yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] overjoy71:
The black spots on the display?? You should get it fix, sounds like it is a problem with the screen. The only issue is that you seem to have voided your warranty as the Knox flag has been triggered. So the warranty is voided. You can try with some story for Samsung to replace it and see how you go.

If you are not going to replace it, you can remove Knox and flash DN3

---------- Post added at 12:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 PM ----------

Try Greenify and Bootmanager to help with battery.

Also download BetterBatteryStats or Wakelock to see what is keeping your phone awake.

If you are using Devil, download trickster mod or Devil Tool and change the CPU Governor to zzmoove.

You can also change the Multicore Power Saving to 2
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] character:
I tried viper and decrease then increase the volume I still find the volume is low... Just updating
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] erwinsie:
sorry just curious your signature says n7000, did you use the correct ROM? also this main thread is mostly for n7100 n7105
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] antique_sonic:
I use devil manager and viper4android. All just well. Sound did increase as expected. :)

Sent from N7105, powered by DittoNote3 v.3.2 with Devil 2.3.2
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] shingers5:
As blackspot on screen is a hardware issue not software related I'd take it back to get fixed. I'd reset the flash counter using triangle away then flash stock ROM via odin . the Knox void flag will remain and Samsung won't do any software repairs but hardware is different. Take it back as this is a hardware fault and Knox shouldn't have any effect on that. As far as I know black spot on screen cannot be caused by any software :)
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] character:
[MENTION=1963893]antique_sonic[/MENTION]

Can help how you do your setup
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] antique_sonic:
No special setting. I only play with the xtraloud setting under phone speaker. That's all. And can feel the effect.

I install the cortex a9 driver as well... if that's make a different. :)

Sent from SM-N9005 with xda-app
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] donylandes:
I've tried to change modem and kernel , and all is running great ; the rom Ditto seems more smooth and fast .

Kernel from AGNi pureSTOCK N7105 (based on SAMSUNG OSRC JB Update 2 sources [MK9] ) Thanks to psndna88 :

PSN_pureSTOCK-v3.6_N7105_4.3_OC-signed.zip ==> SELINUX STATUS: PERMISSIVE

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2602053

and modem :

Modem MK9 ( thanks to Maw2607 ) :

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2588787
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] antique_sonic:
Great... additional 1 more kernel for us :)

Sent from N7105, powered by DittoNote3 v.3.2 with Devil 2.3.2
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] erwinsie:
sorry but for the modem, is this will affect the phone signal receptions, 3G internet signals, etc? i mean im in australia, will this modem compatible with my phone provider?

also since some of us are using old 4.1 bootloader and have no WIFI with DN3 - therefore we need to use devil kernel.

will this new kernel give us WIFI?
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] micromouse:
[MENTION=1963893]antique_sonic[/MENTION]

Is your loudest volume at highest of the volume bar???

Because when i set it to full bar, i get very soft volume...

I really love this rom because really battery saving because i call alot so volume is very important to me.

Cheers
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] antique_sonic:
Before I use V4A yes, I need to set to full, and still soft.

But now, with 60-70%, already can hear very clear nd loud enough for me.

:)
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] overjoy71:
I just had a look. The ZIP file only has modem file, so it should leave your CSC untouched.

I just flash and it is working, though not sure if it is better than the normal one I use.

The AGNi kernel is smooth. I just flash it and it seems to be smoother and snappier than devil and it is seems to be more stock.

I flashed the SELinux-Free version. Has someone tried the other version?
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] greyhoundz16:
Hey guys will this work on a N7105 currently on stock 4.3 rooted? i have been reading all night looking for ways to have those note 3 features for this device.
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] :
Yes. You won't need the devil kernel for wifi while you have 4.3 bootloader
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] antique_sonic:
btw...

This AGNI kernel, work with boefla only ? V4A not supported ?

Do I need to uninstall the v4a first?

:)
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] overjoy71:
I think it is working. ...

Sent from XDA-powered N7105
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] thomast:
I just install DN3.1 yesterday on my N7105 with 4.1 bootloader. I did a full wipe in TWRP and install the ROM. Then install Devil kernel. Everything goes well so far. However, the device cannot scan wifi SSID. I can connect to Wifi but need to manually type in SSID in wifi setting page. Anyone experience this and how to fix?

Thanks in advance!
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] wikings1:
I have The same set up whit Latest devil and skan works fine

From my daycruiser
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] donylandes:
You're right , about the modem it's particularly for France and Europe ;)

I'm using 4.3 bootloader , so Wifi is running well !

After 24h , the rom is smoother , and the battery drain is not too fast !
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] antique_sonic:
I am now on AGNi SELinux permissive OC version.

*) Wifi is working well.

*) still using viper4android

*) test the audio setting also from agni control app, with speaker setting adjust to 60%. But too loud, now put back into default :p

*) 2hrs up and running still fine. Battery will see tomorrow.

:)

Sent from N7105, powered by DittoNote3 v.3.2 with AGNi PSN purestock v3.6 OC
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] donylandes:
Thanks for your comment , it could help a lot of people there ;)
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] SINGAPOREAN:
Hi [MENTION=1065837]donylandes[/MENTION]

Wonderful find!!

Just wondering, do I need to flash modem too? or can i just flash the kernel without changing modem? currently my "About Device" shows Baseband version = N7105DXDLL1

Thanks!
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] donylandes:
Hi back , you don't need to flash the modem ; it's the kernel to flash and you are going to improve the Ditto Note3 ;):good:
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] leebag:
Anyone else notice snote fails to update?
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] Senyaka:
Apparently you need to update using the stock kernel, so basically use 4g to get the update and install it. However, I've done that and it still hasn't updated. I'm hoping they pull out a full release like they did with N7100 version. I've also tried updating with Agni Kernel as well, and no luck.
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] leebag:
No luck on a fix by the looks?
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] micromouse:
Do you have the problem of "funny" volume bar of loudest sound not at the highest point?
[Galaxy Note II N7105 Android Development] Senyaka:
I've been trawling the AT&T Forums and doesn't look like it. Just got to be patient. That said, 3.1.1 is pretty damn solid, so I'm in no way complaining at all.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] kennyo112:
I should mention, I really dislike cases and most screen protectors in general. When I received my Nexus 5, I wanted to add some protection, however I did not want to put a case as I love the way the phone feels. I ordered one of the cheaper PET film protectors for my friend's N5 and after installing it on his I gave one a try on mine- I could live with it as you could barely see it, but I was not happy with the way it slightly changed the feel of the screen and it was a big fingerprint magnet, so my screen always looked dirty. Someone recommended the TruGlass Screen Protector and while it seemed great, I hesitated on spending $30 on a screen protector as you only get one shot at the perfect install. After much back and forth I finally ordered it. After ordering I got an email that stated there was a delay and it would be about a week and a half before it could ship - the email came with a $10 credit to use on another Cruzerlite product, which was a nice touch.

I received the screen protector a week later, it came with a little kit to assist with install and I used the method of taping the protector to the side of the phone before peeling the film back. The install went perfect and the protector looked and felt great. Only issue was that there was a slight chip on the top left corner. Other than the chip it was everything I wanted - completely clear, it kept finger prints away and it did not change the responsiveness or feeling of the naked screen. I immediately emailed Cruzerlite about the issue and quickly got a response letting me know they would happily send out a replacement free of charge if I could just send a picture of the issue. I received the second screen protect just a few days later (which was impressive given it was sent around the holidays) and it is absolutely perfect. It doesn't go completely to the edge of the device, so it can be used with a case - but it goes far enough to the edge that you do not have to use a case.

Let me know if anyone has any specific questions about the product.

tl;dl Coming from someone that likes "naked" devices, I would highly recommend spending the premium on TruGlass protector. It looks and feel great. Added bonus is Cruzerlite's amazing customer service.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] fire1ce:
Great to read this. my is on the way to Israel. will take some time i guess...

can u plz post some pics for your device with the screen protector?
[Nexus 5 Accessories] kennyo112:
Here is a pic of the first one that had the chip, it's dirty but you can see how far to the edges the protector goes. Once cleaned, it looks flawless but it's really the touch that stands out as the best feature - it feels exactly like the naked screen.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] kennyo112:
Such a great product. I just noticed they are available for the GS4 as well, I am going to have to pick one up for my wife's phone.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] DowntownJeffBrown:
Ok so I got my hands on Cruzerlite TruGlass Screen Protector. First off I had sworn off glass screen protectors because of a past experience. But I thought what hell let's see what their protectors are all about. The price is very good compared to a lot of the competition first off. The screen protector is Lab tested nano-glass, Oleophobic coated, has a Anti-shatter film, has a 9H hardness rating and 0.25 MM thick. I applied the protector using the hinge method and it was a perfect apply. It seemed to just suction to the screen and all bubbles just ran out. Every corner stuck perfect which was my main issue with my previous glass screen protector that scared me away from these (was another brand). I honestly think the glass feels so much better than the screen of the nexus 5 itself. My finger just glides across the screen now and the glass is Crystal clear. It works well with every case I've tried which is a huge plus for those of us that use cases. Another thing I noticed is how easy it is to clean the screen. I've now had it on for over two weeks and everything looks like the day I applied it. I highly recommend these screen protectors and if I ever need to get another screen protector for my n5 it I'll be getting another one of these.

http://www.cruzerlite.com/screen-protectors/truglass-flexible-glass-nexus-5

Ok on to my pics :D

>^.^< Sent From Meow G2
[Zooper Widget General] Phil77560:
Hi,

I'd like to make a tree (toon) and the trunk would be the battery progress bar, but, how can I make the leaf following the trunc ????

thx for your help
[Zooper Widget General] tb01110100:
I would think that your best bet would be to find a pictures of a tree online and import it into your widet.
[Zooper Widget General] ewoodard024:
trees

Trees are fun.
[Zooper Widget General] Phil77560:
Import ?...yes ..but it won't do the effect I espect....

I'd like the trunc to go as the battery's progression bar.... and just want the leaf to follow the trunc... a kind a absolute position or something like that..but I don't know how :confused:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SuperSlimMcJim:
HI,

I have bought a new headunit for my car the JVC KW-NSX1 as it has Mirror link. But i wasnt aware at the time that the Mirror link only works with Samsung and Nokia devices. I have download the Samsung app for my nexus but when i connect my phone to the headunit the app crashes. would there be any way to make the app work on my phone or any way to trick the headunit?

Thanks

James
[Moto X General] byt3b0mb:
Hey all,

I created this petition to urge Moto and Google to incorporate the Unlocked GSM Variant (TMO) into the Developer Edition policy and allow the warranty to remain intact when unlocking bootloader.

Reasons:

1. Device is sold Unbranded

2. Device is sold with Unlocked Radio

3. Device is sold at Full Cost (no subsidy from Carrier / No Contract)

4. Cost is the same as Developer Edition ($549 for 32gb)

5. Developer Edition comes in one color - including Unlocked GSM Variant will allow Devs to use MotoMaker to customize their device and enjoy benefits of Developer Edition.

I figured that XDA is the best place to get some momentum to this petition and get it in front of the eyes of Moto and Google.

Please sign and share:

http://www.change.org/petitions/mot...-do-not-void-warranty-upon-bootloader-unlock?
[Moto X General] charlie-n:
Signed
[Moto X General] anirudh412:
I think you would have a much better chance if you created a petition to include the Dev Edition in the Moto Maker process. BL unlock voids warranty if it comes tied to a carrier. Simple as that. I dont think Motorola has the sole say in the matter. People would be rushing to the T-Mobile store for warranty replacements if they mess up their unlocked BL phones. Not something a carrier would want to deal with.
[Moto X General] byt3b0mb:
This device is not sold by t-mobile in stores, and is not supported for exchange or warranty purposes by t-mobile. t-mobile directs owners to motorola. That is why the petition is for Motorola.
[Moto X General] byt3b0mb:
Thank you!!!
[Moto X General] buschris:
signed.
[Moto X General] byt3b0mb:
Thanks!!
[Moto X General] UncleMike:
I think you're right. Possibly the engraving (or whatever the process is) would be an unchangeable "Developer Edition", Luke what comes on the DE models now.

I think the same should apply any full price device purchased directly from Motorola. If the carrier didn't sell or subsidize it, they should be under no obligation to provide warranty support, and should have no say in whether unlocking the boot loader voids the warranty.

I'm signing the petition - I'd much rather have my DE in black, though I have no intention of buying another one just to change color.
[Moto X General] alpha-niner64:
The lack of warranty acts as a paygate to prevent inexperienced users from claiming. If you were of the experienced type, you would have gotten a DE phone. The best compromise here is a customizable DE phone such that people like us doesn't have to make the choice between Motomaker with 16GB option or the DE phone. I would support the latter initiative.
[Moto X General] byt3b0mb:
you can get a 32gb (which is what i got) through motomaker unlike the carrier branded ones. Also, since the unlocked GSM edition is already part of motomaker, it would be easier for motorola to update the policy, rather than recode motomaker to include de devices. not that i am going to trade what i purchased, but I would buy a de version if i could change the colors. If i were to buy a de and change the colors right now, i would be voiding the warranty because i would have to disassemble my device and swap out parts.

just makes sense to me, hence why i started the petition :)
[Moto X General] :
I agree tho.... A petition here isn't going to be seen. Don't they have any forums?

Also... Phone makers are probably tired of rooting/flashing related warranty claims.... So their putting their feet down.

Plus... They aren't going to care about us "tinkerers".... We're an extremely small percentage of their customers. :)

Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
[Moto X General] skotturi:
I signed it although I doubt we can get them to change anything mostly because of the custom nature of the motomaker.

It unfortunately makes sense that they can't support warranties for phones that are as custom as the motomaker allows.

I don't think they're against us unlocking our BLs, they just can't afford to replace our custom colored phones.

I doubt its a tmobile thing because as was mentioned, tmobile doesn't support the phone anyway, they just send you to moto.

They provided us with the DE and made it as colorful as possible without loosing appeal (a pink and green DE would have probably not sold...)

I wanted a custom moto x because I believe in the phone and the work moto + G has done to provide users with real features that actually meet our day to day needs (as opposed to some manufacturers who smoother users with "useful" features). Non-tinkerers recognize the colorful phone and ask me about it because its customizability is so heavily marketed. This sparks conversations that I enjoy having about technology actually being useful and not a barrier or a feature-laden learning curve.

What I would really like to see are stats on how many people return phones from messing up their BLs? How many galaxy nexus' and nexus 4s were returned bricked? While I see where they're coming from, it seems like they missed hitting the nail on the head, and are unfairly punishing those who do the majority of their mouth2mouth marketing. I don't want to speak for everyone here but I know when my friends are looking to buy a new phone they ask me what I think and recommend. My guess is that if the sales earned from the tinkerers word of mouth was accounted for in their business model they would perhaps consider this petition.
[Moto X General] cliffr39:
I signed. I would have bought the DE version, if the Today Show $150 worked on it.

Doesn't matter to me either way, but would be nice to fully back their hardware regardless.
[Moto X General] NJGSII:
Signed as well. Would've bought a dev edition if the cyber Monday discount would've applied to it. I feel that if I buy a phone that is not subsidized by the carrier I should do whatever I want with it because I paid for it in full and that means that's mine. If I mess up my phone it's on me and not them.
[Moto X General] untyped:
Signed!
[Moto X General] Johmama:
Guys, I'm sorry to rain on your parade, but this will never happen. They barely made it possible for Dev Editions warranties to remain intact after unlocking the bootloader. That wasn't a start of a movement, that was the whole not-making-sense deal of calling a phone a developer edition, but not being able to do any development on it if you want a warranty. And I know the board of execs at Motorola probably spent weeks weighing the pros and cons of doing that. They must have figured that being able to advertise that decision is a bigger PR advantage than the money lost by replacing the bricked devices that were a cause of that decision. Heck, even the Nexus line has their warranties voided by unlocking the bootloader.

The whole reason unlocking bootloaders voids warranties, is because after unlocking, you can flash files not signed by the manufacturer. As in, any file anyone, experienced or not, with good intentions or not, of any general technology experience, has put together. You can run commands from the prompt that will literally brick your phone in 1 second. Can you see why the Moto X Dev Edition is the only phone (that I've heard of) to make it OK to unlock the bootloader? You could purposely flash a malicious image, brick your phone, then request an RMA, just because you feel like it. I'm not saying that anyone here would do that, but look at this from their point of view. If you open the doors, people will walk through.

Look at this at a wider angle. What personal electronics device other than the Dev Edition Moto X is it A-OK to unlock the bootloader? Virtually nothing. It just doesn't make business sense to allow everyday, John Doe users to execute mission-critical commands and have your business responsible when John Doe flashes a kernel for another device because he apparently can't read. Or run a command that someone on the Internet said was OK to run, because hey, who would go on the Internet and just lie? I'm sorry guys, but we need to thank our lucky stars that even the Dev Edition got that capability. That Motorola decided the PR gained was worth the money lost replacing units.
[Moto X General] buschris:
doesn't the DE already have the bootloader unlocked? And there are many phones that already have unlocked bootloaders, I wonder seriously how many have been bricked so bad that they needed to be replaced? There has to be a way to recover these phones regardless.
[Moto X General] :
Probably not allot of returns from bricking... Considering "rooters" are a tiny fraction of overall consumers.... But, they know us small percentage root... And they don't want to replace a single phone because we messed it up.... that's my guess. I saw plenty of posts in the t989 S2 forum from guys planning to send in rooted phones. They figure if it won't boot... How will Samsung know the difference. The phone makers know this too. So making us unlock on their website is smart, cause they know for sure who unlocked.... Weather they can boot our RMA'd phone or not.

I'm OK with this... Yes, I voided my warranty on day one. It's not just phone companies that don't want to replace tampered with products.... Almost anything you buy now has a warning about warranty being void if you do or don't do this or that. Electronics of any kind usually have a sticker, or whatever, that if you disrupt by trying to open the device up.... Boom. No warranty anymore. Even the tags on clothing.... They're itchy, but if you remove them... Warranty void.

Almost anything really... If they know you tampered with it in any way... Warranty void. Why would phones be any different?

Even if very few people tamper.... They still don't want to give up a single dollar if they don't have to. Lol

Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
[Moto X General] byt3b0mb:
really just changing the software should not be a warranty breaker - the OEMs have tools to low level flash any device back to the stock software and even hard bricks can be repaired. The OEMs should honor the hardware. That is the point of this petition - honor the hardware. unlocking the bootloader and rooting a device has no impact on the hardware. I am not asking that they accept all devices that are broken by the user by doing something stupid, but rather allowing folks to flash a custom recovery and take charge of their device.

are there any computers that have their warranty voided when you remove windows and install linux or vice versa? NO because that is a software change. If the hardware fails then that is something the OEM should cover.
[Moto X General] byt3b0mb:
Good info and you have some great points - the average user wont even go to the developer section to find out how to unlock their bootloader. The amount of folks that actually buy the motomaker version and unlock the bootloader is probably very low, so the impact to moto would also be low. Also, the people that are savvy enough to get to the bootloader unlock page more than likely know what they are doing.