yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] blackbunny96:
Hy guys, I'm proud to launch a new ROM from BunnyTEAM Developers.

We had a difficult period and that's why we didn't launch or update our existing ROMs.

Since there is no android 4.4 for our device, i decided to port and to make a 4.3.1 android rom with android 4.4 apps and add-ons.

This is the first version so it is not bug free. Every bug you find please tell me

NEW Don't use this rom as a daily rom. We have found some bugs and we will correct them shortly so don't try this unless you are a tester/advanced person who want to help us discover more bugs

Known bugs:

- google keyboard force close

- google search not working = not working android 4.4 launcher

- hangouts give force close

Changelog v1.0.0:

added Hangouts

added nexus 5 launcher

added quickoffice

added android 4.4 camera and gallery

added android 4.4 e-mail app

added nexus bootanimation

edited build.prop to show android version 4.4

other android 4.4 stuff which i forgot

Screenshots will be added shortly

Download link:link

Gapps: same android 4.4 gapps from cm10.2

Android 4.4 Wallpapers : link

Our official webpage: Link

Our official facebook page : link
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] blackbunny96:
Reserved :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] blackbunny96:
Reserved again :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza7991:
Good job ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sgspluss:
Well yeah you are right atm there no kitkat for our device but as you know kitkat is new and over 80% dont have it as officially or custom rom, so be a bit patient i am sure the ADC-Team will work on it if they have time... ;)

But apart from this, its nice to see a new rom for our device... good job :highfive:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Calin:
You should also include the credits, because i don't think you ported android 4.3.1
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rickvrolings:
Welcome back! Happy to see a new rom from you. I will test it later tonight. Thanks :thumbup:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] aXiDroid:
After applying the package system boots much longer, when it's finally on, when it is needed to enter the PIN code, wifi turns on (it was off before flashing) and the phone resets itself.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] blackbunny96:
thx for telling me this. I will thry to solve this problem quick
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] 0l1v3r:
Very nice
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] AlessandroXCV:
Emh... An answer by our staff and also several users:

There is enough to copy the WinROM almost internally by the VeyRemiX ROM, that now copy your web page almost entirely by the NitroX-developers Official Page? :laugh:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Calin:
Hmm, yeah they only need to copy the chat box now :D

Sent from my GT-I9001
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sgspluss:
Hmh dont know what i can say about that...

Copy other work and copy other websites?

Well thats not work thats crap (sorry but isnt it?)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Calin:
Yes, it is, and besides to create a site of a dedicated rom first you need to develop a real rom not to put only stuff in the rom. Don't to be rude but only because the android 4.4 stuff like camera and other stuff are ported must to be included in a rom. You need to have a plan and to include something new developed from You or from the team
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] blackbunny96:
k , first of all i am not responsable for the website. In the logo section on the website it says by olix. Sorry for that, i will tell him to change the website. Second why you judge me for WinROM. I don't want to be rude but...... You rom is based on android 4.1.2 , mine on android 4.0. In your rom you added launcher8 and that's all(no ofence). I will make a list of what i added in my rom: windows bootanimation, wp7 contacts,dialer, messaging, launcher7 and launcher 8 and windows phone MULTITASKING. And I even didn't use you launcher , i use the launcher8 made by Timo Kujala. If you make a rom, why you don't let someone else to improve it?

I say sorry again for the website but you are not allowed to jugde someone else's work unless you have something better. And i didn't copy you base rom even, i use stock cm9.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] blackbunny96:
yes and i forgot to say something ..... YOUR WEBSITE IS BASED ON A FREE THEME ON THE WEB so you don't have any rights for you website look.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Calin:
Hey, Look my signature and then post again... I didn't develop any rom based on Android 4.1.2 -.- or with a Windows 8 style.....

Sent from my GT-I9001
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] blackbunny96:
sorry for that i thought that you are a member from nitrox developers
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wwhiterabbitt:
Anyone help me with this please? I did look through some of the other posts when I googled this but all I was seeing was non responsivennes later fixed ina different version of CWM.

I have an AT&T HTC ONE and I have no touch responsiveness in CWM Recovery (Touch Version) And no responsivness when trying to install Roms that use Aroma... Any Fix for this?? Im really at a loss.... :((
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nkk71:
Which version number are you using? This one: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2173863 should work just fine.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wwhiterabbitt:
Im currently running CWM 6.0.3.1 But how can I flash the one your suggesting above me? I can not get my phone to go into Fastboot or Bootloader. When I hold Volume Down or Up and power when restarting it does nothing and simply boots to regular phone. The only way Im able to get into recovery mode is selecting it from restart option in ROM.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nkk71:
"CWM 6.0.3.1" that's the problem, touchscreen was updated in 6.0.3.2 and above I believe.

Well the volume down should work, so first check the following:

1- Settings -> Power -> Fast boot is disabled

2- Settings -> developer options -> USB debugging is enabled

then while in the ROM, connect to PC and type:

adb reboot bootloader <- this will get you to FASTBOOT USB

then:

fastboot erase cache

fastboot flash recovery <name of recovery>.img

fastboot erase cache

fastboot reboot-bootloader

enter RECOVERY, and touchscreen should be working again

Hit the thanks button if I've helped ;) and let me know if you need more info
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wwhiterabbitt:
Well first off thanks alot for your time in responding!!

Well when I first rooted the phone last night I had gone into CWM and I wiped cahe delvik cache and factory reset , wiped storage and then like an idiot I realized oooooo I have no usb storage to load the Rom onto. So I tried to sideload the rom from the sideload option in CWM. THe Rom install started but because I had no touch screen use (and the Rom was using that easy installer pack so many Sense roms have, that allow you to pick on screen option before the Rom actually installs) I couldnt get the sense Rom I wanted to install.

So then .... I was stuck in Sideload Mode in CWM... so I quickly downloaded a non sense Rom.. one I was hoping would just sideload and not ask questions. Which It did! So now Im running SinLEssRom But When I go into rom settings and search for Fastboot Disable, or USB debugging option I dont see them....

Do I need to load a Sense rom for me to turn these settings off? Does any Sense rom install without using (I think its called Aroma installer)?

Can I go into CWM recovery, select sideload, and sideload the Recovery you suggested? Im afraid since im IN the recovery It would brick the phone...

Thansk for your time in reading all this...
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nkk71:
That's why hitting the thanks button is a nice.

For future reference: You could have still used the Volume UP and DOWN, and POWER buttons to do this without touchscreen.

Nope, it's not a flashable zip, it's an img file.

That's what the thanks button is for, hint hint

OK, now to the important part: just connect your phone and try "adb reboot bootloader" if it works, great, go ahead and flash the new recovery.

If it doesn't, POWER OFF your phone, NOT RESTART, simply OFF. Once OFF press and hold VOL DOWN and POWER, when it turns on, let go of POWER and keep holding VOL DOWN. that will get you to bootloader, enter FASTBOOT connect to PC and it will change to FASTBOOT USB, then flash updated recovery.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wwhiterabbitt:
Wow.. after an all night of trying to fix this I got it. Thanks to your help. So i used your suggestion to replace CWM and it worked! But before I could even do that I had to be able to get to fastboot and I replaced the rom with a Sense rom that didnt use Aroma installer. And I was able to get back into fast boot. Thanks for everyones time!! :fingers-crossed:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rum0s:
Hi guys. My Titanium Backup licence file (txt) was not recognized on the sdcard. I tried almost everything. Uninstalled, reinstalled and so on. I also placed the file in the mnt/sdcard folder what didn't help.I owned serveral devices and never had a single problem. There must be something nexus specific?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rum0s:
Solved

Sry guys, I found out my License File was corrupted. Restoring the backup did it. --> Thread closed!?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rooster1973:
Having same issue on moto x 2014. Keep a copy on my computer and that's not working either.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] synesthete:
If you haven't already tried, try copying the license file to /data/media/legacy/ then close and restart Titanium Backup,
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bauskis81:
Hi All

I have to post here as I can't post in the official EchoeROM Forum for Galaxy Note 3 as I have posted less than 10 times :(

I'm having problem downloading "Echoe Settings and Kitchen for N3 EchoeSLIMv4 (MJ7 Base)" on this page echoerom.com/echoe-kitchen/note-3/

The zip file is incomplete and does not work, I have tried downloading it form two different computers and my phone and they have all failed.

Can I please ask friedrich420 to fix this problem? Oddly no one in the official Echoe forum has posted a problem with the file, so I'm a little confused??

I am an experienced computer user that has worked in IT for more than 10 years, so if I'm doing something wrong, then I'm not as bright as I thought I was :laugh:
[Nexus 5 Accessories] stuart0001:
If anyone's been using a QI charger then please enter your details in the my survey below. Hopefully it'll give a good idea of the best and most efficient.

Please carry out a 1 hour charge from near empty and note how much the battery percantage increases by. This can then be entered on the form

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1CdNCeUrPO1sfX6rsyNbeO28j1MDARfQrNwxLD-Zf5WQ/viewform

Any comments on the form content etc are welcome.

Live spreadsheet showing results as they come in

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnUP2wYpmnQWdHN3ZHhBSXJnWG0wSkdJQzlBVXhIZ0E&usp=sharing
[Nexus 5 Accessories] s_special:
Submitted
[Nexus 5 Accessories] Ionakr:
let us know the result! I'm interested in a QI charger and dunno wich one to buy
[Nexus 5 Accessories] Evil_munki:
Good idea, as I'm on a budget I wanted to know a good low priced charger and it's a minefield having a look online.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] stuart0001:
Live spreadsheet showing results as they come in

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnUP2wYpmnQWdHN3ZHhBSXJnWG0wSkdJQzlBVXhIZ0E&usp=sharing
[Nexus 5 Accessories] stuart0001:
Updated the survey. All feedback welcomed. Cheers :good:
[Nexus 5 Accessories] stuart0001:
I'm very sceptical about the results that say in excess of 50% per hour because that's what I get from the wired. Can anyone that's submitted these check again please.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] iOStoAndroid:
How does the rating system works?

1 is best or 5 is best?
[Nexus 5 Accessories] MojoCP:
I purchased this from amazon and have had it for about 3 days now.

I cant post the link, but the amazon label is "Docooler Qi Wireless Charger Transmitter Charging Pad/Mat/Plate for Nokia Lumia 920 Nexus 4/5 Patented Heat Dissipation (Black)" - it comes with the pad, a cable, and charger.

It works perfectly and it was nice that it came with its own, rather powerful, charger and cable. It appears to charge my Nex5 as quick or quicker than the factory plug. No problems, noise, etc.

There is a charging indicator light and a power light. I use this at the office so I can't say whether they'd keep someone awake in a dark room.

I was skeptical, since it appears to be quite cheap vs the competition, but I was pleasantly surprised.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] Clancy_s:
Results for Tylt VU added.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] evildave_666:
Need to change "Ease of finding sweet spot" for free-positioning chargers. They don't have one.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] Clancy_s:
Added LG Google Nexus 5 charger.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] Sonic Offline:
I am using this

I will be updating the spreadsheet when my phone dies. I found this thread this morning after I charged, so a couple days from now I'll update it.
[Nexus 5 Accessories] downwiththebanksters:
Wow, looking at my results of 18% in one hour, mine seems low. I started from 50% and it got to 68% in an hour. Others are getting 2 and 3 times that. I'm guessing those devices have smaller batteries than the N7.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro Software Upgrading] shunichi:
Hi all~

I find there is a ExtendedROM for Dopod 900 HK~

but how to use it?

those are near all cab file~

do I copy all of those to the xda and run the "auto run"?
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Aethera:
Not sure where to turn. Running pershoot's most recent cm-10-20130825-UNOFFICIAL-p4vzw on a Verizon Galaxy Tab 10.1 and there is no sound coming through the right speaker. No settings in DSP Manager seem to have any effect.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
Reflash back to stock and see if it works. Then flash cm10 again.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Crwys:
Can someone please link me to an 4.1 or lower rom for the Galaxy S4 if such one exists. I've been searching forever and have yet to find one
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Triscuit:
There is no such thing, the S4 was shipped with Jelly Bean
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] k1mu:
As noted, the S4 started on Jelly Bean. Also, unless you're running the MDK build, you will have very limited ability to flash custom ROMs.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Crwys:
Ok thanks. I know this has been asked over and over. Is there any way at all to use bluetooth controllers such as a wiimote on my phone?

My phone is already rooted and on a custom rom.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Triscuit:
I don't know if you can do it on the s4 but I used to be able to hook up my xbox controller to my Nexus 7 using USB OTG
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] reinaldistic:
as long as you are rooted most should work, I use six axis remote daily
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Crwys:
Thanks for the fast and useful replies. Its great to know that I can use some kind of wireless controller, guess I'll go and buy a ps3 controller.
[Nexus 5 General] br0adband:
Simple: because we can. ;)

And within 2 years we'll see 4K resolutions on such small panels as well so this is just scratching the surface (no pun intended) of hand-held touch-operated display technologies.
[Nexus 5 General] Zezrs:
The only thing I could practically see as useful is being able to display more content on the screen due to DPI scaling. Even still, I don't think it would be significant enough for the tradeoff of battery drain. And it is less than ideal managing a lot of content on such a small screen.

Maybe as video resolution increases, the displays will be able to offer a slight benefit with a higher resolution (beyond 1080p), however pointless it may be. Perhaps phones with video output could benefit by having a higher resolution being able to be displayed on a much larger screen? I am not sure if this is software or hardware dependent so it could be a null point.

Other than that, I suppose they are available because it is possible. As technology advances, more powerful hardware is needed to support/benefit from it and innovation and all that stuff follows leading to more advanced technology.

So if we do end up going beyond 1080p for phones, there is a chance that it will require other related resources to improve in order for it to be useful. I could see breakthroughs in battery life or efficiency being made to support whatever ridiculous and unnecessary resolution display that may be created.

Sorry if what I said irks anybody for whatever reason, just my opinion of the current situation with phones and HD displays so let's all just be happy :D
[Nexus 5 General] powruser:
I personally think it's noticeably sharper than my Nexus 4
[Nexus 5 General] ryude:
Just because you can't notice a difference does not mean you can speak for everyone.
[Nexus 5 General] BoneXDA:
5" is the borderline between 720p and 1080p. You can definitely notice the difference at 5.3", 5.5", 5.7", 6" etc., and most of us can see, albeit barely, the difference at 5", so why not get the 1080p goodie?

There are at least 2 benefits: subpixels are much more crowded so there are smaller gaps between them making a larger % of the screen covered (it makes a big difference!), plus no matter if you actually notice the difference, sharper image and more detailed text is more relaxing for your eyes to read.

I guess we could live with a 5" 720p screen, but the good news is: whatever technology debuted some 6 months ago, the Nexus line-up will get it for cheap. So the question is not why 1080p on a 5" LCD panel... but why not?
[Nexus 5 General] Ionakr:
Because the 720p is awful right now :) I'll see the difference in a lot of things. Like images, text, internet pages, icons.
[Nexus 5 General] coolnow:
I thought the same thing at first, but looking at the screen, it's much sharper than the Nexus 4, especially when it comes to reading. The new thing roboto font complements the resolution perfectly.
[Nexus 5 General] SykesAT:
The "why not", is fairly easy, battery life. As you said the difference in quality is borderline. All of those saying there is a massive difference, well science disagrees with you. What your eye can actually see is defined for the standard 20/20 vision. There is a definitely "shinny new" element, which in many does overpower the science behind what and eye can actually see. It's sort of the same argument for 4k TVs. View distance is key in both.
[Nexus 5 General] BoneXDA:
Experience very much shows that higher resolution screen does NOT result in higher battery drain. Relative to battery capacity, the Galaxy S4's bigger and higher res screen is far more efficient that the S3's, same goes for the HTC One to One X, LG G2 to Optimus G, and the Nexus 5 does better video playback than the Nexus 4 as well (this is the least CPU-dependant testing that tells the most about the screen). This is because like SoCs, AMOLED and LCD technology also evolved in efficiency.
[Nexus 5 General] SykesAT:
agreed, technology has evolved and become more efficient, but that does not address the power needs of the same gen tech when looking at 720p vs 1080p, nor viewing distances.
[Nexus 5 General] PhilipL:
Hi

Why not get a 1080P panel, battery life perhaps and better quality 720P? The problem with all those pixels is you have loads of extra transistors and wiring on the display, all that means less of the display is being used to transmit light. If they take the same lithography, i.e. smaller transistors and wires that are required to pack in 1920x1080 to a 5" inch display to a 720P 5" panel, so no gaps and more screen area transmissible to light, it would use less power to back light than 720P displays have used before and would look better and brighter for less battery power than an equivalent 1080P display.

Of course we will get 2k displays or even 4k displays on 5" diagonals, then what will happen is what is happening to mobile phone cameras, it will come a point where they can't add any more pixels (with mobile phone cameras they are down to only measuring a few photons at at time in each pixel hence you get very noisy pictures in poor light), so the next marketing trick to sell to us will be as HTC have done with their cameras, reduce the numbers then tell us that the lower number of pixels were all along better.:confused:

By the time most people have covered the display with smudges and dust during normal day to day use, they are not going to notice the difference between a 5" display at 720p and 1080p at normal viewing distances. I've had friends fail to notice the difference between 720P and 1080P on the Nexus 7 with a 7" display let alone a 5" one. One friend actually preferred the 720P panel as he said text looked more like a good computer monitor display and was easier to read!

Don't get me wrong I like the Nexus 5, but think it would have been better with longer battery life and a brighter and better display that would have been available using the same new LCD technology but in a 720P panel. This would also give better manufacturing yields, and so reduce the price of display, with the savings going towards better calibration and consistent displays between devices. There is already a thread about poor quality control with very warm yellow displays on some Nexus 5's yet another Nexus 5 sat next to it is bright white looking completely difference. So much for the benefits of 1080P when no two phones are guaranteed to look the same.

Regards

Phil
[Nexus 5 General] br0adband:
Today's 1080 smartphone displays typically use less power overall than the last generation models with 720 displays, believe it or not. Note when I'm saying this I'm leaning more towards the actual display tech itself and not the backlight: when you account for the power requirements of the panel itself (not counting the draw from the backlight) the 1080 panel on the Nexus 5 pulls less current than the 720 on the Nexus 4 (which is more accurately 1280x768 so it's technically a bit more pixels)

The backlight remains the largest draw of current in a smartphone today in typical usage - it's only when you begin to max out the CPU+GPU at the same time will that really begin to sway favor away from the backlight itself.

If I honestly had my choice, I'd have SuperAMOLED(+) tech in every device but the issue there is a) it tends to wash out in direct sunlight (not that I can't cover the device with my hand or something and see it and b) AMOLED dies over time since the organic aspects literally just wear out.

LCDs are still pretty nice in my opinion, and they get the job done just fine, but it sure would be nice to find a way to do a proper backlight that actually get the job done without that massive power requirement that remains attached to that technology even today.

Also, 720p and 1080p are technically video formats, but people just keep right on referring to them as resolutions... ;)
[Nexus 5 General] BoneXDA:
Read my post above. The Nexus 5 screen is not just higher res, it's brighter, more accurate AND more efficient, therefore it's clearly producing better user experience. Your friend has his opinion, but he'll find very few he'd agree that the Nexus 4's 720p screen beats the Nexus 5's 1080p, and that's the comparison that matters since the 5 is replacing the 4.

The Nexus 5's battery problem comes from the battery itself: at an ever so slightly thicker frame the G2 and Droid MAXX managed to pack in 3000mAh+, too bad Google didn't go for that. But the 5 has still better battery life than the 4, and the 1080p still has better efficiency.

Also, are you really complaining about the price of the 1080p display... on a $350 high-end flagship phone?
[Nexus 5 General] Yakandu:
because 'murica

thats all, we dont need more than 720p in less than 7", its inperceptible.. but yes we can.