yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nexusbandit:
i was able to fix the glitches by putting the build prop file from the 21 build into the 22 build and reflashing the 22 build only..i didn't clean anything..i did however change all the 21"s in the prop file to 22 if I had a way to upload it I would..i can also comfirm the screen recorder works but you have to set it to a video size of 720x120 with a bitrate of 1 mb/s to work flawlessly..you may be able to change the bitrate..i noticed in the build prop that it was set at for 720x1280..youll need to change this under display settings from the default 1080x1920 maybe this will help Justin with a fix ? now I have no glitches and screen recorder is working but the google bar still don't have the ok google listed on it without clicking on it..i may play with the rom more and send Justin my findings on everything and maybe this will help him with the next release..the only flaw that I have found as of right now is the toolbar not having ok google..

update ok google works...its just not wrote on the toolbar but when you say ok google it does what it should
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] vzihome:
Build prop edit fixes issues
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nexusbandit:
I tried the build prop edit listed on the link previously posted but it didn't work..I still had the glitches the 22 update also resolved the issues I had trying to download my games from Google play..I couldn't download candy crush and several other games with 21 as Google play said they weren't compatible with my os
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] burstlam:
here is a beta version of stock kernel

http://www.sendspace.com/file/5jtej7

rework base on bk12

-more governors (intellidemand from faux!)

- update BFQ scheduler to V6

- update ZRAM using LZ4 compression

- hotplug fix port back from 3.5

I forgot to disable 180mhz min freq option in config menu

it is recommended to set the min freq to 350 in performance settings in order to retain stability.

Fellow please test it (especially for stability and hotplug issue) and feedback freely.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] vzihome:
[MENTION=1922147]burstlam[/MENTION] downloading/flashing now... are you going to update t+ ROM with build prop edit to fix graphic glitch? Meantime I'll stick with 22build. Also is there a way we can incorporate carbon ROM's color combo, its the best i have seen from all ROMs. Also the adjustment for color that is built in is in percentages (unusual) as it's hard to match with mostly common used setting that use actual values. Also pocket mode doesn't work. Just reporting and awesome work thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nexusbandit:
I am going to nandroid and then flash this then post my findings later today..since I swapped the build prop files from the 21 to the 22 build and changed all the 21 numbers to 22, I haven't had one problem at all!! I really hate to change what isn't broke..where is the pocket mode ? Its the only thing I haven't tested..everything else works flawlessly so far

---------- Post added at 10:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:34 AM ----------

I do have one question? What is chamber of secretes under developer options?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] vzihome:
[MENTION=1922147]burstlam[/MENTION] no go on clean install wouldn't go past provisioning. Tried several times and clearing chache and dalvick helped.

Pocket mode is under adaptive display

---------- Post added at 10:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:53 AM ----------

What is the chamber of secrets curious also...phone always running hot
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nexusbandit:
You were right that pocket mode does not work.I tried all the settings and it never did work..if I knew which ROM it came from I may be able to compare a few things and get it going.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] vzihome:
Carbon ROM but it is different. Carbon has its own pocket mode that is not tied with adaptive settings but works awesome only thing I miss from it though.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] burstlam:
Stock Kernel bk13 Beta 2 :

Revert BFQ V6

Fix PGM support

Fix Reboot issue

http://www.sendspace.com/file/kub0v1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] vzihome:
That was quick! Awesome thanks for your dedication!

---------- Post added at 04:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:49 PM ----------

[MENTION=1922147]burstlam[/MENTION] link is for your desktop :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nexusbandit:
says the file is not available did you remove it?

sorry didn't see the updated beta 2 until after i already posted this..flashing now
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] burstlam:
Stock Kernel bk13 Beta 3 :

add back PVR Governor

add back color control ability

Update Wireless to Update to version 1.88.45

Touch to Wake Version:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/keab8c

PGM Version:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/lmtekg
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] vzihome:
What is the difference on pgm and touch to wake?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nexusbandit:
I am curious also.without knowing I really don't know which to flash?touch to wake is self explaining but what's pgm and does it not support the touch to wake feature? I have also been having browser freezing issues and had to do a battery pull twice now since the beta 2 kernel flash..other than that and pocket mode not working my phone has been doing pretty good..battery drain also jumped to 6% an hour at just idle time from the 4% it was using with the original kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JohnCorleone:
PGM is an app that allows great swipe and touch features when the modules are added to the kernel. I swipe right to left across my nav bar buttons to turn off screen, swipe left to right across them to wake and also choose double tap anywhere on the screen to wake. It has a few other options as well and works great. Its probably still available in Play Store but its now no longer being updated and its renamed "Touch Control" I believe for newer Nexus devices.

I imagine touch to wake alone just allows the option of waking the screen by tapping it but I don't know what it's controlled or adjusted with. PGM is great though

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Gray Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JohnCorleone:
Oh I forgot to mention that Lean kernel has been my favorite kernel all long even when I had all of the other well known kernel options available. Its really solid. I really like the 230 min frequency but I think its now either 180 or 350 MHz.

For those of you who don't know, you can flash a zip called "Leantweaks" that allows you to set everything to your liking in a terminal emulator and it has lots of features as well as eliminating the need for an app to set things and my color, sound, frequency and extra tweaks all set on boot.

I would really like to see one more 230 min frequency build if at all possible.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Gray Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] myrmidon84:
For some reason my Gnex loves the lean kernels. I have the best results and best battery life with them.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] orangecream:
Just noticed that WiFi display is no longer working in the 2/21 build. Can't seem to connect at the last stage. The work in the 1/17 build.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nexusbandit:
WIFI is ok in build 22 I am curious if there will be a rom update soon or should I start looking into other roms?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] orangecream:
WiFi or WiFi display (ie. miracasting)? I'm having trouble with WiFi display in the 2/21 build, but normal WiFi works yes.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mkuehl06:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2666949

New thread same rom different dev
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JohnCorleone:
Yeah up until KitKat I ran 230 min and 920 max but with the Leantweaks and file system speed up, etc it felt just as fast and I was regularly getting 4-5 hours of screen time and 24 hours off the charger but I always recharge before I go to sleep to monitor the idle battery drain so it was more like 5 hours screen time with 17-19 hours use. I need to follow the new thread and see if any new builds are up because this has been 99% perfect for me. Only Screen record didn't work. Before I wiped my phone I had probably 20 Lean kernels and maybe 3 each of the other top kernels. I was always recommending Lean though

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Gray Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vja4Him:
I was excited to receive the 64 GB Micro SDHC card (Samsung microSDXC UHS-I Card Pro) for my Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Now very disappointed ... I put the card in my iBook G4, but it would not read it. Option to Eject or Format, so I tried formatting Mac OS. Phone would NOT read card. Then formatted DOS. Phone still will not read card.

Last, my Note 3 formatted the card, but now my Mac will not read the card!!! The only way that I can load files onto the card is from my iBook. ALL, yes every single one, of my other SD and SDHC cards are readable with my Samsung Galaxy Note 3, so I can load files onto the phone.

Is there a Hidden Secret to getting this card to work with my Samsung Galaxy Note 3, or is the card simply defective?

-- Jim ....
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lorenzo.themax92:
I think that the problem is mac OS and not the note3, because it read correctly the content of micro sdhc card.

What version of Mac osx do you have ?

Have you tried to view the micro SD in a windows o.s.?

Inviato dal mio LG-D802 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vja4Him:
Just got off the phone with Samsung Tech Support. They told me the Note 3 is not compatible with Class 10 SD Cards. So I will need to buy a Class 6 card instead.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chkenwing:
So let me get this straight:

1, You placed card in your G4, but does not read and only gives you the option to Eject or Format.

2, You formatted the card in Mac OS (Extended) (I assume from what you're saying) which didn't work and the phone was still unable to read it.

3. You tried the DOS format, the phone will still not read the card.

4. You formatted the card in your phone but the Mac doesn't read it.

I noticed you formatted the card in Mac OS (Extended) format, which is Mac's own file format. Have you tried formatting in FAT32? That's usually the most chosen file format for SD cards. The only limitation is the 4GB file limit.

---------- Post added at 03:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:04 AM ----------

They have no clue what they're talking about. I've seen many people saying they're running class 10 cards flawlessly. And with such a relatively new device, not supporting class 10 would be an absolute idiotic move.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pete4k:
That is total nonsense, class 6 card will have a problem record even HD video, not to mention 4k video, I have 32 GB class 10card and works fine, I saw many people using fastest cards available without a problem, in other words Note 3 works fine with class 10 cards. You already have an answer, your problem is your proprietary MAC and since Apple's iphones and ipods don't support SD card, you may be up the creek without a paddle. I wonder if your Note 3 didn't format the card as ExFat, it was recommended to me, since it does support over 4GB file limit and it works better in large cards. I'm sure you could transfer files using Apple's approved way, using Cloud and maybe itunes.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NOZX:
When samsung say class 10 is not supported is it class 10 64gb not supported maybe. Considering my 32gb class 10 works a treat
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] basdaniel:
Oh! I must have a unique note 3 then as I have a 64gb class 10 Samsung micro sd card running quite well on my phone for quite some time now.

Whoever told you that the Note 3 cannot read class 10 cards is surely fast asleep where the note 3 is concerned.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ultramag69:
I use an adaptor with a 128Gb sd card... Never had a problem...

The Samsung tech is just being a D!ck... I bet if you called again and got another tech you'd end up with another answer... Bl00dy ridiculous saying a high end latest tech flagship phone can't support a class 10 card....

Might not have been listening though and thought you said Galaxy S 3 though that also supports the class 10 card....
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xclub_101:
Questions should go to the Questions forum!

The card might still be defective but I seriously doubt that (since the Note 3 can format it just fine; also there are about a million users of 64GB cards on Samsung phones and those tend to work OK).

Your problem (other than not really reading stuff on your own - for instance you missed on how Questions should NOT go in General forum) seems to be more with using a pretty closed ecosystem (Apple) and some not very fresh versions of it :rolleyes:

The short version is that SD cards over 32GB have as standard format exFAT (a format that for instance has the large advantage over FAT32 that can use files bigger than 2 GB). That format is not well supported on older OS versions - which explains why you can't see it on your PCs.

More reading on the subject and how to achieve better compatibility (at the expense of no longer being able to have files over 2GB):

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2041679
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ShadowLea:
How about you find yourself a Windows or Linux pc and format it to FAT32 or EXFAT there...

Mac OS. Tsk. There's your problem.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zadigre:
Your main problem is your mac G4... It probably has no support for extfat (file system used by default on a 64GB card)... And probably no correct support for sdxc cards.

I've used my Samsung pro card in my 2011 MacBook pro and note 3 without any problem for a few weeks now.

Sent from my SM-N900 with Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dcracks:
Its yr mac...I had no issues at all with my class 10 64g in my note 3...readable on my pc as well...

Teleported from my SM-N9005 from the Enterprise
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] grud1e:
thats a bit of a generalization mac os is and isn't his problem it is because he is using a very old version on his g4 mac however as most people will not have that version any modern version of mac os from 10.6 onwards will work and allow formatting in exfat

also to all the other posters who call mac os a closed ecosystem and generally dismiss out of hand mac os where is it anymore closed than microsoft systems ??

i can and do run both os on a cpl of mac pros (mac/win) and a cpl of intel pcs (win/mac) .......my os of choice however is mac

to transfer files on mac os use android file transfer ...however this will not work on non intel macs
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pete4k:
Well, you can run Windows on your Mac, no Windows computer can run Mac OS and it's not for any particular technical reason, but because it's locked to hardware, so yeah, Windows is open and mac is locked OS, no matter how you look at it. And generalization or not HIS MAC IS THE PROBLEM, not Note3, regardless of the reason.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jszhang:
I am trying to flash my Galaxy note 2 (AT&T I-317). I can get into recovery mode but when flashing the rom it will always be unsuccessful and showing infomation as "your device is 't03g' and the rom you flashed is not compatible" From the CM website, seems the correct name of my device is 't0lteatt'. I have no idea why my device is detected as 't03g' and hoping anyone knows how to solve this problem.

My previous ROM is MyMIUI ROM based on android 4.1. Thanks in advance!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Zmeyer:
Hello Community,

My Uncle dropped his phone yesterday into a small puddle, Initially the screen would power on and work perfectly except the screen would not respond to any touches, after leaving it in rice over night and all day the screen is now responding to touch(I have even done tests drawing perfect lines and swype keyboard works perfect) But every couple of minutes the phone starts opening radom apps and the touchscreen starts freaking out(I enabled the Show touches option in the developer menu and you can see the touches flying all across the screen)

Please let me know if anybody has seen this before or this a problem with the digitizer from the Fall VS Water damage Thanks :D:D
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] gepol:
Just upgraded to the new rtom, and now it's impossible to go back to my 1.6.7.1.

HELPPP!!!!! ...would be much appreciated :)
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] DrBig74:
I understand your trouble.

First, download aWizard from the ftp site:

ftp://xda:xda@ftp.xda-developers.com/Wizard/Misc/aWizard-V1_3beta2.zip

From within aWizard, enable RAPI, then run CID Unlock to be safe.

Then download this file:

ftp://xda:xda@ftp.xda-developers.co...TOM__RUU_Wizard_1050412_WWE_101_11210_WWE.exe

Run the program and it will downgrade your phone to the following:

ipl and spl: 1.01

gsm: 1.12.10

rom: 1.05.04.12

Once installed you can opt out of the extended rom by reseting after the initial setup. Use the wizard unlocking tool and soft reset. You can then delete and write new files to the extended rom if you like.

This rom works well if you do not need pushmail or run stereo bluetooth. At this point you may upgrade the rom and radio if you like.

Please be aware that the 2.07 radio rom found in the newer os rom does not succesfully mate with a 1.x os rom. I hope this helps.

Best,

DrBig74
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] lvlolvlo:
http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=44116

Just use the nba file for the ROM image you wnat to downgrade to.....
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] gepol:
Produced this error , what can I do?

CopyFileToTFFS(cidunlocked.bin:0, 0, 00010000)

ERROR: ITWriteDisk - An internal error occurred.

Please help?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] gepol:
Where do I find the .nba file?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] meschle:
hi gepol I downgraded my qtek 9100 after trying test rom use wizard ulocker but choose super cid option. the 1.6.7.1 rom will install then. out of interest why don't you like new rom. I changed back coz sound quality was worse. :)
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] gepol:
Hi,

Even worse than it already is? Jeezus... :?

I cannot use because my ROM is a Greek one, and the new one lacks everything Greek until the Greek guys translate it by the end of the month. I was stupid enough to want to test it, without checking about downgrading first.

But I finally made it :)
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] lvlolvlo:
the nba file could potentially be found on the ftp site...though i'm not sure...

I have the T-Mobile MDA (US) so before I did any editing I backed up the rom, splash, etc... using aWizard which generated the nba files for the ROM, Radio, splash, etc...
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] gepol:
Thanks :)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] pirateer888:
flashed my daughter s2 1747m telus with what i thought was 4.3 for telus, sadly it was 4.3 telcel mexico any ideas on how to recover
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] codemonkey98:
If you are able to access download mode, you could flash stock by ODIN.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] pirateer888:
sorry bout that it is a s3 1747m. tried to redflash 4.3 telus but always fail
[Windows 8 General] redfusion87:
I love this tablet except I didn't realize it is running 32-bit win8.1 which sucks. Anyone know if there is a way I can get Win 8.1 64-bit on it?
[Windows 8 General] mustbepbs:
Why do you think 32 bit sucks?
[Windows 8 General] mcosmin222:
Maybe he needs features that are supported on 64 bit systems.

OP, technically speaking, intel atom supports 64 bit architecture, however, since you only have 2 GB of RAM, performance will be severely crippled.

There is no point in using a 64 bit system with less than 4 GB of RAM.
[Windows 8 General] GoodDayToDie:
That's not entirely true. First of all, "severely crippled" is quite an overstatement; you'll lose a few percent CPU efficiency while executing 32-bit programs, and cache coherency will suffer a bit, but the impact is barely noticeable and has nothing to do with RAM size (that is, you'll take the same hit for running 32-bit code on a 64-bit OS whether you have 2GB or 20GB). Program binaries (64-bit ones, that is) are usually larger, which consumes both more storage and more RAM once they're loaded, but they also get to use the extra registers and instructions (including native 64-bit integer math) that are available to 64-bit-aware programs, which can actually make them more efficient than their 32-bit counterparts in some cases. In other cases, they will be very slightly slower (largely due to cache coherency loss from the large pointer values) but the difference is pretty small.

Then, there's security. 64-bit programs can use high-entropy ASLR, which makes ASLR *vastly* more effective (32-bit OSes typically use only 8 or 12 bits of entropy for ASLR, which is good but still permits brute-forcing on repeatable attacks, and the occasional lucky hit in any case; HE-ASLR uses enough entropy that you could exploit every PC on the planet and still have a fair chance of missing every time). 32-bit programs have such small heaps that a heap-spraying attack (writing a NOP-sled into the payload instructions, so that if you pivot the instruction pointer onto the heap you will "slide down" to the payload) is practical, typically taking less than a second; on a 64-bit process, even if you could commit enough virtual memory (you can't; no existing PC can) it would take *years* to spray it all.

Finally, a nitpick about setting the threshold at 4GB for where 64-bit is needed instead of 32-bit. Video memory is typically mapped into the kernel address space, as are the I/O buffers for other drivers. In the old days, this was no big deal; a PC could easily afford to give up even a gig or so of kernel address space (assuming you weren't trying to assign more than 2GB to user-mode per-process allocation) and as long as you didn't have more than 3GB of physical memory, the memory manager could still address the rest of it. These days, even cheapo GPUs sometimes have more memory than that, and even a merely decent graphics card will have so much VRAM that a 32-bit system couldn't address all of it using the default 2GB user / 2GB kernel split. This isn't really a problem for embedded graphics, but anybody using 32-bit with a modern discrete GPU is nuts.
[Windows 8 General] Anonymously_Unknown:
Yes, however DELL has not released any 64-bit drivers for the touchscreen or any other component. You would need to install this with the device connected to a powered USB hub connected to a keyboard and mouse with a optical drive/flash drive with a bootable installation. Remember the touchscreen will not work during the installation process. Migrating to 64-bit on THIS particular tablet isn't worth the stress that you seek in my opinion. I went this route by turning off secure boot in the BIOS, but after doing a clean install, I found it wasn't worth it other than being able to use the "full" 32GB without the recovery partition and other junk. You will have to do a Windows update to get the generic drivers. Windows will load the integrated graphics and the WiFi natively, but it still isn't worth the hassle. Luckily, I had created a recovery flash drive and restored from that.