yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] arcticturtle:
Here's an update in case anyone is in same situation as i am.

Spend some more time tonight on this issue. Used rm command instead and i was able to remove/uninstall a few stock apps without com.*.apk

Play games.apk uninstalled, play books.apk uninstalled. But google current, google earth, google drive, etc... did unistall but as soon as i rebooted google updates those apps and download and install them right back into place. I use rm command and then pm unistall, is there something else i must do so that after uninstall google doesn't push these apps right back into place?
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Daley87:
My phone seems to be staying awake a lot longer than the screen is on. I have tried wakelock detector and the apps that have kept the phone awake (Facebook being the main culprit) dont add up to anywhere near the extra wake time. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Daley87:
Forgot this pic..
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] motumbo:
For me a simple reboot did the trick. My phone was not switching off unless I pressed the power button, I started to get worried about a hardware issue, but now is ok.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] aneesh99:
Hey guys, how's it going? So I've got a really strange problem, my device is easily accessed and works with ADB and fastboot, but I absolutely can not for the life of me get MTP to work. Windows always installs Google Nexus ADB interface (instead of Nexus 5) even when USB debugging is disabled and MTP is enabled.

Any ideas what to do next? :confused:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Vercion3:
Usb debugging needs to be enables after rooting and mtp enabked to transfer files. Same with my device. Not really sure of why. Make sure u have the correct driver installed also
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
Mtp is not mass storage btw. There is no mass storage in nexus 5

-----------------------

Sent via tapatalk.

I do NOT reply to support queries over PM. Please keep support queries to the Q&A section, so that others may benefit
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] aneesh99:
Aye sorry, meant MTP.

Well, one of my PCs recognizes it properly in MTP, the other two PCs keep installing the phone as 'Google Nexus ADB Interface'. Both seem to work when I switch it to camera instead. Weird!

Edit: I managed to sort it out kind of, but Windows keeps erroring out on installing an MTP driver for my phone. It worked for my HTC One though...

Edit 2 Just did the cheat fresh install of Windows by ungrading and it sorted out whatever problem was going on with both PCs, so all is well. Thanks for the help though!
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jorel43:
hello i had a broken screen on my nexus 4, i bought a replacement from etdtradesupply and i replacement the screen myself. everything was working fine for the last day and then the screen/digitizer became unresponsive? my question is - do you think its the screen replacement thats faulty or do you think it could be that silver tape that wraps around the digitizer, because i was only able to get the top part off the old one, the bottom metal plate has not silver tape.

Thanks.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MameTozhio:
something may have come lose on the inside. open it up and check if everything is okay.
[Nexus 5 General] m0biusace:
I went into the AT&T store to pull a microSIM from one of the phones there to compare signal between the Nexus 5, my Moto X, and an LG G2 that was next to the HTC One i pulled the sim out of...and when I removed the SIM and restarted my nexus 5 with no SIM inside, it connected to some random CDMA network. Voice calls ended in an "Error 16" being repeated by the operator, and data didn't work. My phone number was apparently 000-000-7714.

Weird. Oh, and for those wondering, the Nexus 5 showed much greater variation in signal strength when behind held, dropping 3-6dbm, while the LG G2 and Moto X barely showed any deviation at all. Peak signal on the Nexus 5 was -76dbm while laying flat, while the G2 and Moto X dropped down to 72, and this was pretty repeatable over the span of several minutes. Gonna test a friend's Nexus 5 in a day and see if mine is just defective.

EDIT: This was done running the .15 modem, not the most recent 4.4.1/4.4.2 derived one (which a lot of people complained lowered their signal strength).
[Nexus 5 General] digiblur:
That's Chicago IL Sprint system on the PCS band.
[Nexus 5 General] ritchea:
Haven't experience the CDMA thing, but I noticed this (laying it down) with my signal the first week I had my phone. It's not a matter oh holding it by the antenna, either. Same power variation also except I don't get that good of a signal at home.
[Nexus 5 General] compuw22c:
I noticed once on my N4 in the info app *#*#INFO#*#* forcing cdma only did in fact allow me to connect and use data. One of the options is GSM/CDMA/LTE auto as well which in theory could connect on its own to cdma. Again, this was on the N4 which supposedly didn't even "do" cdma (or lte, officially). Despite it seeming counter intuitive it seems carriers actually have roaming agreements across different technologies (cdma/gsm). I'd be interested to see if you can get decent data in rural areas forcing cdma on tmo to get off edge (I swear the only reason I still have att is road trips for work. Edge is a complete joke).
[General Topics] J273:
Hi guys

Ive recently got my jammin and have found that without installing the extended rom the device speed is alot better.

Bu theres 1 prog in the extended rom that i use alot which is the phonepad ...Ive found the cab located in the rom but the problem is the cab also install the voice app / pdf viewer and java app.

Is there a cab available thatll just install the phonepad and nothing else?

Thanks
[General Topics] iruja:
if you post the cab we can easily extract the parts you don't want, or you can do it yourself with WinCE Cab Manager
[General Topics] J273:
Ok brilliant ive attahced the cab

Thanks alot
[General Topics] iruja:
This cab doesn't install the voice cab or anything like it.

It makes 4 shortlinks and addssome values to the register, that's all it does.
[General Topics] J273:
so it just installs the phonepad...is there anyway of deleting all the etxra links .etc .etc and just it installing the phonepad ?
[General Topics] iruja:
No it doesn't install the phonepad, in fact it doesn't install any software at all, this cab.

However you can delete the shortlinks, located here; /windows/start menu/

But remember you still don't uninstall/delete the actual software.
[General Topics] J273:
Ah , ok ....so do you know the phone pad (touchpad thng for texts .etc .etc) ....Not smartdialing program...Is this actually located on the rom itseld or does it install from the extended rom.

As i thought it was installed form the extended rom but now this as got me thinking its hard encoded in the rom itself?

Is this rite on HTC devices?

Thanks
[General Topics] iruja:
The touchpad itself is included in the rom, however I've seen you can enable/disable some of those input pads with some registry settings.

Unafortunatly I don't know what settings and if it can be done on all htc devices.

On my wizard it's enabled by default.
[General Topics] J273:
ok ,Thanks for the help / info :D
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] winosxbuntu:
anyone getting force close and not responding on some or most of the games from the Play store with CM 10.2 ?

i currently switched to CM 10.2 aka 4.3.1 cuz it was fast, responsive with KT747 kernel better with RAM, more stable compared to stock 4.3 touchwiz

anywz long story short, games were working fine with touchwiz 4.3 but after trying CM 10.2 with my S3 I747, am getting force close (FC'S) and NOT RESPONDING on most or some games ............subway surfers is one of the many games i have installed crushing on the start

has anyone en-counted with this problem, any kind of help is great :cool:

EDIT: tried CM 10.2 with and without KT747 kernel and did not work

PS AM SURE THAT ITS NOT KT747 kernel so what it is ? :confused:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] xSharpi:
I'm currently running CM10.2 and I never had a problem with games crashing. I'm using Quantum V2 kernel from here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2390147 and everything works fine. Did you ever try using different kernels?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] winosxbuntu:
thanks but it still doesn't work, i think it could be the bootloader, but i dont want to mess with it

any other ways i can do to fix it

AOKP/AOSP roms on my phone has some or most of the games crushing but TOUCHWIZ 4.3 works perfectly but without a kernel its slow, buggy, takes to much ram thats why am trying 4.3 AOSP/AOKP roms WITH KERNELS :cool:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] winosxbuntu:
This is a logcat for everyone to see and analyze to see what's wrong

NOTE: found this LINE x might provide some help to figure out what's wrong

"Choreographer -|- skipped 52 frames! This application may doing too much work on its main thread"

Also the line below states the same thing

Some hope to fix my problem
[Moto X Q&A] scott62185:
This is what comes up when I try to get my unlock data via fastboot (I inserted X's in the middle of the #'s to protect my info). When I copy and paste it into the Motorola site it says my phone isn't eligible to unlock but it is a T Mobile phone so it should be eligible, right? I watched a YouTube video on getting the unlock data and his had the word "bootloader" before each line of numbers. Anyone know what I might be doing wrong? Thanks

... INFO3A55000XXXXXXXXXXX5303031

INFO444C4C00XXXXXXXXXXXXXX000#6943

INFO84976D7DXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX53E0387739

INFOD3732#53XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX00000000

INFO0000000
[Moto X Q&A] mschumacher69:
Make sure u remove the INFO and new lines, the unlock data should be 1 string of text on 1 line and without the INFO or fastboot or anything else.
[Moto X Q&A] scott62185:
I did remove the "INFO." And I put it in one line (and took out the spaces). But there wasn't anything that said "fastboot."
[Moto X Q&A] scott62185:
I figured it out! I didn't have my sdk set up properly. Thanks for the help :)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kn1ghtnsh1narmr:
On stock rom with sprint you can enter *#*#3282#*#* into dialer to enable sprint spark/LTE ADV if it is in an area. Anyone know how to do this in CM11?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kn1ghtnsh1narmr:
Anyone got any ideas?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] -Enkidu-:
sure you saw this already

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2515798

do the same thing, hit lte, edit, enable bands 26 & 41. I haven't tested a priority.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZOOPidy:
I have an AT&T Note 3 that has suffered from water damage. What can I do to get this replaced? Will they mail a new one to me if I file a claim saying that it has been waterlogged?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE

So a little while ago I checked all the water indicators and they were red still, so I took it to AT&T and they gave me a handout to file a claim with Asurion either by phone or online. They sent me back home and told me that Asurion will mail me a box, where I put my damaged phone in, along with the battery, and the SIM card. I tryed to submit a claim online, but it would not let me. It said that for my protection I would have to go on with the instructions on another phone. I will attempt to call them later once I have another phone in hand.

ALSO looks like I am going to have to pay the $199.99 deducatable. Asurion says that it will be replaced with new, like-new, or "other models of like kind and quality"

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes:

Also in case you were wondering, if you are paying the standard $6.99 a month insurance, they will still replace your phone from water damage.

Don't take it into the store (they will send you right back out with a handout with Asurion), just file a claim with Asurion on the phone and have them send you a box, put your phone in it, mail it back, and they will send you one "overnight".
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Solarenemy68:
By insurance, do you mean regular warranty or are you paying the extra 9 bucks a month for their anything coverage? If you have the later just take it to a store and tell you have the extended insurance, the phone was dropped in water and you want a replacement. They should replace their on the spot. If you do it through mail, then they will wait till they receive your damaged one before sending you a new one. They will use your old one to refurb and sell as a refurb. They will not send a new one in the mail till they get the old one. Best option is do it in person.

Now if you just have the standard warranty then you are out a phone as it does not cover water damage rather accidental or not.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Agent:
Assuming your talking about Asurion, yes. The deductible is pretty high though if I remember correctly.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZOOPidy:
RIght now I am paying the $9 insurance from AT&T. Would I have to take it into the store or file a claim online?
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JACK4HIRE:
I went through this last month myself and it is the main reason I switched to Square Trade for my insurance needs.

1. If you have the Mobile Protection Plan IE. you pay the extra $9.99 per month, and you go to into an AT&T store, they are not going to give you a new phone on the spot. AT&T will put you on the phone with an insurance representative from Assurion who is the company that handles AT&T insurance claims. The Assurion rep will get some info from you and then Assurion will overnight (FedEx) you a refurnished phone and a labeled box with which to return your damaged phone.

2. You will receive a 'like new' phone.

3. You will be billed a $200.00 deductible for the phone you receive.

4. You will have 10 days to mail back the damaged phone or you will be billed $750.00.

The reps at Assurion have an average IQ of 85 and are not very nice, so listen up. You may also notice that all the female reps have names like Cherry, Porche, Candy and such. Draw whatever conclusions you want from this.

1. Take photos of everything before you send the phone back - the box, its contents, the phone, the labels et al.

2. Make sure you save the receipt you get from the post office when they scan the label as it will have the tracking numbers and such. It is also proof positive you at least mailed the label back.

3. Once you mail the box back, wait 3 days and then start humping Assurions leg asking them if they are tracking your shipped phone. I recommend recording the calls if it's legal where you live. If you can't record the calls, then take detailed notes.

4. Anticipate harassing texts, emails and automated phone calls reminding you to send the damaged phone back. You will get these at all hours; day and night.

If you do the above you will have the evidence needed to defend yourself when Assurion claims they never got your phone and that you never shipped it as they tried to do with me and a buddy of mine just last month.

And before I forget, make sure you make the person from Assurion you are speaking with initially tell you twice what model phone they are sending you. They sent me the wrong phone two times.

The only good thing that came out of my AT&T insurance experience was that AT&T was so horrified by Assurions conduct that I was given family text messaging free for 6 months ($180 value) and an additional $20 off per month from my bill for as long as I am an AT&T customer.

Nothing like an Assurion rep cussing at an AT&T store manager and then hanging up on her to bolster your case.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] slimslim:
I thought if you lose your phone they'll still send you another one. Declare it stolen or lost, isn't it easier?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Gary02468:
What you're suggesting is insurance fraud, which is a crime.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] slimslim:
Agree, but in tis particular case the op stated that the phone suffered water damage, don't think there's much to repair or save from it. With water resistant devices is a different story as the internal components and the mainboard are still coated and somehow protected. Now if you run over your device with your truck what sense it makes to send it back to Asurion and risking of being billed the full amount if someone misplace or loses it.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZOOPidy:
Thanks that really helped [MENTION=5605614]JACK4HIRE[/MENTION]
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JACK4HIRE:
I can't speak to how AT&T and or Assurion would handle the 'loss' of a phone versus a damaged phone. I do know that part of the Mobile Protection Pack is a locator service to help a client with a lost or stolen phone locate it. I believe that AT&T would attempt to locate the phone prior to issuing a replacement.

'Lost' is a very subjective term and I would think that as long as the phone was actually 'lost' there wouldn't be a problem. 'Lost' can mean you snapped the phone in two and then threw it in the trash bin at the grocery store never to see it again. As long as you don't still possess the phone and then claim that it is lost, there is no 'fraud'.

Having said that; I don't really see the purpose of claiming the phone is lost versus damaged as you're still going to get the same marginal customer service, the same iffy replacement and a $200.00 ding on you next bill from AT&T whether you claim water damage or loss.

It's always best to keep things above board even if you screwed up and have to eat it. Companies do refer charges to the police and people do get arrested and prosecuted for fraud, insurance and otherwise, all the time.

Just my $0.02.

Let us know how it goes.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZOOPidy:
I will not report it lost. It has water damage so water damage it is. Thanks though guys.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Agent:
Guys, this is just plain illegal and is not allowed on XDA at all. It's not that hard to just send your damaged phone in. Parts can be salvaged off the phone water damaged or not. It doesn't take that much effort to just send the phone to them.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZOOPidy:
UPDATE

So a little while ago I checked all the water indicators and they were red still, so I took it to AT&T and they gave me a handout to file a claim with Asurion either by phone or online. They sent me back home and told me that Asurion will mail me a box, where I put my damaged phone in, along with the battery, and the SIM card. I tryed to submit a claim online, but it would not let me. It said that for my protection I would have to go on with the instructions on another phone. I will attempt to call them later once I have another phone in hand.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KennyG123:
Thank you for doing the right thing! This is what insurance is for.

Friendly Neighborhood Senior Moderator
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Agent:
+1 on that thank you!
[General Marketing & SEO] Burkey:
Hello XDA-Dev's!

I have published my first real game to Google Play (last month actually) and been slowly updating (with more changes to come in the next few weeks) but wanted to try and get some feedback if possible.

It is inspired by the old Moon Patrol arcade game, but given a bit of a spin that I hope makes it more playable on a touch screen. Things that I am presently working on are some "Boss" fights and a few new zones to spice it up.

Controls are very simple, the left side of the screen can be tapped to jump while anywhere else is tapped to fire at that location.. my desire is to keep it simple for comfortable play on a phone while commuting to/fro work.

Any comments, suggestions or feedback would be greatly appreciated.

The game is on Google Play: com.bitgen.mars_patrol (sorry I cannot post links as I have never logged into XDA-Developers before. Only ever read it while at work, not posted).

It is free/Ad support
[General Marketing & SEO] Karriz:
I like the graphical style a lot, will certainly check this out.
[Nexus 7 General] vorcers:
Thank you Sir for this fine explanation and hints. You prooven my thoughts I had about flashing bootloaders with fastboot. (See my signature ; the posts are still need to be updated for your hints)

I think, that we should "flash" the bootloader only at one point: if we get via ota. Flashing the bootloader is so damn risky... I think, it shouldn't be done three times day and only if there is an update...
[Nexus 7 General] AndDiSa:
Yes, I agree, flashing bootloaders is the most risky part, but flashing by OTA has always been more risky than flashing it by fastboot. Using fastboot you can control the flashing process and try to re-flash if anything fails, OTA is out of your control ...
[Nexus 7 General] vorcers:
This is maybe right, but as bftb0 stated, the bootloaders packed in the factory images can't really be trusted trusted anymore. You will never know what you get. I also can remember, that there were faulty JWR66(V/Y ? I don't know) nexus 7 factory image, which google replaced later. So I think, flashing via OTA is safer. Don't you think google tested this ota-flashing thing till the last bit? Don't you think google tested their ota-packages?

Is there a known ota-fail on stock, always-

unmodified

device (especially, with bootloader-dead devices following an ota-bootloader-flash)? I made recently a lot of updates of the stock ROM with ota - from Android 4.2.2 till 4.4.2 - none failed. I trust the google-ota mechanism more then all custom-recovery-flashes.... but only, if the device is completly unmodified.

I am excited about your answer! :good:
[Nexus 7 General] AndDiSa:
It's your decision to trust OTA more than flashing system image files by fastboot, but I think you are missing the point: If you are flashing a corrupt / wrong / ... image then the results by OTA and fastboot are the same. A bootloader update by OTA is nothing else then flashing an image file (like you do with fastboot) , only that it is done automatically on the next reboot of your device while a fastboot flash is done immediately.

I agree that the quality check of Google's system images does not take place at the moment and that the probability of getting a working OTA (at least for the moment) is most likely higher, but this does not influence the flashing process itself. fastboot is more secure than OTA ... if he file you are flashing is working ...