yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] Archaenon:
I'm hoping photoshop will get on board and make an app, or at the very least pro-create. I use it a lot for work, it was just random doodling on my previous notes, but the 3 has a lot of potential.

Not bad, I like how clean you can get line work on this with the added resolution.

Thanks!

I don't think you can, you might have to do a bit of exporting and then importing them back in to get a png/gif effect. Sounds like a neat project, good luck.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] Archaenon:
I looked at Pen.UP, but I haven't made an account. I mainly just use instagram to post.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] bloodyRevolver:
Drawing on the phone was a huge draw for me. Anyone else notice that it works with slate PC Wacom Digitizers?? No root required. some apps even support the eraser. The samsung eraser pen still works the best, but I thought it was neat. Artflow studio says it's not compatible with my device. So I guess I'm stuck with sketchbook. I agree that it needs selection tools badly.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] dv8nathan:
I use my fujitsu digitizer sometimes because of the eraser. Just soften the hard eraser and it works great.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] timmyhawk1983:
I made an account just end up erasing what i started most of the time .. i tend to be picky
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] IronMan1289:
This phone is awesome!!! Some scribbles on the way home from work.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] a3plew:
Just scribbling last night
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] theorioles33:
I should have posted this earlier but the Amazon App Stores free app of the day is SketchBook Mobile!
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] Ryo Misaki:
I must say... I sure didn't get the Note FOR drawing...

(I got it for the speed and screen space. And that my Infuse was horridly outdated.)

But after playing with it, drawing on it is amazing.

The pen works like a dream, and it's nice that you can choose to have it reject touch.

And that fine tip accuracy is something I've desired in a mobile device for ages!
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] bloodyRevolver:
Ah Ha! The Amazon store has artflow studio. I still have to unlock the full features, however the interface seems nice.
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] dv8nathan:
I couldnt install on note three. Playstore says incompadible. Is there another way or am i missing something. Thankyou
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] ukic:
Damn, once again you guys rock on drawing! Keep up the good work :)
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] TeRrOkToR:
cool :good:
[AT&T Galaxy Note 3 General] Namuna:
I originally backed this project when it was on Kickstarter, knowing I was going to be getting the Note3 when it came out. The Brush actually works great on the Note3 (no pressure sensitivity though).

Sensu Capacitive Artist Brush
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] skedone:
hi guys i was a idiot i flashes the wrong theme file for arhd 3.0 and messed up my phone. The problem is i have also being extra clever delteted the rom file from my device and now i cant get the rom back on to fix this problem

i am s-on and rooted and htc dev unlocked

i have tried otg mount in twrp and it fails i have tried adb side load but it never finds my device

please someone help me

i am running windows 7 64
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] 954wrecker:
Wrong forum

Sent from my HTC One XL
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] skedone:
yeah sorry for some reason forum swithed to this area and i missed that before i posted lol mods please close
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dr.Weed1:
Is it possible to fix this problem?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mithrandir_:
1:this is not the right section

2:are you using twrp? The backup was done with cwm?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dr.Weed1:
I did backup with cwm
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mithrandir_:
And now you have cwm or twrp?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dr.Weed1:
cwm
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Calin:
Thread reported, next time try to ask those questions in the right place not in the development section

Sent from my GT-I9001
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dr.Weed1:
Where is the right place?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mithrandir_:
Problably the backup gas failed
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xsenman:
yes its possible, when

1) you use the same CWM version that made that backup you wish to use

or

2) you open your CWM Backup with root explorer , locate file named "nandorid.md5" and open it and delete all its contents, than save that empty file and try doing the restore again.

BTW when you want to ask a question or seek help, don't you think its important to let others know what phone , model and ROM you have? You don't expect everyone to know that do you? cause without it, you might get a wrong answer and whole lot of new problems .

Check this out! You , YES! you are an " Android ". Not your phone but U.

You Must watch this documentary concerning your privacy Terms & Conditions we had agreed to, by using a PC or Smartphone

How to say Thank you? If you find any post helpful on XDA, click on their Thanks button

If you are using XDA App or Tapatalk, long press on the post and select :good: Thanks

Its easier to give "Feedback" in this manner than make an additional post.​
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vieose:
Well means that simply that I can forget oc or uv my device as like using cm in my device?

And the way flashing a kernel via fastboot won't work for us?
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Deleted member 4529355:
Forget about unlocking the bootloader, its not possible. No over/under-clock for you, no CyanogenMod or other goodies.

All carrier branded phones are locked and almost impossible to unlock.
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vieose:
No love for me
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vieose:
Cruel world
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cbarai:
BTW.. Why cannot her over/under-clock the phone?

I have over/under clock with a locked BL. Ofcourse there is only somuch that you can and cant do. but still..
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CallMeVentus:
Only thing I can recommend is to get a generic device instead of a carrier one.

No use lamenting about it here.

This message was sent so that I'm slightly more useful
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vieose:
How should overclock work, stock kernels are not able to be setted higher.

Under-clock is possible yes.
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sunbird668:
i think so

i cant find any toos to unlock it,if u succeed,share with us pls
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZakooZ:
Some people say that rooting solves the problem (XZ only?), some say unlocking the sim works
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vieose:
Rooting changes nothing, sadly

Gesendet von meinem C5303 mit Tapatalk
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mmm273:
is there chance to have -Bootloader Unlock Allowed: No - when my phone is from shop ? ( not from carrier, not branded)
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Riodrian:
I think that it's not the matter of branded/not branded etc. beacuse I've seen bootloader unlock allowed: yes after I rooted and installed CWM and TWRP; today I've reverted rooting via SPC and the bootloader unlock allowed is back on: no; so I think someone has to look through it to see if you can override it...
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ZakooZ:
I rooted and installed cwm/twrp but it's still saying No

Next i'll install generic C5303 firmware, as I am running on branded firmware! Have to do it tomorrow though because It's pretty late now
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] uberlaggydarwin:
Nope :(

I doubt the Sony bootloader will be cracked any time soon as the Xperia T was never cracked and thats a much older device.

Unfortunately that means no custom kernels/CyanogenMod.

If you buy a factory unlocked device the bootloader will be unlockable/carrier branded devices may be locked and not unlock able.. Pretty simple really.

Sorry that I can't help much. :(
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] raziel123:
Un-lock Xpeia SP

If you Un-lock the Xperia SP for all Networks, does this make bootloader Unlock available? :confused:

If not, any Ideas why?
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] uberlaggydarwin:
Been answered many times before.

Nope. SIM-UNLOCK is separate to bootloader unlock.

It just doesn't.
[Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zolaisugly:
On some old xperia phones you could open sim and bootloader like xperia arc if you used test point method to unlock sim it unlocked boot loader as well.

2013 xperia models that don't have removable battery are no longer able to use test point so you can't unlock boot loader or sim.

To unlock sim you need code which you cab buy from internet.

To unlock bootloader you need to contact your airtime provider and see if they will help in unlocking bootloader again this needs code but not freely available.
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] detdroid:
Has any1 found a possibility to enable landscape mode for homescreen?

Thx in advance

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7100 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy Ace S5830i Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rockonhell:
Guys r u facing xda app force close error???

N every thread first 2 lines r blank.

Really annoying me!!!!
[Galaxy Ace S5830i Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] -SyncSoft-:
Yeh that was happening with me... but it is the apps fault. I don't think we can do anything about it. But it didn't bother me at all... You can also use Tapatalk; it is much faster and it has the same UI.

Hit ThanX if I helped, it won't hurt, maybe...
[Galaxy Ace S5830i Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mathm2013:
If you had used Q&A section XDA wouldn't bug. Now serious, i'm facing this problem too. Use tapatalk.
[Acer Iconia A500] antonismarios:
i can't enter in recovery mode at all.

Either i see an android with red triangle or i see the message recovery verified failed

i have ACER_AV041_A500_1.031.00WW_GEN1

ICS 4.0.3

KERNEL V.2.6.39.4+

IMAGE VERSION ACER_AV041_A500_RV03RC01_WW_GEN1
[Acer Iconia A500] Moscow Desire:
Were you running a custom CWM recovery before? Just curious.

Try this thread....

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2482766

See if it'll install one of those packages.

MD
[Android General] silyboy:
I just flashed the MIUI 3.10.18 Rom on my galaxy s2 GT-I9100

everything is working fine

but i have 2 major bugs

1) first when anyone calls me the phone autoreject the call without giving any notificatin or sound with numbers in the contacts or not

ps. i can make phone calls though but it rejects the incoming ones

2) the notifications for facebook or whatsapp or any other app dont show in the notification bar there is a notification sound but the icon doesnt appear in the bar

please help me i love this rom i dont wanna change it

Comment
[Android General] edjahman:
Miui Problem please help!

So i flashed MIUI also on my S3 I535 and I am having the same problem.

When my wife calls, the screen will light up and it sends her to voicemail. I don't get any notification at all and when i look at the call log it says rejected.

I've been searching on google for a long time trying to find an answer to no avail.

I love this ROM but this sucks really bad.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 General] Avalon-99:
I had Pocketbreeze and PocketZenPhone on my MDA II and it worked fine.

Now I have Pocketbreeze 5.0 on my MDA Pro with WM2005.

If I create a new Appointment in Pocketbreeze on my Todayscreen, it takes 2 seconds.

With installed PocketZenPhone WM 2005 it takes 10 - 15 seconds to create a new appointment.
[About XDA developers] wideasleep1:
Hello! I researched the Rules and did not find a clear policy on members posting .apk's on the forum, especially relating to non-market apps. I understand some members (NOT recognised as devs/themers,etc) may want to test their apps and call out a request and I see that from time to time, but I also worry that malicious code could be propagated in this manner, when there is no 'market'-like processes to vet said apps. Latest example is a post with a wallpapers app/.apk that the poster says must be pushed via adb. Could I get a clarification of the policy? TIA! Cheers!
[About XDA developers] Product F(RED):
It's basically "you're on your own." Why? If you're not comfortable with sideloading third-party applications, you shouldn't be on XDA in the first place. I don't mean this in an offensive way.
[About XDA developers] wideasleep1:
Nothing to do with 'sideloading', happy to do so on apk's from known/trusted sources (esp. known dev/themers with history). So I can post any malicious code, wrap it in an .apk and post it here and things are hunky-dory?
[About XDA developers] Product F(RED):
Sideloading = Taking an APK file and manually installing it on your device, which is what you're describing.

CAN you do that? Yes. SHOULD you do that? No.

If you get caught, will you get banned? Yes.

Do we have some sort of attachment scanner capable of scanning APKs? No.

Even if we did, would spreading malicious APKs still be possible? Yes, through external hosting sites.
[About XDA developers] orangekid:
Just to clarify:

You can post any APK you want to as long as it is NOT someone else's paid app (warez) nor illegal, nor harmful to a device.

If you look at the various themes and apps section, lots of Junior and Senior members post up their APKs or flashable ZIPs or what have you, and this is not against our rules. The rules just forbid you putting up a paid APK that you did not develop, because that is illegal and is basically stealing.

But there is no blanket rule against posting APKs or installing APKs.

you DO need to be careful what you install though. If you see something shady report it. I personally would NOT flash a wallpapers APK, but I would install a verified beta launcher APK or something, so you need to exercise some common sense..
[About XDA developers] wideasleep1:
Again, I understand there are risks and again my point has nothing to do with sideloading per se..my point is your statement:

"If you get caught, will you get banned? Yes. "

And I ask, How? Under what rule? If it is a banworthy offence, there should be a rule.
[About XDA developers] orangekid:
Re-read my post.

You will not be banned for posting or installing an APK unless it is warez or obviously spam or harmful.

"If you get caught, will you get banned? Yes. "

This is statement is not true unless it violates what I have just described.

There are APKs floating all over these forums. I personally use the transparent Genie Wdiget APK that you can only find in APK form, that I actually have to push to /system/app to get to work, there is NO RULE that says you cannot post it or install it.
[About XDA developers] wideasleep1:
Therein lies the problem..what is 'harmful to a device'? Auto-brick? Is harmful to the user (ID/personal info theft) not included in 'harmful'?

(Devil's advocate time)..I care MUCH LESS about paid apk 'theft' than ID/personal info theft..for our members, that issue greatly outweighs some commercial interests. I understand completely XDA currently has no mechanism to police code/.apk's posted, etc. Part of my point in raising the issue is to understand what would raise a flag/ban currently and again under what rule.

This is a given. I just think XDA needs a clear(er) policy on this, and is missing an opportunity to roll this into a Recognised Contributor/Developer/Themer attribute, giving our membership greater confidence when using 'unofficial' apk's/non-market apps. I think management should revisit the topic, and come up with a defined rule like other ban-able offences, and utilise existing tools (Recognised labels or other excellence-based protocol) to enhance member confidence going forward.
[About XDA developers] orangekid:
The normal rules regulate what you can post. We have an anti-warez rule, so that would include an APK.

We cannot just have a million rules on this or that permission is allowed in this APK or not, you just have to use common sense on it.

Honestly, APKs don't really cause bricks. At worst they will soft-brick a device, but the things that cause bricks are bootloader or radio flashes, or a bad kernel, but not APKs, so that's not really something to worry about.

Even some Play Store apps are found to have malware and are removed by Google, but not before infecting a phone, so it is not possible to regulate every single APK, nor is it possible to prevent all hard bricks.

As long as there are users who are not careful or who do not read and Odin flash the wrong firmware or flash an HBOOT version that was expressly told not to flash or flash an old .51 radio on a T-Mobile HD2 you will have problems.

This is a developer forum. Developers make apps and they put it in APK form. There is nothing wrong with this. Be careful what you push to /system/app, look at the permissions you are allowing. Do you want a wallpaper APK to have access to your phone records or GPS location? If not, hit cancel.

But I don't think we should ban all APKs, or APKs that want this or that permission. If you see something shady, report it.

And I don't understand what a recognized Dev, Themer, or Contributor title has to do with posting APKs, those are not related in any way, or did I miss the point on that?

How would you clarify the rules on this? What problem have you seen that needs to be solved? This seems academic unless you've seen a practical issue?
[About XDA developers] Product F(RED):
I don't really get what his (the OP's) point is, but my response was specifically addressing his question about knowingly posting malicious APKs.
[About XDA developers] orangekid:
I didn't get the malicious part. Yeah that would obviously be removed
[About XDA developers] wideasleep1:
I assert XDA lacks a rule for malware or onerous permissions, and it *should* be a 'normal rule', along with warez, etc.

I'm not requesting a million, just a CLEAR rule on XDA's policy on .apk posting, what constitutes a ban or link removal.

Agreed. My point is XDA can clarify the rule, while instilling confidence in the .apk's routinely posted within fora (especially if they come from Recognised Devs/Themers and the like, that is why I mentioned the Recog label, but I assume it was devised to control donation begging, rather than any design to add member confidence, please correct me if I'm wrong).

I'm not concerned with, well, idiots..I simply think XDA could do better with monitoring it's links wrt .apk's and develop a clearer policy, as it has done for warez.

The crux...members are MORE LIKELY to report a shady .apk IF WE HAD A CLEAR POLICY, and enforcement.

Perhaps, but that would depend on what one sees as the purpose of 'Recognised' label...I assume it was to elevate the code quality and comradery of developers, but it could simply grant donation status, I suppose.

A clear simple rule: "Downloading and installing software in any manner on your device is AT YOUR OWN RISK. However, XDA reserves the right to remove any links or software and ban members posting any links or software, at its discretion. Members should report any suspicious links and software to staff for review, and use common sense when choosing which developers and software to use. "

Yes, it seems academic, that is why I'm surprised an explicit rule for members to refer to, doesn't exist.

I think I've exhausted my point, so I'll stop unless anyone has anything else to add. Cheers! :)
[About XDA developers] orangekid:
OK, I think I get you know.

I guess I just feel like that is so obvious that it wouldn't really need to be explicitly stated.

If you knowingly post malware, you will be banned.

But I do see your point, and it makes sense. Would you care to hazard a suggestion on how it would be worded and implemented?
[About XDA developers] wideasleep1:
I think what I posted above; "Downloading and installing software in any manner on your device is AT YOUR OWN RISK. However, XDA reserves the right to remove any links or software and ban members posting any links or software, at its discretion. Members should report any suspicious links and software to staff for review, and use common sense when choosing which developers and software to use. "

is a good starting point, but I would also prefer language specifically about malware and onerous permissions. Presently, it seems to be a free-for-all to post anything (non-warez) at whim (throw it against the wall and see what sticks) based on the rules presently. I can see where staff might not 'be on the same page' in responding to member reports on this topic without the clear rule. Even the warez rule itself could be expanded to include malware and onerous permissions...whatever works best for staff, and clarifies the rule for members. I would expect staff-specific rules about what constitutes onerous permissions (like your example about contacts for a wallpaper app) and would like those in the public rule as well, but detail isn't absolutely necessary (it begins to obscure rather than clarify at some point). When the time comes for members to see/report, and staff to delete/ban, this rule should be the reference. Cheers! :)
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kauria:
Hi all, I am really new this forum so please request mods to approve any mistakes or please shift my post to any suitable thread.

I got myself a Karbonn A12 recently and found that it comes with ICS 4.0.4. I am planning to upgrade it to JB, but no update was found from the manufacturer site. Hence I request everyone, if you come up with any update please ping me inn.

Dear senior members please provide me some link for Custom JB roam for my Karbonn A12.

Thanks all
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pahnin:
I want to upgrade to JB too

If anyone know how to flash Karbonn a12 please post it here. I'm noob to android but I can learn stuff if I have to compile something, I'm good at linux, please help!
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eshan15:
karbonn a12

It has been an year since a12 launched and no one has come up with a root.... a12+ is still new and xda is filled with custom roms on it. whats wrong
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hemantv:
As you're new here, I'll tell you some important things.

One of the important rules of XDA is to first search for your query but it seems you didn't put any effort into searching. And why would you post in Themes section if you want to know about OS update?

Also, devices like Karbonn & Micromax don't have much custom development as they use MediaTek processors. If you want to know more about these things, Google them. Thread reported.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RaviWL:
To all Karbonn a12 users use "Vroot" app on PC to root your device, it works.

But I couldn't able to find any custom recovery or custom ROM for this device anywhere yet..
[Xperia Z General] demon434:
According to multiple sources android 4.3 is coming to our Z. In this article it stated that it will release in the last week from November.

What do you guys think? Will the update get the Honami UI and hopefully some camera improvements?

http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2013/...-3-update-release-possibility/#readsoruce_top
[Xperia Z General] Dreiundachzig:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2489383
[Xperia Z General] davros93:
Hope it will have honami launcher and camera improvements.
[Xperia Z General] chesterr:
I think they should simply skip 4.3 and give us 4.4, I love the new features,

HTC One is getting within 90 days.
[Xperia Z General] chefnoob:
I thibk Sony is busy suing Google's ass to be able to come out with the 4.4 kitkat.
[Xperia Z General] VergiL09:
While we are waiting for 4.3, HTC One users and Galaxy S4 & S3 (Yes, S3) users are now enjoying it
[Xperia Z General] Tommy-Geenexus:
Great..and some people still enjoy their old phone with gingerbread

Gesendet von meinem C6603 mit Tapatalk
[Xperia Z General] pjgowtham:
Nov 25 release date. Source : gsmarena
[Xperia Z General] sigitXperia:
I believe that Sony still wait till 4.3 stable just to make convinve, before they build their own, and launch to the end user.. :o
[Xperia Z General] DoubleYouPee:
Ha..i can see them "wow look at this nothing has changed I'm so enjoyed"