yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EtherealRemnant:
Yep. No change. Its weird. Its obviously doing something because the capacitive buttons flicker off and then come back on but the brightness is the same. The only one that works is turning them off entirely.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] v1rk:
Hmm you don't it could also be kernel related as theres the notification mod to flash the capacitive when theres a notification
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EtherealRemnant:
I don't know. I haven't messed with kernels in a while. Mostly because I don't use my phone as much now that I have a Nexus 7 and it doesn't overheat unlike my One. I just happened to grab my phone when I saw your post and noticed my buttons are pink on Viper.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] v1rk:
Cool man, yeah at times i prefer using the nexus 7 at times just because bigger screen but mainly on the phone more as need for daily use but did find nexus 7 2013 design to be a bit annoying when its hot compared to the 2012 model. Although got both 2013 seems to be same as htc one just alot bigger.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GianniDPC:
Hello, I'm trying to play GTA:SA but the app is closing, I'm running CyanogenMod 11 (11-20140120 Nightly) with 3.4.75-franco.Kernel, See picture below, Can anyone help me out?, Why is the app closing :rolleyes:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GianniDPC:
Bump some help please :(
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
Hard to say. Works on Stock. Maybe providing a logcat to the CM developers will help
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mistahseller:
Have you tried other ROMs that aren't CM?

As rootSU said it is hard to know you gave us zero information other than CM 11, Franco kernel, and a screenshot. I blame CM
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GianniDPC:
Yep, Blame CM tried it on my Nexus 7 (Broke my screen on that device), but managed to install it using a mouse, same thing happened, Where can I report this? and how? Thanks in advance

EDIT: It works on CyanogenMod 10.2 (Tested on my old phone) so it's a CyanogenMod 11 issue.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] kr0th:
Solved.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LeoRex:
sorry... wrong forum!
[General Questions and Answers] LifeAsADroid:
Hi all,

I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to modify the color scheme of the Android OS, to change all of the blue coloring to another color. Things like the 4G symbol, battery, and clock in the top status bar, and all the blue normally seen throughout the functions of the ROM.

In case it matters, I'm on 4.1.2, rooted, unlocked bootloader...

Thanks in advance!
[General Questions and Answers] GermainZ:
You can use a theme if your ROM supports it. Have a look at the Android Themes forum.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] nighelfs:
Hi all, I have read through the forum and I saw that everyone said that it is impossible to put Windows Mobile 5 into Magician.

Here are some proofs:

Ok, here is my problem. I received this as a gift... as you can see, the OS is in Chinese. I tried to install an English flash in it using instructions provided from http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=HTC_Magician .. but it doesn't work.. MaUpgradeUt_noID.exe keeps complainting that it cannot flash the phone.

I don't care if it's using WM3 or WM4 or WM5... as long as I can use it... can anyone help? thanks.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] Andy4life:
how on earth did u do that?
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] ramram:
Its not a magician, it has an Omap processor.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] IamGuest:
Charmer

That's HTC Charmer, not Magician.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] Andy4life:
Ah okay makes sense now... why would anyone want to put a magician case on it?
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] nighelfs:
Re: Charmer

really... i'm confused now.. anyway, can i make this to run under English OS?

thanks.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] Deleted member 265814:
The Magician and Charmer have the same design(case). T-mobile sales them as MDA Compact and Compact II. The Compact is in silver, the Compact II is in a dark silver ; )

Use a HTC Charmer Rom, i think there's one on the ftp.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] nighelfs:
thanks alot everyone, sorry for confusion. :)
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] sohaibrafiq:
To Nighelfs

Hi Nighelfs,

I hav imate Jam Same as ur MDA.

I also want WM5.0 in my Jam.

Can u help me from where did u got the ROM WM5.0 for ur Mobile ??

and it requires ROM more than 64Mb ??? is this true ?

I hav 64Mb RAM and 64MB Rom

Help me out please...
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] Deleted member 265814:
It's posted here so many times... NO WM 5 FOR THE MAGICIAN (this includes i-mate Jam) !!!
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] hanmin:
Incase you want to know, you can flash its ROM with aWizard (I did that before). Do a search in this forum.

BTW, you can tell it is an MDA Compact with pink/black face is a Charmer. And the face plate is plastic, while Magician (as I heard) is made of 'metal'.
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
How many of you know that the MSM8960Pro found in the Moto X uses most of the silicon found in the Snapdragon 600? There's a lot of confusion concerning this.

The only thing we're missing is LPDDR3 support, which probably would've cost too much to change (no room in the dual-core die); 200MHz increase in clock speed was also passed up. So, it's not a binned S600. It's a custom SoC for Motorola.

So, Qualcomm updated the CPU cores from Krait 200 to 300 (IPC increases), and also threw in the latest Adreno 320 for good measure (higher performance, fill rate, GFLOPS). It's a win for us.

The Nexus 4 and 2013 Nexus 7 use the older Adreno 320 and Krait 200 cores (the Nexus 7 uses a similar higher performing Adreno 320 though). It shows, sometimes.
[Moto X General] Marcb:
I didn't think it was a secret that the dual core on the Moto X is based on the Snapdragon 600 and not the S4...
[Moto X General] DroidOnRoids:
Source?
[Moto X General] Julianocas:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)

Excluding the "new/old" Adreno 320.
[Moto X General] gtg465x:
Yep, known this all along. X8 is more like a dual-core S600 (as compared to the quad-core S600 found in the GS4 and HTC One) than a dual-core S4 Pro (as compared to the quad-core S4 Pro found in the Nexus 4). Motorola really did a disservice to themselves by calling it an S4 Pro, but since their chip was customized and somewhere in between the standard S4 Pro and standard S600, I suspect the Qualcomm marketing department forced them to round down instead of up in regards to naming.
[Moto X General] MichaelMcEntire:
I mentioned this once and was told I was wrong. Nice to see confirmation.
[Moto X General] T-Keith:
It's unfortunate that qualcom's naming scheme is so confusing/misleading. I honestly think the "s4" branding of the cpu has cost Motorola a lot of sales. Even though as you pointed out, it really is undeserved.
[Moto X General] _delice_doluca_:
I really think it is a progress. I believe Google is trying to change the understanding of the Android world. For example in my country (Turkey) nowadays, people are using the word of "trash" a lot in the biggest mobile tech forums. The main reason to that is the mark the hardware and then mark the device like an OS-less PC. The biggest and the most up-to-date example is Nexus 5. Everyone says it has no change in front of G2 because of its lower camera and 2300mAh battery. Only rare of them are taking software, design, direct updates etc. into account. An nearly all Samsung users make the same calculation. They believe the greater and newer the hardware (I mean SoC) the longer the phone will live.. We all know that is wrong with Samsung's closed-sourced mentality but many does not. So they count the cores :)

I believe Google will change that in the future with more low end devices and ligher software and more compatetive prices..
[Moto X General] jspradling7:
I'm a bit of a Samsung fan. I guess we have a bit of favoritism toward the first smartphone we really get in to, and also I really like the Galaxy series. I have owned/own HTC's, LG's, and Moto's too. But the Moto X has made me appreciate the overall performance of the device and to not focus so much on the specs of the hardware. If the device performs as it should, I don't care if it has a single core and 1 gig of ram. Just my 2 cents.
[Moto X General] Darth:
This ^

I've played with most the "top" phones and the Moto x stands up to all of them....or better in some cases. Throw in the battery life I'm getting....and it pulls even further ahead of most the flagships.

That's to my eye anyway. And no, I didn't play games on them, cause I don't personally play "big" games on my phone.

That's made me extremely happy with the phone I picked. ;)

Sent from my Moto X cellular telephone...
[Moto X General] ShensMobile:
Incorrect. The 2013 Nexus 7 uses Krait 300 cores.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)

The chip for the Nexus 7 is: APQ8064–1AA (Advertised as S4 Pro)
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
That's good to know, since I have a 2013 Nexus 7 LTE. It wouldn't make sense to use an older Adreno 320 at 1920x1200. Still, it's not quite as smooth as the Moto X, which is interesting. Software clearly has a role to play.

Anandtech showed how the Moto X gets its performance. The dual cores are tasked higher than the quads, which gives a nice boost.
[Moto X General] ShensMobile:
Wait what? No, the GPU is still the same. An Adreno 320 is an Adreno 320 (as far as I know). It's the CPU that uses the Krait 300 cores. That's why the Nexus 7 is less smooth than the Moto X, due to the resolution difference. However, in raw computational speed, the Nexus 7 should beat the Moto X due to the increased number of Krait 300 cores (4 vs 2).
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
No, there are different Adreno 320s. The one from the S600 isn't the same as the S4 Pro in the Nexus 4.
[Moto X General] ShensMobile:
Do you have a source for how the Adreno 320's are different? The Wikipedia page for Adreno only specifies one 320 chip, which is used in the S4 Pro, S4 Prime, and Snapdraon 600 series.
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
This should prove it is not the same:

Offscreen is 1080p. The results are inline with the Snapdragon 600 Adreno 320s, NOT the original APQ8064 in the Nexus 4.

You can compare this to the HTC One w/ an S600 (not OC'd AFAIK): http://www.anandtech.com/show/6747/htc-one-review/13

Also, look at the GFLOPS increases in the Adreno Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adreno

51.2 (1gen-S4 pro)/86,4(2gen-S600)/97.2 (S600 AB)

GFLOPS increased on the order of about 1.6x
[Moto X General] ShensMobile:
That's very interesting. I did some more digging and can't find any conclusive evidence on the differences in the Adreno 320's seen on different dies. One source did quote Qualcomm saying that the 320 on the S600 should be able to clock in at higher speeds than the 320 in the S4 Pro in the Nexus 4 though.

Cool, thanks for the heads up!
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
The S600 AB is used in the Galaxy S4, so the Adreno 320 in that isn't equal to ours as the clock increases to 450MHz over the 400MHz found in the Moto X and HTC One. Plus, Samsung pushes it to 480MHz in certain scenarios.

So, we have a given GFLOPS rating of 86.4, while the GS4 has 97.2. Most high-end discrete graphics chips in PCs are over 1.0 TFLOPS (or 1000 GFLOPS). So, I'm not sure why manufacturers keep pushing resolutions higher.

And we're still on LPDDR2, but the great thing is that we have lower CAS and other latencies than LPDDR3; DDR3 gets around that with pure speed. We're just down on ultimate bandwidth, so bandwidth limited scenrios will show a hit.
[Moto X General] phoenix_rizzen:
The difference is due to GPU clock speed. The S4Pro GPU is clocked slower than the S600 GPU.

Everything else about the GPU hardware is the same.
[Moto X General] ShensMobile:
Yes, you two are correct. My bad, I guess I've just been looking at too many numbers this morning.
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
Eh, no.

The original S4 Pro's Adreno 320 has 64 ALUs and a GFLOPS rate of 51.2 (400MHz).

The revised S600 Adreno 320 has 96 ALUs (this accounts for the GFLOPS increase at the SAME 400MHz speeds) - 86.4 GFLOPS

The S600 AB's Adreno 320 has 96 ALUs AND a clock speed increase to 450MHz, which allows for 97.2 GFLOPS.

ALU = arithmetic and logic unit

More ALUs = more performance per clock
[Moto X General] ShensMobile:
Do you have a source for this though? I don't think you're lying, but I'd like to have sources for backing up future arguments on Reddit :P
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
The very high fill rate is a source in itself. You don't get high fill rates without the hardware to back it up.

The rest was deduced by others because there's no other way to get performance per clock increases without adding ALUs or significantly increasing the efficiency of the various portions of the GPU. The latter requires a complete redesign (similar to AMD moving from VLIW to GCN cores), while the former can be managed by improving die density (at the expense of ultimate clock speeds). Adding ALUs won't help in the case of a bottleneck elsewhere in the GPU. GPUs are usually memory bandwidth limited, but can also be slowed down by various pipeline deficiencies.

It doesn't help that Qualcomm is very secretive about the GPU, but if they're following ATI/AMD's architecture improvements then we'll definitely start seeing huge performance gains in the future. Adreno is an anagram for Radeon, since Qualcomm bought AMD's mobile graphics division.

The Adreno wiki shows the 3 GFLOPS ratings for the Adreno 320. I linked it in a previous post.
[Moto X General] mistermojorizin:
You mention the HTC One earlier in the thread; i was just reading that they use gaming scripts on the HTC to keep the adreno (and cpu) from being *CRIPPLED* when 1) tilt controls are used and when 2) temps get to a certain arbitrarily set by the OEM threshold. So game performance suffers. Do you happen to have any idea if these scripts would work on moto x (and by extension the dmaxx)?
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
Interesting. Since the Moto X and Droid Ultra/Maxx offload sensor data to a custom DSP (sensor hub), I don't think they'd need it. The thermal loads will also be lower since the Moto X only has 2 CPU cores (versus the 4 in the One).

I've played 3D games for hours on the X with no loss in performance, so it seems Qualcomm has reduced thermal throttling in their new chips. A lot depends on the manufacturer's cooling solution, if necessary, too. Some use heatsinks (on the entire SoC) to push the GPU to higher frequencies, for example. AFAIK, Motorola is running the stock 400MHz, which is the same as the HTC One's Adreno 320.
[Moto X General] @rbiter:
The GPU in moto probably rarely steps up to its highest stepping because we are only running 720p which is a cakewalk for the 320.

Sent from my XT1053 using HoFo mobile app.
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
I've been running with Force 4xMSAA on, and it doesn't incur a significant performance penalty. There are advantages in running 720p. I love getting rid of those jaggies in 3D games. Final Fantasy 4 looks very good with 4xMSAA on.
[Moto X General] vtmike:
Do you guys know what exactly is being measured in antutu for ram speed and ram operation. I compared some devices I have (13 nexus 7, nexus 4, moto x) after reading the x has ddr2. I think 13 n7 is ddr3, and nexus 4 is ddr2. I had interesting results. N7 and moto x have similar ram speeds of 1700, but n7 has higher ram operation, 1100 vs 650. N4 has slower ram speed of 1000 but higher ram operation at 1000. Not sure what these numbers mean. If both the n4 and x have similar ddr2 I would have thought they would have similar results.
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
RAM operation could be per-core, which is why the X would show a disadvantage as both the N7 and N4 are quad-cores.
[Moto X General] vtmike:
There seems to be a correlation between number of cores and the ram operation score. So the moto x may have ddr3 or significantly faster ddr2 than the nexus 4.
[Moto X General] vtmike:
So I've ran some more benchmarks that I could find that measure ram speed. My 13 nexus 7 and moto x get close to the same score on all benchmarks I could find. Moto x has a slight advantage in most. The moto x and n7 are at least 1.5 times quicker than my nexus 4 in the tests I've found. 2013 nexus 7 has lpddr3 1600 MHz, nexus 4 has lpdr2 533 MHz (dual channel).
[Moto X General] iSaoHatake:
The main thing everyone here is missing, is that Moto X also have software optimization, it looks like Stock, but it's not, this is why Moto x can be faster than even Galaxy S5 or others snapdragons 800's. Who has a Macbook here?Never asked why some games run better on windows than on Mac OS X? Never asked why Mac OS run better than windows? For example, Minecraft on my MacBook Pro 2012 run with 280 - 320 FPS on Mac OS X, on windows it raises to around 400, and with linux minecraft pass 700 fps and counting. I don't know you guys but i will never trust in numbers, because it's not the math that is important, it's the chemical, is the reaction between everything, not just hardware, not just numbers.
[Moto X General] vtmike:
Take what you will from the results, but the ram read and write speeds are pretty much identical with a 13 nexus 7. Anyone else have any s600 or s800 devices to compare.
[Moto X General] iSaoHatake:
The problem i'm talking about, is that some people just look at specs and forget other things, some people ask why Moto X seems better and faster than Nexus 5. You have to look not just at processor, memory or GPU, look at the display, the manufacture, and other things. I had a Galaxy SIII, Nexus 4, than a Galaxy S4, Galaxy SIII was lot better than Nexus 4, but Galaxy S4 was never better than Moto x, my latest phone in specs is less than Nexus 5(Brother phone) and my previous phone, but do a better job. My Brother can't play Survivalcraft(Like Minecraft based game but with infinity world) with 96 chunks of draw distance without Lag, my moto X run the game smoothly with 160 experimental draw distance. Netxus 5 with 128 draw distance lag a lot on his handset, i know Nexus 5 have a 1080p display, but it's about memory too, that cache the draw distance.

I don't know you, but i undestand what you want to say, and i believe that specs count, but not at all. We have a good phone because two things, Motorola knows how to do better phones, but don't have money, Google don't know how to do better phones, but have money, they have combined the best of two, and made Moto X. Motorola complain yet about how they could do a better job if google had put more money.

It's not just about hardware, moto x have the best software and the best design i ever saw. I'm talked about android only, but i'm a very satisfied iPhone user, but i like the way android let me customize my Phone, for me, Moto X is the only one that could beat iPhone, i think because it was underestimated, was not as popular as it could be. Now with Lenovo, i don't know if we will have updates and fixes :\
[Moto X General] vtmike:
I've seen sources with conflicting reports on the moto x having ddr2 and ddr3 ram. I just did some benchmarks that measure ram speed. Based on the results it appears to be ddr3. That's the only point I'm trying to make.
[Moto X General] iSaoHatake:
Hum, yeah now i understand, sure, i just talking about the OP :P.
[Moto X General] Jason.DROID:
It's LPDDR2-1066 (533MHz physical), but that doesn't mean it can't be clocked higher, unofficially. You have to remember that while LPDDR3 ultimately has more bandwidth and higher speeds, it also has higher CAS and other latencies (they take longer cycles). The speed of the RAM is supposed to account for this, which is why we generally see an improvement in performance with DDR3 over DDR2; however, DDR2 can be faster in certain scenarios where the speed of DDR3 can't match the lower latencies of DDR2. Also, if an SoC can't fully saturate DDR3, there won't be any obvious benefit. Bandwidth mostly comes into play in intensive CPU loading, but is most important to the GPU.

Also, a lot depends on the SoC memory bus width.

2012 APQ8064 (S4 Pro Quad-core) is dual channel 32-bit (16by16)

2013 APQ8064T (S600, including MSM8960Pro in Moto X) is dual channel 32-bit (16by16)

2013 MSM8974 (S800) and 2014 MSM8974AC (S801) are dual channel 64-bit (32by32) - effectively doubles bandwidth of both DDR2 and DDR3

2014 APQ8084 (S805) is dual channel 128-bit (64x64) - effectively doubling bandwidth over 64-bit and quadrupling over 32-bit

The Moto X uses either SK Hynix or Samsung LPDDR2-1066 RAM. Maximum bandwidth with a 32-bit dual channel bus is 4.264GB/s versus 6.400GB/s using DDR3-1600. I'd think it'd be a wash, personally.

The LPDDR2 parts do have programmable read and write latencies, so Motorola must've taken particular care in programming these.

If we assume the DDR2-1066 RAM has a CAS latency of 3 (not likely, but it's an example), that's 3/1066 or 0.002814s, while DDR3-1600 has a latency of 9, or 9/1600, so 0.005625s, so DDR2-1066 with its lower latency is nearly twice as fast per operation than DDR3-1600 with higher latencies. Frequency is just cycles per second, and latency is the amount of cycles it takes to respond.

It's not just about speed, but latency is a crucial factor in performance too.
[Moto X General] enik_fox:
Let's be honest. Qualcomm totally messed up its naming. The new nexus 7 has 4 krait 300 cores with an adreno 320 but because of its clock frequency it is an s4 pro. The dual core snapdragon 400 is two krait 200 cores with an adreno 305 gpu. Why not just call it an s4 plus? There just seems to be no rhyme or reason too it.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Anyone knows how to save a network stream by a name so you don't have to search it anymore?

NOTE 3 - Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Bump

I tried to save my streaming links in notepad and save it to. Flv to play it. Works great on pc but not on the N3.

NOTE 3 - Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
update; I can play the stream with vlc

Why can't I play it with Mxplayer?

It's just a stream link converted to. Flv in notepad?

NOTE 3 - Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GuestK00445:
Wrong place to ask.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
?

NOTE 3 - Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Bump

NOTE 3 - Tapatalk
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sbi1:
Not even at slower speed? AT&T said that mobile data doesn't work because it's a 3g sim and this is a LTE phone.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tangosierra_:
I use a 3G sim in my d821 and 3G works fine
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sbi1:
So you just popped the SIM in the phone and it works, or did you need to make some modifications to settings?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ben_pyett:
I don't know specifically about AT&T network, but that sounds like a load of BS!

I've used a standard SIM, a few years old, so before 4g existed, which is data enabled in my N5 and have happily used 2g/3g/H/H+.

Only last week did I upgrade to a 4g contract with new SIM
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sbi1:
Of course it's load of BS! We called again, asked to speak with a supervisor, but there are 4 people ahead of me, they immediately gave me a $30 credit for the data plan and sending me new SIM.

Still, that's BS, it should work without any problem.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tangosierra_:
yep i did. I'm using the phone in singapore on a 3G plan and there's no modification to any settings needed (at least for my case). It should be the same throughout, the most would be having to set up apn and stuff.