yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] GabeEddyT:
Download ROM Toolbox from the Play Store. Within the app, go to kernel tweaks and scroll to the right to edit governor settings. From there, edit the down threshold so that it's 30 or higher. After doing this it should scale down more easily.

Sent from my GT-I9500
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] maxfu:
new version v10f1 uploaded, and I reorganized the folders, so please go to OP to find the addresses.
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] ameshiya:
After Flashing The New Release I LosT The RooT Access And The Phone Reboots After A Heavy Use
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] VoLTaqe:
Because of zip script remove supersu file and copy Superuser app's file. You have to flash supersu autoroot with odin or flashable supersu zip
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] ameshiya:
Yes Thats What I Do Im JusT Informing The OP , And I See ThaT The Max Freq Is SeT To 1.6 And Theres No More Freq
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] zenosteam:
+1 ;)
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] virux1:
wonderful...

After waiting for adam kernel, finally there is something close to it...

After testing two versions here are my suggestions. .

1.The conservative governor needs some work, it is stuck at the maximum frequency.

2.You need to remove the root feature,it breaks root...I assume that anybody flashing this kernel has to be rooted so adding root isn't ideal.
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] GabeEddyT:
Check the previous post I made for a temporary solution for the conservative governor.

Sent from my GT-I9500
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] farz2farz:
Brokes camera rec

Impressive. But it brokes vid rec on aicp kitkat rom
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] nagpalkapil:
@maxfu pure awesomeness. New version v10f1 is perfect. I9500 has atleast one Kernel on AOSP now to rejoice. We may not have plentiful choices but we stand against the best of Kernel any device has on XDA. Thanks for giving the pleasure to use such a brilliant kernel.
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] virux1:
Working, but still needs to be used without Rom toolbox

+1
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] powerskunk:
Muchas gracias gracias por tu trabajo!!!!!!

Enviado desde mi GT-I9500 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] skywalker_fakih:
Great battery life (y)

I love this kernel,

But when i flash it, i lose access to internal SD Card, any suggestions guys?
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] sjadhav252:
how to install this kernel after install i cnt get stweak
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Droidcore:
Flash kernel and download stweak from playstore
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] sjadhav252:
which one is better to flash via odin or cwm
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] sjadhav252:
After flash this kernel phone lags in everything on i9500 phone working very slow
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] torque2584:
I am having random reboots even after rooting it through Odin rest everything is fine here using v10f1 Omega 19 ROM
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] skywalker_fakih:
No Internal storage write permission ??
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] avrahamelaku:
I'm using the same versions combination as you, and don't have those issues, smooth, fast, best kernel. Try doing full wipes then flash kernel and update root.
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] veer1238:
any news regarding kernnel for 4.2.2 miui?
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] --PANTELOS--:
I'm on pac rom. for me after flash doesn't boot
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Droidcore:
For me same, but 1st flash boot

2x can't boot :(
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] anderson79:
I wonder if the kernel is installed via odin maxfour someone please explain to me

Enviado desde mi GT-I9500 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Ntmcn:
I'm on cm11, what version of the kernel should I install? There is to many version and names.. I'm confused :confused:
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Droidcore:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/maxfuacm/files/Kernel/MaxFour/v10f1/GT-I9500/aosp-kk/

Tc- Overclock version

No tc - no oc
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] arber95:
I am using AICP kk rom and i want a non oc kernel, which one do i use ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] anderson79:
Good tell them to install the kernel maxfour and after a while I turn off the WiFi is not right because the install was one that is zip recovery was

Enviado desde mi GT-I9500 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Droidcore:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/maxfuacm/files/Kernel/MaxFour/v10f1/GT-I9500/aosp-kk/kernel-i9500-aosp-kk-v10f1.zip/download

No oc :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] CrazyBytesVE:
Why do I get error in this process Android.phone with Mokee ? As with the Perseus ...

Enviado desde mi GT-I9500 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] robix1999:
reboots

Opera(old and new) + Omega v19 + MaxFour 10ftc(i9500) - when using opera many reboots
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Xphoid:
The kernel pack can be used like Androiders suggested, but I would go for only boot... AICP is already fully rooted...

Been on TC version since last night... Will give further feedback...
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Droidcore:
I only put boot.img :D

Tc version not work for oc
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] arber95:
Very smooth and stable kernel, but i seem to be having a very low volume while playing music even on max volume setting. Any fix for that ?

Using Viper4Android.
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Xphoid:
Yeap OC not working... Can confirm that...
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] nagpalkapil:
Install kernel.tar file via odin, simplest and safest way to install.

---------- Post added at 05:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 PM ----------

Via ODIN is simple and safe.

---------- Post added at 05:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 PM ----------

No kernel is perfect, have tried it with various Roms - slimkat, AICP, PA, PAC man. No lags. No errors. Just wipe cache and dalvik and reboot again. It would be all good again. No internal storage or rebbot issues or lags. Go ahead.

---------- Post added at 05:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:51 PM ----------

Dirty flash again. Then install the kernel. It will work for sure. Working perfectly with everyone else. Give it a try again its worth it.

---------- Post added at 05:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------

Aosp folder. Download kernel.tar without tc.

TC is overclocked.

---------- Post added at 05:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:55 PM ----------

NO errors with mokee. Mokee is actually by far the most stable ROM here for I9500. Just dirty flash and then install the kernel again via odin. Must not have any issues.
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] modyt:
How can you say that for every rom and kernel? You are just confusing the users.
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] nagpalkapil:
I9500 all roms on xda thread are working with this kernel. Not rom for other devices. If I confused u anywhere I am sorry. But u may clarify anything which confuses u. I will try my best.

U may directly seek reply from [MENTION=3805586]maxfu[/MENTION] for anything which is still not clear. Thanks
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Xphoid:
@ AICP users:

you can safely use THIS VERSION... without TC and only boot.img...

flash using ODIN or replace the boot.img file in AICP rom.zip before flashing...
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] arber95:
Already did that and everything seems to work fine except i now have to Disable HW overlays every time i reboot and the speaker volume is very low ..
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Prattham:
We have to use stweaks for thus kernel??

I9500-Exynos-Octa Core
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] skywalker_fakih:
I wiped cache, i still cant write to internal storage, i am using beanstalk rom, when i flash persues i can write to internal storage, only when i flash this kernel i cant access the internal storage / cant record videoa, image, whatsapp media, nothing related to internal storage, any help guys?
[Galaxy S 4 i9500 Android Development] Prattham:
I downloaded stweaks gave root access but

It says stweaks have fc

I9500-Exynos-Octa Core
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] gibrannz:
Hello there.

I'm hoping someone will help me. I'm trying to downgrade the android version on my T999 from 4.1.2 To 4.1.1 please help.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] serio22:
If you never did the 4.3 official update then you can just Odin to 4.1.1, or if you have custom recovery you can flash a 4.1.1 ROM as well.. Pretty sure there's threads on this subject
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] gibrannz:
I'm on 4.1.2, I'm unrooted. Which file should I download and flash to be stock 4.1.1?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] serio22:
4.1.1 LJA firmware and flash in Odin
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] gibrannz:
Can I flash even if I'm not rooted?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] fz8975:
AFAIK yes
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] gibrannz:
Got it. Thank you.
[Nexus 5 General] markdapimp:
First lets start by saying THERE are NO HARDWARE DIFFERENCE'S Just the matter of your carrier accepting the device

*Disclaimer : This information may change in the future and I'm not aware of any other CDMA carrier that does this in the UNITED States besides Sprint (If you do post and let us know). Most of the world is on GSM anyway right so this doesn't even matter to you

The Google Play Version allows you to go to Sprint and T-mobile

The T-Mobile Version or Carrier version will only work on other GSM Carriers while the Google play version allows you to go CDMA and GSM

Both of the Carrier and Google versions sold have the same internals and same everything else its just the matter of your carrier accepting it

If you're going to be using it for GSM only the carrier version is fine, however if you would like to use Sprint one day you would need the Google Play one or buy one from Sprint Themselves

Overall From Carrier and or Google Play Hardware/Software is the same its just the matter of your carrier accepting it :good:

Another Difference is that Carrier purchased Nexus 5 GOOGLE WILL NOT RMA only LG can with their Limited 1 year warranty

THE RMA Process is Only available from Google If the device was purchased from them

So for best warranty service try to purchase from Google Play

So Mark...? How do I know this is true and not one of your BUll***** threads again?

Simple Try going to ting and or any BYOD Sprint MVNO or Sprint themselves in order for them to activate it the ESN/IEMI must be in their system the google play ordered device will show however the Carrier purchased one Example T-Mobile wont show

It may sound stupid as all Nexus 5's should be unlocked and can be used anywhere. As it should be but it isn't

This is an Error on Sprint's End. This was similar to the iPhone 4s being GSM unlocked however carriers such as Sprint/Verizon Locked it
[Nexus 5 General] danarama:
I'm not quite sure what this thread is about.

CDMA carriers have to have your ESN in their database for the phone to work on their network. They have all the Google play ESN's and all their own carrier ESN but they don't have other carriers' ESN so you have to ask them to add it. Is that what this is about?
[Nexus 5 General] markdapimp:
Yep, you can go Sprint to T-Mobile but you cant go to T-Mobile to Sprint
[Nexus 5 General] danarama:
Do they refuse to add the ESN when you call them up?
[Nexus 5 General] mistahseller:
I am confused as well.
[Nexus 5 General] RainMotorsports:
Sprint seems pretty horrific with dealing in ESN's anyways. 6 support calls and a friend of mine could still not activate my old e4gt. They knew it wasn't blacklisted for stolen or funds due. They knew the exact date the phone was last activated but it wasn't until I told him to tell them the old number that they are like oh that hasn't been released from the line (which no longer exists). You would think you would get a clear and concise message trying to activate a device that is attached to another account not cryptic errors people are asking if they have ever seen before. One support staff actually asked him "are you sure its a sprint phone".

We already know AT&T doesn't exactly deal as well with the N5 as we would like to.
[Nexus 5 General] Pirateghost:
Really?

I bought the play store edition, popped in my sim card and that was it...

Sent from my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 General] RainMotorsports:
Thats the best way to do it too. You already had service right? Possibly previously owned an LTE device? But its been encountered many a time they won't provision the account with LTE if the device ESN isn't in the system. But if you have an AT&T device available to activate on its no big deal. Already have service even better. Not an issue for say ST Byod or something.
[Nexus 5 General] paperWastage:
Here is what I understand

Google version=bought from google play

T-Mobile version=bought from tmobile

Hardware wise, they are exactly the same.

However, sprint only has the ESN of the Google version (and their sprint version)

When op tries to activate the tmobile version on sprint, sprint (or ting) was unable to verify the ESN and refused.

Gsm providers are fine because you just pop the Sim in and it'll work (baring other stuff like imei blocking or att not allowing your Sim card to access LTE but allow 3g)
[Nexus 5 General] mistahseller:
But couldn't you just obtain that, give to sprint, they enter it, and then call it did?
[Nexus 5 General] paperWastage:
But what if Sprint's policy is only to allow a whitelisted phone on the network?

Otherwise, you could call them up with a Verizon ESN and get to use a Verizon phone on sprint?

//why I'll never touch CDMA even with a 20 foot pole
[Nexus 5 General] Zepius:
this is both vzw's and sprint's policy.
[Nexus 5 General] paperWastage:
True, but sprint could be doing things differently with the nexus 5

I don't know, but from ops perspective, looks like this is happening.

Imeis (and probably ESN) have a specific structure. (Go Wikipedia imei. On mobile, can't link easily)

If google/sprint version have the same starting digits and are white listed, and T-Mobile has different digits, then yeah
[Nexus 5 General] danarama:
I have seen posts that suggest this can be done

Most recently:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2672066
[Nexus 5 General] Pirateghost:
AT&T don't care what device you use. Call them and tell them you want to pay them money for LTE, give them the imei (they don't use esn) and they provision a sim card.

Sent from my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 General] david279:
All you have to do is call sprint and give them the esn and it will work on sprint.
[Nexus 5 General] rubiconjp:
I ordered my N5 on 1st available day. Then went to local ATT store and set up my ATT Go account and SIM, without the phone, for free. When phone arrived, I just bought ATT Go pin from callingmart, pop in SIM and voilà, LTE.
[Nexus 5 General] RainMotorsports:
Company policies often have little to do with the current behaviour of high level software that abstracts the process from low level tech support. I don't think it was even an issue until very recently as most international unlocked devices were not compatible with their LTE nor do travelers take contracts. There are a couple of tricks experienced support know and even better if you get a higher level support tech answering your call rather than having to elevate. Sometimes its an easy day some days its hard.

There are words to use with support that can help facilitate a solution but money is not one of them. Its their job to help you no matter a current customer or new and no matter how much or little your spending. Talking about money only produces eye rolling and it falls under the same care level as calling your credit card company and telling the random poor soul your cutting up the card. They don't care, though a bean counter somewhere will tell anyone who asks they do or they should. In reality a rep who only gets motivated by threats or talking about money is a prime candidate for retraining or dismissal.

If they haven't already adjusted for this they need to. With the amount of cross carrier compatible unlocked lte devices on the market they will have more customers on them than ever before. Any extra calls to get LTE provisioned is wasted money for them.
[Nexus 5 General] Pirateghost:
Telling them you wanted to pay them money is a figure of speech, like 'hello, I would like phone service' I didn't mean literally call them and say "I want to pay you money for LTE"

Dude, chill out a little. I have been dealing with cell phone companies as an enterprise account for many years.

Sent from my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 General] RainMotorsports:
Right but you might be surprised how many customers are serious and speak like that as if the service rep is part of this corporate entity. I guess you can tell a battered customer service veteran. I once had a guy tell me he was going to file a complaint on me for basically enforcing a policy that had been changed...

I'm a bit bummed actually. As much as I loved getting off sprint I was excited about the device support. So I'd hate to have any issues going back. However if I ever went AT&T it would probably be an mvno.
[Nexus 5 General] Haidary.T:
I don't get this thread but you're making me scared because I just sent my dead Nexus 5 to Fido for repair. Are you telling me I have to send this phone straight to LG instead of going to Fido? On the website it says "Google Nexus 5" so does it mean I have the GPlay edition? I'm in Canada if that matters...
[Nexus 5 General] lesp4ul:
How about international version? I'm in Indonesia :)
[Nexus 5 General] danarama:
Its a non-issue.
[Nexus 5 General] FuMMoD:
The phone doesn't change, read what the thread is about. It's about activating it on Sprint, not the hardware.
[Nexus 5 General] jj14:
Actually, no. Sprint won't add the ESN to their system for a customer. I've seen them turn a customer away (T-mo customer with Nexus 5) at the store (the person called Sprint customer care from there, to no avail.

Google could really insist on Sprint adding the ESNs to Sprint's databases, but since the alternative exists (buy from play store), I guess they don't really have to.
[Nexus 5 General] wideasleep1:
Sorta drifting OT, and a weird topic it is, but I have no problem reminding a recalcitrant csr who the boss really is, and I recommend everyone complain whenever a consumer is treated unfairly or service isn't meeting reasonable expectations. That is why customer service even exists, and is a direct measure of the overall quality of any company I do business with, which Sprint would not be one. ;)
[Nexus 5 General] RainMotorsports:
The consumer complaining "Im spending X hundred of dollars a month" at a csr has absolutley nothing to do with the CSR doing their job. Yet the consumer thinks so. I am either helping you to the best of my ability or I am not. Nothing the customer has to say about money, cancellation of service or yelling will or should increase my ability to help as it means I wasn't doing my best already. We know some things can be done, doesn't always mean that particular CSR is going to be able to help.

It also never matters how the CSR treats the consumer. The consumer can get the best treatment available and they can still complain and no matter how invalid the complaint it can still hurt you. Ive also noticed the trend of company policies filtering down are actually anti consumer. Almost as if they want us to piss off the customer and believe its being nice to them all to have it all come back on us at the end of the day. Also if you dont follow the memo your fired anyways. I will read something and look at my supervisor and say "You know this is rude when you say this right?" but don't forget the motto of the day be polite.

Not sure if its still practice for sprint but my favorite is when they send you a letter letting you know they are terminating your contract for calling customer service too much. Anyone remember when they used to charge for calls? That would suck to get charged trying to activate your Nexus lol. Good things those days are over.

---------- Post added at 12:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:46 AM ----------

Thats kind of sad since every time I am in a t-mobile store I am waiting behind all these sprint customers trying to take on their ETF deal. Its killing me that these customers don't understand what the process actually is so it takes about 30 minutes a customer to explain.
[Nexus 5 General] wideasleep1:
And this would be incorrect. If a customer has to resort to those comments, you can be assured you aren't meeting their expectations. If your hands were tied, send the customer to someone who CAN do what the customer expects (Tier 2/3, Supes, retention) as a system is in place to resolve issues towards customer satisfaction even amid corporate-leaning policies.

This would be incorrect..you are the (first) face of the customer/company relationship, and it's imperative that you treat the customer in a manner the customer expects. To say 'it never matters' is absurd. Your following comments expose a failure within that company to have appropriate complaint responses, not a failure of the consumer.

There is a rea$on those policies are extinct. ;)
[Nexus 5 General] markdapimp:
The Google/Sprint Version starts with 358

the T-Mobile Version starts with 359
[Nexus 5 General] RainMotorsports:
The corporation is often the issue but you then have the consumer who has never done your job. When a customer reports me for literally the exact definition of what I am told to do after having explained this to the customer, I have to blame the customer. He isn't going to call and complain about the policy. His complaint reads that I would not do X for him and thats exactly what I shouldn't have done. Some companies the report no matter how hard an executive would laugh after reading it is still a complaint and its still YOUR complaint.

I can elevate you perhaps but the difference in what an informed consumer knows and a rep 3 weeks out of training knows can be the difference in knowing who could help you. If I believe or was misinformed its not possible and perhaps you are the correct party in the situation I may still have to say different. I don't know what each companies policy is but you can guarantee consumers try to abuse the system several times a day. The reason for lower tier tech support is cost and speed of service. Fast service can make customers happy but highly trained individuals cost money. So any company that has realized customers have figured out they can pick up the phone and immediately say I want to talk to someone higher will develop policies that make getting elevated more difficult which upsets the customer especially people like you and me.

As I say I blame the company for alot of things. An informed consumer might not get discouraged from Sprint because of this but a person who has no understanding might be so mad because their otherwise compatible device is denied and they lose a customer for life. Who was the face that destroyed that relationship?
[Nexus 5 General] minlo:
Maybe sprint changed their policy but 3 years ago while I was on sprint, sprint wouldn't activate any compatible device unless it was sprint branded. Iphone, Nexus, etc are different than bring your own device because sprint would receive esn and add esn at point of sale regardless if you have a sprint account. Apple, Google, etc i assume would send request to add esn to database.... Although a tmo nexus 5 is the same Nexus phone, it still is branded by tmo and sprint would receive no notification to add esn....Only way would be illegal by esn hacking

Sprint was really picky and ignorant when it comes phones....