[Xposed Framework Modules] RadarNyan:
Sorry about my post made you feel that way, I didn't mean to. Just let me be clear about somethings:

I understand that ActivityForceNewTask is a very powerful module and may break things.

Yes, I know some people may use this module without reading, and may blame this module for the result, things like this happens all the time, nearly under every comment section of any power tools, really seen them enough.

I'm neither complaining about I have to do extra work nor asking the developer to do more work

If there is whitelist, then it's very easy to make it a blacklist or remove it, not to say it's already done and released in the previous version. am I wrong? Actually I myself prefer to use whitelist as well as you recommend it, it just doesn't make any sense to enable this module for activities doesn't need to be opened in new tasks.

But the configuration of this module just too complicate -

1. Enable log 2. Open the activity with any method you can 3. Switch back to configure page and open logs 4. add the logs to list (true, the latest version made it a little easier to find the desired activity but doesn't really shorten this whole process) 5. Disable logging. this process isn't hard but quickly becomes annoying(mainly because of the switching between apps) when you have to repeat it for 5 or more times, even if I don't have to turn on/off logging during the process. I tried to open them at once and find it really annoying to search for an activity in the long log list...

Actually I'm very happy to play with xposed module configurations, for example: App Settings, very useful and easy to configure - 1. Find the app you want to modify 2.Make your modifications 3. Save settings, done. And this process

doesn't need a single task switch.

I'm not asking the developer to make this configuration process as easy as App Settings(How dare I?) and the simplest way to solve this problem is to do this configuration only for the apps may broken - among all my installed 200+ apps, only found Google Settings had this problem(which I remember clearly that it was announced both in xposed installer download section and this support thread. If the same thing was done with SuperSU, I think it won't be so many duplicate reports) and I don't even use it that often, I can just leave it alone and turn off the module by the quick switch.

I could just revert to old versions (Thanks to Xposed Repo) but I didn't. I tried this new version, tried to understand the using of whitelist (and yes, I do understand that force whitelist by default can help reduce those nonsense reports to other developers). I spent half an hour to configure the whitelist even the process is boring (I have different browsers, e-mail clients and other apps like G+ & Play store...), then I'm here to ask the question: not "why whitelist by default"(again, I fully agree whitelist as default) but "why only whitelist" - or in other words "why remove the non/blacklist option". If wondering about those nonsense comments so much, just simply add an warning like

Enabling this module for all activities may break certain app, please temporary disable this module by check "Disable Module" in configuration page and try again before report bugs to app developer

As for Google,

IMO, I think they have been closing up Android for quite a while. So many apps now days requires Google's API, would run on any Android Device without Google service framework; The new runtme ART has become the default value in AOSP code that almost "killed" the current xposed framework. It's not like we break things that Google won't alow us (what's the meaning of opensource if we're not allowed to break things anyway?)