yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bilybob:
I tried flashing - that didn't work either. I did:

fastboot flash openrecovery-twrp-2.6.3.3-m7.img

Same problem. Are you certain this should work?

Thanks
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] khandelwalsiddharth:
try erasing cache.

fastboot erase cache

fastboot flash recovery recovery.img

fastboot erase cache
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bilybob:
That seems to have worked.

Not sure if it was the cache erase or I believe I was missing the recovery from:

fastboot flash recovery recovery.img

I just had:

fastboot flash recovery.img

Anyway, I have re-flashed the SU pkg and all appears good now.

Thanks very much for the help from each of you.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] leesumm:
If I am not mistaken and read it wrong, SuperSu needs to be updated with the OTA 4.3 read this link http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...persu-update-to-v1-43-to-fix-the-100-cpu-bug/
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] momo-infos:
I have a xperia z1 I tried to flash 4.1 RomAur I made ​​a mistake I did not install LB-krabappel2548 [NUT] I installed directly Kernel and baseband .290 c6903 suddenly the phone fall directly death I searched the net I found that this problem is hard brik

I put my phone was the only load the LED flashes red and after a period it is not statabilse display I tried to put it in the PC to flash with flashtool but I have not succeeded because under load I leave for a long time still the same problem please help me because I could not stand this problem:confused:
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ruinkhan:
Get into waiting line man, there are at least 30 other helpless people with Bricked Z1's.

Btw, why Red?
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TagEHeuer:
Instead of flashing, have you tried using Sony PCCompanion to reset the whole phone?
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] momo-infos:
the problem that the phone can not start when I try and place it in the pc for flaher with flashtool it says nothing except red LED flashes I could not when I press power and Vol + it vibrates 3 ​​times but nothing to report changes nothing
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] momo-infos:
yes my friend i don't no why LED red flashes and I see no soltion for hard brick Xperia Z1 I contacted a few friends they told me that you would expect when the integration in the Box JITAG to repair the boot
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Meni30:
connect the phone to a wall charger > press and hold power & volume up for 10 or 15 seconds > let it charge for 3 hours > after 3 hours > press and hold power & volume up for 10 seconds

p.s u can write in black to red is for attention...
[Xperia Z1 General] epsix:
Sony Z1S or LG G Flex?
[Xperia Z1 General] tthaz777:
Z1S is T-Mobile version of Z1 (do not recommend a phone with carrier logo because it's loaded with T-Mobile bloatwares and less supported by XDA developers)

I purchased international factory unlocked Z1 (C6903) last month to use on T-Mobile 4G LTE. I'm very satisfied with my Z1. :good:
[Xperia Z1 General] kbadone:
C6903 as well ! You can grab it for $560 unlocked. Besides Z1s frame looks like its made out of plastic not aluminum
[Xperia Z1 General] nbell13:
C6902 Z1.
[Xperia Z1 General] Zerousen:
Neither of those, as I already have a C6906, just waiting for my contract with Sprint to expire in about a month. Otherwise, I'd get a Nexus 5.
[Xperia Z1 General] epsix:
T-Mobile logo don't bother me, bloat I can remove it myself. I want to purchase from T-Mobile corporate store so if there's anything wrong with It, Tmobile will ship me the phone overnights without having to ship my phone out. Oh did I mentioned T-Mobile WiFi calling? .:D

So guys which one would you likely to purchased? Flex or z1s?
[Xperia Z1 General] nbell13:
wifi calling is about the only benefit over the unlocked z1, imo. plastic instead of aluminum? bleh.
[Xperia Z1 General] epsix:
Oh come on bro,we're still in Z1 families don't hate.:D I've just watched z1s on YouTube for Tmobile it's identical to Z1 international.,I can't tell if the sides are plastic or not but I'm liking it so far. LG G Flex is too big, I think Z1S is mine mine mine.hehehe
[Xperia Z1 General] dallashigh:
The Z1S is a little bit cheaper and T-Mobile will actually give a hoot if you have issues with it. Unlocking/logo is not an issue—either we're set with T-Mobile or we know how to get it unlocked. Plastic sides are more comfortable and let's be real—most people are using a case anyway, so what's the difference?

I don't think development will be a problem because the internal hardware is most likely identical to the Z1. The only issue we might run into is getting root, but I'm sure it will be done.
[Xperia Z1 General] epsix:
This is my second GS4 o messed up the charging port on the first one. I called customer care, told them my problems and they ship me a new one without using my insurance cause its under warranty.:thumbup:
[Xperia Z1 General] nbell13:
Oh for those who don't already have one, yes, definitely get it. For those that got the unlocked global version (like me)... might as well keep it. :)
[HTC Butterfly] nick841:
Hi guys, surfing the net i found this versione of 4.4.2 stock-based ROM (Google Edition look), like a porting of the cyanogen's one.

This is the link...i can't test it because I have a x920d so if anyone wants to test this is the link:

Thread: bbs.mumayi.com/thread-3533336-1-1.html

Link to Download: pan.baidu.com/s/1qxPdN

And, finally, if anyone wanted to create a porting to the x920d...he make me :silly:
[HTC Butterfly] praveen7682:
You can give it a try and see if this works...just take a backup of your Rom...
[HTC Butterfly] nick841:
Yes, I'll try later...I think it works but with some issues, like the memory partitions!
[HTC Butterfly] praveen7682:
If it works then we can ask kairi to make a kernel...he will help us...he is been a great kernel developer for us...
[HTC Butterfly] nick841:
It gives me an error in execiting updater-binary, so I cannot complete the installation!
[HTC Butterfly] Bassie39:
I can try but first a want to have stock recovery before flash twrp, still no ota for 4.3 found for x920e European version to extract recovery from.
[HTC Butterfly] bluheart:
The ROM won't install on x920D and porting spoiled my things.

Wish kairi can port this ROM for butterfly, as I am not well versed with binaries.

Still trying! :D
[HTC Butterfly] doki_93:
this won't install on my x920e.

it says its for dlx
[HTC Butterfly] didov33:
if you giys can upload a clean (or not) backup of the original 4.3 firmware for the dlx_u x920e butterfly that works with tw backup wuld be very nice cause none of the once i found work for me
[HTC Butterfly] annex78:
A person on the German Android Forum managed to use Insertcoin 2.4.0 DLXUB1 for the X920E.

I did the exact same thing like he explained, but only with the newer Insertcoin rom 2.5.0, everything works and the rom is stable.

Now my X920E is running 4.4.2 Sense 6. :D
[HTC Butterfly] xunus:
There isn't time for 442 Sense 6. When there's 502 Sense 7 somewhere on the internet:p
[HTC Butterfly] annex78:
Installed 5.0.2 Sense 7, so far so good. Aroma installer is partly russian and chinese or japanese. During install settings all languages available. :D
[HTC Butterfly] alireza1994:
NEW Version

android 5 full work . x920d, x920e, dlx, butterfly j

https://yadi.sk/d/WGBQdLWVgJhv8

mirror

http://yun.baidu.com/wap/shareview?...ly&page=1&num=20&fsid=373134315374825&third=0
[HTC Butterfly] nemesis81:
Installed it on a X920E. Working perfect. Very smooth.

Very happy I found a suitable rom for the x920e. I thought I f*** up my phone due to x920D/x920E confusion. (phone says x920d but actually is a x920e)
[HTC Butterfly] fmkhan009:
I flashed this rom to my x920e. Upon rebooting the phone goes to recovery again and again. I wiped data, cache and dalvik cache but it didn't helped. Any help will be highly appreciated. :(
[HTC Butterfly] haisayaluqman:
how did you install it? i tried but it keeps rebooting to recovery...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] firesword14:
Hey guys, this has been bugging me for quiet a while, i've been flashing different roms and came to stay on omni rom because of it stability and great features, my friend who as well recently bought a nexus 5 showed me his antutu benchmark scores at about 27400 (stock and unrooted) so i checked mine out on omni rom and franco kernel, it was about 24300, well obviosuly after that i tried a couple of other roms with franco kernel, and got results of always above 28000 and specially in beergang at 33414.

Now i have never faced any lag or any kind of slowdown in omni rom and the battery is brilliant (16-30hrs depending on gaming time), but after flashing beergang it seems to be much more responsive and faster but battery is really bad.

Now my question is why a great rom such as omni has such a bad score? And should i really consider these scores or just be away with them?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
Because developers don't care about pointless "scores". They care about real world performance and stability.

-----------------------

Sent via tapatalk.

I do NOT reply to support queries over PM. Please keep support queries to the Q&A section, so that others may benefit
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eddiehk6:
The whole purpose of having a choice of custom roms is to find one which is right for your needs, and hopefully one which you enjoy using

If you are flashing them to find which one has the best score...then you're not actually using the rom...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] droid_<3er:
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but I think you ought to know that by now, Quadrant and Antutu are completely useless. I would shoot an analogy at you but I can't think of one that compares, because of how useless those benchmarks actually are.

If you're going to care about benchmark scores, then it's your loss...go with Beergang then and enjoy the battery life. There isn't really anything complicated to it. Personally, omni and droidkang do a great job of performance with good battery life.

If your friend is boasting about his Antutu scores like you say he is and making you question your own phone's performance, then I must say that your friend is but one with the knowledge and maturity of a five year old.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Hi,

The OP is just asking why there is low score, he has the right?

The replies are always and again the same... Here's my opinion about benches, but just mine.

That being said if you really want higher scores, flash this: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2537299.

I won't repeat that I already said in my very long post but it's right it's not the most important, if you're happy with the whole use of your phone then all is good, benches are a little thing to play with. It's not the main priority (it depends of your goal) and a "really great" rom can bench lower than a "bad" rom and vice versa :D

Low scores could be explained with a lot of factors like rom and kernel (some are a bit more "optimized" with different thermal management for the kernel and already some Dalvik and Bionic stuff for the rom), CPU settings like governors/governor settings), other tweaks, the flashable zip above with optimized Dalvik/Bionic libs which gives mainly higher scores in benches, and mainly the thermal throttling, you need to really let your phone cool down before a bench...

So the two things which will increase your score is the flashable zip above and take care of the thermal throttling.

:)
[Android Development on Bada] lisa2blonde:
the like... on the wave?

Currently running bada. thanks for you help :)

Lisa

xx
[Android Development on Bada] Silkmeister1:
Hi Lisa, welcome.

There is Froyo ported if you look at the very beginning pages of the threads in this sub forum.

If I were you, i'd head on to Volk204's Cm10.2 for wave.

It is dual boot bada with jellybean 4.2.2!

Best Silkmeister1
[Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro] vikasjangra:
Hi guys as topic say find whatever you want from right here

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2335530

Say thanks to respective devs and if you want than to me also.
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] omadre:
I tried to update my Defy+ MB526 at a newer version of Android (Jelly Bean or more... now it's running with the factory 2.3.6 ) but I have a problem with the installation of CM.

1) I rooted my device with Framaroot "Super SU" and checked wit "Root checker" and it is ok.

2) Then I stored in the SD the CM file.zip (before the 10.2 and after the 11) and the Gapps.zip.

3) I installed the SndinitDefy_2.3.apk

4) I ran the recovery mode, wiped factory/data, wiped cache partition, wiped Dalvik cache

5) Then install zip from SD card, but the file "cm-11-20131229-nightly-mb526.zip" and also the "cm-10.2-20131020-nightly-mb526.zip" aborted the installation with "error status (0)".

I dont' know why.

Please tell me if the procedure I've done is correct. Otherwise write me the correct steps. Thank you. :good:

Ps: system version: 45.0.2310.mb526.retail.en.de

build n°: 4.5.1-134_dfp-231
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hotdog125:
Flash this - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=48501247, then reboot and go to recovery again. Then flash CM.
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] omadre:
Thank you Hotdog.

I tried with flash the Sndinit and after, by the custom recovery, I've flashed the Twrp. After I've started the Twrp recovery and flashed the CM11. It seemed ok but when I rebooted the device to install the Gapps, it has gone in infinity loop.

After that, i made a mistake because i did a completely reset of the device (the total wipe) and after I've reeboted the Defy and it bricked!!!

But with the guide in this forum I un-bricked it (It isn't difficult, it's easy) and then I tried, by the same previous way, to install the CM10.

With the CM10 it works awesome (4.1.2) and the gapps didn't create any problem!

Thank you again and many thanks to all people that everyday helps each other in this forum (especially non-expertised like me!)

:good::good::good::good::good::good::good:
[HTC Droid DNA] curryinaninstant:
Hey! I want to reset my phone to factory settings including the internal SD card. Anyone know how to do this? I'm currently rooted and running NOS's Sense 5, 4.1 ROM.

Thanks!
[HTC Droid DNA] t1gartist:
1 turn phone off

2 press and hold power and volume down

3 phone turns on into bootloader

4 volume down until factory rest is highlighted

5 press power button and wait
[Windows Mobile Development and Hacking General] ryhor:
Hi!

Could someone give me point about CSD GSM communication?

What is done:

I have connected 2 Qtek S100 through data-call:

- use TAPI - get “connected”

- take handle to COMM

- init COMM: 9600/ e.t.

- successfully transfer data

But several strange things I have:

1.	average transfer rate – channel capacity - for transparent mode (S100 allows to manipulate transparent/non-transparent mode) is 6.4k bit/sec. – and this is write to COMM. speed! i.e. transferring side shows this speed by simple WriteFile() operation for chunk of data for example 64k bytes. Some times I receive corrupted data – but it’s ok for me. – transfer rate is strange!

2.	average transfer rate for non-transparent mode is 8.8k bit/sec.- some times I see dropped series of bytes and equation: received + dropped == transferred is correct – so all is ok and speed is ok too ~1100 data bytes per sec +1 for stop-bits and +start-bit(? – not sure).

3.	_most_ interesting for me – after some number of errors the connection is dropped – I achieve Line IDLE state.

So – most interesting for me is 3. – I don’t wanna lost connection – I am agree to have some errors in communication – but I don’t want to make call again.

As I understand construction (coarsely) is

COMM->RIL

So does it mean I have to go inside RIL to set something to preserve “connection state”?

And same for transparent mode – does it something inside RIL to set for “improving” channel capacity from 6.4k close to expected 9.6k bits/sec?

Here is my DCB settings

PortDCB.BaudRate = CBR_9600;	// Current baud
PortDCB.ByteSize = 8;	// Number of bits/byte, 4-8
PortDCB.Parity = NOPARITY;	// Parity odd,even,mark,space
PortDCB.fBinary = TRUE;	// Binary mode; no EOF check
PortDCB.fParity = FALSE;	// No parity checking
PortDCB.fOutxCtsFlow = FALSE;	// CTS output flow control
PortDCB.fOutxDsrFlow = FALSE;	// No DSR output flow control
PortDCB.fDtrControl = DTR_CONTROL_ENABLE; //DTR output ON
PortDCB.fRtsControl = RTS_CONTROL_ENABLE; //RTS_CONTROL_HANDSHAKE;
PortDCB.fDsrSensitivity = FALSE;	// DSR sensitivity
PortDCB.fTXContinueOnXoff = TRUE;	// XOFF continues Tx
PortDCB.fOutX = FALSE;	// No XON/XOFF out flow control
PortDCB.fInX = FALSE;	// No XON/XOFF in flow control
PortDCB.fErrorChar = FALSE;	// Disable error replacement
PortDCB.fNull = FALSE;	// Disable null stripping
PortDCB.fAbortOnError = FALSE;	// Do not abort reads/writes on error
PortDCB.StopBits = ONESTOPBIT;	// 0,1,2 = 1, 1.5, 2

how to stay connected? :)

Thanks for any advice.
[Windows Mobile Development and Hacking General] OdeeanRDeathshead:
a guess.....

Try transferring less data per write. Also you probably do not need to alter any of the port settings. They normally work fine the way they are. You would still need to set com time outs for the read/write opperation.

As an experiment just omit all your port settings and try transfering 1 byte at a time. If it still drops out it could be your quality of service.
[Windows Mobile Development and Hacking General] ryhor:
yes - use smaller portion may help me.

but I think it just masks effect of line drop - interest is: what a reason to line-drop and what parameters influences on it?

some level of error per some period of time - or what?

thanks anyway.
[Moto G Themes and Apps] fabiobatera:
Apk fully functional in JB and KK versions.

Functional in Odex roms and Deodex

Put this on /system/app/ (JB) or /system/priv-app/ (KK) and change permissions to rw-r--r-- (644)

Ps. Rename apks Odex Mms.apk.bak and Mms.odex.bak of system ;)

Working on 4.4.2

working on 4.3. Tested by me.

Download:

http://www.mediafire.com/download/bdjizxha15hxl20/Mms.rar
[Moto G Themes and Apps] mangusmeister:
Any chance of a better explanation on how to install? there is only one apk in the zip so do u rename the odex file that's in the phone already and copy the apk you provided over the stock apk and rename that too?
[Moto G Themes and Apps] Astroke67:
Nice idea!the root is required?:)

Inviato dal mio XT1032 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Moto G Themes and Apps] mrcorey:
Root is required to write install to the system partition. So, yes

Sent from my Moto G
[Moto G Themes and Apps] zeropants:
I followed the directions and restarted. It shows as a program, but the default settings don't show it as a default mms option and when I tried to use it to send a message it force closed.
[HTC One S] djiock:
Hello all !

I have an issue after trying to change ROM : I had "icon stretching" issue with Source, something apparently no one had seen before. I wanted to switch to Maximus, so I flashed it apparently with no problems. But then the phone only booted to Recovery (TWRP)...

So I tried to flash firmware again, the one given in tuto for Maximus but same problem.

And this is when it got tricky, not only I couldn't boot to Android, but I couldn't mount USB either, the option just disappeared ! Along with issue to mount "/cache" apparently. I tried factory reset, then full wipe, no result.

I tried a more recent version of TWRP than the one given with Maximus' tutorial, with it I have the option to mount USB but only for a 48 MB space ! Again, factory reset and full wipe don't help.

I'm not too worried since I can access bootloader and Recovery fine but I feel out of options... I flashed 2.16 firmware like a dozen times (is it any point in doing that ?), I wonder just how I can get a recovery that can mount USB, or a stock ROM to start fresh.

Anybody to help me ? Thanks in advance !
[HTC One S] twist3d0n3:
stick on TWRP 2.3.3.0 which (iirc) is the last one that allows you to mount storage. slap another rom across, flash, fastboot boot.img, get the rom up and running and then consider changing recoveries.
[HTC One S] djiock:
Thanks for your reply

I flashed this version but I can only mount a 48MB storage :(. I didn't reflash the firmware, should I downgrade to 2.15 ?
[HTC One S] twist3d0n3:
i've got no experience with 2.16 firmware so i can't really help you as far as it goes with the best recovery on that... all i can say is the last version of TWRP that allows sd mount is 2.3.3.0. have you tried the latest CWM that works with kitkat roms? that might be worth a shot.
[HTC One S] ka_55:
Maybe you should use recovery from maximus thread, it can be specialized for hboot 2.16. AFAIK 2.16 hboot has a different partition system, that could be the problem. Try to wipe your sd with op recomended recovery. You should flash the firmware twice by the way(second one when got the error), i think you already know that
[HTC One S] foxtrot_lima:
Look at this thread, might help you:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2584297

---------- Post added at 03:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:11 PM ----------

I can mount sdcard with TWRP 2.6.3.0 for hboot 2.15 from this thread: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2528113
[HTC One S] djiock:
YYYYYEEEEEESSSS !

Finally ! That was the right way to do it, downgrade to Hboot 2.15 with help of http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2322755 but the recovery wasn't booting, just reflashing TWRP offered in http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2528113 did the trick.

And then I was able to mount my SD card and follow the steps to flash Maximus.

What a relief. Thank you all for your help ! I'm just surprised not many people seem to have had the same issue... But maybe they manage to resolve it by themselves ! ;)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] desertopal:
I have edited a file in /efs/carrier/HiddenMenu "OFF" changed to "ON" all in capital letters This survives a reboot

I opened up my dialer and dialed *#7284# clicked the button at the bottom titled " Qualcomm USB Settings" select MTP or MTP+ADB. Now without rebooting when I connect to the computer it connects as a MTP device, great this is what I want BUT when I reboot it reverts back to Connected as an Installer. Yes I can wait 10 or so seconds and it will change to MTP device or drag the notification down and change it manually but what fun is that...

I'm on Sophisticated 2.5 ROM
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Detroit Amerson:
I am on Sophisticated 2.5 at does the same. My wifes Note 2 is bone stock very been root or anything and it also does it. Thats just the way 4.3 is, not a problem with 2.5. I have not found a flash or any mod to change it, but I would also like it to stay the MTP
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] coffeedave:
MTP

I experienced this "delay" as well with Scott's ROM JB4.1, seems to be the norm?
[Galaxy Note 8.0 (Tablet) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooti] jlongrc:
My note 8.0 is having an issue where it does not hold its connection to Wi-Fi for more than a few minutes, at most, and often does more than that. It honestly does not affect performance a great deal, that I can notice at least, but I do think it drains the battery much more quickly and the constant alerts are quite distracting and get in the way of my handwriting input.

The common wisdom seems to be to have Wi-Fi always on, but that didn't change the behavior whatsoever.

I did not notice this behavior until I finished my vacation and came back to my work where we have a much more complex network than my parent's house. Here, there are numerous routers throughout the office complex to ensure total Wi-Fi coverage. They use 802.1x authentication. I'm wondering if the device is basically "choosing" a new router each time it disconnects. My desk is about 10 feet from a router, so I know signal strength is not the problem.

I just can't figure out what else to do or try to do. This is a Wi-Fi-only model running Android 4.2.2 as updated OTA from Samsung. Unrooted, locked bootloader.