yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Higadeb:
Has anyone else noticed that the recommended settings for the GPU governor (Simple) result in high GPU benchmarks but cause lag/stutter in Google's launcher. For example, when opening the app draw & swiping from left to right? The same stutter isn't there with ondemand.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Savant:
Don't have that problem but who knows.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] johnannis:
No it wasn't that, I already knew about those recommended settings and I already had that link. I just saw on his g+ photos that he had a lot of newer settings there but no titles about witch model they refer to. So I was curious if they were newer recommendations
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] willybarca:
show-p1984 uses one kernel for all and it includes f2fs as well, maybe you could use his setup to fix f2fs problem and use one kernel for everyone instead of making two ...
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] x1pitviper1x:
Screen going black

Whenever I reboot my phone or unlock it, the screen goes black or sometimes gets like a glitchy static screen for a second before opening up to my home screen on 014. Is anybody else running into this issue or know how to fix it? I turned set on boot to off for gamma control and rebooted with no change, so I flashed stock, then reinstalled 014 again, but still getting the same issue.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Breadwinka:
In having the exact same issue.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Cuzz1369:
Meee three!!!! Very annoying. At first I thought it was a bad combination of xposed modules. I spent all morning trying to find the cause. I forgot I flashed faux.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] faux123:
Fixed. Just wait for 192
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Cuzz1369:
Thanks, its very annoying.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] kokosk4:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/109078966818501160423/posts/gj2v8nVqqfP
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] giajp:
Too old man, look at the post of 5th march

Advice for those who doesn't play games.

Absolutely best compromise battery/smoothness

Sent with my Google Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
The phone stuck completely...i had to force reboot from power key....something on memory on last_kmsg but im not sure [MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION] can look at it!!!
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] phin586:
latest version seems to not allow me to boot. stuck at google screen.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] killersloth:
A lot of controversy over custom settings lol

I just flash the kernel and it works great ;) thanks [MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION]
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] b_rangel29:
So build 192 of fauxclock no longer has gamma control?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] faux123:
If you have fauxdisplay installed, fauxdisplay takes precedence ;)
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] b_rangel29:
Ok cool. I do have faux display installed. A proud new owner as of today. Just out of curiosity; if you only have fauxclock installed and not faux display, will it show gamma then? I'm thinking of installing it on my gf's n5 instead of using trickster.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] faux123:
Yes that's how it works
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
Anyone know what UID proximity sensor drain is? Lux,advance notifications or something else?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] monster598:
Same here...any word on a fix?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] impulse101:
Where are gamma controls in Fauxclock?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] JaylanPHNX:
In the future, unless you're part of the beta group. If you are on the latest FauxClock beta, it has its own tab.

From my Pro Tab 8.4
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] JaqaL06:
i am in beta group but can't find latest beta. where is it? i downloaded from play store. there is no option like gamma control :(

edit : found it sorry :)))
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] PJcastaldo:
Faux leaves everything at stock settings. So if you don't change stuff then your using stock settings that come on the device. No itelliplug or better governor or other included features.

---------- Post added at 03:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:19 PM ----------

With using only two cores all the time you don't notice any slowdowns?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
Anyone found a way to use faux on cm11?there was a thread for this but it's outdated

Σεντ φρομ μυ Νεχυς 5
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] montbazon:
You can't. Find another one.

나의 Galaxy Nexus 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
Is there any pure cm non can anywhere?

Σεντ φρομ μυ Νεχυς 5
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] johnannis:
I don't think I can understand what you are asking for...

Φαντάζομαι ουτε κανας άλλος, ξαναδοστω αλλη μια
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
If your telling me I'm asking for a pure cm but non can based

Σεντ φρομ μυ Νεχυς 5
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] GzC:
I bet you're asking about caf based kernel? If you want you can try elementalx kernel, his kernel have both caf & non caf based version.

Faux doesn't make caf based kernel, not at all.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
Im asking for a cm11 rom of course not the official that support aosp kernels....
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] GzC:
What...? Okay I'm confuse now. You description is too hard for me to understand. You want a caf kernel or non caf kernel? Or is it you want a rom that compatible with Faux's kernel?

Please state it crystal clear, else we can't help you.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
:) A cm rom that support non caf kernel....to explain a bit more...a cm rom with all the CAF addtions gone so it can work with aosp kernel....i dont want a kernel...i want a rom... :)
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] GzC:
Okay now I get it, you can just flash a aosp rom, then you can get faux's kernel to work. I recommend SlimKat, it's kinda great, stable, clean, simple & minimal, just like cm rom.

Edit:

Don't just stuck in cm rom, they're not like what they used to be since caf implemented.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
I like slim but i want the purity and stability of cm...thats why im asking for it....anyway...its ok...i will stay for now with cm stock kernel and i will see!!
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] GzC:
Well... you can have everything you want with slim rom. But if you like cm so much, it's your choice then. Hope they will remove the caf thingy in future. Everyone's happy. :D
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] ihatelolcats:
im on 14u and in the color/gamma tab it says no gamma support detected for this kernel. wat?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] El Nino1977:
Gamma tab works but the presets are a bit funky, they don't seem to apply as they should.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] iKlutz:
Nexus runs stock android better than any third party devices like them.. Cm and similar roms are for non stock android phones.. Stock is faster and more stable on nexus 5 than any cm based rom. Haven't checked in a while but cm sucked last time I tried (maybe November 2013 lol)..
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] anub1s18:
i had the same, i'd say give carbon a try though it's pretty great.

that being said i'm currently on slimkat 3.10 since it's the only rom i've flashed in the 3 days of ownership of the device that plays nice with faux's kernel and i'm slightly invested so i want to use it :P

carbon unfortunately had the dialer infinitely crash for some reason after flashing the kernel making it useless.

getting great results with slimkat so far, tweaking (undervolting) and stability testing a lot atm but 4h13m screen on time and 10.30h cpu foreground from antutu and 8h15m keepawake from sleepasdroid... granted it was locked at 300/422/652 Mhz most of the time for uv testing but my recently deceased hox would have never managed that :P
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] kufikugel:
Just out of curiosity why do you think slim is not stable compared to cm? First time I read such a statement lol
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
They are both great for their own reasons... Slim is feature rich but cm is more stable... More creative (their make their own launcher, camera and now theme engine) compared to other roms for now they are the best.. But I think cause cm is based on the idea that we add features that are 100% stable and don't cause bugs and unwanted drain and cpu hog... Just now I learn what a cpu hog is the status bar network speed.... All those are my opinuon ok... I'm not judging

Σεντ φρομ μυ Νεχυς 5
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] kufikugel:
Do not want to get OT here on faux thread but you are wrong. The philosophy is pretty similar. That's why slim since some time counts to the most stable ROMs. On stable 3.0 we got exactly 5 bug reports from 1000000 of users lol. And camera slim is doing an own version....dialer reverse lookup etc slim is doing..... Privacy guard manager slim is doing....slim recents etc etc. And about status bar network speed slim never had this and will never add it :D I am confused. Or were you on a port? Whatever of course everyone can use what they like. Just curious how you got this opinion.

Edit just to add it at least all the original development ROMs like cm pa slim are working in a similar direction with other main points. Cm focus a lot on hardware development and supporting non nexus phones. Pa focus a lot on fancy features....slim focus as well a lot on features. And you can find in every of this 3 development from the other three with same creativity. The picture is a bit more complex then just this or that ROM

Whatever let us stop the OT it is fauxs thread :D
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Tommy-Geenexus:
i experienced the opposite.

CM is mostly unstable, whereas Slim is rock solid.

And the new kernel is running great as always ;)

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 5 mit Tapatalk
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] PJcastaldo:
Also on 14u and Gama controls in faux clock app say its unsupported by my kernel.. had to download display control . But I'd prefer to use the faux app.. any ideas?

And on y'all comparing CM and Slim.. I've never used Slim and honestly I haven't used CM in quite a while.. unstable or not Cyanogen Mod is like the grandfather of Android Roms and pioneered many of the feature we all use today.. just saying.. I like Purity Rom my self..
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] pikachukaki:
I don't know if you are a slim dev but i never said that slim is worst rom... Thank God there is slim on kitkat and we see features... We still wait for PA to release their features... As an android user I always find cm to be more stable and more let's say professional.... Maybe I'm wrong cause I didn't use it alot when they switch to car cause of kernels... But slim is no 1 for now... But cm will always be cm

Σεντ φρομ μυ Νεχυς 5
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] kufikugel:
Ah I see now your point. Yes cm has build there whole ecosystem and environments way longer then any other custom ROM and established there whole system very well. Absolutely no ROM can do this in a short time or is even near what cm did. I know it from slim we needed nearly now 2 years to build a professional developer environments and a stable userbase (starts with gerrit, Jenkins, several own buildboxes, bug tracker, PR team, tester team, communication to user, lawyers to check what we are doing etc etc the list is sooo long) and we got a lot critic in the past for that (that we are slow in development etc) Well it needed about a year till we were recognized by user, custom ROM scene, some manufactures and to have a stable developer environment which still needs to be improved. That being said of course the future will show if this is constant and the right way. See eg omni they still have a long long way. This is simply nothing which can be done in short if your aim is to build a professional original development ROM which establish over a long time period. BTW this counts IMO for kernel development as well.

And no I did not get your post at all wrong. I think it is an interesting discussion (although in the wrong thread lmao) and wanted to know your opinion to see from user view if we can improve something. :)

Faux just leave a not if it is toooo much OT ;)
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] reaperofwaywardsouls:
Same here...
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] wp7chris:
Agreed cyanogenmod nightlies left my phone broken on almost a weekly basis. Slim weekly releases never give me any issues.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] impulse101:
I am in the beta and i don't see a tab for it
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Gustave17:
You need to allow beta test in Play store... After what you will have an update of faux clock/display

There is a link in faux app beta group

Envoyé depuis mon Nexus 5

Purity & Faux123
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] impulse101:
Like I said already subscribed to the beta weeks ago
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Higgsy:
Same here I have been subscribed for months and don't get a tab for gamma. I did have Franco's display app installed but I have uninstalled that and also installed and reinstalled faux clock but still the same. I also opt out/back into the beta testing and still the same. Not sure if I am missing something.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] reaperofwaywardsouls:
I made a backup of faux clock's settings then wiped the app data + cache. Rebooted, restored and then gamma worked for me.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Globespy:
So FauxClock v192 is out, does kernel v14u work without issue? Can anyone confirm? I'm loving the yellow reliability and battery of v13u but miss being able to boot to recovery without shutting down the phone and entering manually.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] ashwin988:
I just installed 14u over 12u and the reboot to recovery works fine :). I am on purity rom. Give it a try
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] PJcastaldo:
After faux clock update gamma controls work. :D
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] impulse101:
Still not showing for me, not gamma tab. What is ver# of the current beta?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Higgsy:
Got the gamma tab now, found my ROM was not booting to recovery when flashing the kernel its was just rebooting there phone ( I don't watch the flashing process usually) so I was actually still on kernel version 13u I think restored a backup from last week and manually flashed 14u and now gamma tab shows. Loving the jetlitheone_2.3_gamma preset.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] iraqi92:
im flashed on Beanstalk and get boot loop..why..?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Berlino:
Same here...tried 14u on Beanstalk -> bootloop, 13u works fine for me.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] iraqi92:
what about battery on 13u...?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Berlino:
Compared to 12u I can't see any difference with same settings - it's good for me.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] SLBoy:
Does fauxsound work on youtube for you guys?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Manuelpz:
Is that normal that when idling and screen off the battery drain is high .. I mean 2-3% per hour .. C0 C1 C2 C3 enabled, power suspend enabled and UV by -75 everything else stock .. S2w dt2w enable I am using v14u stock rom using Art.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Globespy:
What changed between 13u and 14u other than bug fixes?

I've done some pretty detailed usage testing between these two kernels.

Things after 7/8m went downhill (10m OK but had screen lag), then 13u was back to great battery life and solid performance, also the screen lag when hitting the power button after a period of non use went away on 13u. Apart from the inability to boot to recovery, it was pretty darn perfect - 5.5+ hours screen on time every day.

I've gone back and forth between 14u/13u several times and 14u is MUCH tougher on battery use, phone runs noticeably warmer, getting 3-3.5 hours SOT even after 4 power cycles doing usual stuff like email/web/YouTube. Flashing back to 13u (or 8m) gives an immediate bounce back to 5+ hours SOT.

Nothing else changes on my phone so we can rule out rogue apps etc. It's an immediate change that's clearly kernel related.

I could just go back to V8 and be done with it, but I've invested so much in to sticking with Faux kernels since way back in the day that I'd like to benefit from the new governors and features, so I'm hoping this feedback is taken as constructive as that's the intention in which it's written. For instance I've bought all Fauxs apps including faux display which is not available on earlier kernel versions??

So what else changed between 13u and 14u other than the bug fixes to have such a dramatic effect on phone efficiency and performance?

---------- Post added at 10:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:46 AM ----------

No it's not normal... Something in 14u is molesting the battery.. See my thread above this, it didn't happen before.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Demonic240:
What settings are you using? I can never get 5 hours of SOT.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Globespy:
Hi.

Intellidemand 1.728Ghz max/300Mhz min/snake charmer on

Voltage -50

GPU 320Mhz max, simple

CPU Idle C0, C1 and C3 - disabled power suspend in misc to avoid any lag that some people noticed

Fiops/1024

I don't use sweep2wake, same page or low memory kill.

On kernel v8 and v13 consistently between 5-5.5 hours, mostly Wi-Fi. V13 might be a little less, but still over 5 hours SOT and much more responsive - it's my favorite kernel other than the boot to recovery option being broken - I'll live with it until Faux figures out what's gone so wrong in v14. Wish he could just take another look at v13 and only change the reboot to recovery part as it's his best work to date for the N5 IMHO.

I also use the amazing app 'Lux' which adjusts screen brights dynamically and likely is a huge help.

Hope that helps.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] JaylanPHNX:
It's the s2w and dt2w. There's no way to do those on the N5 without keeping the entire digitizer on the whole time. Turn those off and see if it doesn't make a huge difference.

From my Pro Tab 8.4
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Manuelpz:
I agree but I thought power suspend feature was like Elementalx that disable s2w dt2w and battery doesn't get drain. Thanks for your reply
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Higgsy:
Sweep to wake etc are battery killers for sure. This kernel is awesome for battery life I had 7hrs 50mins sot over 18hrs on battery the other day, I couldn't believe it - highest I've ever had.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] faux123:
flar2 has added a feature where it turn off the digitizer after a few minutes. This sorta defeats the knock knock feature (but saves battery life)... because once you enable this feature, you can only wake from power button again.

So far there's NO good solution to s2w and dt2w features. either you have it on all the time at the cost of 2~3% drain per hour regardless of usage or have it off after the "grace period" but needing the use of power button....

My recommendation right now is to DISABLE all S2w / DT2w features if battery life is important to you... (to me it's the number 1 priority.. so I DON'T use these features at all even with other phones with working drivers).

BTW, My development PC is dead... it's boot looping at the BIOS (same as boot looping in fastboot in phone jargon... so it's hard bricked :( )
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] k20-:
Boot loop on Beanstalk with 014u (no ART). HELP please.

Change log says

- Release 014 (03/26/2014)

* fixed reboot issues

http://faux.romhost.me/hammerhead/kk44/changelog.txt

I was wondering if anyone else gets the same issue.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Manuelpz:
Faux thanks for your reply:thumbup:
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] muyoso:
Both my Nexus 7 and Nexus 5 get absolutely destroyed with regards to battery life when using the latest faux kernel. Pretty good standby performance, but then once I start using it the battery is in free fall. No clue. . .

Undervolted, stock clocks, GPU locked to 200mhz. No s2w or anything. Going to try reverting to stock kernel for a few days and see if that helps or if I have some crazy app running wild. BBS shows nothing abnormal which is why I'm stumped. Just generic Android System running roughshod over my battery on both devices.

I also remember being so impressed with how little battery life Google Music used months ago with a previous faux kernel while playing tracks on the device, but now it just obliterates my battery. No clue. Perhaps many of these issues are related to running Paranoid Android on both devices?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Globespy:
Faux Display Settings gone?

I've been going back and forth between kernel v8 and v13/14 and noticed that even though I'm on v13 I don't have any faux display setting in FauxClock? Is this only applicable to v14? If so, can't wait for an update without the poor battery in v14, which is why I'm back on v13 even though it babe reboot to recovery.

I'll use Franco's color display app until then I guess...
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] faux123:
Not sure why this is happening... I'm getting amazing battery life with super multi-tasking enabled. Normally when you have more apps running, it will drain more battery but version 14 has incorporated quite a number of optimizations... Right now my phone is 1 day 3 hours @ 50% battery with 1+ hour of screen on time with EVERYTHING enabled (no greenify, no xposed, etc) on automatic brightness. I typically get around almost 2 days of usage with 2.5~3 hours of screen time with LOTS of Google Play Music (which I use every day to/from work with 40 min drive each way!) I am using my OWN recommended settings posted on G+

Can you use betterbatterystats and see what is killing your battery?
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] faux123:
Do you have fauxdisplay installed? Remember, FauxClock will disable its own Gamma control if fauxdisplay is installed to prevent conflicts
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] muyoso:
Yea, its confusing the hell out of me. Better Battery Stats isn't showing anything really abnormal. No major kernel wakelocks or partial wakelocks. It doesn't seem to be a wakelock issue because I get pretty good standby performance out of both devices, but its like when I am using the devices the battery is in freefall. Going to fiddle some more and see if I can narrow down the cause. Probably something stupid I did. I do miss the days of 9+ hours of screen on time out of the Nexus 7, whereas now I get 5.5 if I am lucky. Could just be a degredation in the battery capacity, although I doubt it would be that severe. Thanks for the quick reply.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] Globespy:
Yup... Same for me. Both BBS and system panel door tell me much either.

Faux, what ROM are you using? Seems that there's more people reporting issues with this kernel version than those saying it's awesome?

Any chance you could release an r2 of v13 with the reboot to recovery fixed and access to faux display without any of the changes in v14? It's such a good kernel.
[Nexus 5 Original Android Development] muyoso:
I am not absolutely sure its the kernel and not the rom I am using. All I know is that the combination of PA and Faux Kernel on both the Nexus 7 and Nexus 5 are causing battery issues. Could be the rom or could be the kernel. Going to try a day with the stock PA kernel on both devices and see if anything changes, and then if nothing does try switching roms. Almost suspect its a rom issue at this point.