yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] opiujn:
I'm trying this kernel out with Cassies v4 rom, its tw based, 4.2.2. Flashed kernel with TWRP. But I'm sure CWM will do perfectly fine too, or for example mobile Odin. Don't forget to do a nandroid backup first, as always.. how safe flashing might seem to be, it's a good thing to have a backup :)
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] VeEuzUKY:
Thanks for the reply, and shazzl, thanks for the Kernel!

Installed and almost all going strong.. here is some quick feedback on my GT-I9205 with stock 4.2.2 ROM:

Most seems good and stable at maximum 2106GHz overclocked frequency. I'm using SETCPU & OnDemand Governor. Didn't change voltages. Things are definitely faster and smoother. So far system feels very stable. Antutu, Quadrant & most apps all work well. A few (including Geekbench) crash/self-close on launch. Reducing maximum clock speed to 1998GHz, solves all problems.

Great Kernel. Been waiting for this since I got my Mega!

Shazzl, U da man:) :) :)
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] kairi_zeroblade:
ok so it seems my source was used..i was not given credit at all..oh crap..people nowadays really do not know the term respect..nvm..hard lesson learned again thrice..i was planning to port the double tap to wake feature from HTC kernels but seems i am scraping it all off..

i am very dissappointed.. :(
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] Silesh.Nair:
If this is true, report it. It will get taken down. Rather than scraping things off and not allowing the community to benefit from your work for one person's fault. Just my take on it.

You have the power to decide. Good luck..
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
I not yet update the op yet due to sorry [MENTION=3637908]kairi_zeroblade[/MENTION] you are not been forget u are my 1 sifu... to used github..
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] Grarak:
You have to expect this espeacially on kernels and you didn't give proper credits neither.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
I update at op using my phone... I have some health problem after im recover I will update at op..... and source and credits..thank
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
update op if i forget to mention any please let me know
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] moosiemooses:
I click the link...no zip. Am I missing something?
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
To to destop view then file download
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] moosiemooses:
Thank you. That worked. Just sat on boot screen on the SPH-L600.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
is it work on SPH-L600??

Sent from my GT-I9205
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] moosiemooses:
No. Wouldnt get pass the Sprint boot screen. Wish I did.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
Though so it have a loki.. I don't put it....

Sent from my GT-I9205
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] kermanp:
Hi...

I'd really love to see a working custom kernel with oc functions on my Mega 6,3", but yet no luck.

I tried this kernel with three different roms. Cassies v4, MegaFireMj2 v2 & v3 with no luck.

Phone goes to bootloop before showing the bootanimation on every rom.

And this is not my first time flashing rom or kernel to my phone... ;)

Any constructive ideas?

Or is there a new version coming from this kernel that isn't binded to a certain rom/version of it?

Sent from my GT-I9205
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
So wired [MENTION=1791695]yusopa[/MENTION] try it and it boot.... this kernel support CML1 only I think.... his because it have selinux security
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] kermanp:
Ok...

So if I get this right, I should try with selinux enabled rom?

Sent from my GT-I9205
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] yusopa:
Yes it boot latest i try in kangburra rom also boot. I try latest rom megalomanic also boot. For sure CML1 baseband is mandatory.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] starmaster10:
[MENTION=5086062]shazzl[/MENTION] thought i would stop by and say keep up the good work you have done so far on this project. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
New Version will be out soon

Gpu oc up to 627. Gpu Voltage control,
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
version 1.1 is out

change log

gpu oc up to 627

some tweek.

and remove faux sound control not actualy working.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] davecurtain:
Hi shazzl, thanks for your good work! How can I get rid of the 2 red lines when booting each time?
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] Silesh.Nair:
You cannot. It denotes that you are not using a stock kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
I read somethink about it at htc forum some one have disabele....
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] davecurtain:
I see, thanks for replying.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] imvito:
Try the v1 and V1.1, has the same problem, after the call, all sounds disappear, the phone becomes silent, to restart then sound will came back
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
Thank fo the information I will try to fix it..
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] VeEuzUKY:
Same problem here with the sound. Thanks for the great Kernel and your great work on the Mega! I am using SetCPU (my favotire app) and can only change CPU clock..cant access GPU control . Any suggestions for an alternative app to also control the GPU other than Trickster MOD? Its very confusing to use and doesnt seem to work very well for me.. thanks again shazzl!
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] shazzl:
You can used trickster for gpu oc and select gov for gpu
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] thomkat:
Same problem for me with the sound, V 1.1

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9205
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] adakaya1994:
Thanks for great kernel, any news about sound problem?

And is there anybody tried kernel on I9200 is kernel working? (Tried and yes kernel is working)
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] jotekman:
Doesnt seem to have been any movement on this in a while? Is it in stasis? Dead? :) just asking...
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] MiCmAsTa:
could not get the MAX CPU (2106MHz) to work on the V1.1
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] adithya11:
Can i use this kernel on my GT-I9152 ? Thanks :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] snatch666:
i9200 4.4.2 stock firmware not working.

for sharing thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] Zeuszoos:
Hello,

Samsung Galaxy (SGH-M819N) Mega

KitKat 4.4.4, MegaKat ROM

MegaKat is basically the Samsung ROM, tweaked for speed.

I AM ABSOLUTELY DESPERATE for an OverClocking Kernel for my phone!!! Does anyone know if this, or any OverClocking Kernel will work on my phone and where I can get it, PLEASE???

Thanks!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] Morningstar:
I'm having a strange problem, and I'm really hoping someone might have an answer, because it's driving me crazy...

I'm not able to buy anything through the Play Store (including in-app purchases). Every time I try to it tells me "This payment method has been declined", regardless of what method I choose (Play Store credit, Google Wallet, Bill to carrier, and 4 valid cards I have saved). I can't even 'purchase' free items (ie. free music tracks).

I'm also having an issue with the Google Wallet app, in that I can't add funds. Every time I try, regardless of how I try to add them (tried 3 valid cards), it tells me I cannot send money with Google Wallet.

I'm running Echoe v6 (international ROM), and everything was working fine, until yesterday. I made a full backup in TWRP, flashed a couple other ROMs I wanted to try, and finally did a full wipe and restored the TWRP backup I had made. Ever since restoring I've been having these problems, though everything else is working exactly how it was prior to backing up/restoring.

I've tried clearing data/cache for both Play Store and Wallet, deleted and re-added my credit cards on a PC, and still nothing. If anyone has ANY ideas or suggestions, they would be GREATLY appreciated.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] Morningstar:
Well, nevermind. After countless attempts throughout the day, both my Play Store and Google Wallet have started working normally again... Weird...
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] jramirez05:
I have been having the same problem. I have no clue on whats going on. I was having problems with it when i had my rooted S3. Now that i have my Note 3 non rooted same exact problem your having. I've tried everything and nothing. Is there anything specific that you remember doing that made it start working?? I am to the point where i am cursing at the phone now. Any advsied or hints will help. Thanks.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] Morningstar:
Unfortunately, I don't think anything I did fixed it. I'm thinking it was some sort of issue with my account on Google's end, that ended up resolving itself.

I had spent hours messing with it, finally got so pissed off/frustrated that I turned the phone off, plugged it in, and did some work on my laptop. When I came back to the phone about 4 hours later, it was working again. During that time, I went to the Google Wallet site from my Palm and deleted a few old, unused cards from it, but I don't think that had anything to do with the problems I was having.

I wish I could offer you more help, but I can't. Good luck though!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] jramirez05:
Thanks anyway man. Yeah this issue has been frustrating me for a good couple of weeks now. I don't really buy much on the play store but now that i do want to purchase something it is just pissing me off. I think I'm going to contact Google see if they can help or something.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] el_garicimo:
I'm having this problem too, says my card is declined when trying to add money to my Google Wallet. Just called the bank, they don't have anything showing my card being rejected, so it looks like it may be a problem on Google's end
[Moto X Q&A] pingpong1109:
This is kinda a question and a discussion starter.

The Moto X has allot going for it above other phones:

-It has great battery life

-It has features aimed at the general consumer and keeps the interface looking pretty while doing it

-It has the Moto Maker

-It looks beautiful and unique (wood backs anyone?)

-The price is great for the specs

-The screen is bright and clear despite being only 720p

-Aiming at the everyday consumers not just the geeker consumers

-The marketing budget I think was close to 500 million (I may be wrong)

-It is on all carriers, and has big displays in all their stores (when I was looking around my area at carrier's stores to see if this is true a couple of stores had people actually were looking at the Moto X with delight)

-It has several other small features like fast updates and a decent camera

-Insert other things I forgot to add of what it has going for it

So my question is this. With all these things going for it why wasn't it successful? It is a phone that could have competed with the likes of Samsung and Apple and would have done well doing so, this has always confused me.

Sent from my Moto X which is better than the S4 or HTC One
[Moto X Q&A] EVOSerb:
1. Most people like high end specs which the phone kinda lacks.

2. Not enough exposure in media

Motorola did a great job with moto x. I hope they continue with it.
[Moto X Q&A] Steve-x:
I have no idea where they spent that marketing budget but the blame has to rest solely on them. So many tech and industry people agree the Moto X was one of the top devices or the top device of 2013. The engineering team who designed it should be extremely proud of the design and features. It really was a total let down in the advertising department - they really needed to push touchless control and active notifications.
[Moto X Q&A] flashallthetime:
Comes down to sammy and apple, those 2 brands seem to be in peoples minds , cool & hip. If you have neither you're second class. I was offered an s4 from Rogers which would have cost me less but I just preferred the feel of how the moto felt in my hands, nor did I want to follow the herd. bah bah bah bah

Sent on my Gummy running Lenoto X
[Moto X Q&A] Konno_Yuuki:
Here's what I think. While people know about Motorola, they know Samsung and Apple better. Just about everyone I've talked to knows who Samsung is and what they make for the most part. The Galaxy S series is very popular and has a lot of media attention. The Moto X didn't get a lot of this and MotoMaker even less. Apple on the other hand has a loyal crowd. Macintosh is one of the top three operating systems and a good chunk of those that use Macs are going to to pick up an iPhone because it's an Apple product.

I work as an indirect cell phone retailer (basically I sell AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, and a lot of prepaid). When I talk with a customer, almost all of them know about the newest Samsung Galaxy S and/or the newest iPhone. I will also get customers the come in and ask "what's the best phone?" (I love getting asked this) I'll try to ask questions to help find a phone that fits their needs, but most will just pick the phone with the most features, specs, or the simplest to operate.

The thing is, most of us here probably spend a good amount of time looking into the phones we're interested in. We learn what works, doesn't work, how optimized (or not) the system is, and so on. We here are generally the minority of cell phone consumers. Those that have done their "homework" don't come to me asking what phone to get. They generally get the phone themselves and usually off-contract. The majority of consumers will get a familiar named phone that has features and high specs, even if a mid-range phone that's optimized can out perform it.
[Moto X Q&A] Jason.DROID:
I think I'm gonna start referring to the iPhone 5S as a midrange device with its 640p screen, dual-core processor, and 1GB of RAM. I don't think 1080p would be beneficial in a 4.7" screen. Offloading the sensor and voice data to tailored DSPs was a smart choice too.

Anyway, it takes time to chip away at the big names like Samsung and Apple.

Where the 2013 Nexus 7 gets praise for its quad-core Snapdragon S4 Pro (a rebadged S600), the Moto X gets derided for its dual-core S4 Pro (also using most of the S600 internals). People think it's old hardware, but it's not. That was another uphill battle for Motorola.
[Moto X Q&A] Restola:
A better camera would have resulted in my wife and sister both getting one. I can deal with it, they can't.

However for the first time in years I was asked "what kind of phone is that" by someone. the cashier at home Depot when they were scanning my return email off my phone. "I like the size, it's not huge".

I think moto is (was) off to a great start with a new line of phones with great performance and not huge. Hell the new galaxy s5 is going to be as big as the note at 5.25". What iphoner is going to do that? Not my mom that's for sure. But the x could win those people over over the next few generations of devices.
[Moto X Q&A] Darth:
Yeah...I don't think Motorola failed as much as Samsung and apple succeeded.

People get iPhone and Samsung thrown at them in ads and word of mouth....so that's what they buy.

It will be hard to change that. Very. Look at iPhone. They've made no significant changes in years. Same old thing...just slightly quicker. But people are buying them...cause that's what their friends have. LOL

It may never change. The other makers can just hope to turn a profit at this point.....beating out the two giants will be a long haul.

Sent from my Moto X cellular telephone...
[Moto X Q&A] sicmadek:
The general public does know about devices like we do. If you asked most people if they knew what was different about the iPhone 5s they would say its gold and has a finger print scanner. Its all word of mouth really. Everybody at my work had I phones but one person bought a galaxy so now everyone else bought a galaxy. Once I go to work with my bamboo back x they will drool.

I have literally owned every smartphone that att has sold plus Nexus's. Moto x blows all of those phones away.
[Moto X Q&A] Jason.DROID:
Yeah, I can't even count the number of GS4 and GN3 variants there are internationally. Samsung sells their products EVERYWHERE. They have some serious market penetration, which partially explains their ridiculous sales numbers.

The rest is brand identity. Old Motorola shot themselves in the foot by not offering the same branded phone on every carrier. On Verizon, you could get a Droid RAZR HD, but on AT&T, it was its cousin the Atrix HD. There was no continous brand identity like there is now with the Moto X and Moto G. That helped Samsung build up their Galaxy line too.
[Moto X Q&A] kolyan:
Apple and Samsung have its OWN "shiny" stores in malls and stands in Best Buy. Apple was the first one to open cool stores, now Samsung is doing the same.

Moto X arrived in summer without motomaker and was like on 1 or 2 carriers in USA, months later it came to motomaker and was available on all carriers, and now half a year later its available internationally. Half a year is a long time, its already an "old" phone....we got G2, G Flex, and soon S5 coming out.
[Moto X Q&A] SymbioticGenius:
All I gotta say is... It's a marathon, not a foot race.

Motorola has broken into the smartphone game again, but they need tablets, phablets, laptops and wearables. They need to be competitive in every aspect of people's lives, then and only then will they gain the market share. That my friends will take time and support from us, the true Motorola fans.

MotoX GSM Developer Edition, Bootloader Unlocked, Rooted, Stock 4.4.2 Great Britain on T-Mobile !
[Moto X Q&A] rupterr:
Only available on AT&T as well. Bad move by Motorola.
[Moto X Q&A] Julianocas:
Really simple... money.

Samsung can spend tons of money on marketing, Apple doesn't necessarily needs (its just hype), but they also spend a lot...

Motorola have made the perfect phone, but it lacks on money for advertising and distribution...

That's why I'm please with Lenovo acquisition, they got tons and tons of money and, as it appears, they want to keep Motorola as it is but expand the market distribution.
[Moto X Q&A] eksasol:
They need to spend billions in ads campaign and have their super bowl commercials. The word "Motorola" doesn't really rhyme with hip. Another factor is the last two Moto phones are made for ergonomic use and price value, it's not the current fad. You can argue Apple is ergonomic, but the MotoX is lost in the sea of Android big screen phones. The current fad is subsidized 2 years contract and a 6" phablet with high end specs and bloatwares with poor software optimization.

Also MotoX and G just came out for a short time, they need more time to build up the 'Moto' name. There are only two devices now (that's how I see it), it's early days, eventually they'll have to make phablet and tablets as well.

sent via my Le Motonovo X
[Moto X Q&A] Turb0wned:
Only one real answer to this question, the rest of the answers like "specs" are not true (most customers don't know). Answer is marketing.
[Moto X Q&A] pingpong1109:
I don't know if that is true. I have seen several commercials about it. I may be wrong though.
[Moto X Q&A] sicmadek:
what are you talking about? moto x is available on pretty much every carrier in the us.

lenovo buying motorola will be very good for moto x sales moving forward. lenovo is the 3rd largest phone manufacturer and make very high quality ones at that. hopefully they only look to improve the moto x not change it.
[Moto X Q&A] herzzreh:
I'd say marketing (see iPhone) and most people are specs/benchmarks whores.
[Moto X Q&A] rupterr:
It was only available thru AT&T in the U.S. when initially released. It took a couple of months for the other carriers to get it. That's where Motorola failed.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] johndillinger1932:
I have the system folder, with all the apks for the NERV edition of the SH-06D. Can someone port this to work on our phone? I even deodexed the apks. but Id like the framework too. a full Note 2 Rom with most of these would be, well , amazing. heres the link to the Nexus forum where work is being done to get this fully working on that device..All the links to the files are in that thread.

http://xdaforums.com/nexus-4/help/req-evangelion-nerv-rom-port-sh06d-t2290194

On a whim I pushed all the apks to system/app folder..changed permissions..Seems like the only one that works is the google search bar.
[Sony Xperia S, Acro S, Ion] RockNation07:
Hi,

My Xperia is stuck on logo screen. itried to install custom rom but i don't have OS zip file on my sdcard. so i cant install the os. Cannot copy files to sdcard as its not recoganised. I can still connect my phone in fastboot mode

Please give me links for pre-rooted Xperia S or Xperia SL system.img and boot.img

I need these asap... pls help............!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Sony Xperia S, Acro S, Ion] yazid007:
Pc companion,SEUS not work?

Odoslané zo Žabofónu :P
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boyzvupro:
I have an international n7100

After upgraded to 4.3. I noticed a significant signal strength decreased

Now i cant receive 3g signal inside my house. When im on 4.1.2 it get full bar strength

I tried to downgrade to 4.1.2 stock and try several aosp based rom but it still the same as 4.3 stock

I tried flash different baseband. Still have the problem :(

Anyone have the same issue as mine??? Plz help me :). Tks in adv

My friends have 4.1.2 gs3 and he didnt have the same problem as mine. May be the bootloader involved here. I dont know :(

//sorry for my bad english
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] qtr4:
try a modem for your country http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2044937
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boyzvupro:
I tried all modem in that topic but signal still bad :p

The problem is i cant downgrade to the "old" 4.1.2 baseband. Only some 4.1.2 new baseband works
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Televinken:
Was on official stock Nordic 4.1.2 ROM, flashed Faria's deknoxed international 4.3 ROM & got exactly the same result as you.

Followed the roll back procedure in his description, reflashed original Nordic stock 4.1.2 again, & reception is back to normal.

No doubt it's the modem that's causing the decrease in reception. Thank God it's not irreversible.....

:good:
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boyzvupro:
Can you tell me baseband version and rom version???

Im currently on ddemj9 modem and Xxueml6 rom
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Televinken:
Here you go. It's the downgrade ROM (by Faria) that I used:

http://xdaforums.com/devdb/project/dl/?id=3117&task=get

After successful flashing of the above ROM, flash your country/area's

official 4.1.2 ROM, and you're done. You will need to wipe the device

before flashing Faria's downgrade ROM. This worked on my phone.

The Nordic ROM that I flashed after using Faria's downgrade ROM:

N7100XXDMG1_N7100OXXDMG1_N7100XXDMF1_HOME.tar

It's available through Sammobile, or similar.

Good luck, dude! :good:
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boyzvupro:
I tried flash via odin PC but it keep showing "failed"

I flashed tar.md5 via mobile odin, it worked but the rom and the baseband still have signal problem like 4.3 roms

I dont know what to do next, tried many times and failed :(
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Televinken:
Yes, you must flash the correct ROM for your country/area

after flashing Faria's one. Then you get the correct modem.

Get the appropriate ROM on your phone, & you'll be fine.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boyzvupro:
I tried but it still the same :(. Poor signal and my N2 now almost like a tablet :))