yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
Settings>Lockscreen>Lockscreen Notifications.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gusmao100:
perfect thank you :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] teddybear3k:
+1

the back button to kill apps is missing.:crying:

Please add this for a perfect ROM.

Ted
[Galaxy S III Android Development] obayda.bd:
Agree.....????:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
If you use Beanstalk Pie, you can enable kill app in it... ;) It's a good alternative... I think...

Inviato dal mio Beanstalked i9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
Some advice to the developers:

1) appbar if possible

2) choice "random" added to each animation control

3) zram option for default kernel

:)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
Why alter default kernel when u can flash any kernel you want? ;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gusmao100:
How activate the proximity sensor to turn the screen alone :confused:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] szunyi77:
I saw a feature in a rom. Turn on the rear camera as a screensaver, and I liked it. You can walk down the street and you do not go into a pit! :)

Even so much that has been updated Xposed framework.

Sorry for my bad english..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
yeah, I also saw it and it's really such an interesting feature. btw, you are using omni-boeffla and am using cm11-boeffla, with the same ROM, do both work the same or omni is better?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] farshad810:
your answer this post from lord boeffla :good:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=51441855&postcount=2948
[Galaxy S III Android Development] szunyi77:
I do not know, I just used Omni.

Sorry for my bad english..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
as I stated in this Post, CM11 Works best for us. :p

---------- Post added at 01:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:21 PM ----------

:cowboy:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
Hi mosh, what do you mean with work best? Can you explain this in little details? Thanks
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
well, after boot up, everything settles immediatlely, no freezing or the likes. I always have button lights off, with omni-boeffla, after boot up, they stay on for like 10 seconds before going off themselves, but with CM11, always off. and generally, the phone feels smoother and "working" I don't have to worry that this might work or this might not. hope that helps.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
Using ATM cm version, I have no issue at all but honestly I can't see even improvements over omni....all seems the same, pheraps as you said notification lights works bettet
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
Battery duration with this ROM is fantastic.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
+1.. I use boeffla CM 2.2 with zzmoove battery yank +row.... You? :)

Inviato dal mio Beanstalked i9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
Cm 2.2 with default settings...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] fbiangel:
Quick question

1st my apologies for stupid Q, but ill ask.

After flashing new update : "-BeanStalk-4.4.275 For i9300 Only 25.03.2014 BeanStalk-4.4.275-20140325-i9300 Media Fire"

I can see still previous version identification ,even during flashing update it was installing like the new version and not reflash of old one.:eek:

...hm...any explanation for it?

Thank you very much for your answers.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
well, the developer of this sweet ROM does not or rather did not edit the build prop for such changes to take effect, maybe coz it was just to fix some bugs here and there, otherwise nothing to worry about as everything is working perfect, doesn't it?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] athankar75:
Just move in Beanstalk from Fusion, due to high battery consumption (except that, excellent rom). Everything looks familiar and promising. So far i didn't check battery life but i wonder to change kernel with boeffla or to leave it as it is due to battery optimizations from developer? Another minor thing but important for me, i did not find any way to answer call with home button, any advice?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
This ROM is really great and has become my daily driver, hope in continuous development and improvement. With fusion rom IMHO is the best choice for galaxy s3, and I've tried all the ROMs available. These 2 ROMs are the best not for little, but huge steps over all the others. Obviously the greetings go to developer like slim team and cm that do the big of the job.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] fbiangel:
yes

I had this idea but i wanted be sure. ( I did comp. and i saw changes) ...and YES! This ROM is really best for SG III. And generally as well. I was testing lot of roms on Samsungs, HTCs, ..etc. But this one has really something magical inside. Simply phone is more quick than me. ( And Im quick). Even its testing version still could be RC or stable immediately. I found few bugs but those were here cos of my mistakes in Kernel setting etc...simply for me no bugs. I cant wish better ROM.

So thank you for info ( button pressed as well;))...and to developer as well of course.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cheese458:
Just installed. love the ROM so far. Is holo launcher recommended? And how can I make the lock screen status bar transparent? Also, is xposed installer included as I it won't let me install
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
Hey bro what did u find differences between fusion rom and this? Im considering a switch but will i lose features?

Thanks
[Galaxy S III Android Development] athankar75:
For me, has many features more or less just like fusion. Some differences only in kernel settings because has other kernel not boeffla. After 30 minutes i get manage to have my favorite customization and my phone looks like before. One minor issue is that i can't find a way to enable answer call with home button, but unfortunately i think this cares only me...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
A little less features but all that this ROM has work really properly and is well organized. And this ROM has optimized battery life compared to fusion. Choice is not easy because these two ROMs are both high high level ROMs.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cheese458:
Quite heavy drain over night. Boeffla kernel stable. These wakelocks are quite normal but I've never had them on for this long?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
Does anyone think that the After-Call battery drain works perfectly?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
That's a new vocabulary here. this is the best ROM indeed.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] sushi689:
I was on fusion for 2 months and i changed it to beanstalk because of the huge battery drain on fusion since last update.

Battery life is very good now and system more responsive than fusion. Battery do not heat like before. No more bugs with camera.

There is just some options missing....can not assign power menu to a button other than power button.

But so far this is the best rom imho.. Can wait the next update..

Thank you to the devs :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup

Sent from my brain
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
good to hia that bratha :) about power button, oh yees you can, just go to settings>beanstalk options>power menu. you can even add a custom app. :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cheese458:
Is the battery life better on the stock kernel than boeffla?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
can you tell me what other features are not found here?

Is there anything EXTRA here that fusion boeffla doesn't have?

Im asking because im really interested but I don't want to full wipe to try this rom :(
[Galaxy S III Android Development] bornlivedie:
boeffla is not good anymore, stay stock
[Galaxy S III Android Development] sushi689:
Just some little things.. Nothing important. There is no iOS recent panel style ....

I can just recommend to change to this rom. Now this is your phone so it is up to you.

Sent from my brain
[Galaxy S III Android Development] obayda.bd:
I'm using fusion for long time....have tried this ROM too. But I stayed with fusion for only back button kill app. Its very important for me...except this...this ROM has almost all features which are present on fusion...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] sushi689:
I can just change color of power menu.

In settings/button, can not do that also.

I was also using back button to kill apps and menu button to display power menu but this is not possible with this rom. Maybe on next release
[Galaxy S III Android Development] faisus:
It would be great if the devs added ALLIANCE theme manager fr customisation

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2698258

Beanstalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] störte:
Sounds interesting. Will give it a shot on the S3 of my wife (if i get a hand on it ;) )
[Galaxy S III Android Development] miksa666:
How's the battery drain with GPS? I had archidroid 2.something about a month ago and it drained my battery like hell with GPS navigation , even though the phone was on car charger.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
am thinking you are not able to express yourself exactly as you mean, coz looking at your question, I can tell you all the options are there, just learn to use your phone, no offence :p you could also try beanstalk pie for more additional options like power menu and back button to kill. there is more than meets the eye, just look deeper m8. :cowboy:

P.S. If possible, add driving mode. :good::highfive:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] sushi689:
That was my settings on fusion rom..... Hold the menu button display the power menu and hold the back button display the recent panel.

And this is that kind of thing I can not do with beanstalk.

with beanstalk, I can assign 7 predefined presets to the menu button and the home button but nothing like power menu or other app.

.... And no offence, English is not my first language
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
I have just confirmed that it's there, Settings>BeanStalk Options>BeanStalk Pie. :p
[Galaxy S III Android Development] sushi689:
Yeah I already found that alternative but I am not using pie or navbar.

Anyway don't care about that, I love this rom... This is the most important. :p
[Galaxy S III Android Development] :
case study FTW!! O..0

ok.. i saw many users using boeffla kernel with this rom i though why not implement it by default in my rom..

so i asked [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] and he given me permissions to include his work :) in rom ..

so Beanstalk + boeffla == ?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] dark'em:
Cool, thank you...buc could you disable the touch to wake feature by default, this optionsmesses my settup (I like to turn off the hw buttons and use the navbar, but with boeffla kernel it always lights up the hw buttons, when you reboot just before the rom boots up, sometimes when you connect to USB, eaven with it's app when you disable the touch to wake faeture under led and display it still does that and it's iritating). Sorry to seam so pesky and keep up the fantastic job!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
Beanstalk+Boeffla= BOMB!!! :laugh:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] kingkaiser:
Might just be me, but I'm loving the kernel on this ROM. I used to use fusion, but battery life was fairly standard (about 10-12 hrs). Currently I'm on Day 1 with Beanstalk, and am at 55% left with 10 hours used so far...

Instead, would it be possible to have the option at install to pick the kernel and for guys like me, we can stick with the normal one that comes with the ROM?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] fbiangel:
This is really excellent idea and thank you for this. I read in this thread that somebody has problem with battery life with it. Well, in acc. to my testing if Boeffla is in default on governor - pegasusq/standard, battery is really excellent. Using different seems to me little bit unstable + bigger battery eating. ( Sometimes I must restart or switch on/off phone cos screen is inactive - only if Im choosing different governor( No app is in possible conflict) ) With cooperation with Boeffla guys i would highly appreciate if you can setup best defaults for using it in fusion Boeffla-BeanStalk.

Thank you for this amazing ROM

Gabriel
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cheese458:
Yes if it comes with recommended default settings that would be awesome
[Galaxy S III Android Development] HorstiG:
Super!!!

Beanstalk-BK++
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
That's awesome, yes boeffla kernel is one of the best kernel for i9300 in term of battery + performance...

Thanks to [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] [MENTION=4868664]Saki3d[/MENTION] [MENTION=4552996]scott.hart.bti[/MENTION] and you :good:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] HorstiG:
Great ROM

HGT - Galaxy S3 blue - Fusion-Boeffla KK
[Galaxy S III Android Development] kasperok:
Hi HorstiG, can you tell me how you get the green speed indicator in your screenshot?

Tnx
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Douglas Gomes:
Fusion or Beanstalk. Which is the best?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
Banana... I think...

Inviato dal mio Beanstalked i9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] jesterpaul:
There is so little in it. Only thing this hasn't got that Fusion has that I have noticed is kill app by long-press back button. But a couple of pages back there is mention of using Pie to do this. I have been using both, and am yet undecided.

Suggest you play with both and make your own mind up :P
[Galaxy S III Android Development] szunyi77:
BeanStalk the Best ROM!

Sorry for my bad english..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Douglas Gomes:
Better at what?

for the same thing.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Guihardrock:
RT because I am using fusion I change to beanstalk and fusion has more features or I am wrong?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] HorstiG:
That's Netspeed Monitor Mini from Store. (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.kfsoft.android.TrafficIndicator)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
[MENTION=4952282]rebelos[/MENTION] No idea why you decided to implement boeffla kernel with Beanstalk. Maybe you can provide 2 update: One with Boeffla kernel and another with a stock kernel.

IMO I prefer stock kernel more than a stock kernel. Beanstalk stock kernel gives me excellent battery life.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] szunyi77:
I think a little more features! I use Boeffla kernel 2.2 stable zzmoove - battery.. 4:00 - 4:30 display time.

Sorry for my bad english..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
But if u dont mod boeffla kernel u will get the same result as stock kernel.

Boeffla kernel is as closest to stock as possible, just with the option of tweaking it ;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
Whatever i always prefer stock kernel :cool: .

I hate camera with Boeffla IMO

Works perfect with stock, just saying!!!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Xander_25:
As someone mentioned earlier, both options can be included; I guess this means that the Dev may have to start using Aroma Installer. I personally prefer the stock Kernel. I've gotten almost two days out of this rom with the default as opposed to using Boeffla. So, include both kernels and let users choose what to install. Or leave it as default and provide a link to download and flash Boeffla. Just my two cents.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
Then why don't you just use fusion and stop spamming our thread with other ROM's stuff. :eek:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] fbiangel:
BeanStalk - Boeffla

As I can see lot of people is for, lot of against.

Using Boeffla K. is giving better battery life plus possibility of tweaks - you can DL app from market ( if you are brave enough, skillful enough or crazy enough - tweaking of kernels is very nice if you know what youre doing. If no, you can pretty nicely jam your phone or seriously damage it).

Stock Kernel is really good enough and providing very nice lifetime of battery and performance. And if battery is 10-20 % less...hmm - who really cares?( you can buy 2nd battery or put charger to your pocket and problem is solved) I like tweaking and of course all together and around is giving me better phone and better knowledge about android system which is developing with very rapid speed.

Offer ( all is up to developer of this perfect ROM cos he/they are capitan of this ship)

1. Two variants of this ROM :

BS + stock kernel

BS + Boeffla + optimal settings predefined ( It means much more work for developers)

2. Leave it as is and provide only link to boeffla - everybody who will want to use Boeffla instead stock, can learn like to tweak or which setting is optimal from Boeffla guys or their threads.

Me personally preferring Boeffla cos I like tweaking, learning, studying and like result as best phone as I can have. If Ill do mistake - Im more clever, cos Ill learn from it. And lot of.

On other side, stock Kernel is very good as well.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
No idea why they want to integrate Boeffla Kernel to the ROM. When that is done, I'm out. [MENTION=5172363]HorstiG[/MENTION] knows how to persuade devs ... probably a talent he is.

Boeffla Kernel is good ... But it should be better to be used as an option and not as default. Depending on your usage and apps installed, I get 4hours using the stock kernel.

I saw someone mentioned he got 4h:30mins with boeffla kernel + Beanstalk. What are the difference, 30 mins? You tell me :cyclops:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
I get 5hours with boeffla kernel and beanstalk now. Thats awsome so boeffla really should be default it works amazing with this rom
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
Lets stop whining like a little ***** ... Whatever happens in the next few days determines where i'm staying.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] :
ok guys enough it is getting a bit offtopic.. since it is a development thread suggest ways to improve it no battery life discussions here.. :)

i have choosen boeflla after lot of hours digging into code .. wait for first buld with boeflla after that we wll discuss about battery ;)

can't build right know currently on holiday .. cya
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Mosh Edd:
How about that :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] :
ok jokes over its 1st april,,, bs + boeffla kernel awsome :D rofl
[Galaxy S III Android Development] obayda.bd:
If you are really planing to release a new update then pls consider back button long press for killing app.

Thanx...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] skchattha:
Why is it so necessary for you to kill the app when Android system takes care of them managing the phone memory? Pls dont be so cruel. You dont have rights to kill somebody. Police will be behind you for such crime:D. :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Guihardrock:
SORRY? its the first time i talk to give an opinion* so shut up and eat your words.

*opinion=something to help the other users, so the only spammer is...YOU:victory::victory::victory: congratulations

returning to important things 4.4.3 arrive :) slimrom but...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] obayda.bd:
:D:D ha ha...very funny...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
4.4.3 is a 1st April joke...wake up :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] HorstiG:
It's a Joke?

HGT - Galaxy S3 blue - Fusion-Boeffla KK
[Galaxy S III Android Development] obayda.bd:
Oh god..how we will believe anyone today?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Guihardrock:
Sure? Hahahahha I feel silly now hahaha
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cheese458:
Wait... So when's the update? Haha
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
you have modded your build.prop file!! :laugh::laugh:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] HorstiG:
Yes ;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] kasperok:
Is anyone having problem with bluetooth phone call?

Randomly, when connected to my BT car I got "alien voice" in phone call.. instead audio streaming have no problem!

any clue?

ps. (dualbooting) with other rom and same devices I have no problem..

tnx
[Galaxy S III Android Development] PacketJ:
Just wanna report a halo bug. Some apps are launched full screen like viber etc.

Thanks
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
Halo development is stopped. Now ParanoidAndroid Team replaced it with Hover... :)

Inviato dal mio Beanstalked i9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] faisus:
Wen can da new release b xpected:thumbup::thumbup:

Beanstalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
Who is this guy? :silly:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] faisus:
Guyy :D

Beanstalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] :
the time when my girlfriend stops messing with my system
[Galaxy S III Android Development] dark'em:
Considering a woman's behavior in a relationship, this may never happen :D:D:D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] faisus:
Lol :beer:

Beanstalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] d_ave:
Hello everybody, just switched from temasek's Rom and i'm very happy to find everything I use working fine in beanstalk together with a wonderful battery life:)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
Welcome to the BEST ROM for our S3! :D

Send from mine i9300 with Beanstalk + Boeffla
[Galaxy S III Android Development] athankar75:
Any way to answer call with home button?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Superuser_x:
Best battery life, no doubt!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] BioVolt:
All those reporting best battery results, can you please advise if you are using default kernel or if you using custom, which custom? Many thanks for responses.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Superuser_x:
I am using the default kernel.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
Default kernel works well for me :victory:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
Using boeffla omni (i need zram at all cost) with df settings and here no problems of battery. Do you like beanstalk mate?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] BioVolt:
I installed it fur few mins the other day but didn't have the time to fully test and had to restore my fusion backup because I needed my phone up and running, so too early to tell.

I definitively felt like there were things missing, but then again, no 2 ROMs should be exactly the same.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] _Negan_:
There are few things less like appbar and random choice for animation effects but all that this ROM has (and is much) work perfectly. Like for example lock screen buttons remapping. No 1 bug founded here so this has become my daily driver. I think that coming from fusion if you don't want to loose app you can dirty install this ROM without problems. System and preload I think are formatted when installing. But give this ROM a deep try at least until fusion update because it worth. Is surely one of the 2 best ROMs for gs3.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] vd69:
Very nice rom indeed. Does someone knows how to answer call with home button thanks.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] :
guys can nybody install the game Heros order and Chaos and see if it is working + second thing is build.prop editor working for you guys .. please check it..
[Galaxy S III Android Development] gamin92:
Tried the game, working fine here.

I don't use build.prop editor.

Since 255 or 270 Youtube app is not working for me. It just crashes when trying to launch. OG Youtube works.

Edit : Youtube working now, was because of Youtube AdAway Xposed module not updated...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] dark'em:
Build.prop only works if you we flash boeffla kernel, on the rom kernel, or googyMax it never worked for me, it selects some of my options but after reboot they go back to the way they wore, but still one of the best roms for S3 :good:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] SignalX:
after flashing BeanStalk-4.4.275, my BeanStalk version is still BeanStalk-4.4.270 in about panel

why?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] muadtdd02:
:( me too!

I did wipe but...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
Last 275 version is only a bugfix release and the developer doesn't update build.prop file...