yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xposed Framework Modules] Jimmy34742:
The problem with toasts is that the user can miss them, so I assumed your app would make the toasts appear as notifications and linger until the user dismisses them. I guess the idea behind your app is, basically, to put the toast at the top of the phone so that the user doesn't obscure it with his own fingers while doing other stuff. But since we now have Burnt Toast and Buttered Toast, toasts have become more visible, so I actually find a brief display in the status bar easier to miss than a Burnt and Buttered toast.

In that case, yes, I would like the option to have toasts get converted to notifications so that they remain until manually dismissed. That way, you never have to worry about missing a toast if you look away from your phone. As a further refinement, the user could choose on a per app basis whether that app's toasts will be 1) left as system default-style toasts, 2) appear briefly in the status bar, or 3) get converted to a notification that the user has to manually clear.
[Xposed Framework Modules] joriswagter:
Love it, i really hate toasts because they block my view and are annoying.

Would be great if you get the icons to work!

GT-i9300, CM11, Boeffla
[Xposed Framework Modules] BrownDog99:
There is 2 apps in xposed to control toast. Untoaster stops toasts and enhanced toast which might be exactly what you are looking for blocks certain unwanted toasts.
[Xposed Framework Modules] Andronote3:
Nice module. This is exactly what I was looking for. It would be perfect if you could get the icons to work. It would also be nice for some users to have the option to turn toasts into notifications. Thanx for sharing this.
[Xposed Framework Modules] xbdarkman:
This is just perfect!! Now to get the volume spiders in the status bar
[Xposed Framework Modules] Kyshara:
I found out that the kindle app doesn't work if this is active
[Xposed Framework Modules] schloss:
It's a pity that module is discontinued. Hope someone can improve the code. It shouldn't die that way.
[Xposed Framework Modules] ryebread761:
I didn't want it to die this way either. There became a point though where the code was so bad, that doing anything with this felt like a fight. This is something I did in my free time for fun. I usually enjoy coding, and making modules, but this one became more and more of a chore. As such, I decided to end development and move on.
[Xposed Framework Modules] hystericalz:
let me check out the mod
[Xposed Framework Modules] samep:
This is just what I'm looking for.

Working well so far.

Maybe it will work for the apps I'm using.

Thanks!
[Xposed Framework Modules] samep:
update: I don't see any issues using this but one of the other toast mods did not work properly. But that's OK, this is by far my preferred toast method! I've also looked for and found alternative apps that cause the sticky or persistent toasts. Seems to be an indication that the apps are the problem. Nonetheless, having toasts block the screen while working was a bad idea and I don't have to put up with that anymore. Glad the developer retains this module for download in Xposed. And I hit the thanks button in OP.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] samsonite727:
Hello

I bought the Note 10.1 2014 upon release in Canada and it has worked fine until recently. The tablet does not properly recognize my earphones, when I insert the earphones it will tell me "headphones connected" and the symbol would appear top left and than quickly disappear. I either have to fiddle with the earphone by turning it or push it right in for it to work but it will stop working there after.

I have reset the tablet and I have tried 4 perfectly good headphones and the result is the same. I called Samsung and they told me to get Samsung earphones.

Anyone else experiencing this? Would Samsung earphones fix this or is the headphone jack broken?

Thank you
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] Geordie Affy:
Why would samsung earphones make a difference?? Seems like a fault has occured witht the headset jack.

Sent from Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition via Tapatalk.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] samsonite727:
Hello, bring this thread back from the dead

I didnt indicate this in my original post but I got the headphone jack problem a couple of days after I updated firmware via odin, got it fixed by sending to samsung.

I updated to kitkat via Odin a couple of days ago and now my headphone jack messed up again, keeps on reconnecting upon slightly moving the headphones. :(

Is this a coincidence?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] graewulf1:
Are you sure it's not the headphones? Have you tried a different brand?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] WJThomas:
Look in the headphone jack for lint or other debris.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] samsonite727:
Thx for the suggestions, tried different headphones and same thing, I will clean it with an air duster when I get a chance to buy it.

Thx
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] samsonite727:
Nothing wokred :(

2nd time in three months this has happened, getting really annoying.

On a side note, anyone know if I can revert the firmware back to the Canadian version 4.3 (currently have kitkat 4.4)? If so, where can I find the firmware.

thx
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] jpl69:
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] indyannad:
Hi

Hi I've been experiencing the same issue, just wondering if you've found a way to fix this?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] trader4300:
Apparently there is an issue with the samsung earphone jack but have not heard of a response from Samsung on this. My jack does not accept any devices, so it is all FG^&^ed up too. What to do about this?
[Moto X Q&A] rweddy1:
So before the latest news about google selling moto,....... don't get me started here I ordered a dev edition for $379.

Anyway thoughts on if it is worth the $125 dollar difference in cost ( price of new dev edition - selling price my old x)

Worth the cost? I am rooted now on my X but thinking the dev ed was (before the sale of moto) more future proof?

Maybe now the unlocked boot loader is more important because of the sale?

Thoughts???
[Moto X Q&A] balleron24z:
In short, the developer edition is unrestricted in the fact once you've unlocked the bootloader, you can flash any rom that's available. It's technically "future proof" in the sense that as long as developers are making roms, it will continue to get the latest AOSP updates, or in the case of the Eclipse rom, it is AOSP while retaining stock features. I don't think you made a mistake in getting the developer edition, I made a mistake getting the moto maker X and I'm kicking myself because now that Google sold Moto to Lenovo, it's possible we won't see the updates that Moto was pushing so fast. I think as long as the software team at Moto stay in place, though, and Lenovo doesn't touch what the X and the G are all about, we ultimately will see the same basic process in terms of updates and the way the X and G are almost AOSP. Dev edition really isn't more expensive, the 32GB MM is the same price as a Dev edition, which has the same 32GB of space. Only difference is you're getting an open device instead of one that is closed to modification.
[Moto X Q&A] Schaweet:
Not trying to start a flame war, but by the time Lenovo takes over, your X will be on your shelf and you'll be rocking a new phone anyway. All this panic is getting old. This deal has to go through all sorts of approvals will probably take a year or more before it takes shape. Plus, it's not like Lenovo bought Moto to totally dismantle it. They didn't become the dominant force in the PC world by making stupid decisions. Moto has huge brand name recognition in the US and they are currently making great strides with the X and G.

I actually think this will be a huge success for Moto. Also remember Moto has pushed a bunch of apps to the play store making updates Super easy.

Sent from my Dev Edition Moto X
[Moto X Q&A] Henrock11:
Isn't there also a difference in the frequency bands between the Dev edition and regular unlocked model? I'm interested in the Dev edition but if I'm not mistaking its missing the 1700 band for 3g. Correct me if I'm wrong.
[Moto X Q&A] rweddy1:
Great points. I loved Eclipse ROM on my G. Nexus, have to look into that once I get the Dev Edition.
[Moto X Q&A] balleron24z:
It'd be good to look at the specs on the model you plan on getting, because there's a Dev edition for CDMA and for GSM, and different model numbers for them. But I believe you're right as well.

I can partially agree, Schaweet. I think that as long as the reigns are with Moto, then everything will stay great as is. Maybe even better, since Lenovo does have great products presently. Love their laptops/desktops. I'm just afraid that everything the Moto X and G are could be intruded upon by the software team at Lenovo, meaning the nice AOSP-type OS that Moto use might get a lot of unwanted modifications. I think that's the bigger concern, not how Moto will be as a company, but how their products will be influenced.
[Moto X Q&A] rweddy1:
I am not sure, I referring to the Verizon Edition, GSM might be different.
[Moto X Q&A] Schaweet:
Here you go.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moto_X

That shows the frequencies per model.

Sent from my Dev Edition Moto X

---------- Post added at 08:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 AM ----------

Fair enough. It's a total guess about what they will do with the UI. I can say with a high degree of confidence that they won't update the X and add their UI. Going forward though, you never know. I'd hope they'd just push and market Motos existing strategy, but that's my consumer side hope. I would think the near AOSP UI that Moto has could be enough to provide the product difference they want to separate them from everyone else without some silly skin like TV.

Sent from my Dev Edition Moto X
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grahamgo:
I prefer to use the APEX launcher over the standard one provided. However, I have run into a problem, the APEX launcher loads fine and works fine.

In the Settings-Home there is the option to choose the preferred "Home" launcher. The problem I have found is that yes you can choose the preferred launcher and a blue selected dot appears next to the desired launcher. But as soon as I exit the menu a new popup appears and asks me to select the desired launcher again.

So basically the system will not remember my preference. I have a Galaxy Nexus also running 4.4.2 and this works fine, so I know what should be happening.

I have been in contact with Motorola support and they tell me that I should contact the 3rd party launcher people. But I have tried three launchers now and they all give the same result.

I am pretty sure that this is a Motorola G software bug.

What I am asking here is for someone else to try installing a 3rd party launcher and to see if it "sticks" and is remembered correctly in the Settings-Home section.

I have also re-installing the Moto G US international firmware, ie. factory fresh. But the result is the same. I might try installing the UK version. But would appreciate some ideas via this forum first.
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mdentener:
I use Apex paid version and haven't seen any strange behavior. Apex is my default launcher and behaves the same as on my nexus 7.
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grahamgo:
I too use the Apex paid version on an N7 and GNexus, both running 4.4.2 without problems. With the Moto G though if I choose APEX in the Settings-Home area and I click on it and the selector turns blue. BUT, if I leave and return into Settings-Home everything is greyed out ie. nothing is selected. So my preference is not "remembered"

Can you do me a favor. I just want to know if on your Moto G the Settings-Home settings are preserved.

Thanks
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] neu - smurph:
Works OK for me (unrooted - 4.4.2 174.44.9.falcon_umts.TescoSl.en.GB). I use Apex Pro as-well and can switch between both Launchers with no additional dialogs. I do need to press the home button for the new launcher setting to take though, but if I don't and go back to the settings screen nothing is greyed out.
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KpaTyH:
I use Nove Prime as default launcher and have no problems
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grahamgo:
Guy's thanks for the info. It looks like I have a problem which was perhaps self inflicted. I decided to unlock/root/Su etc. and had some real problems with CWM and finally used TWRP. Tried a few ROM's but found that none supported the Motorola magnetic flip cover. So decided to go back to stock (Blur_Version.172.44.4.falcon_umts.Retail.en.US). This seemed to go well and the only issue I have now is this 3rd party launcher problem.

I have just realized that I used fastboot and not mfastboot, maybe that's the problem. Maybe I can try the UK version or perhaps the Google Play version.

Anyway thanks for the responses. I think this thread is drawing to an end, if I get success I will post it here to wrap things up.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 Windows Mobile 2005 Upgrading] tlazymoon:
Hi.. just like to ask whether i should upgrade my rom version ??

my current rom version:

ROM version: 1.11.00 WWE

ROM date: 01/27/05

Radio version: 1.00.00

Protocol version: 1337.39

ExtROM version: 1.11.923 WWE

should i upgade to another rom?? N whats the different after upgrade?

Another Q, my camera looks grainy compared to DOPOD 818.. how to make IT more clearer o what software will improve the camera quality??

THx. Cheersss
[Moto X General] :
K....this may get closed and/or flamed beyond recognition ....LOL....but here it is.

Not talking about myself here, cause I'm not near as active in the Moto x forum as I was in the t989 S2 forum. Mostly because I'm still learning all the ins and outs of this phone.....

I'm posting this on behalf of the Moto x unsung heros .....we all know who a few of them are, and there's some that go way above and beyond helping others....and many more that help some people tremendously......and I'm noticing a lot of "awesome, you're a life saver....thanks so much" comments, yet a giant lack of thanks given. I mean the thanks button. Not the typed words.

I know many will barge in here and say its not about racking up thanks totals you arrogant ass...LOL.........and it definitely isn't. BUT....hitting that button is a great way to let others see that this very helpful person has helped so many out...as indicated by his thanks number. It makes some feel good too....seeing that number rise. Petty? Some may say....but get a bunch for yourself....It does make you all warm and fuzzy seeing that people appreciate your help. :)

Anyway.....the reason I started this thread..... was simply a better alternative to singling people out in the threads and starting trouble, or making someone feel bad who's new and didn't know it even existed. Lol

The S2 community was more tightly nit I think and people weren't stingy with the thanks button....especially when someone went out of their way to help. But here in the X forum, there is handful of extremely helpful guys not getting thanked over and over....it astonishes me sometimes (won't name names....but a lot of us can think of a few I'm sure) and I just finished reading a thread where one of these good Samaritans posted back and forth helping a guy...not one sentence posts....huge long ones with very detailed help....and the guy did say thanks....but never thanked any of the good Samaritans posts. Not one.

Anyway....flame me to pieces if you'd like ....but come on guys....lets show people our appreciation in a way that follows that helpful guy anywhere he goes on xda. That's exactly why the button exists.

And no.....I don't expect thanks on this post. LOL. As I said....I'm no guru on the X.....yet.....I'll earn my thanks as I deserve them....or not. ;)

Sent from my Moto X cellular telephone...
[Moto X General] flashallthetime:
1^

Sent on my Gummy running Lenoto X
[Moto X General] eksasol:
But at the sametime people who beg for thanks annoy the heck out of me.
[Moto X General] :
And I totally agree. ;)

Sent from my Moto X cellular telephone...
[Moto X General] A2Trip:
Its not really a beg, more as a demand that steers users away from using it. If you genuinely give advice all the time you'll get the thanks you deserve! :thumbup:
[Moto X General] Restola:
If I annoyed the heck out of you please let me know by hitting the "thanks" button! Lol
[Moto X General] :
;)

Sent from my Moto X cellular telephone...
[Moto X General] gtg465x:
Wait... There's a thanks button? What the... This changes everything.
[Moto X General] flashallthetime:
There's also a report button:D:D:D

Sent on my Gummy running Lenoto X
[Moto X General] :
I've never seen anyone demand... LOL

And you're right. But come on...you see a guy write tonnes of help to just one guy...and nada...not one thanks. Its either cause they don't know...or don't care. Or is there another catagory...."you helped me sure...but not good enough for me to expel the effort to click that button...so keep practicing!" ;)

I'm not talking hit thanks for everything and anything replied to you....but when a guy types 1000 words in your thread...come on. Lol

Sent from my Moto X cellular telephone...
[Moto X General] :
If I get enough flack here...i can gladly post links to examples.... LOL. Tho its not fair really....but I can.

No...not talking about myself helping....I'm small time here. ;)

Sent from my Moto X cellular telephone...
[Moto X General] chaoslimits:
Couldn't agree more. Even some of the smallest mods that we take for granted (let alone Roms and Feature addition) take lots of hours and effort. A single click of the "Thanks" button isn't something one should have to ask for.

*looks at his own signature* :crying:
[Moto X General] Pr1meSuspect:
Only thing that annoys me more than that are the people who feel the need to list all their previous devices in their signature.

Sent from my Moto X DE
[Moto X General] flashallthetime:
I think overall most folks do appreciate the help but for some they just assume its their God given right, every thread has its riff raff

Sent on my Gummy running Lenoto X
[Moto X General] gtg465x:
Why? I started doing it back when I was doing a lot of development for various devices. I would sell one, stop developing for it, and then get constant PMs asking if I still had this device or that device and which device I was switching too. I don't need to do it anymore, but it's kind of addictive.
[Moto X General] eksasol:
I like listing my devices, but if I started doing it again I'll probably use the

function.
[Moto X General] alpha-niner64:
I wish people would use the Thanks button more too. It costs nothing to do it and it's quicker than a post. You'll help let people know which posts are useful, contribute to the decluttering of threads and you get a warm feeling of boosting someone's e-rep. The only downside is that you're limited to X amount per day(IIRC). I should make that into a sig...maybe.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
I've been looking on multiple other threads for the last few days now but haven't found a fix. I updated my S3 from 4.1.2 to 4.3 through the phone(AT&T recommended update) and it worked for 4 days but was very glitchy. Then it shut off one day with 50% battery and wouldn't turn back on. I tried pulling the battery and turning it on but it would generally fail after it reached the galaxy s3 logo. Can't stay in download mode or recovery mode without it crashing. I sometimes I found that if I leave the battery out for an over 4-5 hours, it can get it to boot and reach my home screen but it soon crashes. Any help would be greatly appreciated since I have been without a phone for about a week. Thank you.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
Can you do a factory reset in recovery mode? Not sure if you phone will stay on long enough.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
Unfortunately no, the phone doesn't stay on long enough. And I've tried with and without the phone plugged into a charger or my computer but neither really help.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
Any warranty left on your phone? If not, you could try flashing a custom recovery in Odin if the phone will stay in download mode, then wipe data, cache from the custom recovery.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
No I'm pretty sure the warranty is ended since I've had the phone for about a year and 3 months and don't have any insurance through AT&T. How would I go about flashing a custom recovery? Is there a link to a tutorial you could refer me to? Just in case I could get the phone to stay in download mode long enough. Thanks for all your help by the way. I really appreciate it.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
Okay. Download the tar version of Philz Touch Recovery from here: http://goo.im/devs/philz_touch/CWM_Advanced_Edition/d2att

Install it using Odin by selecting pda and browsing to where you saved the CWM file. Flash it, go into recovery, and wipe.

Good luck. Let me know how it goes.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
The flash worked and now my phone is staying in recovery. It got into recovery mode and did a factory reset. Now I started up and I started setting up my phone (wifi, google account..) but it crashed multiple times during that setup time. I haven't reached the home screen yet. Occasionally it will boot loop once or twice before reaching the setup again......

So I finally got to the home screen and it crashed (after about 7-8 crashes and reboots). Could it be 4.3 or maybe a hardware problem?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
Could be either but let's assume it is an OS issue. Did you flash a custom rom?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
No I didn't, I don't know of one that I should flash? Recommendations?

Also, my phone was just on for about 8 minutes and was working. I noticed that my power/lock button was extremely touchy and i would barely have to touch(not press it) to lock it. If I press it (like I use to to lock it, it pulls up the power off/options and if I don't do anything about it, it will shut off and restart(boot loop) until i pull the battery and turn it on myself. So I think it might be a problem with the power button being too touchy that it just turns off. Do you know if there is a way to disable the power button?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
I run Cyanfox on my brother's S3 and it's pretty stable: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2480007

Yes, the power button could be causing the problem. Sounds like the power connection and/or board may be defective.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
Alright I will try to see if I can get that to work. Now the phone is rarely making it to the home screen and if it does, it only stays for at most a minute. Generally it's back to it only getting to the initial Samsung logo.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
Is this with the stock ROM?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
Yeah it is. All stock.The only change that I made recently was the firmware update to 4.3.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
Okay, definitely try Cyanfox to see what happens.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jadams760:
Okay, I'm reading instructions and it says the one of the prerequisites is to have the phone rooted. Is that really the case?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] audit13:
No need to be rooted. You can just flash it in recovery.