[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] vbetts:
Doing a benchmark of Epic Citadel from AOSB 1.2.9 to AOSB 1.2.9 with TDT script enabled, will post back with results.

Edit-Going to add linpack, Maybe a few more. Any requests?

Epic Citadel results

Without TDT

Performance 40.9fps

Quality 38.7 fps

High Quality 25% 40.4 fps 1.6

High Quality 50% 35.6 fps .71

High Quality 75% 29.3 fps .39

High Quality 100% 24 fps .24

With TDT

Performance 39.8 fps

Quality 30.7 fps

High Quality 25% 20 fps .8

High Quality 50% 20.5 fps .41

High Quality 75% 20.1 fps .27

High Quality 100% 19.2 fps .19

Few notes on Epic Citadel.

-FPS is lower, I assume that is because of the graphic enhancements with TDT.

-To better figure out scaling in the high quality and resolution scaling, I did a simple equation. 19.2/100=.192(rounded to .19). If you look at those numbers, you'll see that the FPS gap from the different qualities is actually smaller! This proves that the core engine of this app is running faster, but the visuals are more demanding thanks to the graphic enhancements in TDT.

-Areas that were lower FPS are high, but the higher FPS areas are lower.

Bottom line for visuals, if you want better visuals then TDT does do it. Problem is and it might just be me but I don't notice anything different in the enhancements. I can imagine with system tweaks alone, it would probably be a gain of 1.7% performance. That's pretty good odds in system performance!

Linpack results

Without TDT

Linpack single thread

MFLOPS 10.632

Time 5.68 Seconds

Linpack multi thread

MFLOPS 28.376

Time 5.94 Seconds

With TDT

Linpack single thread

MFLOPS 12.687

Time 6.61 Seconds

Linpack multi thread

MFLOPS 22.083

Time 7.64 Seconds

If you look, the results show a negative hit on performance! I'm not a huge fan of Linpack, because I've notice Linpack can show some crazy results.

Single threaded performance -0.84%

Multi threaded performance -1.28%

Looking at the base performance increase in Epic Citadel, it's too early and not enough data to say if this performance loss is real or not. I'm going to test sunspider, and again if anyone else has any suggestions for benchmarks let me know.

SunSpider results

Without TDT

Chrome Stable 1469 ms

Dolphin 1834.3 ms

Opera 1490.8 ms

Firefox 1621.1 ms

With TDT

Chrome Stable 1585.7 ms

Dolphin 1929 ms

Opera 1593.4 ms

Firefox 1582.9 ms

TDT again shows a performance hit! I'm not too happy with these results, I'm going to run them again in different web browsers and see...Dolphin, Opera, and Firefox. I don't have the stock browser since I'm running PAGAPPS so that won't be included.

Edit- We have the same situation in SunSpider now! In Chrome we show a 9% performance hit with TDT! This is also across the board with Dolphin, Opera, and Firefox! These results actually confuse me...Quadrant will be ran next.

Quadrant results

Without TDT

CPU 1209

Memory 9531

I/O 3650

2D 1006

3D 1853

Total 3450

With TDT

CPU 1219

Memory 9158

I/O 3832

2D 1014

3D 1866

Total 3418

Quadrant shows us where the improvements are. Other than the Memory and I/O performance, we see a small boost. Very small but it is there none the less.

CPU 1% increase

Memory 4% decrease

I/0 5% decrease

2D 1% increase

3D 1% increase

Overall it's a 1% decrease in performance thanks to the memory.