yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
Awesome. Now i just gotta find the kernel and i am off to the races. Muchas gracias!

---------- Post added at 11:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:50 PM ----------

I found a German site which lists a Linux kernel 3.4.63 and a 3.4.63.sign. Are these kernels the right thing and which should I use? I am leaning towards the 3.4.63, but don't want to brick my phone. Thanks in advance.

Note: i don't seem to be able to dl the kernel. Just see the code. Hmmmmm
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] mwhitt:
The link to the kernel is in the aoip thread
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
Yes, buried somewhere in the 100+ pages of the aoip thread. I'll find it. Just gotta put on my helmet light and go spelunking. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] mwhitt:
I've had to do it many of times
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
I ended up going with lkspooky's PRE-kernel version of 3.4.63. Other than a panicked moment when I couldn't see how to reboot into recovery mode (solved by a quick look at the Slimroms website) and a loss of my Bootes ringtone (I really liked just the single tone), this combo looks pretty good. Thank you AD, for suggesting it. Installation took no time at all, which speaks to the small size of the rom, not to mention all the freed up disk space. We'll see how long the battery lasts, but if it's like all the other 4.2 roms I've used, it should be fine, plus I get my custom battery level indicator, back. All in all, pleased so far.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
Dude glad you're liking the setup. I finally got around to running V6 and installing the services.jar file. It's nice that this ROM has init.d support that works too so I don't have to use the Universal init.d support app that can't run longer scripts. Everything is working together nicely. Hope things stay like this because if they do I will end my run with this device using this ROM. I have a feeling with the holiday sales coming up I will find a good deal on a better phone that I won't be able to pass up. This January would mark 2 years with this phone.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
BTW no need to do all that, if you go to http://www.blownco.com you can browse Cam's files for things like the kernel or look at our other devs' folders for archives (Tim1928 or Smart Guy). I feel safe about saying that now they are done with this device and not uploading test builds anymore.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
That's true. I could go to blownco, but what fun is being efficient? It all worked out, and I don't see any phones out there, other than the dinc 4g, which have everything I need. That one is harder to root, from what I read. Gonna have this phone for a while.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
Yeah that's why the next device for me will still either be along the lines of the S2 or Galaxy Nexus. Older phones with better hardware than the Exhibit that have tons of development.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] mwhitt:
I have to say that the s4 is a awesome device, not one disappointment yet, but I still find myself dwelling the exhibit threads, in the s4 threads I feel like the new kid in school, much friendlier crowd here.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
If I was getting a contract an S4 might be an option, otherwise it would be too expensive to buy without one. The other thing is the size is really a little too big for me as well. A five inch screen is overkill, I'm looking for closer to four inches and no bigger than 4.3.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
I'm with AD. The S4 is just too big. It's nice having the latest hardware, but no bigger than a 4.3 screen. Replaceable battery and sd card would be nice, but I think those are going the way of the dinosaur.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] mwhitt:
The s4 has a removable battery and a sd card spot
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
Ah. I did not know that. I thought both were hard wired on the S4. Good. Maybe Samsung listens to customers, after all. Still too big for me, though.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
The penultimate setup for the Exhibit

Ok anybody that does the following will never look back (revised)

1.Use the latest AOKP by [MENTION=4525591]smartguy044[/MENTION]: http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-jb-20130812-signed.zip

3. Flash [MENTION=4450173]camcory[/MENTION]'s 3.4.63 kernel: http://www.blownco.com/index.php/doc_download/13656-3-4-63-whitescreen-fix-4-2

4. Set CPU to "ondemand" gov, "SIO" I/O, min 245, max 1.4

5. Turn off all animations in developer options.

6. Download RAM Expander, select optimal but after swap file installs, set swappiness to 90 (make sure you are using a class 10 SD card).

7. Manage Ram with Ram Manager.

Now feel the 4orce!
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] meekrawb:
Or, the T989 is only $250 on Amazon.

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
Sure does save a lot of work doesn't it? :-p BTW the S2 is $192 on T-Mobile's web site, refurbed.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] mwhitt:
My buddy loves his s2
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Doobski:
I just went back to TIm's Slimbean ROM and used Chimera JB 4.2 V.2 kernel. I am not disappointed, it's very snappy
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
Yeah oddly enough I tried DBK 3.0 and Chimera for the hell of it, both made the ROM lag really bad. Glad it works for you though!
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
Works great! Thank you!
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
May I have to take this back, having problems with SD card mounting (internal) and starting to get some freezing. Oh well soon I will be free of this! Anywho for the time being going to try [MENTION=4525591]smartguy044[/MENTION]'s AOKP an see where that leads. Just something that will get me by for another week or two.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] smartguy044:
dont use anything by me as its all old and outdated im sure it will not be impressive
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
Haha! Sometimes the old ways are better than the new ones! Anyway I should know after all this time nothing will be perfect when it comes to this device. It's a true Jekyll and Hyde. One day everything is great, the next it's a train wreck. For the record AOKP works great with the new kernel, only oddity is that system sounds from the Nexus 5 play distorted for some weird reason. I'm sure later the phone will crash, bootloop or blow up. When I think back about all the posts I've made over the past 1 year and a 1/2 how many times did things seem utopian only to become Jonestown later? I posted in the general I'm getting an S2 anyway, so my "national nightmare" will soon be over.

Edit: figured out the problem with the Nexus 5 sounds, they are processed at 48khz while all the other OGG files are 44.1. Tried to fix it but the 48khz files will not play without distortion even with audio libraries replaced with the ones from AOIP. So I just went ahead and removed the Nexus 5 sounds. The ROM was snappy all day and in the end I'm going for performance, functionality & convenience at this point.

This is IT for this device as I am fatigued with flashing ROMs on this thing, especially with the final days drawing near. I'm going to leave this OS on here when/if this device gets handed off to someone else too. It would sure be better than putting stock back on it! You did a good job on this [MENTION=4525591]smartguy044[/MENTION].

BTW "Intellidemand" for scheduler and "row" for I/O are working slightly better than "ondemand" and "sio". Battery is as good as it gets for 4.2 which is an added bonus. Ironic to find something that is so "peaceful" now that my run is almost done with this. Of course I have to say AOIP 1.5 is pretty damn good also.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] Proud2banoob:
I see that you switched to AOKP, but I think I'm gonna stay with Slimbean for now, once I resurrect my phone. It was working great with that rom. If I start having problems, I will switch to AOKP.... Plus, I'm using a revision of the kernel, so as to get the better boot screen. Personal preference.
[Samsung Galaxy Exhibit 4G] ArtfulDodger:
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. :-p
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] llewelld:
Hi Guys,

I have a GS3 i9350, that has just started doing some weird stuff. Currently, I cant turn it on at all, (have unplugged the battery), and when I connect a charger, even this doesnt change anything. (no light comes on).

It did this last week, and I thought I must have water damaged it. (maybe sweat in pocket etc) - didnt really get it wet as such.

Two days after the first time, it came back on... I was actually just about to list it on ebay as damaged spares, but it fired back up and worked great.

Then yesterday after a full day of working great, I put it on flight mode last night, and this morning, it wouldnt turn on, and it wont charge..

very weird. Have tried a 2nd battery to no avail.

The issue has co-incided with me changing the kernel to Googy max (currently 75mv undervolted), but if this was causing it (wouldnt the charge light still come on even if it wouldnt boot ) or could it be kernel related?.

A bit bizzare.. does it just seem like an intermittent hardware fault or could software kernel / undervolt issue?

FYI I was able to run for most of a full day @ 75mv undervolt with no issues.

Have also pulled apart and made sure all ribbon cables etc are securly connected / screen etc, no clear signs of anything wrong.

Thanks.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boomboomer:
Standard answer, go back to full stock.

You're also posting in the wrong forum, there is a specific one for your model.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ian619420:
If I sell or let someone borrow my contract s4 phone and they put their sim card in, will any like call data text rates be applied to my bill for the person who is using it rather than me? Or will i just pay regulary for unlimited call text/ 4gb data. Will the persons sim card activate their data phone plan? Or will it be mine that is activated?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] malybru:
Hi,

Your phone company only knows what your sim card is doing,not which phone it's in.

:)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] gamedic12112:
I've tried all the root methods I can find and I still can't get my vzw i605 with MC3 rooted. Any help?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] droidstyle:
you could try flashing root66 in odin, download voodoo ota root keeper, then OTA back to MC3?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] okoboji1:
Go to the general section, scroll down just a little and you will see how to root, unlock, and restore videos by tomsgt...if you follow the directions on there you shouldn't have any issues.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] gamedic12112:
Finally got it. Never could get it to work with windows 8. Booted ubuntu 12.04 from usb and done. Just another reason why I love Linux.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Frank1947:
Root i605 Note 2 Troubles

Make sure all Anti Virus Software is off. Make sure no Shields appear on the bottom of your screen. Check your Control Panel for any programs that will stop any downloads that look like a Virus. Once you do that make sure you have the Samsung Composite driver on the computer. And if you have a Camera Cable with a Micro Connection use the shorter Cable. Also I did not find Causual to be a ONE STEP PROCESS. I had to acknowledge one screen that was when the phone went through the first process and rebooted have to acknowledge the ROOT SCREEN to allow the next process to continue. So when the phone reboots MAKE SURE YOU PAY ATTENTION to what the SCREEN asks you to do. It took me awhile to figure out what the problems where and its not the Casual Software Adam did a great job. Frank mypenneys@hotmail.com
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] Brezel:
Hello,

I have problems with different applications under Windows Mobile 5.0. When i try to run them i get the following error.

The file 'foo' cannot be opened. Either it is not signed with a trusted certificate, or one of its components cannot be found. You might need to reinstall or restore this file.

Is there anyway of disabling the checks for trusted applications in Windows Mobile 5.0 on the Wizard?

Does this help? (From Windows Mobile Blog)

This post will be a quick reference to the application security model in WM 2005. I'll gloss over some fine details in order to cover the broad points.

For CreateProcess() or running any executable

First, examine the signature on the binary. The three possibilities are that it is signed privileged, signed unprivileged, or unsigned. (determined by checking the Authenticode signature)

If signed by cert that chains to Privileged Execution Authorities store:
App runs privileged(CeGetCurrentTrust() == 2)

Else if signed by cert that chains to Unprivileged Execution Authorities store:
If device is one-tier (policy 4123 == 1)
App runs privileged.
else (two-tier)
App runs unprivileged. (CeGetCurrentTrust() == 1)

Else if app is unsigned
If unsigned apps are blocked (policy 4102 == 0)
App fails to load. (returns NTE_BAD_SIGNATURE).
Else if the device prompts, and the prompt times out or the user presses No
App fails to load.
Else if we are configured not to prompt (policy 4122 == 1) or the user accepts the prompt
If device is one-tier
App runs trusted.
else (two-tier)
App runs untrusted.

Greetings,

Brezel
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] vijay555:
This is from the wiki. It works on the Universal, should work on WM5 generally I guess:

Allow the unsigned app from installing for everything.

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Secutiry\Policies\Policies] Change value 0000101a from 0 to 1
Do a soft reset.

I think that's just for installing, not running. Tell me if it works.

V
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] Koksie:
On my Wizard that key already has a value 1, perhaps I should change it to 0 to get this effect? have no app to install right now, but will try if I install next time.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] xp:
because..

..wizard has much older version of ROM than Universal. The old ROMs of Universal has the value 1 too..
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] Brezel:
I changed the following registry values

HKLM\Security\Policies\Policies\00001001 = 1 (RAPI)
HKLM\Security\Policies\Policies\00001005 = 40 (Cert)
HKLM\Security\Policies\Policies\00001017 = 144
HKLM\Security\Policies\Policies\0000101B = 1
HKLM\Security\Policies\Policies\0000101B = 0
HKLM\Security\Policies\Policies\00001006 = 1

Those values change nothing at all. The only difference is that i am not asked to allow installation of non certified applications. My problem, however, is not the installation, which works, but the application. Whenever i try to run it i get the error mentioned above. It is just not possible to run certain applications without certificate.

Greetings,

Brezel
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] easycure1974:
I got the exact error and have asked for help on this forum and on HowardForum without any luck
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] V-Ger:
You could re-sign the application using your own code signing certificate and add your certification authority certificate to trusted root certificate authorities on your WM5 device. :wink:
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] daern:
I tried this, but without success. I already have my own root cert installed on the device (for SSL Activsync) and that works fine, but the app still won't work as a "signed app" :-(

Have you got this working?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] V-Ger:
Yes I tried it and it works!

1.First you have to issue a Code signing certificate:

- Add a code signing template using Certification Authority snap-in

- Issue a code signing certificate

2. Download and Extract code signing tools:

http://ftp.intron.ac/pub/security/raw/codesigningx86.exe

3. Run signcode.exe on WM5 executable file using the certificate you created earlier.

4 Copy executable file to WM5 device
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] daern:
I did create a code-signing cert in Certsrv, but I must have cocked something up. I will try again this afternoon and let you know.

Thanks for the help :-)
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] daern:
Ok, this is what I did (and it still didn't work):

1) Installed my own trusted-root CA onto my Mini S by opening the .cer file. This bit definately works as I'm able to sync my email with Exchange over SSL and this doesn't work unless the correct root cert is installed

2) Added a code-signing template in certservices with default settings. (Custom templates are not allowed in my Windows Std edition :-( )

3) Using IE, create a code-signing cert with default settings. Also export the private keys into a PVK file.

4) Using cert2spc, convert the cer file to an spc file

5) run signcode -spc cert.spc -v privkeys.pvk filetosign.exe ("Result successful with warning about file not being timestamped)

6) Copy .exe to device and run - still whinges about unknown publisher

Bah. Any suggestions as to what I'm doing wrong?

Daern
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] easycure1974:
I have the same very irritating problem.

1.First you have to issue a Code signing certificate:

- Add a code signing template using Certification Authority snap-in

- Issue a code signing certificate

How do I do that ?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] daern:
Ah. More success now. I've switched to using "signtool.exe signwizard" and that has enabled me to get it working...
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] daern:
Bugger. Too quick off the mark. It's still not working. Arrrrrgh!
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] V-Ger:
[WIN2k3 Server]

START/All Programs/Administrative Tools/Certification Authority

SERVER/Certificate Templates/New/Certificate Template to Issue

http://servername/certsrv

-Request a Certificate

-advanced certificate request

-Create and submit a request to this CA

-Certificate Template: Code Signing

[leave default settings]

-SUBMIT
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] easycure1974:
Thank you - shall try and if that could help me solve this annoying problem !
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] daern:
Are you *absolutely* sure that this works? I am now sure that I am doing this right, but I don't believe that apps signed against a certificate that only exists in the public root store (i.e. the one used for SSL connections) will be accepted as "valid". I've tried every way I can think of getting this to work, but with no success :-(

When I posted to say that it was working, what I actually saw was PPC recognising a file with a different file name, but the same CRC as a file that I had already said "Yes, I know it's unsigned. Run it anyway". Even though the new file was a different name, WM2005 ran it anyway without comment, as it assumed (correctly) that it was the same file with a different name... As I haven't yet found a way to make WM2005 forget the exes that I have accepted (I assume it's in the reg somewhere) I have now resorted to recompiling the same exe each time, but with different resource data, thus ensuring it's always different!

What device are you using to test this? I wonder if your derivative of the HTC Wizard has different certs installed than mine (UK O2 XDA Mini S)

Would it be possible for you to send me a sample .exe and your own root cert for me to test on my device. At least then I'll know if it's my device or my technique that is causing me problems ;-)

Thanks

Daern
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] V-Ger:
Yes, I am positive it works. I am using Universal (Qtek 9000), but that shouldn't make any difference.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] tinyau01:
Besides the error message after each soft reset.

I can still install many software and use it smoothly.

Haven't seen any other problem yet.

What is the certificate about?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] shoshone:
At the risk of appearing as a heretic..is there any way that this problem (which I get when clicking on any hyperlink) is related to the SdkCerts.CAB installed as part of ozVGA?

Dumb idea I know however I have no idea of what that CAB did. Can I somehow remove its effects just to prove it isn't the cause? ..hope this isn't off topic.

J
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] andrew.moiseenko:
Hi!

I would like to sign my application with a real certificate (to avoid error message during software installation). So, where I can get a real certificate? What is the procedure?

Thank you very much!
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario General] acme:
@andrew.moiseenko

Have you a answer to you question? i need a real cerificate too..
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] SlimJ87D:
I just received the Moko case and it has a magnet that turns our device on and off. But I've heard talks of the magnets ruining the digitizers.

I don't understand how this can happen if the Samsung covers have magnets in addition to our tablets having a setting to interact with magnets. Perhaps it depends on what the magnet is rated at?

Could anyone share or educate me on any risk I have using the Moko case that has a magnet?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] gina$zanboti:
Uh... I just ordered a Moko case with that feature and now I'm beginning to worry... Hopefully someone will post saying, "No, it won't affect the digitizer at all because (insert reliable information)."
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] madsquabbles:
they say it can, but won't if properly shielded. I don't know who "they" are but they lurk around these here internets. I haven't had any problems yet on my note 8 with a poetic case.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] uiterlix:
Interfering... could be. Ruining seems unlikely to mee. See the discussion in this thread http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2288809
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] haterbait:
I just got this case too. There's only supposed to be 1 magnet, right? Also, is there some way to position the stand to hold the tablet in more than 1 position? Thanks.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] ChrisNee1988:
There's 2 magnets and you can use it in 2 position but one of them puts the tablet upside down
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] haterbait:
Place the tablet upside-down? Ahh! I see now. You just blew my mind! So there's not supposed to be a magnet on the upper left corner? I feel a indentation there, and it would probably help hold the cover closed, but nothings there. Thanks for the help. As simple as flipping the tablet over is, I might not have realized it for days.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] CircleSquare:
I don't have a magnet there either
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] ikecomp:
I was afraid of this problem as well and I also just received the Moko case. The first thing I did once I got the case was remove the magnets using an exacto knife. There are 5 in total. There are 4 rectangular magnets where the case flap and the case touch (2 on the edge of the case flap and 2 on the edge of the case itself). I presume they are there for keeping the case closed. Then in the center of the case flap there is a round magnet which I assume is used for the actual wake/sleep feature.

I understand removing the magnets was a little extreme but I only plan to use this case until there is an otterbox defender case made available for it.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] gina$zanboti:
I'll probably wind up doing this too. I'm waiting for the Zenus case.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] uiterlix:
Aren't you guys acting a bit paranoid when even cutting the magnets out of the case. I yet have to find the fist discussion thread or post in which someone confirms permanent damage. And I did quite some extensive googling on the subject. So just post the sites/threads or stop scaring each other.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] SlimJ87D:
Did you not read the 4th post of people showing the note 8.0 with dead spots where they can't write?

I had the note 8.0 though and from my memory since it didn't have options and settings to utilize a magnetic cover I think that is the reason why some note 8.0 are getting messed up.

I don't know what will happen but that's why I have a free 2 year warranty so I don't really care.