yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] celticpride34:
mattnmag,

oh thank you for getting back to me, I'm now working on a deadline here, Verizon is sending me another warranty replacement and they want this junker back tomorrow, if not yesterday.

So yes, I kept it on 4.1.2 VRAMC3 and used the Casual "NoYouVerizon R515" tool without a hitch. It worked flawlessly for a few hours and as I was restoring prior apps and what not the screen died.

So after waiting to decide when to do it I just took the plunge. Followed the guide, Odin worked fine, I got a visual basic runtime execution at the end, but everything seems to have gone smoothly. Finally got the Green PASS! (7:24) reading. I heard the phone reboot and it went right into the OS. The weird thing is there was a notification sound from the last time I booted it up when I got an email, so I know it was from that email that I hadnt checked. So it didnt reformat the user data, Im guessing. The phone was recognized in windows 7 and when I went into the directory of the phone storage and there was still a TWRP and Rom toolbox folder but in the TWRP there was only a backup folder, no recovery, so Im assuming it is off there. Im guessing I may have to do a data wipe via the (now stock) android recovery? This should be cool, right? I thought odin would be able to wipe everything? I used "Auto-Reboot, Re-Partition and F. Reset time as the only options checked in Odin. Or would you not worry about cleaning it any more? Even if they see my root apps, they probably wont look for them and wont care, since I no longer have root or TWRP.

The last idea I have now is to take it to the samsung kiosk and have the guy flash it to 4.3, but I'm not sure if it will take it because I'm not sure how "official" this flash was. It would give me peace of mine if I could get good ol' KNOX on there but I'm scared of it bricking for some reason.

The only option I can think of with regards to seeing things is to use a MHL adapter (mico usb to hdmi) but I have neither the time or money to buy one now. I'm really happy this process went well, I just wanna be sure that it's as innocent a P.O.S. as possible before sending back to them.

I really appreciate you getting back to me, I was totally throwing out the bat signal here. I've done some stupid stuff to my devices over the years but this certainly isnt one of them. I dont want 4.3 and its crap and everything was perfect until the screen died. Just horrible luck. I wont be able to swallow the pill of being charged their $299 fee for returning a "user-broken" device which is certainly not the case here.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] celticpride34:
Here's the Odin log too. I haven't used Odin before this, I used to do flashing and whatnot through CWM. It's still weird to me that it didn't do a full blown factory reset level wipe. I was really hoping it would boot into the setup wizard screen, like how I received the phone yesterday. I keep forgetting that the first thing they'll do after fixing the screen, should they accept it, is to wipe the device wholly. I just wanna be sure it's sterile enough for them to not claim that I rooted and voided my warranty.

<ID:0/005> Added!!

<OSM> Enter CS for MD5..

<OSM> Check MD5.. Do not unplug the cable..

<OSM> Please wait..

<OSM> KIES_HOME_I605VRAMC3_I605VZWAMC3_1098177_REV04_user_low_ship.tar.md5 is valid.

<OSM> Checking MD5 finished Sucessfully..

<OSM> Leave CS..

<ID:0/005> Odin v.3 engine (ID:5)..

<ID:0/005> File analysis..

<ID:0/005> SetupConnection..

<ID:0/005> Initialzation..

<ID:0/005> Set PIT file..

<ID:0/005> DO NOT TURN OFF TARGET!!

<ID:0/005> Get PIT for mapping..

<ID:0/005> Firmware update start..

<ID:0/005> boot.img

<ID:0/005> NAND Write Start!!

<ID:0/005> recovery.img

<ID:0/005> system.img

<ID:0/005> modem.bin

<ID:0/005> cache.img

<ID:0/005> hidden.img

<ID:0/005> sboot.bin

<ID:0/005> tz.img

<ID:0/005> RQT_CLOSE !!

<ID:0/005> RES OK !!

<ID:0/005> Removed!!

<ID:0/005> Remain Port .... 0

<OSM> All threads completed. (succeed 1 / failed 0)

<ID:0/004> Added!!

<ID:0/004> Removed!!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] mattnmag:
@ celticpride34,

It looks like the ODIN factory restore worked for you and it should have wiped the device fully and restored it to locked/factory settings.

Are you sure that the TWRP and ROM Toolbox folders you see are not on your external SD card?

As far as hearing an email notification sound when it rebooted.... that has me stumped. Maybe it was a text message notification. Can you log into your Verizon account online and see if you got any new text messages around time time you finished restoring it?

If you have time, it seems like it would be ok to redo the Odin restore method one more time -- just to make sure it did a full wipe and restore.... but it sounds like it should have worked and your Odin log looks like it did work.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] celticpride34:
Yeah, see, that's what I was thinking, too.

I havent had an SD card in there since the screen died. The TWRP / toolbox folder is on the internal memory.

And the sound notification cant be from a text because theres no SIM in it. Its gotta be from email, which means my wifi and gmail settings are still locked in there.

The only real good thing is that I'm pretty sure the recovery is stock android again, I was able to boot into recovery mode and reboot by just pressing power, as the first option in recovery is reboot system now. I dont think TWRP does the same thing. Plus there is no recovery folder any more, as there was.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] celticpride34:
So I flashed again with Odin, still left the file system and user data intact for some reason.

I then went into recovery and was able to do a factory wipe, it IS stock android recovery as I was totally able to navigate in the dark by seeing how many presses to give judging by my old GNex and my current 4.3 broken note.

Plugged it in and the internal has been wiped completely clean!!

The verizon guys will have a completely bare phone now, fresh off a factory wipe from me!

And if they have issues or suspect anything I can simply say it was a privacy issue.

I still wish I could see the screen if not for only a second to see what actual state the phone is in.

I have a feeling it's back at the initial setup/welcome screen as when I turn off the screen and turn it back on it doesn't give the water droplet sound when dragging my finger across, but it does make it when I tap, maybe I'm hitting the buttons in the setup?

But anyways, I'm off to ship this bastard off. Thanks for your help man and really your reassurance.

I think/hope I'll be alright with this because my new replacement note will arrive any time now and I really have to root it too, just to stop the 4.3 update from coming. I think I'll turn off all the radios on it and play some movies for a while to make sure the screen doesnt die. Or maybe give Verizon a week or 2 to yell at me and charge me 3 bills if, for some reason, this didnt work and they find out. I dont wanna turn around, root this one, it break and be out 600$

I just saw the note II 4.1.2 in your signature, lol.

Man...

I'm envious.

So I'm assuming you rooted and froze the 3 update associated apps as well?

Or is it true that once you root, you don't need to do anything to FWupgrade, keychain and SDW (i think) because it wont update anyways?

And just curious, what root method did you use?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] celticpride34:
Awesome, man. I was actually looking on Swappa for a while at note 3's, since the 4.3 kerfuffle but that's just more money that I don't have right now. I'm kinda lost too, as to how it didnt get fully wiped in Odin but I'm happy with how I was able to get stock recovery on and a full reset through that, without the aid of being able to see anything, lol. Not sure how Verizon will handle it, it was a warranty replacement and I already have my new one that came today, up and running wonderfully. They wont send that one back to me, just fix the screen and reflash it and send it off to someone else, I'm guessing/hoping.

I'm gonna do the casual root again, I just wanna give it a week or so, to see if they call me on rooting it or to find out if this one is hardware defective, before rooting again. It's so challenging not rooting it right now, let me tell you. I wish I could've seen that the unroot worked though. I don't doubt it did, but Im not sure if the bootloader was locked or if there was a custom recovery flag or something.

I wasnt really expecting to get all crazy with Roms, to be honest I got pretty sick of the beta testing with my Galaxy Nexus but I do know that there are many good roms out there for the Note and I'll probably give some a shot in a while after the dust settles. I've heard Jedi is a real good rom for it and I was always partial to Liquid and AOKP roms (and I too rocked Faux's kernals, the guy is a G!). I really want to get that note 3 s-pen functionality, their air controls are just sexy as hell (not sure if it's possible though).

Thanks again for all your help mattnmag. I've seen that guide for a while, and other guides and pit files and md5s, etc etc but I'm glad I settled on that one and I think I just needed someone to push me to go through with it. I'm certainly glad I didnt send it back in the state that it was in before.

Thanks again--

Be well, and cheers!
[General Questions and Answers] jatin100:
I recently rooted my samsung galaxy grand quattro i8552 with the "kingo root android software". After rooting the wifi is partially working.But google play store is showing server error.but all other apps that require internet access is working perfectly fine (except geography quiz game 3d) and my both browsers(chrome and dolphin) are also working perfectly.so please help me in fixing google play SERVER ERROR.

Thanks In Advance
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] westside90i:
korea p600 wifi and p605s/k/l update NB1

still 4.3 but

i heared this situation fix https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qqIPWYIpHE

and smooth ,fast

download link sm-p600 NB1 replace down link

http://www.innoloud.com:82/SAMSUNG/Galaxy Note 10.1/P600KXUANB1_P600KOOANB1_HOME.tar

http://www.innoloud.com:82/SAMSUNG/Galaxy Note 10.1/P600KXUANB1_P600KOOANB1HOME.tar

http://www.innoloud.com:82/SAMSUNG/Galaxy Note 10.1/
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] nickwarn:
You have download link for this? Or a source that says that this is available for download? NB1, i guess that would be february 2014. Would love to get my hands on a new firmware, im starving...:)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] westside90i:
smooth

I Flash NB1

veryveryvery smooth than ml1 mj3

plz wait i upload
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] C2Q:
Can't watch the video posted right now but what issue does this fix? Is it the long tap shaking issue?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] nickwarn:
Do you also have the 605 version? Or if you could link to it, I would be thankfull
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] westside90i:
as far as I know(correct express? sorry i am not good at english) korea p605s/k/l different global p605
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] westside90i:
download link sm-p600 NB1

http://lap.so/wzaa
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] nickwarn:
Yeah, they should be but I think the 605s only has less LTE bands then 605. But im not sure, thank you anyways.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] pakxelaos:
How to flash ? I download it and flash by ODIN twice both fail
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] cantfindanick:
video is actually long tap press issue, which exist in many many android devices caused by not properly calibrated or poor hardware it is not really related to new update
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] edouble312:
this file host is giving me issues. I've downloaded 893mb and now it has slowed to 10kb/s which i think will probably error out soon.

It doesn't tell me the size of the entire file, it just comes in as it downloads (does that make sense?). Maybe a checksum?

If anyone knows the actual size of the completed file, that would be useful.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] edouble312:
don't flash this on a US p600.

with no odin pda for my model to flash back to stock, I now have updated the firmware, bootloader and recovery to the Korean p600 update. that killed my wifi unfortunately and possibly some other things I haven't noticed yet.

any ideas how to get the old firmware back? :(

edit: I'm downloading the Taiwan ML1 firmware. hopefully it'll flash correctly and work. I'll report back

edit 2: back in business after flashing ML1. whew. won't make this mistake again
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] alexcarterkarsus:
Huh? Where did you find the UK ml1?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] edouble312:
Sorry, it was Taiwan. wrong country code.

http://samsung-updates.com/device/?id=SM-P600
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] GliTCH82:
First of all I apologize if this is a repost.

Apparently there are several people on here who aren't quite sure how Direct Push works, what the heartbeat is, and why you can't just set your Pocket Outlook to check for mail every 5 minutes and get the same results. I've seen several posts with people claiming they did this and accomplished the same results, but don't be fooled.

Microsoft's Direct Push doesn't check for e-mail every 5 minutes. It doesn't check for e-mail every minute, and in fact, it doesn't check for e-mail at all.

Taken from:

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials...ng-Part1-Microsoft-DirectPush-technology.html

Put differently, Direct Push is truly a push system, it doesn't query the Exchange server for e-mail but rather gives the server the ability to send the message to the device by maintaining an active data connection for listening purposes. If there's no e-mail, there's no data being sent and there's no battery being wasted.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] IdeaDirect:
thanks for explaining

That makes sense. So if my phone is checking every 5 minutes, it is wasting battery and data if no email is there. Whereas true push is actually only used when their is an email resulting in lower battery and data consumption. That makes a lot of sense.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] jayjay:
One might say that battery efficience should be better with push, as long as you get mail less often than every five minutes :)

In our hectic society, this is not that rare. In fact most working people in the computer business (who would be the ones owning these devices) are probably getting more mail than that.

A push-event might last less time than a full-blown poll, so it's hard to measure. I didn't experience any increase or decrease in battery life-time when I switched from polling to pushing.

-J
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] risidoro:
Thanks for the explanation Glitch82, just a question:

what the f*ck is an heartbeat???

The article says:

no data will travel over the wire, unless a change is detected in the mailbox, or the heartbeat expires.

So how much data is exchanged when a heartbeat is sent, and when do heartbeats expire?

Thanks,

Isidoro

EDIT: ok, i've read the article. The heartbeats are pings sent by the ppc to the server. It is not clear how much does one ping last but it seems it should be about 15-30 minutes. Yep, direct push should be better than poutlook scheduling, if you own an Exchange Server of course.

Bye
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] geoffreycross:
I think this is actually a little bit wrong as a 'push' client doesn't need to re-authenticate every time it receives notification of a new message.

So the correct version would be closer to this:

Scenario 1 using pushing:

00:00:01 --> 1 email message received by Exchange server

00:00:03 --> Device alerted to new email

*00:00:04 --> Device authenticates with Exchange

#00:00:06 --> 1 email message delivered

00:05:05 --> Ping sent to Exchange by device

00:10:05 --> Ping sent to Exchange by device

00:15:05 --> Ping sent to Exchange by device

00:17:15 --> 1 email message received by Exchange server

00:17:17 --> Device alerted to new email

#00:17:20 --> 1 email message delivered

Scenario 1 using polling:

00:00:01 --> 1 email message received by POP3 server

*00:02:00 --> Device authenticates with POP3

#00:02:02 --> 1 email message delivered

*00:07:02 --> Device authenticates with POP3

00:07:03 --> No e-mail messages delivered

*00:12:03 --> Device authenticates with POP3

00:12:04 --> No e-mail messages delivered

*00:17:04 --> Device authenticates with POP3

00:17:05 --> No e-mail messages delivered

00:17:15 --> 1 email message received by POP3 server

*00:22:05 --> Device authenticates with POP3

#00:22:07 --> 1 email message delivered

So in this case we've got *## for push and *****## for poll.

Scenario 2 using pushing:

00:00:01 --> 1 email message received by Exchange server

00:00:03 --> Device alerted to new email

*00:00:04 --> Device authenticates with Exchange

#00:00:06 --> 1 email message delivered

00:02:15 --> 1 email message received by Exchange server

00:02:17 --> Device alerted to new email

#00:02:20 --> 1 email message delivered

00:03:01 --> 1 email message received by Exchange server

00:03:03 --> Device alerted to new email

#00:03:06 --> 1 email message delivered

00:04:15 --> 1 email message received by Exchange server

00:04:17 --> Device alerted to new email

#00:04:20 --> 1 email message delivered

Scenario 2 using polling:

00:00:01 --> 1 email message received by POP3 server

00:02:15 --> 1 email message received by POP3 server

00:03:01 --> 1 email message received by POP3 server

00:04:15 --> 1 email message received by POP3 server

*00:05:00 --> Device authenticates with POP3

####00:05:08 --> 4 email message delivered

And here they would be exactly the same with *####.

Now the case were polling DOES win over push is when you very very rarely get email for two reasons:

1) Push does require you to 'ping' the server from time to time and whilst this requires almost no data / battery it does add up over a long period.

2) If the connection is lost because you went through a tunnel or something then you will need to completely re-start the connection which does involve a new authentication.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] GliTCH82:
Now that's definitely interesting.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] yozh:
I got a question here, I just signed up for an account with mail2web.com a free exchange hosting service and I setup the device to sync with it, I also set that the device will sync when "As itemsarrive", so now I sent my self an email and I only get it on my device about 3-4 minutes later some times right away but sometimes few minutes apart, now my question is, do I have to keep GPRS always on ? Does this happen to the free service mail2web ? Or is this a normal thing what Im seeing ?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] jayjay:
Main reason I love push is that my mobile phone gets the mail long before it arrives in outlook, which is polling. I like to know the minute I get some mails.

Then at night, when I receive the occasional spam through the filter, it irritates me that the phone always beeps loudly each time. I am used to it, but I keep thinking it wakes up my gf.

I would like to have some kind of "only push during the day" -feature or time-dependent adjustment of sms arrival sound ;) I can't turn the volume of completely, since the phone is also my alarm clock. I guess I could turn the device off completely (and hope that the alarm wakes it up). I am just too used to the S100 that I had before this, which didn't have any "off-mode".

-J
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] Southern_Man:
Re: Why Direct Push uses less battery than check every X min

Have a look at this article:

http://www.geekzone.co.nz/content.asp?contentid=5915
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] GliTCH82:
Well you can trade the inconvenience of waking up to spam at 3 AM with the inconvenience of remembering to hit the Comm button to turn off Direct Push right before bed, and then remembering to turn it back on in the morning. ;)

That's actually a dilemma. Maybe you could set an alarm to remind you to turn Direct Push on.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] GliTCH82:
Actually, in ActiveSync you can set a synchronization schedule. Have you looked into that?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] GliTCH82:
Re: Why Direct Push uses less battery than check every X min

Very informative, thanks for the link!
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] yozh:
Well I dont know about the battery part, but Im using directpush and now its all working fine, but the battery goes down like crazy I took the phone of the charger this morning at 7:30am its now 10:10am and the battery is at 96% I didnt not make any phone calls or browes the net just got 6-8 emails and thats it, so thats kind of pretty bad for the battery life.....
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] yozh:
No one eleses battery dies taht fast ?

btw its 11:50 and the battery is at 84% I havent made 1 phone call yet or browsed anything just got bunch more emails maybe like 10 more or so

so total 20 email and battery is down 16% hmmmm wonder if the checking every 20 minutes is better
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] eagle63:
Hey guys, I'm coming in to this thread late but I thought I'd bring something to y'alls attention.

I'm a Sprint 6700 user (HTC Apache) and have been experimenting with Direct Push with a free Exchange account at mail2web.com. Here's what I've discovered:

For some reason, when connected to mail2web there is data activity occurring every 60 seconds. This happens consistently, and is repeatable. When not connected to mailweb, OR when connected to another Exchange server (such as 4smarphone.com) this 60-second data activity does NOT occur.

I've tested this thoroughly, and have confirmed with many other 6700 users as well as Verizon Treo700w users that they are ALL seeing the same behavior. I brought this to mail2web's attention and went through their support channels. Unfortunately, they were never able to recreate this and therefore can't do anything about it. I don't think the problem is with Exchange, as the heartbeats seem to be happening every 8 minutes or so like they're supposed to. (we analyzed the ActiveSync logs to confirm this) I think the issue might be with their firewall timing out or something, but if course that's a guess.

You can see this data activity happening just by staring at the "connection arrows" at the top of the display. Like clockwork, they go from gray to white (inactive to active) every 60 seconds. No other apps are using my data connection in the background, and as soon as I disconnect from mail2web the data arrows stay gray virtually indefinitely.

This causes major problems for 2 reasons: First, it's a huge drain on the battery. In my informal tests I saw a fully charged device drain down to 50% battery over the span of 7 hours doing absolutely nothing except sitting their connected to mail2web. (no emails being received either) These same tests when connected to 4smartphone caused the battery to be at 90% after the same span of 7 hours.

The other problem is that if you're a CDMA user and are not in an EVDO area, calls go directly to VM when there's data activity happening.

I'm not sure if this of any interest to anyone here, but I thought I'd bring it up because I believe it's a real problem and if enough people complain to mail2web then maybe they'll do something about it. Thanks for reading.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] yozh:
Thanks eagle63, this actually explains alot.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] Romp:
Which is why I use AUTD (Always Up To Date).

With the exception of people who get emails every two minutes, AUTD is very efficient, not requiring any connection until an email is recieved.

Basically, what it does (if you don't already know) is sends a "control" SMS to you that triggers ActiveSync to connect and get your update.

Exchange sends an SMS message when there is a change. No new emails, no connections, no data tranferred at all.

Takes 3 to 10 seconds from recieving the email to it showing up on my phone. Of course, your plan had better cover the SMS messages you are going to get...