yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
• Hi Dev !!

My ROM " Feel the KitKat v2 " and Kernel 3.4.67 ... and my Battery Drain Power ! and battery are Good See This Small Report :

1- Normal Use > 9 Hours ( GPS off , 3G off , BT off , wi-fi off ) , In Gingerbread Stay 24 and more.

2- Network Use > less 4 Hours ( GPS off , 3G ON , BT off , wi-fi off )

The Screen 50% use battery !! How can i Fix that without change My ROM :o i like it ... and i not like to lose my files.:good: Night
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] miki2o:
All 4.3 and 4.4 ROMs needs more power, so you can't do nothing except putting a new battery with more mAhs
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
THanks :D

Thanks For ROM Mik :D ... and do u have nice Kitkat 4.4 for Wonder !! No errors ?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] makankaki:
i use growlv7 by ipromeh, its 4.3.1

my screen only take 10%
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
Hey !! Do u Have link for that ?! and it's CyanogenMOD ? ... have Kit Kat Theme :D ?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] makankaki:
Here, based on CM10.2

doesn't have kit kat theme.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
RE

Thanks :D ... it's Good ?!
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] makankaki:
see the changelog in there.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] hart.indodroid:
Thanks , and ready go to links now...and I hope really good and more stable :D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
Were ?

I need ROM ... have Kit Kat Theme !! ;)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] makankaki:
maybe you can see Here, its KitKat 4.4 ROM, see the changelog and the comment 1st :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
THanks :D

I See Him ... but i need stable one and no bugs !! i think i will use your ROM.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] makankaki:
if you want no bug, just stick with 2.3 Gingerbread.

just find CM9 or CM10 or CM10.1 its stable already, and some minor bug that dont bother you :)

for CM10.2 and CM11 are still in alpha stage, so the bug are more that CM9~10.1
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] JMourao:
most probably is your battery that its not getting newer, try buy another and you will see you have the same battery life as 2.3.6(worked for me and was not an official one)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
Reply

NO !!! Gingerbread NO !! ... i hate him :D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Luanna:
It shouldn't take up that much charge. I think battery is the problem,.buy a new one. At least you'll have an extra batt. LOL
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] tawfeekamr:
NO!

NO !! u think is wrong !! my battery Good !! :silly:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] nmssyafiq:
try use ringalingav3 it is 4.4 version :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Dhikavolution:
Yeah im agree,mine can stand about 24h+ (standby) with stock battery,but theres still many bug on KK :D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] hinfamous:
Hey guys, there are a new ROM for kitkat already here
[Shield Q&A] Rhokk:
I got the notification to install and I tried. Shield restarted and the little green android guy showed up and it started installing the update. Half way through it showed a red explanation mark with the words "error". I had to hold down the shield+home keys to restart. The shield restarted just fine. I deleted the data in google frameworks (read to do that here) and tried the update again, same outcome.

I'm new to android (came from iphone) and now have a galaxy S4. So I apologize about the noobiness.

My shield is rooted and bootloader unlocked. As far as I know I did not install any custom recovery. I thought that users should be able to install OTA if they are running the stock OS and no custom recoveries. Am I wrong about that? Anyways, I have SuperSU installed along with a few rooted apps. My guess is that I will need to install a custom recovery so I can flash this update, is this correct? I would be very grateful if someone would explain whats going on here =P
[Shield Q&A] aDigitalPhantom:
You should not need a custom recovery for this.

Due to the download size of this update it appears to be an incremental update.

the download size i see is 22.3 MB

You would need to see the exact error to try an figure out more.

UPDATE

Installed fine for me
[Shield Q&A] Gnurou:
Custom recovery is definitely not needed. Root by itself also does not interfere. I updated without trouble.

Maybe try reflashing the boot and system partitions to stock and try the update again?
[Shield Q&A] Rhokk:
a quick how to on reflashing the boot and system would be awesome!!

--edit:nevermind... im trying out Kwonggers program--

ok somehow i softbricked my shield. I've tried Kwonggers program and I've manually flashed recovery,boot, and system and afterwards all I get is the flashing green controller during boot. I know I did it right because all messages were positive.

I also downloaded the most up to date shield files from nvidia (update64) which is extract-nv-recovery-image-shield-01.00.13216_261.5912.sh however I dont know how to use a *sh file.
[Shield Q&A] aDigitalPhantom:
it needs a factory rest.

my suggestion is to re-flash system (again) using the command fastboot -w flash system system.img

the .sh file is for use on Linux, cygwin can probably do that if you have the correct things installed with it.
[Shield Q&A] Rhokk:
Chevyowner you are the best! After reading your suggestion, I tried just the system.img this time and presto! This time it took. Not sure why it didn't take the 2 times I tried it last night.

Thanks for helping newer guys like me. Really appreciate it!
[Shield Q&A] aDigitalPhantom:
glad you got it working
[Shield Q&A] starfriend.y:
hi.

i am a new guy from far far away China, language is the biggist problem.

the same issue, i can't fix it, error in updating ota 65.

how to do? where i can get /system.img/? and how to push the img to my Shield?

except a PC and a cable, i don't have any tools, no software. and i can't get that what you guys talking about. but the same issue.

if you guys can help, i will be very appreciated

if u do know Chinese.....=P
[Shield Q&A] Nikojiro:
Hi, I have the same issue, OTA 64 installed with bootloader unlocked and rooted. Will my data be preserved if I flash only the system image?
[Shield Q&A] starfriend.y:
how can you get the /system image/? thanks
[Shield Q&A] Nikojiro:
Here's how I fixed my system:

Downloaded OTA 65 image from https://developer.nvidia.com/develop4shield

As per instructions (see https://developer.nvidia.com/sites/default/files/akamai/mobile/shield/HowTo-Flash-Recovery-Image_1.txt), flashed only boot, recovery and system images (so it wouldn't wipe your user partition, e.g. apps and data)

Rebooted the unit, waited for the upgrade to complete. Root will be lost if you had it.

Rerooted the unit (see https://github.com/linux-shield/shield-root)

It works perfectly now.
[Shield Q&A] starfriend.y:
thanks for your help.

is that /ota 65 image/ a 1.0GB .sh file? i can't unzip it.

i think that i have to unzip the .sh file with a linux pc.
[Shield Q&A] Nikojiro:
Yes the .sh file is a linux shell script. I can repack it in a standard zip and upload it later today on a share if you want.
[Shield Q&A] Nikojiro:
Ok I uploaded a repacked zip of the OTA 65 images for linux-less people :p

https://mega.co.nz/#!ccRCQTAS!FylQx29ZE7RUvi-kzbwb53woZGRZUu9_RAQNk9_FkMI

Please note that you'll need to have the Android SDK installed, as well as the proper USB driver.
[Shield Q&A] starfriend.y:
thanks a lot! you are so kind!
[Shield Q&A] starfriend.y:
here i come again...

as your guide, i've flash my Shield /recovery.img/ and /boot.img/, they all done. but failed when i flash /system.img/, "FAILED (remote: insufficient memory)"

why?
[Shield Q&A] Nikojiro:
Hi, sorry with so little background information I'm afraid I can't help. I'd recommend a full reflash of your unit.
[Shield Q&A] starfriend.y:
thank you first.

I do as you said, download the file, unzip it, and i got /system.img/, /boot.img/ and /recovery.img/.

i opened cmd and type /fastboot flash system system.img/ and i got failed information: /FAILED (remote: insufficient memory)/

im sure i wipe my shield first, and i flash recovery, boot very well.
[Shield Q&A] alex.mircea0509:
can't update

hello,

I would very much appreciate some real help.

I want to be able to update to 65 WITHOUT loosing my userdata. I very much care for all my settings, software and setup.

I am bootloader unlocked from the very beginning and rooted. I was able to update OTA just fine until this update, and the root back very easily each time afterwards.

I knew that this ($#@@ing) delta update will give me trouble so I made some research first. With no use... I still couldn't update..

What I did:

-> downloaded custom CMW for shield and booted. made a nandroid (again: I very much care for my data and I won't update until and can do it without wiping) - all fine

-> downloaded the extracted image of OTA 65 from this thread, booted into boot loader and did:

fastboot flash recovery recovery.img

- OK

fastboot flash boot boot.img

- OK

fastboot flash system system.img

- insufficient memory crap.. (hoped I won't get it but... :((( )

-> booted back into JB.. booted fine but my SD card storage partition wasn't where file managers read it anymore (it was mounted and OK on /system/storage but just lost some symlink of some sort... no big deal.. I guess it was the new bootloader at fault but since the 65 system image wasn't flashed I guessed it will work again afterwards..)

-> opened supersu, full unrooted, took a leap of fate and tried the delta update OTA... gave me the killed andoid at about 50% :((

-> tried fastboot flash system system.img on another computer.. insufficient memory crap again....

-> so I booted again into CMW and restored my nandroid. Luckily everything worked fine...

So if someone knows how can I go 65 without userdata wipe, please help me!

thank you very much
[Shield Q&A] f2:
Same problem here

Surprise, surprise! .... =(

//cc [MENTION=4260879]Nikojiro[/MENTION]
[Moto X Q&A] shusain93:
So I've been searching around, and some people say that AT&Ts LTE works perfectly, but some say that there is a missing band

But on the CyanogenMod page about the devices, they have the exact same bands:

http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Xt1058_Info

http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Xt1053_Info

So the reason I'm choosing the Tmobile X over the native ATT one is because ATT locked the bootloader, and has ugly logos on the phone, plus bloatware. Unlocked bootloader is the main thing. I'm not getting the developer edition because I really want to customize my phone :P.

So, can SOMEONE confirm if you can use E/3G/4G/LTE on the TMobile Moto X?
[Moto X Q&A] Jimbogiant:
I can confirm that the "T-Mobile" Moto X (XT1053) works 100% on AT&T 3G and LTE. I am using this model on AT&T's GoPhone service without any issues, both 3G HSPA+ and LTE work fine.

It is true that the XT1053 model is "missing" an LTE band (Band 5) -- however, AT&T does NOT use this band in the United States (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LTE_networks#Americas), and the T-Mobile version has Bands 4 and 17 that AT&T uses in the U.S. So, if you're using AT&T in the U.S., the T-Mobile XT1053 model will work fine on LTE.

One thing to keep in mind is that the Moto X's IMEI will not be automatically provisioned by AT&T for LTE access since it's not an AT&T branded phone (AT&T's network assumes that non-AT&T phones are "dumbphones" that only work with HSPA+) -- you'll need to provide them with an IMEI of an AT&T LTE phone to get LTE access. This was confusing to me at first, because when I first activated my Moto X on the AT&T network I only could connect to HSPA+. I eventually had to go to an AT&T store, write down the IMEI of a Galaxy Note 2 floor model (but any LTE phone in the store would work), and give that IMEI to AT&T. After that, LTE worked perfectly.

Hope this helps!

James
[Moto X Q&A] shusain93:
How do I "give' ATT an IMEI? I have an LTE sim from an iPhone 5, and It was the last phone I bought from ATT.

Please don't tell me we are faking IMEIs. Isn't it highly illegal?
[Moto X Q&A] icase81:
I've never had to give them a fake IEMI. I just had to call and give them the one from my phone, and they then added LTE to it.
[Moto X Q&A] shusain93:
So I can take the IMEI from my iPhone (LTE), call AT&T up tell them I have a phone that supports LTE, but it's only getting 3G? What am I supposed to say?
[Moto X Q&A] icase81:
Just call them. Say you aren't getting LTE and want to see what's wrong. They'll ask for the IEMI, and provision it. In a fringe scenario, they'll ask you to goto a store and get a new SIM card, where they'll do the same thing and read the IEMI.
[Moto X Q&A] kzoodroid:
They provisioned mine at the store as I needed a new nano sim card. I had a gophone HSPA+ account with my Nexus 4 and they added the IEMI from the Moto X to my account, changed my plan to an LTE plan and I got LTE on the Moto X. Took 5 minutes.
[Moto X Q&A] Jimbogiant:
No one is "faking" IMEIs or doing anything illegal. I'm sure people's experiences will differ from one store to the next, I'm just telling you what I had to do.

When I first got my Moto X, LTE did not work. I tried calling AT&T's customer support, and they told me my phone was "unsupported by the network," which is a huge pile of BS. So, I went to my local AT&T store and told a rep what was going on. He said "I'll be right back," grabbed a Galaxy Note 2 from a display, and wrote down its IMEI. He punched that into the system and voilá, the Moto X's LTE worked and it's been great ever since.

This was back in September, so maybe AT&T automatically recognizes Moto X IMEIs and provisions them for LTE. If not, just go in to a store and they'll get it figured out for you.

James
[Moto X Q&A] redeyss:
Anybody know if my microcell from atnt will work with the Tmobile version of the moto x?
[Moto X Q&A] shusain93:
Did you account not already have an LTE device on it? I plan on switching my sim from an already LTE device.
[Moto X Q&A] Jimbogiant:
I activated a brand new account with the Moto X, so I didn't already have an LTE device on it like you do. I bet yours will work right out of the gate. I wasn't trying to scare you or imply that your phone wasn't going to work, but I wanted to let you know of the possibility of that happening and what to do if it did happen. Having been in the same situation you will be in (using AT&T on a T-Mobile Moto X), I just wanted you to have all the info.

I'm definitely not the only one to have run into a similar issue: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=45965273&postcount=169 . This was a reply from someone helping me out w/ the LTE issue when I first got the phone in September:
[Moto X Q&A] shusain93:
Thank you everyone! Looks like I'm getting a T-Mobile X.
[Moto X Q&A] redeyss:
I got one today, more worried about it not connecting to my microcell. 32 gb Super stoked!!!
[Moto X Q&A] chirpa12:
Are most of you planning on getting a new nano sim or are you just going to cut yours down from a larger size?

I have an S4 right now which has a micro-sim. So I was thinking of cutting it down to a nano sim. Anyone done this?
[Moto X Q&A] superm1:
I'm a little confused now on this IMEI stuff. I've got a GS3 (i747) on AT&T right now w/ LTE. I've purchased a XT1053 (T-Mobile variant of moto x).

When it comes next week and I go in to get a nano sim card will they give me a hard time because they'll want to register the IMEI of the Moto X and it won't be in their DB?

I also want to sell my i747 on swappa, but swappa you're supposed to unregister any devices from your account first right? So don't I need to remove the IMEI of my i747 from my account and have the Moto X IMEI registered then?
[Moto X Q&A] Jimbogiant:
From the sounds of it, my information from earlier in the thread may be outdated. I had the IMEI issues back in September, but from what I can gather now (and based on my experience with the Nexus 5), I think AT&T's IMEI database has been updated to automatically provision new unlocked phones to LTE.

I would just take your Moto X into an AT&T store when you get it and try it with its own IMEI -- if LTE doesn't work, just ask one of the reps if they have a placeholder LTE-enabled IMEI they could punch in instead, this is what they did for me back in September.

---------- Post added at 07:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 PM ----------

I've cut down a micro SIM to a nano SIM with no problems. AT&T will give you a nano SIM for free if you walk into a store and ask for one though.
[Moto X Q&A] notmilk:
Great info guys. I'm planning to get the T-Mobile Moto X myself to use on AT&T, do I need to unlock the phone? and how do you do that?
[Moto X Q&A] Russell Sprouts:
The T-Mo version is not Sim locked, so you'll be fine. Sounds like you'll need to talk to AT&T to get LTE access, though.
[Moto X Q&A] notmilk:
I already have a Galaxy S3 with LTE enabled, all I need to do is to cut the sim card right? to have LTE on T-Mobile Moto X
[Moto X Q&A] Russell Sprouts:
I'm not sure how that works... Is it really as simple as swapping the Sim card? I just got a T-Mo Moto X to replace the AT&T version I've been using on T-Mo prepaid and I thought I'd at least have to register the new IMEI before I could use it.

EDIT: Well I just successfully swapped my sim into a new T-Mo Moto X and it connected right away to LTE. So that answers that. No need to call or otherwise notify T-Mo. The above discussion suggests it may be more complicated on AT&T, though.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] jmw2207:
Just received a White UAG today.....Thought i'd do a quick comparo with a Slim Armor (Metal Slate) that I've had on for the last few weeks. Don't get me wrong....both these cases are a excellent choice and I'll be swapping between them both. I'll add to this list after a few days of use as well.

UAG over the Slim Armour Case

- Tighter Fit

- More Lightweight

- Grippier Sides (thanks to the Honeycomb Pattern)

- Lip on the front is bigger (more face protection)

- Bigger Hole for the micro USB 3.0

- Bigger Hole for headphone Jacks

- More rugged masculine looking

- Slighly more camera protection (Deeper Groove)

- 1 piece deisgn

- Bigger Hole for IR Blaster

- Least resistant to cosmetically scratch

Slim Armor Over the UAG case

- Classier Sleeker Prossional look

- Cutouts are more professonally done/ finished

- 2 piece design (could be a con)

- Slighly Thinner

- Cheaper (depends where you get it from but in my case it was $6 cheaper)

On Par-

- Tactile Buttons for the Power and Volume are excellent

- Both have "feet" on the back to protect the case

- Both excellent designs and looks

- Both I think could take a fairly big hit or drop and do the job intended

- Both go very well with a Glass.t tempered screen protector
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] Kawaisa:
I feel that the SA has significantly worse tactile feedback for the power button. The SA power button is more recessed and mushy. The SA also has a crappy cutout for the headphone port, most earbuds won't fit unless the plug is skinny like on the samsung headset. The UAG opening practically fits every 3.5mm plug I've tried.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] Hash123:
we hope to see some great pics if it possiple
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] mikemq2003:
Man that is a tuff choice. Cant wait to see some pics soon. Love they way both look.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] boglehead:
Thanks for the pics. The UAG is bulkier but lighter?

Also, is the Slim Armor Metal Slate the only non-glossy/shiny color? Looks good.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] jmw2207:
Yeah the UAG is a fair bit lighter. Its weird that the UAG is that much thicker because when its on the phone you'd think the slim armor is bulkier.

I think the slate is the only not glossy one of that series. ..that was one of the reasons why I got that color.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] jmw2207:
I can confirm that after nearly a weeks use.... I believe the UAG case is more of a keeper than the slim armor.....it just feels better on the phone. The lightweight construction is a massive plus. The Grippier sides and the better designed face lip are all a bigger advantage. I'm extremely impressed by this case.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] jsdecker10:
Where did you order your UAG case? How much did it cost? ...and how quick were they with the shipping?
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] 03redgti:
http://www.amazon.com/URBAN-ARMOR-GEAR-Samsung-Galaxy/dp/B008EPW1MI
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] jmw2207:
http://www.urbanarmorgear.com/products/navigator-glxn3

from here.....comes with free shipping. probably took 10 or so business days from order to delivery...and that was to Australia....quicker to US i'd imagine?
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] Schizoprenia:
SlimArmor FTW
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] fuleng66:
UAG Worth its money

I got my white UAG case along with my white GN3. Although i tried no other case on it, i have to say i'm impressed by its looks and construction. The case is stunnigly use friendly and the added bulk is beneficial to have a steady grip in the little monster (at least for my hands). The one piece hybrid design is better than i thought since the rubber part is sturdier and less of a dirt sweep than a 2 piece (had otterbox in my hd2 and casemate in my gn1 with the latter being a total disappointment).

On the plus side if you favor cases that draw attension uag will pimp your gn3 like no other. Most of my tecnology illiterate friend notice the case before the phone.

Finally i can confirm that UAG has free shipping with their cases and the delivery time was about 8 days for me.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] boglehead:
What about the issue with the missing cutout for the temp/humidity sensor (whatever that is)? Has there been a v2 which fixed it?
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] jmw2207:
No issue now with the cut out. ...they fixed it a few weeks back.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] austreaker:
are you able to tell me which one can connect to the multimedia dock without removing the case?

currently using the PDAIR booktype slim case and it fit on the multimedia dock but the top two side plastic is crack and about to break soon.

I am on a market for a new case that fit on the multimedia dock. Currently thinking of buying the Seidio Surface case as it looks like it can fit the dock and has a kickback stand.

Can someone confirm for me
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] soyusa:
I believed you have provided the wrong link, that is for S3 and not Note 3.

The correct URL is http://www.amazon.com/URBAN-ARMOR-GEAR-Samsung-Galaxy/dp/B00F8JEVS0 :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] mobile-freak:
One question.

Which one has better grip in your hands?

EDIT:

Does it slide smooth in and out off your pocket or is it laggy?

Gesendet von meinem SM-N9005 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] KingFinger:
Outlander UAG +1.

Sent from above.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] jmw2207:
The UAG has better grip in you hand. Both cases are very easy in and out of pockets
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] mark324:
So from what I read samsung knox is coming to 4.3..I have a rogers on 4.2.2 and looking at the application manager I see an app called samsung knox and knox store..what are these for?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] mark324:
Does that mean I have knox..I'm rooted though and have installed other roms
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Whizzpopper:
What I discovered today (first day with S4) is that if you freeze Knox, the open lock and "custom" caption - which appear after rooting - on the boot screen disappear. I have no idea what Knox is for.... I can't believe how much bloat there is on this phone!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] scott14719:
More than likely, the custom lock on your screen is appearing or disappearing randomly and has nothing to do with KNOX. It probably just changed because you did 'something" to your phone. SysScope is the process that determines the result of the scan to be custom or official. Your phone might stay the way it is now, or it might revert back at some point to custom. Search for sysscope if you want to learn more about it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Whizzpopper:
Thanks. I was just reading about knox. Loads of info out there OP, in case you're interested. It seemed like a pretty consistent response. - freeze the two knox apps and the lock disappears, unfreeze and the lock reappears. I'll have a look at SysScope....