yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 3 General] xclub_101:
Actually you can "Send" the Action Note (from the list view) to a number of destinations, including S Note (where it remains as a separate thing but still is a start).
[Galaxy Note 3 General] BarneyL:
I didn't know that. Not ideal as it converts the note to an image but better than nothing.

So far my preferred method is sending the action note to the browser and then copying it back out from the search box.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] brooon:
Thank you all for your inputs!

You are right - it is just usable with TouchWiz and it is just ONE note, the S-Note Widget is usable with all launchers and you can get an overview about all your notes. My bad, but as everywhere --> it is inconsistent :p

You see, that´s the point: You were able to use S-Note for quick memos with the Note 2 as well - the S-Note popup was PERFECT for these kinds of notes! Why should Action memo be better in any ways? I don´t think that there is a "pro" here (just IMAO).

This is how I used S-Note with my Note 2: Quite a big number of notebooks like "ToDo", "groceries", "university", "important", "ideas" etc. (keep the folder function in mind as well), most of them placed on the desktop either as widget or as shortcut. It was just nice - optimized with the action memo functions it would have been just perfect ;)

Yeah, well, S-Note was perfect for "post it notes" as well (S-Note popup ;)) - in the end it should be the user who decides if he/she wants to write a short note (blank sheet) or e.g. to develop a more complex mindmap or something...do you really need two seperate programs for that?!

You are absolutely right, a great implementation!! :highfive:

The first two points are going in line with what I mean. Action memo is just too simple in its functions to justify the "second app thing", as there already is such a mighty tool like S-Note.

Absolutely correct, I totally forgot to mention scrapbook - which I hardly use at all for the same reasons. Good idea - but why not just include it in S-Note? It is just an additional function - but here we go, a third app (?!).

You see - "still a start" - it looks to me as they just collected some ideas and coded an app for each of them^^ :eek: This is not well-conceived, it is just a collection of ideas in different apps.

Yeah, and it would have been so easy to think about such tasks beforehand. The Note is one of samsungs premium devices ("the" premium device?) - don´t lynch me, but at this point samsung should take apple as an example.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] HikariWS:
Action Memo can quiuckly export the memo to Evernote, in a new note that can be freely editted.

S Note creates EN notes for its notes, but they have only a blob pic and no changes can be done to that note.

For me, S Note is junk. EN isn't as pretty, but is WAY more functional. I can create notes on any PC and read and edit them on my phone, and vise-versa. S Note ignores notes that weren't created by it and its notes can't be edited anywhere else.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] jetbruceli:
I use sketch book for galaxy. It's much better for hand writing and it works with cyanogenmod too. I bought it from Sammy hub awhile ago when they gave us free credit.

dont forget the thanks button if I helped out!!
[Galaxy Note 3 General] brooon:
Yeah, well, Sketchbook is known as one of the best DRAWING apps, but as a note taking tool? Hmm,...

No sync, no nice gallery (yeah there is a gallery, but...)...
[Galaxy Note 3 General] ricnar456:
one only widget

action memo can put one only widget in the desktop, but you can browse all notes in the same widget swiping up with the pen.

ricnar
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Adon A:
There is solution buddy and is the following.

On Note 2, after detaching the pen the simple Memo appears. On the left upper corner there is an arrow. By clicking on that arrow, it opens the full featured S Note.

On Note 3, when pen is detached and simple memo appears, just click on the right bottom site, where it writes an "s". Then again the full featured S-Nite page will appear.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Adon A:
There is solution buddy and is the following.

On Note 2, after detaching the pen the simple Memo appears. On the left upper corner there is an arrow. By clicking on that arrow, it opens the full featured S Note.

On Note 3, when pen is detached and simple memo appears, just click on the right bottom site, where it writes an "s". Then again the full featured S-Note page will appear.

---------- Post added at 11:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 AM ----------

There is solution buddy and is the following.

On Note 2, after detaching the pen the simple Memo appears. On the left upper corner there is an arrow. By clicking on that arrow, it opens the full featured S Note.

On Note 3, when pen is detached and simple memo appears, just click on the right bottom site, where it writes an "s". Then again the full featured S-Note page will appear.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mistertac:
I'm on stock firmware MJ7 rooted and want to change my dpi settings. I've done this before on various roms, but want to ask what app should I use and is it safe?

Just don't want to end up in a bootloop or something so any help would be appreciated.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Bradh024:
Just install xposed framework and download the dpi mod in xposed download tab.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mistertac:
Alright I have xposed too so I'll try that, I just wanted to check on here and see what people were using.

My last phone I had issues with doing this and since I'm not running a custom recovery or anything, I wanted to be sure first. Thanks though I'll give that a try.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Bradh024:
Thats what I plan on doing when I get mine here un a couple days
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mistertac:
The one on xposed is per app dpi. Which is still cool, but I was looking for setting the system itself. Wish I didn't have this jacked up bootloader so I could just run paranoid Android or another rom and I'd have all these options built in. This is the first time I've run xposed on a phone and first time looking into an app or module for dpi settings so... I'll search and see what else I can find. Again just want to do it safely. I know I could just grab some app and hope for the best but wanted some feedback first that's all.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Bradh024:
Try changing the android system file and see what that does
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mistertac:
That does work. You have to do a reboot then it looks good. .All except the keyboard. It's huge. So I apparently I'll have to fiddle with swiftkeys dpi settings to see if I can scale it down to look normal. Not sure why the keyboard didn't take the settings like everything else did after I changed "Android system"

Also. .. Samsung keyboard looked the same. .huuuge
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mistertac:
Well I use nova and for now I just changed novas dpi and get the same results and my keyboard is all good too. Maybe I was just overlooking something but I tried changing both Samsung and SwiftKey dpi settings after I did Android system and nothing seemed to help, either to big or way too small.

For now this works.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Bradh024:
Good deal, I'm pretty sure there are other mods out there that'll change the dpi also. Might want to try them out.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Craleb:
I know I'm way late at responding here. But what dpi do you personally use? I remeber on my note 2 I would use 160 to 175 but It had a bigger screen.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mistertac:
I'm using 400 myself and looks awesome to me.

Verizon Galaxy S4

SafeStrap 3.71

Hyperdrive 12
[Samsung Galaxy Mega] Warnahly:
hey guys so i flashed the stock new base i9200 XXUBMJ4 via pc odin downloaded from sammobile

after flashing its like the internel storage is not detected i open cam and it says insert memory

i open my files and it says no files in internel storage

i go to rom toolbox >> storage and the sd card (not externel ) is not even showing

so i went to CWM formatted internal but still no answer

any one has an answer ?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mhofert:
I use the Complete Linux Installer app to install Ubuntu on Android 4.4 (Nexus 5). The problem is that I can barely do anything with Ubuntu since the file system is completely contained within the .img file and thus (per default) limited to 4 GB. According to Zachary Powell (developer of Complete Linux Installer), an option is to create an ext4 partition and install Ubuntu there. I found many instructions on how to do that on an *external* sd card. However, the Nexus 5 does not have an external sd card. I am thus wondering how one could create an ext4 partition? (The phone is rooted. Ideally, the procedure does not require to be an Android hacker for too long...)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jdbeitz:
There might be a way to do that.. Not sure. But I can tell you that's a very dangerous thing to do. That's how people end up with bricked phones. I guess ODIN used to repartition the phone but I'm not sure if it exists for the n5. I'd say beware and be careful....
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] simms22:
odin is only for samsung devices. and i wouldnt partition the nand storage, or youll be trying to replace your phone.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jdbeitz:
What he said
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mhofert:
Okay, thanks, that's good to know. I was also wondering about how 'dangerous' this is and it seems like 'very dangerous', so that's not an option (at the moment). I hope at one point they realize what potential a smartphone could have if they'd make it more like a real computer... (with Ubuntu's 'convergence' concept, my hope was that this happens 'sooner' than 'later', but apparently it's not the right time yet, at least not for medium-skilled hackers).
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] n_vincent:
Hello,

I"m currently running activesync 3.8, is there any advantage to go to the last version 4.1 or does 4.1 is only for WM5 ?

Thanks in advance for your advise
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] Artosoft:
I am not sure about the advantages, but I only want the latest version. Tried v4.1 for more than 3 months and works perfect for me.

Regards,

Arto.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] mike_kameka:
Hey guys been stressing for 3 days with my wife's phone. She got the ota to 4.3 and everything seemed fine

until she rebooted the phone. Now any sim i put in says unregistered sim and cant connect. Strange thing is it says there is new voice mail which to me means it is connecting to the network. I've reverted back to factory 4.11 and same problem. But it's still on 4.3 bootloader and Knox is tripped. And since there is no way to revert i317m bootloader like 317 i can't fully go back. I did the free sim unlock and wonder if that could be the problem with it reading the sim cards? Is it like a code unlock? She's freaking and I'm so stressed. Any way to test if phone is reading sim? I'm sure this is software related because it doesn't say no sim and tells me there is new voice mail.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wallyg8r:
Not sure it would help but I would try reapplying the 4.3 update via Odin. You can find the update on Sammobile.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] mike_kameka:
ok so I did the update again but threw odin this time and still not working. but there is a difference, when I try to select my network from the list it site for a while and says unable to connect, try again later.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] 210euser:
Try getting a new sim card.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] mike_kameka:
ok so ive run the service menu and gone to sim information, qmi uim status and I see a problem vs my note 2. under app_state illegal ? it states yes on her device. what does this mean?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] mike_kameka:
Tried to flash other modems and it fails in Oden and phone says unsupported. I think Knox is stopping me from changing modem file. Anyone know how I can get passed Knox?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] 210euser:
Flash a custom rom without Knox
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] stynk:
Question

I´m having the same problem, any solution?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] markey97:
Hey Guys and Girls!

I own this device since quite a short time and i wanted to ask if any developer is willing to port the 3.4.x kernel to our S3 i9300, since it would bring us some big performance, stability and security enhancements since we are stuck at 3.0.101. We would really profit of this as its much more actual and better for coming upgrades. Please correct me if there are already some devs trying to port this or if anything else is wrong.

My previous device was/is the Samsung Galaxy S Plus and we got a 3.4.x kernel that runs very well and gave us some big improvements. We officially only got Android 2.3.6 with a 2.6.x kernel and our great devs managed to found a dev team and to bring us a fully working 3.0.x and 3.4.x kernel and Android 4.0 to latest 4.4.

I could provide some github repositories and some more additional info if needed, just PM me if you want to start on this. I can't code or compile that much but i could provide nearly everything you need in my opinion.

Greets,

markey97

Edit: I can try to port this on my own but i think that i most likely need YOUR help. Just to have that said

Edit2: I mean the international S3 i9300

Edit3: Changed title

Edit4: Base for the kernel is there! Developement will start slowly in the following days/weeks and source will be pushed to github in some time.

Edit5: I will port this on my own, if anyone wants/ is willing to help me, PM me. I will show you my detailed progress here and will maybe give an ETA, but if i don't, don't ask for it since i also have private live, and i will code and provide you with info when I'm free and when i want to.

Feel free to post feature requests/suggestions over here in the thread!!
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
are you talking about the S3 LTE phone? the one that has an exynos4 cpu? I'm definitely interested in this! I've been looking and trying to port over a 3.4.x+ kernel since the 3.0.101 is at EOL.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] markey97:
Thats exactly the way i think about it, we need a more actual kernel on our devices, not just a newer Android version to stay on the safe side, but i a also have to disappoint you, because i meant the i9300. But we could definitely together try to port it also to the i9305 which you meant, right?

Greets,

markey97
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
yeah, sorry, in actually running the t0ltevzw (Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 2). same processor, just clocked a tad higher. i looked at the sgs+ and saw it's running a Qualcomm cpu, so it may be harder to implement what the devs of the sgs+ put into affect, but I'm ready to learn and hack my way around.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] nonyhaha:
Could anyone be so kind to enlighten me why this thread about "i9300" appeares in every note 2 forum on xda? each time i want to jump straight to i9300 it gets me first through all the note 2 forums. this is kind of silly.

am i the only one getting to see this thread in the note 2 forums?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
because this is the s3/note developer only forums.

edit: this get left in the dark?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] markey97:
You mean if this thread is dead or the project abandoned?

No its not, i just don't have enough time to work on this till Christmas (school..arggh:mad:) but then i will try to port it in a time span of 2 weeks or so. Lol.

I'm searching for the source base and what I need to port it and then I will start when my holidays start. Yeeeah!:victory::cool:

Greets:highfive:,

markey97
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Ricky Divjakovski:
deleted.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] GR0S:
How are going to run propietary libs designed for 3.0 on 3.4?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] DerTeufel1980:
There aren't any

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7105 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] arj03:
How is this coming along, I could be interested at looking into this maybe :)
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
i definitely second this!
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] blackcat67:
galaxy s3 neo i9300i use 3.4x kernel and cpu exynos 4412

http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=i9300i
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Sepp-Wurzel:
The S Plus has the 3.4 Kernel for a long time now:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2165341
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] markey97:
That looks promising, big thanks for that info :highfive:

If that's real that it is a 3.4 kernel, our work could get a lot more easier. Downloading the code atm and will check it and report it. And if its 3.4, I will directly start to (try to) "port" it over so that we can have 3.4 kernel by the end of the next week! :thumbsup:
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
The devil kernel for the Note 2 variants has more of a "pseudo-" 3.4.x kernel. DerTeufel has implemented it, but not fully nor do I know if he's going to try to implement it fully.

The only thing that kills the Note 2 variants is that the s3 is OC'd at 1.2GHz while the Note 2 is OC'd at 1.6. but I'll have to check out the above file and see what I can do and possibly change to match the Note 2s.

Or if anyone knows of a device that has the exact same specs as the N710x and has a 3.4 kernel, PM me and I'll respond accordingly!

thanks!
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] markey97:
Haha I know that, I'm working together with him ;)

He ported over a whole bunch of "features/updates" from the original 3.4 Kernel and he/we mostlikely want(s) to fully implement everything.

That's no problem at all 'cause DerTeufel will/can easily adapt it to the corresponding device. And the S3's (i9300) standard clock speed is 1.4 GHz ;)

Elsewhere I think all other components are (nearly) the same.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
yeah, with the i9300 international version of the S3, I believe we've got the same CPU, maybe same RAM [but I'm thinking the ram on the i9300 is 1.5GB while on the Note 2 it's 2GB]. idk, I'm going to download the neo source code and check it out later since i'm about to leave to go to work.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] psndna88:
s3 has 1 gb ram with exynos 4 soc

s3 neo has 1.5 gb ram with qualcomm soc

Sent from F2FS FORMATED I9300XXUGNB6 NeatROM v7.2 + AGNi pureSTOCK v3.6 kernel
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
which all together = no 3.4 love for the Note 2 :( damn you samsung! why can't you give us some love! lol.

needless to say though, I'm glad to see that DerTeufel has been able to pseudo-implement the 3.4 kernel into his source. I'm also grateful for our kernel love that awesome devs give us. :)
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] blackcat67:
3.4x kernel source

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2735978

https://github.com/cnexus/kernel_d2spr_tw_44/tree/master

Sprint galaxy s3.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
the only problem with the Sprint S3 kernel source is that it's CPU isn't exynos, it's using a Qualcomm Snapdragon. the only S3 that is using the same CPU as the Note 2 variants is the i9300 and the i9305 (which seems to match the Note 2 perfectly)

thanks though, hopefully we can use some of that in our own source to bring a true badass 3.4 linux kernel! or wait till samsung decides to update the Note 2 & others to 3.4 with the 4.4 update....
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] XeLLaR*:
Hey Markey,

Nice to meet you here again. Ive got myself a i9300 after my Xperia Z and Nexus 4 have been destroyed. I highly doubt you can port the 3.4 Kernel for a device like this. We barely managed to port the 3.4 Kernel for the S+, because it had a Snapdragon S2 msm7x30 CPU which was very common and had alot of sources available. Also CAF helped us out alot with their sources.

Exynos is a bit messed up because there arent sources, good enough to start with. You basically have to take a kernel from a similar device and try to start from there.

Gz

X
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Sepp-Wurzel:
Hey Xellar,

Great to see you in the S3 scene. You and DevCon did a great job on the S+.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Cocolopes:
Everything its posible.. [MENTION=4641721]krystianp[/MENTION] and other devs allmost port 3.x.x kernel to the atrix...and they made it from scratch with out any sources from motorola...I know its a hard work...but we have faith in the devs...;)

I read that samsung release kitkat kernel sources for s3 i9300...maybe that could help...

Saludos
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ztotherad:
honestly it wouldnt hurt to look at the sources real super quick.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] DerTeufel1980:
There are kernel sources provided by Motorola. They ported it to 3.1. That's basically the same thing as discussed here

Gesendet von meinem T0LTE mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] xda_Noob.:
Maybe [MENTION=3044346]arco68[/MENTION] can help us. He ported 3.4 kernel to my old phone Galaxy W
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Sepp-Wurzel:
These are similar sources to the S+, which do not fit to the S3
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] XeLLaR*:
Why? He doesnt even have a int. S3. Its not as easy as porting a kernel to the S+.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] xda_Noob.:
Maybe He can give us tips or sp
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] jonttuv:
I hope to be wrong, but is this project abandoned?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Cancar96:
Well judging by last comment which was in may,I would say yes but I remember seeing in archi kernel thread that one of his future plans was building 3.4 kernel.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ilanvachtel:
Hello EveryBody,

AnyOne Know How Can I Backup the arrangment folders of the apps i The App Drawer?

its soo frustrated to arrange the folder all over again everytime i flash a new rom ??

Thanks A head Ilan
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Mickeylittle:
I have never rooted and am scared to do so but I really want and need the ability to use more apps in the multi-window setting. Is there a simple/basic root for me as I don't really care about any other features that rooting brings to the table?

Google is my friend. I'm rooted now and Multi window is as it should be.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] vincey2kr1:
Got any good links. Bout to root as well
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Mickeylittle:
Here you go.... http://howtorootmobile.com/root-galaxy-note-10-1-2014-edition-step-step-working-guide/
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] swaggerjacker:
Did you have to install Esposed?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Mickeylittle:
Never heard of Esposed so no I didn't.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] benni_1994:
I guess He means "Xposed Framework" :P
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) General] Mickeylittle:
Sorry, like I said I'm a total rookie at rooting a device and most of the threads I've seen just don't make sense to me. In fact it took a little while for me to figure out how to even extract the files needed to root the device. I ended up downloading an extraction program to my PC. It was free and did a great job!