yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 General] KachowPow:
I agree with the comments above the title is misleading and should be moved to "General" as this form of Root has already been released and discussed by the Developer that discovered it> credit should go to designgears. As for Unlocked this is confusing and misleading as how it is stated in title of thread, as there is a difference between a Modem or SIM unlock vs a Bootloader Unlock. I think while it is safe to say, considering we have a Bounty running in the General section that has been there for quite some time, the method of Unlock we are mainly most interested in is a Bootloader Unlock, therefore using the words Unlock in the Title should have been done more tastefully> OP welcome to XDA!
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 General] mwebb34:
Interesting
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 General] popi09:
The Verizon note 3 is factory unlocked already. There's really no need to pay for it to be unlocked. I inserted my wife's T-Mobile prepaid Sim card in and got signal. Of course I was only able to get G instead of their 3G/4G. Works for AT&T as well.
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 General] bh805:
that's true if you got it activated first with Verizon, from my reading the net, it'd be locked unless it's first activated with the intended provider (Verizon), my problem was I could not get it activated with Verizon so I had to those things and seems to work now.
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 General] TechBSwift:
the phone is unlocked but no the bootloader, you need to clearly state region free instead of unlocked.
[Verizon Galaxy Note 3 General] LillieBennett:
When you switch sim does your phone number change as well or just data?

Lillie via LG Spectrum & tapatalk
[Sony Xperia M] ManzzaShahi:
It has been confirmed that unlocking the bootloader will infect and damage TA partition of Xperia M and you will lose your DRM keys forever:eek::eek: and loose warranty too..

So it is necessary to backup your TA partition before unlocking the bootloader. After that we can always restore the TA partition and get the warranty back.

For this purpose DevShaft has created a tool that will help you backup the TA partition.So give him a thanks for his awesome work.

For more info you can check out his thread his thread

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2292598

:):)

How to??

1.Download Backup TA tool (https://github.com/DevShaft/Backup-TA/tags) thank to DevShaft after you download!!

2.Extract it and connect your device to pc normally

3.Double click and run Backup-TA.bat

4.Follow on screen procedure.

5.Do what you want backup or restore from it.

When you want to restore your TA partition make sure you are on stock kernel and rom to avoid further problems.

Good Luck:D:D

Note:Never restore TA partition from another similar or even a same model device cause it will hard brick yours.:good: Every device has its own TA partition!!!
[Sony Xperia M] Antrikos48:
There was another thread like this. Anyway we need to get a mod to pin either one.

This message was brought to you by my Sony Xperia M (C1905), using the XDA app.
[Sony Xperia M] villacelt:
asidspa Sacred

Is the stock ROM available on SE site?
[Sony Xperia M] thirdzcee:
Woah.. Good thing I was looking around a little more... Just got my xperia m (my first xperia phone) yesterday and crossflashed 4.2.2 from dual firmware now planning to unlock the bl... This post deserves a ton of thanks for newbies planning to unlock their bl
[Galaxy Ace S5830i General] praveenbablu:
Krish 3 is a Indian movie.now.krish 3

game is released for windows devices.it is soon releases for android & ios devices.we can play that game in our ace.here is trailer link" m.youtube.com/watch?v=kO2vLU2p1ys&guid=&hl=en&client=mv-google&gl=IN"
[Galaxy Ace S5830i General] iamareebjamal:
Was there an absolute need of creating a thread for this?
[Galaxy Ace S5830i General] -HellRaiser-:
lol maybe he is a die hard krish fan...

Sent from Microwave with KitKat 4.4
[Galaxy Ace S5830i General] praveenbablu:
I just asking that we can run that game in our device?
[Galaxy Ace S5830i General] iamareebjamal:
Then you should've done that in Questions and Answers Section. Don't you think?
[Galaxy Ace S5830i General] praveenbablu:
Sorry for my post in wrong section
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] gekkeabt:
Hey all!

A friend of mine got his Xperia Z1, seriously jealous about the camera :)

I miss some of the functions in the Note 2 like AR and easier selection of a best picture. Can someone possibly port the Camera app so it can fit in my Note 2?

Thanks in advance, I hope someone will make it ;)

Cheers,

Ahmed
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] fonsigno:
+1

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] albuster:
+1
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] tariqso:
+1
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] indrajeet007:
Z1 has a different camera specs... and more over porting its camera app wil require sources from sony itself which they won't provide so easily... so hence its very difficult to port... rather not possible at moment..
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] topbasework:
try ask [MENTION=444264]rizal[/MENTION] Lovin

myb he can help..
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] gekkeabt:
Tnx for recommendation.

You mean http://xdaforums.com/member.php?u=4666531 ?

Because he hasn't a Xperia Z1, should I still ask him?
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] topbasework:
yup this person...i heard he can port any sony app to samsung...
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] priji85:
+1

+1
[Windows 8 General] Shivammcool:
I know I know, use Chrome as my main browser and I've recently downloaded Firefox. But sometime today i have realized that I do not have IE11 (I have Windows 8.1) installed. Perhaps I uninstalled it or something has happened. I want to know how to install back another IE11. I have check microsoft's Website: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-ca/internet-explorer/download-ie and I have got nothing. I then was looking through my Program Files I found that my IE folder was still there. There was something called iexplore.exe (as seen in my screenshot) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa741312.aspx and I want to know if that app will install my IE back? Even thoug it is not critical, I would still like to know how to get it back. Thanks.
[Windows 8 General] SixSixSevenSeven:
iexplore.exe is internet explorer, you cannot uninstall internet explorer without breaking windows. All you have done is deleted the shortcut or disabled it from add/remove windows features.
[Windows 8 General] Shivammcool:
Oh, OK. So well, i think I have disabled it then. Do you know how to renable it?

I have included a screen shot of something. Is this what you are talking about? Cause it is stilled check and no IE.
[Windows 8 General] SixSixSevenSeven:
You are sure that you havent simply deleted the shortcut?

Go to the start screen. Just type "internet explorer"
[Windows 8 General] Shivammcool:
Yeah, im sure.
[Windows 8 General] SixSixSevenSeven:
so typing internet explorer gave you nothing?
[Windows 8 General] stevedebi:
Type <WIN> + R. In the run dialog, type in iexplore. When IE shows up, see what version it is.
[Windows 8 General] Shivammcool:
Man I see you. Good Job. Thanks a lot. So after running iexplore I came up with IE11, as seen in the screen shot below, thanks to you. Now, why is it not under my apps or programs? As seen in my screen shots it does not show up when i type internet explorer but it does when I type iexplore. Could you explain that?

PS. I also like your confidence, by saying "When IE shows up...". You know that it must still be installed. Awesome
[Windows 8 General] stevedebi:
You never lost the program; IE is built into windows, and Windows won't run without it. I'm not sure what happened to your apps shortcut. Iexplore.exe is simply the file name for all versions of IE.

This URL is for IE 10, but it should work.

http://community.spiceworks.com/how...ble-the-internet-explorer-10-app-in-windows-8
[Windows 8 General] GoodDayToDie:
I would recommend unchecking it in the Windows Features dialog, hitting OK, then going back and adding it again... but yeah, you somehow deleted the shortcuts from the Start menu.

By the way, it's entirely possible to remove iexplore.exe (the browser); what you can't remove without breaking things is mshtml.dll (the rendering engine).
[Windows 8 General] Shivammcool:
But when unchecking it in the Windows Features it says that it could mess with some other part of Windows. What would happen?
[Windows 8 General] SixSixSevenSeven:
I used to disable it, nothing ever happened.
[Windows 8 General] GoodDayToDie:
Re-enabling it will fix any changes anyhow.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HuaweiHelp:
Please, can someone help me with huawei y200?

I think, i'm bricked my software, on this phone :)

I can't go into CWM. when i'm trying to turn on the device, only huawei logo appears. And nothing happens.

I think, i'm bricked while trying to install cwm correctly, now i can't even reinstall software pushing volume up, down and power off/on.

I think that, i can go into fastboot mode.

Thank you for your support.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HuaweiHelp:
Help please.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] AGx-07_162:
I've had nothing but terrible LTE reception in my area, despite T-Mobile's coverage map showing I'm in the area. So I decided to do a little test.

I woke up late at night and ran Speed Test on my phone to check my speed. I found that I got the best download speeds late at night when I had my S3, likely due to less traffic. Here are my results:

LTE: 3.80 Mbps Down, 1.31 Mbps Up

HSPA+: 12.69 Mbps Down, 1.7 Mbps Up

Crazy isn't it? Good thing I'm on Wifi almost everywhere I go otherwise that would drive me nuts. Results are even worse during the day.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] AdmiralCF420:
I get pretty amazing LTE service in most parts of KC i usually get between 25-30Mbps down and about 15Mbps up or so. When I'm at home though my service is lousy with about 5Mbps down and 1Mbps up so for me it just depends where I'm at.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] XxLostSoulxX:
Before the Coverage map used to say because lte is still fairly new it's not a very good exactment on the coverage side or something on those lines. Anyway just because it says excellent or very strong doesn't mean LTE it just means it's a great coverage whether it be H or H+ or LTE. But it doesn't specify if that exact location is LTE. At my address it says excellent but it is only with H+ however.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] flipq88:
So why don't you set it to only wcdma/gsm?

That's what I did cuz lte where I'm at is ridiculously slow.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] dragonstalker:
Here in Augusta, i'm rarely on LTE, Usually if a get a good signal it's only 4G (HSPA+)

Even when i was on the (V word) network. My network in this area, with a tower 2 miles away i only got 15mbps dn and 5mbps up
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] KillaHurtz:
HSPA+ is 12mps maybe on a good day.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] CalcProgrammer1:
I'm getting pretty crappy LTE signal too indoors, works fine outside but it worked in my office on my Note 1 as well as outside.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] teknowiz23:
same thing here in MN. coverage area says "excellent" but lte is horribly inconsistent and unusable for anything that involves downloading. this applies whether i'm indoors or out, rural or high-density urban area. HSPA+ gives me a consistent 2meg download speed on the play store, and that applies to browser downloads as well, so until they get their QoS issues resolved, i willl likely keep it to WCDMA/GSM.
[Nook Touch General] sany:
First things first, I have just got hold of a NST from eBay and this is my first e-reader. I wanted to know before I proceed further, is this the forum concerning Simple Touch as well because it only says Nook Touch, so any solutions discussed here will they apply to my Simple Touch?

To my main question: Sorry it this was asked before. After rooting will I be able to zoom pdfs , the files that are image based like magazines for example.

If I want to roll back to original firmware after rooting - is there a possibility?

Will I be able adjust the contrast setting of the display because it looked washed out for me (maybe it is only me having used tablets all these years.)

Please point me to a step by step guide to root and the best custom firmware.

Thanks in advance

S
[Nook Touch General] sany:
No one here for simple touch?
[Nook Touch General] straygecko:
Yes, these are the forums for the Nook Simple Touch and Nook Simple Touch with Glow Light. Read the development thread on NookManager and the apps forum on pdf reader applications for more on your questions. The short answers is yes you can do everything you want. The caveat is you will need to read instructions carefully and there are quirks to everything. So read first and see if you're comfortable with the rooting process and the apps you will have available.
[Nook Touch General] sany:
Thanks many
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zcat84:
So yesterday I decided to root my HTC one, after the 4.3 update.

After I unlocked the bootloader, I couldn't root using TWRP because the touchscreen wouldn't work when I booted to recovery. I figured out that I was using an old version TWRP, and once I updated TWRP it seemed like everything was going to work. Now I have SuperSU (updated to the newest version via app store) on my phone but when I try to open the app I get the following error

"There is no SU binary installed, and Super SU cannot install it. This is a problem!

If you just upgraded to Android 4.3, you need to manually re-root - consult the relevant forums for your device"

Uhhhh any ideas on how to fix this? This is the first time I have tried to root so I don't have alot of experience with this. I can't post in the Dev page because I previously had been a lurker and never really posted.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Amos_Mymon:
same problem

Same problem here.

I have T-Mobile HTC one that I convert to Google play edition.

After the update to 4.3 I lost the root.

Please help.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] akuma24:
Can you do it via recovery?
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zcat84:
I'm not sure what you mean. I can boot into recovery and get into twrp, and now that I have the new version of TWRP it the screen will work. I'm not sure if that answers your questions or not.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] francorg:
I use universal just as a pda and not as a phone because it's too big, but in the car it would be so handy if it could be used as a bluetooth handsfree, specially with the Brondi car mounting.

Thank you,

Roberto
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] dialanothernumb:
works for me with the JasJar (latest o2 rom), Sony Eric HBH car kit and voice dialling
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] francorg:
Maybe I didn't explain well...

As a phone I use a nokia6630 and I use Universal just as PDA (not phone)

Is there a way to use Universal as a bt handsfree for my nokia6630?
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ODAWGY:
SwiftRom​

Hi just writing this because im making a Aosp rom for google nexus 4 (mako).

I was just wondering what should i put into it like widgets and apps.

This is my first rom and the only thing is i don't have a nexus 4.

I'm motivated to do this project because i want to be a java programmer.

I'm 15, 16 in march. The rom will be called SwiftRom,

Please leave a comment if the app/widget is opensource it could be implimented.

:laugh:

OPENSOURCE FTW
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Harry GT-S5830:
Well first thing to consider is 4.4 is supposed to be arriving soon; I'd wait a few days to get the source.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ODAWGY:
True but i've got source ill be making a 4.4 rom as well
[Galaxy Note 3 General] onyxogen:
"KNOX WARRANTY VOID" - only unfortunate wording? Please share your thoughts.

The flag everybody talks about is called "KNOX WARRANTY VOID". Considering that this text has been come up with by some non-native english speaking Korean it occured to me that this means actually something really different from what most people tend to understand. (I'm non-native English speaking too as you can see by reading this weird sentence, but I hope you get it nevertheless :) )

What most think of when they read "KNOX WARRANTY VOID":

"Device warranty void"

What I think of when I read "KNOX WARRANTY VOID":

"Knox warranty void".

Do you see the difference? I think that Samsung has to give some kind of warranty that the feature Knox works as it should (that means separating private data from enterprise data) in order to make companies use this feature. That's because they rely on it. Normally the flag is toggled by manipulating the device in a way that no one can assure that Knox works anymore as intended. A non-Samsung process running as root may cross process boundaries and give access to data it should not. So if a big company faces this situation they say: Hey Samsung, you assured that the device is secure but now look at this! The company could also make a claim for compensation!!!

But then Samsung can take a look at the device and say: "No way. The Knox warranty is void on this device. It is not secure anymore. It's written here."

That's it I think. It's not about denying the regular consumer warranty. It's about denying the warranty that the feature knox works as intended. That's why the flag is called "Knox warranty void". Maybe it's a bit unfortunately worded.

What do you think?
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Breach:
Your thought is just as valid as the other.

I guess someone from Samsung would need to inform us, or someone with a broken cellphone that is 0x1 would need to try to see if they could get it repaired or replaced under warranty.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] cgi:
Considering what Samsung did lately, the (for the customer) worst possible explanation is probably true.

What I read here, the phone is rootable and will boot without ever showing the knox flag. Maybe knox apps will not work anymore, but it stands to reason, that a sufficiently powerful enemy could likely modify the OS in a way to emulate the knox flag. To get around this, some kind of trusted cryptographic store would be needed, that only releases keys if the firmware checks out clean. However, if you have that, then you wouldn't need that efused flag in the first place. (Correct me please, if I am wrong here.)
[Galaxy Note 3 General] alom5:
I think your point may well be valid. I have read somewhere that people with the knox void are still getting their phone fixed by Samsung for free. .. so. ....
[Galaxy Note 3 General] freebeerz:
Yes, I always assumed that it means the "Knox warranty" is void, not specifically the customer warranty. Basically the phone can't be used in a Knox environment anymore. To most end users this will have no impact since Knox is only useful to companies that will pay Samsung for the privilege... It's basically a push from Samsung to try to emulate the former success of Blackberry in large companies. I doubt it'll be very successful, and anyway it's already possible to root a device without triggering Knox, so in effect the warranty means absolutely nothing for the moment... (like most failed DRM schemes!)

I suppose it could be an issue for people who will want to resell the device in the future. Knox voided devices will probably sell a bit cheaper than pristine ones, even though it shouldn't matter to most buyers...
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Bruce lee roy:
Several people have already reported being denied warranty service due to knox flag. OP your understanding of "Knox Warranty Void" is conjecture. Without Samsung releasing a clear statement unequivocally stating their official position there is no use in guessing. Why make their job easier by misguiding users to believe that you are speaking from a privileged position?
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Breach:
The truth is that his conjecture is just as possible as the current conjecture. Why put the word "Knox" in there at all.. "Warranty Void" is all that is needed if the customer's phone warranty was being voided.

"Knox Warranty" sounds like a way for them to decide if they need to warranty data loss or theft. A way for them to determine is a system as been modified allowing someone admin/root access to the 'secured' data.

But then again.. Without Samsung releasing a clear statement unequivocally stating their official position it's just 'guessing'.

It's also very clear, at least to me, that the OP was posing a question and not speaking from a privileged position.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] cgi:
From the beginning, my understanding of it was like this:

Knox is a hardware assisted security architecture. The knox part in the warranty flag is to show that it is hardware assisted too, and so immune to resetting or tampering.

Of course, this is conjecture, too.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Breach:
Samsung Knox - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Knox

It's a mobile security and cloud identity technology. Knox is now described as an anti tampering technology. I makes sense that they would attempt to have a way to find out if the system was tampered with.

Time will tell..
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Bruce lee roy:
Although I don't think you realize it, you've just proved my point with your double talk.

... More conjecture

Ending a post with a question mark does not automatically indicate the op's intention is to pose a question. The majority of the op is written as a statement: first starting off by stating an opinion that his/her control of the Korean language (privileged position) gives them a distinct advantage to interpret the legal jargon released by Samsung. This claim by itself is ridiculous. What does the Korean language have to do with the wording of a warranty for English speaking populations? Do you really think the multi billion dollar international conglomerate, known as Samsung, is incapable of producing a decent translation on the TITLE of their legally binding warranty? Seriously people...
[Galaxy Note 3 General] RavenY2K3:
I emailed Samsung about whether the warranty is void or not if it's triggered, twice (as I asked for clarification) and on both occasions they informed me that if any of those counters are anything other than 0x0, you will lose all rights to a warranty repair. Whether it's something like the home button falling off, they will screw you over.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] cgi:
You actually got a straight answer out of them? In plain and legible English? I can hardly believe it... :eek:
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Breach:
I think you are taking this whole subject wayyyy to personally. Relax bro.

It's ALL conjecture at this point, until proven otherwise. In the end, who really cares? Sure, if we can do it without voiding our warranty, that's great. If we can't.. we will void our warranties happily anyways. That is the true way of modders.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Bruce lee roy:
At some point you have to walk away and hope the horse at least has the common sense not to wonder off the edge of a cliff.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] cheesekeeper:
Which really brings us back to the legality of the situation. In many countries (including most of Europe and Australia) the statutory warranty put in place by legislation cannot be denied. The statutory warranty doesn't recognise something like rooting or custom ROMs as a valid reason do deny service, unless the device failure was caused by that action. So from a legal standpoint they cannot deny warranty service based on this, regardless of what they say or put in their own warranty agreement. They really aren't allowed to pick arbitrary reasons to deny service.

On the other hand - try and get it. If Samsung refuse to repair your device under warranty, you would probably have to take them to court to compel them to repair it, and I just don't see anyone trying that. Interestingly enough, whether it would be a valid clause or not, I can't see anything in Samsung's warranty agreement that says modifying the device voids the warranty. Only the standard out that damage *caused by* tampering with the device isn't covered........