjoy

go to stweaks and anable

special tweaks, set read ahead and gov to 3072 and fiops on all.

disable android logger and gentle fair sleeper.

leave the rest as it is.

you will notice your device running almost perfect. with very good battery life :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
Please take note, anyone who follows this advice, that his views or methods bear no relation to anything the kernel developer would recommend, and you do so at your own risk. Anyone fooling around with thermal control at kernel level (especially turning it off) run the risk of damaging your device. Do so with caution.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Me Gusta:
Hey [MENTION=1897326]googy_anas[/MENTION] do you have any plans on building an AOSP kernel for the aosp based ROMs like broodplank aosp? Thanks in advance!

Me Gusta!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Not yet. But who knows what the future can bring?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
Yesterday is history , Tomorrow is mystery , Today is a GIFT, that's why it's called the PRESENT!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Solace50:
would ktoonz kernel tweaker work fine with this kernel? the stweaks ui/accessibility is subpar in comparison. ive seen refrences to faux's in the thread.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Conito11:
1.1.8 working on Phoenixrom :beer:

--

Believes in Christ and you and your family will be safe of the Great day of Jehovah's wrath

I9505 Powered with Phoenix Rom v9.4 - Tamirda

GoogyMax Kernel v1.1.5 - Googy_anas

Philz touch Recovery - Philz

S5's S-view Cover service - Karkasss

Jehovah's Thunder Bootanimation - Pas2001

Bootanimation sound - Me

A lot of mods and stuff - Xda community

Thanks to all of you...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] mattiadj:
Anyone has my problem with vibration intensity? Is always the same... Too low for me! How fix it?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mohamad.Jo0:
+1
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] bluflight:
And i noticed little less intensity of vibration with latest version (im on tw now)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mohamad.Jo0:
sir in GE v1.1.8 init.d support stopped working

can we have toggle to enable or disable it please

can you suggest temporary fix
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] hawkerpaul:
Have you tried init.d Toggler?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mohamad.Jo0:
yes sir and it still not working i have a test script to check as i always use init.d

i reflashed 2 time to check and still not working even with universal init.d
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] djmik21:
Hello people and mr.googy the new cm kernel works great for me. I am using the cm kernel on paranoid saberdroid. The only thing i find and which i am not sure about is sometimes my changes in stweaks dont apply when i boot. I use trickstermod to check the setup, meaning i dont chamge anything with trickster, and although i chose fiops in steaks trickster shows row.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
just set it to row in stweaks and fiops again should work
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Solace50:
also note that ondemand only utilizes multiple cores when needed as monitoring tools have shown while testing out the governor

---------- Post added at 12:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 PM ----------

@googy_anas does you kernel have the msm_hsic_host fix implemented? this is an older issue that affects quite a few that are on 3/4g networks. i noticed this in bbs and the time seems a bit excessive for the kernels wakelock.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
[MENTION=1897326]googy_anas[/MENTION]

i got an idea (just an idea) in theory would it be possible to create a governoe that sets the cpu clocks depending on frames per second? because the devcie can show fps with some play store apps. so there must be a process that generates the fps information. and we could creat some automated commands in the cpu clock matrix like :

cpu threshold 50 if fps>30

cpu threshold 90 if fps<30

gpu max steps...

would something like this be possible? and how hard it would be creating it?

then we could simply choose the frame rate instead of changing all the cpu values, governor tunings, hotplug settings, gpu settings and so on.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
no
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] olskar:
Does anyone know a way to fix the problem that the phones vibrates at boot as if something crashes in the background? :confused:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] hawkerpaul:
Uninstall XPosed framework
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] kraven0731:
Is it safe to undervolt more than 75000? I'm using nightmare and zen combination and currently -75000.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] dannyzamora:
Cant use xposed whitout crashes? :( im have 1 or 2 reboots all days whit 1.1.8 but no whit the 1.1.6 and 1.1.7

Enviado desde mi GT-I9505G
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] hawkerpaul:
Xposed doesn't crash on Googy.

You just get the vibration on bootup, nothing else sinister.

Your reboots may not necessarily be kernel related. It could be kernel, rom or an app.

If you're getting crashes then you need to post up a logcat/last_kmsg up here and Googy may be able to pinpoint the problem.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] inestion:
CM version doens't work on pa beta6, the phone shows the s4 logo and then just stop booting

EDIT: my bad, download an old pa version, sorry
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] heblu:
Exquisite kernel :) Probably the best for S4. I'm using TW version

Just wanted to thank you for this and that I'm happy you're back :)

Let good luck be on your side always !
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] edzamber:
Deleted
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
Because its not a general aosp kernel. Its only for cm11 but i might be wrong
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] kraven0731:
Today, i got 2 random reboots. I'm using nightmare and zen with -75000 voltage on all cpu mhz. I have already increase 1 step higher on all cpu mhz voltage and hopefully will not encounter any RR anymore.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Ritvars:
Installed an hour ago, will keep testing and decide wheter to go back to Alucard or not. Till now everything works perfect, except for random vibrations and force closes on Play Store.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Dijkstra88:
New GCC released by Christopher83 (4.9.2-10) :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] davtse:
Do you know what are the changes?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nadejo:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2106644&page=7
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] olskar:
Besides that :o
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] !crazy:
It is safe, but your device probably won't be able to handle it so do not check 'apply at boot' option, or you'll stuck in a boot loop.

Also do not UV GPU. If you Google or search xda you can find explanations from Paul - faux, and other people where they explain mechanism of why that doesn't work.

---------- Post added at 08:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:22 PM ----------

@googy_anas thanks a lot for including (properly) inteliactive governor. As far as I can see it, you are the only one who succeeded in porting it to another kernel except faux own.

Yes there are bunch of kernels which have it listed, and it partly works, but not really /properly.

Also please consider removing dynamic file system patch, because faux self is against it and kernel already includes stuff like vm.laptop_mode (Auto FS write back delay mode.) plus whole dirty (background) ratio, cache pressure, swappiness tunables which offer same, with possibility of fine tuning, and 'Auto FS write back delay mode' (laptop mode) is recommended by faux over dynamic FS.).

Thanks a bunch.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] DaReDeViL:
Amen ! ( noted [emoji6] )
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
Hi

Does it run fine on carbon Rom i9505?? With nightmare and Zen? No rr?

Thx
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] juju2011:
Hmm I wanna try this on my i337m but can't get cm kernel to boot the tw works great BTW but switched to liquidsmooth and phone stuck at Sammy screen when I flash cm kernel am I missing something??
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] FlanjeUK:
Try it... Do you see any complains about rr?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brunodu91:
Rr with gov nightmare and Zen io!