yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] jparasita:
I must say this tablet kicks but after installing clean rom sooo Snappy!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
No, I cannot say...

If it did work you would loose all 3G capability.

I may port it over later on... But right not I am only working with the P600

Good deal man!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] htcthd1:
Issue with Internal SD card write acces

Hi All!

I would like to report an issue I've encountered after flashing this ROM;

I've rooted (with CF Root as described here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2490805) my tablet and flashed CleanROM with TWRP 2.6.3.0, unfortunately after this operation few apps no longer have write access to internal SD Card (ES Explorer, Titanium Backup, TouchPal tested so far), after searching the web I've came across possible solution - changing platform.xml file in /system/etc/permissions, but all lines that should be added to the file are already in place.

Any help would be greatly appreciated - thanks in advance!:)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] blackheart2925:
Thank you very much! I will hope and pray that you do find some time for it :)

May sound funny but ever since I discovered android and xda, all my device and tablet purchases have been closely aligned to the amazing amount of work done here by some fantastic people on the forum.

For the first time I seem to have fallen for a tablet which does not seem to have that level of support .

I love the concept of writing on the tablet and sketching workflows as part of my work instead of doing that on regular paper...if only others had also jumped on the digitizer, spen support like samsung then probably would have better choice on what to buy.!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] a.demarco:
Getting this tablet in a few days, looking forward to this ROM! i ran CR 1.6.5 in my S4 until very recently, and it was great... I will donate as well after Tuesday when I get paid.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Has anyone else tried this?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
I would recommend having both the mod and the revert mod in case the mod causes issues.

Simply flash in twrp, no wiping required!

Please let me know if they came out right :D
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] allan1313:
I had the same problem. The issue is with TWRP. It is not wiping the system and cache properly. I tried many things to fix it. The only thing that worked for me was to use Odin to put the stock recovery on and wipe it. This will wipe the internal memory clean so you will lose everything. Then I used Odin to put the stock mk1 ROM on the tablet. Then I put TWRP 2.6.3.0 back on and flashed CleanROM. It's a pain but it beats not having a working tablet.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] tiger505:
Originally Posted by htcthd1 View Post

Hi All!

I would like to report an issue I've encountered after flashing this ROM;

I've rooted (with CF Root as described here: http://xdaforums.com/show....php?t=2490805) my tablet and flashed CleanROM with TWRP 2.6.3.0, unfortunately after this operation few apps no longer have write access to internal SD Card (ES Explorer, Titanium Backup, TouchPal tested so far), after searching the web I've came across possible solution - changing platform.xml file in /system/etc/permissions, but all lines that should be added to the file are already in place.

Any help would be greatly appreciated - thanks in advance!

Has anyone else tried this?

REPORT: I'm on TWRP 2.6.3.0 and after flashing Clean my Titanium, ES file exp are reading my 64gb SD card and I did a full restore of 143 apps! Also all games are running fine including real racing 3.0. Not sure what could be the issue but my 2014 tablet is running perfectly. :cool:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] shiroimin:
I am reporting that both are working correctly for me. Thought the Revert Status Bar mod does not put it back. Which is fine
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] ckelly33:
I haven't used these mods but my status bar is black ( I think! ) what am I looking for pre-mod?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
I may have used the wrong one to revert. I will fix that...

The stock status bar is actually dark gray.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] tiger505:
I hope this is not too far off subject but on the status bar - I'm using Wanan Xposed (from the app store - and the Xposed installer needs to be downloaded) and it's working great with my 2014. One can change the status bar colors, clock, icons and a ton of other tweaks for the tablet, I'm kinda of amazed at the functions. Screenshot of my status bar below with center clock and other changes. Apex is my Launcher by the way. Just an FYI...
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Qbm:
100% better than stock already at this early stage in it's life! Without a doubt yes go for it
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] ¿Will-it-Blend?:
I don't know if this has been asked before, so please don't flame me, but do I have to make any changes to the kernel or is it fine just running it with stock settings?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] nrage23:
You should ask questions like this in the kernel thread. You will be fine with stock settings.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
I tried it and feel its smoother. Transition are better, etc. UI seems even more fluid.

Not sure about battery and all that. But over all I like it over stock and am runnign the v1.0.0.0
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] ¿Will-it-Blend?:
Welp... back on Clean ROM and Running the BinDroid kernel. Everything seems to be running fine. Great job devs:good:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
I agree!

Its a good combo.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] allan1313:
Scott has done such a good job on the rom that there is nothing to talk aboout in here lol

Impatiently waiting for Samsung to drop 4.4 :)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Kinda how I feel too.

Couple things I might update but, gosh, its got to be any day now we see a P600 4.4.2 ROM.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] rajackar:
And will that Rom come from Samsung or you?

any luck with porting the P900 rom?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] ¿Will-it-Blend?:
Samsung makes the ROM's, these guys just modify it ;)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Qbm:
Well mostly fix Samsung's bad coding lol

---------- Post added at 06:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:58 PM ----------

Did someone say 4.4.2 kit kat it's on http://opensource.samsung.com for the p600
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
No 4.4.2. Not 4.2.2.

Typo?

I will go take a look
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Qbm:
Typo and corrected ;)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] rajackar:
Kernel source for 4.4.2 seems to have been posted. I guess that means a samsung ROM probably isn't far off.

Usally kernel source gets posted after a ROM has been released.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] nabour:
emulated, legacy, 0 files

I've had this Note for several days now and have finally gotten settled with CleanRom. It took me several installs, including a couple of factory resets, until I figured which of my favorite tweaks was interfering with the rom.

I thought I had everything set up perfect until I noticed today that I have three copies of my e-books file. I have an emulated file, a legacy file, and an 0 file. And the sd card itself.

I remember having a similar problem with my Note 10.1 when I was flashing between aosp and touchwiz roms. Now I stick to touchwiz roms.

I have found several places on xda that give instructions on how to get rid of these extra folders. They involve a lot of flashing and recovery, but I am reluctant to follow any of them because they (the instructoins) aren't written specifically for the Note 10.1 (2014), which I have found to be a bit temperamental.

Does anyone have a link or an idea on how to get rid of the extra folders? I'm not troubled by the space being taken up, but I am bothered because I believe my apps will have trouble in the future finding files.

Anyone else experience this?

Thanks very much,

Barb
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] AestenD:
828MB Download, SM-P600_KOR_KK_Opensource.zip... Korean KitKat perhaps? Is the Kernel Source usually that big?

---------- Post added at 07:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:21 PM ----------

I'm FAIRLY sure that the legacy and the emulated versions are just what amounts to symlinks to your 0 version. I.e. same file, different ways of accessing it.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] nabour:
Yeah - I'm just wondering if I could merge them, or even do something that would leave me with a fresh start. I am new to this device so there is very little on my sd card that would be lost in a reset.

Or....... I've read elsewhere on XDA that I should just leave it and not worry about it.

Thanks for the reply,

Barb
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] AestenD:
That's what i'm saying.... they don't need merged because they are the same exact physical file, just 'shortcuts' if you will with different names.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Thats what I am saying! Where is the ROM???

But yes, ALWAYS after the ROM. This is starting to agitate me.

Someone out there has a 4.4.2 ROM somewhere... If you have that ROM and you need a confidential leaker email scott@scottsroms.com :angel:

If your not that person please dont spam me.

|

|

|

\/

Kernel source is that big becuase they include some modular stuff like the Sbrowser and other minor functions you cant get from AOSP. Samsung is prolly the most Dev friendly MFG there is.

Symlinks... Yes, thats exactly correct.

Thats correct...

Here is the Symlink code from init.universal5420.rc

Snippet...

# See storage config details at http://source.android.com/tech/storage/
mkdir /mnt/shell/emulated 0700 shell shell
mkdir /storage/emulated 0555 root root
mkdir /mnt/shell/container 0700 system system

export EXTERNAL_STORAGE /storage/emulated/legacy
export EMULATED_STORAGE_SOURCE /mnt/shell/emulated
export EMULATED_STORAGE_TARGET /storage/emulated

# Support legacy paths
symlink /storage/emulated/legacy /sdcard
symlink /storage/emulated/legacy /mnt/sdcard
symlink /storage/emulated/legacy /storage/sdcard0
symlink /mnt/shell/emulated/0 /storage/emulated/legacy
symlink /mnt/shell/container /storage/container

export SECONDARY_STORAGE /storage/extSdCard
mkdir /storage/extSdCard 0555 root root

# map "real" external storages paths also in same way. backwards compatibility.
symlink /storage/extSdCard /mnt/extSdCard
symlink /storage/UsbDriveA /mnt/UsbDriveA
symlink /storage/UsbDriveB /mnt/UsbDriveB
symlink /storage/UsbDriveC /mnt/UsbDriveC
symlink /storage/UsbDriveD /mnt/UsbDriveD
symlink /storage/UsbDriveE /mnt/UsbDriveE
symlink /storage/UsbDriveF /mnt/UsbDriveF

export SECONDARY_STORAGE /storage/extSdCard:/storage/UsbDriveA:/storage/UsbDriveB:/storage/UsbDriveC:/storage/UsbDriveD:/storage/UsbDriveE:/storage/UsbDriveF
mkdir /storage/extSdCard 0000 system system
mkdir /storage/UsbDriveA 0000 system system
mkdir /storage/UsbDriveB 0000 system system
mkdir /storage/UsbDriveC 0000 system system
mkdir /storage/UsbDriveD 0000 system system
mkdir /storage/UsbDriveE 0000 system system
mkdir /storage/UsbDriveF 0000 system system

* Note, I did not add any of the notes in that code. Thats the the script actually is.

Whats funny is in the init script it tells you where to go understand the symlinking, lol.

I just think thats funny :D

But anyways... The android eco system has changed so much that there are multiple symlinks to the same file so older apps will work.

In reality it should all be transparent. However, with a root level browser you can actually see the linkages.

If you are using, say, the Samsung file browser you will never know what is going on under the hood.

One last thing about this as well... Easy way to test this... Just copy the ebook off the phone to your PC. Then delete it in any one of the alleged symlink locations and it should be gone in all 3. If not then you have some sort of corruption but I would find that rare because you never ran anything LESS than 4.3.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Oh, and one last last thing...

If you really want to dump the sd storage... Just got o recovery and do a wipe of it. Beware, it will also do a full factory reset. But I think you know that.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] NaxIonz:
Can I pull the browser out of this ROM and stick it on my phone? I love the fullscreen + flywheel thingy it has.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Quadgem:
Kernel

Just for curiosity, I have tried BinDroid Kernel. Did not see any difference in speed or smoothness, but worst thing : it took nearly twice longer to charge ! Don't know if it's kernel related but I go back to stock for the moment, cause I spend more time charging my tab than using it :eek:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Qbm:
Really you didn't see any difference?

Try using my setting link below they. Really help with battery and speed but battery shouldn't be any worse than stock. What version of the kernel are you using?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2642292

Best to comment in my thread or the kernels so you can get the best help and not clutter up this one :)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Quadgem:
SecPhone.apk

May be stupid question but what's the use of SecPhone.apk in system/app folder ? As a tab is not a phone, can I remove it with root explorer and free 19,32 mb ? :p
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Sure go ahead, let me know how that works out for you :p

Wait, dont! It wont end well. There are still resources used from that APK that are required for the system to run.

Also you wouldnt be freeing ANY space useable to the consumer because you are not repartitioning the device.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Qbm:
Anybody figured a way to repartition the SD to make more usable space. Would be handy for a slimmed down roms ;)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] daoom:
Maybe I missed something but did the ML1 base used here get rid of the multi user feature that was in MK1?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] jbeitel:
I heard it did.

---------- Post added at 08:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

Scott. Can you recompile this rom and post again as r3 so us crack flashers have something to do? Just a thought. Lol
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Android.Ninja:
Yes, there is a way to do this. Respectively, I have 2 questions. Have you ever re partitioned a stock Samsung rom before? Scrosler has this rom slimmed down to a extremely stable, rock solid rom. ;) What are you wanting to acheive?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] mambraxneol:
Hy do you have the link to reinstall watch on?

thanks :)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Yep, they are trying to sell you on Knox instead.

Thats what Knox is about.

Actually, I was kinda thinking about just doing App updates and adding Watch on back to the list of crap... But its been a bad day and I need to feed the Verizon S3 there addiction first. I over promised them a ROM by a day so far. I am normally on point with my ETA's but man... Just too much of the real world going on.

I personally would not play with partitions on any device. That could be bad. Very bad ;)

Yes its here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31360541/N10.1/WatchOn-13112601.1.51.21.apk
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Qbm:
No I haven't but I'm a quick learner. As far as I'm aware Samsung use a system partition and leave you with just under 12 gig to use for storage. I know there's not as much not used space on the note but on the likes of the s4 they really take the piss leaving you with only 9 gig.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Agreed
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Android.Ninja:
Agreed X2

Developers don't need no stinkin' signature. ;) lol

---------- Post added at 06:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:24 AM ----------

You are exactly right.

Developers don't need no stinkin' signature. ;) lol
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] daoom:
I didn't play much with Knox but from I can tell reading the documentation online all it allows you to do is have "secure" environment for work apps and data which is seperate from your personal environment. I don't see how this would replace multiple users on a tablet.

Samsung seems to make odd decisions sometimes.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Quadgem:
Full charge notification

Any solution for having back a full charge sound notification :confused: Cause I don't want my tab to stay hours plugged (bad for battery life). Thanks
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
LYep

I never took out such a thing if it existed.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Duly.noted:
Dont really have to worry about it man. These things are designed to trickle charge even after having hit 100 percent to actually fully charge the battery. Leaving it on ensures a full charge. And the way they wprk they wont allow your battery to keep charging after it hits the realy 100 percent. I have left my note 2 and every other device I have owned on the charger every night since the note came out with no ill effects on battery life. Still strong.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
I was going to explain that but my response was easier to type :p

If you want to know the truth, the device actually discharges and recharges from 100% to 95% and then back up again.

It does that to stop the over charging (If you want more specific details that is)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] mantrajt:
Hi...maybe a little off topic here but I don't know if this is rom related or what....

I can't Chromecast music from google music using app in my note ... I do using my nexus 5.

Any ideas ?

Enviado desde mi SM-P600 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
I can check later today... At work now.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Benzzo:
I been searching around the forum but haven't found an answer. Can anyone tell me how to get more apps into the flashbar/sidebar thingy? It only allows for certain apps so I don't use it. Seems like a waste but if I could insert the apps I use most, if definitely use it
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] aburns7487:
MW Manager is an xposed module

MultiWindow Plus app (can run up to 4 apps)

Pen Window (add more apps tp the pen window)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] ckelly33:
What is the difference between the xposed MW and the one in play store that requires root?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] aburns7487:
mw manager uses xposed framework...
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] ckelly33:
Sorry, I guess I should have phrased that differently.... what I should have asked was what advantage does the xposed route offer over the play store/root method? How do they function differently from an end user perspective?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Here are my recomendations...

1. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mobi.xperiacle.mwappsmanager

along with but not needed...

2. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mobi.xperiacle.multiwindowplus

Both are also on XDA.

Why do I recommend these?

No special "modules" or other "stuff"

Just install and go.

Very easy to use and retain CleanROM Stability.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] AestenD:
Not sure personally.... but based on experience with an app in a similar situation(store/xposed) they were the exact same thing. Quite possible same with the Multiwindow. If not exact, then likely extremely similiar.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] aburns7487:
MW manager and MultiWindow plus are the same. Mwplus has ability to do 4 windows at once. Pen window adds unlimited apps to the small popup

---------- Post added at 07:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:38 AM ----------

i saw this under the general tab of our tablet, 4.4.2 leak someone was porting to p600. I was curious what you thought...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2639713
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Elim:
I didn't see it and also all posts until now about a leak are nonesense.

PS. I use Wanam xposed to add more apps to multiwindow. Beside all other great tweaks within this app.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Duly.noted:
Any luck so far porting that 12.2 p900 rom yet [MENTION=426561]scrosler[/MENTION] or did it end up being a dead end? Curious to see whether or not mods/kernels/roms will be portable across the different tablets easily.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
No value. Nothing there. Not even a screenshot of a leek. Just a build number.

Exactly, its not a leak unless, well, its leaked!

Nah, just gave up.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] mantrajt:
Any luck with chromecast ?

Enviado desde mi SM-P600 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Havent tried it yet. Wife is sick and I could not get into the bedroom to test it.

Can anyone else with a Chrome cast test this out?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] aburns7487:
Works fine for me. I have chromecast as well as Tronsmart T1000 for Ez Cast...both work

USMC OIF Veteran

Semper Fidelis

Boston Strong!!!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] mantrajt:
Did you try chromecast with google music app ?

With YouTube I have no issues...

Enviado desde mi SM-P600 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] :
Works fine for me:thumbup:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
Thanks Marine!

Thanks man!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Bsmith0731:
Works fine for me too
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] aburns7487:
we are all over eager for any update if the rom...

on a side not is anyone getting note pro 12.2?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Duly.noted:
Im thinking about it. The 10.1 is amazing but id really appreciate the extra screen space and the 10.1 is too small to hold for long periods of time. The 12.2 should lay across my forearms much more comfortably. I also write fairly large and lecture note at the size of a real sheet of paper will be awesome.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Scott:
OMG, I never thought anyone would say this thing is too small for them.

To me its ginomerous...

But I always preferred the 7" to 8" Class tablet.

On side note of the side note: Lenovo has a 27" Windows tablet... Thats HUGE!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] Duly.noted:
Its all about use and preference. Mine spends a lot of time on a stand or cradled in one arm while writing with the other hand.the 10.1 leaves too much space between my bicep and the tablet like this and thus never feels "secure" enough. I also use my tablet for pretty much everything for my business and personal computing. I use my dekstop for...........something im sure......ill get back to that. And yes the 27 inch windows and the 20 inch 4k tablet are both waaaay to big.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Android Developmen] nrage23:
I picked up the Pro 8.4 and it is fantastic. The 2560 x 1600 screen at 8.4 inches is phenomenal. I never noticed a bunch of lag on my 2014 but Kitkat and Snapdragon 800 equals butter on the 8.4.