yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III General] andip71:
Correct. I still don't recommend it.

But he asked a different question about two settings and whether they conflict ☺
[Galaxy S III General] boyheadkick:
Ooops, my bad..i misunderstood the statement

-aL

tapatalked from my super duper palm top computer
[Galaxy S III General] boyheadkick:
Correct, she barely used it...correct also that the device was in deep sleep the whole time..and that is what exactly i was trying to show, superb idle time..

and yes it's weird if you noticed the uptrend in the middle, but it does not show the device as charging..there is a bit of charging though but it's too little to matter

-aL

tapatalked from my super duper palm top computer
[Galaxy S III General] GUZGUN:
I used your v5 profile for 2 days and I think is a bit laggy. V4 was much better for me.

sent from my samsung galaxy s3 tapatalk pro
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Cheers for the feedback, this profile is different to v4 and I think it will suit some users better than others.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] aliw32619:
So how do I get rid of this?
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
I use greenify but paid version as it enables hibernation of system apps so you can kill that wake lock your looking at! Secondly the donate version gives you a lock and hibernate button which is wonderful!

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] aliw32619:
Yeah I'm already using greenify paid version but can't find that wakelock
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Sadly it is GooglePlayServices, I would have play store and google search as hibernating when your screen goes off and see if it lowers the gms wakelock count, it did for me, I was having exactly the same issue, which sounds like google have made mistakes in their latest release.

Then make sure you use greenify and tap menu and select create hibernation & lock shortcut and use that method to lock your phone, safe in the knowledge that those battery eating apps have been put down! :)
[Galaxy S III General] Thecrazyskull:
install xposed and install nlpunbounce that worked for me.

EDIT: if you can't find nlpunbounce in xposed search for unbounce then you should find it.
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
I'll take a look at that as well in case it's better! Cheers

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] C.3.S.4.R:
i have 2 normal issue and 1 big issue:

the first one is wifi direct works, connect to other devices etc, but i cant send files, es filer explorer, my files nor root explorer show the option to wifi direct...

the second one is i have set my AC/USB charge to 1600 mA, i have a charger that give 2100 mA but when i plug in to the phone galaxy charging current say only 1000 mA is the current charge rate i need help with that (i try a lot of cables that is not the problem)

and the big big big problem is, today in the morning my phone has a complete colour descalibration, all colores are overbright and the medium black/gray colours are purple :/ y reboot into recovery to try some reset but, in recovery too...

i need help please

ROM: S5 Sensation 7.0

Kernel: Boeffla 6.1 beta 5
[Galaxy S III General] aliw32619:
Well I'm greenifying lots of system apps that doesn't have a negative effect including playstore and I already removed google search and some system apps I don't need with titanium backup :)
[Galaxy S III General] boyheadkick:
wifi direct works, connect to other devices etc, but i cant send files, es filer explorer, my files nor root explorer show the option to wifi direct

sorry, can't help with this since i dont use wifi direct :(

i have set my AC/USB charge to 1600 mA, i have a charger that give 2100 mA but when i plug in to the phone galaxy charging current say only 1000 mA is the current charge rate

have you set the ignore functions on as well?if no, then try doing so and observe

today in the morning my phone has a complete colour descalibration, all colores are overbright and the medium black/gray colours are purple :/ y reboot into recovery to try some reset but, in recovery too

as far as i know samsung custom recoveries have their own kernel, so if this is the case the color decalibration in recovery is not anymore handled by boeffla kernel..
[Galaxy S III General] MBurns2:
i installed it two days ago, i don't know why but it says : "wakelock detected 15000 (for example) and wakelock blocked 0."

In other words, on my phone, it doesn't work.. i hope to find a solution ;)
[Galaxy S III General] dead4ngel:
hi. i am using sokp rom found here http://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s3/development/i9300-kk-4-4-201-05milestone-1-t2705023

what is the best profile to use to give me good battery. i have tried the cm ones and they are not so good. i bought a brand new battery last week (official samsung one). for last 2 days i have been using mgh sammy ondemand v5 . it is good but is there one thats more battery friendly? i normaly use my phone thoroughtout most of the day on 3g. apps used - whats app, facebook, instagram, snapchat. let me know thanks.
[Galaxy S III General] Thecrazyskull:
O im sorry man i don't know.
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Try Archie battery profile. But your probably is all of those social apps, they use lots of network to keep themselves updated, ie push notifications etc and if you are always having your screen on and off checking them then your the market for an extended size battery.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] Grimzee:
Thankyou [MENTION=5860619]dr.Arsla[/MENTION] my battery has been alot better since using your profile
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
zzmoove profile

Hi chaps, thought I would have a play with zzmoove!

Thing is for me, governors with hotplugging leads to audio stutter when streaming via bluetooth, but I have to admit that other governors offer less UI lag compared to ondemand, which to it's credit at least is bug free and perfect all round at the expense of a little response lag.

So this profile is similar to my v4/5 ondemand governors in all other ways, but with zzmoove performance tuning profile used, however it has hotplugging disabled to prevent audio stutter, which works perfectly. But of course people will argue that it won't be as battery efficient without the hotplugging.

I am not convinced, because hotplugging when monitored tends to be so aggressive when the device is in use and I tend to notice that cores are switched on and off so many times that this can have its own overhead. Therefore, I am now testing to see how battery fairs with this profile I have created.

I am sure it won't be for everyone, but if you are a A2DP user then it might be of interest to you, I'd be pleased if anyone tests along with me and reports back with regards to battery performance in particular :)
[Galaxy S III General] GUZGUN:
Trying from yesterday your new profile. I think it's not so battery friendly.After the last charge today in idle mode for 7 hours it went from 100 to 86%.

sent from my samsung galaxy s3 tapatalk pro
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Thanks.

My test today I have used 33% of my battery in 12 hours so far. I have an hour screen time and 2.5 hours Bluetooth streaming of music. During screen off I have had no drain greater than 1% list in a two hour period, with WiFi off.

I'll try and leave my phone alone for a bit and see what idle condition is like I've a longer period of time.

I don't mind trading a bit of battery overall for the excellent speed increase I have gained, but I will test this for another 48 hours before tweaking further.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
[MENTION=4794809]GUZGUN[/MENTION] hi mate, I lost 3% battery over 8.5 hours last night. See screen shots, something else must have caused your drain yesterday., do you use better battery stats?
[Galaxy S III General] NickName98:
Hey [MENTION=2069027]metalgearhathaway[/MENTION]

Is your signature valid?

I've also sent you a pm but no answer :(

Sorry for the off topic
[Galaxy S III General] GUZGUN:
No I don't have bbs. I`'ll give it a new try and will be back.

sent from my samsung galaxy s3 tapatalk pro
[Galaxy S III General] boyheadkick:
i added this profile to the jb4.3 list since i assume the neatrom you're running is 4.3 based..
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Indeed, cheers mate! I'll never go away from stock base on this phone, it is not worth the trade off with camera issues for me :)
[Galaxy S III General] ~DemonLord~:
[MENTION=2069027]metalgearhathaway[/MENTION] what is the core switch off and deep sleep policy since hotplugging is disabled? I think you should tame the hotplugging to make it so it does switch off cores but only after you are not doing anything involving opening or changing apps such as reading, Will save alot of battery that way and will not shut down cores when doing more intensive work.
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Spot on, that is exactly what I am doing. Firstly, I needed to know as a benchmark what the device would deliver with hotplugging disabled, this will allow me to measure the difference between disabled and then through different levels of core management. I think I have a tough task, as I can tell you that the many many variants of the zzmoove governor profiles available, all of which use hotplugging, all of them have stutter issues with A2DP. It could well be that it's not curable, or if it is then the battery gain after taming it may be quite minimal.

This is why I labelled this one as WIP, it really is, if you have the time and are looking for the same goal as regards to A2DP Stutter, then please feel free to experiment along with me! :)
[Galaxy S III General] GUZGUN:
Second try. No battery drain. 13 hours in almost Idle mode and the battery went from 94 to 89. The problem is at the moment that when I have 2~3 process simultaneously only 1 core is on and I have a big lag.

sent from my samsung galaxy s3 tapatalk pro
[Galaxy S III General] stoianmitkov:
How can I choice how many cores to work?
[Galaxy S III General] ~DemonLord~:
[MENTION=2069027]metalgearhathaway[/MENTION]

Hmm perhaps limit your work to only 3 profiles. battery yank since it is definetly the most popular profile used everywhere. Optimized since it can save battery or preform having no preference. And then either performance or InZane, maybe zanezam could better tell the difference between the two. I think InZane is more 'tamed' preformance seems a bit wild from my experience.
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
MGH zzmoove V2 WIP

More gentle progress.

I completed my v1 tests using a base of performance zzmoove and I have now progressed to zzmoove on the infamous battery yank profile.

I discover new things and realise I probably have much more to learn and test!

So, as I have already pointed out back in the defense of my preference of ondemand, the hotplug nature of governors that use it is that streaming music via Bluetooth A2DP can be pretty stuttery, render enjoyment impossible. Ondemand circumnavigates the issue simply by keep all cores active.

When I was initially looking at the issue back in the days of my dual core S2, I monitored the core activity and have since done the same with the S3, sadly as the cores get switched on and off, stutter starts to rear its ugly head.

I wondered if I could somehow tame the hotplugging nature, but it escapes me at the moment, it's unweildly to be honest, but I will be perservering a solution that allows hotplugging to stay in full time action.

In the interim, I have my V2 profile attached, now on zzmoove battery yank, however via tunables I have disabled sleep hotplugging, but I have kept awake hotplugging active. In doing so, I am able to still eliminate the stutter, which proves that it is the hotplug scenarios during the device falling asleep that are the root cause.

I am going to monitor the devices battery performance and then once I have a result that shows it to be better or worse than my V1 performance profile that had all hotplugging disabled.

Once I know the results to that, I will compare the results to those I have from running the device with hotplugging enabled across the board.

This will let me know whether there is anything to gain from working on new settings to make sleep hotplugging work without stutter, of course if the results between tests show me that there is no battery saving to be gained from sleep hotplug then I will not waste my time and declare a mini victory.

I have my thoughts on sleep hotplugging and they are out of pure ignorance with a bit of an educated guess, this is that when the device is sleeping, the cpu is in a super low power mode, bearing this in mind individual savings made by disabling some cores should be totally negligible, I'll soon know the answers, it will take me 3-4 days to test out all my variables. If you care look at for my next post.

FYI, attached is the profile, but also screenshots of my battery for the day. Very little screen time, but I did a heck of a lot of driving with music on 100% of the time. 52% battery used for 55 minutes screen time but a whopping 6+ hours of Bluetooth audio streaming in the car. Whenever I got to a destination and the phone got to rest it never once lost a single percentage of battery. Tomorrow it gets a sleepy day as I am in the office, so this will give me two good results to work from, today went well!
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Second day of tests, lots of sleep no battery drain, only used 18% battery so far!

I'm now pretty sure that sleep hot plug is pointless, I have no additional battery savings for having it enabled and there is no performance issues either.

Therefore I can't see a good reason to look into making sleep hot plug work, audio issues resolved and no battery negatives, unless anyone can think of a good reason?, I sure can't! :)

Final tests over the weekend and then I think I might just be happy with v2 as a final profile! :)
[Galaxy S III General] aliw32619:
What is better in terms of battery life using Blekota S5 v7 4.4.2 debloated and removed unused system apps with titanium backup or using NeatRom v8 4.3 sammy debloated ?
[Galaxy S III General] senthilaca:
With boefella kernel can we minimise the usage of Ram? If so what changes should be made in boefella config app?
[Galaxy S III General] ZaneZam:
Reducing usage of ram on Android makes no sense it has per design a almost full used ram so only increasing it "helps" ;)
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
After playing with zzmoove and enjoying it, I reckon that battery life does not increase as expected compared to ondemand, indeed I'm pretty sure the later is better even without the hot plug. More playing around ahead!

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] costantini1993:
i use boeffla kernel stock with touchboost 500 mhz, undervolve cpu 50, gpu stock 160/266 undervolve 25, no zram and is perfecly
[Galaxy S III General] gabyif:
Any hope for a new zzmove profile soon? :)
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
You will be pleased to hear that I am working on two final profiles, one for zzmoove and one for ondemand.

Personally I have decided that ondemand still provides best performance and battery longevity :)

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] gabyif:
whoaa,can't wait to test it :fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
As a matter of interest which zzmoove base profile do those who want it like it based on? Battery yank, extreme, performance? Let me know and I'll make the profile based on demand

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] katolink:
I would say battery yank for better battery longevity. Thanks in advance [emoji6]
[Galaxy S III General] gabyif:
Yeah, battery yank would be better for a balance between performance and battery life:)
[Galaxy S III General] aliw32619:
Battery yank :)
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
I detect consensus of opinion, battery yank it is :)

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Ondemand Final!

Hi guys, here is my Final Ondemand profile. From my point of view it is the best allrounder governor, good battery and system performance and no A2DP bluetooth stutter guaranteed!

This final release is slightly tweaked over my V4 version, with zRam increased slightly from 200mb to 240mb on a single device. I have tested both as single and quad device, I can tell you that the device performs better in my eyes with one device. Whether that is to do with it being on a Sammy base and the fact that their build is designed to work with 1 device I am not sure. Maybe for CM builds quad device zram works better! Only 40mb added to zRam, I know that Sammy uses 300mb, but every MB that is used as zram essentially reduces the available fast ram, so I have been keen to get to a figure where everything works perfectly without over committing ram for compression.

CPU governor up threshold reduced to allow for improved performance, without battery side affects!

All other features remain the same as previous releases :)

Enjoy, I hope you find it is the right balance for you too!

NB: CM/AOSP Users, if you want to use this profile then do so, just reset the LMK values in Boeffla config!
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Final zzmmoove governor

Now for the final zzmoove governor. I have mixed feelings for zzmoove, in many ways it's performance is really good and it is ok on battery as well. But I do find more UI lag with zzmoove and in general lag on small tasks, big tasks it's really good however. I assume the design of zzmoove is to ramp up performance only when truly needed. However, the hotplug nature really does take its toll on battery performance, when really the idea behind it is to save power. What happens instead is cores get switched off but when demand arrives they switch on and spike and thus end up using more power. In some circumstance of low usage, I think power could be saved, but if you are a 2-5 hour of screen time sort of user then I think it negatively impacts.

There are two versions attached, they mirror my Ondemand Final for configuration, but have zzmoove battery yank governor as base profile, one version is for those who do not have audio stutters on bluetooth or other audio usage and one with A2DP in the title for those who want the tweaked version to alleviate stutter, which is achieved by turning off hot plugging on the sleep cycle, wake hot plugging remains active.

I would highly advise running a couple of days on this profile, but then try my ondemand profile and see how it compares :)

NB: CM/AOSP Users, if you want to use this profile then do so, just reset the LMK values in Boeffla config!
[Galaxy S III General] katolink:
Thanks very much for these profiles [MENTION=2069027]metalgearhathaway[/MENTION] ! Already trying ondemand v4 and looks very very good ! [emoji6] [emoji4] Will test it for a while and then switch to zzmoove profiles and compare. Will report back!

One question: toggling in boeffla config settings like boeffla sound or charging parameters (for example usb charging rate) would presumably not affect the other settings... right? [emoji4] In other words is there any specific reason for which you disabled boeffla sound or decreased charging rates, for example?

Thanks again!
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
I decrease the charging rates because Samsung's stock bundled charger is actually only rated at 700mV, so asking the phone to charge faster is putting additional strain on the power supply. I charge overnight, so the speed of which it charges does not really matter to me. If you have a higher rated charger or are happy to stress the stock charger then feel free to increase it, I just stick to the safe limits so not to hurt or anyone else's phone.

As for Boeffla sound, I find stock sound with my choice of graphic equalizer app (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.smartandroidapps.equalizer&hl=en_GB) perfect for my audio needs, so I find I have nothing to gain from Boeffla Sound configuration, this I think is a fairly personal choice.

Feel free to ask more questions if you have any :)
[Galaxy S III General] katolink:
Noted, thanks for the clarification. As you kindly offered to answer any other questions, I shall gladly follow your encouragement and ask you one more [emoji4] [emoji51]

I have noticed that you have also switched off touch to wake. Is it because it affects the sleep hotplugging? I personally use this as I find it very useful when reading articles or even e-books, but I always go for maximum 5 seconds of delay, not more, battery saving-wise. Any thoughts on this are highly appreciated. [emoji4] [emoji106] Thanks in advance!
[Galaxy S III General] bone069:
Is it possible to use this Profile with Android 4.4.2?
[Galaxy S III General] katolink:
Yes. I am using it with S5 Sensation ROM v.7.
[Galaxy S III General] bone069:
What about LMK? Reset to default?
[Galaxy S III General] boyheadkick:
if the LMK values in the profile are causing problems, then yes you're better off resetting the LMK values..as far as i know when you load a foreign profile you are asked if you want to load those values
[Galaxy S III General] katolink:
I'm running on LMK values set by MGH profile with no problems so far. Everything is as smooth as butter [emoji4]
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
I've never had a need for touch to wake, but I can see how it is useful for you, I think I heard that having the touchscreen active for sleep input costs about 4% battery a day, seems worth it if you get the use out of it :)

I just use double tap home button to wake myself.
[Galaxy S III General] Blackstard:
can use on cm 11?
[Galaxy S III General] metalgearhathaway:
Yeah just reset lmk :)

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] katolink:
My latest impressions after running both MGH zzmoove and ondemand final versions: zzmoove is a great battery saver (noticeably better than ondemand), but indeed it still feels a little slow as far as responsiveness is considered (generally at UI level). Ondemand is there, everywhere, anytime, omnipresent, no matter what apps you use or how quick you choose to open/close them or whether the phone is in sleep mode or not (for example, when receiving calls the display lights up as soon as you hear the ringing tone, whereas zzmoove forces a relatively short delay between the moment when the phone starts ringing and the moment when the display lights up). With ondemand it's like: you want something, you got it, right away and with no hesitation! :o Of course, this comes at a price, which is a little less battery saving, but it sure is worth it! :D

Strange enough, I have also noticed that zzmoove tends to heat the battery more than ondemand when using CPU/GPU intensive apps. For instance I played Clash of Clans with each governor and the battery temp quickly spiked to 62 C on zzmoove, which never happened when using ondemand. This is quite odd as zzmoove battery yank is not intended to be a performance governor and I do not understand it :confused: but, perhaps, this is related to the persistent hotplugging "spikes" characteristic to zzmoove governor which end up using more battery than ondemand, at the same level of CPU/GPU stress. Maybe [MENTION=2069027]metalgearhathaway[/MENTION] or other devs may shed more light on this strange behavior or add any other thoughts worthy of being mentioned here :o

Otherwise, both governors look damn smooth and do their job incredibly well, even on KK-based ported ROMs (heavily debloated). Still going to test them (as, objectively, I need more time to observe their behaviour and let each of them settle in the system) and revert with additional thoughts/impressions as the case may be! ;)

All the best everyone!
[Galaxy S III General] ZaneZam:
Yes these are all known "issues" with zzmoove but If someone would try the available "game" profile then the overheating should be gone or at least lesser. Beside of that I included proportional scaling which is enabled in game profile and this is actually how the ondemand scaling logic works in addition in case of zzmoove 1.0 u even can have both zzmoove features and ondemand scaling (well almost the same scaling behaving) by giving scaling proportional tuneable the value 2. Just want to let u know if someone wants to play around ;)