yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Yeti47:
Especially now, 1 up!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] adripred:
Gooooooooooooooollllllllll from Germany!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] metalgearhathaway:
Never seen a more deserved goal!

Schweinsteiger is a real hero as well!

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] adripred:
Goodbye Argentina!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] eric-filth:
Goodbye.

Any team is better win than Argentina.

Congratz Germany. Very good world cup.

Enviado do meu GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] metalgearhathaway:
Phew, well deserved Germany! Bravo! Can't believe this Englishman felt so passionately for their win!

The replays of the goal show it as totally would class, so much pressure! What relief and happiness all Germans must feel tonight!

The lads did you proud!

I wonder if this thread will be cleaned lol :)

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] adripred:
Germany and SAP wins!!! Congratulations!!!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Yesssssss!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] adripred:
The best teams runs SAP!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] flither:
Post #100 and...

Congratulations Germany!!!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
As a gift for the title, I will give 2.4 beta1 in both normal and NG versions to you before Wednesday.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] keneth_c:
Congrats Andi...

World Champs once again...

We got 4 stars now...

What a rush!

Loved to see them life the world cup for the 2nd time in my lifetime....

Amaziiiinnnngggg feeling!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Failyx:
GERMANY WUHUUU[emoji322][emoji629][emoji322][emoji629]
[Galaxy S III Android Development] SuperAce609:
Hahaha oh man. This thread is so gonna get cleaned.

After I saw what they did to Brasil, I just knew it.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
Guys can anyone please give me a zram profile setting that is working good for multitasking between apps. Thanks.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] boyheadkick:
20

25

45

70

95

120
[Galaxy S III Android Development] SuperAce609:
240 zram @ 100 swappiness.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] boyheadkick:
oh crap..i thought he meant LMK..my bad :angel:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] SuperAce609:
Haha I was wondering what those numbers were for. They seemed very familiar.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] metalgearhathaway:
Out of curiosity, do you not find you get adverse battery drain and/or sluggish operation with those zram settings?

I could be wrong here and I am keen to know if it's good because my understanding was that high zram memory values would mean the device has limited real ram and that it would end up with the device swapping memory a lot which in turn would have a negative impact both on battery but also take its toll on available CPU cycles?

Also with 100 rated swappiness, I think that would be swapping all the time? Further accelerating the potential issues i mentioned above?

Of course if you notice no negatives then it's perfect! I'm not criticising but simply very interested to know, how does your device compare to life without any zram?

Cheers :)

Sent from my GT-I9300

---------- Post added at 07:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 AM ----------

I find that 100mb (as 4 devices) and swappiness of 40 works perfectly without over limiting real fast ram availability. The swappiness of 40 means (or at least I thought) that the device will not race to use the zram, but waits a little longer before choosing to go through the compression of data, which I believe would steal some CPU cycles, in turn slowing down system performance in the process.

Don't forget, your device has 1gb of ram, of you take large portions of it and use it as zram, then you leave yourself with less real fast ram, which will limit your devices ability a little, so it's important to work out what your actual requirement is.

My suggestion is to start with a small zram partition and increase each day until you have found your sweet spot.

It is also good if you share your testing experience back on the forum too :thumbup:

I'm interested to hear back from super ace and anyone who has performed in depth analysis, I have, but I'm not a total authority!

More input on this topic would be interesting.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
2.4-beta1

Good morning,

before I will be literally offline for the rest of this week (at least) due to my relocation, I just uploaded a last beta version for you all. I call it "World Championship Edition" after Germanys win yesterday in the football world champion final :)

This version is available for:

CM11

CM11 NG (all features like CM11, just basis is pure Samsung source code update13)

Omnirom

Omnirom NG (all features like Omnirom, just basis is pure Samsung source code update13)

Version 2.4-beta1

14.07.2014

Update to zzmoove 0.9-beta3 (credits to ZaneZam)

Implement double-touch-to-wake (this is NOT how the LG G2 works, it just replaces the single tap in existing touch wake by a double tap) - credits to arter97

Mali driver update with sources by n7100 (credits to JustArchi)

Fix non-working MDNIE negative mode (only Omnirom)

Enjoy

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] you_man:
Is there a difference between the 2.4-beta1 and 2.4-beta1c?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Only the version information ?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] boyheadkick:
quick question andi, how does touch wake delay differentiate from knock on delay?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
It is in the end the same.

touch wake requires you to tap once on your display within a specific time to wake the device up again.

if you enable knock on, you need two taps instead of one.

Thats all about it.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] SuperAce609:
Performance is perfectly fine for me. As for battery, with 7000mAh, I'm really not the guy you should be asking.

Either way I'm running -100UV both GPU and CPU and GPU under clocked to the low preset profile of 266/160/.../50 (forgot the values). Battery is great for me. Lulzactive q 300-1704.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] boyheadkick:
Crap, I got the camera connection bug with latest beta..

-aL

tapatalked from my super duper palm top computer
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Maybe you installed camera fixes a while ago?

Meanwhile, most of the camera issues without these fixed are supposed to be fixed.

What was the last version where you had it working?

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] boyheadkick:
Never flashed those camera fixes andi...last version working is 2.3 stable..i'm back on it now..

-aL

tapatalked from my super duper palm top computer
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
I really "love" that mess :)

So I guess you are not on latest nightly etc?

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] 200:
camera issue

Same issue here on the latest nightly (Omni and CM) :crying:

I have just flashed 2.4beta1-NG, see if this will make any difference...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Toniooo:
I noticed that in 2.4 beta 1 NG the knock on is incompatible with the pocket mode, while the in the version not NG both work well together.

thanks for all your hard work Lord Boeffla!!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Ok, so I flashed 2.4-beta1 now as non-NG and as NG version.

Made multiple photos and multiple videos with stock CM cam without any hitch.

It is weird as always :(

Whatever pocket mode does exactly. I am not using CM11 a lot.

Maybe you can explain how the issue materializes, then I can try to look into it in 2 weeks or so.

Thanks

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Nic2215:
I flashed 2.4 ng 1 the cm stock camera has no issue but I noticed my phone is so much hotter, 52 degree back with 2.3/2.3a whenever I go the app to check at most it'd 44. I don't play games, nor watch videos with my phone. Just fb, XDA app, and whatsapp

Anyone face this too or this is an isolated case?.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Most people reported, with the NG kernel their phone indeed stays cooler.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] boyheadkick:
No worries andi...i'll stick with the stable release for now and wait for a new build from carbon..then i'll test again..

-aL

tapatalked from my super duper palm top computer
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
And which stable release does work for you?

2.3 or 2.3a?

I guess 2.3, and 2.3a will also not work as it uses the same initramfs than the NG kernel.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Yeti47:
I'm using latest cm11 nightly and ng beta and asop camera takes photos with no issues. Even created 2 videos with snaps during the process and all perfect. ☺
[Galaxy S III Android Development] kusakhan:
Not solved issue camera falied in jb 4.3 ... i installed 5.4 beta 1 kernal please fix the issue ....
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Toniooo:
Hi Andi pocket mode is an option of lock screen notification that use the proxymity sensor to wake the phone when it pulled out of pocket,

if this option is enabled knock on does not work anymore.

Thanks for all
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ginzo:
Dear Andi, I confirm you that NG kernel keeps my s3 cooler than the other one same version for CM

☺

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] d1rekt0r:
Is NG made public yet ?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] upss16:
Gr8 battery life with latest 2.3a Omni version used with temasek v113. Thanks andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
First: Wrong thread, you are in the CM/Omnirom thread, not Samsung.

Second: Read the FAQ on the homepage, everything is described step by step what you need to do.

Oh yes, have you overlooked my announcement befrore?

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] shabtab:
What is the difference in NG version?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] szunyi77:
Hello, touch-to-wake that should work? To activate it, but the screen does not turn off after waking. Is set to 500ms .. 2.4 beta kernel, l-droid rom.

Sent from my Galaxy SIII is a real iPhone killer! ;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Why are you ppl never read change logs, neither on the homepage nor in the threads? :cyclops:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=54132815&postcount=4490

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
You mean touch-to-wake or the knockOn feature?

But yes, both should work. However does not seem to work together with pocket mode.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] shabtab:
Sorry!! was trying to find the changelog only,, and Thank You....
[Galaxy S III Android Development] szunyi77:
Sorry, knock on feature thought. Lock screen, but does not solve! What am I doing wrong?

Sent from my Galaxy SIII is a real iPhone killer! ;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
I do not know :)

Post screenshot from your touch-wake / knockon settings pls.

Then please post step by step what you do and how.

Thanks

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cloudx720:
God dammit! Seem to have the massive battery drain and heat issue again :( had it with archi kernel, having it with cm11 ng kernel too :( battery stats not showing anything unusual but some things not right. Battery just drains really fast while not using my phone at all.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
What does BetterBatteryStats say?

What is the deep sleep rate after 1 hour not touching the device?

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] szunyi77:
Is set up. After lock Tap screen does not unlock the screen!

Sent from my Galaxy SIII is a real iPhone killer! ;)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] marenp:
Same here...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
For me it is working fine.

szunyi, according to your configuration, after screen goes of you need to

- within 10 seconds after screen off

- DOUBLE tap the screen to switch it on again

And make sure you have pocket mode switched off in the rom settings.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cloudx720:
Checking now :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ficko_98:
you are probably press the lock button and then trying to double tap screen, that is incorrect, you need to wait for screen timeout then double tap, then it should work.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Yep, just like touch wake before as well. No change at all, just double tap instead of single tap :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] flither:
Finally I found out why Knock On feature wasn't working for me. As I suspected it has to do something with double-tap-statusbar-to-sleep built in my rom. So - KnockOn is working, but only double tapping statusbar area! Which is even better than whole screen :good:

Also there are no problems with camera for me with 2.4 beta1 omni.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Thanks, that info might be very helpful for others as well.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] xpmode:
I guess Germany had Boeffla Kernel installed on their players.

On topic: Will the Update 13 based kernel have all the features the smdk4x12 kernel has?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
It has already all the features in.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] boyheadkick:
Omni stable 2.3

-aL

tapatalked from my super duper palm top computer
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Ok, then I would assume 2.3a breaks it for you again. Although I just updated the initramfs from 08.07. to 12.07.

Unbelievable how they change things every time again... breaking compatibility :(

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] dona3000:
can someone paste a working download link for 2.3a stable please?? the website is down and the other download website (kunde.de whatever) is ****ty as **** this is really terribly organized...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
www.boeffla-kernel.de works fine for me.

And the real download site behind (boeffla.df-kunde.de) is something you should never even try to use directly. The structure is changing often.

2.3a stable of what? CM or Omnirom?

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] mortoss:
Hi,

Is knock-on feature preventing cpu from going deep sleep?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
for the time you configured for touch-wake, yes, as before.

The only change is: double tap instead of single tap. nothing else changes.

And after the configured time is over, it gets deactivated again and cpu will deep sleep.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] 2phazt:
After 4 days of testing the NG-kernel on the latest CM nightly i can only say: IT ROX!

Even OC 400-1704 in combination with UV-100 is working fine.

The camera (snapcam) is working as it should even with snapshots while taking videos.

Bluetooth with my caraudio is also working fine and WLAN is stable.

Video and audio stream are working properly and dont stutter (only tested in WLAN).
[Galaxy S III Android Development] tisazalay:
Regarding Touch To Wake, on NG, it will only work when Proximity sensor is disabled ("it was once referred as red eye monster for people on Temasek's). It's so for "samsung" sources, it's easily reproduced on "Stock" kernel (5.x/6.x) for stock roms (I think I reported it a while back either on ArchiROM 1.x or Boeffla's Stock Kernel thread). When using smdkx12 sources (non NG versions of the kernel), it won't happen.

Whatever app that has the proximity sensor turned on, will disable the touch to wake.

Now, please tell me if I'm wrong, but the Proximity sensor ON drains far less battery than the wakelock for the Touch to wake (for the same amount of time), that's why I prefer waking the phone with the sensor rather than touching the screen.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Moster2:
Yes, you are right. The sensor uses less battery than keeping the phone from going into deep sleep.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] NickName98:
but the sensor will stay on forever :/
[Galaxy S III Android Development] tisazalay:
Yes, I have it running continuosly for the past 4 months or more.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Abo3mood:
NG is available for download ?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
www.boeffla-kernel.de

YES :)
[Galaxy S III Android Development] abhibnl:
Is the NG version also updated with latest mali drivers?

Sent from Galaxy S3 Powered by Archi + Boeffla
[Galaxy S III Android Development] kouros17:
The only problem with CM11 NG version (in temasek rom) that i have some lags in games. All the rest works perfectly, but I did not see any noticeable difference in performance compared to another kernel.

Thanks a lot for your work Andi!
[Galaxy S III Android Development] glockaki:
for me the knock on only works if i enable the double tap to sleep feature on status barthrough settings on cm 11 rom.only then.but i like it!as for the battery i will keep the ng kernel to test it more.cm11 nightly 12-7-14 rom,boeffla ng test 2.4.1 kernel.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Full HD:
YES, too! Here the website, like Andi posted before, to read the changelog:

http://boeffla.df-kunde.de/sgs3/boeffla-kernel-cm-ng/cm11.0/changelog.htm

http://boeffla.df-kunde.de/sgs3/boeffla-kernel-omni-ng/omni11/changelog.htm

Confirmed! On CM11 and Omni kernel of 2.4 beta-1. I noticed a little lag, too. Please change to 2.3 stable or use a boeffla app profile with more performance.

Do you expect any wonders from development regarding to performance of this kernel? ;) It is "only" the change to the samung kernel sources.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] khanmein:
got abit not smooth on CM11 NG.. maybe u can switch to OMNI NG
[Galaxy S III Android Development] SuperAce609:
So I updated to the latest beta and started playing with the touch to wake feature, something I've never had before. I didn't know what it was so I read up on the website the detailed functions of the app (still amazing job on detailing everything Andi), and after understanding what it does, I realized my concept of it was wrong all along.

I always thought you could replace the power button with that feature. Like double tap the screen instead of pushing a hardware button. Not for a limited time after the screen goes off, but all the time. Then I started thinking what a giant battery drain that would be so I decided to leave it off. But at least now I know what it does.

Side note, I'm having problems updating the boeffla app. After downloading, the install button doesn't work. I tap it and nothing happens. Would that be a rom or an app issue?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] VictorLapin:
Had that issue once, cured by phone reboot.

Tapatalked from Slim Nexus 7
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Nic2215:
+1 so true. Maybe I'm used to omni kernel for cm rom as well. When I use this omni based always so much smoother and less heat too. Saw ur post immediately ditched the cm one again :thumbup::sly:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Notor1ouS-:
slimkat 6.0 with boeffla omni 2.4beta (NG) here.

insanely smooth. didnt test games, but in comparison to my s4 (stock samsung rom), the S3 is snappier and opens stuff much faster.

boeffla > all.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] 2phazt:
Does that mean the omni ng kernel also works on cm11 and this even better?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] astankov:
I confirm also that the beta cm ng version is laggy in ui ang games too. Even simple game like subway surf is lagging no matter which cpu governor or scheduler do you use. No problems with the stable version for example.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Full HD:
The Omni version also works on CM11 but I don´t notice any difference in performance. It´s just another source code.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Failyx:
I have no problems with the cm ng Version, and playing games is smooth too
[Galaxy S III Android Development] you_man:
Battery life on NG Boeffla version+ ArchiDroid 2.5.1 - CRAZY.

Telephone worked 1d 12 hour. Use 3g internet+ wifi. No games.

Screen hour: 4h 35 minute. Residual charge 35%
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cassote:
anyone care to explain the diference between NG and "regular" ???

thanks in advance
[Galaxy S III Android Development] marenp:
NG kernels are based on Samsung Update13 sources and regular are based on smdk4x12 sources, seems that NG kernel are now even better than the "older" ones.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ginzo:
I didn't reach your results but I'm really happy about the battery life with NG boeffla cm ?

As a note, with previous boeffla kernels I was unable to obtain more than 3 hours of screen on, together with 50% wifi/2g usage and some game play.. !

Thank you Andi :)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ayoubij:
If you cared a little, youde know that its answered over 5 times...
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
Please, Please, Please ... This question has been asked before. Boeffla answered it many times.

Going on this thread .. its funny when people asked some question that is really annoying. I keep wondering if they actually read the change-logs before posting.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] flither:
yeah = its seems pretty crazy for me too:good: but more tests needed
[Galaxy S III Android Development] nicola1989:
Did u undervolt cpu and gpu?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
The answer is already on the change log. Read :D
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Scarface1991:
The NG Version seems to work very good so far with the latest SlimKat ROM. Will report back about battery life after a couple of cycles.

Offtopic:

You know people, this is the exact kind of thing that can drive a brilliant dev like Andi crazy, if the same question is repeated over and over again. Before asking anything, at least read the last 2 pages and the changelog. Can't be that hard.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
[MENTION=4195614]Scarface1991[/MENTION] I wish they can hear you.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Full HD:
+1 :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::banghead:

Everybody here [MENTION=243864]xda[/MENTION] please read before posting.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] f0xy:
By far the most patient Dev here and also the one that is always more than happy to help.

Much love Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] cerealguy:
I'm on last 2.3 stable omnirom version,... Can I flash last 2.4 beta 1 NG omnirom version over it??
[Galaxy S III Android Development] marenp:
Of course man.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] SuperAce609:
Well, I've just hopped on the NG kernel wagon as well. Hope i get the same results as you guys
[Galaxy S III Android Development] 200:
2.4beta1 NG with latest omnirom = no camera problems, after a whole day use. super stuff! :laugh:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] zikozoko:
plz which kernel to use with resurrection remix RR rom
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Buckycasuals:
omni or cm. your choice
[Galaxy S III Android Development] zikozoko:
no difference ?! :confused:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] XDAMaxe:
As mentioned many times before (read, noob!) kernels are similar. Just try and check yourself.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] you_man:
yep, both uv medium profile.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Partially true, partially wrong.

For the non-NG kernels, the kernel code is different as it uses either the CM or the Omnirom smdk4x12 sources. The initramfs are different.

For the NG kernels, the kernel code itself is the same (basing on latest Samsung Update13 + SEA update2 sources). But the initramfs are still different.

Omnirom Boeffla kernels typically boot on almost every rom, while the CM Boeffla kernels only boot on CM based roms.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ansonchan:
so which mean the NG kernel now is using the same source as archikernel?
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Archikernel uses Samsung Update 13 as far as I know.

I am using Samsung Update 13 + some changes of SEA Update 2.

But on high level, yes, almost the same source basis.

Andi
[Galaxy S III Android Development] JustArchi:
Could you upload your latest changes on github please? :)

I'm currently merging JB improvements from N7100 back to I9300, then I'll move to KK sources.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] andip71:
Will try, but not 100% sure as I am in the middle of relocating now. My internet connection might break even, but we will see.

Andi