yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
While it maybe better it still needs to follow our rules. And that means any kernel posted has to have complete and up to date source code.

It looks like people dont understand what happens when someone breaks the gpl. So I will explain the biggest problem. If a dev breaks the GPL they lose all rights to distribute anything and everything licensed under the GPL until the their rights are restored, which never happens.

We even publicly called Micromax out on it here http://www.xda-developers.com/android/oems-and-gpl-compliance/
[Micromax A110] jaunty:
You already know that we don't have proper sources, But still our ROM are allowed.

So whats the problem with a kernel, its nothing.. Just gives pain to us.

Do it in this way, wither Bann everything including ROM and devices of this OEM, Or let these threads run in a good condition.

If you can allow a ROM you can also allow a KERNEL.

Be fair on both parts, dont discourage a developer.. Either BE on whatever you said, or stop this DRAMA of SO called GPL
[Micromax A110] Sk.D:
Wow the main guy who started this **** must be enjoying it and the people suffered are we.
[Micromax A110] jatin@1:
Calling Micromax publicly is a really appreciable thing sir.

I now just await for two things

THAT IS M WAITING WHEN THE BAN WILL END UP AND WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCE OF THAT PUBLIC CALL.

Though I fear that micromax will be ignorant as earlier.

And regarding buying MICROMAX...actually we buy it because of its awesome hardware quality at reasonable price. And for software we simply come here--->XDA.:)
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
Look I am done trying to help you understand. If you force our hand we will remove all of the device forums, We dont want to but if push comes to shove then we will. We are willing to over look stock kernel source missing as that is not really ya'lls fault, but a dev not updating his sources for a custom kernel IS his fault and he will be held accountable.
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
Because the public call doesnt really effect that part of the world I dont see it doing much. If I were you guys I would look into your local laws about it. And then raise an uproar if the laws are the same about the GPL as they are in most places. I know alot of laws are different in India so I can not say for sure what the companies are held to there.

I understand why you guys buy them. But as long as you do. They have no reason to change and unless they do the devices will never get any software support that is worth anything. A few custom roms here and there and maybe a custom kernel (if the dev keeps his sources up to date) but other then that there is not much that can be done by the big teams like AOKP, CM, PA and such.
[Micromax A110] jaunty:
No No, As you said its non of anyones business if XDA banns someone, I stop that thr.

But the point is you are changing your words every second.

When you say these ROMs are not allowed, but ROM are still there, even you know none MTK have proper sources, still you make new threads for them.

And for single person your rule comes and you stick to your rule, and bann him..

What's this? In every state you are unfair.

Its nothing but dictatorship... I make rule, oops i change rule.. ohh.. let me modify rule..

Ahh i forgot rule, now i remember the rule so you are banned for 100 years.. awesome..

Someone clap for XDA please...
[Micromax A110] deeplyyoung:
+1 agreed wid u
[Micromax A110] khan_frd2002:
Yeh...He Is Right Stick To Rule Or Make This Kernel In
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
Who said life was fair.

First off we dont make threads. Users do. We allow them to be nice. You have no idea what your talking about. Some rules are being over looked to allow you to have custom roms. We dont feel we should hold you guys accountable for an OEM that is a joke. What the Dev did has nothing to do with the OEM. We can hold the OEM accountable for the stock kernel. A custom built kernel is the responsiblity of the "Dev" That posts it. What about that dont your understand.

Now if you really want me to I can go and make every single Micromax thread/forum vanish. Not something I want to do. But your sheer lack of comprehension is really pushing it. The only reason they got forums to begin with was because we were unaware that they broke GPL laws. Had we known then there is no way they would have gotten any forums. Just look at the forums or threads for other devices from china. Oh yeah wait there arent any.

Now you have to remember we are a developers site. Made for and by developers. And companies like Micromax are a bane to real developers.
[Micromax A110] ibshar:
I don't think you should say that there is very little development in this section!

Even without the OEM support we were able to get Android 4.2 possible on our phones. Our Android Dev section is full of custom ROMs of every flavour possible! Finally we also got KERNEL development started... And now this is how you are treating the GUY who is undoubtedly the TOP developer in this section.

Ofcourse if this is how you treat developers in this Forum then YOU are making sure that we will never get the big teams like CM, PA etc..!
[Micromax A110] jatin@1:
[MENTION=5284995]jaunty[/MENTION]...pls check your pm bro.

Actually sir, I got exactly what you want to say and tell us.

But unfortunately this is INDIA.

If I were a lawyer, than also I would have to struggle soo hard in order to push this comparitively less important issue(In front of others) to some decision (that also I would get after some 10-15 yrs).AND I AM JUST A STUDENT WHO SIMPLY SPENDS HIS DAY ON TUITION CLASSES AND THE REST ON XDA.:(

And hoping these steps from any other source.....we would have to live till eternity for this :screwy:
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
No the big teams dont touch any device that doesnt have proper kernel source from the OEM. Micromax is making sure it never happens.

As for comment about little development. You do see that you are in the legacy & low activity forums right? But that is not the point.

This all started because some Dev was banned. Well his ban was deserved and approved. When/If he comes back then he will know what to do, not to be banned again. If he does the same thing again then he will be banned for good.
[Micromax A110] jatin@1:
B/w can a get a hint about when the ban will expire?
[Micromax A110] ibshar:
I appreciate your patience in replying to everyone here and thank you for that.
[Micromax A110] jaunty:
no one from XDA supported us in development ever, just posted thet you cant include boot.img

How a device will start without boot.img and without that kernel whats the actual purpose if a custom ROM.

Actually what the hell is this dude?

We have a custom ROM but cant have a kernel to boot it.. Bull ****.

Be fair to your rules, go ahead and kill this pain, remove this OEM.. go ahead..

Stop earning by advertising on these threads, stick to rules and show that its site for developers...
[Micromax A110] jatin@1:
+1..

I ALSO SAW THE POLITENESS AND PATIENCE IN YOUR LANGUAGE MODS.:thumbup:
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
I cant get into that.

I dont mind really. I have been fighting this OEM for a very long time on this matter and I dont even have access to these devices, but I dont want people to be limited on what they can do to their devices due to OEM not following the law.
[Micromax A110] jatin@1:
Thanks...this will be quite good for all the somewhat "bad feeling people" and for me too as I am really curious about This.

And thanks for quick and kind replies.:)
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
Ok I am gonna be as nice as I can about this as I can.

A. Xda doesnt help with development. It is up to the users to dig in and make development happen.

B. Custom roms including the stock kernel are over looked to give you guys custom roms.

C. You are really pushing it. I am a nice guy most of the time but your sheer lack of trying to accept any point other then your own is getting old.

I will leave you with this. a link to a post I made a long time ago but is still valid.

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=16682226&postcount=2441

I am not gonna remove all the threads here just because you dont understand what is going on. There are more people here then just the people upset about this.

Now if you really want to make changes then dig in and learn. And then post a GPL compliant kernel. Become part of the solution and not part of the problem.
[Micromax A110] jaunty:
again, a dead end..

I am not upset for his bad, i have a good kernel and a good ROM.

My point is, since m on XDA the pain of sharing boot.img through PM is given to MY community.

I need a final solution to this, As you are allowing ROM i need you to allow kernels also, otherwise both are Warez , your XYZ rule #6.

i know you have a big team, and all members are senior than me, but end up this thing. Either allow everything or allow nothing.

Be genuine, or dont pretend to be genuine..
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
I already stated a rom with stock kernel is ok. If you use a custom built kernel then the source code HAS to be made available. If it comes to light you are using the pm system to pass around a kernel that breaks the rules that is an instant and permanent ban.

Wayne Tech Nexus
[Micromax A110] jaunty:
i guess you have permissions to look into the PM of everybody??

Go and check it, if this is true than everyone in A110 community will be banned, Dont believe me, :confused:

Go ahead, check and do let me know if you found a single person who is not having a NON GPL kernel link..

i will be waiting to see everyone banned, and will eager to see that person who dont have any boot.img link in his PM inbox or sentbox..
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
You know what I am just about done with your attitude issues. Can we see all Pms? We own the site what do you think. We dont look at Pms as they are personal but as you just stated that you have been doing this it is an admission of guilt and by all rights I should ban you here and now but will give you some time to go and rethink about how you address people that provide you a forum for free to use.
[Micromax A110] jaunty:
Thank you soo much for giving me time, I have only XDA to think ABOUT?

And you have been very kind, but m fed up of this kernel issue.

I accept I shared boot.img and ready for permanent ban.

If not bann, will again share boot.img, so better you ban me..

Good bye.. :)
[Micromax A110] ekhasti:
I want to know why ban Andiroxu..

just for knowledge...

because of his sources are not updated or the issue with varun's kernel??

sorry if silly.. :eek:
[Micromax A110] zelendel:
All I will say is that he was told to keep his sources updated a few times and they were not. I will not go into details.
[Micromax A110] ekhasti:
No sir .. I don't want detail.. just want to know the reason of bann..

means if he update his sources than he come back.. am I right??

I want to know .. because really he is best developer in our community..

and a nice person.. ever ready to help us when feel some difficulties in development

that's it.. nothing else..
[Micromax A110] egzthunder1:
It isn't rocket science.... sources MUST BE UP TO DATE AS PER GPL GUIDELINES. Plain and simple. You don't comply, we give you some time to do so. If sources are not updated and put up to GPL requirements, the work gets taken down until sources are proper. If the behavior continues in spite of the warnings, you get banned. The offending dev will return once the ban period expires.

The reason for the ban was exactly what you quoted from zelendel's post.... Sources not updated after multiple requests... I don't care if he rescued a puppy from a collapsing building. Rules are rules and they must be followed....

Please put this matter to rest already. Once the investigation is over, it will be over. Until then, it is still going.

Thread closed.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] viniciusrsouza:
Guys, have any of you ever seen this???

My device is ALWAYS searching for GPS. Google Services is draining my battery and consuming GPS for more than EIGHT HOURS.

I know you may tell me to disable GPS, or disable location settings, and etc. But I need to keep all these things enabled because they are pretty useful on Foursquare, Maps, finding a taxi, and, mainly, for finding my device if something bad happens!

This never happened to me on Galaxy Note II or any other device. Has anyone ever faced this?!
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jaythenut:
You could try and clear data and cAshe
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Killberty:
Disable google location in the google settings app

Google settings app -> location -> disable

leave a 'thanks' if i helped

SM-N9005 URDLV 0x0

XDA Developers 4 premium app
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] henklbr:
What "app" are you using for monitoring your battery?
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] viniciusrsouza:
Already did this inside Google Play Services.

Yeah, that's a workaround, but Google Now stops working if I disable this. I'm trying to understand what's happening, since this is not normal and everybody needs the location settings enabled to get all features of a lot of apps.

For example, this never happened to me or other devices. Seems like an Android 4.3 and Google Services issue.

GSam Battery Monitor

Here you go: https://play.google.com/store/apps/..._medium=organic&utm_term=gsam+battery+monitor
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] henklbr:
Thanks; far more info than "Battery Stats"...

Thanks-button hit!
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] henklbr:
Yesterday, I got an update from Google Play Services (dated 22 nov 13)...

You can also install it via the web:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.gms
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] viniciusrsouza:
Didn't noticed this update, but I also got here, just checked now.

How did you noticed that? Is there any notification for you?
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] henklbr:
Pure luck: I went to the Play Store online and saw there was an update. On my S4 it was updated automatically...
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] progwork1:
Was it solved?

Seems the problem came back. Did you solved this by the time it was posted here?

Thanks
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CoNviCTZz:
I cracked my screen and want to copy things to my computer but I cant get past the lock screen. How do I bypass it? btw I cant used adb because usb debugging isn't turned on and the phone isn't rooted.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RealSlimShadyMC:
Sorry man, you're screwed. There is no way to bypass lockscreen.apk and go to launcher.apk without actually unlocking (AFAIK, don't quote me on it). Most stuff gets backed up by the google servers by default.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eksasol:
There is a method to do it with ADB, but not without: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1800799

If your bootloader is unlocked then you can install custom recovery and use command lines to back it up. But if its not, if you try to unlock it will wipe your entire device in the process.

If the data is valuable enough, ie naked pics, you could buy a new screen replacement.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KarimSalloum:
I've been on 320 dpi for a while now. on 5.7" its great and I'd like to keep it this way. however since I got my S view cover, it only works on 480 dpi, my question is, what do I need to change in Appsettings for the S view cover to stay on 480? I cannot find the proper app
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] njfoses:
Don't think anybody has figured this out yet.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] anoup:
Install nova launcher and chanmge nova launcher dpi to 320 in appmamager
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fadhil3536:
he said S-view interface. not launcher
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] anoup:
I think KarimSalloum needs a normal s view screen and 320DPI main screen.

The s view DPI cant be changed , but nova launcher can , You can change the nova launcher to 320 DPI and other apps ,
[Micromax A116] dreamyworld:
Hi Guys,

Just ported a ROM from N828

1) near AOSP

2) Pre-Rooted

3) De-odexed

4) Lighter ROM, after Gapss and 10 more apps Installed, I got 630MB space left on internal storage.

5) Updated google search with Google Experience Launcher(KitKat) (No More FC's)

6) Zipaligned.

7) Even after installing Gapps and Above 500MB Free Ram.

8) Super Fast, 13748 Score on AnTuTu Benchmark.

9) Adding more features to It

I will attache screenshots soon.

I am doing thorough testing of my ROM.

More Testing

1) GPS - Working first lock with in 17sec

2) Camera - All options work - Panaroma, Multi Angle

2) FM Radio - Testing

3) Etc...

If everything goes good. I will release the Rom SOON :)

Note: This thread is just to give info.... If I am unable to make the ROM perfect, I may not release the rom. So don't push me to do so.
[Micromax A116] Sk.D:
Lol everyones doing my job . Good work. Make it bugless:):):):):)
[Micromax A116] djkrish5610:
Please Bring NEW UI like Chameleon OS look or sumthing else....All AOSP roms look like same Stock rom
[Micromax A116] dreamyworld:
Ya.. Working to make it perfect.. Dat is the reason i did not post it in development section..

This rom has kind of samsung look.. But atleast im liking it...
[Micromax A116] eagledipesh:
Well you can release testing version, we can do the testing for you :)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] dafish:
I have somehow lost my task manager, do you know how I can get it back without doing a hard reset?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] armin:
Let me guess, you switched to the corporate install? Because that seems to do that particular trick of losing the task manager. I've had that happen before and I had to do a hard reset.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] astage:
On the o2 Exec, isn't the Task Manager an o2 addition that is not installed in Corporate mode?

When installed, the program is found under:

\Windows\Mobile solutions\o2ActiveUI\Modules\Task Manager\

along with the rest of the o2-specific crud!
[Sony Xperia M] rmgaikwad:
my phone is c2004, i have rooted my phone using this guide :

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=47513486#post47513486

after that installed link2sd and reboot my phone, but the is in bootloop at sony logo

how to get rid of this issue??:cyclops:
[Sony Xperia M] ansebovi:
download a .ftf of ur latest firmware of ur device[c1904/c1905/c2004/c2005 i think u know urs..] and flashtool...

use flashtool and flash the ftf...

u can see the firmware in xperia m android development...

for flashtool https://unrestrict.li/flashtool

guide here...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2054486
[Sony Xperia M] rmgaikwad:
Thanks for reply.... but when i remove sd card from my phone and on the phone, it becomes ok....:laugh: :laugh:
[Sony Xperia M] ansebovi:
Try uninstall link2sd and try...

Link2sd will work only after u format the 2nd partition of sdcard to fat32
[Sony Xperia M] rmgaikwad:
Thanks
[Sony Xperia M] ansebovi:
if u want guide

http://www.xperiablog.net/2011/12/12/link2sd-guide-never-worry-about-internal-memory-limits-again/

see here after 3rd step in that site for partition creation
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ibadimran:
My nexus s battery life sucks. when the screen is on, it decreases at a rate of 1% per minute. I've installed ds battery saver which helps a bit when the screen is off but playing games, browsing the web is out of the question for me. i play 1 match in fifa 14(6 mins) and the battery decreases by 10%. I think its the vampire drain issue but is there any solution for it?

P.S. I've attached the battery graph screen shots.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Setting.Out:
Try another ROM or kernel..
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] razzor1984:
TWO options as Setting.Out said new rom, maybe change the kenrel (marmit 9.1 for 4.3.x) or buy a new battery.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mejobloggs:
I get the same thing on my Nexus S. Been through different roms, batteries, everything. No luck. I'm wondering if some Nexus S just have some weird hardware fault

Actually... after re-reading your post I see you mention the problem only happens with the screen on. Mine actually decharged just as fast with screen off. Like it never idled or something.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] filipeglfw:
A year after I bought my NS battery life was really poor. I sent it to Samsung Tech Support and they changed a few hardware pieces, making battery life improve a little. However if this was a hardware issue I think you would have noticed something before (you probably have this phone for long enough)

Cheers
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mejobloggs:
Yeah it's been like this ever since I bought it 2 years ago. Every time I send it back they just replace the battery even though I've explained it's not the battery. But anyway, I'll stop interrupting the OP's thread :p
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] michalurban:
Battery drain

Hi,

I just bought a new battery for my i9023, because the old (original) ona was about two years old and lasted only few hours. Now I know the new battery will take some time before getting to its maximum capacity.

What Im curious about is what a "normal" battery consumption when on standby and conntected to wifi - because I dont remember anymore.what it used to be with my phone about say a year ago. In the evening, I charged the phone to 100%, rebooted, wait until it said "charged" again and the I disconnected the charger, turned the screen off and went to sleep. After 10 hours of sleep (lol) it showed up that it took 23% of the battery, wifi (22%) beaing the main culprit. It means 2,3% of battery life every hour on standby.

Is it ok or should I keep looking?

Im using stock 4.1.2 with Marmite 8.7 kernel (9.1 doesnt work with BLN with my phone) - smartassV2 governor set like this (but using NStools):

echo "500000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/awake_ideal_freq;
echo "200000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/sleep_ideal_freq;
echo "500000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/sleep_wakeup_freq
echo "85" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/max_cpu_load;
echo "70" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/min_cpu_load;
echo "200000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/ramp_up_step;
echo "200000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/ramp_down_step;
echo "48000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/up_rate_us
echo "49000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/smartass/down_rate_us
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mirkozg15:
maybe its your battery...open the cover an look for a hump,if there is one...recycle it and get yourself a new one...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Progressive82:
Hi guys,

1. it's a bit of time, since it came out the Nexus 5 exactly, that my Galaxy Nexus puts a lot of time to place the icons on the display, and consequently to load home screen and all apps. I observed that the system apps do not have the dex files, so I think that the reason is due to this. Now I ask you, how can I create dex file for each system app and place it in the folder in order to speed start-up?

2. From the same period it lags for a few minutes when I turn on wifi or mobile data, I have resolved it using greenify to google play services.

I have Android 4.3 with stock rom and TWRP recovery.

Thanks to those I will respond.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wildpig1234:
WTF? I am getting this "music playback error couldn't play the track you request" by google music play!!!! These mp3 play fine with poweramp and n7player.... wtf? I cleared all data and update google musc play and start and still doesn't work.

F**k google. I can tell everyone for one thing. Yes, samsung s4 may have more apps installed but at least a lot of them work right out of the box. The default music player app on s4 actually has folder browsing and screenlock. May not be as fancy as poweramp but everything just works.... I got the n5 for my sister. I hate to give her a defective product and i hope i can get all the softwares work for her by xmas, but i am so glad I am keeping the s4.

Help!!!!