yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hacktheplant:
Hello! I have a note 3 and in enough time my phone will boot then go to the at&t logo then just sit there for ~5~ min or even more...then sometimes will go back to the Samsung thing back to At&T logo and give it enough time and hard rest but it comes back and I have my phone again. Pain....in..my..ass

The solution: factory reset...but I hate doing this because I'm doing it repeatly now...

Has anyone else has this problem or have any advice for me?

Edit: Does anyone know anyone willing to trade a Note 3 AT&T for a SM-N9005? It has a glass screen protector and a aluminium home button.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Agent:
What did you do to your phone? As in did you root it? Try to install a custom ROM? A custom recovery? Anything like that? You can odin back to stock from Root De La Vega from what I understand. I don't see anybody trading their phone for a broken one. You can't even trade here on XDA, you have to use Swappa or something else.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hacktheplant:
I added xposed and some apps the ones I am using are

Call recording

Gravity Box

Wanam

I can't install any custom Roms bootloader is still locked :/

So I fixed it by just factory resting everything. So my point on posting this is to see if anybody has this problem. The phone isn't broken :) it in perfect condition. I just don't know how much longer I can take without an unlocked bootloader.

If you wanted I could screenshot of what apps are using root?
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Solarenemy68:
Try taking your SD card out and then see if you still have the long boot or loop issue. Some phones are having issue reading certain brand SD cards and it id causing long boots or other strange problems..
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hacktheplant:
Interesting....how old school lol

I'll try that
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hacktheplant:
That didn't help. Great suggestion tho :)
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wish777:
Just curious what (security hacks & advance mods) settings did you use in wanan?

when you got your note 3...You didnt carry over your sd card with anything on it did you from prior device? Or use titanium backup?

Id try to trouble shoot it this way...Disable wanan...reboot see If it does it again....If so, start with the other app and disable or unistall.....Keep trying you'll find the source
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FloOne:
Gravity Box is not to be used with Note 3 ROM. I know things work with it but the OP says not to use on TouchWiz roms. Or I might be wrong..
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danish6190@gmail.com:
Gravity Box

I had the same issue I guess it coz of Gravity Box, it is advised not to use Gravity Box on Note 3 Touch Wiz I removed it and never faced the Boot Loop or System UI Stopped working since then.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
Home LAN ok with WEP but can't connect to works WPA-PSK secured network.

I have a fairly new ROM

Operator version 5.40.1.179

Rom version 1.40.00 WWE

Rom date 03/10/05

Radio version 1.06.02

Protocol version 1337.38

ExtROM version 1.40.179 WWE

Don't really want to do another ROM upgrade unless it is ABSOLUTELY essential. Anyone have a similar ROM with a working WPA-PSK network?

When we set WPA-PSK on the Blue Angel it insists on 802.1X authentication with either smart card or certificate. Our network doesn't use either but the tick box to turn off IEEE 802.1X access is greyed out on the BA. It isn't greyed out when we use WEP.

Is there a registry setting I could amend to turn off IEEE 802.1X when WPA-PSK is activated.

Do radio upgrades also require full hard resets?

Do hope someone can help.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] jbn:
On the Network Key screen what are you setting in the Authentication drop down? You should be choosing WPA-PSK and Data Encryption TKIP. Uncheck if checked The Key is provided for me automatically, and enter the key in network key box. Key index should be 1 by default. You should IGNORE the 802.1x tab.

I will let others answer regarding the Radio ROM upgrade as I am not sure what exists for the BA. But I doubt that this would solve the question anyway.

Hope this helps!
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
Jbn,

We are doing exactly as you say (TKIP, uncheck auto key, enter key & key index 1). We haven't been trying to set the details on the 802.1x tab but when we failed to connect we took a look at it.

We have MAC filtering set up and have included the BA MAC address (as provided by vxIP). Checked and double checked the key.

Just been informed that setting EAP type to PEAP in 802.1x tab rather than smart card or certificate might help.

Fingers crossed this will fix it.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] hal:
Got it working

I had it working with my K-Jam original ROM, although I would much prefer support for 802.11i/AES...

Does anyone know if AKU2 introduces support for WPA2/AES/EAP-TLS or EAP-TTLS?

Now, there's a trick I think I read here before:

type your PSK with your on-screen keyboard, not the hardware keuboard.

Give it a try and let us know.

Cheers,

Hal

Oooops! Sorry guys, BA forum... My post is partly irrelevant.

Still, try the on-screen keyboard...
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
Re: Got it working

All suggestions greatly appreciated, I think I have been trying the on screen keyboard but I will recheck.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
Blue Angel will not connect to 802.11G network

I thought I would try out a few of the suggestions on my home LAN even though it was working fine under WEP. Then I would be set up for the office LAN on Monday (or so I thought).

It turns out my wireless access point does not have WPA-PSK facility (I may look for a firmware upgrade tomorrow).

However when I changed the network from mixed mode to just 802.11G I was unable to connect to it. Resetting back to mixed mode & it connects ok. It would appear that my problem is not WPA-PSK but more specifically 802.11G networks. Does WPA-PSK only operate on 802.11G networks or can it run on 802.11b?

I have seen the 5 page thread on the Wizard index relating to a cab installation / registry fix to enable 802.11g access. Unfortunately the cab didn't install on the Blue Angel.

Can anyone suggest a fix and do you have 802.11g access with your Blue Angels?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] jbn:
BA does not have 802.11g. The Wizard supports it with appropriate ROM or Registry updates.

WPA-PSK is independent of B/G. So, yes, if your workplace is G only then this could explain the problem that you are having.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
Thanks jbn, it's starting to make sense now.

I have just made the registry entries required by the Wizard to my BA. I'll reboot and set network to g and see how it goes..............

EDIT

DID NOT WORK. Perhaps the BA hardware simply can't do 802.11g. Can anyone confirm the WiFi of the BA is different to the Wizard AND not capable of 802.11g?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Othello:
IIRC, the BA uses TI's TNETW1110 chip, which does *NOT* support 802.11g at all. The code for supporting the newer TNETW1130 (which is what I think they use in the Wizard) is actually present ... which is why WiFi will become disabled if you turn on the 802.11g registry hacks in your BA ...
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] ratazzi:
BA cannot do 802.11g because of the hardware. Never, ever.

If you have a g access point, it must be set to mixed mode for the BA (or any b-only device) to connect. Note that while the b device is active on the network, any other g clients will see slower connect speeds because of the compatibility mode. This is why some homogeneous environments would set to disallow b connections.

As far as WPA-PSK goes, I am using it with my BA. Any connect problems I've had were always due to something set wrong on the AP. The BA is WPA, not WPA2 (a/k/a 802.11i). Also, it does not support the AES mode of encryption. So make sure your AP is set to WPA-PSK (1 is usually implied when 2 is not supported) and TKIP, not AES or TKIP+AES.

One other suggestion. If you happen to be using a certain type of Linksys AP, there was a bug in one version of the firmware whereby if you had ever entered WEP keys and then tried to switch to WPA, it wouldn't work without first clearing the WEP keys with a hard reset. I had this issue and it drove me crazy until I read about the solution.

Hope this helps,

Paul
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
ratazzi,

Thanks for your comments.

Don't think they will like it at work if I tell them I need to slow the network down for 50 users just so I can connect my BA :D

Could I connect a 802.11b wireless access point to my desktop / laptop at work (connected to the internet) and connect my BA to the access point without slowing down the rest of the network?

It is good to know that the BA can do WPA-PSK even if only at 802.11b. I realise 802.11b is fast enough for the BA but if corporate networks are running at 802.11g then the BA will fail to connect at any speed.

Any other solutions to connect a BA to 802.11g?

ActivSync is ok but I would prefer wireless.

Is there a SD LAN card that would do 802.11g (plus WPA-PSK)?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] jbn:
Enabling mixed mode on a decent Wireless Access Point will not force all clients to run at 11Mbps. Those that can will do 54, those that can't won't.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
That sounds good to me jbn, thanks again.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Doormat:
You can do that.

However your IT staff would probably go beserk.

I check regularly to ensure that none of my users has done the very thing ... One user demended that he be allowed to and got very annoyed when I refused. He didn't see anything wrong with introducing a consumer grade (read low security) AP into an environment where we had paid top dollar for AP's with heavy security and spent many many hours locking everything down as much as humanly possible.

Remember WPA-PSK is not intended for enterprise level security ... it's better than WEP but given a poor passphrase it's vulnerable.

A quick search of google says yes. Don't know if they are any good ... perhaps you could let US know?

:D
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
Some good points there Doormat.

If I use a complex passphrase (WPA-PSK) and MAC filtering I am assuming it will be relatively safe i.e. as safe as the main network since that is what the network guys have set up.

Having recently purchased an E100, 2 off E200's a C500 and a M2000, together with about 3GB of SD cards my budget is rather stretched.

As soon as I can I will pick up a SD LAN card and post my results.

Thanks for all the help from XDA-developers.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Stabilo:
Doormat,

My attempts with google suggest 802.11g only exists for CF cards not SD cards. Or that was the comment made 8th Jan by ms mobiles http://msmobiles.com/news.php/4767.html

Do you have a link for a SD card?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] hal:
802.11b devoces will impact 802.11g device!

JBN,

I have to partly disagree with you:

using mixed mode will negatively impact the throughput of you .11g network.

This is due to the protection bit that is being set then for the .11g devices/APs.

The global effect is that while the datarate of the 11g clients will be of 54Mbps (potentially), the real throughput on an enterprise grade AP will be at best around 17/18Mbps instead of 25-27Mbps.

That's a very good reason for corp netadmins to try and ban .11b devices on an 11g network...

Doormat, I agree with you. In my terminology an AP brought by an end-user in a corp network qualifies as a rogue AP and will be immediately blocked.

WPA2/802.11i/RSN with eap-tls/ttls or PEAP is the first basic rule of thumb... Even @home that's what I run. Call me paranoid ;-)

Cheers,

Hal
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] jbn:
hal, you are technically correct of course, but the net result in most configurations is not noticeable as far as performance goes. There is a huge difference with WAPs that were forced to B for all clients when only one such client had connected amongst a set of Gs. In my (limited I accept) experience there is no practical difference for most of the time. In high bandwidth environments it is an academic discussion because in those circumstances systems should be connected using 100BaseT or GigE in a switched network rather than a collision-prone network.

Let's not lose sight of the original question though with this level of technical conversation!
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Doormat:
Here's what I found:

http://www.digitimes.com/bits_chips/a20060209A9053.html

I must admit ... I hadn't noticed the march release date before.

:D
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Doormat:
Damn - hate it when I accidentally double post! :)
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] ratazzi:
It won't force all clients to run at 11Mbps, but introducing a b client in a mixed mode network WILL slow down the g clients substantially over the rates they would operate at without the b client. Read this: http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=16501220.

Paul
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] robal:
Hi

I've been fooling around with "secured" WLAN and my BA.

Conclusion... BA sucks ass :/

Even old HP H5550 is better at connecting to WPA-PSK protected WLAN.

BTW, I'm using 1.42.00 ROM with 1.15.00 radio.

So if you want to protect your WLAN and use BA, the only option is to use WPA-radius.(If sucker decides actually to connect to such network) It's not WPA2, but still it's secure.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] David_PDA2K:
An interesting thread I stumbled across... this guy appears to have got WPA2/WPA-PSK working on his BA somehow... I cant get WPA-PSK working.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=990995&highlight=WPA2#post990995

Does anyone know if there is anyone working on WPA-PSK support for the BA, and/or if it is at all possible?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] jakubd:
The post you are referencing to says only about connecting to WPA/WPA2 dual-mode network. And this is nothing special, as because of lack of WPA2 support, BA connects using WPA and that's the whole trick. I use this kind of connection here myself (Linksys WRT54g with Tomato firmware, and wifi is set in WPA/WPA2 mode) - BA with Helmi's 1.3.2 sometimes has trouble connecting, but sooner or later it connects and works fine.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] mda3:
ME !!! :) . I am newbie here and sorry for my bad English, my MDA3 can connect to wifi with WPA-PSK TKIP with pass. On my laptop i can't use my card 802.11b/g (tried with Netgear MA521, Toko) with this router (Acor WLan moderm 200) but on my BA it's working fine (internet, watch TV, chat...).

Here is my BA info:

Rom: (I think this rom is Ship version from TMobile Ger that i saw on wiki)

Version: 1.42.01.Ger

Date: 09/05/05

Radio : 1.13.00

ExtROM 1.42.116 Ger

Tell me if you have any question.

Tran
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] David_PDA2K:
Hi All,

So it appears that a number of people have got WPA-PSK working with the BA. :cool:

Yes, I can get it working without WPA-PSK, but I want it to be a 'secure' setup, as per the various other wireless devices I already have working.

For those of you who have got WPA-PSK working...Perhaps, can any of you answer if you were able to get it working using the following secure parameters:

- MAC filtering = ON (using the MAC address from vxIPConfig)

- Wireless SSID Broadcast = Disabled (I don't wish to broadcast my SSID)

My router is a modified Linksys WRT54G, running DD-WRT v23SP2.

I have it configured to a -

- Mixed Wirless Network Mode (B+G)

- On Channel 7 (2.442GHz)

- Using WPA2 Pre-Shared Key Mixed security mode

- and TKIP WPA Algorithms

- with a MAC filter Enabled

If anyone out there with this same router has got the BA working with WPA-PSK (or want to try testing it)... ;)

I'd be very keen to know what I'm doing wrong, or what steps are required to get it working.

Thanks,

David.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CarlosJavier_76:
Anyone with this problem?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.vine.android
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sorcio91:
i'm trying to restore my photo/video "backup" (simply drag and drop the camera folder from pc to phone) but after few seconds the transfer freeze and sometimes a pop-up appear with this message "android.media.process has stopped" so i can't restore my photo...

i've tried with single large files (2 or 3GB for each file) and all works great, i can restore my apk backup, my games backup ecc... the only thing that don't work are the photo.

reading on the net i have found different methods and i have tried to:

- wipe cache and dalvik, fix permission and reboot..... nothing has changed

- clear data in app->android media process..... nothing has changed

- return to stock 4.4.2 build... nothing has changed

- return to stock without configure google account.... nothing has changed

how can i resolve this problem? can someone help me?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sorcio91:
with ftp it works... so, is this a bug of android or my device needs RMA?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] puthsardarade:
[Q] Samsung Clone Galaxy S4(i9500) MT6572 / MT6589 Root, Rom & Internal Storage Help

Hi,

I have spent a great deal of time researching before posting this.

I have previously managed to flash and install a custom rom on other Android handsets but I am not sure with this handset as the information around may not be correct for me.

The S4 Clone was purchased from Thailand recently.

I noticed afterwards that I was unable to install apps as internal storage has around 300mb available in total under Apps however under storage available space is 9.41GB!

This is my main concern which I would like to resolve.

Mobile presently does not have any SD card.

I have installed the drivers for it on my PC so I can access it and view it as a camera and media player.

I would like to resolve the internal storage issue.

Or alternatively Root and resolve a new rom which fixes the problem.

MtkDroidTools has been installed on my PC but when attempting to root an error appears:

sh: /system/xbin/busybox: no found

cp: /system/xbin/su: No such file or directory

Error: SU inaccessible

SuperSU does not work for me - no SU binary, likewise for Superuser.

Also the following phone info:

Hardware : MT6572 (MT6589 is Fake!)

Model : GT-I9500

Build number : ALPS.JB3.MP.V1.8

Build date UTC : 20131011-104628

Android v : 4.2.2

Baseband v: MOLY.WR8.W1315.MD.WG.MP.V4, 2013/08/07 10:44

Kernel v : 3.4.5 (whl@server2) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Fri Oct 11 18:44:10 CST 2013

If I try to go into recovery mode it appears in a different language.

I am unable to install anything to the root of SD as I can only view the phone memory and presently I do not have a micro SD card - although I can get one if required.

People have mentioned scatter files, flashing etc, but I have no idea and I do not want to brick the phone.

I found a number of guides:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38337401&postcount=5

Looks useful but unsure if I have the rom file, I downloaded it from here:

http://forum.gsm-india.com/vbb/f39/samsung-clone-galaxy-s4-i9500-mt6572-tested-rom-here-3036/

None of the files have rom specified in their name?

Can someone please provide some very basic instructions on how I can progress with this, ideally with backup in place just in case? :)

Thanks in advance
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] future1803:
try turning it off, after that do the keis combination of volume up+home+lock, do it for a few seconds, after that it would say "no commands" or something like that, press any key, try whit all untill you see something like CWM Recovery, maybe it helps you!!
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] puthsardarade:
Merry Christmas and thanks for your response.

It was nice to receive a response from someone!

I tried your suggestion and I can now access recovery! :)

What would you suggest I do now?

Insert a sdcard and backup user data?

Wipe cache

Wipe data/factory reset

Then apply a rom update via an sdcard?

Should I be concerned that I cannot install SU due to not having enough space for SU binary?

Any advise on which rom?

Thanks
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] droidinterest:
maybe this will solve your problem

http://gsmhosting24.blogspot.com/2013/10/samsung-clone-galaxy-s4i9500-mt6572.html

i also have s4 clone mt6572 ,

try to wipe data,cache from recovery mode.

and reboot, after that you can try framaroot for root , or vroot

framaroot

vroot

or vroot

but if not wrong i succeeded root with framaroot
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] puthsardarade:
Hi,

I followed the suggested steps, deleted cache, data from recovery.

Rebooted.

Transfered Framaroot files.

Installed Framaroot

Selected

Install SuperSU

Eploit Boromir

Exploit result

Failed :( ... Exploit work but installed of Superuser and su binary have failed

Above was Framaroot 1.8.1

Also tried with 1.4.1

which states:

Your device seems not vulnerable to exploit included in Framaroot

I also tried impactor again and it shows the error no space left on device message again.

I also tried MTK Droid and got the same error as previously mentioned -

sh: /system/xbin/busybox: no found

cp: /system/xbin/su: No such file or directory

Error: SU inaccessible

Only thing I have not tried is the guide here: http://xdaforums.com/show...01&postcount=5

I could try this if it is worthwhile to try?

but I would require some further help or more basic instructions?

I can create a scatter file but then struggle a little on step 2 and the read back tab step?

Alteratnatively does anyone have any other suggestions please, as I am really strugglying with this?

If I cannot increase the phone storage space issue then using this handset will become a problem even with an SD card.

I installed all the essentials apps required and despite it being set to SD card, I am now left with 50mb according to what it states within app.

Phone storage had showed as having just 11.3MB space free from 14.3MB after everything has been deleted.

Final thing through all the various steps I had taken the IMEI number appears to have been removed, which I have read is common.

Luckily I located what it was from Google Dashboard but within there the device shows with two IMEI numbers.

I have attempted to re-set the IMEI number within MTKdroid but it appears to get wiped, any advice on this?

Should I be entering both IMEI numbers as 1 and 2 or one IMEI as 1 and 2?

Hope someone is able to help with both the above - storage space / unable to install SU binary issue and IMEI?

Thanks
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] droidinterest:
can you show your phone info ? ss maybe ?

or same with above ?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] puthsardarade:
Hi,

What phone info did you wish to view?

How can I provide this to you?

I got the following from MTKDroid:

Hardware : MT6572 (MT6589 is Fake!)

Model : GT-I9500

Build number : ALPS.JB3.MP.V1.8

Build date UTC : 20131011-104628

Android v : 4.2.2

Baseband v: MOLY.WR8.W1315.MD.WG.MP.V4, 2013/08/07 10:44

Kernel v : 3.4.5 (whl@server2) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Fri Oct 11 18:44:10 CST 2013
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] droidinterest:
ok i see,

try enter recovery mode (press vol up and on/off together)

wipe data/cache

wipe cache partition

reboot

and try root again with framaroot
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] puthsardarade:
Hi,

I have followed those.steps twice and still get su binary error.

May be because it cannot install due to lack on space on internal memory?

Any other suggestions?

Thanks