yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
I see SIII mini users reporting that CM11 works smooth for them, so I hope it will also be smooth for us. Btw. seeing some screenshots from GNexus, RAM comsumption seems to be a lot less than on, for an example, 4.3. I just wish OC was possible on our phone, but I guess our SoC just isn't good for that :D
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] dagger:
Guys it's my heartily request to all the members here to not to spam the development thread and ask the ROM related queries only in the discussion thread in the general section..

Regards.

[MENTION=4518416]QuantumFoam[/MENTION] can you clean up this thread a bit bro..:)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] frapeti:
http://d-h.st/lED << nightly

Be careful because you can't flash /restore older nightlies without flashing stock by Odin, else you can do it reformatting /preload partition (/dev/block/mmcblk0p9) as ext4 filesystem
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] dsvictor:
Thanks devs for your hard work. :thumbup:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Paul L.:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/kitkat-conquers-novathor-early-cm11-for-the-galaxy-siii-mini/

I'm done, I quit development of anything that can be called software for smarthphones..
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] willi9070:
why they cant work for our device too, thats too self centeric from their side,
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Paul L.:
1) We tried to share about everything we done for janice for evey other device.

2) We also gave support for everyone who wanted to compile from the github.

3) Even when FreeXperia said that "CM 10.1 will not run good on this phone -Xperia U and P-", I continued helping and the other devs (DevSwift and percy_g2) actually pushed out the CM 10.1 beyond expectations. I just don't get the "Android "blah" will not run well on "X" phone, I don't care about that, the point of porting is not to get what it's "supported" by a phone, is actually get the software to support the phone, not the other way around.

4) Even if maclaw and team released CM11, you just should hear what [MENTION=4495609]OliverG96[/MENTION] did, he actually started the developing, he actually shared the code, he was the one pionering on this, without him (and ofcourse, diego, frapeti, fedevp, cocafe, and others) we could not even started anything.

5) And I'm not saying that maclaw didn't do anything on his own, but we shared the code, we tried to be kind to people who actually looked at the developing scene. Even if he developed anything, the point of this is that he is not sharing any code, that's the point, being closed as Samsung do, doesn't make you Samsung, that's why I complain. I just tried that the development for this fu***** phone with almost no sources became open, shared, that every developer doesn't need to implement everything from the start if he ever tried to developed for Novathor chipsets.

6) And even after that, even if we developed cross device wise, to Xperias, to Samsungs, to other languages forums (HTC Mania is a example), even if we did what others said that it wasn't worth while, we did anyway, but we didn't get any recognition, you see me as a recognized developer? you see diego as a recognized developer? do you see us on the xda portal? No!, you see instead, a project which is not open, who others can't start developing on, and that's it.

A while ago, a problem similar to this started between maclaw and TheWhisp and androidarmv6. maclaw ended banned, androidarmv6 continued to do the impossible, porting CM from 9 to 10.1, AOKP to every single phone that has a ARM v6 chipset, like the Galaxy mini, a stupid tiny phone with 256MB of RAM, a 600 MHz Qualcomm single-core processor and it still lives and lives greatly, I'm seeing ports of CM 11 and CM 10.1 lately. androidarmv6 is the whole point of this, I tried to start common development on this chipset, and I couldn't.

And I just don't care anymore, I just quit, that's it.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] percy_g2:
True ..... Even cm-10.2 is stable on xperia novathor devices because of fxp,team canjica and munjeni .We push everything on github for others to get help .Because of you we got a head start on cm-10.1 .

Devswift1,diego and i applied for RD.We all got rejected because we contributed together and worked hard on github .Cared less about making post counts and thanks .

If we make our github private , i don't know what will happen to maclaw's thread .But we are late now . Nothing can be undone now .

Hope novathor gets support in future from Team canjica .

Thanks for helping in xperia novathor development .
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] cottondanielnz:
Latest nightly good so far
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Razvan:
Guys, how can we help you? Just tell us.

Please don't leave your projects for this.

All respects

Powered by CM10.1
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] psiva2010:
Some one please mirror the latest nighty to goo-im

I can't able to download other then tat.

Please help me.

Sorry for bad English
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] drakes992:
Guys this is not very good pleas don't leave :(
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
Newest nightly has haptic feedback, didn't notice that in previous builds. I do not use it but it's still nice to have for those who use it.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] AltamashAN:
Well seems like our phone is going to drown. The developers did their best, but if they would really quit,it'll be the end.

And if any developer want any kind of help we all will try to help you in any case . Just keep the good work.

(At least we can help them by increasing their thanks count. :) .SO IF ANY READER GET ACROSS THE DEVELOPERS ANY POST, PRESS THE THANX BUTTON ATLEAST, TJEY DESERVE IT.)

Sorry for bad English.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] anddy777:
last build link ?

are in gom ? :confused:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Razvan:
No its not in goo.im server.

See previous page, frapeti's post.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] willi9070:
Guys dont panic, deves wont leave and as far as sharing developments goes i believe community and collaboration are two most important pillars for this forum or any open source project in general, there should be rule on xda that devs from different devices running on similar chipsets must help each other and collaborate for bringing similar developments and progress for same chipset devices whenever practically possible, they should not keep anything private after all community is one and android is open source :)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] xfire:
Can you explain exactly what to do? Thank you very much.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] willi9070:
just flash it clear cache/ dalvik cache, he said you wont be able to restore earlier builds backup , you need to flash stock first via odin......
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
Woah, you guys really got upset. I don't think devs will stop working on our phone just because maclaw did not release his sources. And btw. his ROMs are not fully working and bug-free, just take a look at the CM10.2 topic in SIII mini forum.

OT: The nightly works great.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Douglas Gomes:
How to install this update? What are the changes? Thank you.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] hyuratzu:
The problem is that Maclaw being an a**hole became an RD and our devs, even if they always shared everything and cooperate with other devices' forum, are still "normal" users.

Being an RD is important, you have access to other parts of XDA created especially for devs, like build servers if I'm right (not so sure about that thou).

Anyway, it's frustrating and I can understand why Paul would quit.

It's like if you and your team make an important discovery, you're about to win the nobel prize but then another random guy read your paper, change a formula and win YOUR nobel prize instead of you and your team. That's ridicolous.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] willi9070:
download, flash via recovery , clean cache/dalvik cache after, before flash, done
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Douglas Gomes:
What changes?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Paul L.:
I exaggerated about quitting, I'm just keeping quiet for now. And maclaw is not a RD, but with this news is probably going to.

And nobody else is quitting, but is this way of being recognized is atleast, wrong. We work as a team and this releases were just because everyone did a little or a big something for this to work. But XDA rewards the RDs for individual works, not for team works, in that way we are mostly not candidates for the tittle. I have only one ROM "active" (from my ownership, in where I am the original thread creator), but when I filled out for the RD I was working atleast on 4, PAC directly and CM for janice/Xperia U/Xperia P indirectly. Obviously the only that counts is PAC. And diego deserves the RD because he kick started directly the development of this device, custom ROMs without diegos original work wouldn't have existed. And with his development he is indirectly responsible of the other devices and developers I worked with. DevSwift and percy also deserve RD, without them we could not have started the cross-device development, the Xperias got CM 10.1 because of them. Without them they could be still stuck on CM 10, and maybe stucked forever.

Sent from I9070/LiquidSmooth via XDA Premium v4
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
I remember following his topic in GMini development, and then he got banned. I could not remember the reason. Thanks for the explanation. [MENTION=4351285]Paul L.[/MENTION]

He might not be an RD, but his ''work'' still got mentioned on the portal even tho his sources are closed. His team is like MIUI team except they work on alot on devices and they make their OWN ROMs so i can understand MIUI being closed source but how can he take an open source ROM and make it closed source for himself? Anyway our device never got mentioned on the portal, in fact, none of the team canjica's work haven't which is idiotic since you did a lot of work and TC develops for 5 devices. Well maybe our device will be featured on the portal when we get CM11, but it won't have such a ''impresive'' headline, since Mr. Closed sources already ''conquered'' nova thor.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] assassin0408:
Sory for off topic?just curious paul.are you using liquid smooth now??
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] willi9070:
downloading now, will report shortly...
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Douglas Gomes:
Thank you
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Paul L.:
I said some while ago that even if I want to continue on PAC, I wanted to work on more simpler proyects, ParanoidAndroid was one of them, but that is already covered by Shaaan, and before starting with PAC, I tried to compile PA, which was, somewhat broken on that time (it screwed up partitions, and you had to reflash with ODIN).

And also considered to do either AOSP Android or some of the newer proyects like LiquidSmooth, CarbonRom (you did cover that lol) or even AOKP (other one covered by you! Again heh).

Since AOSP needs to superduper java skills and adaptation for this device (Do you ever wondered why CyanogenMod is prefered and the easiest ROM to compile for every single not nexus device? CM has most of the patches for a AOSP port integrated, and most people is already in touch with its features and stays very close to a pure Android experience, no reason for AOSP.)

So, even if I did some progress on AOSP (because I had experience on compiling it for Galaxy mini -thanks to MMB team that they did the dirty stuff lol-), it was a pain in the butt, so I decided to give LiquidSmooth a try. Is...nice? And it works very fluidly, but there is a little problem with the optimizations LS Team did to the compiling process. So, I have a LiquidSmooth ROM, I'm not using it through, I am on CM 10.2, Titanium Backup messed up this lol. (And I did not notice it until now lololol)

Sent from I9070/LiquidSmooth via XDA Premium v4
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
Too bad AOKP still has old CM10.1 bugs, [MENTION=5098817]assassin0408[/MENTION] will you continue your work on it? Its a really great ROM.

And [MENTION=4351285]Paul L.[/MENTION] PA is not really in the best state atm, and neither is PAC(4.3).
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] psiva2010:
I'm waiting for goo-im link :(
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Abhinandh Ajay:
Damn Maclaw that ass****. You guys should really be getting the credit you deserve. And the whole system of giving RD status is really screwed up. XDA should really change that and stop giving credit to closed source (and previously banned) ass***** :mad::banghead:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Paul L.:
Well, lately Google has pushed out 2 Android updates in a shorter period than usual and every custom ROM had to kept up to date with them.

About PAC, I prefer to stay on Android 4.2. About PA, even if PA was broken, I feel it with a very different approach from CM, they implemented incredible and revolutionary features with little help from other custom ROMs, and they actually kanged little patches from CM, that others do, like AOKP and PAC themselves. LiquidSmooth also uses this approach, but instead on focusing on features they focus on super optimizing the Android framework for speed and smoothness, libraries, kernel, and pretty much everything, while retaining the pure Android experience and even more.

AOKP is great, but I think that assassin can cover it fairly easily, so I pretty much didn't even touch/see the code.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
Thanks for the info Paul :)

Anyway guys, somewhere in this thread or CM10.1 thread i saw somebody say that 4.3 libs are compatible with 4.4, but looking at CM11 development on other devices, i doubt they are.

And now, im not sure if this is on topic or not, im wondering why are games running better on 2.3.6 than on 4.1,4.2 and 4.3? Should CM be faster than stock, even if it is GB?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] ManiacShri:
Listen guys, let's try and do something for the team this time.. If I'm not wrong, the portal is handled by someone whom you can write to, so why doesn't someone write to them, explain what really is going on (the entire maclaw and his kangs story) and get some well deserved recognition for team canjica? I don't know whom to contact but if someone does why don't they take the initiative... I don't think it's a bad bet
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
Its possible only with solid evidence, so if somebody has it then something can be done about that.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] t4n017:
I was going to say the same. We are a lot of users and we know you work hard to contribute as much as possible. There should be something we can do.

English isn't my first language so I'm not the indicated to take the initiative, but of course I'll follow it!
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] assassin0408:
May i declare something guys?ok now i am in university with a very hectic schedule and also a very bad internet connection..so paul, can i just let you continue with aokp (4.3 maybe?)..and i will state in the op that my aokp project will not be continued. Sorry guys.. Now i am back to normal user.. Like paul said aosp for our device need a very skillful person with coding. I am not that skillful and i dont have time to learn coding stuffs. Being very busy with my biotech course..
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] hyuratzu:
It's a great idea to propose Team Canjica (all of them) for RDs, but I think we should just ignore all the maclaw's story.

After all it's none of our business, he kanged and he knows it, if he can live with it, well, lucky him. Even if we propose solid evidence (and I doubt there are as today) that he kanged that'd reveal to be just useless.

But, again, proposing Team Canjica for RDs is a great idea! We could write a single email to someone on XDA (@Paul L. if you know who we can write to that'd be very appreciated :) ) with all ours nickname and email addresses, a sort of petition.

In that email we'd link every Team Canjica work (for our device and the contribution on other devices, too), I doubt they could refuse to give them RDs with everything under their eyes.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] assassin0408:
Yupp..very much agreed with you. Let's find someone in xda portal n tell everything about maclaw.and also give RD to paul, diego, and all team canjica's member..they really deserved the RD title..
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] GæxD:
New nightly?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] vlk67:
http://d-h.st/lED
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] GæxD:
Report?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] geopapa:
Seems like new nightly has CWM-Touch. So be careful with your swipes while on recovery :D

Everything near perfect so far except low incoming call volume issue not solved yet.:crying:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] vlk67:
I haven't found it :(
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] GæxD:
Still have random reboots?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] lollerblade:
Just flashed the rom, works flawlessly by now. Had to do a bit of work for syncing contacts and other stuff, but no problem then, everything works (apart for the known bugs), no force-closes nor crashes.

Keep up this good work, devs! Never tried a CM before this, I'm amazed now!
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] AltamashAN:
Now here is the problem I've faced till now which draining my battery crazily.I noticed battery was draining fastly then I looked for battery option even turning off WiFi, it was on all the time.

Is there any way to quickly turn WiFi off?

EDIT: found the answer, had to disable some options in advanced setting of WiFi .

Sorry for bad English.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] thirdzcee:
This one caught my attention even though its really not that big of a deal... actually it made me and my friend laugh when I told him I got android 4.3 and when I showed him the version he tapped on it to reveal the platform logo and to our surprise the image was the ICS logo...

View attachment 2349908

Over all ROM seems better than cm10.1 based on a day of use... Still too early to tell though but so far no lock ups and soft reboots yet just the annoying changing of music when I get a notification coupled with fc of DSP manager
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] hastalafiesta:
Just amazing. I have done this log during using adfree (doesnt't work and don't know why...) here a log...may help with something..

this is the first release and all is working (my baseband is XXLQI) also compass is working;)

EDIT I have just noticed that my battery statistics, particulary on screen is like frozen...it shows 20 mins since I have put the phone on...about an hour ago.. [MENTION=2836423]diego-ch[/MENTION]
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] regisknechtel:
Same here. 18% consumed in 1 hour of stand by.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Razvan:
Weird. I have only 13% baterry usage after 3.5 hours with wifi on, Tapatalk and few voice calls.

See the screeshots bellow...

Powered by CM10.1
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] lollerblade:
I remember to have read on CM 10.1 thread that it was possible to set the deep sleep state value (e.g. 3, 4, 5), is this possible on this rom as well? If yes, how?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Razvan:
No. We don't have anymore Advanced Settings. Let's see what devs release later.

Powered by CM10.1
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] hastalafiesta:
here you this script. It will set some settings like the deepest deep sleep level at 4 and other things. Hope I help you

HOW-TO put the script in system/etc/init.d and set to the file this perm 777 (rwx-rwx-rwx)

EDIT i changed the file and now it will work at 100%
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] AltamashAN:
Go to advanced setting of WiFi and set option "keep WiFi on during sleep" and "scanning always available" off

Sorry for bad English.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] t4n017:
Nice work devs!, you're really awesome.

I've been testing some hours and it's working so good. I feel it smoother than 10.1

Is new 'Users' feature working? When I want to add a new user my phone restart. I attached a logcat (it's my first one, I hope it's well done)
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] :
A tip : Extract "GalaxySAdvanceSettings.apk" (or maybe GalaxyS2Settings.apk or something like that.) from CM 10.1.Then place on your /system/app and set perms to rw-r-r tap to reboot.

It's the Advanced Settings' APK on CM 10.1 it's placed on /system/app.Even Shaaan's builds was including that.Maybe it will back
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] jazzh:
Hi!

I would like to try just to confirm something before that...

I'm on stock 4.1.2 xxlqe cocore 8.0 twrp. I see 555 mb of ram instead of 625 or 629. I wroze about it here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2421943

Amount of ram - running apps ?

Now should I try something first before cm10.2 in order to recover all of the ram?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] frapeti:
it wont work, cm team removed it from settings package, they added it back today, so next build will have it enabled
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] Sh0m1:
Real Racing 3 runs lot worse than on cm10.1 . It has stuttering and freezes. Is it related to mali settings?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
My battery stats:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] hastalafiesta:
Mali settings are same as cm 10.1..but the debug level is set to 2 instead 0 that I think is better..try to change it to 0
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] shut_down:
How did you get that? :)

I got normal. :cyclops:
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] hastalafiesta:
Youtube is pixelated like in cm 10.1...is it a kernel related problem or is caused by the app?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] zamurai x:
which is the state SELinux?
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] arg1001:
The new nightly has random reboots? or now it's solved?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9070 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] GæxD:
If it is fixed the random reboots the rom will be perfect.
[Galaxy S Advance I9070 Original Android Developmen] vlk67:
in previous nightly versions was possible use fixes for low incoming call from cm10.1