yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
Make sure you have mounted your system as read/write, because default setting (despite root) on android is read only as it should.

Check and report.

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
Here you go. https://db.tt/XR7gyfhi

I think you can install also as data app.

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ManuMu:
Thank you for your reply.

What is strange is that with other kernels, I do not have to do manipulations to mount the system R/W. For example, with Perseus kernel, I see that the permissions are R/O, I can still copy a file in system/app with EsFileExplorer.

Have you another idea ?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
This is not possible. At all.

If system is read only you can't do NOTHING on it.

I think you misunderstood what I am talking about: before you try to add something in system you must mount as writeble from es file explorer settings.

There's no other way it can be possible, trust me. And this is normal way it should be.

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ManuMu:
Okay. But here the problem is that I can not mount the system in writing. ESFile said: operation failed. Do you still have another idea or solution? Thank you
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
Ok now i understand.

Just clean es file explorer data (from system settings/applications menu) and reboot.

If continue to not work let me know (anyway I don't ever had this problem and I think could be rom related).

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ManuMu:
Even if I delete the data EsFile, I still can not mount the system in writing ...

I'll see with my cook rom but apparently it does not have this problem.

Again thank you for your help.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
Provide a logcat if you still have problems, maybe we can find a solution. On which rom you are now?

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ManuMu:
I'm on the last base 4.1.2 Samsung .... Cooked by a French team ....
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
I am wondering to know if es file explorer in this rom is included as system app.

Can you update from playstore (if is so) and try again?

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ManuMu:
Indeed, ESFile is a system app, but I found my solution. I rebooted into recovery, fix permissions then flash the rom ... Dude thank you for your help!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] BigBake88:
Any chance a 7105/i317 version of this kernel will be available?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] :
Quite silent in this thread.. Good, as it means that everything is working superbly fine, but don't forget to thank Umberto for his awesome work!! Keep it up man!

Note 2 N7100 - Alliance ROM - SpeedWizz kernel
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
Or it means that no one is using this kernel at all (or at least only two or three of us) LOL

Btw a new version is coming with some new feature. Look at my github (don't mind the last reverted commit, I readded correctly the patch because the first time I applied it caused the compilation stopping).

If I don't sell this device soon I will release it in this week

i Totally disagree with samsung **** policy....

Next time only Nexus for sure.

(I hope Chainfire can break their a** as always, to make me change idea for the next future). Meh....

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] :
Aw I agree perfectly with your point of view!! Sad news if you sell it though!! :P

Eagerly waiting for the next awesome update now?

Cheers and keep up the good work mate, pure awesomeness!!

Note 2 N7100 - Alliance ROM - SpeedWizz kernel
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Minerael:
Does this kernel can be used only with samsung official roms?

if so, are you planing to do an aosp version? I would love to try it out but I hate touchwizz, running cyanogenmod pretty much all the time ;)

greetings from Poland!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
This is planned for the near future.

Off topic: I respect your point of view and i love cyanoven or aosp too: but i think that note devices give their optimum features state with samsung rom.... aosp is missing too many things, by my point of view.

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
Sorry for double post.

https://db.tt/I2SOJMQa

Here you can test a beta version of the kernel.

There is not a changelog but to track the difference between this and the previously released image just check github.

Slide2wake is ported from siyah for s3 kernel (credits go to gokhanmoral) and is obviously adapted to our hardware (as long as note 2 uses a different touch panel).

The feature is working but if device enter deep sleep this stop working (you need to swipe 8 or more times to wake the screen).

To manage this you can use trickstermod.

I will not release until the feature is not working well.

Enjoy.

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk now Free
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Minerael:
Thank you, will take a look at beta and if course will be waiting for fully working one :)

Off topic:

Well, you may be right however in my case, I've bought note 2 only because of the screen and 2 gb of ram, what's more i don't really use samsung features, excluding spen gestures which i have on cyan as well :P

I don't like stock Samsungs rom because it's slow, full of useless things, which can of course be deleted with little help of root but still. Lastly, i don't like the look of touchwizz, it's just ugly haha.

Anyway, Thanks for your responses, good luck in further developing! :)

Wysłane z mojego GT-N7100 przy użyciu Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] frezd:
Thanks a lot. Perfectly working.

Waiting for the v3? official release. We do use your kernel ! :) The best for me now combined with viper4android and some tweaks elsewhere...Perfect combination !

Cheers,

--------------
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] myaslioglu:
I am now on 4.3 leak. I was using your kernel and very happy with it.. there aint no official or unofficial source for 4.3 is there? I would be happy to use this kernel again
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] :
Pretty silent in here! ;)

Just a little note: Android logger is enabled in my configuration, but it seems to have some little glitch, an app called light manager, which uses it to change led color according to the app which is giving a notification (ex blue led for facebook, green for SMS and email... ) doesn't work on speedwizz kernel and shows only blue led for each app. I experienced this issue once before,i think on Perseus kernel, and it was due to my error, since I disabled Android logger.now on speedwizz I enabled it but I am having the same issue, hence I think there might be some bug with it..

Can't wait to see what goodies will come with new version ;)

Cheers!

Note 2 N7100 - Alliance ROM - SpeedWizz kernel
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] 8thphloor:
Here on latest speedwizz release light manager works without any kind of issues (it shows the right colors) with android logger disabled and also if i enable it. So it's not a logger problem nor kernel related issue/bug.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] :
That's strange since light manager relies explicitly on Android logger to manage led events... Moreover, it was alright with previous kernel version, now I only see blue notification and none of the colors I set up are respected..

Note 2 N7100 - Alliance ROM - SpeedWizz kernel
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
There will not be any new version. Development is stopped because I don't have this device anymore.

Despite my git hub is updated with the latest changes I had to include...I don't really know if I can release a new version (very busy for the next weeks).

Very sorry. But I don't want to play with a device that seems to me like a walking dead....

I really hope that Samsung will left aside those stupid things from official updates in the future.

See you soon brothers. And thank you for giving a try to my project.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stam91:
Oh, nooo! The only kernel with incredible performance and battery savior) Frustrating, wishing you good luck and thanks for tasting this nice project. Btw, if you don't bother, please, send me name of the best kernel you recommend to use in exchange to SpeedWizz via PM. Thanks again!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
If i ever had the chance to find the best kernel for my person do you think I could ever had the need to start myself a project?

Go, and try to figure out what fits better your need.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] BenRoark:
Sorry to see you go, maestro.

I found Speedwizz to be the best of the lot. Thanks for your hard work.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rraaka:
ah, just looked in to say the 4.3 sources have been released by samsung
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] RobbyRobbb:
Well damn it. This kernel makes the pen unusable. Is it really that difficult to add such information to the topic header? This is the Note II after all and people deserve to know before they flash.

Now i have to figure out how to get the stock kernel back. But before that i might as well ask; how am i supposed to configure this kernel anyway? Do i even need to configure it or does it activate good settings automatically? The SpeedWizz app has a lot of options that i doubt anyone who isn't a developer knows what to do with. Would be nice with a guide on how to actually configure this.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] 8thphloor:
There aren't info about pen because there aren't knowed problems with pen and this kernel. This kernel rocks and the speedwizz app is so easy, complete and confortable to set up. Maybe, if you feel unconfortable with the option that dev gave to us, you need to improve your basics skills on android world before posting as you made without respect for the dev's great work.

Easy man! ;)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] RobbyRobbb:
The option that the dev gave us wasn't supposed to include breaking s-pen. When you get a hair in your soup at a restaurant it doesn't matter if it's the best soup in the best restaurant in the world. You're still disgusted.

When a person flashes a kernel for which every announced feature does work except one (the pen in this case), which there isn't a single mentioning of in the OP, it's common practice to assume that this feature isn't supported rather than you having the bad luck of that ONE feature for some reason not working on your completely stock phone. That just doesn't happen. That's how the world works, "man".

With that said, since the pen doesn't work for me having flashed this kernel over a 4.1.2 stock Samsung rom, when the pen does work with other kernels, something is clearly lacking with this kernel. As much as i appreciate people working hard to make the products of others run better, i can't really enjoy a kernel that disables a feature that to me is majorly important unless the developer helps me analyze and fix the problem. If not i'll simply have to stay with another kernel with respect and appreciation replaced by frustration and disappointment when thinking of this kernel, don't i?

Easy yourself.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
The reason why you don't see any advice related to s-pen functionality is, as stated by some one else before, BECAUSE there is NOT any issue with s-pen, or at least no one (including me) has noticed nothing like this. Also i didn't broken intentionally nothing related to s-pen.

All phones are not equal and maybe something is wrong with your hardware and code included in my kernel...but i don't think it's really this the problem...too easy and superficial explanation.

Since this is a free of charge project, let me say this, all is possible: errors, mistakes...i am a human that is sharing something with a community. For this reason i can say that you entered this thread with the wrong key: your claim (you pretend explanations like a "ready dish" and pretend an advice for something that you have discovered for the really first time) shows that you are acting like a noob.

Anyway i don't own this device anymore (selled it also because of people like you :p :p ) and this thread will be closed soon (under my request) and please leave this thread and go switch to any other kernel.

But if you want a suggestion: change your attitude, mate. This is a community, not a market. You can't pretend NOTHING.

And if you can't enjoy this kernel....well i DGAF. Keep in mind.

Easy, very easy to understand :good:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] RobbyRobbb:
Oh i will keep that in mind. Your goal is indeed very easy to understand. Admitting your true spirits and lack of interest is an important part of helping the community too; it makes it easy for people with high standards to know who's projects to avoid in the future. :good:

As you've revealed yourself to be such a hypocrite in the regard of providing for the community, i have a suggestion for you too: don't loose your professionalism over negative feedback. It smittens the aura of your products as well as your own. People won't remember my input, but they certainly will remember yours.

Now that we both have given each other valuable suggestions (some more valuable than others) to carry with us over our continued journey on this road we call community, i wish for the best of luck with your future endeavors in this, to some, most enigmatic realm of supply and demand.

Peace out, Seacrest.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
I am not afraid of negative criticism (had many every day and they help me to understand meny things, even they help me to get better on what i do), as well as your's is not a negative criticism but only a non sense advice.

Do you want to know the right way to expose an issue? Right...here you go.

Normal User: "Hi. Anyone with an issue with s-pen?"

NON-normal user: "Why don't you advice in OP that s-pen doesn't work with your kernel?"

There's a huge difference between the two kind of statement.

The first one introduce an issue for the first time, causing on developer the interest on investigate on what is causing the issue, if possible.

The second one introduce a sense of arrogance and a sense of claim that cause on developer anger and frustration due to the fact of having to deal with people like you.

Hope you understand my message and change your way of seeing things.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
I have not been clear enough. The only thing here is wrong, in my honest opinion , is the way you pose the question or problem .

The approach is totally wrong, I do not sell products here . What we find in these pages is just a project reshared with other people. That's why I want to emphasize that it is important to know that nothing is

owed

: is more of a matter of principle , the claim is unnecessary and harmful.

I believe that this kernel has been used by more than one user , and no one has ever reported faults on the operation of the s -pen ( as you have said , but apparently you insist on not understand) and this should explain sufficiently why there is no reference in the OP .

What is perhaps not clear to you is that if you had asked the question or the problem with less arrogance would have been answered completely different , perhaps less hypocritical , maybe less arrogant and maybe even more polite .

In life "You're going to reap just what you sow " as Lou Reed sang ..

And one more thing: i am not afraid about moderators think (with all the respect), if you think you scare me you're wrong.

If needed i will continue this stupid discussion until I can not make you understand my point of view.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] EclipseX:
sorry dude, i've install this kernel, and like dev said, there is no issue at all

any other user have probleme with S-Pen? no? thank you very much =)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] janobifronte:
absolutely no

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] crisgen:
S-Pen works with any issue.

Edit: if I understand correctly developer have to write in OP that something does not work even if it works?

Right?

Funny.....really funny....

Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rayarny:
(

You Sir...need to read a bit more first and before claiming it affects a thousand users (which it no way does) get some evidence of it!...And last but not the least...you are always welcome to some other kernel...Oh did I mention? N00B!! If you arent happy with certain something, have a bit of self respect and create ur own stuff, or if u want to complain (bug report) do it in a civilised way!..Ah tired of these people!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pelonero111:
ciao umberto,aggiornerai il kernel per la stock 4.3?

hello umberto, you will update the kernel to the stock 4.3?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
No, sorry. It is not in the plans.

Inviato dal mio Nexus 4
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pelonero111:
I'm so sorry it is a beast of kernel!!!!!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Mashed_Potatoes:
Sweet kernel. Had problems with NEAK and one more kernel making the phone power off with screen off.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rico13:
this kernel is great with battery life

one of the reasons why I'm still on 4.1
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] lizzardking.:
Howdie mate

Can this kernel boost my sound in calls out calls , speaker and all that? the volume is soo soo low on true android

I cant stand this on original android, thats the only reason why i dont move to this until there is a solution..

so this is a check up :)

is there a solution?

thanks in advanced!!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rico13:
yeah you can turn sound up with the included boeffla sound app :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] umberto1978:
I don't understand what you mean, sorry...

Can you explain more clearly?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Mashed_Potatoes:
I said that i had problems with NEAK Kernel, the phone would reboot itself when the phone is locked.

Everything is fine with Speedwizz
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] aftnoon2:
For me, also everything is fine with Speedwizz...But things were also fine with Neak...:laugh:....

The only thing I miss a little is the SmartassV2 governor, which I think is a little more battery friendly than luzlactiveq. Just nothing important when you carry a bulky 6000MaH batt which never goes to 5%...:)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] khosa04:
Can it be used on stock rooted 4.3 note2..I am using the custom rom which I downloaded by OTA update..seems to be a good kernel...:)) reply..

---------- Post added at 06:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:43 PM ----------

Plzzz reply...anybody...I really want to use a good kernel..:) plzzz do reply...
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Niksie:
Sadly.. no. This kernel is 4.1.2 based ROMs only.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] aftnoon2:
You have some other Kernel options under "Original Android Development", just a click behind...:)

Do a Nandroid, bckp your apps, just in case. But new kernels for 4.3 seem good.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] DJChriZZ:
I use the kernel since yesterday, seems to be a very nice one :) I use wanam rom 3.9 (android 4.12) and now with speedwizz.

the device feels a little quicker in response and multitask / starting apps.

the batery life .... hard to test :) I have a ZeroLemon 9300 mA/H monster - flux generator - on my note 2 and it's awsome :) I play much Ingress but the batery has power and power ....
[One (M7) General] Jason Syn:
Now where do I find the RUU to hit my T-Mobile One with this guy? :laugh:

http://www.gottabemobile.com/2013/09/24/htc-one-android-4-3-update-roll-begins/
[Nexus 7 (2013) Original Android Development] Tasssadar:
The patch was updated with commit https://github.com/Tasssadar/androi...mmit/20f59235cf61694f8118b943e33aa382fc9ad494 in repositories and on gist.

The reason is that my initial ramdisk address was not compatible with all kernels, and changing it resulted in a problem to appear on CM kernel - it just crashes on kexec-hardboot call. AOSP kernel worked just fine after the change, but I applied the patch just to be sure. Sorry about this, I didn't expect the patch to change at all, but it happened :/ I really hope this is the last time.

[MENTION=4238916]ayysir[/MENTION] originaly made this change, thanks.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Original Android Development] rootdefyxt320:
[MENTION=3418703]Tasssadar[/MENTION] I would like to port your kexec-hardboot patch on my device which has a Qualcomm MSM7225A chipset with a locked bootloader. How do I locate the memory addresses in adb shell to boot the kernel? Thanks. I'm currently using Fedora 64-bit on my computer.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] undernewbie:
Is there any secret code for Magician and PPC in general ?
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] jimmy-bish:
Yeah, if you hit up, down, down, right, action you'll get unlimited lives! :D
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] ultimasnake:
I think he means codes lik the old nokias had to get into developer/debug menus :p

the answer i can give is, not that we all know off :P
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] vijay555:
With MS devices, there's a gazillion registry hacks that would probably be considered the equivalent. Not all that exciting, but depends what you're after!

V
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] elyl:
Type 112<call> and you get some angry visitors to your house!
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] Chatty:
I think in bootloader mode there are some "unofficial" commands... but wouldn't risk my device for testing those...
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] jmlape:
I just flashed PA 3.69 on my phone. I am getting a lot of app incompatibility messages in the play store. I've done a little reading on this issue and it seems somewhat common. Is there an easy fix for this? Seems kind of strange that this is happening since I see that PA is an extremely popular rom. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] asrah:
Check the build.prop of your device against the build.prop of a stock GS3. Some ROM features may have caused your build.prop to include values that are different from a stock GS3. If the build.prop files are the same, then i suggest reinstalling PA 3.69, and completely redoing the sign in process for the play store. You do not need to factory reset if you are reinstalling the exact same ROM file. It may help to delete your cache and dalvik cache after the reinstall, and before the reboot into android
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] dssking:
Is it possible to customize the phone app in Task650? I'd like the stock phone app from 4.1.1 where the display is

larger and the name of the caller is also large.

Is this possible?? Otherwise, I like the Task650 ROM (finally loaded).

Thanks

DSSKing