yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Airtioteclint:
Ok it's working again. Never seen that setting before thanks. :good:

P. S didn't you use to theme for the connect and esteem?
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] ShinySide:
Haha yea before I left being a guide/af member
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] kieeps:
Any idea why my data keeps turning off when i lock the phone? Figured i'd check if anyone had the same problem with a possible fix before factory reset :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] ErnestMBE:
I had the exact same thing for a while, across a couple of different roms, factory reset didn't even work. Ended up being a modem problem for me, I flashed one of the most recent ones and it sorted it (I hadn't updated my modem for a while as the one I had was fine). Not saying it'll definitely work for you, but it did for me.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] kieeps:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2192025

Will a modem from there work? I honestly have no idea where to find stuff for this device ;-D
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] ErnestMBE:
Yeah that'll do it, just obviously make sure it's one for the I9505 and you flash it properly via odin.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] kieeps:
Have not had the time to test yet, flashing with mobile Odin doesn't seem to work so will have to try it when I get home.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] trein91:
Feature request: Clear RAM on bottom right instead of left? And let us have memory ram bar on top instead of bottom ><
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Zephyr!:
Supports GT-I9500?

And if Yes then is Camera quality closer to TW ? :)

Regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] DesertEagleSlim:
Update center for 12-4 keeps downloading a like 10kb file and saying its complete. Which is obviously incorrect. The update website only shows up to 12-2. What's the issue? Any idea/help? Thanks boss.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] NZgeek:
I believe there is a version for the I9500. Make sure you get that version, not the jflte version, otherwise it won't work.

The camera quality is about the same as CM, which some people complain isn't as good as the TW camera. I don't see any problem. There's no difference in quality. The biggest difference is in the tone curve that's applied to the shot, and the TW tone curve has been tweaked to better suit the camera hardware.

If you want to get photos that are closer to what the TW camera produces, you can always edit the images and adjust the contrast and saturation. Otherwise, you could try to find a camera app that allows you to adjust the settings that are applied to each shot.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Zephyr!:
Thanks for the Info mate :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] bigal1542:
Is anyone having issues with the latest update changelogs on the nameless app? For me, all of the changelogs just show a small zip file and no actual changelog.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] ShinySide:
Because there's no updates and builds are on a timer to build automatically
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] bigal1542:
Awesome. Thanks!

So is it safe to assume the latest build is the last one before 5.0?
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] ShinySide:
Sorta. My guess, youll definitely see no added features to 4.4.4. Little bug fixes or security fixes probably until NL 4.4.4 is officially EOL'd , in which when EOL'd, 5.0 will be full time regular nightlies.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] DesertEagleSlim:
Ok this is a little odd. When I turn Bluetoothon and send a file, pic etc.. My wWiFi turns off. Until Iturn bt back off. Any ideas? On newest version
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] auiterwaal:
It's a common issue of CM11. No fix yet as far as I know...
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] sh4z:
Delete
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] krad54:
Delete
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] justaguyh:
is there anywhere the "ambient display" option?

ambient display is an option to wake the device on notification (or when it's picked up - i believe that's only on nexus or something like that).

is it available here in the nameless rom? i would like it.

great rom.

working awesome...

thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] krinyo75:
I see the life has stopped here? No rom since 12/15/2014?
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] angiest:
Probably working on Lollipop.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] shiruuu.samad:
Guys can I flash this rom on s4 i9500?
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] NZgeek:
Have you tried checking the thread to see if anyone else has asked the same question? You know, like the forum rules require?

If you had, you might have seen the answers 1 whole pack back. Or maybe the post I made about 6 months ago.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] shiruuu.samad:
Sorry.No one in the i9500 is not familiar with this rom.noYoutube videos nor revies for this rom for i9500.So i thought this rom may be incapable.Sorry for lack of research this is my first rom ever:(
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Evisceration:
we are working on lollipop and kitkat reached its EOL (End Of Life) :)

we are working on getting the rom stable enough for our taste and once done, the Samsung Galaxy S4 will receive nightlies for it.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] unomedmen1:
Will the builds be variant specific or unified?
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] shiruuu.samad:
Guys have been using this rom for about a day. But I have a huge problem. Battery drains from 100 to 0 percentage overnight. It's is caused by com.system.ui and android system. Using greenify. Any workout.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] churchey360:
Edit.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] gio_b:
Hi ,not able to download the rom ,even desktop request "on"

Download only nightly ,any link ?

Gapps is down.any gapps is valid ?

Giovanni.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] migge79:
take the latest build from their sourceforge page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/namelessrom/files/android-4.4/i9500/ .

that is the latest built for galaxy s4.

been using the jflte-build now for a few weeks and i can say, its stable.

about the gapps, all 4.4.4 gapps should work. i took the slimrom gapps, because i had them installed before. i also think (but i dont know) they are optimized for slim-dpi, which i also use for this rom.

if you just want actual gapps, take a look there: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2397942

take the one that fits your needs.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] kieeps:
I'm gonna suggest what i usualy hate.

Do a full nand backup and backup all your apps+data with titanium backup (or simular)

The do factory reset and reflash, if the phone does not drain over night you can start restoring apps+data again. If the problem comes back after app restore you have the problem in one of the apps.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] ipaq3115:
Is the jflte version not up anymore or am I just missing it? Sourceforge says the jflte folder doesn't exist.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] angiest:
AFAIK, they haven't started work on Nameless 2.0 for jflte* yet.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Evisceration:
the folder structure changed on sourceforge, will update the op.

though we have not started to work on lollipop for the jflte yet as i do not use it as my daily driver anymore (broken screen)
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] ipaq3115:
Thanks! I guess I should have looked a little harder.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] nativeridge:
Made a bootanimation for those that may want to use :)

[IMG="bootanimation"]http://i.imgur.com/PF5g1Kw.gif[/IMG]

zip file here

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71868796/nameless.zip
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] DesertEagleSlim:
Awesome boot ani. My only issue is its not centered and oddly too large for my screen. Positioned toward top of screen. Any ideas? My dpi setting is 400.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Jmjguru:
Looks fine on 480dpi.. Beautiful work, I'm gonna use it. :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] nativeridge:
your welcome and thank-you!
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Jmjguru:
It is a bit big actually, had only checked a preview of it. Easy fixed though by changing the values in desc.txt within the .zip to 1080 1920.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] nativeridge:
yes I made for my Find 7 :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Soufiansky:
This rom still alive ?
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] DesertEagleSlim:
Yes but not 4.4.4 they are "apparently" working on port for 5.0+ for us. I've tried other 5.0+ Roms and I feel art is slower than dalvik on my phone just the boot up and optimize situation is so much slower. Besides this 4.4.4 rom is awesome runs flawless on my s4 right now. Using last build.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] angiest:
From my own experience, ART is much slower when rebuilding cache. Beyond that, I don't know how much of the performance issues I have with lollipop are due to ART, or due to the fact the 5 is just new. Some of the issues appear to be present on other devices, including Nexuses.

Currently I use AICP on my phone, which has so far been the best Lollipop ROM for the jfltespr. I'd love to come back to Nameless on this phone, but since I am eligible to upgrade I may be on a Nexus 6 by the time we get a Lollipop ROM from Nameless
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] SnoopyDog:
Rebuilding the cache is much slower on ART than on Dalvik but this the only thing. And how often does this happen? Only once on the first boot after installing a firmware...

When you USE your phone, it is faster on ART....
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] Battlehero:
Still waiting patiently

I hope the ROM will be ready soon :fingers-crossed:
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] churchey360:
Will there be s4 lollipop builds? That would awsome
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] lichan:
There are 5.0.2 nightlies up on http://sourceforge.net/projects/namelessrom/files/.

I'm not sure if it will work on our phones or not but it is certainly worth a shot.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] MartelKombat:
No jflte(xx) build :/. this means we must wait for a build.
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] shoaibjan:
is it save to flash this rom on Galaxy S4 (SPH-L720) sprint???
[Samsung Galaxy S 4 Unified Development] JusTeN_:
Does it support m919? Tmo
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Evisceration:
What is NamelessROM?

NamelessROM Gerrit Review

NamelessROM Youtube

For video reviews and stuff :highfive:

ANNOUNCEMENT: We are looking for Device Maintainers to expand our support, please visit our IRC channel or PM [MENTION=3878813]jakew02[/MENTION], [MENTION=4833385]Evisceration[/MENTION] or [MENTION=5346995]jumoog[/MENTION] for information

Got a bug report? Want to request a feature? Need extended support?

NamelessROM Forums

http://NamelessROM IRC

Or from your IRC client:

Server: irc.freenode.net

Channels: General Discussion - #namelessrom

Development Discussion - #namelessrom-dev
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Evisceration:
here
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Evisceration:
screenshots 02/04/2014
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] hednik:
interesting... Is this CM based ? Omni ? I have to say I'm confused
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Nice to see you Jake, looking forward to a test drive but right now the download takes me to a survey
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
we are currently using a CM base but have made major modifications to it, proprietary NamelessROM stuff as well as several features from other AOSP roms such as OmniROM, AOKP, Slim, etc.

i'll fix that, i was between classes when i posted and didn't have time to revise it -- doing that now..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Got it, going to flash and take a look now

Thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] SelfElevated2:
You should build a pacman like Rom. With all the features of everything from everywhere
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Right now I am impressed with what I see. As far as performance this Kat is the best benchmark I have logged on 4.4. I like the customization so far, would like to see a few more options with the buttons such as power off etc. Battery seems to be very stable and holding steady. Rom is nice and smooth.

Guess I'll have to come up with a new signature banner
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Tryer1234:
Could you please post a list of features included in the ROM somewhere? I can't seem to find one on your site or its forums, unless I missed something.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] hednik:
Make a backup and flash it to see...works every time
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Buddyjohn:
look at post #2 jake may add more features later. but that is a good start for now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] CPA Poke:
[MENTION=3878813]jakew02[/MENTION] Just so I understand correctly...the reason that flashing custom kernels on Nameless and Omni causes display issues is because the Omni kernel has components that the CM kernel does not have? Or is it the other way around? I love both Omni and Nameless, but I also am attached to my custom kernels lol.

Is there one particular thing in the framework that depends on having the Omni kernel? Ie is there a certain thing I could pull from the Omni kernel and use to kang the custom CM-based kernels to be fully compatible?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
I do know that the KT Kernal doesn't marry up well, had to reflash after flashing it. Just wanted to try it to compare, and now I know the rest of the story
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] nyydynasty:
only issue i've come across is the battery icon. Upon reboot, i lose the circle battery with %. I have to toggle the option that enables percentage display and the circle icon reappears.

Otherwise, everything else is good so far!

thanks a lot!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
the problem with the custom kernels, ie with ktoonsez's kernel, is that he's updated the kernel-side drivers to the Flo adreno stuff, but we aren't building omni or this with the device-side or blob-side stuff, so it causes a mismatch, hence the errors. I'll see if I can't get it to work with the device stuff in, but not the kernel stuff, therefore making it compatible with both kernels with and without the updated flo stuff, but i doubt that will work. maybe we should just bite the bullet and add the flo stuff :silly:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] southpaw2:
Great rom no problems that i am aware of. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
With your stock kernal I'm getting better performance than any other KitKat, KT did not help with the 01-05 version and mismatched as you say very badly with the 01-13 update which I guess is the side stuff added I presume. All I know is I can leave this build on my device without the urge to flash back to Liquid v2.37.

Thanks again for your efforts and time spent
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] CPA Poke:
Awesome, thanks for clarifying.

So when you say the ROMs aren't built with the device-side or blob-side stuff, are there specific blobs from vendor/samsung and device/samsung/jf-common that are in CM's repos but not AOSP's? If so I'd love to know which ones so I could just cherry-pick them from CM and build this for my personal use :)

Edit: I just realized that my last question isn't really that easy to answer without you wading through the CM and TheMuppets repo commits...I can do that, but if you happen to know which project(s) are missing the blobs, that would help tremendously!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
haha yes, Evisceration said it pretty well when he said in the jfltexx forum "why would we put the drivers for a different piece of hardware in the source?"

makes sense to me, maybe the kernel devs can be convinced to release kernels that don't include the flo adreno stuff.

but yea you could probably get away with using CM's blobs as they are now, but there are several commits that you can see regarding "Flo Adreno" , you can click the "jf-common" folder and then click "History" button for all the commits made that affected the "jf-common" folder. then you will see them, probably on page 2 or 3 :highfive:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] rust991:
Hey there. Just want to say that your Roms have been great. So far among my favorites. I just have one question about this one. Does it have the ir working?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Buddyjohn:
are you using xposed? i had a similar issue like that since i had a few modules modifying the status bar.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] nyydynasty:
no xposed, here. No big deal though. It only happens upon reboot or sometimes it'll change when I charge the phone. if that's my negative feedback, this ROM is looking good -lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Buddyjohn:
fair enough, well. if it bugs you enough to do something about it, use xposed haha, simplest fix for a minor bug :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] nyydynasty:
Actually, one problem I just noticed is when playing videos. Whether it's via youtube or Instagram, videos have thick grey lines thru them and you can't see anything. Audio is fine.

Anyone else have this issue?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] southpaw2:
I am getting that as well.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] nyydynasty:
i've seen other people report this in the other 4.4.x threads so I guess its a KK issue
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Buddyjohn:
The issue for the grey is actually a cm error.

They mergged half of the commits needed for a CAF part of the rom which caused this issue. As soom as the rest are merged the issue will go away
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] nyydynasty:
thanks for the info. its good to know
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Buddyjohn:
you are welcome.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Is there a chance we'll see a changelog in the OP or in the forum? I'm flashing daily but don't see much changes
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Buddyjohn:
Good point. Lately though most devs now are just using the gerrit for nightly changelogs.

Link: http://gerrit.nameless-rom.org/#/q/status:merged,n,z
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
jumoog has a script that I can set to run and output to somewhere on our website for you guys.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
I just figured out we can see what's going on in the Gerrit Review in OP, right now there is a couple hang ups with a few of my apps, really haven't noticed anythng major with the Rom itself. Reverted back to trusty Liquid. Wondering if KitKat will ever get close to the benchmarks I get with Liquid v2.37. This one is about as good as it gets but still is 1000-1200 below.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
I'm not sure what the big thing with benchmarks is. Personally I've never taken a benchmark. We make this ROM with no thought to benchmarks, but to performance and stability. I'd rather have a ROM that is reliable and operates smooth and properly than one that has top benchmarks :good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
You are correct it just seems the better the benchmark the fewer twitches I get with custom roms. I'm with nameless don't get me wrong it's the best of KitKat right now as far as I'm concerned. I messed around with kernals as such the past few days so I thing I will clean flash the latest build and let it settle for a few days
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
yea, i mean it could have the worst benchmark and honestly I wouldn't care as long as it's smooth and not glitchy or whatever, but everything is working well?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Understand, just clean flashed and can't seem to get most of my apps to load in Gapps, gonna try it again
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
What?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
I meant I understand what you are saying about benchmarks, I re-flashed and all is well
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
no about the gapps thing, what do you mean that the apps wont load through gapps?

if your using Bans Gapps it's because he doesn't put nearly as many apps in his package compared to PA 0-day
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
That was it I think I started out using Bans, used it the last time and the apps in play store just showed loading but never did. Re-flashed with PA and all was fine.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
oh like installing? i've had that error with all gapps packages, just open recents, clear PlayStore from the recents, and open it back up, and apps will resume downloading/installing.

it's a playstore error

tonight's nightly:

- SmartCapture

- TrueView

- Circular Memory Indicator for recents removed

- Added RAM bar in recents

- some other camera updates

- fstrimmer from DeviceControl is no longer set on boot, so DeviceControl will stop consistently asking for root access, which is what was causing the constant popup from Superuser

- camera UI updated to have white in place of the ICS/JB blue - make it more "kitkat-like"

- camera updated for TRDS to have actually dark stuffs in it now

- QuickUnlock option brought back

- battery icon will now be orange for a little bit before turning red, starting at 15% battery

- boot process has been optimized by removing some stuff

- added option to choose the screen-off animation
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Ok the latest build is rock solid and very quick. I have been stubborn with setting up my device but this time I decided to use the stock launcher and set things up using it instead of Nova Prime or Apex Pro. I must say I am getting better response and things are working nicely. Thanks to the NamelessROM team and their efforts
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Quick question just what is the Test9 latest download?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] Gandalf:
my test builds :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] southpaw2:
is it cdn?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
Thanks Jake, one more issue with the latest build. Tried a backup and failed had to switch my backup location from SDCard to Internal for it to work. Never had this issue until 01-22
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] JRW 28:
Awesome ROM with some very cool features! Has anyone found some battery saving tip on this though? Not saying it has terrible battery life but I'm not getting close to a full day at all and I run the same exact settings on every ROM I run. Any tips or what are y'all running in performance settings?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
I'm retired so I don't push my device very hard and you are right the battery life is draining faster than some. I'm running everything stock right now been trying to get this baby married up with KT Kernal but it doesn't want to play nice so far
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] JRW 28:
Yea I've tried Alucards from the international S4 and KT's kernel and both are having same results and not playing well so IDK
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Original Android Developme] PapaMag:
I am not sure what the issue is with Nameless. I am running a different Kat right now and the battery life if awesome when comparing the two Rom's