yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Micromax A116] saurabhsunil:
I have installed gravity box and i reverted back the settings made in the lockscreen..but still the same

I had done full data wipe..n this is not my 1st time

and i use default launcher

but i would like to have the clock on the top i sort of dont like it in the middle
[Micromax A116] cmahendra:
[MENTION=5017837]saurabhsunil[/MENTION] Did you take nandroid backup before installing Xposed+Gravitybox? If yes, you can restore and see if it was ok when you flashed?

Else, I will suggest you to reflash the rom and check all the basic features of rom if working or not, before installing Xposed+Gravitybox.
[Micromax A116] saurabhsunil:
its not because of charging sign coming in between the clock that i want the patch...

i wanted the clock on the top from start...i dont like it in the middle..thats what i want to say...can u please provide the patch for me?
[Micromax A116] cmahendra:
I am working on other high-priority things. Your request is not practically possible at the moment. So not sure if this can be done. BTW the clock and charging percent shows perfect in place without overlapping. :)
[Micromax A116] shivambajaj:
Rude but reasonable :)
[Micromax A116] saurabhsunil:
Its alri8 ,i understand...:):good:
[Micromax A116] shivambajaj:
Hey [MENTION=4448971]cmahendra[/MENTION]

I noticed this feature in other Roms like the miui...supposing I'm playing a full screen game....and it requires internet...I can directly access the notification drop down menu directly from the game...ie the game will be running in background...is that possible in ur ROM ...if so how??
[Micromax A116] cmahendra:
MiUi have their own completely modified set of framework since 2 years and have different set of libraries too which makes many other things possible which Google team did not care for. Replying from phone. But there could be some XPosed Modules. Keep searching.
[Micromax A116] shivambajaj:
Alright...saw the same feature on my friends note 3 running on stock...
[T-Mobile LG G2x] ckismias:
tried to install cynaogen 7.2 i belive my sd card was damaged if it matters. Flashed didn't work, bricked attrmpted whole bunch of methods to unbrick lg g2x (lg p999) didn't work kept getting stuck on lg screen couldn't see s/w update screen. folloeed instructions on http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2020737 lg p990 All-In-One Toolkit. Got phone to enter recovery, nothing after was sucessful. Help me just got this phone like 10 days ago.:confused::(
[T-Mobile LG G2x] Pain-N-Panic:
This is for the G2X's cousin, the P990. This is the P999, so I am not surprised that it didn't help you. Check out Rom for Recovery. It has helped many users restore their bricked rigs to working fashion. Good luck and post results!

ROM for Recovery thread/instructions- http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1248644
[T-Mobile LG G2x] ckismias:
FIXED MY PHONE. Saved my soul

:laugh: followed instruction Nothing but love :D
[T-Mobile LG G2x] Pain-N-Panic:
Glad it worked! Now flash away!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Dillsnik:
Just curious to hear what people are currently running on their S4. I just noticed it looks like 4.3 update is finally available for ATT so might just flash that for now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] hovax615@hotmail.com:
Questions go in the Q&A section.

Using stock 4.3 mk2.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Dillsnik:
Is mk2 good? I thought I read something negative about it somewhere... And was that the one where once you update to that you can't revert?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] DeadlySin9:
You can't revert once you're past MF3. MK2 has been working just fine for me, the only negatives are you don't get ROMs or recovery, neither TWRP/CWM or SafeStrap. Also, they removed the network data toggle which does suck.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Dillsnik:
You mean from the drop down where you can just flick it on/off? I don't use that one too much but I know what you mean...hate when I lose toggles I was using before.

But No ROMs or recovery?? Is that just cause it's pretty new? Seems surprising
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Ramrod421:
I'm using Gummy 4.4.2 and it's working awesome!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Naddict:
Well, this thread is being closed as "everyone" is a subjective term, there are plenty of ROMS for many users that many are using.

This question can only be answered by the individual user? Try all the roms over in the development threads - that is why we are here, and the fun part of the journey.
[General Questions and Answers] jordan1296:
I have some questions about root.. I have searched for the questions below but i didn't get my answer.

1. Uninstallation of superuser cannot effect to the root? (Just confirming)

2. After uninstalling superuser will i be able to install more root needed apps? apps data will automatically install in their respective place just without any superuser permission..????

3. After unrooting phone root needed apps (which are installed) will work fine or not? and will i be able to uninstall those root apps?

Answer me plz..

Thank You.
[General Questions and Answers] Zeuscluts:
Answers:-

1. Uninstalling of superuser with clean Unroot will Remove Root Binary from System and will effect Root, as without SU app you cant play with Root..

2. No, You Can't.

3. No they won't Function. You can uninstall Root apps if they are in System Folder other you will be able to uninstall.

Thankyou,

Regards,

Zeuscluts

--------Hit Thanks--------

--------------OR-------------

Visit Some Cool Guides Hmpshah Guides
[General Questions and Answers] jordan1296:
What superuser app does?

Thank You very much.. I am satisfied by your reply.. :)

Delete it wanted to give reply.. but i posted it.
[General Questions and Answers] jordan1296:
What superuser app does?

Thank You very much.. I am satisfied by your reply.. :)

But tell me one more thing what superuser does.. i think superuser app only gives the permission to the root apps to install something in root area.. right? superuser app work is just to allow or deny the permission to the app right..?

So if i don't unroot my phone and if i just simply remove superuser app then i still should be able to install root apps in the root? because my phone is rooted.. and i have just removed superuser app which gives permission only.

I think superuser only gives the permission to the app SO apps will be intall in the root just without any permission of superuser?? this is what superuser does ONLY?

I think i am misunderstanding something about superuser.. Correct me please if i am wrong.. :good:
[General Questions and Answers] Zeuscluts:
Yes,

It gives permissions to access, modify your Root area[Restricted when you are Non-Rooted].

No,

Removing SU app will remove permissions with It. So after that you cant use those Rooted app which you gave Permissions when u had SU App.

Note:- Without any SU app you can't Play your System Files..

nor your rooted apps will work..

Regards,

Zeuscluts

--------Hit Thanks--------

--------------OR-------------

Visit Some Cool Guides Hmpshah Guides
[General Questions and Answers] jordan1296:
Okayy Thank You. :)
[General Questions and Answers] SEAxHAWK:
S4 mk2 i337 soft bricked...

This is the link I started dealing with:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2565758

Problem is, I uninstalled a system file or two...or 15...and now the phone will start up, but no apps show up, just black screen. I can navigate still and work around it, but what i CAN'T do is give permission to that batch file once it recognizes the phone.

Obviously, I didn't know what I was doing, so I didn't realize that unrooting it wouldn't solve the problem, so I need to root, and then somehow get my system files back in place. Titanium Backup says my back up doesn't exist...pretty frustrated, I've spent 10+ hours on this site and some others trying to get back in, so I apologize upfront for possibly missing a post elsewhere :(

S4 MK2 I337
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] arc209:
Need a little help here. I used Wireless Workshop to successfully flash my Sprint HTC One to Page Plus. I got my MIN, MDN and SID directly from Page Plus. I flashed it on Wireless Workshop and if said if successfully flashed. I then went into the Phone info and it shows my new number and the Verizon flash info, BUT,,,,

I cant get it to pick up the service. I have tried everything even had Wireless Workshop remote support and they could not figure it out. The phone wont pick up the network, it shows no bars and states looking for service. Please help. I left the Sprint sim inside the phone, because I was told to do so.

Any clues.....

Thanks
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] naturecannon:
I thought Wireless Workshop was an app/service you pay for to perform the flashing task. Arent they responsible to provide you with a working phone with service after using the service? I am just asking is all, one would think some guarantee would be at play after a money exchange :confused:

Did you try calling page plus and ask them to provision your account. I have flashed a few cricket phones in the past and sometimes things got wonky on the accounts on crickets end!
[HTC Sensation] bbo139:
Hello i tried connecting my phone to the Helo tc assault, but can't, I think it has a problem with the Isr signal. I have cm10.2 on my phone . With my nexus 7 I could connect . Any ideas, help?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] hepi_hape:
Jelo there

I have been using galnex for 4week and it great... (Second)

But yesterday i have issuue, my phone keep give charge state.BUT i dont plugged it. And i cant charge when phone on..

The weird one is when i trun off, it power up self than give charging state... #@$%@#

Are this hardware falure / rom / kernel?

Now im in cmetal 07122013 - mpokang superram

View attachment 2455069
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] hepi_hape:
View attachment 2455070
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] al3x90:
guys, come on, im really really tired to search for one stupid answer or 1 tutorial :(

is there any way to compile a kernel, or modify it by any means in WINDOWS...and not on ubuntu or linux or mac or whatever.

please....please, if there is, and i havent found it ( it will be a miracle ) on this site, give me a link to it, or just give me a yes or no answer.

I wouldnt post this if i hadnt had enaugh searching.

Im more interesting in modifying one, not particulary to build one.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sharingan:
these people can help you i guess
[MENTION=868594]Mardon[/MENTION] , [MENTION=3862405]SpaceCaker[/MENTION]
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Toni5830:
On windows you can use this http://www.modaco.com/topic/340710-tool-edit-bootimg/ which is not very useful

Or I know someone who use PuTTY to compile sources on windows, but I don't know how it works as I have a Mac to compile android, so you need to do some searches and see how it works

Sent from Italy using Tapatalk
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] al3x90:
" Updated the program. You can't edit ramdisk on windows... you can only list his content because windows doesn't suport systemlinks.

Also added a linux version. Enjoy "

This is a post from that link.

all im looking for, in makeing a kernel work on ext part and not on internal memory.

Plus, i have kitchen...and thats what im working with...but still, i cant find a program to allow me to edit the zImage file, where, i guess ( from what i've been reading around here ) i need to edit those things for ext part.

In fact, who can help me, and edit a kernel for me :)) i think that is my last resort, as i cant get, and probably wont, install ubuntu on my laptop, just for that :(
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mardon:
Adding features to your kernel | XDA-University
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] ThdDude:
​

If you like what I do hit Thanks, its totally free. Or buy me a Beer sometime.​

XDA:DevDB Information

[ROM] Official | 4.4.2 | HellKat , a ROM for the T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II

Contributors

ThdDude, DerTeufel1980, Cl3Kener

ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat

Based On: CyanogenMod

Version Information

Status: Stable

Created 2013-12-15

Last Updated 2014-03-09
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] hatememarkz:
First n once camcorder works fully this my dd all day
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] ThdDude:
12/14 build will be up in about 30 minutes.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] bzzybfrm313:
will download and try out thanks again.:good:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] hatememarkz:
Does camcorder work fully
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] ThdDude:
I have a skyrocket build compiling now as well.

Works like it has in past couple builds, slow to start.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] hatememarkz:
Then maybe just maybe I might be bakc god how I miss the color emoji
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] captainphoenixx:
My messaging and hangouts both FC. Anyone else having this issue? And at risk of sounding nooby, how do a get a logcat?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] thehandi:
I haven't been paying much attention to the scene the past couple months; examples of SELinux-compatible recoveries? Last I read, TWRP 2.3+ builds were buggy piles.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] KCJunkman:
I used CWM 6037 with no issues
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] JesusWazBlack:
thanks dude youre great
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] ThdDude:
My guess would be the gapps your using. I have been using the same ones for over a month no issues. I had gapps linked in OP but then get to many questions about newer Gapps and other packages. So I stopped recommending them but look here. I use gapps-kk-20131111-artcompatible.zip without issues.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] juankyhd2:
Sms/mms/hangouts not work,wipe dalvik and same issue/camcorder record fine but video play full color lines,im not use camcorder for now,but i use sms frecuently,otherwise its a great kitkat rom!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] ThdDude:
Look 1 post above your last post. And video is fine here other than the slow start. Playback on phone is just as clear no color lines for me.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Playnhooky:
Sms working fine here , using TWRP , did a superwipe , dirty flash since the first build . The latest build is a little laggy on the home button press and hold , it dosent always show all the open apps , you have to wait 30 secs. Or so and press it again to get it to show all the open apps .
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] JNMM:
Some of the 4.4.1 -2 ROMs have that issue I believe
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jmelvin:
Using the same gapps-kk-20131111-artcompatible.zip on cwm 6044 full wipe and hangouts fc's on me also. Worked just fine on the alpha 12/11/13 build. Gonna load the backup for now.

Keep up the excellent work [MENTION=2993366]ThdDude[/MENTION]!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] captainphoenixx:
That is the gapps package I am using
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] ThdDude:
Would you all be applying a theme by chance?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] captainphoenixx:
That was after full wipe, clean flash, and only log in to gmail
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] efayes:
Hello all, is it possible for you guys to extract and upload these mentioned programme? And i'm wondering whether we can install these programme on O2 XDA Mini? :P
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] PhxDroid86:
Thank you so much man... my buddy accepted the OTA (without listening to me when I told him to wait) and has been hounding me to get JMX on his phone since it was released... your guide answers so much and provides adequate links... if I can buy you a beer let me know how
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] PhxDroid86:
Funny thing about Knox...

Lets say an employee isnt rooted or custom and has knox-provided accessvto company/enterprise material... how is that more safe than a person who roots/mods their phone with processes/roms that are provided through xda which monitors (these downloads/processes with advanced moderators/users) more frequently and just as fast as even microsoft can inhibit billions of porn site "foul play".

Honestly... if I invested in Knox for my company, would I feel more protected from a closet porn fanatic than someone who was intelligent enough to root and flash custom roms through proven methods?? Moreover, why flag the "flasher" and make his device "null", while allowing the "porn-surfer" continual access to my companies "sacred data"...

Nothing against porn surfing just my analogy of how foolish businesses are too buy into this... ultimately I think knox isnt just an enterprise security for any any company outside of samsungs own personal interest... they are probably receiving "knox flag" info from every phone "tripped" and will increase device pricing accordingly
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Because with Knox the access is limited. so let's say you have access to financial documents. In the Knox environment you can't copy it and send it to a competitor. Read the

Containers & App Wrapping section from the link in op. There's also protection from key logging apps, etc. To your porn addict analogy with Knox regardless of the morals of your employees they can't physically compromise any data.

Knox really is great for corporations and a brilliant move by Samsung to try and take some of the corporate market from apples locked up devices. The problem is carriers using it to deny warranty claims (which there seems to be mixed reports if they do or not) and most of us dunt need it
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] ciphercodes:
I think it's good for corporations who provide cell phones to their employees, this does not fit well in BYOD environment.

Samsung should have released an enterprise firmware altogether and the developers at each company can update/modify as per their policies.

On a funnier side: Whats next - Verifying the device status or KNOX via download mode at gates? :D
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
I think the point is for the BYOD system because they know your phone is untouched since Knox can't run if you've ever rooted your device. I would be all for enterprise firmware though.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] PhxDroid86:
Doesnt root access on any device get exploited by "holes" that the device already has in place prior to any dev taking advantage of?.. yes by having Knox, a company can "potentially" know when they've "potentially" been compromised but those same holes are being exploited by "foul play" (whether that be porn sites or the like) and most of these exploits dont need root access established by the device holder in order to gain access... to single out the rooter is totally irrelevant
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
I think you're a little confused on what Knox is (and possibly a porn addict). Knox in its most simple definition is basically a dual boot in Android. It is it's own environment, separate from your other apps and only certain apps and programs can run within this Knox environment. The reason root is"singled out"is because your device is no longer secure and you could potentially gain unauthorized access to the Knox sector now. Yes there may still be potential to access information from Knox without being rooted, but it would be very difficult and your average person would have no idea how. There's a reason it is the only DOD approved mobile security system.

So basically Knox isnt just a number on your download screen that says if your phone is rooted.

By the way joking about the porn addict thing.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] ciphercodes:
Yes, I do understand but again asking an employee to have his personal phone in compliance with company policy does not go well. Yes, you can have them not bring their phones if it's a requirement.

From security standpoint, it helps to save encrypted company data if phone is lost, maintain system integrity and detect tampered devices.

But pushing this type of update without informing the customers that there is no going back is not a good move.

This is a broad topic for discussion !
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Ya I didn't explain my point very good. I agree with you. Knox is designed for BYOD however it would make more sense for a corporation that requires that level of security to provide a phone to their employee, the they can put as much security on it as they deem necessary.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] PhxDroid86:
It only makes sense (when talki mm g byod) if an employee has to turn their phone in at the end of the day (not exactly byod at that point)... when it comes to addicts (whether that be porn or anything else) the bottom line falls on integrity, not encryption... for a company to trust an employee to do things with their device (beyond their control) is a matter of integrity. Encryption is irrelevant. My dad is a senior IT manager for one of the 5th largest cities, by brother in law is an IT manager for one of that cities najor metropolis's and I have many friends capable of programming things in manners not in accordance with benefiting the whole as a group... I know both sides of the equation... what doesnt add up is samsungs "Knox" being out to to protect anything outside of its own personal interest
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] LuigiBull23:
Couldn't agree more.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Macklessdaddy:
Naddict please come on in and shut this 4.3 thread down,remember you need to keep it all in one place:mad:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] PhxDroid86:
I apologize for things getting off topic but for the op to provide so much perspective regaurding the early stages of the 4.3 update is more important than "consolidating" threads
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Macklessdaddy:
No bro I was just messing with the super powerful mod who keeps shutting down any thread that has to do with 4.3

dude is merging every damn thread in sight
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] PhxDroid86:
Im so ready to just root and flash a custom rom on my buddies OTA'd rom but im seriously hoping that Mr. R or Matt L. Can cimetgrough in the clutch to save us all from knox being tripped while engaging in the root process... reseting it is one thing but if we dont have to reset it than that would be ideal... patience is such q virtue at this point
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] thef00l2:
Since this is about Knox -- it includes SE Android as part of it which is from SE Linux --- The key concepts underlying SELinux can be traced to several earlier projects by the United States National Security Agency. With what the NSA has been caught doing recently.... anybody looked at the basecode for their backdoor which is probably in there?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Mynameisbruce:
I tripped my know already. :eek:

Cab i go back 4.1.2?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] youStolemylaptop:
No.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] jmt1985:
From my understanding you can go back to 4.1.2

I saw someone post the instructions in the Galaxy Note 2 community on Google+
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ev1L4o:
I just factory installed stock 4.4.2 + root/cw and noticed this thing. It charges to 21% and does not move... Any ideas ?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] snsmos:
HI, I was on latest stock rom from GIO (Gingerbread 2.3.6 - I guess), and I upgraded to CM7.2 Jelly Bread custom rom (ROM OS Version: 2.3.x Gingerbread / ROM Kernel: Linux 2.6.x). Before I flashed the custom rom I made a (nandroid) Backup with CWM on the stock rom. now I decided to restore back the stock rom,

My question now is: Is it possible to just restore my backup with CWM and I'm back on stock rom? or I need to do something else? or maybe depends on CWM version???

Any Help Please:)

Thanks in Advance
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] DiavoloPowa:
You can restore your stock rom using Odin downloading the Stock 2.3.6
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] kaiserlourdes:
is there a way to restore ur stock rom but not using Odin?
[Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660] Deleted member 5658933:
Maybe this stock-based flashable ROM can help you? Click!