yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
Can you finally start using the search function. There's everyday a question from you that has been answered dozens of times already.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
Download Soundhound its the same thing really good app:good:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] MasterJam882:
Anyone here to confirm this bug on R5?

It's important as it affects the ability to switch to ART
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] MattyDip:
I installed XPOSED framework and now I have the toogle to record the screen I think. But were can I fin the recorded videos? Thanks
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alinghi100:
As probably you know search function is bugged in this forum so please, shut up :D

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505G utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
I wonder why it works for me then. And mind your language.

You're just lazy as hell nothing more.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] libb:
If it is everday question mayby it is the right time to fix it? I assume it is not Android 4.4.2 or the application's issue but just this ROM issue because on CM11 is Shazam working well.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
Fix it if you're that clever. And you probably assume wrong because it isn't working on any aosp rom.

And even if it would be a rom issue it's not an excuse to not use the search function.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] gadgetuk99:
I use android tapatalk and I've searched it comes up with the posts but when you select one it just goes to the end of the posts...so it doesn't work I agree..
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
It has nothing to do with the forum. Go to your browser if tapatalk has a bug.

By the way. You can see the answer on the preview and wouldn't have to jump to the post.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] gadgetuk99:
I didn't say it was the forum,I just said it's tapatalk android version...I know I have had to use the browser instead to search and find what I wanted...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Crimsonsky360:
Hi Jamal,Wanna ask something.why i has problem with keyboard phone when i connect with galaxy gear?Swiftkey and Google Keyboard cant use
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] jasongohjr:
Semi fixed

Well r5 with latest alucard pL fixed the issue of phone being stucked in boot animation.

However the screen would still be frozen when the phone is being charged while its off.

A simple reboot without the charging cable did the trick....

At least its usable now... ^^ :svetius:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
I know but he said it but didn't even try to use search from tapatalk or the browser. Wouldn't have said something if I wouldn't read those questions everyday from him.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] gadgetuk99:
Got to agree with you there...same question been asked far too many times there's no fix, ok it works with the new Sammy Rom and cm11 but it don't with Google play edition..nothing the devs can do about that..it's either Google or shazam will have to find a fix...I would understand if there was nothing else to use, but we have soundhound and that works fine..
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] libb:
I did not tell something about searching. When I had the issue I searched and found that it is Shazam issue so I was surprised when it was working on CM. I just say that if is there any issue which is often asked somebody who is clever should try to fix it. I'm not clever, I just sent donation to jamal, I cannot do more else sent money and help to describe the issue and send logs etc. Said is that I asked sometimes in forum or OM to jamal about another issue and nobody answered to me. About easy things like installing xposed etc. are a lot of answers but when somebody asked for something more complex is answer just "fix it yourself when you are so clever". Great!

P.S. Sorry for my english
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] kage00:
Can someone please upload the build.prop from this rom?

I'm trying to get the Touchwiz 4.4.2 leak to work on old bootloader but the wifi isn't working, I'm hoping some wifi settings from the GE 4.4.2 build.prop will help.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] harelp:
yah ,you rigth,now i make cicle and i will see if have some change for got or not and i will report
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] DLAddict:
Coming from R4, is it OK to backup user data using Titanium Backup,

then do a full wipe, and restore user data after installing R5?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
I said that because there's a reason nobody fixed it until now.

If you say "isn't it time to fix it" it sounds like it's easy for you. If it would be easy somebody would have done it already so your post saying that it's time to fix this was just stupid.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] kage00:
anyone? Please I can't download this rom because the link is down, all I need is the build.prop in /system/

Any help would be greatly appreciated
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] libb:
This could be my poor english, I would to say: it should be fixed if it is a issue for a lot of people.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] mhdsanto85:
Not confirmed. Here its ok
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] vivmar:
Need a mirror..link not working...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alinghi100:
I didn't know it was a tapatalk problem instead of a forum problem but hey.. What do you have against me? I suppose that everyone can wrong... Why not me? Please, don't be so aggressive, bye :)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505G utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] jasongohjr:
Art is working

R5 is probably working the best for me. Thanks to Jamal!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Madlisboa:
Can't download...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
https://mega.co.nz/#!x98SmKTb!YJgzjC6gl7lMTYfm_f2M89ImWzDnHvuO-nnG-uS5ZKg
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] mhdsanto85:
this is from R4, just remove .txt.

hope it helps.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Crimsonsky360:
Problem Solve
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] htmltiger:
Home button to answer call

Hi,

Is it possible to answer an incoming call using hardware button with this rom?

In Touchwiz rom it is usually under accessibility settings but in this rom I could only find power button to end call feature.

Thanks.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] DroidRevenge:
retry
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alucard_24:
Calibrate your proximity sensor and it will work.... I think you should fix also your rom, because it never stucked in boot animation before :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Puky70:
Can you tell us how to calibrate proximity sensor?

Thx in advance
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Orange213:
The new installer looks very nice. Btw guys which kernel do you recommend?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] MattyDip:
I didn't notice any significant battery drain on V. 4 but the battery drains much faster than on Android 4.3 stock Touchwiz. Is that normal? What can I do to improve battery life? Thanks.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
Kt>better performance but less battery

Alu>better battery lower performance

I like more Kt because we all have chargers :laugh:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
sure? give me your points on antutu with KT..:D
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
28978
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
the screenshot..i mean..
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
I can give you 32000 on antutu and the phone still isn't faster on everyday use.

These stupid numbers don't matter.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
hey, i mean no need say the false for new users that come and ask on the forum, i take 28659 on alu last kernel with amazing battery and I'm not the only one, and you try to stay quiet with the words because in this thread you too made a so stupid question before but I never advised it...so quiet

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:54 PM ----------

they are both a good kernels
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
What are you talking about? I didn't understand anything you tried to say. Say the false? Nothing I said was wrong here.

You couldn't even say if a kernel would score 19000 or 29000 without running the benchmark because you can't feel the difference.

On my daily setup I have 22000 and it's still more snappy than alu on stock settings where the number would be higher.

So tell me what do you have from these 29000?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] vagaBond07:
These two kernels are both great, it depends on the user which they prefer, Power or Performance. If only we can get both. :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
the kernels are both fast, everybody have different points and speeds, this test are different from device to device, no need say this is more fast this other is most fast, people need make test alone and try both alone, but is not true kt is more fast than alu, this i mean and I'm sorry for what I wrote for your post, I've wrong I understood that you said that I make a stupid post, so now I will delete a part for my post :thumbup::thumbup:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] MattyDip:
Thanks and how can I regulate the vibration intensity now when I'm not able to use KT Tweaker?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
Man You say there's no need to say one is faster than the other and in the next sentence you do it yourself.

I never said one is faster, I said these numbers from benchmarks are crap and don't tell you which kernel is better even if one has 10000 points more than the other.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] simonbigwave:
Agree.. if Jamal got a dollar everytime someone asked about Shazam.... again.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
Yes this i mean for what nike26 says when I ask his points, i want say that is not true that kt is more fast than alu. everything ok
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
And what you say is wrong.

Alu kernel is not faster in everyday use than kt.

The points don't matter.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
Why cant you use KT Tweaker?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] MattyDip:
Because I installed the other kernel for more battery life.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
ok people this are points of view, everybody have different fast with different kernel, I've tried both and for me and many people alu kernel is more fast, for other kt is more fast...but this can change from device to device, so never say this kernel is more fast than other, this is what I think.

---------- Post added at 02:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:28 PM ----------

delete

---------- Post added at 02:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:29 PM ----------

delete

---------- Post added at 02:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:30 PM ----------

delete
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
ST tweaker is for Alu, check if it has the setting.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
delete
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alucard_24:
So have you tried every settings possible? have you configured my kernel using stweaks? it doesn't make sense what are you saying...

Please, learn more about kernel and parameters before saying silly things.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
This is what I think when I compare Kt vs Alu. I have tried them both and I only speak for me not for the Forum.

This is the same thing when you compare Samsung vs Iphone. Somebody likes the other one and somebody the other.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
Why doesn't it make sense? Because I don't trust in benchmarks or because yours didn't win?

I first used both on stock and then both with configured settings and for me kt was more snappy in everyday use. Additionally he uses everything from the actual sources without merging jb stuff in.

And now please explain why it doesn't make sense what I said.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alucard_24:
I think that they are great, but before comparing two things i think you have to know all about both, right?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
ok, stop we spam the thread, every users will use the kernel what they want, both are good kernels!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alucard_24:
Because before saying what is better between both, you should know all about both.... So I just asked: what do you know about my kernel?

KT uses everything from the actual sources, sure?..... There is no official i9505 kernel for KK , and ML4 kernel(I9505G) is not good for us..... so it doesn't make sense what you have said and anyway my kernel is based on CM11 official (NOT JB).

Additionally, which settings do you have changed on stweaks for comparing?

PS. You can choose what kernel you prefer, but don't say silly things, please!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Madlisboa:
When i go to the battery stats,there dont show "screen" someone know why?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Jmldsilva:
Alucard: 28666
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
I know that we have no source for a official kk kernel for our device. And why are ml4 sources not good for us? Because you couldn't get rid of rr with them? What do you think I should know about your kernel that isn't written on your thread that makes me not able to compare both kernels for my usage behaviors?

I changed the same things on both kernels. Doesn't matter which all those were but I know what each setting does before I change it.

You still weren't able to tell me one reason I shouldn't be able to judge and give my personal opinion. You could also explain what doesn't make sense in your opinion.

You are just making theses without any explanation.

I'm a software developer myself and earn my money with it. It's not kernel development but feel free to give a technical explanation of the theses that you made. I think I'll have enough knowledge to understand them.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Crimsonsky360:
You sure flash modem UFNA1 make more stable?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
if u don't have problems with your no need change
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Crimsonsky360:
Errr..what the problem can tell?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alucard_24:
Because it is not stable, and for removing RR problem you have to patch many things so you don't have original kernel.

Anyway, You said "KT kernel is more snappy than ALU".. you didn't give a techical explanation, right? You didn't know that my kernel is based on CM11 and not JB etc .......

I said "Before comparing two things you should know about both", and I think you don't have knowledge to make a good compare, so your opinion it is just an opinion said from who superficially approach to play with kernel.

I made a technical explanation about parameters on my stweaks program, so if you want more speed you can change what you think it is good for you.....

PS. you: "I changed the same things on both kernels".

me: We have so few parmaters in common........

That's all

Bye
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
on LTE or 3g connection I mean, if you don't have issue on it no need change your modem
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Crimsonsky360:
ok thx alot :good:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
You still didn't give a technical explanation why ml4 sources are not good.

Yes good if you use cm11 now but you had jb in earlier. And it's not stable? It's more stable for me and a lot of others than your kernel. No rr no hiccups, No problems with wifi or anything else. But it's not stable, I see...

I don't have the knowledge? Then tell me what I need to know. Already said that in my last post. You also should add it to your thread if you think one can't judge what kernel runs better on his own phone.

I know what the parameters are about and if I change them to match my needs kt is still faster for me and has less hiccups.

If I say that I changed the same stuff I mean that I undervolted on both for the same amount, I used the same scheduler, same min/max, same screen off MHz and tweaked the governor adjustments so they fit my usage needs.

I'm out of this discussion now if your only argument is that I don't have the knowledge to judge what runs better on my phone.

And my general knowledge about developing probably is way bigger than yours. You can't even give a technical explanation why ml4 sources are bad or tell me why your approach should be better.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] mhdsanto85:
For me faux kernel has the best snappy experience....

It would be perfect to have both, faux performance with alu battery life.! but its not possible, at least, with my knowledge. And mine knowledge is limited to install the kernel and only this... I dont spend time setting paramenters. A average user like me, just want a fluid experience combined to a satisfactory battery life, (that in my case, 4 hours of screen is very good). Number in benchmark are crap for me too, I prefer to feel the performance while using the phone normally....

So.... It would be nice to have someone sharing a good performance profile for alu kernel, this way, the comparison must be fair enough.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Swiperaja:
Wipe needed from R3 to R5?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] ntnlzr:
guys stop it, just open a thread in general and speak free about kernels:this is not the right place. Respect Jamal work.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] invano:
Speaking about Camera app...I see that autofocus and touchtofocus is not enabled in HDR mode (known issue) but also for Video recording (?!)

Is it a stock ge feauture or a bug?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] simonbigwave:
you took the words out of my mouth...agreed. Lets all calm down guys and "agree to disagree" - agree its jus personal preference on kernel, and Jamal has already v.kindly provided those 2 kernel options, no?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] larsjuh1987:
adb wifi

Hmm i can't get adb wifi working anymore..

I use wifi ADB (from the playstore), but whenever i try to connect i get the message "unable to connect to xx.xx.xx.xx:5555"

Im 100% sure my IP address is right etc, is it something in the google rom ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Crimsonsky360:
no need
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alucard_24:
Please, stop to say silly things....

1) the simple answer is "if it was good, stable it would work without any modifications". I don't waste my time explaining something you can't understand now.

2) Make a kernel and then speak.

3) My kernel it never based on JB. (In the past it was based on wip-ml4). It is long time that I used CM11 Official. You are not so informed and maybe you compared them long time ago.

4) Kernel has no RR problem, wifi works and also other things, ask to Jamal before saying silly things again.

5) People can judge, but for judging correctly they need to know about all arguments otherwise they could be treated as "silly children".

Bye
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
Still no answer.

1. Words of a real dev. It doesn't work out of the box throw it away.

2. This has nothing to do with the things we talked about.

3. I didn't say it was based on it but you merged stuff in from it which was not long ago.

4. I didn't say it has any of this problems. All I said was that kt works without problems so the ml4 source can't be that bad.

5. Yes I studied this thing 5 years and worked another 3 making applications and drivers in c, c++, c#, Java, different automation platforms, databases and Unix systems but I don't have the knowledge to set some values in an app with explanations under it.

You weren't able to tell one single argument and I have not enough knowledge to judge. You're a hero man! I'm out now.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] giarob78:
I've tried to say to you before, we are only spamming the thread, you are happy with KT? OK go with it, but stop to make s**t on different work from different dev. I say to you before but you don't understand, you, only you said that KT is more good than ALU kernel and this is not true for many users. This is the point, the kernels are both good and now we stop talk about this.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] rauschkugl:
Stop! I never said in any way that his work was bad or something like that! Don't put that into my mouth.

If it's not OK for somebody that kt works better for me, which was my personal opinion nothing more, than another kernel then he has to give me reasons with proper explanations why his is better, which he wasn't able to.

I'm not the only one if you take a look at the other thread.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505G mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] alucard_24:
1) Compile ML4 sourcecode kernel and test it on your phone and then tell me if it is stable. KT is a "PATCHED" ML4 kernel, not original. So I can say that ML4 source code is not stable.

2) We was discussing about phone speed, and you say something it is not true. I showed that you didn't know anything about origin of my kernel sources etc..

3) we are discussing about kernel knowledge and not other things!

4) I am a common man but before speaking and say something that it is no true I want to be sure that I analyzed all well!

Good evening
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Audiotrash:
Ok, something different now :) Here are my battery results of this rom. I love it so much; super smooth and fast. and the battery holds up pretty good to!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Jsilver73:
Does anyone have a mirror to download either the ROM or modem? Gdrive says too many downloads, and modem days took too long to download and gives another link which also does not work? :(
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] jamal2367:
People Plesse dont fight here ...!!!! [MENTION=4899086]alucard_24[/MENTION] your kernel is great not dev or some user can say its Bad .....THX 2 weeks using your kernel no RR all is good :) !!!!

People is the Aroma installer good programming ?? Bug Fixes needed for that ??:)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] atomfix:
Using the new ART from the developer screen, don't notice anything different
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Puky70:
I am on R5 with latest Alucard Kernel the Bootanimation

very laggy. Someone with the same issue?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] N!KE26:
Rom -> https://mega.co.nz/#!x98SmKTb!YJgzjC6gl7lMTYfm_f2M89ImWzDnHvuO-nnG-uS5ZKg
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] khan1989:
Yeah. Bug fix needed!

If you select alucard kernal from aroma installer, phone fails to boot.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] diegopt:
Worked fine here.

Tapatalk Pro • Gt-I9505 Google Edition 4.4.2 •
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] khan1989:
I am using philz recovery, old boot loader.

Yourself?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] diegopt:
Philz too.. New bootloader.

Never happened that issue.. Same in r5.

Always booting normal.

Tapatalk Pro • Gt-I9505 Google Edition 4.4.2 •
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] khan1989:
Strange, I had to select ktoonz, boot, then flash alucard separately.

I'm now on ktoonz anyway.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] diegopt:
Android secrets.

Tapatalk Pro • Gt-I9505 Google Edition 4.4.2 •
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] -sandro-:
www.livewinter.com/mirror it's in Europe if it matters to you