yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] istux:
I like your rude style while saying the truth :laugh:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] romcio47:
Well I didn't want to be rude but this is pure truth. After seeing sooo many petitions about many different things connected to Sony and Xperia devices I can clearly say that even this time it still won't work.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] GtrCraft:
I expected this comments somewhere :p
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] VitorMSA:
I agree
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Fahrertuer:
What a waste of time and effort.

There are only two reliable ETAs for software:

1) Don't state an ETA

2) Announce an ETA in the far future (and propably still miss the deadline) and hold the Update until the apropriate time has arrived
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] AngelBob:
Leave them to sort it out.

The Z 4.3 came quick and is buggy.

So many things missing too like transparent nav bar.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] thedisturbedone:
This is ridiculous! All the people who do not **** know about software development are getting butt hurt. No matter how well you plan, no matter how well you design it and implement it, there are always.. and I mean ALWAYS bugs at the testing phase. Doesn't matter how familiar you are with the platform or device, you can never design a 100% working software. Rigorous testing is needed. And even when testing, there are short term bugs as well as long term bugs. I am guessing they found the latter, which is why they pulled it in the last moment.

I was disappointed until the leaked version was released, because I thought they were going to back off. But hey they didn't! You can never be mad at a developer in the testing phase. They are doing that so that you can have perfection. And I personally know how ****ing annoying it could get when the customers start nagging!
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] exeon:
Many people think that we're rushing to get the 4.3 FW as soon as possible but actually we don't mind waiting, we just hope to get a simple explanation of the delay, simple as that. If Sony announce that the 4.3 FW will be delayed for about 6 months(make it big) because of some bugs found which need more time to be fixed, I can accept that and give them a :good: because I get respect from Sony and it delights me(customer).

PS: Well, at least for me, I feel it this way. Just sharing the thoughts. :p
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] ravijokhun:
Seriously????? :eek:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Yea I am serious...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] ravijokhun:
I think we really need to have some more patience....Sony is only 15 days late, considering end of year holidays and other stuff its much less.

By the looks of the leaked 4.3 ive been using since release. the new rom is awesome.....if sony is taking more time to make it even better so be it.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Our PTCRB build was removed did you see that??
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Guys thank you for supporting we now have 600 supporters
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Darkierage:
I dont understand you guys and I am going to support CH why? Because I am totally agree with him about letting us what is going about our update. Sony said new update will be at december last year and there is no hear about it for now. I agree with you about getting fixed firmware is better then bugy one but they could inform us about deley. Even short notification would be enough. And it just looks lame when on sony site there is still information about incoming update in December. To sum up its fine they are working on it and its deleyed but totally they should told about it. (Sorry for my english ..)

Wysłane z mojego LT30p za pomocą Tapatalk 4
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pwlsrs:
srsly?

http://www.ptcrb.com/vendor/complete/view_complete_request_guest.cfm?modelid=21834
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] randymess:
Mother of God!! :eek: :rolleyes:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] romcio47:
Still I think there is no need to sign the petition:

https://mobile.twitter.com/sonyxperia

Their official Twitter account is literally flooded with requests about our updates. They surely know they're late.

My phone is T. Xperia T.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Can't you see the Jan 7 2014 build was removed... As far as I know it never happened before in PTCRB(Removing of builds)...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
It is not informing sony that they are late they already know they are late :P please read the petition before jumping to conclusions ;)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] adiq_ambro:
Does online petition signed by few hundred people done anything in the past? It's sick that things like phone software updates are matter of public movement, while there are more real problems there which remains ignored.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pwlsrs:
but builds 9.2.A.0.276 (Dec 30, 2013) is still there
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Yeah.... It was a buggy one...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
It did work with X10. Sony. X10 got gingerbread due to a petition signed by few hundred people...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
A good news guys we now have 827 supporters and 20 haters. :D I have contacted Xperia Blog to take a look at the petition and to spread the word for the people who are not in XDA. Thank you for supporting guys. I have to thank [MENTION=4940840]qamu74[/MENTION] and [MENTION=5264779]Sahaab[/MENTION] for supporting me when I received a wave of negative reaction from the fellow XDA users. And also others who signed the petition I thank you all...:D:good:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Bjarne73:
Programming is like having sex, one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life. ;)

Skickat från min GT-P7500 via Tapatalk
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] bigyinn:
What a waste of time and effort.....

Why not create a petition for getting 4.4 on the X10i, because it'll have pretty much the same impact at Sony... (or any other manufacturer).
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
I do not own X10i and its useless when sony gave the announcement as it wont receive 4.4 we petitioning for an already known case...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] GtrCraft:
4.3 is an already known case too. There are just some users who can't handle a delay
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Lol bro I said the same thing we are petitioning for an already known case....
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] GtrCraft:
And you say doing it for kitkat is stupid, well you are doing the same thing now
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] yuskhayru:
Kids now days.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Bro I said doing it for X10i regarding kitkat not our device please read properly...:)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Lol yea... I am a kid.. People support this kid... :)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] silasje1:
This "kid" maybe should try top edit his replies instead of posting double posts (or triple posts) ;)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] bigyinn:
The point I was trying to make is, there is as much point in your petition as there would be in petitioning for 4.4 on the X10i. i.e. None!
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] play3man:
Sony Mobile for Slovakia and Czech Republic just told me that FWs for SP,T and V are rolling out. Lies.. lies everywhere..
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Lol thanks for the

tip...

Thank you bro... I see a point in the petition which I think wont be applicable to X10i...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Gasai Yuno:
And where do you pull this information from?

Do you monitor every single device page on PTCRB daily?

Oh, you tested it? And found bugs?

Because change.org is the International Court in Hague and clearly Sony cares about random crap posted there by kids who have no concept of patience?

Why exactly would anyone give any damns about whatever is there on change.org?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Yup monitoring the PTCRB pages of four devices daily isnt a difficult task you know...

The bugs thing is the common sentence said by everyone for cause of certification and deletion of the new build and thats why we want to the reason behind the delay and thats what's written in the petition...

Well for now 1054 people give a damn on whats going on there...

Have I answered all your questions or do you have some more???
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Nevermind this post was by mistake
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Gasai Yuno:
Four? How about, uh, monitoring all these http://www.ptcrb.com/vendor/complete/complete_request.cfm every day?

Holy gods, we have a major sample, four models, monitored (if you believe this guy) every day since the appearance of these models on PTCRB's site. A whole four out of probably a thousand or more! Obviously based on this representative sample the PTCRB has never ever revoked any certifications before.

What does “common sentence” mean? Did you test the build from December? Which bugs did you find in it?

1054 people from Sony give a damn about that petition? Really?

Update: sorry, I just realised you meant that 1054 kids without any patience give a damn about something that Sony gives no damns about.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Lol bro... As far as I heard PTCRB never revokes certification and did you notice when the jan 7 build was removed some builds were added which weren't there at first place... You can ccompare it and see the screenshot of the PTCRB page when Jan 7 build was there...

People who tested found ram management issues and notification led issues this is a bug isnt it FYI the build was never released in december :P

1054 people who signed it give a damn about what's going there... I cant say how sony would react because its the future I am not a astrologer or psychic to see the future ;)

Any more questions you would like to ask??
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Guys its gaining momentum Xperia Blog decided to cooperate with us and so they tweeted about the petition and now people are tweeting about petition you can see it by searching xperia sp in twitter....;)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Gasai Yuno:
I didn't know you work for PTCRB and thus know if they revoke certificates or not.

Also, to whoever thinks that the removal of a single table entry is a huge deal: imagine… what if the publicly accessible pages only list some firmware revisions instead of everything ever certified and what if the “viewable” status can be changed at will?

I would also like to remind everyone that the supposed “leaked” build is 9.2.A.1.131. Here we witness a drama regarding a previous build.

While I am sure this Chain Hacker person would prefer 9.2.A.0.x builds over 9.2.A.1.x being certified, I think it's all up to Sony and PTCRB itself.

PTCRB's web site's purpose is not really described as “to serve as a rumour mill”.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Thanks for your input.. I would sincerely take it to my mind.. And yea I don't work for PTCRB... If I did I would have served you better...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Guys I made a change on sending the petition to Sony. Now each time you comment why its is important to you or sign it. A mail goes to sony and notifies them. So the more you comment we will catch their attention soon. :D:good:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] GtrCraft:
The more you are talking about this, the more childish it is
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Aadi:
Yup its childish... :D and I am proud to be a child kid whatever you guys call me...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] GtrCraft:
I hope you expect to be reported soon if you keep acting like this
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Arcano:
Two possible outcomes: either they set up a mail filter and move all incoming mail from your petition directly to /dev/null, or they get pissed off and stop announcing future updates; maybe both.

--

Enviado desde mi móvil.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] neneaiancu:
I see a 3rd one. Answer the request, as they did tens of times on twitter: ETA as soon at it will be ready.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Toledo_JAB:
Thread Closed
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GR0S:
No app can mount system as rw, even mount -o rw,remount /system doesn't work

Only adb remount works.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GR0S:
[MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION]

SuperSU zip broken root at all
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
Its been updated .
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mikeioannina:
Hi, since I closed my DEV threads there is no place for discussing development related things.

I've opened this thread so we can discuss any development related stuff (kernel etc).

Please keep the thread clean. I will report any non-low-level development posts.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mikeioannina:
ION kernel status

Kernel boots, lcd backlight is on but no image is shown.

I only get a display full of noise for half a second, after the following error occurs:

[ 8.994812] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 8.995025] WARNING: at /home/mike/android/cm10.1/kernel/semc/msm7x30/kernel/mutex.c:198 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x70/0x27c()
[ 8.995483] Modules linked in:
[ 8.995758] [<c001428c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c008a6f0>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
[ 8.996154] [<c008a6f0>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c008a720>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x1c)
[ 8.996582] [<c008a720>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x1c) from [<c061b524>] (__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x70/0x27c)
[ 8.998138] [<c061b524>] (__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x70/0x27c) from [<c061b73c>] (mutex_lock+0xc/0x24)
[ 9.007171] [<c061b73c>] (mutex_lock+0xc/0x24) from [<c02988dc>] (mddi_host_timer_service+0x374/0x430)
[ 9.016448] [<c02988dc>] (mddi_host_timer_service+0x374/0x430) from [<c00949dc>] (run_timer_softirq+0x18c/0x260)
[ 9.026519] [<c00949dc>] (run_timer_softirq+0x18c/0x260) from [<c008fa1c>] (__do_softirq+0x74/0x120)
[ 9.035705] [<c008fa1c>] (__do_softirq+0x74/0x120) from [<c008fe8c>] (irq_exit+0x44/0xa8)
[ 9.043884] [<c008fe8c>] (irq_exit+0x44/0xa8) from [<c000f08c>] (handle_IRQ+0x68/0x8c)
[ 9.051788] [<c000f08c>] (handle_IRQ+0x68/0x8c) from [<c00084e4>] (vic_handle_irq+0x28/0x30)
[ 9.060119] [<c00084e4>] (vic_handle_irq+0x28/0x30) from [<c000dd80>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x70)
[ 9.068511] Exception stack(0xc0879f58 to 0xc0879fa0)
[ 9.073547] 9f40: ffffffff 000000b0
[ 9.081634] 9f60: 00000001 00000000 c0878000 c0889470 c0908048 c0889464 00204059 511f00f2
[ 9.089874] 9f80: 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0879fa0 c007dbd8 c000f1a0 400b0013 ffffffff
[ 9.098052] [<c000dd80>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x70) from [<c000f1a0>] (default_idle+0x24/0x2c)
[ 9.106201] [<c000f1a0>] (default_idle+0x24/0x2c) from [<c000f458>] (cpu_idle+0x5c/0xac)
[ 9.114196] [<c000f458>] (cpu_idle+0x5c/0xac) from [<c060af7c>] (rest_init+0x84/0x9c)
[ 9.122100] [<c060af7c>] (rest_init+0x84/0x9c) from [<c0840a54>] (start_kernel+0x368/0x3c4)
[ 9.130432] ---[ end trace 826fbc4fa566ec66 ]---

EDIT: Full log with mddi & msm_fb debugging enabled here: http://pastebin.com/Tj1izvyt

I don't see anything useful :(
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] deccan451:
I'm not familiar with these kernel building i know u people [MENTION=4800121]android1234567[/MENTION] [MENTION=5292938]DevConnection_Team[/MENTION] [MENTION=4825437]Christopher83[/MENTION] [MENTION=2941594]johnnyslt[/MENTION] [MENTION=3044346]arco68[/MENTION] can help us building ION kernel for xperia 2011 devices ... sorry if I'm interrupting u .. thank you :)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] :
mike maybe we need some specific changes in qcom_display_caf try to use arco'w variant
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] ReznorNInchNails:
Does kernel panic if you exclude display driver?

Gesendet von meinem Xperia Neo V mit Tapatalk 2
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] johnnyslt:
Where is the stable pmem kernel source? and in what branch [MENTION=3839575]mikeioannina[/MENTION] tried to enable ION?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mikeioannina:
current pmem kernel: https://github.com/LegacyXperia/msm7x30-3.4.x-nAa/commits/cm-10.1

new ion kernel: https://github.com/mikeNG/android_kernel_semc_msm7x30/commits/cm-10.1-mutex-error

You can check the second post for more info.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] johnnyslt:
I'm seeing that pmem_adsp doesn't get allocated and it should:

[ 3.558837] pmem: pmem_setup: unable to register pmem driver(pmem_adsp) - zero size passed in!

What adreno libs are you using?

Also are you using patched gralloc with PMEM_ADSP support?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] johnny.tifosi:
hi [MENTION=3839575]mikeioannina[/MENTION]

I would like to help fix the fm radio in cm11. I am not a dev and I only have some basic C programming and github skills. If you think it is worth the time ( mine and yours), could you describe how to build the fm app for cm11 and where to look for bugs?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] kemoba:
I believe that the FM app is broken because there is no wrapper for the SEMC FM libs...
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mikeioannina:
You can pick this change: http://legacyxperia.us.to:8080/131 in order to build the TI FM stuff. It's only for cm10.1 currently but in my opinion it's the best version to work on FM, since we have the most complete code for msm7x30 & TI wl12xx in that version.

I'm afraid you won't manage to do anything since you need some knowledge of how android audio stuff works (I also haven't worked on audio stuff very much in the past and don't have much knowledge)

Anyway, the code is there for anyone who wants to try :)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Tof37:
Hello,

I'm porting 3.x kernel on an other xperia device (x10) and facing the same issue ... Did you managed to solve it ?

I'm using ion memory management and as johnnyslt wrote I got this line in log too :

pmem: pmem_setup: unable to register pmem driver(pmem_adsp) - zero size passed in!

I'll look with for this (that musn't be a big deal to allocate pmem_adsp with fitting lines in board ... let's see if this is what is causing the trouble.

If you didn't find the solution yet, I'll let you know if I find :)

Regards
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mikeioannina:
No, still having the problem. I have limited time these days so no much progress...

If you manage anything let me know :)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Tof37:
[MENTION=3839575]mikeioannina[/MENTION]

Hope it'll help ... you should have a look to your drivers/video/msm/logo.c and msm_fb.c and .h files

In the last 2 files the lines which are dealing with fb_msm_logo ...

I ported 3.4 video drivers in the 3.0.8 kernel I use and add the same issue.

I add this problem too with 3.0.8 drivers and solving the problem of fb_msm_logo did it.

If you disable fb_msm_logo in your config file but still have the issue this means you're mising lines specific for your device.

If 3.0.X kernel is already working on your device, try to make a diff with video drivers.

I'll take a look at your repo when I'll have a little time ;)

Regards
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mikeioannina:
Thanks for the hints,

hmm... I think I have tried without bootlogo with no luck, I will try again to be sure.

3.0.8 works fine on our devices, 3.4 works too but with 3.0.8 video drivers. When I try pure 3.4 it doesn't boot with the above error.

EDIT:

I tried disabling bootlogo with no change, still no display. :mad:

Making a diff of 3.0.8/3.4 drivers/video/msm is almost impossible since there are too many changes involved, I already tried it with no luck, spent hours and it didn't even compile.

I'm really sad with this situation, I'm working for 3 months on this kernel with the exact same issue. where the hell is the problem?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Tof37:
I see :) so I'm facing exactly the same problem ...

do you have this problem with your kernel with pmem ?

I didn't try with mine (only tried with the one where ion is enabled)

Even in the ion enabled version, pmem_adsp is allocated but still have the problem.

ps : It's been nearly 1 year I started to port 3.0.8 kernel on x10 ... I got nearly 6 months (including 2 months to not work on it) to try to solve display problem ;)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Tof37:
[MENTION=3839575]mikeioannina[/MENTION]

You should try this ...

in drivers/video/msm/mddi.c

in void pmdh_clk_enable() you've got

if (mddi_host_timer.function)
mddi_host_timer_service(0);

In my .32 video drivers this if is in static int mddi_resume ...

Try to get the the above function like this :

static int mddi_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
mddi_host_type host_idx = MDDI_HOST_PRIM;

if (!mddi_is_in_suspend)
return 0;

mddi_is_in_suspend = 0;

if (mddi_power_locked)
return 0;

pmdh_clk_enable();

mddi_host_reg_out(PAD_CTL, mddi_pad_ctrl);

[B]if (mddi_host_timer.function)
mddi_host_timer_service(0);[/B]

return 0;
}

The mddi_host_timer_service error in log dissapeared ... seems there are some problems is it stays in pmdh_clk_enable...
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mikeioannina:
that did nothing, still getting the same error...
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Tof37:
:(

Have to solve a |kgsl_mh_intrcallback| axi read error interrupt: error in my kernel and will take a more attentive look to 3.4 video drivers .

Stay tuned :)

btw if you ever have a solution for my problem :)

Thanks
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] kemoba:
I'm going to just throw this out, is it possible that you are building a kernel for CM10.1 and booting it on CM11 ?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] TakisBeskos:
i saw that you finally managed to boot 3.0.8 kernel using ion . what was causing that error ?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] koplax antiek:
god job
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Tof37:
Using Ion memory needs more memory than pmem. So I had to decrease smi to get the needed adsp pmem size.

But I'm not sure if x10 is not too much "hardware" limited to use nowdays kernel which needs more memory to work properly....
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] skaveelicious:
I don't want to be harsh but noise = random and to me that sounds like a pointer to a wrong address ... a crash ... pointer to oblivion?

I guess that was the first thing you checked anyway ... and ION probably doesn't work this way ...

Developing android this deep is just 10 levels above what I have done so far. My most complex project was developing an audio-transmitter soft- and hardware prototype for digital microphones, using a nxp lpc4330 microcontroller prototyping board. The project included setting up the i2s interface for reception, DMA Channels, some Signal processing and the Serial-GPIO as output for the data stream.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sven31415:
Hello together,

i am not experienced in Android development, but i am an experienced developer.

I just checked the log from Mike and there is a suspicious line at the beginning:

[ 3.003723] msm_ion_allocate: could not get memory for heap wb (id 10)

[ 3.010223] ION heap wb created

I guess a heap is not created there but i am not sure what wb heap is about and if it is important.

I checked kernel source and wb is the writeback heap. It is the last heap in the heap struct and fails to allocate.

static void __init reserve_ion_memory(void)

{

#if defined(CONFIG_ION_MSM) && defined(CONFIG_MSM_MULTIMEDIA_USE_ION)

msm7x30_reserve_table[MEMTYPE_EBI0].size += msm_ion_camera_size;

msm7x30_reserve_table[MEMTYPE_EBI0].size += MSM_ION_AUDIO_SIZE;

msm7x30_reserve_table[MEMTYPE_EBI0].size += MSM_ION_SF_SIZE;

msm7x30_reserve_table[MEMTYPE_EBI0].size += MSM_ION_WB_SIZE;

#endif

}

I don't know what it is used for.

My usual strategy would be: Get a kernel debugger running and check what is going wrong.

I guess running a kernel debugger is not that easy ?

I saw in the log that hardware breakpoints are reported. That means attaching a gdb must somehow be supported and debugging in flash is possible.

BR

Sven
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] chraso:
Hi mikeioannina,

I have provided a logcat for the touch problem while device in mtp mode and doing some read/write to sdcard.

http://pastebin.com/f22QcAgZ