yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrgibss:
Hello everybody

I've checked forum to find a solution for my problem, but whitout succes.

Now I using LENOVO S750 Dual SIM, with standard Android 4.2.1.

SIM1(3G) - just data for the internet, skype, VoIP, etc.

SIM2(2G) - just voice calls and text.

My problem is like that:

When I'm using my phone for internet (skype, YT, data exchange) nobody can call to me on second SIM2 card number (it says out of range or phone switch off) even I have full range on both signal indicator's (3G not important but 2G is 100% range).

When I turn off the data on the SIM1 or turn on WiFI to use internet on the phone everything is OK (voice phone number on SIM2 works perfectly)

I try to change lot of settings but the problem still exist, It looks like I don't have active SIM2 card while SIM1 makes data exchange.

When I make normal phone call by SIM2, data exchange on SIM1 is switching off.

Before I do not remember that kind of problem on my phone.

Please anyone knows a solution for this??

And sorry for my english :)

UPDATE:

- when I turn off automatic data synchronization( settings, data use, auto sync.) everything works perfectlty, but the Gmail and any other online apps, need hand made sync, so it's just a partial soultion, any suggest??

Why data on SIM1 turn's off the SIM2 voice service??

Nobody helps??
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] goldynchyld:
Hello. I have a ATT S4. I rooted and flashed this custom rom, http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2356276. It was working fine no problems for a few months. Today I thought I wanted to try 4.3 and Paranoid Android and flashed the ParanoidAndroid 3.99-RC2 rom from this thread, http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2314559. My recovery is TWRP. When flashing the new ROM I did get a warning of "no file_contexts". After this my phone has refused to boot. It will turn on, load the Samsung S4 screen, and then stay stuck with this image and never start up. I can still enter recovery. I have tried flashing my original rom which worked perfectly fine before and it acts the same way. I tried to recover a backup I made in TWRP but it fails every time. I have searched in the forums and a common suggestion for bootlooping is to reflash a stock image in ODIN, but most of these people were unable to enter recovery. I would like to get the photos I have on my phone off if at all possible, however it is not a big deal. Anyone know what the issue might be so I don't have to resort to trying ODIN.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] jd1639:
It's sounds like you got a bad download of the pa rom. In the future always check the md5 of the files you down load.

If you wiped system, data, dalvik, cache, and android secure prior to flashing your nandroid and it's still not working you're going to have to use odin.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] goldynchyld:
Thanks for replying. I restored it to stock and although it was frozen at the same spot at first, it booted up properly after waiting a bit and a reset from the stock recovery. I would say I'd be more careful next time, but I still don't really know what went wrong.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] jd1639:
Having to do a factory reset after Odin to get it past the boot loop is normal. I'm guessing it was a bad download that got you in the problem in the first place. It occurs more frequently than you'd think. That's why it's always good to check the md5 of the file you downloaded
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] goldynchyld:
I was suprised since i've flashed countless roms since my s2 and have never checked a single md5. Now I've found out how to check the md5 check sum of what I have downloaded, but for future reference how do I know the reference checksum to verify they are the same? I know it may be a stupid question, but I honestly feel like I am missing something.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] jd1639:
When you download the rom there should be the md5 there. I usually just check the last 5 characters, that's as good as my memory is lol. If they're the same it's highly unlikely the others won't check too.
[LG Optimus G Pro] ashirokung:
I found thatmy gpro f240s(custom kernel) is better sound than my xperia z1(stock kernel) with flac file.

And sound quality near my old note2(wolfson sound chip).
[LG Optimus G Pro] foryou2keep:
What kernel your using?
[Motorola Atrix HD] The Android Attorney:
Title says it all: Best ROM for battery life w/o sacrificing stability and performance
[Motorola Atrix HD] magnetboard:
Stock ROM and arrrrghh's kernel. I drain the battery a lot, but it lasts me 10h oc'd to 1.8
[Motorola Atrix HD] kinvid:
I've haven't tried any other custom roms beside CM 10.1.3 stable: no bloatware, better than stock battery life, and tons of customization. I wouldn't want to try anything else.

Update#1: I've been experiencing frequent reboots through out the day. Seems to happen randomly or before and after being plug in to charge.

Update#2: Too many crashes/reboots on the CM10.1.3 stable. I couldn't take it anymore so I flash CM10.2..latest nightly. Amazing! No reboots, far stable than 10.1. Gonna stick with 10.2 for a week or two then try custom roms as ProBam and Carbon.

Update#3: So 10.2 does crash and restarts. It will happen while it is plugged in "Charging". GAPPS would crash i noticed. wth
[Motorola Atrix HD] Neighbor808:
HoloBlur, Carbon, or CyanogenMod hands down.
[Motorola Atrix HD] Legza:
4.2 ROMs (especially AOKP): +++battery, -stability.

4.3 ROMs (LiquidSmooth 2.10, Carbon): -battery, +stability.

There is no golden middle choice. However, 4.3 roms provide much more features and the battery life is compared to stock (but still worse), so, not a bad choice to try.
[Motorola Atrix HD] The Android Attorney:
Tried all everything you guys have said and I've come to the conclusion that either my battery is defective or this phone just sucks when it comes to battery life regardless or ROM or kernel. Thanks anyways
[Motorola Atrix HD] Neighbor808:
What kind of Battery life are you getting? I get anywhere from 6-8 hours with heavy use to 16 hours with light use... Stock battery btw
[Motorola Atrix HD] The Android Attorney:
One time I was playing gangstar Vegas on medium settings with lowest brightness for like 30min and the battery went all the way down to 25%. I started out with 100%. Also even on standby the battery goes down like 15% with WiFi and everything off and airplane mode on. I just don't get it. It pisses me off. The battery lasts me like let's say 8hrs with VERY VERY low usage. Like I'm talking like only maybe 25-50min screen time at like 25 percent brightness.
[Motorola Atrix HD] Dr. Orange:
Sounds like you need the MAXX battery mod. My battery will last in excess of 30 hours on one charge. The battery isn't that cheap, but imo, it was totally worth it.
[Motorola Atrix HD] RPalomo:
Best Rom

in my opinion, holoblur 0.9 tuned edition or x 0.9 Pure performance edition, are the most stable and less battery consumption, the other roms left out of the ADH standard features like HDMI mirror. The other functions that handle the other ROMS are esthetic and user support that we like to be playing with our phones giving better appearance.
[Motorola Atrix HD] The Android Attorney:
Hey guys. So went back to stock 4.1.1 and its been great. I'm using the stock kernel. I'll get the maxx battery soon or on black Friday but overall in terms of battery life, stock has it.
[Motorola Atrix HD] chowyungfatso:
So you're not running rocking the "HoloBlur-X ROM PurePerformance™ Edition" anymore?
[Motorola Atrix HD] wedgess:
There is no best ROM/Kernel, try them all and see which "best" suits you.

Thread closed
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Heisenberg:
Sorry to say it after you've written such a lengthy post, but you're in the wrong forum. This is the HTC One XL (at&t One x) forum, they're completely different phones. You'll need to ask in the HTC One X forum, we don't know enough about your phone here, sorry.

Sent from my Evita
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] sN_iPower:
Oh sorry about that :/

Sorry about that I didn't notice that I posted in the wrong forum. Thank you for letting me know, I will repost this in the correct forum ;)
[Off-topic] Krusade:
Guys I need a new adsl modem + router as my old router's range is never caught outside my room :( m looking for one which has usb ports and WHICH SUPPORTS TORRENT DOWNLOADING when pc is turned off , and NAS as well,

any suggestions would be very helpful :) thanks :)

asking here cause the networking forums i was trying to ask arent allowing new members to post things and the information they had was outdated and yahoo answers are just plain stupid :cyclops:
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] mric034:
HI, here is the mod to have all apps in multiwindow bar!

Based on N9005 with Omega v.1 and working good. Need testing for other versions...

Just replace Service.jar in /system/framework and FlashbarService.apk in /system/app. Save the original ones just in case!

Reboot and enjoy!

Note: there is a little bug when adding some apps it's another that be added in bar but not a big problem.
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] rheza02:
I can't make it work. On my stock firmware. I try to replace both of the files. But the multi window option not appear. And also it make my pen-window broken. I can't create any pen window anymore.

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] wildalan:
tnx for the effort but it doesn't work...u can't even open the multi bar.

good I kept a copy of the original files
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] mric034:
Bizarre it's working perfect for me...
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] micky387:
Be sure you are the right permission..

Envoyé depuis mon SM-N9005 avec Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] wildalan:
my rom is stock rooted....maybe urs is odexed or deodexed?

does this make a difference?
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] mric034:
Yes you need to be deodexed...
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] Tekara:
I'm currently using this app from the play store with success:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bjbinc.mwmphone

It'll walk you through installing the xposed framework when you first open it, then you can use the app to modify available applications (reboot needed after).
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] Yuhfhrh:
But that app breaks S health :(
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] Mr.Muscles:
Works perfect. And it also allows you to use xposed settings so you can change the dpi of apps and ui. Great find. Stock rooted no deodex and enjoying all the perks.
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] kofeye:
I'm deodexed and still can't get it to work mate
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] empat:
Hi! After trying that mode, I lost my multiwindow function, maybe because my rom is deodexed. Can any kind soul post the original files? I did the stupidity of erasing mine without a copy...

Thanks! Regards!
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] AllGamer:
ohh very useful, subscribed!
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] Girn:
How do you deodex stock rooted
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] neederishelp:
does anyone have the stock files? on stock, rooted. installed this without reading... and didn't back up old files
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] Riyyi:
Here you go.
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] neederishelp:
Thank you

Sent from my T-Mobile note 3
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] JoshPut:
Do I need to root first ??

SGalxyNote3
[Galaxy Note 3 Themes and Apps] neederishelp:
You need root to be able to place the files In their directories, so yes you do.

Sent from my T-Mobile note 3
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] Bro:
Hi,

I've just got a T-Mobile MDA Pro, (HTC Universal) brand spanking new, lovely windows mobile 2005 o/s ........but no msn messenger??

I've had several Htc Windows based smartphones/Pda's all of which had it built in, but I can't find it anywhere.

Anyone know how to patch this up so I can continue to use messenger without giving my log in details to third party apps?

Thanks in advance
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro General] findus:
Its built into Pocket MSN (one of the today plugins)
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] passenger001:
I'm currently using SentinelROM 5.0, which doesn't have long press volume key to switch audio tracks. Is there a very simple way for me to implement this? I don't want to switch to another ROM. Thanks!

N7100
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pakure:
Wanam xposed mod:D
[Off-topic] nicolassp:
Mod edit: We're not here to make you money. Please re-read the rules.
[Off-topic] nicolassp:
reserved
[G2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gaindauz:
My Bluetooth LG HBS-730 connected with LG G2 D802, firmware version D80210b-ESA-XX.

Everything is ok, but voice dialer (briefly press call button in BlueTooth) is not working.

My LG G2 Voice Mate give error message "Connected Device doed not support Support Bluetooth Voice Recognition. Please disconnect Bluetooth then try again".

In other Phone (S4 & Note2), all function running well, so it is not Bluetooth problem.

Is anyone have similar problem?

Are there some setting need to configure so Voice Dial can work?
[G2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gaindauz:
Nvm, it isvthr ROm seem no support thr voice dial, try with other BT same result. Waiting for the update, if any.
[G2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dzanus100:
I have the same problem

I've tried with many roms and only with stock rom working perfect
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lunelakeus:
I'm looking a calendar app. But so many calendar apps is in there.

Plz recommend calendar app.

Thanks.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] niranjan94:
I find Google Calender to be the most-featured and User friendly .. Give it a try ..

Download it from Play Store here
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wahuka:
For me Bussiness Calendar
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] KonW:
the green in the screen looks like light-green, washed-out, something you only see in defect display,

especially when youre coming from a samsung phone,

especially the first time you open your phone and see the color in the apps youre used to in other phones,,

I couldnt help but noticed the same thing and tried to do some tests to see if it's a common problem for Xperia Z ultra, or is it just some of us happend to have the same kind of defect display

of all the tests, here are the most comvincing ones:

first,

left is the one i took on desktop , right one is the screenshot on phone while playing the same youtube video in youtube app,

clealy the one on phone is more "light-green",

this is the proof that the "light-green" is intended by Sony rather than due to defect in the display, otherwise we would see a darker green like the one on desktop, (cause the screenshots took in-phone are what the hardware drew, rather than what we see from outside/what the screen displayed)

the second one

is a screenshot took in-phone, while displaying a .png pic file, on the left,, compared to what it's like when the same .png file was viewed on my Windows7, on the right.

No difference was found.

I quickly tried another pic that wasnt initially on the phone, prepared by sony,,,

here's the results:

: No difference to be found,

(when comparing i put the 2 pic file in the same folder and used a viewing software to quickly go back and forth between the 2 pics during which the same place of the 2pic was kept at the same place, zoomed by the same level,,,, and found no difference)

then, I copied the official demo video(Xperia HD Landscapes.MP4) to my desktop, screencaptured a frame to compare to the same one played on phone,

here's the result:

the one on the right is what the video looks like when played on my desktop,,,the result doent need anymore of my words.

So the conclusion:

While initially you may find the color , especially in google apps(casue they are the apps with obvious color youre most familiar with), washed-out,

the screen is not defect and can show the color green 100% fine,

it's most likely due to some Sony's weird software tweak,

which happened to all the video the phone plays, where the green is really "light" and feels unpleasantly "washed-out".

I can only hope Sony fix this problem as fast as possible, cause compared to Samsung 's famous oversaturating tweak(actually more due to the "side-effect" of being able to display a wider color gamut), which made almost everything on their phone looked absolutely more stunning and awesome,, Sony's tweak can only be concluded as, considering their long history in the industry and all the hype/triluminous/bravio engine/blahblahblah said in their ads,,,,, the most embarassingly retarded fail I've ever seen by such a giant multinational corporation.

any ideas?
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Ryland Johnson:
I went from Samsung Galaxy S3 etc to the Sony Xperia Z and Sony Xperia tablet 10.1. There is a difference between the two screens. The screen colours on the tablet are simply stunning and to my taste.

I have just made a return to Samsung and bought the Note 3 and can safely say that I prefer the picture reproduction on the Sony. Different screen technologies produce different colours, light, contrast and definition. To me I see this simply as taste and not a 'fault' in either device.

I prefer the colour pallet of my Xperia tabet 10.1 to the new Note 3. I think we have to understand its a preference. I don't arrive at the same conclusions you do. I prefer what you appear to dislike.

Regards.
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] KonW:
It's fine if it's only a tweak in the video playing,, if the green has to be lighter in a coloful video wiht all the other colors to contribute to a better viewing experience,

but the green and red in many apps in the phone are also washed out(doesnt in any way can possibly contribute to any thing except making you feel like looking at a 10 years old LCD with washed out colors)

I admit it really scared me at first, which may be the reason i did all these tests in the first place,,
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Guzprom:
I believe you cant compare with screenshot, as its just copying digital values of the screen. You will have to capture side by side with a good slr camera (live output) to compare results. I did a bit side by side comparison on some videos in a shop when i wanted to buy. But put off my purchase until i am sure.
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Hidden92:
Please add some words because I can't really see much difference there?
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] KonW:
here i did painting to help you see the difference:
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] KonW:
since screenshot showed us the difference we felt when looking at the display,,,it at least now represents the problem at hand,,

if it doenst, then the problem might be beyond screenshot(exp, quality of the glass above the LCD,etc), then we can use a camera to shoot the difference
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Guzprom:
Yes, if your assumption that the colors are so because of sony preprocessing. I believe screenshot will only show the effect of display preprocessing by the hardware/software but it won't show the end result of the inherent properties (color gamut/ depth, warmth/white balance) of the screen itself. Correct me if I'm wrong. And I would be interested in an SLR shot. :)
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] bASKOU:
Exactly, screenshots do not give you the screen colors. The difference you see is only due to the JPEG compression. Do a color comparison with JPEG is also not accurate as well, different devices will show you different results even on the same screen. Only specific camera can really do it, can't be done with any commercial camera or camcorder as well. As the refresh rate and backlight are different between screen and screen orientation as well (portrait and landscape).

Envoyé depuis mon C6802 avec xda premium 4
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] KonW:
I never said it's accurate, and as i said above it wont address the problems that could occur to affect the colors after hardware rendering,

it' like,, if youre asking your doctor what the reddness in your palm mean, what kinda of illness could it suggest, by sending him a pic file of your palm (in jpeg form might i add),,,, yeah it's not accurate nor is it real,,but it at least does the job, if your doctor says he needs further investigation then you can consider sending him a "specifi camera" taken over-100MB-in-size TIFF file of your palm for accuracy.

since the jpeg file i used here already showed very obviously the difference we felt when looking at the screen,, what's the point of using another more accurate file format?

i was wondering about the same thing while doing the comparison,,

for example,, in one part of a pic it asked for the color of RGB(0,255,0), the screen tried to display RGB(0,255,0) but it looked different in our eyes than the RGB(0,255,0) displayed elsewhere, say my windows7 desktop(LCD display also),

Now i screencap the display, that place in the screencap file should be recorded as RGB(0,255,0) too,

so when i view the file on my desktop windows7, if it looked "normal" then it should be a problem of the phone display , if it looked like what we felt on the phone, then the display shouldnt be defective. (becasue that proves that it only looked different casue sony tweaked it so that it displays RGB(0,200,0) for the color RGB(0,255,0) in that specifi frame to look more appealing to the eye, not that it wasnt able to show a deeper RGB(0,255,0) color)

Now you may have doubt that when i screencapture on the phone, will the pic file record that place as RGB(0,255,0)? what if it was recorded ,say a lighter green, RGB(0,200,0) becasue it's what it's lilke and the screen wasnt able to display the color other normal screen displayed as RGB(0,255,0).

well, if that's the case then the same pic file showing the same green should look different on phone and desktop, which is certainly not true as my comparison 2 and 3 showed.

So, that screencap did work, at least in that comparison.

and now fianlly ,,

I do agree that we should use a camera to shoot together of a desktop LCD and the phone displaying the same pic file (AMOLED would obviously display a "greener" green for RGB(0,255,0) becasue of its wider color gamut), and then compare the green in that shoot, to cover any other issues , especially ones that could happen after the hardware rendering.:D:D
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] bASKOU:
You are just comparing Sony firmware compression of an image display on the screen. It is not even about accuracy. Plug your phone by HDMI to a TV and make a screen shot, do you think the rendering will show how the TV displayed your picture?

Test on the phone itself.

Here original picture

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/66462768/MG_0133.jpg

Here the screenshot of the same picture on my XZU

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/66462768/Screenshot_2013-10-07-14-26-12.png

How come thank the screenshot show more saturated colors than the original picture on my XZU?

As one test is not enough now have the screenshot of a Asus transformer prime

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/66462768/Screenshot_2013-10-07-14-23-14.jpg

The IPS+ on my tf201 show pictures lighter with more saturated colors than my XZU, but the screenshot give the opposite. Asus compression is different and Sony compression give even more saturated colors that the original picture.

Edit: uploaded to dropbox for avoid compression on XDA. Sorry for the size ^^
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] KonW:
what is your point exactly?

of course they would look different,

different device has its different tweak of displaying colors,

in case you still dont see my point: some company , for exampl LG, tweak their saturation to look like the samsung or to look better(for example, if a pic ask for 25% green, the display is tweaked to show 50% deep green), a screenshot of course will show differently, unless it's the defective display that oversaturated or undersaturated the pic,,,which when screencaptured and showed at the same time in another display should look all the same.(explained in detail in my last post).