yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
Our kernel ALWAYS mounted ext4 partitions, from the start of the development. Simply can't mount as ext3 because /data partition isn't ext3. If you read log again, you will notice that there is [ 3.029235] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p25): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null). Maybe disabling ext2 & 3 in defconfig can help to have less errors in log, but the main problem is that kernel panic

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Unjustified Dev:
We should look at Ubuntu defconfig on igloo and see what they did I'm sure it's around the same thing needs enabling
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
I will get another janice in ~18 days or so. Then maybe I can lose some free time on Ubuntu Touch :silly:

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] haky 86:
Compilation done successfully

Sorry mates i know its not for s2 plus section because no one give me a good solution respecting all of course, but i build a rom successfully flash is ok but screen go to black and i hear the original animation of samsung and also the phone never got shutdown, so thats mean i port it??thanks in advance ;)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
OT

What kind of ROM you built? Stock based or AOSP/CM-based? Btw, I guess it's stock based since you heard samsung sound

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] #Henkate:
If we will get ubuntu touch working,nova fusion (i call them noobies fusion) will release Ubuntu Touch [FULLY WORKING] :laugh::laugh::laugh:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] haky 86:
Ok i try with AOSP phablet-4.4.2 with edited device tree to be compatible for aosp, compilation work fine but it stop on generating root ota zip i guess i got a 140mb of ota package before delete, but my s2 plus doesn't support fastboot for manual flashing.t

I try with old source such as phablet-10.1 like this guide some, should apply the patches that we can found in ubuntu/hybris/debian/patches, before apply it compilation work successfully, flash ok->boot ok-> but the screen got black and i hear the original samsung animation so i compile utouch or just cm10.1 :confused::confused: the flash is about 32mb, and also now i am trying with edited recovery.fstab by platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.1/ and see if work. :good:

p.s. : i guess should not use cm11 in any sources based on cm10.1 so i suggest to only device, kernel, vendor and common repos based on cm10.1 only i will do a test for i9500 too but i need a tester, pm me if anyone are interesting ;)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
[MENTION=4883214]haky 86[/MENTION]

You cannot use phablet-10.1, wasted time. I have an i9505 now and trying to get Ubuntu Touch working, libhybris it's updated (its only branch is 'master') and now compatible with 4.4 only. You need deploy zip to push Ubuntu Touch rootfs (in data partition), is available till 13.10, and no longer from 14.04 so this means that something changed and I don't know what. Correct OTA zip (contains android low-level things such as executables, libraries... no dalvik/art at all, no apks) should be between 30~45 max MB, not more. If you have cm10.1 or utouch you shouldn't hear any sound, and it's strange that you hear original samsung sound (maybe you have a flag into device tree that copy samsung sound in system/media?) Why omap fstab? You have a broadcom SoC

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] haky 86:
so that mean maybe working only on a qualcomm based phone right?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
I don't think, simply means that we have no method to use Ubuntu Touch at the moment, since is unknown where rootfs should be
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MikiGry:
[MENTION=5464206]AntaresOne[/MENTION]

I was brosing in XDA and (or it was a dream) i found ubuntu for I9000

Works :

Basic UI

Camera

WI-FI

Edit

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2162534

Wysłane z mojego nexusowego tablecika.....
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
I9000 is based on Exynos 3110 and not on damned NovaThor :silly:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MikiGry:
Sorry for that un-usefull than.

I thought as long as this device has close specs to our s advance (one rom was ported from i9000) this Ubuntu will be usefull.

Wysłane z mojego nexusowego tablecika.....
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
[MENTION=5468078]MikiGry[/MENTION]

Don't worry, you haven't killed me or someone else. Lol

SoC is totally different, except this Ubuntu Touch device specific zip cannot be ported from other devices, even if 99,9% close specs to the target one. Needs to be compiled from source, since low level things such as android-ramdisk (compiled to load UT) and libs (compiled for libhybris) are different for all the devices

Inviato dal mio GT-I9505
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DynamicTash:
Bump! Still working on this? Wants to hear (read) some updates! Will help you after a while!
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AntaresOne:
Not yet (or never)
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
MOD EDIT: These posts have been moved here from the 256 MB sd card thread to continue the RAID discussion

FNSM
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
Screw that. I have a hard drive dedicated for sd card backups. If one fails, I buy a new one and restore my lost data. After the first time of loosing 64 gigs of music, movies roms and patches you really value how much data even 64gb is. I couldn't imagine loosing 2tb, that would devastate me. Sorry but I would never consider anything more than 128gb. Maybe 512gb but that's the absolute max. Having that much data on a device that has a finite number of read and writes makes my skin crawl....
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
Don't be so myopic.

Multimedia files keep growing as processing and storage capacity increases.

Textual documents are tiny, thus easily synced via the cloud.

You think you'll lose much data on a 512GB card when ONE 4K 60FPS video takes 1/10th the space?

(Actually, today's Blu-Ray videos are ALREADY 1/10th the space at 40-50GB)

512GB will be a sneeze in a few years, just as 32GB is today.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
Nothing I said had anything to do with being myopic. I know our data needs are growing, I know laser based retnal projector displays and 128 bit processors are coming weather we like it or not. My problem is data loss not not being nearsighted. Now give me 4 micro sd card slots with a raid controller and these cards will be of some use to me. I can get all off subject and go this way and that, but here and now, the next two years I have this phone, my statement still stands. I don't buy things I won't use. If you buy a 2tb card, by the time you fill it up and actually start benefiting by the convenience of not having to change out your card, it'll probably be near the end of its life cycle, and I hope you would have made a backup.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
certainly, everything is backed up. Regardless of the sd capacity, all your data can be synced wirelessly.

Anything today is already redundantly backed up if you're using the cloud.

I question whether redundant storage technology has a place in mobile devices where size and power efficiency is priority.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
If it's possible here its possible inside a phone. Stagger stack 4 of them together and put the raid controller on the motherboard.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] @rbiter:
Bye bye battery life.

Sent from my SM-N9005
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
At first I thought your concern was data lost due to hardware lost from theft or misplacement. But now, it's clear you are actually concerned about data integrety.

Why are you so concerned? Most phones don't encounter heavy write operations, especially ones heavy enough to necessitate RAID level protection, especially on SD Cards.

Data Error rates are extremely low even in hard disks. Something like 1 bit per 2TB of data operation. Hence the necessity in heavy IO applications.

But for write once a week photos, documents, videos? ABSURD.

Are you running SQL, banking transaction, or email servers on your phone?
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
BTW, RAID is not the same as backup.

Google this quote if you need reason why.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
If everything else is getting higher capacity it's only right batteries should follow along. They are actually making huge strides in battery tech with 3d printing.

---------- Post added at 11:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 PM ----------

True enough, it's not. But the reason I said 4 slots is for a raid 0+1 configuration. It would be possible to double the read and write speeds of the same cards while still avoiding data "loss". 4 drives is the minimum for this configurstion and would effictivly give you 4 tb of stable safe data while vastly improving the read and write speeds. Data integrity is the opposite of data corruption, which is a form of data loss. If data integrity was my concern it would still be able to be salvaged. I'm completely capable of data restoration, repairing indexes and have special boot disks for several methods of corrupt data recovery and repair. Even with hard drives the data is recoverable but not so with flash without alot (and i mean ALOT)more effort, because nothings impossible. Now back to raid 0+1. Striped and mirrored. One drive goes out, the system let's you know of a fault, the drive is replaced and your back on your feet. No data corruption, double protection and double the speed. True it's not the same as a backup. It's way better.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] @rbiter:
Long ways off still. Battery tech.

Sent from my SM-N9005
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
About my concern of data "loss" read above. Again data integrity is the opposite of data corruption, which is a form of data loss. You should google your terms and understand what your saying before correcting and telling someone else to google something. It doesn't matter what I run weather it be torrent, music, video or whatever. I keep everything i download. I probably write to my card multiple times an hour not a week. I have had a couple cards crap out on me and lost all the data on them. It's happened to me and plenty of other people and as soon as it happens to you a couple of times and you loose years of collected data you'll understand too (if you don't keep a backup)

---------- Post added at 11:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:27 PM ----------

No. Not really. The 2tb sd card is theroitical I doubt there is one in existence. There is already a 3d printed battery. It's closer than you might think.

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2013/06/3d-printed-microbattery-grain-sand
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
Of course data corruption is opposite of Data integrity. There is nothing in my post that was intended to state otherwise, Must be some misunderstanding there.....

The reason why I suggested that you look up the terms backup vs raid was because it seemed to me like you were using those term interchangeably.

They serve different purposes, with not one better than the one.

Conventional wisdom states, RAID is mainly designed to sustain up-time, while backups are to prevent data lost.

To confuse their usage, is to do so at your own peril, (or you data's peril). A cursory reading on the topic will illuminate a myriad of sound reasons why.

Regardless of what you choose to keep and for how long, on your SD Card, The fact that you were able to lose all your critical data merely by ONE card corruption says you are simply not employing the right data backup techniques.

And no, RAID is not the answer to this.

That you think halving capacity and quadrupling power consumption of write operations by employing RAID on a space / power limited mobile platform to combat data lost when you're only writing files "a couple times an hour" is absurd.

It's like attempting to drive a nail thru some boards by ramming a car into it. Even though it's a costly implementation, It doesn't work well, cause it's the wrong tool.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
May have been. I felt as though you implied I still had my data it was just no longer the same as it once was. An excerpt from wikipedia:

OK. I understand both methods. I don't get what you mean by conventional wisdom. Please expand on what you mean here because I feel we may have the same understanding but we voice what we mean differently. Raid is an array of drives set up in different configurations to do different jobs. I'm not gonna look it up, I've set up several in the past and understand the pros and cons for each of the levels. Raid 1 may not be a backup per say, but it's not that different. It's basically hardware that mirrors a drive. The benefit here is it gives you the ability to read and write two places at the same time. Now add striping on top of that and you can roughly increase your read and write speeds 4x depending on hardware. A raid array on a phone may use more battery but you accused me of being myopic unjustly earlier but now I can correctly say your being myopic.

Backup is having a separate copy of information you have to preform either manually or automatically, either way it takes some type of effort from the user to set up or preform. Them to remember to maintain in my case.

I get this analogy but it not a way I would have put it. Yes there was a time where I wouldn't have expected my card to fail and didn't keep a backup and then a second time. But honestly do you keep your card backed up? If you connect your card to a computer that often surely you don't need this absurd 1tb of space. How is raid 1+0 not the answer to this? Not being myopic and understanding by the time this, 2tb cards and much higher density batteries will be redially avaliable is not the answer? Halving capacity? It's the only way to be certain. At least if one card failed you could simply just replace it and not worry about loosing anything. You may be quadrupling power but one card only requires 200 uA at maximum performance. Surely there are other ways to cut down on power consumption than worrying about this little piece of the pie. The trade off would be 4x read and write speeds. Faster access is worth the miniscule trade off.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
Clearly, the differentiating use cases between RAID (including RAID 1) and Backup is not yet grasped by you. It's a common misconception for most beginners. But until you understand the difference, you will continually be susceptible to data loss.

Compared to Backup, RAID can not protect you from the following scenarios while backups can:

1.) Unintended deletion or modification by user / application

2.) Virus attack of data

3.) hardware controller failure destroying the entire RAID array

4.) Theft / Misplacement

Backup is resistant to data loss in such scenarios.

You can easily Folder Sync your critical files to the cloud with GBs to spare. If setup properly, this all happens automatically without your intervention. And in many cases, such services are offered for free. You are also free to encrypt your files if top privacy security is of concern.

Large videos should be kept on a file or cloud server anyways and can be backed up offline if data-plan is a limiting factor. This is of minimal inconvenience since large video files are rarely created and even more rarely modified.

Wise data storage plans implement both RAID and backup solutions to combat all scenarios of data loss.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
Insinuating I'm a beginner is offensive. 2 years of computer networking and having a ccna certification should tell you everything you need to know about what I know and dont. Apparently you would like to argue more than look at valid points. If you think backup drives aren't prone to failures as well maybe you are the begginer.

Two of your reasons for backup over raid are user error and can apply to a backup as well. I would never unintentionally delete a file and even if I did there is recovery software that can retrieve it. A beginner could accidentally format their backup drive thinking it was another. User error. Virus attacks are user error as well. You should have proper protection, not download shady files and have a proper firewall. Viri affect backup drives as well. If it infects your system and lays dormant it could easily be made to corrupt your entire system after it senses a backup destroying both. Backup drives have controllers as well. Just last week I had to replace a usb external controller (upgraded it to firewire while I was at it) because the computer would no longer recognize the drive. The data was still intact as would be the data on the cards. I would never ever use the cloud (remotely, a wifi drive would be completely different) due to bottlenecks. I hate having to wait to download it in the first place why would I compound that. The reason for multiple sd cards is my way of avoiding the cloud. I am so against not physically having control of my data it's not funny. Kudos on your last suggestion though, that's what I would do anyways.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] @rbiter:
I never mentioned using the cloud for backup. I dont have anything worth losing there. Raid on a phone is just so I have 2 years experience as ccna tech and I gotta come to xda and tell everybody they're doing it wrong kind of wrong.

sent from my sm-9005.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
Wasn't talking to you.... read who I was replying to.... I never said anyone was doing anything wrong. I merely suggested a way to use high capacity sd cards in a way that would be safe and reduce the frequency of backups (if you even felt the need for that additional security) I was criticized for the system I use as far as multiple smaller sd cards to reduce failures (called myopic even) so I was suggesting a better way that was the opposite of myopic. What what's with your post? Are you drunk? It's kinda jumbled together and rambling.
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] klau1:
It's ok to be a beginner. Everyone can learn. I'm not sure what CCNA has to do with data storage practices. But touting out credentials is a sure sign of someone frustrated from be fresh out of counter arguments.

Confusing RAID and Backup purposes is one of the most common misconceptions regarding data integrity. The numerous Q/As on forums regarding this issue is proof of this.

Your responses were read carefully, and none contained points that can counter my arguments.

Until you do.

These very statements above, down-playing the most common error, user error, reek of beginner attitude. Actually, your naivety has provided quite a laugh!!

And no recovery software can't always retrieve it, especially when the free space has been overwritten before you notice. Nor are Virus attacks always usr error.

Explain how an Android virus on your smart phone can infect your backup on your PC or Google's Server?

Yes, so explain how a controller failure on a PC or cloud server used for backup can simultaneously destroy the data on your phone?

That's your choice, you can alternatively backup to your own personal cloud. But how you feel about cloud backups, or download speeds, doesn't change the reality that RAID is NOT A BACKUP solution.

After reading all of this, it's obvious you misinterpreted, thinking that by "backup" I meant, backup ON-DEVICE, stored locally.

The fact that you can even conceive of doing something SOOOO stupid is clear indication of beginner mentality.

A useful backup is OFF-DEVICE, and preferably OFF-SITE. Any competent data admin would know this. Hell, even a couple of University Computer 101 courses state this.

No wonder you fail to see the point of backups over RAID, you don't even know what it is!!! :laugh:
[Galaxy Note 3 Accessories] DustinKimble:
I explicitly said an external drive a couple of times. The only backup on device would be a nandroid. There are so many ways you took what I said wrong. I have better things to do than this, I doubt you do.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dimitrisd:
Hi,i am new in samsung and android.i have the GT-I9192 s4 mini duos and when i am in some applications like google search bar and i press the home button to return to the homescreen always i take this message in the attached photo,i choose the option always but again i have the same...
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stepan12:
OMG same here i own a i9195!

this issue is such annoying, hard reset didnt solve it though
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dimitrisd:
yes its very annoying but what can we do and solve the problem?all the s4 mini have the same issue?
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stepan12:
My mom has the same phone as mine (she bought it 1 week earlier than me) but she has no issue with touchwiz

It's kind of strange

I guess the only option is waiting patiently for 4.3
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dimitrisd:
I live in Greece and my phone is american so I haven't warranty,I bought it because I wanted a good dual sim phone...so I can't call samsung greece to find a solution..I suppose you have warranty did you call samsung and explain the problem?
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stepan12:
I have warranty but i bought my phone from a different phone store, but im waiting for 4.3 thats the only solution .
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dimitrisd:
are you sure this update 4.3

solve the problem?i hope so
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] shaaaaa:
atm my caller id is only working with number/names in the SIM memory..

is there anyway that i can have the contact that stored on the phone (sync outlook) to come up for caller id?

is there a software to patch this prob? o is there i setting i m missing to activate this?

My ROM is the newly updated one in end NOV (with blackberry function).

Using O2mini...
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] shaaaaa:
can anyone help me...? ><~~
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] thangbom:
Sorry, I have no clue on this issue, but I experienced a the similar problem, as my contacts (phone book) grows over time. As it grows, the phone took longer time to search through the phone book before could really display the caller's name. Instead only the number was displayed. Can anybody tweak around with this problem?
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] kanryu:
Re: CALLER ID not show for numbers/name stored in phone memo

here how u goes

Start > Programs > Sim Manager

Wait for the Sim Manager to load all your contacts from Sim. Once done, highlight all the contacts, tap tools menu & select Save to Contacts. It should copy all the selected contact to your phone memory by now.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] shaaaaa:
er.. dont think that was my question/answer..

but thanks for trying to help anyway ^^

I HAVE RESOLVED this problem now:

I think because there was no contact (ZERO) on my sim card memory, for some reason it didnt trigger this funtion.

So what i did to make it work was to make a new contact on the sim card with the number/contact that was also stored in my phone memory, and try call it, i realised it was showing the contact name that i had on the phone memory not the sim (as the number is the same but to distingush i make up differ name). Then i deleted the contact on my sim (back to ZERO) and try call again. NOW the caller ID shows up.

GG
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] kettir:
I was thinking this morning about ripping a CD I have and then wondered, "If I can't use the Win7 PC, has anyone made it possible to connect my i747 directly and rip a CD that way?" I also have a Toshiba Thrive if I have to use that instead.